| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
5781. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: I agree it would be an issue if we had to have 3. But that is the current metric if solely relying on damps. If changes went through we could use two damps and beat them without the use of a cloak. I don't know what that w...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 21:52:00
|
5782. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Proposal updated. Good catch, Appia. GA Bonus 3% --> 4%
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 21:44:00
|
5783. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Appia Nappia wrote: [redacted] Give me a second ... I'm tweaking the numbers. :: grumbles under breath ::
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 21:23:00
|
5784. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Appia Nappia wrote: Gal needs to be 4% Actually, you're right. I doublechecked the numbers and a 4% Gallente bonus yields results even closer to the status quo than 3%. Thank :-)
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 21:22:00
|
5785. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: In some ways, wouldn't this be an indirect nerf to Amarr scanning? As it stands, if I have 2 Damps and a proto cloak, I have to have my cloak active for an Amarr not to pick me up. If we made this change, I would simply j...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 21:14:00
|
5786. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
OK! Added sheet "Baseline" ... it explains better how I reached the target values. Green boxes mean no change. I chose parameters which maximized the number of green boxes. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1haDO5a9Y6eOD6xzY49HhlkHLktRYcQQ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 21:03:00
|
5787. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Right away--If the above^^were to take place, Min scouts couldn't use a single codebreaker or Kincat in a PC. Thats not fair at all. EDIT: I may have algebra'd wrong...one...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 20:58:00
|
5788. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Appia Nappia wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Appia Nappia wrote: Yup. Gallente neds the racial dampening to 4% as well The GalScout cannot presently beat the Focused Scanner with two damps. At 4% per level, the GalScout can beat the Focuse...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 20:56:00
|
5789. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Appia Nappia wrote: Yup. Gallente neds the racial dampening to 4% as well In the proposed model, the number of damps needed to beat focused scans is unchanged from the present. The GalScout cannot presently beat the Focused Scanner with tw...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 20:50:00
|
5790. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
hfderrtgvcd wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Conceptual Profile / Precision Tweaks: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1haDO5a9Y6eOD6xzY49HhlkHLktRYcQQ382jqR6HxpIo/edit#gid=0 For Haerr's Cloak Concept Cloak - Active Effect: Remove dampen...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 20:40:00
|
5791. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Right away--If the above^^were to take place, Min scouts couldn't use a single codebreaker or Kincat in a PC. Thats not fair at all. EDIT: I may have algebra'd wrong...one sec. Use my math. Its in the spreadsheet. Min...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 20:35:00
|
5792. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Conceptual Profile / Precision Tweaks: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1haDO5a9Y6eOD6xzY49HhlkHLktRYcQQ382jqR6HxpIo/edit#gid=0 For Haerr's Cloak Concept Cloak - Active Effect: Remove dampening bonus Cloak - Active Effect: Set user sca...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 20:24:00
|
5793. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: @ Adipem 1) If you make scan profile 99dB, while cloaked, it effectively does the same amount of damage to hacking as making range 0. The only benefit it would have is that we could still hunt EQ. 2) Hacking-wise, I woul...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 20:00:00
|
5794. Hotfix [Echo] - Fixing Ewar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I challenge you! Prove my hyperbole to be wrong! Line by line! If you don't, we'll assume that my hyperbole is fact (whether or not its hogwash). If you do, each counterpoint you offer will be challenged with new hogwash hyperbole. Rinse, Repe...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 19:52:00
|
5795. Yet another ads thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: XxGhazbaranxX wrote: ... going 40-0 with a scout, a heavy or a logi as long as those damn ADS pilots aren't able to. It's a really hipocritical idea that ground troops will always stick to. To be f...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 18:11:00
|
5796. Yet another ads thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Derrith Erador wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Not sure if you're the right guy to ask or not, but would increasing the ADS / DS acceleration or top speed help? I'd like that, but probably not. It would just lead to more militia swarms complain...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 18:08:00
|
5797. Hotfix [Echo] - Fixing Ewar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: It has to be rebuilt to be fixed Client-side updates are currently off the table. I do wish you'd catch up.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 16:45:00
|
5798. Hotfix [Echo] - Fixing Ewar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: ... but when they only commit 1-2 lows to damps, are they really committed to dampening, or is that a token effort that should be negated by another suit that sacrifices more? A) Undampened Scouts are not making sacrif...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 16:43:00
|
5799. Hotfix [Echo] - Fixing Ewar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: You refuse to directly answer questions, you refuse to expand on ideas, you refuse to clarify reasoning. You are not here for discussion, and because of that you need to leave. Whether or not I leave, your House of Car...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 16:39:00
|
5800. Hotfix [Echo] - Fixing Ewar - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: I've already told you several times, Magnus. Because we can't tweak the top-end of the spectrum without impacting the low-end of the spectrum. The Active Scanner change would be an effective work ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 16:00:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |