| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
5081. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Driftward wrote: And coming back a year later....my last post was somewhere on page 370 or so.... Welcome back, Driftward!! Don't forget to claim your Nothi Knives from the newsletter :-) Don't run off on account of pubstomps; they'll be fi...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 22:31:00
|
5082. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Varoth Drac wrote: Possibly if activating the cloak as a reaction to being scanned removed the scan it could work. I suspect that would altogether negate the need for damps, which wouldn't be good for balance.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 19:02:00
|
5083. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jebus McKing wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Pitched swapping the GalLogi Precision bonus for a Cooldown bonus. Less cycle time = more scans = more WP. In theory it is a good idea. The problem though is that we would have to change a lot of stat...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 18:34:00
|
5084. can dust become balanced? - in General Discussions [original thread]
jade gamester wrote: Tier based seems legit basic/militia advanced then proto/ officer, that is how you change the game So if pub queue times today are 2-3 minutes, what would queue times be if we split pubs into 3 different tiers?
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 18:03:00
|
5085. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jebus McKing wrote: That being said, of course the Logis will disagree with these changes, because it means they will get less WPs. The problem with the scanner is, it is way more powerful than the WPs for scanning suggest. Maybe we should inc...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 17:53:00
|
5086. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jebus McKing wrote: The binary nature of scanning is a bad thing. It forces people to either go full dampening or don't bother with it at all. There is no middle ground. There is absolutely no incentive to use damps on anything but Scouts beca...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 17:29:00
|
5087. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Varoth Drac wrote: There is no consensus on high slot codebreakers. Agreed 100%.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 17:10:00
|
5088. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Gyn Wallace wrote: Its nice to see that you're in a thread about buffing the weakest class in the game, arguing for buffing scouts that aren't under-powered Select Category:Dropsuits Commandos are the weakest class in the game. If Logis a...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 16:08:00
|
5089. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
If shimmer reduction is an option, then yes, absolutely; this would be the optimal fix for cloak. If shimmer reduction is not an option, however, we should consider easily implemented alternatives.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 14:53:00
|
5090. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: Seriously raven sometimes you have good ideas, and sometimes you pull things from your ass. I disagree. To the very best of my recollection, Raven has contributed nothing of value in his 100+ posts in this thread. His...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 14:48:00
|
5091. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RedBleach LeSanglant wrote: In your opinion when should active scans or dampeners win? Step by step, tier by tier, I think that a fully Damped Scout should beat the equal level of Scanner so a full dam[ proto scout beats proto scanner. But the...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 14:35:00
|
5092. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mister Goo wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: RedBleach LeSanglant wrote: I NEED TO FIND AS SCANNING RESOURCE - I don't want to just dump number hunting onto you, I'd rather have some of my own answers. - I remember looking at one. I'll have to...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 14:10:00
|
5093. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RedBleach LeSanglant wrote: I NEED TO FIND AS SCANNING RESOURCE - I don't want to just dump number hunting onto you, I'd rather have some of my own answers. - I remember looking at one. I'll have to find it. Here are two: Borrowed from ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 13:31:00
|
5094. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghost Kaisar wrote: And they provide an extra basic dampener at proto level. Not worth at all. Propose we change that: 0-5-10 to 10-15-25
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 03:23:00
|
5095. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RedBleach LeSanglant wrote: Please, tell me what you think. RedBleach's Logi Proposal Logi base scan range was increased to 25m when Falloff was introduced. This is the highest of all classes. Your proposal appears to reflect old values....
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 03:10:00
|
5096. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cloakblind GalScout + 0 Range Extenders Inner Ring - 1 meter Outer Ring - 5 meters Cloakblind CalScout + 0 Range Extenders Inner Ring - 1 meter Outer Ring - 7 meters Cloakblind CalScout + 2 Range Extenders Inner Ring - 2 meters Outer Ring...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 02:47:00
|
5097. What's this? Hate mail from a Gallicus? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Edau Skir2 wrote: "You and your team should find a new game to play, because you all suck so hard it's boring for us" Unbelievable.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 02:36:00
|
5098. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
voidfaction wrote: I do prefer the cal as a shotgunner scout though because as you said the cloak blind is not such a problem .. There's a good chance Raven is just making stuff up. Does anyone remember the actual cloak-blind numbers?
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 02:34:00
|
5099. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spademan wrote: Quote: GA/CA Scouts now beat 15dB scans at 2 damps + basic cloak (instead of 2 damps + proto). MN/AM Scouts now beat 15dB scans at 2 damps + proto cloak (instead of 3 damps + proto). GA/CA Scouts now beat 21dB scans at 0 dam...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 02:32:00
|
5100. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
sir RAVEN WING wrote: who would be for the Minmatar Scout getting a Melee bonus. (To range of melee or maybe damage.) I like the old Gav better than this new Gav.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2015.02.27 02:21:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |