Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
221. 13 days to 10th December - in General Discussions [original thread]
Reav Hannari wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: CCP Foxfour is writing a massive dev blog. Trust me, it's big. My spies have acquired the title of this masterpiece: "The Adventures of My Left Shoe, A Sock Story" Or Sox four: how to train to bec...
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.27 20:52:00
|
222. 13 days to 10th December - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Logibro wrote: CCP Foxfour is writing a massive dev blog. Trust me, it's big. Bigger then my bit of string
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.27 20:49:00
|
223. Musings of Several Community Members on BPO Removal. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Links in thread. Please read them, realise that all your QQ has been made already and create no more of these threads. (HOW IRONIC HE'S CREATING A THREAD TO COMPLAIN ABOUT PEOPLE CREATING THREADS) Seymor Krelborn's. ...
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.27 20:47:00
|
224. Make the game balanced : Reduce the forge gun damage by 500 on all variants. - in General Discussions [original thread]
rpastry wrote: IRL a Tank generally has a crew of 4 IRL Infantry AV weapons can take out a tank with one round. You've got it back to front, a tank shouldn't be able to solo infantry. You want a team effort to take out a tank? it should be a...
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.27 13:27:00
|
225. The scrambler rifle is overrated... - in General Discussions [original thread]
The gun should be used as a mid to long range weapon.
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.27 11:54:00
|
226. WTF amarr? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm sorry
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.27 11:52:00
|
227. DID I MISS SOMETHING [player market?] - in General Discussions [original thread]
jenza aranda wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: because someone mentioned it and it spread like wildfire sorry, not in 1.7. lies...
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.27 11:25:00
|
228. Make the game balanced : Reduce the forge gun damage by 500 on all variants. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Foxhound Elite wrote: It's that simple. One infantryman shouldn't be able to take out one medium-heavy vehicle. At minimum it should be two-three players working together to take out the mechanical threat. Maybe one very very persistant / good ...
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.27 11:19:00
|
229. Make the game balanced : Reduce the forge gun damage by 500 on all variants. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: i agree, but by following a different line of reasoning. Why should a 300 k rail turret powered by a tank do less damage than a 15 k infantry cannon? We'll see how 1.7 changes in the forge vs vehicles debate, but the way i thi...
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.27 11:13:00
|
230. CCP CUSTOMIZATION IS KEY / CHANGE TO MAKE GAME MORE FUN - in General Discussions [original thread]
One thing you have to realise, is their winging it.
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.27 10:59:00
|
231. Make the game balanced : Reduce the forge gun damage by 500 on all variants. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Foxhound Elite wrote: It's that simple. One infantryman shouldn't be able to take out one medium-heavy vehicle. At minimum it should be two-three players working together to take out the mechanical threat. Maybe one very very persistant / good ...
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.27 10:53:00
|
232. Impact of Sidearm Only Logi on Battlefield and Player Retention - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: Rei Shepard wrote: Quote: I firmly believe that logi suit players make up a vast majority of Dust 514. So true, because every Assault is using one.... I want to touch on this some more. People chose the logi s...
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.26 18:21:00
|
233. CCP, Your combat rifle... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ulysses Knapse wrote: Are you seriously trying to say that the Combat Rifle looks like an AK-47 ? Jesus, man. Whatever drugs you're taking, I want. Can't you see it
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.26 00:55:00
|
234. CCP, Your combat rifle... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: 4447 wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: But the question persists; how does it look like an AK? It's like comparing a mini compact to a muscle car. Bull pups are better then AK's. *facepalm* I ask you for X and you g...
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.25 21:27:00
|
235. CCP, Your combat rifle... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: But the question persists; how does it look like an AK? It's like comparing a mini compact to a muscle car. Bull pups are better then AK's.
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.25 20:59:00
|
236. CCP you need to help a bit here ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: 518 million ISK here free isk, for all.
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.25 20:54:00
|
237. CCP, Your combat rifle... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: 4447 wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: How does this look like an AK? About the magazine... Probably uses a magnetic rail assist to push bullets up at an angle then straight up. the gun is gas powered. Edited my co...
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.25 20:51:00
|
238. CCP, Your combat rifle... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: How does this look like an AK? About the magazine... Probably uses a magnetic rail assist to push bullets up at an angle then straight up. the gun is gas powered.
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.25 20:45:00
|
239. CCP, Your combat rifle... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: The Combat Rifle is not based off the AK. So you are wrong in more ways than one. Also, the AK - 103 had a Bull pup variant. evidence tell me how that mag feeds into the chamber, have a 5 min look if you can. linky
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.25 20:41:00
|
240. CCP, Your combat rifle... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: The Combat Rifle is not based off the AK. So you are wrong in more ways than one. Also, the AK - 103 had a Bull pup variant. evidence But not the ak 47.
- by 4447 - at 2013.11.25 20:40:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |