Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
986
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ive gotten to the point where I believe its time that us among landowners and active participants in PC to sit down and make a hard definition of 'indie' as this has several definitions currently and lots of people are abusing the term and using it to ring, hold land, attack so and so, etc etc.
First and foremost:
an 'Indie' corp needs to be just that.. INDEPENDENT.
and corp belonging to an alliance cannot be considered an Indie
Second: ANY corp that calls themselves 'indie' MUST have personnel to wage a battle.
Third: ANY corp that is established and experienced cannot fall under this 'Indie' label example: 187, Pro Hic (were independent before), STB, and many others.
the entire premise of the term 'indie' is for the little guy... the corp that is up and coming, building up their roster and bottom line are at an SP and experience level much lower than the veteran corps.
I now open the floor for discussion. I will edit the OP as we agree on parts of the definition
|
Vethosis
Murder Cakes Of Doom
756
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
1st, and I always thought
indie = corp with no alliance.
or a corp that works alone. |
bigolenuts
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
46
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
under 160 million total SP with the 16 the bring in to a PC |
Soraya Xel
New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men.
178
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
No alliance is a poor requirement.
Reasons:
- Federation of Small Corps, largely belonging to... General Tso's Alliance. Nobody would suggest they don't deserve protection from EoN and such. Being in an alliance does not equate that your alliance can complete with more experienced alliances. - Many corps have an "alliance" just to connect their primary corp with their feeder/academy corp. - Some corps may have a very weak DUST presence, but belong to an EVE alliance.
Realistically, an alliance should be judged just like a corporation is, as there's no such thing as ringing inside your alliance. That means, you determine not whether TeamPlayers is worthy or not worthy of the label's protection, but EoN. EoN is established and experienced. General Tso's is not, (do they even have districts?) and regardless of being in an alliance, probably should get it.
I'm not going to pretend I could figure where my alliance fits on that scale. As some of our corp's have a tough time, and are very small, but we're progressing quickly, and probably don't need protection any more. A month or two ago, we might have. Though if you mention SP level as an important distinction, CUBS, I believe most of our players sit below 10 mil. |
Soraya Xel
New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men.
178
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
Note that, as I think having an alliance or not is a bad requirement, I'd argue the term "indie" just needs to outright die. Tier off corps by their performance. Top Tier, Mid Tier, Low Tier. Done. |
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
763
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
Does it matter?
The terms of anything you guys come up with aren't followed by your alliance members.
I'm not trying to flame there either. Just stating the obvious. |
Vethosis
Murder Cakes Of Doom
757
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:16:00 -
[7] - Quote
If you kick sammus420 out of goonfeet, maybe the attacks from us would stop. |
Soraya Xel
New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men.
178
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
Vethosis wrote:If you kick sammus420 out of goonfeet, maybe the attacks from us would stop.
What's your beef with him anyways? Did he take your stuff?
I can't kick people out of Goonfeet, they're GoonSwarm, we're Gentlemen's Agreement. The Goons do their own thing, they just hang with us sometimes. |
Crusty Fat Bastard
IQQ all day
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:18:00 -
[9] - Quote
Not sure about point 1 what about small alliance that just want to have fun??
Points 2 yes but point 3, at which point do you become established and experienced??
What would you class as experience? Corps with vets classed as experienced? The amount of battles played in PC?? You find find it hard to find a corp that doesn't have a veteran beta player in it and how will you decide the maximum amount of battles needed to then be classed as Experienced?
Corps that are established?? any corp willing, with enough players and ISK, to enter PC are already established.
How about restricting them to X amount of districts? if for example you take more than 3 districts you leave the "indie corp" status and are open to attack from anyone? This to me would make more sence then classifiying them Experienced or Established as there is too much of a grey area with it.
But it could work both ways for example if you have more than X amount of districts and then dont want to be in the battle with bigger corps anymore you could give districts away and be reclassed as an "Indie corp"
You could also do it by player count per corp but that i dont think would work aswell as there are many noob corps with large numbers that can't compete at the higher level but still want to play in PC.
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Does it matter?
The terms of anything you guys come up with aren't followed by your alliance members.
I'm not trying to flame there either. Just stating the obvious.
yes i agree in many ways but these terms are for the community, there should be something about ringers also, somthing like you can only have ringers from other "Indie corps" |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
986
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:27:00 -
[10] - Quote
Crusty Fat Bastard wrote:Not sure about point 1 what about small alliance that just want to have fun?? Points 2 yes but point 3, at which point do you become established and experienced?? What would you class as experience? Corps with vets classed as experienced? The amount of battles played in PC?? You find find it hard to find a corp that doesn't have a veteran beta player in it and how will you decide the maximum amount of battles needed to then be classed as Experienced? Corps that are established?? any corp willing, with enough players and ISK, to enter PC are already established. How about restricting them to X amount of districts? if for example you take more than 3 districts you leave the "indie corp" status and are open to attack from anyone? This to me would make more sence then classifiying them Experienced or Established as there is too much of a grey area with it. But it could work both ways for example if you have more than X amount of districts and then dont want to be in the battle with bigger corps anymore you could give districts away and be reclassed as an "Indie corp" You could also do it by player count per corp but that i dont think would work aswell as there are many noob corps with large numbers that can't compete at the higher level but still want to play in PC. Thor Odinson42 wrote:Does it matter?
The terms of anything you guys come up with aren't followed by your alliance members.
I'm not trying to flame there either. Just stating the obvious. yes i agree in many ways but these terms are for the community, there should be something about ringers also, somthing like you can only have ringers from other "Indie corps"
I do like this idea. Corps lose their 'indie' status once acquiring district # X
I can also get behind Soraya's statement that perhaps being in an 'alliance' isn't necessarily a deciding factor. |
|
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
986
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:29:00 -
[11] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Does it matter?
The terms of anything you guys come up with aren't followed by your alliance members.
I'm not trying to flame there either. Just stating the obvious.
actually I think it does. Lets face it, eon has the corps with the numbers to attack anyone. many of you see that some do this regardless of what is said or planned, hence this attitude.
If we can get a contingent on what this supposed separation of corps we all want in place, then perhaps we can finally sort things and truly separate these 'indie' corps from the rest and lots more good fights will ensue |
Sir Meode
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
798
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:30:00 -
[12] - Quote
Crusty Fat Bastard wrote:Not sure about point 1 what about small alliance that just want to have fun?? Points 2 yes but point 3, at which point do you become established and experienced?? What would you class as experience? Corps with vets classed as experienced? The amount of battles played in PC?? You find find it hard to find a corp that doesn't have a veteran beta player in it and how will you decide the maximum amount of battles needed to then be classed as Experienced? Corps that are established?? any corp willing, with enough players and ISK, to enter PC are already established. How about restricting them to X amount of districts? if for example you take more than 3 districts you leave the "indie corp" status and are open to attack from anyone? This to me would make more sence then classifiying them Experienced or Established as there is too much of a grey area with it.
But it could work both ways for example if you have more than X amount of districts and then dont want to be in the battle with bigger corps anymore you could give districts away and be reclassed as an "Indie corp"You could also do it by player count per corp but that i dont think would work aswell as there are many noob corps with large numbers that can't compete at the higher level but still want to play in PC. Thor Odinson42 wrote:Does it matter?
The terms of anything you guys come up with aren't followed by your alliance members.
I'm not trying to flame there either. Just stating the obvious. yes i agree in many ways but these terms are for the community, there should be something about ringers also, somthing like you can only have ringers from other "Indie corps"
Bold and underlined areas pure genius, i feel these are the areas that the terms should be based around. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
986
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:32:00 -
[13] - Quote
Vethosis wrote:1st, and I always thought
indie = corp with no alliance.
or a corp that works alone.
well by that definition there are literally 2 or 3 corps that could be considered that...
maybe |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
986
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:38:00 -
[14] - Quote
Sir Meode wrote:Crusty Fat Bastard wrote:Not sure about point 1 what about small alliance that just want to have fun?? Points 2 yes but point 3, at which point do you become established and experienced?? What would you class as experience? Corps with vets classed as experienced? The amount of battles played in PC?? You find find it hard to find a corp that doesn't have a veteran beta player in it and how will you decide the maximum amount of battles needed to then be classed as Experienced? Corps that are established?? any corp willing, with enough players and ISK, to enter PC are already established. How about restricting them to X amount of districts? if for example you take more than 3 districts you leave the "indie corp" status and are open to attack from anyone? This to me would make more sence then classifiying them Experienced or Established as there is too much of a grey area with it.
But it could work both ways for example if you have more than X amount of districts and then dont want to be in the battle with bigger corps anymore you could give districts away and be reclassed as an "Indie corp"You could also do it by player count per corp but that i dont think would work aswell as there are many noob corps with large numbers that can't compete at the higher level but still want to play in PC. Thor Odinson42 wrote:Does it matter?
The terms of anything you guys come up with aren't followed by your alliance members.
I'm not trying to flame there either. Just stating the obvious. yes i agree in many ways but these terms are for the community, there should be something about ringers also, somthing like you can only have ringers from other "Indie corps" Bold and underlined areas pure genius, i feel these are the areas that the terms should be based around.
ok well lets work from there then.
Id say 2 would be the cutoff... once u get district #3 you are now a 'big boy'
u lose a district and go back down to 2 that does not change your status.
another idea is utilizing the 'indie' planets still... 28 districts is what about 15% of the map? and I can open another planet (partially open already) for indies.. that was the initial intent of them. anyone gets to district #3 in their possession and they are fair game for all, at which point the district would flip and be placed into the hands of another indie to get in on the fun and the cycle repeats itself.
still at a loss on how to address the entire ringer issue, which is completely out of hand on all sides
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
764
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Does it matter?
The terms of anything you guys come up with aren't followed by your alliance members.
I'm not trying to flame there either. Just stating the obvious. actually I think it does. Lets face it, eon has the corps with the numbers to attack anyone. many of you see that some do this regardless of what is said or planned, hence this attitude. If we can get a contingent on what this supposed separation of corps we all want in place, then perhaps we can finally sort things and truly separate these 'indie' corps from the rest and lots more good fights will ensue
We are largely done with PC.
You guys talk like you are the good guys here. You have the right and the ability to attack anyone you like.
You told us you were attacking because you wanted to fight everyone in our alliance.
You attacked until you took a district. That's fine, because you can.
But that's certainly not what you stated you were doing.
So you lose credibility. And we aren't the only ones. I'm sure all these Indy corps that sent you money for districts love that you can't control the terms of your sale.
Everybody knows that you and Outer Heaven are the top corps out there right now. But what fun is it to wipe everyone out of PC?
Radar gets on here talking like he's a good guy too and they don't stop until they've taken all your districts.
I just don't understand what there is left to prove. If you and your peeps don't allow some breathing room for the rest of Dust then the game is going to shrivel up and die. It could take CCP six months to get some more content in here.
I'm sick and tired of getting my ass kicked by you guys. I'd rather fight guys that are on our level and get better. But we can't.
Hell there are a lot of corps in Eon that aren't getting any better because they aren't able to fend for themselves. At the first sign of weakness they call in the big dogs.
These aren't tears either. Because I'm past giving a **** about PC. But I would like to have some interesting fights from time to time and that doesn't happen 99% of the time in pubs. So WTF is left to do?
I respect what you guys have done. It is/was impressive. But if you guys don't back off you will be the kings of a shitpile. |
Soraya Xel
New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men.
182
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:43:00 -
[16] - Quote
Crusty Fat Bastard wrote:yes i agree in many ways but these terms are for the community, there should be something about ringers also, somthing like you can only have ringers from other "Indie corps"
So much this. Some people seem to be unable to recognize the difference between filling a team with members from another corp you're friends or allies with of similar experience level, and ringing EoN members. |
Azura Sakura
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
391
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:50:00 -
[17] - Quote
Nice reading this topic. I always thought an indie corp were a group of people new to PC battles, have few members and have no affiliation with larger Corps (x_x). |
Knight Soiaire
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
1524
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 14:55:00 -
[18] - Quote
Exemplars, New Eden's Most Wanted, Dios Ex and SeVeN are all part of the same alliance, and owned a whole planet, I think if you're in an alliance that owns that many districts, you immediately lose the 'Indie' tag.
They're only using the Indie tag as protection so they can farm, the only corp that I've seen openly participate in attacks from that Alliance is SeVeN.
C'mon, if you're a part of an Alliance (That has 1289 members, 12 Corps) that not only owns a load of district, but a whole freakin' planet, how can you still classify yourself as an indie? |
Superhero Rawdon
Chaotic-Intent
68
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:01:00 -
[19] - Quote
the little guy, right?
so, we are looking at a alliance-less, smaller-in-numbers, little to no exp in PC corp, right?
'indie' = independant is wut i assumed b4 reading this. but......ok
btw, still wanting to pick your brain for a few minutes, cubs. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
987
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:01:00 -
[20] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Does it matter?
The terms of anything you guys come up with aren't followed by your alliance members.
I'm not trying to flame there either. Just stating the obvious. actually I think it does. Lets face it, eon has the corps with the numbers to attack anyone. many of you see that some do this regardless of what is said or planned, hence this attitude. If we can get a contingent on what this supposed separation of corps we all want in place, then perhaps we can finally sort things and truly separate these 'indie' corps from the rest and lots more good fights will ensue We are largely done with PC. You guys talk like you are the good guys here. You have the right and the ability to attack anyone you like. You told us you were attacking because you wanted to fight everyone in our alliance. You attacked until you took a district. That's fine, because you can. But that's certainly not what you stated you were doing. So you lose credibility. And we aren't the only ones. I'm sure all these Indy corps that sent you money for districts love that you can't control the terms of your sale. Everybody knows that you and Outer Heaven are the top corps out there right now. But what fun is it to wipe everyone out of PC? Radar gets on here talking like he's a good guy too and they don't stop until they've taken all your districts. I just don't understand what there is left to prove. If you and your peeps don't allow some breathing room for the rest of Dust then the game is going to shrivel up and die. It could take CCP six months to get some more content in here. I'm sick and tired of getting my ass kicked by you guys. I'd rather fight guys that are on our level and get better. But we can't. Hell there are a lot of corps in Eon that aren't getting any better because they aren't able to fend for themselves. At the first sign of weakness they call in the big dogs. These aren't tears either. Because I'm past giving a **** about PC. But I would like to have some interesting fights from time to time and that doesn't happen 99% of the time in pubs. So WTF is left to do? I respect what you guys have done. It is/was impressive. But if you guys don't back off you will be the kings of a shitpile.
sorry.. my definition of 'attack' includes taking land. I 'attacked' you once, and took that district. at the time you had 6 others.
u got stomped? sorry, guess im the bad guy cause I have a group of players that wants to fight. I don't care how you see me honestly. I have had 3 PC matches in the last week, all but 1 were defenses. My guys are getting bored and simply want to play. I have kept them out of all this ringing crap for the most part, but at the same time cant stop them from doing things on their own, nor would I.
I DO agree with you tho that just taking out everyone does more harm than good, hence TRYING to have a PRODUCTIVE discussion to help stimulate the PC community and maybe even sorting some things out |
|
Superhero Rawdon
Chaotic-Intent
68
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:02:00 -
[21] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Does it matter?
The terms of anything you guys come up with aren't followed by your alliance members.
I'm not trying to flame there either. Just stating the obvious. actually I think it does. Lets face it, eon has the corps with the numbers to attack anyone. many of you see that some do this regardless of what is said or planned, hence this attitude. If we can get a contingent on what this supposed separation of corps we all want in place, then perhaps we can finally sort things and truly separate these 'indie' corps from the rest and lots more good fights will ensue We are largely done with PC. You guys talk like you are the good guys here. You have the right and the ability to attack anyone you like. You told us you were attacking because you wanted to fight everyone in our alliance. You attacked until you took a district. That's fine, because you can. But that's certainly not what you stated you were doing. So you lose credibility. And we aren't the only ones. I'm sure all these Indy corps that sent you money for districts love that you can't control the terms of your sale. Everybody knows that you and Outer Heaven are the top corps out there right now. But what fun is it to wipe everyone out of PC? Radar gets on here talking like he's a good guy too and they don't stop until they've taken all your districts. I just don't understand what there is left to prove. If you and your peeps don't allow some breathing room for the rest of Dust then the game is going to shrivel up and die. It could take CCP six months to get some more content in here. I'm sick and tired of getting my ass kicked by you guys. I'd rather fight guys that are on our level and get better. But we can't. Hell there are a lot of corps in Eon that aren't getting any better because they aren't able to fend for themselves. At the first sign of weakness they call in the big dogs. These aren't tears either. Because I'm past giving a **** about PC. But I would like to have some interesting fights from time to time and that doesn't happen 99% of the time in pubs. So WTF is left to do? I respect what you guys have done. It is/was impressive. But if you guys don't back off you will be the kings of a shitpile.
u may not like wut this guy is saying, but hes got a point. well said +1
|
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
987
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:03:00 -
[22] - Quote
Superhero Rawdon wrote:the little guy, right? so, we are looking at a alliance-less, smaller-in-numbers, little to no exp in PC corp, right? 'indie' = independant is wut i assumed b4 reading this. but......ok btw, still wanting to pick your brain for a few minutes, cubs.
this was the original definition I used, yes.
what we now see is not necessarily that case, which is why we are discussing it openly to hopefully gain a contingent on it |
Superhero Rawdon
Chaotic-Intent
68
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:09:00 -
[23] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Superhero Rawdon wrote:the little guy, right? so, we are looking at a alliance-less, smaller-in-numbers, little to no exp in PC corp, right? 'indie' = independant is wut i assumed b4 reading this. but......ok btw, still wanting to pick your brain for a few minutes, cubs. this was the original definition I used, yes. what we now see is not necessarily that case, which is why we are discussing it openly to hopefully gain a contingent on it
**** dude. b4 i saw this post, i considered my corp to b a indie corp, as we are alliance-less and on the newb(ish) side of things (only bc we havent gotten into PC YET bc not all my guys are skilled up enough)
i dont understand tho why being active in PC or holding a district would have anything to do with it
the big dogs may have *earned* thier status, or they may not have. but they shouldnt b changing the way a frickin word is used.
but then again.....im just sputtering nonsense. prob not that big of a deal.
i swear to u tho, if u dont grp with me soon, im gonna kidnap your dog. or cat. or wutever. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
987
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:14:00 -
[24] - Quote
send me a mail and ill get u into our public chat. I don't get to play near as much as I used to and when Im on im usually playing nonstop with my peoples ;) |
SoLJae
SVER True Blood
464
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:14:00 -
[25] - Quote
Vethosis wrote:1st, and I always thought
indie = corp with no alliance.
or a corp that works alone.
Good ole fashion logic on display here, folks. To me, the term "indie" is a shortened version of the word "independent" and I agree with Vethosis.
Why bother complicating things any further? No matter how big or small, if a corp goes it alone then they are "indie" imho. |
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
765
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:16:00 -
[26] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Does it matter?
The terms of anything you guys come up with aren't followed by your alliance members.
I'm not trying to flame there either. Just stating the obvious. actually I think it does. Lets face it, eon has the corps with the numbers to attack anyone. many of you see that some do this regardless of what is said or planned, hence this attitude. If we can get a contingent on what this supposed separation of corps we all want in place, then perhaps we can finally sort things and truly separate these 'indie' corps from the rest and lots more good fights will ensue We are largely done with PC. You guys talk like you are the good guys here. You have the right and the ability to attack anyone you like. You told us you were attacking because you wanted to fight everyone in our alliance. You attacked until you took a district. That's fine, because you can. But that's certainly not what you stated you were doing. So you lose credibility. And we aren't the only ones. I'm sure all these Indy corps that sent you money for districts love that you can't control the terms of your sale. Everybody knows that you and Outer Heaven are the top corps out there right now. But what fun is it to wipe everyone out of PC? Radar gets on here talking like he's a good guy too and they don't stop until they've taken all your districts. I just don't understand what there is left to prove. If you and your peeps don't allow some breathing room for the rest of Dust then the game is going to shrivel up and die. It could take CCP six months to get some more content in here. I'm sick and tired of getting my ass kicked by you guys. I'd rather fight guys that are on our level and get better. But we can't. Hell there are a lot of corps in Eon that aren't getting any better because they aren't able to fend for themselves. At the first sign of weakness they call in the big dogs. These aren't tears either. Because I'm past giving a **** about PC. But I would like to have some interesting fights from time to time and that doesn't happen 99% of the time in pubs. So WTF is left to do? I respect what you guys have done. It is/was impressive. But if you guys don't back off you will be the kings of a shitpile. sorry.. my definition of 'attack' includes taking land. I 'attacked' you once, and took that district. at the time you had 6 others. u got stomped? sorry, guess im the bad guy cause I have a group of players that wants to fight. I don't care how you see me honestly. I have had 3 PC matches in the last week, all but 1 were defenses. My guys are getting bored and simply want to play. I have kept them out of all this ringing crap for the most part, but at the same time cant stop them from doing things on their own, nor would I. I DO agree with you tho that just taking out everyone does more harm than good, hence TRYING to have a PRODUCTIVE discussion to help stimulate the PC community and maybe even sorting some things out
And I like it that you are trying to have a discussion. I understand that your guys want to fight.
The system that you have in place is a smart one. Take peoples district then eventually sell it back to them one way or another. Rinse and repeat.
Again I respect and understand it. Kudos for being able to pull it off.
Where does it leave a corp like us? One that's held territory and been able to beat some worthy opponents. If it wasn't for KEQ attacking us everyday the district would have already been taken by Outer Heaven. We are barely hanging on.
The terms of the treaty was supposed to allow us to go to a planet with other LoI corps and rebuild. Which would have been good for you guys long term as we may have been able to provide some decent fights. None of these terms were ever remotely honored. They were over before the ink was dry.
|
Azura Sakura
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
391
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:17:00 -
[27] - Quote
SoLJae wrote:Vethosis wrote:1st, and I always thought
indie = corp with no alliance.
or a corp that works alone. Good ole fashion logic on display here, folks. To me, the term "indie" is a shortened version of the word "independent" and I agree with Vethosis. Why bother complicating things any further? No matter how big or small, if a corp goes it alone then they are "indie" imho. Well. Then we need to put corps into tier(like a previous poster said) then since any high level corp can break off and be an "indie" corp . |
SoLJae
SVER True Blood
465
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:21:00 -
[28] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Note that, as I think having an alliance or not is a bad requirement, I'd argue the term "indie" just needs to outright die. Tier off corps by their performance. Top Tier, Mid Tier, Low Tier. Done.
...Completely agree, the term "indie" is the wrong one to use in this situation to qualify corps correctly. The above tier idea is appropriate or even just using the ranks of veteran and rookie. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
988
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:21:00 -
[29] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Does it matter?
The terms of anything you guys come up with aren't followed by your alliance members.
I'm not trying to flame there either. Just stating the obvious. actually I think it does. Lets face it, eon has the corps with the numbers to attack anyone. many of you see that some do this regardless of what is said or planned, hence this attitude. If we can get a contingent on what this supposed separation of corps we all want in place, then perhaps we can finally sort things and truly separate these 'indie' corps from the rest and lots more good fights will ensue We are largely done with PC. You guys talk like you are the good guys here. You have the right and the ability to attack anyone you like. You told us you were attacking because you wanted to fight everyone in our alliance. You attacked until you took a district. That's fine, because you can. But that's certainly not what you stated you were doing. So you lose credibility. And we aren't the only ones. I'm sure all these Indy corps that sent you money for districts love that you can't control the terms of your sale. Everybody knows that you and Outer Heaven are the top corps out there right now. But what fun is it to wipe everyone out of PC? Radar gets on here talking like he's a good guy too and they don't stop until they've taken all your districts. I just don't understand what there is left to prove. If you and your peeps don't allow some breathing room for the rest of Dust then the game is going to shrivel up and die. It could take CCP six months to get some more content in here. I'm sick and tired of getting my ass kicked by you guys. I'd rather fight guys that are on our level and get better. But we can't. Hell there are a lot of corps in Eon that aren't getting any better because they aren't able to fend for themselves. At the first sign of weakness they call in the big dogs. These aren't tears either. Because I'm past giving a **** about PC. But I would like to have some interesting fights from time to time and that doesn't happen 99% of the time in pubs. So WTF is left to do? I respect what you guys have done. It is/was impressive. But if you guys don't back off you will be the kings of a shitpile. sorry.. my definition of 'attack' includes taking land. I 'attacked' you once, and took that district. at the time you had 6 others. u got stomped? sorry, guess im the bad guy cause I have a group of players that wants to fight. I don't care how you see me honestly. I have had 3 PC matches in the last week, all but 1 were defenses. My guys are getting bored and simply want to play. I have kept them out of all this ringing crap for the most part, but at the same time cant stop them from doing things on their own, nor would I. I DO agree with you tho that just taking out everyone does more harm than good, hence TRYING to have a PRODUCTIVE discussion to help stimulate the PC community and maybe even sorting some things out And I like it that you are trying to have a discussion. I understand that your guys want to fight. The system that you have in place is a smart one. Take peoples district then eventually sell it back to them one way or another. Rinse and repeat. Again I respect and understand it. Kudos for being able to pull it off. Where does it leave a corp like us? One that's held territory and been able to beat some worthy opponents. If it wasn't for KEQ attacking us everyday the district would have already been taken by Outer Heaven. We are barely hanging on. The terms of the treaty was supposed to allow us to go to a planet with other LoI corps and rebuild. Which would have been good for you guys long term as we may have been able to provide some decent fights. None of these terms were ever remotely honored. They were over before the ink was dry.
this is something you need to take up with Mavado.. you know, the leader of Eon.
I don't see why you persist in thinking I have any say in what others do... just not the case.
ok enough of this, lets get this back on topic
in its original definition.. yes.. 'indie' stands for independent, going on their own.
problem is there are few to ZERO of these 'indie' corps that go on their own...
hence the issue at its core |
Soraya Xel
New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men.
184
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 15:42:00 -
[30] - Quote
Knight Soiaire wrote:Exemplars, New Eden's Most Wanted, Dios Ex and SeVeN are all part of the same alliance, and owned a whole planet, I think if you're in an alliance that owns that many districts, you immediately lose the 'Indie' tag.
Two problems with this: First, as mentioned, "indie" is a poor label outright, for reasons this thread has made clear. Second, we bought the entire planet, wholesale, extremely cheaply. (Any tiny indy group can do this, alliance or no alliance.) We did it largely because we figured we'd have some such big power come attack us sooner or later (ended up being sooner), and were hoping having the extraneous districts would draw out the event, so we could get more practice. Unfortunately, we weren't expecting like three major powers to come simultaneously hit us on the same day.
Thankfully, I feel our alliance has risen to the occasion, as we haven't no-showed a single fight, even though we're facing between 5 and 10 fights a day with a very small number of participating players that can actually field proto gear.
Knight Soiaire wrote:They're only using the Indie tag as protection so they can farm, the only corp that I've seen openly participate in attacks from that Alliance is SeVeN.
We were working on coordinating some attacks before a bunch of EoN and Zion ringers as well as the ROFL alliance all attacked us simultaneously. We're sorry we can't handle more than the ten fights per night we've demonstrated we can handle.
Knight Soiaire wrote:C'mon, if you're a part of an Alliance (That has 1289 members, 12 Corps) that not only owns a load of district, but a whole freakin' planet, how can you still classify yourself as an indie?
With probably about 600 of which not playing, at all. (Goons are busy waging war in EVE, and some of our corps don't purge inactives often enough. Game is dying and such.) And a lot of the rest have low SP. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |