| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
101. uk psn down - in General Discussions [original thread]
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.09 14:10:00
|
102. How is increasing scout speed consider bad? - in General Discussions [original thread]
negative49er wrote: it define the purposes of a scout If scouts got more speed then HD would be broken again.
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.09 08:47:00
|
103. Wow, the effect of PS4 is really noticeable now :( - in General Discussions [original thread]
How many people play dc universe online on ps3?
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.07 12:47:00
|
104. So 1.8 and scouts - in General Discussions [original thread]
Guys, 1.8 is a rebalance of 1.7.
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.07 11:09:00
|
105. give scanners a limited amount on charges - in General Discussions [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: @ zekain . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-GÇÿGÇ¥. . . . . . . . . .``~., . . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-GÇ¥. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .GÇ£-., . . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.07 11:03:00
|
106. Aim Assist - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rahl Draak wrote: I'm pretty sure CCP has attached a "value" on whether or not to pull the plug on Dust should player count keep dropping as it has in the last 9 months. This game is still beta and for CCP to pull the plug would be silly. ...
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 16:53:00
|
107. Aim Assist - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jammeh McJam wrote: Rahl Draak wrote: Jammeh McJam wrote: If aim assist was off then caldari and minmatar would stop with the dual tanking because strafing would work and speed would be useful The fact that "dual tanking" is encouraged...
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 16:36:00
|
108. Aim Assist - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't know how PC gamers can enjoy a FPS sitting up right.
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 14:45:00
|
109. Aim Assist - in General Discussions [original thread]
If you care so much, turn it off.
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 14:36:00
|
110. BPO talk - in General Discussions [original thread]
Are BPO really affecting public matches I mean how much isk is really being lost from using BPO
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 14:32:00
|
111. Don't call the combat rifle OP after 1.7 if you only armor tank. - in General Discussions [original thread]
This.
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 13:50:00
|
112. Would you still hate logis if TTK was rebalanced so everyone can quit armor tank... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer94 wrote: Some weapons need their DPS lowered, and some don't. Need DPS Nerf(10-15%): ARs(its variants are fine, just the regular AR), ScRs, AScRs, Rail Rifles(RR), ARR, Combat Rifles(CR), ACR, SMGs, Locus Grenades(a lot), AV Grenades(ne...
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 11:13:00
|
113. Would you still hate logis if TTK was rebalanced so everyone can quit armor tank... - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: 4447 wrote: Leave TTK alone. Armour tanking has its ups and downs, for instants negative movement on armour. you guys do know that there are weapons that do more damage to armour right I don't armour tank because i ...
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 11:11:00
|
114. Would you still hate logis if TTK was rebalanced so everyone can quit armor tank... - in General Discussions [original thread]
abarkrishna wrote: When I said armor tanking I was referring to HP tanking in general. What I am saying is that with TTK being so low that it is not worth losing the extra HP to fit anything else. The TTK is making everyone run the exact same b...
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 11:10:00
|
115. Keeping BPO for the future... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rynoceros wrote: This nonsense about BPOs ruining the Market has to stop. They don't/won't. 98% of all BPOs are cheap *** Standard equipment. A BPO Dropsuit will probably save you <250,000 ISK a week for most players. The frequency of Offic...
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 11:05:00
|
116. Would you still hate logis if TTK was rebalanced so everyone can quit armor tank... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Leave TTK alone. Armour tanking has its ups and downs, for instants negative movement on armour. you guys do know that there are weapons that do more damage to armour right I don't armour tank because i don't like being slow.
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 11:03:00
|
117. Keeping BPO for the future... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: 4447 wrote: So your saying that the old BPO are worthless. With a few exceptions, such as, the mag suits, skin weaves. Can't imagine that the elite an vet packs sold an overwhelm amount of copies (but most of these BPO...
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 10:37:00
|
118. Keeping BPO for the future... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: 4447 wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: 4447 wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Given the current size of the player base we have now, I don't think that CCP needs to add anymore BPOs any time soon or even SOONtm. Also CCP has s...
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 09:24:00
|
119. Keeping BPO for the future... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: 4447 wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Given the current size of the player base we have now, I don't think that CCP needs to add anymore BPOs any time soon or even SOONtm. Also CCP has stated that BPOs are not functioning as...
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 08:47:00
|
120. Keeping BPO for the future... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Given the current size of the player base we have now, I don't think that CCP needs to add anymore BPOs any time soon or even SOONtm. Also CCP has stated that BPOs are not functioning as intended, so, in the near future, I w...
- by 4447 - at 2013.12.06 08:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |