Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Waruiko DUST
G I A N T EoN.
118
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 18:25:00 -
[61] - Quote
Not sure if troll or just stupid... |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
3504
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 18:54:00 -
[62] - Quote
Demon Buddah wrote:Quote: But that's how eve works. Or haven't you heard about the 9000 dollar ship? While EVE does have a lot of BPO it requires more than just owning the BPO to use it like in Dust. In EVE you have to have different minerals and a set of skills to create what the BPO is, in Dust all you have to do is own the BPO.
I'm going to take this quote and emphasize it further by saying that it takes far more than acquiring minerals and skills to produce what the BPO requires.
You will also need access to station services that have available production slots. If you are in high-sec space and don't have your own player-owned structure (POS) that is used for production, then you are stuck waiting in a queue that can take hours or days to even let you get started with production.
There are also standings that you need to grind up via mission running if you want to get a better deal like lowered production fees that the stations charge you every time you use a slot. Those standings take a very long time to grind up as you have to spend hours each day for weeks (if not months) on end trying to build up the proper standings needs to get those good deals.
If you run your own corp and you have enough security standings with Concord, you can then establish your own POS in high-sec that can be used for production and avoid the long queues and hefty fees. But you are responsible for maintaining that POS by refilling it with fuel which costs ISK and fitting it with the proper modules which by themselves also cost ISK. There is also the inherent risk of dealing with opposing corps that declare war against you and your POS every now and then and you have to defend that POS which also costs ISK because of the ships and people you need to defend it.
As you can see, it's not that simple in Eve when it comes to BPOs. Demon is right in that Dust BPOs don't require any of this... for now.
I say "for now" because CCP already has plans to implement an industry of sorts which will involve Eve Online players handling the production side of things while Dust players handle the acquisition of the minerals needed for production. |
TechMechMeds
Swamp Marines
158
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 20:12:00 -
[63] - Quote
Your a Fking idiot. Not only did you agree to the certificate but you can also see stats of items, you ripped yourself off. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
3506
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 22:29:00 -
[64] - Quote
Welcome to New Eden. Where risk-aversed players are not welcomed. The exit is that way. You can leave at any time. Just don't expect sympathy from us when you do leave. You are no different than the whiners who whined about Eve Online having too much risk because they are not able to AFK in their mining barge for hours on end without some outlaw player ganking them in high-sec or unable to avoid the scams that are rampant in the game because they are too lazy to read the details of the contract they accepted before accepting it.
If you don't like risk, too ******* bad. You can go ahead and cry me a river, Justin Timberlake. |
excillon
united we stand x
4
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 00:25:00 -
[65] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Welcome to New Eden. Where risk-aversed players are not welcomed. The exit is that way. You can leave at any time. Just don't expect sympathy from us when you do leave. You are no different than the whiners who whined about Eve Online having too much risk because they are not able to AFK in their mining barge for hours on end without some outlaw player ganking them in high-sec or unable to avoid the scams that are rampant in the game because they are too lazy to read the details of the contract they accepted before accepting it.
If you don't like risk, too ******* bad. You can go ahead and cry me a river, Justin Timberlake.
Well, I'm not leaving. So you'll just have to deal with me, and those like me who have an alternate point of view. I suggest you get used to it. As I said, I'm not the only one.
So I guess we can make a deal, I'll cry you a river but if you want to bring popular songs into it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V06TXd8CwRI
And if you're still not following:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWmmPMuBgjA |
excillon
united we stand x
4
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 00:45:00 -
[66] - Quote
Karl Koekwaus wrote:excillon wrote: 1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
excillon wrote: I don't want to P2W
So you want to be able to pay money and be better than anything, but you don't want P2W? Please explain yourself, it seems you're hopelessly confused right now Keep digging that hole....
I meant comparable. The reason all the ISK people get pissed off about BPO's is because it's not fair that people play who play for free and play a lot using ISK don't think it's fair that someone can walk in, buy BPO's, and be just as good. Yet some people like me who buy gear don't think it's fair that people who sit on here for hours and have the time to do so have the clear advantage over those of us with lives, families, and careers. So what if we buy gear that we don't lose.
Who's digging the hole here? The entire complaint on BPO's is it's not fair to ISK people, yet spending thousands of hours on here isn't fair to the ones who can't. You know what I think? I think the hardcore users are simply afraid that someone can buy a few bundles, and be equal to them. So now who's spoiled and entitled?
If you had bothered to read any of the other posts, you would have seen me already present this argument. I'm GLAD that BPO people threaten the system. It's keeping new players from getting slaughtered. I'm all for it, and I want to see them even more powerful. And I'm willing to bet that as this game goes on, if the Elite bundle is any inclination, it will go that way when CCP realizes how much money it can generate off them. I think most of the other users do, and that's why they are so against BPO's in general. I don't mind P2W systems, because I don't see it that way. I see it as pay to completely customize and have some nice gear that I don't lose. As I said in my OP, that's the way the world works, as cold as it may be. If someone inherits a bunch of money and doesn't have to work, or someone has a good paying job, you should be happy for them. You don't hate someone driving past you in a Ferrari on the same road you're driving your Ford Focus on, and the same principle applies here with what I'm saying. That's life. Maybe you had to work to have that Focus, and the other guy was just given that Ferrari. No one's knocking you for having a Ford, just don't beat up on the guys that have the resources to have better or more of something. It's capitalism, and it's been around for a while. I suggest you read up on it. |
FLAYLOCK Steve
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
73
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 00:55:00 -
[67] - Quote
CLONE117 wrote:mass driver does need a reduction in rof..
it fires to fast for a nade launcher... It's already a slow enough. |
Pugnacious Turtle
Pugnacious Anencephalous
15
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 00:56:00 -
[68] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:To me, and yes I'm going to say it, this sounds like yet another AR user complaining that he can't kill everything all the time with his trusty AR. Well, OP, we're pretty close to the point where you can.
Once the AR users get everything they want I'm out. This game is already on the verge of being Call of Duty in space. I really hope CCP comes to their senses and starts to balance out the AR.
And... to the OP... please don't post to the forums anymore. Your brand of reasoning is toxic. |
Stands Alone
Ultramarine Corp
46
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 00:58:00 -
[69] - Quote
excillon wrote:Skipper Jones wrote:excillon wrote:
To clarify, I'm not a noob, I played this since the Beta launched, and used the ISK items, so I clearly understand both sides of the argument. I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it.
You obviously don't understand both sides if you're saying " I just think there should be better BPO gear, and more of it" BPOs are where they need to be and they don't need anymore. You may say it's not pay2win because there is an isk variant but still. Even though there is an isk variant of everything doesn't eliminate the pay2win argument. IF Mr. Moneybags comes into the game, he should be able to buy prototype, Adv gear (that are unlimited. keep that in mind) with real money. People with money can just buy all the unlimited gear they want. (It also comes at an earlier level). More and better aurum gear will just cross that line of pay2win. It will only hurt the game. But that's how eve works. Or haven't you heard about the 9000 dollar ship? And for the record, I think the prototype gear is kind of BS although I don't know much about it. I'm talking about like the Sever, Raven, Dragonfly, stuff like that.
i am still reading so i dont know if anyone addressed the "thats how eve works" statement... you obviously dont know how EVE works and dont even realize that the $9000 ship was:
1) Guess what? piloted by someone who had to have played or at least had an active account for more than a year... i would say regardless of how he got that ship, he put in over a year to fully fit and fly it, not to mention get the isk to pay for it. 2) payed for with isk, that was made in game, not bought, they were using $9000 as an example. for example; if he would have bought this ship with the going market prices of PLEX then it would have taken $9000.
Maybe you should read the articles that you try to cite.
Maybe you should not throw out a bunch of bull-**** and expect other players of the same game not to notice all the bull-****
|
Karl Koekwaus
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
154
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 01:38:00 -
[70] - Quote
excillon wrote:I meant comparable.
excillon wrote: If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't.
That is not what you say though.
excillon wrote: Yet some people like me who buy gear don't think it's fair that people who sit on here for hours and have the time to do so have the clear advantage over those of us with lives, families, and careers.
Get rid of the wife and kids then if you want to be an internet superhero, just like the winners. It's easier to lose friends than it is to make them.
excillon wrote: Who's digging the hole here? The entire complaint on BPO's is it's not fair to ISK people, yet spending thousands of hours on here isn't fair to the ones who can't. You know what I think? I think the hardcore users are simply afraid that someone can buy a few bundles, and be equal to them. So now who's spoiled and entitled?
Still you, as you make perfectly clear by this post. and every other post you made in this thread.
excillon wrote: If you had bothered to read any of the other posts, you would have seen me already present this argument. I'm GLAD that BPO people threaten the system. It's keeping new players from getting slaughtered. I'm all for it, and I want to see them even more powerful. And I'm willing to bet that as this game goes on, if the Elite bundle is any inclination, it will go that way when CCP realizes how much money it can generate off them. I think most of the other users do, and that's why they are so against BPO's in general. I don't mind P2W systems, because I don't see it that way. I see it as pay to completely customize and have some nice gear that I don't lose. As I said in my OP, that's the way the world works, as cold as it may be. If someone inherits a bunch of money and doesn't have to work, or someone has a good paying job, you should be happy for them. You don't hate someone driving past you in a Ferrari on the same road you're driving your Ford Focus on, and the same principle applies here with what I'm saying. That's life. Maybe you had to work to have that Focus, and the other guy was just given that Ferrari. No one's knocking you for having a Ford, just don't beat up on the guys that have the resources to have better or more of something. It's capitalism, and it's been around for a while. I suggest you read up on it.
So you you say again you want P2W again, after stating you don't want P2W.
BPO's are actually bad for business for CCP since you only have to buy them once. Aur BPC's are much better in the long run since you'll have to keep buying them. But since I don't know how capitalism works, I'm sure you've seen through this already . Games are nice, because they can equalize the playing field by giving everyone the same tools and let skills do the work.
Why are you so upset you can't compete with students and the unemployed? You say the world is harsh and people should be punished for having other priorities and now you want to be able to mitigate having chosen different priorities so you somehow can still be good? Someone with family and a career is too old for reaction wise to play a competitive game in the first place as they generally lack APM.
If we can suggest stuff to each other, I would recommend some lower education for you. Reading/Writing comprehension, a quick guide formulating thoughts, logical thinking and reasoning might in in your best interest to train.
Your reasoning keeps going in haywire. You want P2W items, but you don't want P2W items, you just want to win against people in Proto suits and you can't because you don't have P2W items and people in Proto suits have no jobs but have skill and the world is a hard place because there are no P2W items in Dust?
This might be the most entertaining 'CCP I WANT TO PAY MONEY BECAUSE I DONT KNOW HOW TO PLAY GAMES AND I CANT BE BOTHERED TO LEARN' whine I've ever seen posted on forums. |
|
Pugnacious Turtle
Pugnacious Anencephalous
15
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 01:46:00 -
[71] - Quote
FLAYLOCK Steve wrote:CLONE117 wrote:mass driver does need a reduction in rof..
it fires to fast for a nade launcher... It's already a slow enough.
It needs a nerf.... right along with the assault rifle.
|
Demon Buddah
The Phoenix Federation
50
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 02:30:00 -
[72] - Quote
Quote: And I'm willing to bet that as this game goes on, if the Elite bundle is any inclination, it will go that way when CCP realizes how much money it can generate off them. I think most of the other users do, and that's why they are so against BPO's in general. One reason EVE is one of the most successful MMOs ever is because it isn't pay to win. You could play most MMO's and more than likely it's going to be a pay to win game. It's the same with Dust. If Dust ever came to be that way NO ONE would play it anymore. Even if it's a free game. Why do we have to pay to win in a video game? They have already lost some people because of the fused grenade (before the nerf) was a pay to win item.
Dust and EVE are both unique because of the risk. They give these packs so then they have a way to finance the game. The packs might come with permanent weapons but you don't get a too unfair advantage, not even with the Elite pack.
Who wants to play a game when only the people who have money can win? There are some people who don't have a lot of money, but the parents will buy their kids stuff like a PS3 so they can have fun. And I will say, Dust is probably the best option for video games right now I'm being straight up. You can pay for these packs or Aurum but you don't have to. These updates might screw up the games sometimes, but you don't have to worry about paying for DLC's. You get all this new content for free. That's freaking cool of CCP to do that.
You want to talk about fair? Why should someone with money get special treatment? They might have jobs, and can't keep up with people but it's a game. It's not their life. There are people in my corp who have jobs and can't play a whole lot. But you know what? They sure kick ass when they are on. And they use ISK gear.
This game will get better and more balanced and fixed. And people will look at this game and see it's free AND not pay to win. If Dust ever does become pay to win, myself, and almost ALL Dust players will move on. Because we don't want that. Dust will die if they turn into that. Just as EVE would if it were to become pay to win.
|
Bulldozza Smash
Ultramarine Corp
2
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 05:32:00 -
[73] - Quote
excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
2. I'm sick of Iron sights. Why can't I have an A-cog scope to stick on my Toxin AR? Preferably a BPO module.
3. The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high. I regularly get hit from far off distances with it, and that shouldn't happen. Same with Mass Drivers, I just played a match where either someone had rapid fire, or that firing rate needs to be seriously slowed down. I didn't get killed, but watched 4 of my teammates basically get sniped with one, in very quick succession.
4. Where is the armory and user marketplace we keep hearing is coming? If I want to share my equipment with my corp, I should be able to.
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
6. Guys that sit there and camp in insanely high places. There needs to be map limits not just on boundaries on the ground, but up on buildings as well.
7. More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
8. Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. However, for a game that's supposed to cater to people with multiple opinions (BPO's vs. consumables, etc.) it doesn't seem to.
LMFAO firstly bud if you want the extreme advantage for using real world money go play one of those asian created online micro sale games where you real world money to do any good.
Secondly mate the whole idea of the AUR weapons is to allow to to use weapon with out the required skill dont you listen to the annoying woman when your on the battle barge she is like a bloody infomercial.
As for you crying about orbital strikes, its all depends on how well the squad is doing the more WP the more orbitals there is nothing unfair about it.
Those mass drivers are balanced and there ROF is slow which doesn't need to be changed lol.
The armoury is coming in due time.
Yet the thing that i find really funny is you having a cry about ARs without ACOG scopes... burst and tac have scopes... if you can't kill someone with an AR at range when they have an icon above there head and your AR barely moves when fired add the fact that you have 60 rounds (which is enough to drop a heavy) i want be the first to say it 'damn boy get good or change weapon'
sure there were other crying points i missed but honestly this child should not being posting his bs, you are not entitled to better weapon blueprints through AUR. THIS IS A GAME OF TEAM WORK, TACTICS & SKILL you earn the right to weld the better... so earn it.
Bulldozza Smash CEO Ultramarine Corp
|
E-Rock
Ultramarine Corp
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 06:36:00 -
[74] - Quote
This guy can't be serious. LMFAO |
Mac 3030
Ultramarine Corp
0
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 13:40:00 -
[75] - Quote
This guy just wants to troll around and stomp noobs all day long. |
Jane Madson
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
23
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 00:42:00 -
[76] - Quote
I'm 42, married with 2 kids and work 50 hrs a week. I play this game because its not pay to win. I dont need bto items to be good. Just need a good squad, common sense and a besire to kick ass. I also have spec in to proto heavy, hmg and complex modules. All isk variants. You should really go back to playing kingdoms of camelot or another of those p2w games that spam your facebook account, those are more suited for your skill lvl which must be none. |
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F
1339
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 01:17:00 -
[77] - Quote
in #1 u say if I have money to use in dust i should get better gear and if someone else doesn't its their problem
well if someone has more sp from actually putting time in when u can't it is your problem |
ALPHA DECRIPTER
M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
230
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 01:24:00 -
[78] - Quote
excillon wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Welcome to New Eden. Where risk-aversed players are not welcomed. The exit is that way. You can leave at any time. Just don't expect sympathy from us when you do leave. You are no different than the whiners who whined about Eve Online having too much risk because they are not able to AFK in their mining barge for hours on end without some outlaw player ganking them in high-sec or unable to avoid the scams that are rampant in the game because they are too lazy to read the details of the contract they accepted before accepting it.
If you don't like risk, too ******* bad. You can go ahead and cry me a river, Justin Timberlake. Well, I'm not leaving. So you'll just have to deal with me, and those like me who have an alternate point of view. I suggest you get used to it. As I said, I'm not the only one. So I guess we can make a deal, I'll cry you a river but if you want to bring popular songs into it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V06TXd8CwRIAnd if you're still not following: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWmmPMuBgjA
You're still here? After all the bashing I thought you would be gone by now. Respect. Wanting to help out your corp using BPO's is admirable to say the least. Many corps would be better off to have players with the same mind set as you.
AUR items being better then ISK is not going to happen 'cause it's against CCP's plans for the future but after reading through this thread I can understand how you feel. You don't seem to be in an alliance and ours could use you. We are happy to help the newer players in anyway we can. (Actually spent nearly an hour in merc quarters trying to explain the game to a newb. We also helped him decide which role he was going to take on.)
`Sigh. Just another fun game of DUST . |
Jammer Jalapeno
BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate
51
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 03:06:00 -
[79] - Quote
excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
2. I'm sick of Iron sights. Why can't I have an A-cog scope to stick on my Toxin AR? Preferably a BPO module.
3. The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high. I regularly get hit from far off distances with it, and that shouldn't happen. Same with Mass Drivers, I just played a match where either someone had rapid fire, or that firing rate needs to be seriously slowed down. I didn't get killed, but watched 4 of my teammates basically get sniped with one, in very quick succession.
4. Where is the armory and user marketplace we keep hearing is coming? If I want to share my equipment with my corp, I should be able to.
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
6. Guys that sit there and camp in insanely high places. There needs to be map limits not just on boundaries on the ground, but up on buildings as well.
7. More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
8. Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. However, for a game that's supposed to cater to people with multiple opinions (BPO's vs. consumables, etc.) it doesn't seem to.
Wow dude that is an awful lot of bitching.....perhaps you should play something else LOL
|
excillon
united we stand x
6
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 09:29:00 -
[80] - Quote
To be fair, I'm a numbers guy. English was never my strong point. I should have chosen my words more carefully, as I read my original post, I realize I didn't clarify things enough. I'm not backtracking by any means, I still feel the same. Basically, all I'm asking for is a level playing field. Multiple ways for hardcore and casual users to go at it, without one having a distinct advantage over the other. Maybe I don't have the time to spend playing that others do, that's unfair to me. Maybe it's not fair I simply buy weapons to eliminate risk and give me an advantage. Again, all I ask is level the playing field, in the spirit of fair competition for all.
And for the record, I have a very high level of education. I'm guessing that English isn't your thing either, since my "reasoning going in haywire" makes no sense. I'd point out the lack of punctuation, but I'd sound like my 3rd grade teacher. So lets not throw stones. A level playing field, and people to quit griping about people like me who buy BPO's, and gripe out BPO's in general because they're "ruining the game", when I'm sure a significant handful of them are just upset they can't afford them. |
|
excillon
united we stand x
6
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 09:40:00 -
[81] - Quote
ALPHA DECRIPTER wrote:excillon wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Welcome to New Eden. Where risk-aversed players are not welcomed. The exit is that way. You can leave at any time. Just don't expect sympathy from us when you do leave. You are no different than the whiners who whined about Eve Online having too much risk because they are not able to AFK in their mining barge for hours on end without some outlaw player ganking them in high-sec or unable to avoid the scams that are rampant in the game because they are too lazy to read the details of the contract they accepted before accepting it.
If you don't like risk, too ******* bad. You can go ahead and cry me a river, Justin Timberlake. Well, I'm not leaving. So you'll just have to deal with me, and those like me who have an alternate point of view. I suggest you get used to it. As I said, I'm not the only one. So I guess we can make a deal, I'll cry you a river but if you want to bring popular songs into it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V06TXd8CwRIAnd if you're still not following: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWmmPMuBgjA You're still here? After all the bashing I thought you would be gone by now. Respect. Wanting to help out your corp using BPO's is admirable to say the least. Many corps would be better off to have players with the same mind set as you. AUR items being better then ISK is not going to happen 'cause it's against CCP's plans for the future but after reading through this thread I can understand how you feel. You don't seem to be in an alliance and ours could use you. We are happy to help the newer players in anyway we can. (Actually spent nearly an hour in merc quarters trying to explain the game to a newb. We also helped him decide which role he was going to take on.)
`Sigh. Just another fun game of DUST .
Thanks. I know my opinion isn't a popular one, but I'm stubborn. I stick to my guns. My corp would gladly take the help. We've got about 40 members across 4 different games, and we're slowly bringing them in here. I'm blessed to be in a financial situation where I have the money to help outfit my corp when the armory gets up and running. Part of the original post, actually most of it, is frustration on things seemingly moving so slowly. What drew me to this game was the depth, above games like Battlefield or Killzone. No one likes seeing their members beat up on by guys who are way more powerful, and losing their ISK items on top of it. Hence, why I began my BPO purchasing blitz. I watched one of my Corp guys lose every single one of his Nova knives he's saved for because a guy from subdreddit (who shall remain nameless) decided to camp on top of a building only accessible by dropship and snipe with a Thale at the only spawn point we had left, the MCC. It was a public battle, and we were losing badly already. In my mind, that was just absolutely classless. I don't care if it's winning, they'd won anyway. What that was amounted to nothing more than bullying. Granted, it was only one member of that group (the others I've met seem pretty cool), but still. We're not exactly noobs, as I mentioned I played the Beta along with many others, and there's a guy in our corp who's pretty smart at figuring this stuff out. I appreciate the help offer, and will absolutely take you up on it once the stupid mic bug clears up.
For the record, I already admitted I chose my words badly. I meant comparable, not superior. Like a BPO equivalent of the GEK, etc. |
excillon
united we stand x
6
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 09:51:00 -
[82] - Quote
double post |
Starscream 12
Demon's Forge
4
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 11:53:00 -
[83] - Quote
excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high.
Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that.
OP shotgun range, **** off its **** now it used to be amazing and worth skilling into.
OBs come from team work or carrying the **** out of a match, dont like it get good and get your own OBs.
Less BPOs, only give standard BPOs, **** your money you filthy little ***** its annoying enough people have to work for ISK to pay for proto gear and others fags like you just spend money to keep your suits stocked since youre too **** to stop dying and save ISK.
KB/M user do not have advantage over controller, you will come across those better with KB/M and those better with controller, it all comes down to skill.
Overall you're a whiny little ***** who wants whatever she sees with daddys money, and you have no right to an opinion. |
excillon
united we stand x
7
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:07:00 -
[84] - Quote
Starscream 12 wrote:excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high.
Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. OP shotgun range, **** off its **** now it used to be amazing and worth skilling into. OBs come from team work or carrying the **** out of a match, dont like it get good and get your own OBs. Less BPOs, only give standard BPOs, **** your money you filthy little ***** its annoying enough people have to work for ISK to pay for proto gear and others fags like you just spend money to keep your suits stocked since youre too **** to stop dying and save ISK. KB/M user do not have advantage over controller, you will come across those better with KB/M and those better with controller, it all comes down to skill. Overall you're a whiny little ***** who wants whatever she sees with daddys money, and you have no right to an opinion.
And you sir, are obviously not worth my time. For one, you're obviously a bigot. "Fags"? Really? Welcome to the 21st century, time to come out of the 80's and evolve with the rest of us. Now, I'm not gay, I'm married, but I'm glad you commented on my sexual orientation. I'm sure you're lonely and looking to project your own preferences off on someone else, but I don't swing that way. Not offended if you do though, since you're obviously just dealing with your own closeted self loathing. Hope you work it out, I'm not a therapist so I can't really help you out with that. Sorry.
Now, to address your point, people work in real life for the money to buy that gear, or have it. I have a good job with great pay, and work hard for the money I use to buy bundles. So how is that any different? Because I didn't do it on Dust? Well, I'm sorry, but I simply don't have time to play as much as I'd like because I have to work.
Oh, and by the way: Starscream was a punk and a sissy, who if I remember correctly, was punked by Megatron constantly and got lit up into something crispy by Galvatron. So I find your screen name not only funny, but fitting as well. |
v4victory
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
23
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:34:00 -
[85] - Quote
excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
2. I'm sick of Iron sights. Why can't I have an A-cog scope to stick on my Toxin AR? Preferably a BPO module.
3. The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high. I regularly get hit from far off distances with it, and that shouldn't happen. Same with Mass Drivers, I just played a match where either someone had rapid fire, or that firing rate needs to be seriously slowed down. I didn't get killed, but watched 4 of my teammates basically get sniped with one, in very quick succession.
4. Where is the armory and user marketplace we keep hearing is coming? If I want to share my equipment with my corp, I should be able to.
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
6. Guys that sit there and camp in insanely high places. There needs to be map limits not just on boundaries on the ground, but up on buildings as well.
7. More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
8. Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. However, for a game that's supposed to cater to people with multiple opinions (BPO's vs. consumables, etc.) it doesn't seem to.
okay 2 things where oribitals are 2500 wp's for a squad then the squad leader calls in the orbital strike now it sucks being on the recieving end but you cant take away peoples reward for doing teamwork or having alot of skill or spending alot of time playing the game and having squads of proto gear to stomp on people now having other options besides just orbital strikes like bombing runs or selecting turret or instaltion drop ins would make the game have more options but at the end of the day it will be orbitals cause there reliable and give a ton of kills
now on the the bpp thing guess what there needs to be adv and proto bpos every module weapon suit vehical turret all need bpos that way the people who want to say donate 10 bucks to the game to get a proto large blaster turret bpo can so that cuts the cost of there tank down by almost 1 million isk will it break the game hell no cause look at blood raiders saga look at ishakona watch sage there not breaking the game and there bpo lavs now as a player who has bought every merc pack that s in the game and also has almost all the bpos available i can tell you yes there is a few people that would but there isnt many that will spend the money to buy it when they can just get it for free
and before you wanna add more rage remember raven assault sever logistics suit both require med dropsuit skill lev 3 and here racial verient skil lev 1 in order to use the bpo they purcheased and guess what they never broke the game so having a proto suit dont mean you dont need any sp to wear it you still need the skills your just buying the right to have infenite of them so you can spend your isk on other things
|
excillon
united we stand x
7
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:38:00 -
[86] - Quote
v4victory wrote:excillon wrote:I have a few problems:
1. Packs need better BPO's. Yeah, I know, it's frowned upon by most. But you know what? If people spend their real world money, they deserve an advantage. Any BPO should trump and ISK weapon. I don't care about the whole "risk is the point game". Maybe I like the game, the premise, and don't feel like risking. And so what if I have the money to spend on a nicer gun or suit BPO and someone else doesn't, that's their problem. Sorry, but that's how the world works, some have, and some don't. BPO's aren't wrecking the game, because at least those of us that buy them are actually contributing to the developers. The BPO's shouldn't just be more, but better. FAR better and FAR more. There's no reason why a Kaalotika (or whatever it's called) should be better than a covenant rifle for example.
2. I'm sick of Iron sights. Why can't I have an A-cog scope to stick on my Toxin AR? Preferably a BPO module.
3. The range on the shotgun is ridiculously high. I regularly get hit from far off distances with it, and that shouldn't happen. Same with Mass Drivers, I just played a match where either someone had rapid fire, or that firing rate needs to be seriously slowed down. I didn't get killed, but watched 4 of my teammates basically get sniped with one, in very quick succession.
4. Where is the armory and user marketplace we keep hearing is coming? If I want to share my equipment with my corp, I should be able to.
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
6. Guys that sit there and camp in insanely high places. There needs to be map limits not just on boundaries on the ground, but up on buildings as well.
7. More BPO's. At least one BPO for every class of suits, weapons, modules, vehicle, etc.
8. Separate the PC users, and if possible, move sharpshooter users. Both have an unfair advantage over DS3 users. I'm not saying kick them off the game, but make it so they play each other without interacting with DS3 people.
Overall, I like this game. And it may sound like a lot of griping, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I respect that. However, for a game that's supposed to cater to people with multiple opinions (BPO's vs. consumables, etc.) it doesn't seem to. okay 2 things where oribitals are 2500 wp's for a squad then the squad leader calls in the orbital strike now it sucks being on the recieving end but you cant take away peoples reward for doing teamwork or having alot of skill or spending alot of time playing the game and having squads of proto gear to stomp on people now having other options besides just orbital strikes like bombing runs or selecting turret or instaltion drop ins would make the game have more options but at the end of the day it will be orbitals cause there reliable and give a ton of kills now on the the bpp thing guess what there needs to be adv and proto bpos every module weapon suit vehical turret all need bpos that way the people who want to say donate 10 bucks to the game to get a proto large blaster turret bpo can so that cuts the cost of there tank down by almost 1 million isk will it break the game hell no cause look at blood raiders saga look at ishakona watch sage there not breaking the game and there bpo lavs now as a player who has bought every merc pack that s in the game and also has almost all the bpos available i can tell you yes there is a few people that would but there isnt many that will spend the money to buy it when they can just get it for free and before you wanna add more rage remember raven assault sever logistics suit both require med dropsuit skill lev 3 and here racial verient skil lev 1 in order to use the bpo they purcheased and guess what they never broke the game so having a proto suit dont mean you dont need any sp to wear it you still need the skills your just buying the right to have infenite of them so you can spend your isk on other things
Good points. Thanks man. |
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
441
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 10:48:00 -
[87] - Quote
v4victory wrote:
okay 2 things where oribitals are 2500 wp's for a squad then the squad leader calls in the orbital strike now it sucks being on the recieving end but you cant take away peoples reward for doing teamwork or having alot of skill or spending alot of time playing the game and having squads of proto gear to stomp on people now having other options besides just orbital strikes like bombing runs or selecting turret or instaltion drop ins would make the game have more options but at the end of the day it will be orbitals cause there reliable and give a ton of kills
now on the the bpp thing guess what there needs to be adv and proto bpos every module weapon suit vehical turret all need bpos that way the people who want to say donate 10 bucks to the game to get a proto large blaster turret bpo can so that cuts the cost of there tank down by almost 1 million isk will it break the game hell no cause look at blood raiders saga look at ishakona watch sage there not breaking the game and there bpo lavs now as a player who has bought every merc pack that s in the game and also has almost all the bpos available i can tell you yes there is a few people that would but there isnt many that will spend the money to buy it when they can just get it for free
and before you wanna add more rage remember raven assault sever logistics suit both require med dropsuit skill lev 3 and here racial verient skil lev 1 in order to use the bpo they purcheased and guess what they never broke the game so having a proto suit dont mean you dont need any sp to wear it you still need the skills your just buying the right to have infenite of them so you can spend your isk on other things
Wait are you saying that having proto-BPO wouldn't be unbalancing? That would be like giving a character 100isk that they can spend over and over again without it going away. If you think proto-stomping is bad now imagine how bad it would be if people weren't worried about loosing their high level gear. It is clear that with no penalty to doing so (cost being the current penalty) even more people would run full proto all the time, making the game even less hospitable to new players.
The Raven and Sever suits are basic level suits, meaning they already have a very low cost (thus a small financial risk associated with them). The same is true with the BPO LAV. These items were a slight advantage to players during the earliest part of Chromosome when all of us had our SP reset to 0 but have not been a factor for a long time. Most of us with the BPO suits don't even run them anymore since they are so much weaker than our other suits. These BPOs are not unbalancing the game because they are not particularly effective and do not confer a large financial bonus to the players using them. This would not be true for BPO proto gear.
Really, before you get on and start ranting think through what you're proposing. Proto-BPOs are about as good on an idea as bottle rockets on a birthday cake. Sure it sounds cool in the abstract, and you know a video of it on youtube is going to be a pisser but the reality is that your going to light the birthday girl's house and dress on fire with your stupid "super candles."
Lets just keep BPO where they are currently, down at the basic level where they have no significant influence on the financial systems CCP is developing for the game. |
Hi-only-me-again
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
63
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 11:41:00 -
[88] - Quote
excillon wrote:
5. Orbital strikes. FAR too often. It's obscene. Maybe one per match, ok. When one guy can call 4 of them in one match, that's BS.
I have nearly had 6 in one match of Domination four is common practice for squads running together.
About the rest of it i would say no, even though i would love a proto BPO they would break the game. |
excillon
united we stand x
8
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 08:46:00 -
[89] - Quote
Mobius Kaethis wrote:v4victory wrote:
okay 2 things where oribitals are 2500 wp's for a squad then the squad leader calls in the orbital strike now it sucks being on the recieving end but you cant take away peoples reward for doing teamwork or having alot of skill or spending alot of time playing the game and having squads of proto gear to stomp on people now having other options besides just orbital strikes like bombing runs or selecting turret or instaltion drop ins would make the game have more options but at the end of the day it will be orbitals cause there reliable and give a ton of kills
now on the the bpp thing guess what there needs to be adv and proto bpos every module weapon suit vehical turret all need bpos that way the people who want to say donate 10 bucks to the game to get a proto large blaster turret bpo can so that cuts the cost of there tank down by almost 1 million isk will it break the game hell no cause look at blood raiders saga look at ishakona watch sage there not breaking the game and there bpo lavs now as a player who has bought every merc pack that s in the game and also has almost all the bpos available i can tell you yes there is a few people that would but there isnt many that will spend the money to buy it when they can just get it for free
and before you wanna add more rage remember raven assault sever logistics suit both require med dropsuit skill lev 3 and here racial verient skil lev 1 in order to use the bpo they purcheased and guess what they never broke the game so having a proto suit dont mean you dont need any sp to wear it you still need the skills your just buying the right to have infenite of them so you can spend your isk on other things
Wait are you saying that having proto-BPO wouldn't be unbalancing? That would be like giving a character 100isk that they can spend over and over again without it going away. If you think proto-stomping is bad now imagine how bad it would be if people weren't worried about loosing their high level gear. It is clear that with no penalty to doing so (cost being the current penalty) even more people would run full proto all the time, making the game even less hospitable to new players. The Raven and Sever suits are basic level suits, meaning they already have a very low cost (thus a small financial risk associated with them). The same is true with the BPO LAV. These items were a slight advantage to players during the earliest part of Chromosome when all of us had our SP reset to 0 but have not been a factor for a long time. Most of us with the BPO suits don't even run them anymore since they are so much weaker than our other suits. These BPOs are not unbalancing the game because they are not particularly effective and do not confer a large financial bonus to the players using them. This would not be true for BPO proto gear. Really, before you get on and start ranting think through what you're proposing. Proto-BPOs are about as good on an idea as bottle rockets on a birthday cake. Sure it sounds cool in the abstract, and you know a video of it on youtube is going to be a pisser but the reality is that your going to light the birthday girl's house and dress on fire with your stupid "super candles." Lets just keep BPO where they are currently, down at the basic level where they have no significant influence on the financial systems CCP is developing for the game.
Very good points as well. I'm holding out hope that eventually, and IMHO this would be very cool, that the basic BPO suits could be upgraded or customized, maybe even into a fully custom suit. Kind of like taking a Mustang, and sending it to Roush or Saleen. Like I take a Raven, tweak it to add more slots or somehow up it's stats, change the appearance, etc. That would be awesome, not only because it'd create a huge market for which I'm sure there would be a large demand, but it would be a feature that could really distinguish this game from others of the genre even more so. I mean, if CCP plans on us being able to make our own guns, why not dropsuits? The possibilities could be endless, it would drive up bundle sales for CCP by people who'd be using these at platforms to make their own drop suits, people would obviously buy them for either ISK or Aurum (which if it was Aurum, would boost sales for CCP even more from users buying Aurum packs). The same could be said for LAV's, and anything else in the game.
Man, to dream.... |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
482
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 09:20:00 -
[90] - Quote
I hope your a troll ...if your serious I hope you wrote this when you were drunk and not thinking rationally... if you were sober when you wrote this, then god help you.... |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |