| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
4581. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Right away--If the above^^were to take place, Min scouts couldn't use a single codebreaker or Kincat in a PC. Thats not fair at all. EDIT: I may have algebra'd wrong...one sec. Use my math. Its in the spreadsheet. Min...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 20:35:00
|
4582. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Conceptual Profile / Precision Tweaks: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1haDO5a9Y6eOD6xzY49HhlkHLktRYcQQ382jqR6HxpIo/edit#gid=0 For Haerr's Cloak Concept Cloak - Active Effect: Remove dampening bonus Cloak - Active Effect: Set user sca...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 20:24:00
|
4583. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: @ Adipem 1) If you make scan profile 99dB, while cloaked, it effectively does the same amount of damage to hacking as making range 0. The only benefit it would have is that we could still hunt EQ. 2) Hacking-wise, I woul...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 20:00:00
|
4584. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
hfderrtgvcd wrote: Maybe shield extenders could also get their current penalty replaced with one to scan profile? Would disproportionately impact MN/CA Scouts. Movement penalty is one thing. Having your position revealed to entire enemy squa...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 15:17:00
|
4585. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: Appia Nappia wrote: And messing with the Active scanner values **** over medium frames. If you decrease the proto scanner below 28 then there is no reason for a medium frame to use profile dampeners. . . and thanks to th...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 14:01:00
|
4586. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Cloaking is compromised as is...I don't see a reason to make it any worse TBH. If something like this happened, id like to actually be invisible, and to get a better dampening bonus. Then Id be all for it. If we move...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 13:42:00
|
4587. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: @ Everyone I truly believe Haerr is on to something; the more I think about his suggestion, the more I like it: If Cloak is Active, set Scan Range = 0. I think this would make gameplay much more ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 13:21:00
|
4588. [Compilaton] For Hotfix Echo! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: For the List * Buff 28 dB Active Scanners to 25 dB. * Buff 46 dB Active Scanners to 44 dB. * Buff Assault/Logi Scan Profile by 6 dB. Benefits * Affords non-scouts a better means by which to scan undampened scouts * Impr...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 13:14:00
|
4589. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Will even harsher speed penalties on plates accomplish two things, slow down brick tanked scouts and make Commandos the same HP as brick tanked Aesaults yet naturally faster at the same eHP? Heavies previously indicated th...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 13:05:00
|
4590. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Efficacy Bonuses Efficacy Bonuses made more sense prior to EWAR normalization, and even then they were a shoehorn (originally pointed out by Aeon). There are cleaner and less restrictive ways to address high-HP Scouts.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 12:47:00
|
4591. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
LeGoose wrote: Jeeze you guys have been busy this weekend. Took me like an hour of not reading a majority of the long posts just to catch up. Anywho do we have any ideas how people are doing in the sidearm challenge? Musturd played for exa...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 05:44:00
|
4592. Beginners Scout Guide - in General Discussions [original thread]
xavier zor wrote: DO NOT FIT A SHOTGUN WITH KNIVES ^ What he said.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 05:30:00
|
4593. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Appia Nappia wrote: And messing with the Active scanner values **** over medium frames. If you decrease the proto scanner below 28 then there is no reason for a medium frame to use profile dampeners. . . and thanks to the gal logi precision bo...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 04:06:00
|
4594. [Compilaton] For Hotfix Echo! - in General Discussions [original thread]
For the List: To afford non-scouts a better means by which to scan undampened Scouts ... * Buff 28 dB Active Scanners to 25 dB. * Buff Assault Scan Profile by 5 dB Secondary Benefits * Improves GA Logi counter-recon capabilities * Improves ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 03:58:00
|
4595. [Compilaton] For Hotfix Echo! - in General Discussions [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Drop the second equipment slot from Scouts. Leave the cpu/pg. Or pull it too. But pull the slot. Cloak is supposed to help the scout do his job. Cloak is not the scout's job. O...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 03:53:00
|
4596. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: If a scout has no damps it should be picked up by a medium frame with a single complex precision mod. At first glance, this sounds reasonable. To me, at least. Having looked into the numbers, satisfying this request w...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 01:40:00
|
4597. [Compilaton] For Hotfix Echo! - in General Discussions [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Drop the second equipment slot from Scouts. Leave the cpu/pg. Or pull it too. But pull the slot. Cloak is supposed to help the scout do his job. Cloak is not the scout's job. Opposed.
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 01:05:00
|
4598. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm having a good time for free. dude. Why not?
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.13 00:48:00
|
4599. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pseudogenesis wrote: An independent barber shop would be nice, but I guess don't really see the point? It'll make it harder for developer types to get feedback, it'll make it less open to newcomers and more of a "sekrit club" type deal, and con...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.12 05:22:00
|
4600. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Event Posted
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.10.12 04:48:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |