| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
5101. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RedBleach LeSanglant wrote: @Adipem Nothi From your last few posts and referencing dampening. I do have a question or two for you if you wouldn't mind. Can all scouts beat the proto Gal proto scanner? or is it only the racial bonuses that hel...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 02:06:00
|
5102. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pseudogenesis wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: voidfaction wrote: I agree the cloak needs some love but I don't want to go back to the days of everyone being a shotgun/nk slayer. scout armor/strafe penalty Is this really a thing? I don't...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 00:54:00
|
5103. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: As for Cloak, this is the Scout's shared class bonus, and this shared bonus should be as effective one race to the next. Cloak's Active Damp effect was removed for a good reason, but that reason no longer exists. The enviro...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 00:53:00
|
5104. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
voidfaction wrote: I agree the cloak needs some love but I don't want to go back to the days of everyone being a shotgun/nk slayer. Decloak delay, scout armor/strafe penalty, vastly improved assaults, cloak-blind, falloff ... a lot has cha...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 00:49:00
|
5105. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
@ Void Circumstances have changed and I believe consensus is now to leave Codebreakers where they are; if I'm mistaken on this, gentlemen, please let me know. As for Cloak, this is the Scout's shared class bonus, and this shared bonus should be ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 00:25:00
|
5106. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
XxBlazikenxX wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: One Eyed King wrote: TritusX wrote: Why codes in highs? Inb4callogi with insane hack speed Because hacking is a Minja thing. We need Lows for Damps and KinCats. This idea came about prior to ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 21:26:00
|
5107. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: TritusX wrote: Why codes in highs? Inb4callogi with insane hack speed Because hacking is a Minja thing. We need Lows for Damps and KinCats. This idea came about prior to 1.9 when Medium Frames were not an issue, and ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 21:21:00
|
5108. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: What's wrong with you guy's, having the pg/codebreakers in the highs would hurt the minja, and cause brick tanking. I thought it was the Minja who wanted CBs moved to highs (because damps are needed in competitive p...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 18:55:00
|
5109. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: @ Gyn Wallace If GalLogi scans were in balance with the pre-nerf / pre-Falloff 1.8 Scout, what are they in balance with now? They weren't. Now, post long-overdue tweaking of Scouts' base stats, ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 18:51:00
|
5110. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Gyn Wallace wrote: Do you disagree that its easier to kill a logi than to kill a scout that isn't being suicidal ? Yes, it is far harder to overrun a blob and kill the Logi at its nucleus than it is to spot and kill a Scout. Edit: I am n...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 18:03:00
|
5111. Kinetic Catalyzer Rework - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Makes sense!
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 18:00:00
|
5112. Time to nerf all HP modules? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fizzer XCIV wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: If everyone would just look to the left of the bus, we can see that there is a thread full of speed and ewar tankers that think they are still the ones who are disadvantaged. Ha...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 17:59:00
|
5113. Time to nerf all HP modules? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vesta Opalus wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: KinCats - These are probably OK. As I detail here , kinetic catalyzers are great at prototype tier, but need work at standard/enhanced tier as their performance and costs make fitting them complet...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 17:55:00
|
5114. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
XxBlazikenxX wrote: Dampeners - I disagree with you on the dampeners, dampeners are supposed to hide you and scanners are supposed to find you, if you have dampener on and you still get scanned, then that guy has more scanning abilities than y...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 17:34:00
|
5115. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ares 514 wrote: For Range Extenders they need to just have them affect the two outer rings. What they should have done is made ALL inner rings say 5meters and had the two outer rings vary by suits/skills/range extenders. This way they wouldn't...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 17:26:00
|
5116. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
@ Gyn Wallace I agree with you that the role of Logi is disproportionately expensive. Why are you assuming that Scouts run BPO / Basic gear? MinScout have no choice but to run a prototype suit (and a prototype cloak) to beat GalLogi scans. Shou...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 17:21:00
|
5117. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thoughts? EWAR Ideas Damps - Reduce active scan duration (credit to Jebus). Range Extenders - In bad shape, but can't buff 'em without nerfing Falloff inner ring. Precision Enhancers - These are probably OK. Biotics MyoFibs - Add jumps (cr...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 16:39:00
|
5118. Time to nerf all HP modules? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fizzer XCIV wrote: If everyone would just look to the left of the bus, we can see that there is a thread full of speed and ewar tankers that think they are still the ones who are disadvantaged. Have a gander: http://dust.thang.dk/market_try...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 16:31:00
|
5119. Time to nerf all HP modules? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
shaman oga wrote: Or to buff all utility modules? ^ Indeed. HP is still King , and King HP is bad for build variety. EWAR Damps - Reduce active scan duration. Range Extenders - In bad shape, but can't buff 'em without nerfing Falloff ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 16:04:00
|
5120. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fact Checking =/= Bashing Logistics Gyn Wallace opined that stealth play is low risk. It isn't. This is a poor premise upon which to build an argument about balance. That's the point I'd intended to make.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.26 13:17:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |