Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
excillon
united we stand x
0
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 09:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
I have a few problems:
1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
2. I'm sick of Iron sights. Why can't I have an A-cog scope to stick on my Toxin AR? Preferably a BPO module.
3. The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high. I regularly get hit from far off distances with it, and that shouldn't happen.
4. Where is the armory and user marketplace we keep hearing is coming? If I want to share my equipment with my corp, I should be able to.
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
6. Guys that sit there and camp in insanely high places. There needs to be map limits not just on boundaries on the ground, but up on buildings as well.
7. More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
8. Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. However, for a game that's supposed to cater to people with multiple opinions (BPO's vs. consumables, etc.) it doesn't seem to. |
Karl Koekwaus
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
146
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 09:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
So you're basically saying "I like the game", except I don't like the mechanics, the weapons, the setting and the vision behind it?
Then you go off and try to make a point by saying that the game "cater(s) to people with multiple opinions", while trying to push your opinion of how it should be Pay2Win, because that's how you want it to be.
It would've been more concise if you just said you don't like the game, since it appears you don't like more than you like about it. If you want to throw money at something and win sometimes, might I suggest a slot machine. You won't get back as much as you throw in, but you'll occasionally win a token amount back to keep you playing longer. |
TheEnd762
SVER True Blood
138
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 09:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
1. No. 2. No. 3. No. 4. Yeah, okay. 5. No. 6. HELL NO. 7. No. 8. No.
Overall I give your post, effort, and existence an F. Move along. |
ALPHA DECRIPTER
M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
204
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 09:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP already said that they don't want AUR items to be better then ISK items. It was one of there selling points actually, and the main reason why I play the game. To make AUR items better then ISK items would make the game P2W and that would cause CCP to lose over half it's player base. This would actually include some players that pay for AUR items. CCP wants to bring more players into the game, not push the majority away.
4 is on it's way. The one thing you must learn when dealing with CCP is patience. Those that have it will enjoy the game a lot longer.
`Sigh. Just another fun game of DUST . |
True Adamance
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
986
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 10:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
Hey OP....
HTFU! |
Beeeees
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
69
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 12:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Pathetic self entitled child. Your daddy should get the advantage in the game, since he is the one paying for AUR on your account. |
Captain Wontubulous
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
75
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 15:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
This is insanely pathetic. None of this is accurate or even remotely thought out. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1435
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 15:31:00 -
[8] - Quote
To me, and yes I'm going to say it, this sounds like yet another AR user complaining that he can't kill everything all the time with his trusty AR. Well, OP, we're pretty close to the point where you can. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
3497
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 15:42:00 -
[9] - Quote
The market will come. The problem is Eve Online. DUST's market will merge with the Eve market.
Eve Online has an economy and market that is so complex, yet so successful, that Guild Wars II tried to adopt the system. Eve's economy is considered to be the most robust and the most stable in the entire mmo industry. |
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
855
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 15:43:00 -
[10] - Quote
Is this kid for real?
This has got to be a troll. |
|
low genius
the sound of freedom Renegade Alliance
246
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 15:46:00 -
[11] - Quote
excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
2. I'm sick of Iron sights. Why can't I have an A-cog scope to stick on my Toxin AR? Preferably a BPO module.
3. The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high. I regularly get hit from far off distances with it, and that shouldn't happen. Same with Mass Drivers, I just played a match where either someone had rapid fire, or that firing rate needs to be seriously slowed down. I didn't get killed, but watched 4 of my teammates basically get sniped with one, in very quick succession.
4. Where is the armory and user marketplace we keep hearing is coming? If I want to share my equipment with my corp, I should be able to.
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
6. Guys that sit there and camp in insanely high places. There needs to be map limits not just on boundaries on the ground, but up on buildings as well.
7. More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
8. Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. However, for a game that's supposed to cater to people with multiple opinions (BPO's vs. consumables, etc.) it doesn't seem to.
maybe try getting better at the game? you're complaining about the money you chose to spend? foolish. |
Hecarim Van Hohen
Bullet Cluster
96
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 15:50:00 -
[12] - Quote
excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
2. I'm sick of Iron sights. Why can't I have an A-cog scope to stick on my Toxin AR? Preferably a BPO module.
3. The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high. I regularly get hit from far off distances with it, and that shouldn't happen. Same with Mass Drivers, I just played a match where either someone had rapid fire, or that firing rate needs to be seriously slowed down. I didn't get killed, but watched 4 of my teammates basically get sniped with one, in very quick succession.
4. Where is the armory and user marketplace we keep hearing is coming? If I want to share my equipment with my corp, I should be able to.
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
6. Guys that sit there and camp in insanely high places. There needs to be map limits not just on boundaries on the ground, but up on buildings as well.
7. More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
8. Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. However, for a game that's supposed to cater to people with multiple opinions (BPO's vs. consumables, etc.) it doesn't seem to.
1. P2W much? 2. It's coming SoonGäó, have some patience as they have more important stuff to do atm 3. I usually die to a shotgun when I'm being stupid or I get ambushed, both cases are cool with me so no, shotty is ok imo. 4. It's coming SoonGäó, have some patience as they have more important stuff to do atm 5. Damn, that's a lot of wp, heard rumors of a possible glitch, waiting for confirmation on that. 6. There are sniper rifles you can use to deal with them or you can just avoid open ground or prevent them from getting there with a swarm launcher :) 7. Actually this might be on the roadmap, but have some patience as they have more important stuff to do atm 8. PC users = mouse and keyboard users? If so then no, they should stay here with us DS3 guys, and this is the first time someone referred move sharpshooter as an advantage :D
About BPO's, I'm assuming (yes, I know it's bad but...) that they will work like they do in EVE so they might not be all that "free" then
Have a pleasant day :) |
FLAYLOCK Steve
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
50
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 16:20:00 -
[13] - Quote
The only thing I do agree in is more bpos. Basically every merc pack have the same suit just different color. (I own all three packs.)
1. Eh kinda agree. Need more bpos but don't make them as strong as isk gear. I hate p2w even though I can afford it. 2. It's not cod or bf. 3. Shotguns suck really bad atm. Since the hit detection is bugged the shotgun sometimes shoots blanks. And it doesn't have a lot of range. The fk? Half the time I kill someone with them by the time they figure out it was a sg that kill them I'm far away maybe that's why you think they have to much range.? As for mass drivers trust me it's far from op kid. Get good, know the gun and it's disadvantages. I know them. I have most of the guns :). 4.dk 5.OB Strikes are not bugged. It my sqaud just play smart. We kill vehicles. We kill installations and kill people. I've gotten 4 ob strikes many times. Did I mention vehicle kill assist :). We use drop up links etc anything to get points. Try that noob. 6. I don't really have a problem with campers. It makes me more alert so be careful for snipers. 7. I agree. More bpo please but quit nerfing **** ccp fail at that. 8. Seriously? Lol do I hear a nerf mouse and keyboard cry? Pathetic
Get good noob lol.
|
Cass Caul
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
25
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 16:36:00 -
[14] - Quote
Yeah, kinda lame that my Dragonfly Assault and Covenant Assault are the exact same. Sure If I was spec'd into Gallente Assault or Caldari Assault then I'd get the bonuses applied, but I don't. Pretty sure Dren Assault is also the same, but didn't shell out the 100 bucks for it. |
Demon Buddah
The Phoenix Federation
48
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 16:46:00 -
[15] - Quote
So I read the first one and stopped. This isn't pay to win noob. Risk is what makes this game unique compare to other shooters. Risk makes this game more of a challenge. You think just because you can pay for stuff with real money you should get an advantage? Seriously man. You don't like it GTFO Dust doesn't need people like you. You're going to complain about risk you'll never survive in New Eden. If everyone had BPO for higher stuff then what would be the point in using ISK items? it's a free game too, and by free it's actually free. Don't expect to win just because you pay with real money. That's not how this game is going to be, and it shouldn't be that way either. |
FLAYLOCK Steve
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
51
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 17:42:00 -
[16] - Quote
Cass Caul wrote:Yeah, kinda lame that my Dragonfly Assault and Covenant Assault the exact same. Sure If I was spec'd into Gallente Assault or Caldari Assault then I'd get the bonuses applied, but I don't. Pretty sure Dren Assault is also the same, but didn't shell out the 100 bucks for it. I believe you do get the racial bonus. I own every merc pack but from whst i understand it's a bpo suit that requires no skills but also you get the bonus because it is not a basic frame suit. |
Skipper Jones
Murder Cakes Of Doom
573
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 17:51:00 -
[17] - Quote
Let me interpret this for you guys.
"I'm tired of dying to people who use isk! I want this game to be pay2win!
I am a great FPS player and the only reason I'm dying is because it's not pay2win. You fools! I'm better than you. I do not deserve to die. My gun should have gold enchanted bullets that set ablaze anyone that get hit by them. CCP you bow to me! Give me what I want."
Now, anyone that has seen my previous post will know I've never said this. It hurts me to say.....
HTFU (ugh) |
ADAM-OF-EVE
Svartur Bjorn
165
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 21:19:00 -
[18] - Quote
lol.. nuf said |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood
890
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 21:42:00 -
[19] - Quote
excillon wrote: If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage.
no |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
2861
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 21:54:00 -
[20] - Quote
excillon wrote:Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon.
So you're obviously ******* mental.
I mean, people are STILL posting threads about "pay-to-win" after all this time, and you are literally arguing that the game isn't good because you can't "pay-to-win"? |
|
Lightning Bolt2
DUST University Ivy League
89
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 21:56:00 -
[21] - Quote
another P2W thread... there's been way to many already, besides BPOs are already a good adv, you get more ISK than those without BPOs. |
Cat Merc
BetaMax.
3800
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 22:00:00 -
[22] - Quote
Obvious troll is obvious. Don't feed him. |
Cyrille Fodeux
DUST University Ivy League
46
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 22:07:00 -
[23] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:The market will come. The problem is Eve Online. DUST's market will merge with the Eve market.
Eve Online has an economy and market that is so complex, yet so successful, that Guild Wars II tried to adopt the system. Eve's economy is considered to be the most robust and the most stable in the entire mmo industry.
It-¦s so complex my geopraphy teacher even referred to it as the best example for a free enterprise economy. |
The dark cloud
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
1816
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 22:10:00 -
[24] - Quote
TL;DR I WANT PAY TO WIN. NOOBS WITH ISK GUNS KEEP KILLING ME! P2W NOW CCP OR I QUIT THE GAME. WAAH! WAAAH! |
Dog Merc
Sebiestor Field Sappers Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 22:56:00 -
[25] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Obvious troll is obvious. Don't feed him. Obvious cat is obvious.
Grr! BTW, I declare this thread is about whipped cream.
Mmmmm.... |
Dog Merc
Sebiestor Field Sappers Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 22:57:00 -
[26] - Quote
Cyrille Fodeux wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:The market will come. The problem is Eve Online. DUST's market will merge with the Eve market.
Eve Online has an economy and market that is so complex, yet so successful, that Guild Wars II tried to adopt the system. Eve's economy is considered to be the most robust and the most stable in the entire mmo industry. It-¦s so complex my geopraphy teacher even referred to it as the best example for a free enterprise economy. You joking?
Lulz. So many lulz. |
D legendary hero
THE WARRIORS OF LEGEND
548
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 00:06:00 -
[27] - Quote
BPOs work great right now. you wast zero isk, and they are pretty dang effective. |
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
54
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 00:29:00 -
[28] - Quote
mass driver does need a reduction in rof..
it fires to fast for a nade launcher... |
excillon
united we stand x
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 07:49:00 -
[29] - Quote
Beeeees wrote:Pathetic self entitled child. Your daddy should get the advantage in the game, since he is the one paying for AUR on your account.
Uh, no. I happen to be a very financially well off adult. Nice try though. Now, if you're done insulting my opinion instead of discussing it, move on. |
excillon
united we stand x
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 07:58:00 -
[30] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Obvious troll is obvious. Don't feed him.
A troll no. Just someone with an opinion that differs from the majority of others. I'm not alone, either. There's more of us than you think. So how does that make me a troll? Last I checked, I have a right to express it. You don't like it, or want to debate it, then why don't you just stay out of it.
You hate a guy in real life, because he has a nicer car than you? Or a bigger house? No, you don't. I don't want to pay to win, I just want a better deal for what I pay for.
So because I'm not some broke college kid gamer, and I want to buy my weapons, that makes me a troll? Am I everything that's wrong with dust then? Because as I mentioned in the original post, I'm actually contributing to developing this game by helping pay these developers salaries. You're playing this game, in part, because of people in EVE, and people like me that spend money and don't freeload.
I brought this up to discuss it. If you have a different view, so be it. I respect that. Now you respect mine: If you're not here to discuss what I mentioned INTELLIGENTLY, then why don't you just do me a favor and **** off? Is that simple enough of a reply for you?
|
|
Jade Hasegawa
Intrepidus XI EoN.
29
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 07:59:00 -
[31] - Quote
OP you missed the point somewhat, AURUM gear is so you can skip SP allocation too a degree, I have done that to use proto gear, but when I am having bad rounds (quite alot of them these days when I can be bothered with playing, game is going stale) its nice to swap to my Covenant DS with a Toxin AR and some ISKmods on knowing the ISK parts of that suit fitting only cost 10K ISK per fitting rather then 35K for my advanced, looking at the ISK cost of Duvolles/proto scramblers and the cost of proto Caldari assault suitsthats going to be 250 to 300K per suit, not fun to lose them
yes You now hoav a shiny BPO suit/gun/lav
but if it was superior and almost impossible to beat with ISK gear you would drive away those who cannot afford them, the few AURUM things I have came froma birthday PSN giftcard, and most of that went on SP boosters lol |
excillon
united we stand x
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:03:00 -
[32] - Quote
Jade Hasegawa wrote:OP you missed the point somewhat, AURUM gear is so you can skip SP allocation too a degree, I have done that to use proto gear, but when I am having bad rounds (quite alot of them these days when I can be bothered with playing, game is going stale) its nice to swap to my Covenant DS with a Toxin AR and some ISKmods on knowing the ISK parts of that suit fitting only cost 10K ISK per fitting rather then 35K for my advanced, looking at the ISK cost of Duvolles/proto scramblers and the cost of proto Caldari assault suitsthats going to be 250 to 300K per suit, not fun to lose them
yes You now hoav a shiny BPO suit/gun/lav
but if it was superior and almost impossible to beat with ISK gear you would drive away those who cannot afford them, the few AURUM things I have came froma birthday PSN giftcard, and most of that went on SP boosters lol
I don't miss the point. I'm not saying make Aurum gear not have ISK equivalents. I"m saying that the bundles should be stocked better. I own every BPO on Dust right now that's purchased with Aurum (I have my reasons), and while they're ok, I just feel they should be more. It's not saying I should be better on a P2W side, it's that if people are spending money, they should get better. Don't change the game, improve the bundles. |
excillon
united we stand x
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:04:00 -
[33] - Quote
And to those who took time to honestly discuss and debate these things without jumping to the troll conclusions, thank you. Even if your opinion differs from mine. |
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F
1334
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:05:00 -
[34] - Quote
so u want better gear instantly that beats ppls gear that have spent 1000s of hours getting sp for better gear... |
Ren Ratner
Infinite Raiders
28
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:12:00 -
[35] - Quote
Everyone hates you and you should probably find a game that you actually enjoy. |
excillon
united we stand x
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:15:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ren Ratner wrote:Everyone hates you and you should probably find a game that you actually enjoy.
You actually hate someone because they have a different view? How very ignorant of you. And I have lots of other games I'm good at, I'll bury anyone here on killzone. That's not the point. |
excillon
united we stand x
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:20:00 -
[37] - Quote
Demon Buddah wrote:So I read the first one and stopped. This isn't pay to win noob. Risk is what makes this game unique compare to other shooters. Risk makes this game more of a challenge. You think just because you can pay for stuff with real money you should get an advantage? Seriously man. You don't like it GTFO Dust doesn't need people like you. You're going to complain about risk you'll never survive in New Eden. If everyone had BPO for higher stuff then what would be the point in using ISK items? it's a free game too, and by free it's actually free. Don't expect to win just because you pay with real money. That's not how this game is going to be, and it shouldn't be that way either.
I guess I'm going to take the time to address everyone individually.
Who are you to tell me to get out what Dust needs or doesn't? Again, people like me pay for this game so people like you can play it.
To clarify, I'm not a noob, I played this since the Beta launched, and used the ISK items, so I clearly understand both sides of the argument. I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it. |
excillon
united we stand x
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:31:00 -
[38] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:excillon wrote:Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon.
So you're obviously ******* mental. I mean, people are STILL posting threads about "pay-to-win" after all this time, and you are literally arguing that the game isn't good because you can't "pay-to-win"?
I'm saying that it should be an option. If it's truly an open game, then let people that don't want (or can't) spend 1000's of hours leveling up spend the money and compete with the ones that do.
Why should it be fair that some kid has all the time in the world to play the game and level up, while others with lives, careers etc. have to get slaughtered because we can't put the time in? Maybe by spending the money, we give ourselves a chance to compete against them. Sounds like the people that play for free complain about P2W players basically say that "they didn't earn it so they shouldn't have it".
Which, in my eyes, makes the ones who do have the advantage of time to spend on it nothing more than bullies and control freaks on here.
I'm not saying I'm sick of dying or not, or losing, what I'm saying is level the playing field for ALL users. Which is the entire basis of argument for the non BPO guys. If they want to level it and make it even, then REALLY level it and make it even, for EVERYONE. From noobs, to people that don't have all week to constantly play video games, to the ones that do.
And for the record, since I don't use my ISK much or at all, I usually give it away. Some to members in my corp, some to guys who I play with that watch my back, and some to opponents who gave me an honestly good fight. So not only am I helping pay for the game, I'm even helping the solely ISK users as well that can't or don't want to pay. |
Skipper Jones
Murder Cakes Of Doom
586
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:31:00 -
[39] - Quote
excillon wrote:
To clarify, I'm not a noob, I played this since the Beta launched, and used the ISK items, so I clearly understand both sides of the argument. I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it.
You obviously don't understand both sides if you're saying " I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it"
BPOs are where they need to be and they don't need anymore. You may say it's not pay2win because there is an isk variant but still. Even though there is an isk variant of everything doesn't eliminate the pay2win argument.
IF Mr. Moneybags comes into the game, he should be able to buy prototype, Adv gear (that are unlimited. keep that in mind) with real money. People with money can just buy all the unlimited gear they want. (It also comes at an earlier level).
More and better aurum gear will just cross that line of pay2win. It will only hurt the game. |
excillon
united we stand x
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:35:00 -
[40] - Quote
Skipper Jones wrote:excillon wrote:
To clarify, I'm not a noob, I played this since the Beta launched, and used the ISK items, so I clearly understand both sides of the argument. I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it.
You obviously don't understand both sides if you're saying " I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it" BPOs are where they need to be and they don't need anymore. You may say it's not pay2win because there is an isk variant but still. Even though there is an isk variant of everything doesn't eliminate the pay2win argument. IF Mr. Moneybags comes into the game, he should be able to buy prototype, Adv gear (that are unlimited. keep that in mind) with real money. People with money can just buy all the unlimited gear they want. (It also comes at an earlier level). More and better aurum gear will just cross that line of pay2win. It will only hurt the game.
But that's how eve works. Or haven't you heard about the 9000 dollar ship?
And for the record, I think the prototype gear is kind of BS although I don't know much about it. I'm talking about like the Sever, Raven, Dragonfly, stuff like that. |
|
Skipper Jones
Murder Cakes Of Doom
586
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:36:00 -
[41] - Quote
excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
2. I'm sick of Iron sights. Why can't I have an A-cog scope to stick on my Toxin AR? Preferably a BPO module.
3. The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high. I regularly get hit from far off distances with it, and that shouldn't happen. Same with Mass Drivers, I just played a match where either someone had rapid fire, or that firing rate needs to be seriously slowed down. I didn't get killed, but watched 4 of my teammates basically get sniped with one, in very quick succession.
4. Where is the armory and user marketplace we keep hearing is coming? If I want to share my equipment with my corp, I should be able to.
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
6. Guys that sit there and camp in insanely high places. There needs to be map limits not just on boundaries on the ground, but up on buildings as well.
7. More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
8. Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. However, for a game that's supposed to cater to people with multiple opinions (BPO's vs. consumables, etc.) it doesn't seem to.
I'll be nicer for you so you won't get offended.
1. I've said my point.... NO 2. Soon. 3.Ummm. Your AR should be the only gun that can pick people at range... 4.Soon. 5 OBs aren't easy to get buddy. Any random bob or kate can't just throw down an orbital. If a squad gets one. They deserve it 6.Makes the game more vertical therefore more interesting. 7. See first point 8. No |
Skipper Jones
Murder Cakes Of Doom
586
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:38:00 -
[42] - Quote
excillon wrote:Skipper Jones wrote:excillon wrote:
To clarify, I'm not a noob, I played this since the Beta launched, and used the ISK items, so I clearly understand both sides of the argument. I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it.
You obviously don't understand both sides if you're saying " I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it" BPOs are where they need to be and they don't need anymore. You may say it's not pay2win because there is an isk variant but still. Even though there is an isk variant of everything doesn't eliminate the pay2win argument. IF Mr. Moneybags comes into the game, he should be able to buy prototype, Adv gear (that are unlimited. keep that in mind) with real money. People with money can just buy all the unlimited gear they want. (It also comes at an earlier level). More and better aurum gear will just cross that line of pay2win. It will only hurt the game. But that's how eve works. Or haven't you heard about the 9000 dollar ship? And for the record, I think the prototype gear is kind of BS although I don't know much about it. I'm talking about like the Sever, Raven, Dragonfly, stuff like that.
Those BPOs are STD for money. BPOs shouldn't go above STD gear.
Did you hear about it blowing up? |
Skipper Jones
Murder Cakes Of Doom
586
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:39:00 -
[43] - Quote
excillon wrote:Skipper Jones wrote:excillon wrote:
To clarify, I'm not a noob, I played this since the Beta launched, and used the ISK items, so I clearly understand both sides of the argument. I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it.
You obviously don't understand both sides if you're saying " I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it" BPOs are where they need to be and they don't need anymore. You may say it's not pay2win because there is an isk variant but still. Even though there is an isk variant of everything doesn't eliminate the pay2win argument. IF Mr. Moneybags comes into the game, he should be able to buy prototype, Adv gear (that are unlimited. keep that in mind) with real money. People with money can just buy all the unlimited gear they want. (It also comes at an earlier level). More and better aurum gear will just cross that line of pay2win. It will only hurt the game. But that's how eve works. Or haven't you heard about the 9000 dollar ship? And for the record, I think the prototype gear is kind of BS although I don't know much about it. I'm talking about like the Sever, Raven, Dragonfly, stuff like that.
Edited post to SHOULDN'T instead of should.
my bad |
excillon
united we stand x
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:40:00 -
[44] - Quote
Skipper Jones wrote:excillon wrote:Skipper Jones wrote:excillon wrote:
To clarify, I'm not a noob, I played this since the Beta launched, and used the ISK items, so I clearly understand both sides of the argument. I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it.
You obviously don't understand both sides if you're saying " I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it" BPOs are where they need to be and they don't need anymore. You may say it's not pay2win because there is an isk variant but still. Even though there is an isk variant of everything doesn't eliminate the pay2win argument. IF Mr. Moneybags comes into the game, he should be able to buy prototype, Adv gear (that are unlimited. keep that in mind) with real money. People with money can just buy all the unlimited gear they want. (It also comes at an earlier level). More and better aurum gear will just cross that line of pay2win. It will only hurt the game. But that's how eve works. Or haven't you heard about the 9000 dollar ship? And for the record, I think the prototype gear is kind of BS although I don't know much about it. I'm talking about like the Sever, Raven, Dragonfly, stuff like that. Those BPOs are STD for money. BPOs should go above STD gear. Did you hear about it blowing up?
Yeah, I laughed. Even a guy like me that buys BPO's thought 9000 is ridiculous.
As for orbitals, I know it's work to get ONE. keyword: one. maybe two. Not four. |
Skipper Jones
Murder Cakes Of Doom
586
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:43:00 -
[45] - Quote
excillon wrote:Skipper Jones wrote:excillon wrote:Skipper Jones wrote:excillon wrote:
To clarify, I'm not a noob, I played this since the Beta launched, and used the ISK items, so I clearly understand both sides of the argument. I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it.
You obviously don't understand both sides if you're saying " I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it" BPOs are where they need to be and they don't need anymore. You may say it's not pay2win because there is an isk variant but still. Even though there is an isk variant of everything doesn't eliminate the pay2win argument. IF Mr. Moneybags comes into the game, he should be able to buy prototype, Adv gear (that are unlimited. keep that in mind) with real money. People with money can just buy all the unlimited gear they want. (It also comes at an earlier level). More and better aurum gear will just cross that line of pay2win. It will only hurt the game. But that's how eve works. Or haven't you heard about the 9000 dollar ship? And for the record, I think the prototype gear is kind of BS although I don't know much about it. I'm talking about like the Sever, Raven, Dragonfly, stuff like that. Those BPOs are STD for money. BPOs should go above STD gear. Did you hear about it blowing up? Yeah, I laughed. Even a guy like me that buys BPO's thought 9000 is ridiculous. As for orbitals, I know it's work to get ONE. keyword: one. maybe two. Not four.
They worked for those 4. They aren't easy to get.
A squad with uplinks, nanohives, defend orders, organization, blah, blah..... They almost SHOULD get those OBs
The good thing is that your team can also get 4 OBs. |
excillon
united we stand x
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:50:00 -
[46] - Quote
True, I just think it should be limited. Like either multiple smaller strikes, or one great big one.
As for the BPO's, I own them all. The reason I do is because when the armory gets started, I want to be able to outfit the members of my corp in BPO gear. I plan on giving away everything except my Toxins, Raven suit, Covenant rifle and Dragonfly scout suit. Partially because I want to give my corp an advantage, but mostly because some of my members can't afford them. I'm not some BPO horder, I'm doing it for a reason. I'm lucky enough to be in a position to do so, I'm just upset at the lack of variety (although I can work with it) and most importantly not being able to share the gear that's sitting there collecting dust (no pun intended). I don't want to P2W, but I'm tired of seeing my corp, which is full of new members, getting slaughtered. I'm not even the corp leader. If CCP wants to draw more users, they need to fix this. |
Sarducar Kahn
xCosmic Voidx The Superpowers
37
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:55:00 -
[47] - Quote
I am pretty sure the 9000$ ship was paid for by actual playtime on many players ingame. The materials and production cost was then converted into plex which was converted into $ just to put a scale on it and make people see how big it was, not because it was bought directly through $ or plex. Eve is not p2w, yes you can buy isk but there is no real advantage to that for long-term players. |
Skipper Jones
Murder Cakes Of Doom
586
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:59:00 -
[48] - Quote
excillon wrote:
True, I just think it should be limited. Like either multiple smaller strikes, or one great big one.
As for the BPO's, I own them all. The reason I do is because when the armory gets started, I want to be able to outfit the members of my corp in BPO gear. I plan on giving away everything except my Toxins, Raven suit, Covenant rifle and Dragonfly scout suit. Partially because I want to give my corp an advantage, but mostly because some of my members can't afford them. I'm not some BPO horder, I'm doing it for a reason. I'm lucky enough to be in a position to do so, I'm just upset at the lack of variety (although I can work with it) and most importantly not being able to share the gear that's sitting there collecting dust (no pun intended). I don't want to P2W, but I'm tired of seeing my corp, which is full of new members, getting slaughtered. I'm not even the corp leader. If CCP wants to draw more users, they need to fix this.
It would be cool to see multiple strikes though. Almost like a war point bank. Would you get 2 small strikes or one big one?
As far as your second note. It's not really something that needs fixed, (unless you're talking about newbies getting slaughtered. Then yes, it needs to be fixed) I don't know how the corp asset things is gonna work (If you can give BPOs) but I see what your doing. People are getting slaughtered so you want to help out with some BPOs because you can... .
That's why BPOs are at the STD level. It gives people a good foothold to learn the game (While using unlimited gear. Therefore the won't have to worry about restocking.). BPOs aren't bad. they just make it so if you have the money, then you can use some OK unlimited gear. Or grind out for GOOD restockable gear.
I think what you REALLY want is the ability to trade items. You have the money to give players BPOs and you want to give your guys Good BPOs instead of OK ones. |
excillon
united we stand x
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 08:59:00 -
[49] - Quote
Sarducar Kahn wrote:I am pretty sure the 9000$ ship was paid for by actual playtime on many players ingame. The materials and production cost was then converted into plex which was converted into $ just to put a scale on it and make people see how big it was, not because it was bought directly through $ or plex. Eve is not p2w, yes you can buy isk but there is no real advantage to that for long-term players.
Thank you for explaining, the article I read online didn't go into that. But then, I've never played EVE and I'm just learning about how it works. |
excillon
united we stand x
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 09:04:00 -
[50] - Quote
Skipper Jones wrote:excillon wrote:
True, I just think it should be limited. Like either multiple smaller strikes, or one great big one.
As for the BPO's, I own them all. The reason I do is because when the armory gets started, I want to be able to outfit the members of my corp in BPO gear. I plan on giving away everything except my Toxins, Raven suit, Covenant rifle and Dragonfly scout suit. Partially because I want to give my corp an advantage, but mostly because some of my members can't afford them. I'm not some BPO horder, I'm doing it for a reason. I'm lucky enough to be in a position to do so, I'm just upset at the lack of variety (although I can work with it) and most importantly not being able to share the gear that's sitting there collecting dust (no pun intended). I don't want to P2W, but I'm tired of seeing my corp, which is full of new members, getting slaughtered. I'm not even the corp leader. If CCP wants to draw more users, they need to fix this.
It would be cool to see multiple strikes though. Almost like a war point bank. Would you get 2 small strikes or one big one? As far as your second note. It's not really something that needs fixed, (unless you're talking about newbies getting slaughtered. Then yes, it needs to be fixed) I don't know how the corp asset things is gonna work (If you can give BPOs) but I see what your doing. People are getting slaughtered so you want to help out with some BPOs because you can... . That's why BPOs are at the STD level. It gives people a good foothold to learn the game (While using unlimited gear. Therefore the won't have to worry about restocking.). BPOs aren't bad. they just make it so if you have the money, then you can use some OK unlimited gear. Or grind out for GOOD restockable gear. I think what you REALLY want is the ability to trade items. You have the money to give players BPOs and you want to give your guys Good BPOs instead of OK ones.
Exactly. My corp and I are close, we play on multiple games, we're all friends. I just want to see them have a fair shot. They didn't play the beta, and I'm the one who brought them into this game. They like it, I just want to see them do well. I guess I should have explained that in my 1st post. We're all guys with jobs, lives, families, and can't sit on dust for 12 hours a day.
|
|
Vaux Karn
The Mercenary Collective
29
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 09:47:00 -
[51] - Quote
excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
1. My zero SP requirement BPOs that I paid money for should be better than prototype weapons that require around 1mil SP.
2. All my guns should have scopes because I played too much CoD.
3. People around me and I got killed or just hit by something that isn't an AR...NERF IT!
4. Merc market, I WANT IT NOW!
5. I got killed by an OB, the other team had a good squad, NERF IT!
6. I got sniped by a sniper, NERF IT!
7. After you make BPOs the best thing in the game, give me one for everything so I never have to skill into anyhting and can always win!
8. Everyone should have to play the game just like I do or I will whine and cry until my mommy makes you do what I say!
Overall, I like this game. But my parents always give me my way, so this game should too!
Fixed that post OP...now everyone can see you for the spoiled QQing brat that you are. |
castba
Penguin's March
47
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 10:52:00 -
[52] - Quote
Guessing this guy didn't read the whole thread... |
Dimitri Rascolovitch
The Immortal Knights
20
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 11:16:00 -
[53] - Quote
you want a free to play game to become a pay to win game, gtfho scrub, delete your dust character, delete dust from your ps3 and never disgrace this forum with your presence |
Karl Koekwaus
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
152
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 12:14:00 -
[54] - Quote
excillon wrote: 1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
excillon wrote: I don't want to P2W
So you want to be able to pay money and be better than anything, but you don't want P2W?
Please explain yourself, it seems you're hopelessly confused right now
Keep digging that hole.... |
broonfondle majikthies
P.O.N.A.G.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
87
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 12:28:00 -
[55] - Quote
10/10 for style Minus several million for good thinking |
Cross Atu
Conspiratus Immortalis Covert Intervention
1391
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 12:43:00 -
[56] - Quote
1. I love my BPOs, I actually think their presence in the game is a net positive for Dust, yes even in New Eden. I do the "collector" thing and have gathered almost all of them. All of that having been said I must respond NO! to your suggestion. BPOs should be STD and MLIT levels nothing above ever. Also AUR gear in general should at no time have versions that are better than their ISK variants. Just because I'm willing to throw IRL money at the game doesn't mean that others should have to just to compete. That would kill the game.
2.Some guns don't have them, CCP has said their looking at scop mods for a later release but that those mods will be keyed to racial types so you may or may not be in luck. As to the BPO mods... eeeh, we'll have to see how they work when they come out before we can see if that's a viable option.
3. Both shotty and MD have character skills that effect their performance and rely heavily on positioning to be effective. I've tested both extensively and see no reason for a change at this point... after all at this point the double melee [bug?] is more deadly in CQC than the shotty.
4. +1 on this, I know it's a complex feature but sooner rather than later CCP.
5. Two things here, first you're talking about Precision Strikes unless you're playing PC or FW with active EVE support in the sky. I know they both kill from above and cost 2500 WP to use but they're not actually the same thing. Second 2500 WP is fine, this was tested in closed beta and the number established as a baseline. If one squad can earn 10k WP then 4 OB/PS is quite fair, also don't clump up and those strikes won't be such a problem. The active squads I run in know when we're risking that strike, sometimes its worth the risk and sometimes we spread out more, it's a tactical trade off.
6. Buy a militia DS and go hot drop them or crush them. Alternately buy a sniper rifle (you have a covenant right?) and snipe them. I've had great success with both. Failing those just work around their ZoC and leave them haning with nothing to do.
7. Sure I can support this for meta 1 and below only. Anything more and your degrading game quality and balance. P2W is not a good way to run a game.
8. There are no "PC users", if you'd like that to change asked Sony. That being said I'll assume you mean KBM users. Separating players by input device isn't a good call for a number of reasons even if this weren't a sandbox game. Since it is a sandbox game that sort of thing is directly in conflict with the fundamental nature of the game.
I'm glad you like the game, I hope you continue to like and play the game but there's something we should clear up. The game caters to player innovation, players making meaningful persistent choices, player specialization, and yes some diverse methods of play. What it doesn't offer, and has never offered, is player "difficulty options" there is no slider for easy/medium/hard. This is all one world (though you can choose where to fight in it) and some things have too great an impact on the world in general to count as just a difference of opinion or play style. P2W, high meta BPOs, and unlimited respecs all fall into that "too far to be viable" category.
0.02 ISK Cross |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
3502
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 15:08:00 -
[57] - Quote
Dog Merc wrote:Cyrille Fodeux wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:The market will come. The problem is Eve Online. DUST's market will merge with the Eve market.
Eve Online has an economy and market that is so complex, yet so successful, that Guild Wars II tried to adopt the system. Eve's economy is considered to be the most robust and the most stable in the entire mmo industry. It-¦s so complex my geopraphy teacher even referred to it as the best example for a free enterprise economy. You joking? Lulz. So many lulz.
This is no joke. Look at Eve Online for yourself if you don't believe me. The whole thing is one giant ecosystem of its own. There is no other mmo like it in the world. |
Cyrille Fodeux
DUST University Ivy League
50
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 16:36:00 -
[58] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Dog Merc wrote:Cyrille Fodeux wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:The market will come. The problem is Eve Online. DUST's market will merge with the Eve market.
Eve Online has an economy and market that is so complex, yet so successful, that Guild Wars II tried to adopt the system. Eve's economy is considered to be the most robust and the most stable in the entire mmo industry. It-¦s so complex my geopraphy teacher even referred to it as the best example for a free enterprise economy. You joking? Lulz. So many lulz. This is no joke. Look at Eve Online for yourself if you don't believe me. The whole thing is one giant ecosystem of its own. There is no other mmo like it in the world.
That's no joke. He plays since six years and he played EVE for a whole lesson to show it. |
Dog Merc
Sebiestor Field Sappers Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 17:44:00 -
[59] - Quote
Cyrille Fodeux wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Dog Merc wrote:Cyrille Fodeux wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:The market will come. The problem is Eve Online. DUST's market will merge with the Eve market.
Eve Online has an economy and market that is so complex, yet so successful, that Guild Wars II tried to adopt the system. Eve's economy is considered to be the most robust and the most stable in the entire mmo industry. It-¦s so complex my geopraphy teacher even referred to it as the best example for a free enterprise economy. You joking? Lulz. So many lulz. This is no joke. Look at Eve Online for yourself if you don't believe me. The whole thing is one giant ecosystem of its own. There is no other mmo like it in the world. That's no joke. He plays since six years and he played EVE for a whole lesson to show it. I wish I had a geo teacher like that.. |
Demon Buddah
The Phoenix Federation
50
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 18:13:00 -
[60] - Quote
Quote: I guess I'm going to take the time to address everyone individually.
Who are you to tell me to get out what Dust needs or doesn't? Again, people like me pay for this game so people like you can play it.
To clarify, I'm not a noob, I played this since the Beta launched, and used the ISK items, so I clearly understand both sides of the argument. I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it. I understand buying stuff with money helps the game, I even do it for the boosters. BUT don't ask for more BPO, they sure as hell don't need to be stronger. If you've played the game since beta, then you understand this game needs risk because that's what gives it it's uniqueness and make it a bigger challenge.
Quote: But that's how eve works. Or haven't you heard about the 9000 dollar ship? While EVE does have a lot of BPO it requires more than just owning the BPO to use it like in Dust. In EVE you have to have different minerals and a set of skills to create what the BPO is, in Dust all you have to do is own the BPO. |
|
Waruiko DUST
G I A N T EoN.
118
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 18:25:00 -
[61] - Quote
Not sure if troll or just stupid... |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
3504
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 18:54:00 -
[62] - Quote
Demon Buddah wrote:Quote: But that's how eve works. Or haven't you heard about the 9000 dollar ship? While EVE does have a lot of BPO it requires more than just owning the BPO to use it like in Dust. In EVE you have to have different minerals and a set of skills to create what the BPO is, in Dust all you have to do is own the BPO.
I'm going to take this quote and emphasize it further by saying that it takes far more than acquiring minerals and skills to produce what the BPO requires.
You will also need access to station services that have available production slots. If you are in high-sec space and don't have your own player-owned structure (POS) that is used for production, then you are stuck waiting in a queue that can take hours or days to even let you get started with production.
There are also standings that you need to grind up via mission running if you want to get a better deal like lowered production fees that the stations charge you every time you use a slot. Those standings take a very long time to grind up as you have to spend hours each day for weeks (if not months) on end trying to build up the proper standings needs to get those good deals.
If you run your own corp and you have enough security standings with Concord, you can then establish your own POS in high-sec that can be used for production and avoid the long queues and hefty fees. But you are responsible for maintaining that POS by refilling it with fuel which costs ISK and fitting it with the proper modules which by themselves also cost ISK. There is also the inherent risk of dealing with opposing corps that declare war against you and your POS every now and then and you have to defend that POS which also costs ISK because of the ships and people you need to defend it.
As you can see, it's not that simple in Eve when it comes to BPOs. Demon is right in that Dust BPOs don't require any of this... for now.
I say "for now" because CCP already has plans to implement an industry of sorts which will involve Eve Online players handling the production side of things while Dust players handle the acquisition of the minerals needed for production. |
TechMechMeds
Swamp Marines
158
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 20:12:00 -
[63] - Quote
Your a Fking idiot. Not only did you agree to the certificate but you can also see stats of items, you ripped yourself off. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
3506
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 22:29:00 -
[64] - Quote
Welcome to New Eden. Where risk-aversed players are not welcomed. The exit is that way. You can leave at any time. Just don't expect sympathy from us when you do leave. You are no different than the whiners who whined about Eve Online having too much risk because they are not able to AFK in their mining barge for hours on end without some outlaw player ganking them in high-sec or unable to avoid the scams that are rampant in the game because they are too lazy to read the details of the contract they accepted before accepting it.
If you don't like risk, too ******* bad. You can go ahead and cry me a river, Justin Timberlake. |
excillon
united we stand x
4
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 00:25:00 -
[65] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Welcome to New Eden. Where risk-aversed players are not welcomed. The exit is that way. You can leave at any time. Just don't expect sympathy from us when you do leave. You are no different than the whiners who whined about Eve Online having too much risk because they are not able to AFK in their mining barge for hours on end without some outlaw player ganking them in high-sec or unable to avoid the scams that are rampant in the game because they are too lazy to read the details of the contract they accepted before accepting it.
If you don't like risk, too ******* bad. You can go ahead and cry me a river, Justin Timberlake.
Well, I'm not leaving. So you'll just have to deal with me, and those like me who have an alternate point of view. I suggest you get used to it. As I said, I'm not the only one.
So I guess we can make a deal, I'll cry you a river but if you want to bring popular songs into it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V06TXd8CwRI
And if you're still not following:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWmmPMuBgjA |
excillon
united we stand x
4
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 00:45:00 -
[66] - Quote
Karl Koekwaus wrote:excillon wrote: 1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
excillon wrote: I don't want to P2W
So you want to be able to pay money and be better than anything, but you don't want P2W? Please explain yourself, it seems you're hopelessly confused right now Keep digging that hole....
I meant comparable. The reason all the ISK people get pissed off about BPO's is because it's not fair that people play who play for free and play a lot using ISK don't think it's fair that someone can walk in, buy BPO's, and be just as good. Yet some people like me who buy gear don't think it's fair that people who sit on here for hours and have the time to do so have the clear advantage over those of us with lives, families, and careers. So what if we buy gear that we don't lose.
Who's digging the hole here? The entire complaint on BPO's is it's not fair to ISK people, yet spending thousands of hours on here isn't fair to the ones who can't. You know what I think? I think the hardcore users are simply afraid that someone can buy a few bundles, and be equal to them. So now who's spoiled and entitled?
If you had bothered to read any of the other posts, you would have seen me already present this argument. I'm GLAD that BPO people threaten the system. It's keeping new players from getting slaughtered. I'm all for it, and I want to see them even more powerful. And I'm willing to bet that as this game goes on, if the Elite bundle is any inclination, it will go that way when CCP realizes how much money it can generate off them. I think most of the other users do, and that's why they are so against BPO's in general. I don't mind P2W systems, because I don't see it that way. I see it as pay to completely customize and have some nice gear that I don't lose. As I said in my OP, that's the way the world works, as cold as it may be. If someone inherits a bunch of money and doesn't have to work, or someone has a good paying job, you should be happy for them. You don't hate someone driving past you in a Ferrari on the same road you're driving your Ford Focus on, and the same principle applies here with what I'm saying. That's life. Maybe you had to work to have that Focus, and the other guy was just given that Ferrari. No one's knocking you for having a Ford, just don't beat up on the guys that have the resources to have better or more of something. It's capitalism, and it's been around for a while. I suggest you read up on it. |
FLAYLOCK Steve
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
73
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 00:55:00 -
[67] - Quote
CLONE117 wrote:mass driver does need a reduction in rof..
it fires to fast for a nade launcher... It's already a slow enough. |
Pugnacious Turtle
Pugnacious Anencephalous
15
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 00:56:00 -
[68] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:To me, and yes I'm going to say it, this sounds like yet another AR user complaining that he can't kill everything all the time with his trusty AR. Well, OP, we're pretty close to the point where you can.
Once the AR users get everything they want I'm out. This game is already on the verge of being Call of Duty in space. I really hope CCP comes to their senses and starts to balance out the AR.
And... to the OP... please don't post to the forums anymore. Your brand of reasoning is toxic. |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
46
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 00:58:00 -
[69] - Quote
excillon wrote:Skipper Jones wrote:excillon wrote:
To clarify, I'm not a noob, I played this since the Beta launched, and used the ISK items, so I clearly understand both sides of the argument. I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it.
You obviously don't understand both sides if you're saying " I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it" BPOs are where they need to be and they don't need anymore. You may say it's not pay2win because there is an isk variant but still. Even though there is an isk variant of everything doesn't eliminate the pay2win argument. IF Mr. Moneybags comes into the game, he should be able to buy prototype, Adv gear (that are unlimited. keep that in mind) with real money. People with money can just buy all the unlimited gear they want. (It also comes at an earlier level). More and better aurum gear will just cross that line of pay2win. It will only hurt the game. But that's how eve works. Or haven't you heard about the 9000 dollar ship? And for the record, I think the prototype gear is kind of BS although I don't know much about it. I'm talking about like the Sever, Raven, Dragonfly, stuff like that.
i am still reading so i dont know if anyone addressed the "thats how eve works" statement... you obviously dont know how EVE works and dont even realize that the $9000 ship was:
1) Guess what? piloted by someone who had to have played or at least had an active account for more than a year... i would say regardless of how he got that ship, he put in over a year to fully fit and fly it, not to mention get the isk to pay for it. 2) payed for with isk, that was made in game, not bought, they were using $9000 as an example. for example; if he would have bought this ship with the going market prices of PLEX then it would have taken $9000.
Maybe you should read the articles that you try to cite.
Maybe you should not throw out a bunch of bull-**** and expect other players of the same game not to notice all the bull-****
|
Karl Koekwaus
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
154
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 01:38:00 -
[70] - Quote
excillon wrote:I meant comparable.
excillon wrote: If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't.
That is not what you say though.
excillon wrote: Yet some people like me who buy gear don't think it's fair that people who sit on here for hours and have the time to do so have the clear advantage over those of us with lives, families, and careers.
Get rid of the wife and kids then if you want to be an internet superhero, just like the winners. It's easier to lose friends than it is to make them.
excillon wrote: Who's digging the hole here? The entire complaint on BPO's is it's not fair to ISK people, yet spending thousands of hours on here isn't fair to the ones who can't. You know what I think? I think the hardcore users are simply afraid that someone can buy a few bundles, and be equal to them. So now who's spoiled and entitled?
Still you, as you make perfectly clear by this post. and every other post you made in this thread.
excillon wrote: If you had bothered to read any of the other posts, you would have seen me already present this argument. I'm GLAD that BPO people threaten the system. It's keeping new players from getting slaughtered. I'm all for it, and I want to see them even more powerful. And I'm willing to bet that as this game goes on, if the Elite bundle is any inclination, it will go that way when CCP realizes how much money it can generate off them. I think most of the other users do, and that's why they are so against BPO's in general. I don't mind P2W systems, because I don't see it that way. I see it as pay to completely customize and have some nice gear that I don't lose. As I said in my OP, that's the way the world works, as cold as it may be. If someone inherits a bunch of money and doesn't have to work, or someone has a good paying job, you should be happy for them. You don't hate someone driving past you in a Ferrari on the same road you're driving your Ford Focus on, and the same principle applies here with what I'm saying. That's life. Maybe you had to work to have that Focus, and the other guy was just given that Ferrari. No one's knocking you for having a Ford, just don't beat up on the guys that have the resources to have better or more of something. It's capitalism, and it's been around for a while. I suggest you read up on it.
So you you say again you want P2W again, after stating you don't want P2W.
BPO's are actually bad for business for CCP since you only have to buy them once. Aur BPC's are much better in the long run since you'll have to keep buying them. But since I don't know how capitalism works, I'm sure you've seen through this already . Games are nice, because they can equalize the playing field by giving everyone the same tools and let skills do the work.
Why are you so upset you can't compete with students and the unemployed? You say the world is harsh and people should be punished for having other priorities and now you want to be able to mitigate having chosen different priorities so you somehow can still be good? Someone with family and a career is too old for reaction wise to play a competitive game in the first place as they generally lack APM.
If we can suggest stuff to each other, I would recommend some lower education for you. Reading/Writing comprehension, a quick guide formulating thoughts, logical thinking and reasoning might in in your best interest to train.
Your reasoning keeps going in haywire. You want P2W items, but you don't want P2W items, you just want to win against people in Proto suits and you can't because you don't have P2W items and people in Proto suits have no jobs but have skill and the world is a hard place because there are no P2W items in Dust?
This might be the most entertaining 'CCP I WANT TO PAY MONEY BECAUSE I DONT KNOW HOW TO PLAY GAMES AND I CANT BE BOTHERED TO LEARN' whine I've ever seen posted on forums. |
|
Pugnacious Turtle
Pugnacious Anencephalous
15
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 01:46:00 -
[71] - Quote
FLAYLOCK Steve wrote:CLONE117 wrote:mass driver does need a reduction in rof..
it fires to fast for a nade launcher... It's already a slow enough.
It needs a nerf.... right along with the assault rifle.
|
Demon Buddah
The Phoenix Federation
50
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 02:30:00 -
[72] - Quote
Quote: And I'm willing to bet that as this game goes on, if the Elite bundle is any inclination, it will go that way when CCP realizes how much money it can generate off them. I think most of the other users do, and that's why they are so against BPO's in general. One reason EVE is one of the most successful MMOs ever is because it isn't pay to win. You could play most MMO's and more than likely it's going to be a pay to win game. It's the same with Dust. If Dust ever came to be that way NO ONE would play it anymore. Even if it's a free game. Why do we have to pay to win in a video game? They have already lost some people because of the fused grenade (before the nerf) was a pay to win item.
Dust and EVE are both unique because of the risk. They give these packs so then they have a way to finance the game. The packs might come with permanent weapons but you don't get a too unfair advantage, not even with the Elite pack.
Who wants to play a game when only the people who have money can win? There are some people who don't have a lot of money, but the parents will buy their kids stuff like a PS3 so they can have fun. And I will say, Dust is probably the best option for video games right now I'm being straight up. You can pay for these packs or Aurum but you don't have to. These updates might screw up the games sometimes, but you don't have to worry about paying for DLC's. You get all this new content for free. That's freaking cool of CCP to do that.
You want to talk about fair? Why should someone with money get special treatment? They might have jobs, and can't keep up with people but it's a game. It's not their life. There are people in my corp who have jobs and can't play a whole lot. But you know what? They sure kick ass when they are on. And they use ISK gear.
This game will get better and more balanced and fixed. And people will look at this game and see it's free AND not pay to win. If Dust ever does become pay to win, myself, and almost ALL Dust players will move on. Because we don't want that. Dust will die if they turn into that. Just as EVE would if it were to become pay to win.
|
Bulldozza Smash
Ultramarine Corp
2
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 05:32:00 -
[73] - Quote
excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
2. I'm sick of Iron sights. Why can't I have an A-cog scope to stick on my Toxin AR? Preferably a BPO module.
3. The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high. I regularly get hit from far off distances with it, and that shouldn't happen. Same with Mass Drivers, I just played a match where either someone had rapid fire, or that firing rate needs to be seriously slowed down. I didn't get killed, but watched 4 of my teammates basically get sniped with one, in very quick succession.
4. Where is the armory and user marketplace we keep hearing is coming? If I want to share my equipment with my corp, I should be able to.
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
6. Guys that sit there and camp in insanely high places. There needs to be map limits not just on boundaries on the ground, but up on buildings as well.
7. More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
8. Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. However, for a game that's supposed to cater to people with multiple opinions (BPO's vs. consumables, etc.) it doesn't seem to.
LMFAO firstly bud if you want the extreme advantage for using real world money go play one of those asian created online micro sale games where you real world money to do any good.
Secondly mate the whole idea of the AUR weapons is to allow to to use weapon with out the required skill dont you listen to the annoying woman when your on the battle barge she is like a bloody infomercial.
As for you crying about orbital strikes, its all depends on how well the squad is doing the more WP the more orbitals there is nothing unfair about it.
Those mass drivers are balanced and there ROF is slow which doesn't need to be changed lol.
The armoury is coming in due time.
Yet the thing that i find really funny is you having a cry about ARs without ACOG scopes... burst and tac have scopes... if you can't kill someone with an AR at range when they have an icon above there head and your AR barely moves when fired add the fact that you have 60 rounds (which is enough to drop a heavy) i want be the first to say it 'damn boy get good or change weapon'
sure there were other crying points i missed but honestly this child should not being posting his bs, you are not entitled to better weapon blueprints through AUR. THIS IS A GAME OF TEAM WORK, TACTICS & SKILL you earn the right to weld the better... so earn it.
Bulldozza Smash CEO Ultramarine Corp
|
E-Rock
Ultramarine Corp
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 06:36:00 -
[74] - Quote
This guy can't be serious. LMFAO |
Mac 3030
Ultramarine Corp
0
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 13:40:00 -
[75] - Quote
This guy just wants to troll around and stomp noobs all day long. |
Jane Madson
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
23
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 00:42:00 -
[76] - Quote
I'm 42, married with 2 kids and work 50 hrs a week. I play this game because its not pay to win. I dont need bto items to be good. Just need a good squad, common sense and a besire to kick ass. I also have spec in to proto heavy, hmg and complex modules. All isk variants. You should really go back to playing kingdoms of camelot or another of those p2w games that spam your facebook account, those are more suited for your skill lvl which must be none. |
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F
1339
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 01:17:00 -
[77] - Quote
in #1 u say if I have money to use in dust i should get better gear and if someone else doesn't its their problem
well if someone has more sp from actually putting time in when u can't it is your problem |
ALPHA DECRIPTER
M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
230
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 01:24:00 -
[78] - Quote
excillon wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Welcome to New Eden. Where risk-aversed players are not welcomed. The exit is that way. You can leave at any time. Just don't expect sympathy from us when you do leave. You are no different than the whiners who whined about Eve Online having too much risk because they are not able to AFK in their mining barge for hours on end without some outlaw player ganking them in high-sec or unable to avoid the scams that are rampant in the game because they are too lazy to read the details of the contract they accepted before accepting it.
If you don't like risk, too ******* bad. You can go ahead and cry me a river, Justin Timberlake. Well, I'm not leaving. So you'll just have to deal with me, and those like me who have an alternate point of view. I suggest you get used to it. As I said, I'm not the only one. So I guess we can make a deal, I'll cry you a river but if you want to bring popular songs into it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V06TXd8CwRIAnd if you're still not following: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWmmPMuBgjA
You're still here? After all the bashing I thought you would be gone by now. Respect. Wanting to help out your corp using BPO's is admirable to say the least. Many corps would be better off to have players with the same mind set as you.
AUR items being better then ISK is not going to happen 'cause it's against CCP's plans for the future but after reading through this thread I can understand how you feel. You don't seem to be in an alliance and ours could use you. We are happy to help the newer players in anyway we can. (Actually spent nearly an hour in merc quarters trying to explain the game to a newb. We also helped him decide which role he was going to take on.)
`Sigh. Just another fun game of DUST . |
Jammer Jalapeno
BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate
51
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 03:06:00 -
[79] - Quote
excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
2. I'm sick of Iron sights. Why can't I have an A-cog scope to stick on my Toxin AR? Preferably a BPO module.
3. The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high. I regularly get hit from far off distances with it, and that shouldn't happen. Same with Mass Drivers, I just played a match where either someone had rapid fire, or that firing rate needs to be seriously slowed down. I didn't get killed, but watched 4 of my teammates basically get sniped with one, in very quick succession.
4. Where is the armory and user marketplace we keep hearing is coming? If I want to share my equipment with my corp, I should be able to.
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
6. Guys that sit there and camp in insanely high places. There needs to be map limits not just on boundaries on the ground, but up on buildings as well.
7. More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
8. Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. However, for a game that's supposed to cater to people with multiple opinions (BPO's vs. consumables, etc.) it doesn't seem to.
Wow dude that is an awful lot of bitching.....perhaps you should play something else LOL
|
excillon
united we stand x
6
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 09:29:00 -
[80] - Quote
To be fair, I'm a numbers guy. English was never my strong point. I should have chosen my words more carefully, as I read my original post, I realize I didn't clarify things enough. I'm not backtracking by any means, I still feel the same. Basically, all I'm asking for is a level playing field. Multiple ways for hardcore and casual users to go at it, without one having a distinct advantage over the other. Maybe I don't have the time to spend playing that others do, that's unfair to me. Maybe it's not fair I simply buy weapons to eliminate risk and give me an advantage. Again, all I ask is level the playing field, in the spirit of fair competition for all.
And for the record, I have a very high level of education. I'm guessing that English isn't your thing either, since my "reasoning going in haywire" makes no sense. I'd point out the lack of punctuation, but I'd sound like my 3rd grade teacher. So lets not throw stones. A level playing field, and people to quit griping about people like me who buy BPO's, and gripe out BPO's in general because they're "ruining the game", when I'm sure a significant handful of them are just upset they can't afford them. |
|
excillon
united we stand x
6
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 09:40:00 -
[81] - Quote
ALPHA DECRIPTER wrote:excillon wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Welcome to New Eden. Where risk-aversed players are not welcomed. The exit is that way. You can leave at any time. Just don't expect sympathy from us when you do leave. You are no different than the whiners who whined about Eve Online having too much risk because they are not able to AFK in their mining barge for hours on end without some outlaw player ganking them in high-sec or unable to avoid the scams that are rampant in the game because they are too lazy to read the details of the contract they accepted before accepting it.
If you don't like risk, too ******* bad. You can go ahead and cry me a river, Justin Timberlake. Well, I'm not leaving. So you'll just have to deal with me, and those like me who have an alternate point of view. I suggest you get used to it. As I said, I'm not the only one. So I guess we can make a deal, I'll cry you a river but if you want to bring popular songs into it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V06TXd8CwRIAnd if you're still not following: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWmmPMuBgjA You're still here? After all the bashing I thought you would be gone by now. Respect. Wanting to help out your corp using BPO's is admirable to say the least. Many corps would be better off to have players with the same mind set as you. AUR items being better then ISK is not going to happen 'cause it's against CCP's plans for the future but after reading through this thread I can understand how you feel. You don't seem to be in an alliance and ours could use you. We are happy to help the newer players in anyway we can. (Actually spent nearly an hour in merc quarters trying to explain the game to a newb. We also helped him decide which role he was going to take on.)
`Sigh. Just another fun game of DUST .
Thanks. I know my opinion isn't a popular one, but I'm stubborn. I stick to my guns. My corp would gladly take the help. We've got about 40 members across 4 different games, and we're slowly bringing them in here. I'm blessed to be in a financial situation where I have the money to help outfit my corp when the armory gets up and running. Part of the original post, actually most of it, is frustration on things seemingly moving so slowly. What drew me to this game was the depth, above games like Battlefield or Killzone. No one likes seeing their members beat up on by guys who are way more powerful, and losing their ISK items on top of it. Hence, why I began my BPO purchasing blitz. I watched one of my Corp guys lose every single one of his Nova knives he's saved for because a guy from subdreddit (who shall remain nameless) decided to camp on top of a building only accessible by dropship and snipe with a Thale at the only spawn point we had left, the MCC. It was a public battle, and we were losing badly already. In my mind, that was just absolutely classless. I don't care if it's winning, they'd won anyway. What that was amounted to nothing more than bullying. Granted, it was only one member of that group (the others I've met seem pretty cool), but still. We're not exactly noobs, as I mentioned I played the Beta along with many others, and there's a guy in our corp who's pretty smart at figuring this stuff out. I appreciate the help offer, and will absolutely take you up on it once the stupid mic bug clears up.
For the record, I already admitted I chose my words badly. I meant comparable, not superior. Like a BPO equivalent of the GEK, etc. |
excillon
united we stand x
6
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 09:51:00 -
[82] - Quote
double post |
Starscream 12
Demon's Forge
4
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 11:53:00 -
[83] - Quote
excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high.
Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that.
OP shotgun range, **** off its **** now it used to be amazing and worth skilling into.
OBs come from team work or carrying the **** out of a match, dont like it get good and get your own OBs.
Less BPOs, only give standard BPOs, **** your money you filthy little ***** its annoying enough people have to work for ISK to pay for proto gear and others fags like you just spend money to keep your suits stocked since youre too **** to stop dying and save ISK.
KB/M user do not have advantage over controller, you will come across those better with KB/M and those better with controller, it all comes down to skill.
Overall you're a whiny little ***** who wants whatever she sees with daddys money, and you have no right to an opinion. |
excillon
united we stand x
7
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:07:00 -
[84] - Quote
Starscream 12 wrote:excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high.
Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. OP shotgun range, **** off its **** now it used to be amazing and worth skilling into. OBs come from team work or carrying the **** out of a match, dont like it get good and get your own OBs. Less BPOs, only give standard BPOs, **** your money you filthy little ***** its annoying enough people have to work for ISK to pay for proto gear and others fags like you just spend money to keep your suits stocked since youre too **** to stop dying and save ISK. KB/M user do not have advantage over controller, you will come across those better with KB/M and those better with controller, it all comes down to skill. Overall you're a whiny little ***** who wants whatever she sees with daddys money, and you have no right to an opinion.
And you sir, are obviously not worth my time. For one, you're obviously a bigot. "Fags"? Really? Welcome to the 21st century, time to come out of the 80's and evolve with the rest of us. Now, I'm not gay, I'm married, but I'm glad you commented on my sexual orientation. I'm sure you're lonely and looking to project your own preferences off on someone else, but I don't swing that way. Not offended if you do though, since you're obviously just dealing with your own closeted self loathing. Hope you work it out, I'm not a therapist so I can't really help you out with that. Sorry.
Now, to address your point, people work in real life for the money to buy that gear, or have it. I have a good job with great pay, and work hard for the money I use to buy bundles. So how is that any different? Because I didn't do it on Dust? Well, I'm sorry, but I simply don't have time to play as much as I'd like because I have to work.
Oh, and by the way: Starscream was a punk and a sissy, who if I remember correctly, was punked by Megatron constantly and got lit up into something crispy by Galvatron. So I find your screen name not only funny, but fitting as well. |
v4victory
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
23
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:34:00 -
[85] - Quote
excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
2. I'm sick of Iron sights. Why can't I have an A-cog scope to stick on my Toxin AR? Preferably a BPO module.
3. The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high. I regularly get hit from far off distances with it, and that shouldn't happen. Same with Mass Drivers, I just played a match where either someone had rapid fire, or that firing rate needs to be seriously slowed down. I didn't get killed, but watched 4 of my teammates basically get sniped with one, in very quick succession.
4. Where is the armory and user marketplace we keep hearing is coming? If I want to share my equipment with my corp, I should be able to.
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
6. Guys that sit there and camp in insanely high places. There needs to be map limits not just on boundaries on the ground, but up on buildings as well.
7. More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
8. Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. However, for a game that's supposed to cater to people with multiple opinions (BPO's vs. consumables, etc.) it doesn't seem to.
okay 2 things where oribitals are 2500 wp's for a squad then the squad leader calls in the orbital strike now it sucks being on the recieving end but you cant take away peoples reward for doing teamwork or having alot of skill or spending alot of time playing the game and having squads of proto gear to stomp on people now having other options besides just orbital strikes like bombing runs or selecting turret or instaltion drop ins would make the game have more options but at the end of the day it will be orbitals cause there reliable and give a ton of kills
now on the the bpp thing guess what there needs to be adv and proto bpos every module weapon suit vehical turret all need bpos that way the people who want to say donate 10 bucks to the game to get a proto large blaster turret bpo can so that cuts the cost of there tank down by almost 1 million isk will it break the game hell no cause look at blood raiders saga look at ishakona watch sage there not breaking the game and there bpo lavs now as a player who has bought every merc pack that s in the game and also has almost all the bpos available i can tell you yes there is a few people that would but there isnt many that will spend the money to buy it when they can just get it for free
and before you wanna add more rage remember raven assault sever logistics suit both require med dropsuit skill lev 3 and here racial verient skil lev 1 in order to use the bpo they purcheased and guess what they never broke the game so having a proto suit dont mean you dont need any sp to wear it you still need the skills your just buying the right to have infenite of them so you can spend your isk on other things
|
excillon
united we stand x
7
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:38:00 -
[86] - Quote
v4victory wrote:excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
2. I'm sick of Iron sights. Why can't I have an A-cog scope to stick on my Toxin AR? Preferably a BPO module.
3. The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high. I regularly get hit from far off distances with it, and that shouldn't happen. Same with Mass Drivers, I just played a match where either someone had rapid fire, or that firing rate needs to be seriously slowed down. I didn't get killed, but watched 4 of my teammates basically get sniped with one, in very quick succession.
4. Where is the armory and user marketplace we keep hearing is coming? If I want to share my equipment with my corp, I should be able to.
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
6. Guys that sit there and camp in insanely high places. There needs to be map limits not just on boundaries on the ground, but up on buildings as well.
7. More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
8. Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. However, for a game that's supposed to cater to people with multiple opinions (BPO's vs. consumables, etc.) it doesn't seem to. okay 2 things where oribitals are 2500 wp's for a squad then the squad leader calls in the orbital strike now it sucks being on the recieving end but you cant take away peoples reward for doing teamwork or having alot of skill or spending alot of time playing the game and having squads of proto gear to stomp on people now having other options besides just orbital strikes like bombing runs or selecting turret or instaltion drop ins would make the game have more options but at the end of the day it will be orbitals cause there reliable and give a ton of kills now on the the bpp thing guess what there needs to be adv and proto bpos every module weapon suit vehical turret all need bpos that way the people who want to say donate 10 bucks to the game to get a proto large blaster turret bpo can so that cuts the cost of there tank down by almost 1 million isk will it break the game hell no cause look at blood raiders saga look at ishakona watch sage there not breaking the game and there bpo lavs now as a player who has bought every merc pack that s in the game and also has almost all the bpos available i can tell you yes there is a few people that would but there isnt many that will spend the money to buy it when they can just get it for free and before you wanna add more rage remember raven assault sever logistics suit both require med dropsuit skill lev 3 and here racial verient skil lev 1 in order to use the bpo they purcheased and guess what they never broke the game so having a proto suit dont mean you dont need any sp to wear it you still need the skills your just buying the right to have infenite of them so you can spend your isk on other things
Good points. Thanks man. |
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
441
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 10:48:00 -
[87] - Quote
v4victory wrote:
okay 2 things where oribitals are 2500 wp's for a squad then the squad leader calls in the orbital strike now it sucks being on the recieving end but you cant take away peoples reward for doing teamwork or having alot of skill or spending alot of time playing the game and having squads of proto gear to stomp on people now having other options besides just orbital strikes like bombing runs or selecting turret or instaltion drop ins would make the game have more options but at the end of the day it will be orbitals cause there reliable and give a ton of kills
now on the the bpp thing guess what there needs to be adv and proto bpos every module weapon suit vehical turret all need bpos that way the people who want to say donate 10 bucks to the game to get a proto large blaster turret bpo can so that cuts the cost of there tank down by almost 1 million isk will it break the game hell no cause look at blood raiders saga look at ishakona watch sage there not breaking the game and there bpo lavs now as a player who has bought every merc pack that s in the game and also has almost all the bpos available i can tell you yes there is a few people that would but there isnt many that will spend the money to buy it when they can just get it for free
and before you wanna add more rage remember raven assault sever logistics suit both require med dropsuit skill lev 3 and here racial verient skil lev 1 in order to use the bpo they purcheased and guess what they never broke the game so having a proto suit dont mean you dont need any sp to wear it you still need the skills your just buying the right to have infenite of them so you can spend your isk on other things
Wait are you saying that having proto-BPO wouldn't be unbalancing? That would be like giving a character 100isk that they can spend over and over again without it going away. If you think proto-stomping is bad now imagine how bad it would be if people weren't worried about loosing their high level gear. It is clear that with no penalty to doing so (cost being the current penalty) even more people would run full proto all the time, making the game even less hospitable to new players.
The Raven and Sever suits are basic level suits, meaning they already have a very low cost (thus a small financial risk associated with them). The same is true with the BPO LAV. These items were a slight advantage to players during the earliest part of Chromosome when all of us had our SP reset to 0 but have not been a factor for a long time. Most of us with the BPO suits don't even run them anymore since they are so much weaker than our other suits. These BPOs are not unbalancing the game because they are not particularly effective and do not confer a large financial bonus to the players using them. This would not be true for BPO proto gear.
Really, before you get on and start ranting think through what you're proposing. Proto-BPOs are about as good on an idea as bottle rockets on a birthday cake. Sure it sounds cool in the abstract, and you know a video of it on youtube is going to be a pisser but the reality is that your going to light the birthday girl's house and dress on fire with your stupid "super candles."
Lets just keep BPO where they are currently, down at the basic level where they have no significant influence on the financial systems CCP is developing for the game. |
Hi-only-me-again
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
63
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 11:41:00 -
[88] - Quote
excillon wrote:
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
I have nearly had 6 in one match of Domination four is common practice for squads running together.
About the rest of it i would say no, even though i would love a proto BPO they would break the game. |
excillon
united we stand x
8
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 08:46:00 -
[89] - Quote
Mobius Kaethis wrote:v4victory wrote:
okay 2 things where oribitals are 2500 wp's for a squad then the squad leader calls in the orbital strike now it sucks being on the recieving end but you cant take away peoples reward for doing teamwork or having alot of skill or spending alot of time playing the game and having squads of proto gear to stomp on people now having other options besides just orbital strikes like bombing runs or selecting turret or instaltion drop ins would make the game have more options but at the end of the day it will be orbitals cause there reliable and give a ton of kills
now on the the bpp thing guess what there needs to be adv and proto bpos every module weapon suit vehical turret all need bpos that way the people who want to say donate 10 bucks to the game to get a proto large blaster turret bpo can so that cuts the cost of there tank down by almost 1 million isk will it break the game hell no cause look at blood raiders saga look at ishakona watch sage there not breaking the game and there bpo lavs now as a player who has bought every merc pack that s in the game and also has almost all the bpos available i can tell you yes there is a few people that would but there isnt many that will spend the money to buy it when they can just get it for free
and before you wanna add more rage remember raven assault sever logistics suit both require med dropsuit skill lev 3 and here racial verient skil lev 1 in order to use the bpo they purcheased and guess what they never broke the game so having a proto suit dont mean you dont need any sp to wear it you still need the skills your just buying the right to have infenite of them so you can spend your isk on other things
Wait are you saying that having proto-BPO wouldn't be unbalancing? That would be like giving a character 100isk that they can spend over and over again without it going away. If you think proto-stomping is bad now imagine how bad it would be if people weren't worried about loosing their high level gear. It is clear that with no penalty to doing so (cost being the current penalty) even more people would run full proto all the time, making the game even less hospitable to new players. The Raven and Sever suits are basic level suits, meaning they already have a very low cost (thus a small financial risk associated with them). The same is true with the BPO LAV. These items were a slight advantage to players during the earliest part of Chromosome when all of us had our SP reset to 0 but have not been a factor for a long time. Most of us with the BPO suits don't even run them anymore since they are so much weaker than our other suits. These BPOs are not unbalancing the game because they are not particularly effective and do not confer a large financial bonus to the players using them. This would not be true for BPO proto gear. Really, before you get on and start ranting think through what you're proposing. Proto-BPOs are about as good on an idea as bottle rockets on a birthday cake. Sure it sounds cool in the abstract, and you know a video of it on youtube is going to be a pisser but the reality is that your going to light the birthday girl's house and dress on fire with your stupid "super candles." Lets just keep BPO where they are currently, down at the basic level where they have no significant influence on the financial systems CCP is developing for the game.
Very good points as well. I'm holding out hope that eventually, and IMHO this would be very cool, that the basic BPO suits could be upgraded or customized, maybe even into a fully custom suit. Kind of like taking a Mustang, and sending it to Roush or Saleen. Like I take a Raven, tweak it to add more slots or somehow up it's stats, change the appearance, etc. That would be awesome, not only because it'd create a huge market for which I'm sure there would be a large demand, but it would be a feature that could really distinguish this game from others of the genre even more so. I mean, if CCP plans on us being able to make our own guns, why not dropsuits? The possibilities could be endless, it would drive up bundle sales for CCP by people who'd be using these at platforms to make their own drop suits, people would obviously buy them for either ISK or Aurum (which if it was Aurum, would boost sales for CCP even more from users buying Aurum packs). The same could be said for LAV's, and anything else in the game.
Man, to dream.... |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
482
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 09:20:00 -
[90] - Quote
I hope your a troll ...if your serious I hope you wrote this when you were drunk and not thinking rationally... if you were sober when you wrote this, then god help you.... |
|
RAGING GIGGLES
Hostile Acquisition Inc The Superpowers
34
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 09:36:00 -
[91] - Quote
I think there should be ADV and PRO BPO's for suits, and only suits, if you have the skills to use the isk equivalents. There should be no difference in stats and it should cost real money. I do not care at all for someone's opinion who doesn't pay for a game, i have no time for whiny, self-entitled, commie freeloaders. If you had an ADV or PRO BPO, you wouldn't be able to outfit it well, unless you had skilled into the weapons, modules, grenades, and equipment. The innate skills too, would be necessary to even come close to the pubstomping closed beta ubernerds. The same principle applies to what is already out in dust, there's already an ADV recruiter BPO suit, and there are aurum suits, weps, modules, nades, and equipment available that takes (literally) less skill, or no skill to use. The rest of ur comments are kinda silly, but i'm looking forward to the armory/trade system if it ever gets here. STD and MLT gear is paper mache, and the BPO's are protostomp fodder, give an equalizer to the weekend warrior |
v4victory
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
24
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 09:37:00 -
[92] - Quote
okay and what happens when eve players send there dust characters isk you can make easy 2 mill in the time it takes to do one ambush on eve just messing around and doing nothing serious now at 200k isk reward means in that ambush you just made 2.2 mill isk and guess what that means at 150k a proto suit you could lose 10 proto suits and not even care
yes eve will be connected with dust and giving players the option to buy a proto bpo will be the same thing as just hoping on eve and just sending free isk over course hey you can buy a plex and sell it in jita for 500+ mill or planetary interaction where you get free isk every day and nothing stoping them from sending it all to your dust character and not have to worry about proto suit for a few months oh but that isnt gonna be buy to win
the idea of giving players the option to buy prototype and advanced gear needs to be in the game as it will be the only thing that can compete with the direction dust will be heading but all i see is people saying its buy to win there is no difference expecially if they give the option to f2p accounts on eve to transfer isk to dust then nothing will be there to stop them from making mass acounts to send isk over will just be a matter of time where you can just buy dust accounts with max isk and skills to go with it
welcome to the future of dust 514 |
excillon
united we stand x
8
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 09:44:00 -
[93] - Quote
v4victory wrote:okay and what happens when eve players send there dust characters isk you can make easy 2 mill in the time it takes to do one ambush on eve just messing around and doing nothing serious now at 200k isk reward means in that ambush you just made 2.2 mill isk and guess what that means at 150k a proto suit you could lose 10 proto suits and not even care
yes eve will be connected with dust and giving players the option to buy a proto bpo will be the same thing as just hoping on eve and just sending free isk over course hey you can buy a plex and sell it in jita for 500+ mill or planetary interaction where you get free isk every day and nothing stoping them from sending it all to your dust character and not have to worry about proto suit for a few months oh but that isnt gonna be buy to win
the idea of giving players the option to buy prototype and advanced gear needs to be in the game as it will be the only thing that can compete with the direction dust will be heading but all i see is people saying its buy to win there is no difference expecially if they give the option to f2p accounts on eve to transfer isk to dust then nothing will be there to stop them from making mass acounts to send isk over will just be a matter of time where you can just buy dust accounts with max isk and skills to go with it
welcome to the future of dust 514
Again, very good points. I haven't even thought of interaction with EVE like that. It does seem shady. Bottom line is CCP has to come up with some sort of system to level the playing field. Between proto suits (which I'm just now learning about in depth), eve interaction, hard core gamers vs. weekend warriors, etc. something is going to have to be done to sort all this out. What, I don't know and could speculate about for weeks. |
v4victory
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
25
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 09:48:00 -
[94] - Quote
also remember when there was players with 100's of millions of isk how many people could just call tank after tank or proto suit after proto suit and not even care
eve players have 100's of billions and wont even care cause they have nothing to spend it on and many players have even more isk
oh and eve players will prob get the ability to make dropsuits modules vehicles so they can just give limitless supply and never even care as it just gives them something new to do |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |