Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
342
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 04:16:00 -
[91] - Quote
Jathniel wrote:Eurydice Itzhak wrote:Assault is a crime. Or did Gz scream for help and have a bloody face because he tripped and repeatedly slams his face in the ground and rub grass on his back?
Tm committed no crimes. Gosh darn that's hilarious. A stranger you don't know starts after you, 'not wanting you to get away' with something you haven't even done. I reckon "fight or flight" instincts would kick in for you too. Assault only counts if you're the aggressor, which to public knowledge, Mr. Martin was NOT. Why don't you understand this?
really? he didn't throw the first blow?
last I checked, swinging at someone first for any reason on public property where both of you have a right to be marks you as the aggressor under the law. following someone across public property is not a crime. christ, if that was a crime just about everyone would be guilty at some point or another just by having to go to the same relative places within a town. |
Kazeno Rannaa
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
201
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 04:25:00 -
[92] - Quote
Gigatron Prime wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Got it, unless I take a knee and slit my own throat when someone with differently colored skin than my lily white ass looks at me funny, I'm a racist.
who has a running list of words they aren't allowed to say? Who generates protests, demands for blood, etc when they legally defend themselves? Who gets passed up for jobs when they have the exact same(or even slightly better in some cases) qualifications due to color quotas?
man kills a child? That's sad, but not really newsworthy. White man kills a *insert color here* child? Media circus, protests, demands for blood.
people want to act like race no longer matters, but the reality is that the line has shifted. You're right. Somebody should put them bacK in their place.... Killing is never good but good 'ol fashioned scare tactics might worK.
When you say, "Somebody should put them bacK in their place....
Killing is never good but good 'ol fashioned scare tactics might worK," who is it that you are referring to when you say "them" and that they should be put back in their place through "good 'ol fashioned scare tactics"?
This sound like the kind of Klan talk that I would hear idiots and bigots from the 82nd Airborne at Ft Bragg rant about.
Now I see the real premise of why this thread was started by Gigatron Prime. This is a race based thread, or at least the premise behind it was and seems to continue to be.
This thread and the comments that I am highlighting are a blight to the community that populates New Eden. |
Jathniel
G I A N T EoN.
673
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 04:28:00 -
[93] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Jathniel wrote:Eurydice Itzhak wrote:Assault is a crime. Or did Gz scream for help and have a bloody face because he tripped and repeatedly slams his face in the ground and rub grass on his back?
Tm committed no crimes. Gosh darn that's hilarious. A stranger you don't know starts after you, 'not wanting you to get away' with something you haven't even done. I reckon "fight or flight" instincts would kick in for you too. Assault only counts if you're the aggressor, which to public knowledge, Mr. Martin was NOT. Why don't you understand this? really? he didn't throw the first blow? last I checked, swinging at someone first for any reason on public property where both of you have a right to be marks you as the aggressor under the law. following someone across public property is not a crime. christ, if that was a crime just about everyone would be guilty at some point or another just by having to go to the same relative places within a town.
Well, to be honest, you don't know who threw the first blow.
I seriously doubt, Martin, the unarmed person that was trying to run away did though. That's an opinion. lol oops. He didn't have a car. So much for running being useful anymore. I better turn and fight.
You seem to think that Zimmerman, the person in pursuit, had the intention of chasing him as vigorously as he did because he wanted to have a few words with him. lol oops! "I'm going to chase you down, because I have something I want to say." Okay, shout to him then. Say "Wait!" Say, "Hey, chill! I'm not trying to hurt you!" "Hey! I'm with the neighborhood watch! Where are you headed?" "Don't run! I'm not your enemy!"
SOMETHING to indicate to the person that you're within ear shot of, that you have no intention of hurting them.
Would that be that hard? The person approaching another person is the one that sets the frame for the interaction. |
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
117
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 04:31:00 -
[94] - Quote
Jathniel wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Jathniel wrote:Eurydice Itzhak wrote:Assault is a crime. Or did Gz scream for help and have a bloody face because he tripped and repeatedly slams his face in the ground and rub grass on his back?
Tm committed no crimes. Gosh darn that's hilarious. A stranger you don't know starts after you, 'not wanting you to get away' with something you haven't even done. I reckon "fight or flight" instincts would kick in for you too. Assault only counts if you're the aggressor, which to public knowledge, Mr. Martin was NOT. Why don't you understand this? really? he didn't throw the first blow? last I checked, swinging at someone first for any reason on public property where both of you have a right to be marks you as the aggressor under the law. following someone across public property is not a crime. christ, if that was a crime just about everyone would be guilty at some point or another just by having to go to the same relative places within a town. Well, to be honest, you don't know who threw the first blow. I seriously doubt, Martin, the unarmed person that was trying to run away did though. That's an opinion. lol oops. He didn't have a car. So much for running being useful anymore. I better turn and fight. You seem to think that Zimmerman, the person in pursuit, had the intention of chasing him as vigorously as he did because he wanted to have a few words with him. lol oops! "I'm going to chase you down, because I have something I want to say." Okay, shout to him then. Say "Wait!" Say, "Hey, chill! I'm not trying to hurt you!" "Hey! I'm with the neighborhood watch! Where are you headed?" "Don't run! I'm not your enemy!" SOMETHING to indicate to the person that you're within ear shot of, that you have no intention of hurting them. Would that be that hard? The person approaching another person is the one that sets the frame for the interaction.
Could have said something. Commited no crime by NOT saying something.
Tm had no evidence of ANY physical attack at all.
Seriously man. None of your responses have any facts or evidence. It's all your feelings or your morals.
Crimes are crimes. Not crimes are... Well.... Not.
|
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
343
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 04:32:00 -
[95] - Quote
Jathniel wrote: Would that be that hard? The person approaching another person is the one that sets the frame for the interaction.
and the person beating the **** out of another sets the precedent for legally justified lethal force. Travon could have left as soon as Zimmerman hit the floor. he did not, he straddled and then continued to beat him, even going so far as to bash the back of his head into the concrete several times.
Like it or not, one was going to die. |
Skidd McMarx
DUST University Ivy League
5
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 04:38:00 -
[96] - Quote
Why is this on the forums. |
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
117
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 04:49:00 -
[97] - Quote
Skidd McMarx wrote:Why is this on the forums.
Dead game. Dead forums.
Promises of vehicle buffs in 1.4
Vehicle nerfs far sooner than this. |
Jathniel
G I A N T EoN.
673
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 04:49:00 -
[98] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Got it, unless I take a knee and slit my own throat when someone with differently colored skin than my lily white ass looks at me funny, I'm a racist.
who has a running list of words they aren't allowed to say? Who generates protests, demands for blood, etc when they legally defend themselves? Who gets passed up for jobs when they have the exact same(or even slightly better in some cases) qualifications due to color quotas?
man kills a child? That's sad, but not really newsworthy. White man kills a *insert color here* child? Media circus, protests, demands for blood.
people want to act like race no longer matters, but the reality is that the line has shifted.
That's a lot of pent up anger. Zimmerman was not a white man. He was a minority, just like Martin. So you identifying with him, with those words is telling.
This entire post indicates a lot of anger on your part over dealing with black people period. Look, I'm sorry you may have had some bad interactions with black people before.
The things you mention, don't tip the iceberg for how bad black folk have had it. Who fought to protect a country in the Revolutionary War (and every U.S. war since), that denied them their basic rights as citizens right up until the middle of the 20th century? Who generates protests, demands for blood, etc when someone does not defend themselves on MORAL grounds, LEGAL grounds be damned! It was LEGAL to deny a black man his own livelihood if you considered him "property". Who used that "running list of words" to cause harm and speak negatively BEFORE they weren't allowed to say it? Who still gets passed up for a job and still has the highest unemployment AND incarceration rate, despite the so-called "color quotas"? Who's getting thrown in jail still? Who's killing who?
Race doesn't matter. Race only matters when you're taught that it matters. Even "the line" that you define is non-existent. Zimmerman being acquitted automatically negates that idea. You have a viewpoint of "us vs. them", and you filter everything that happens through that. The only way you'll shake those feelings that you have, is if you start valuing human life as a whole. Had the life of Trayvon Martin carried any weight in your eyes, then your interpretation of the law in this case would have been different. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
343
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 04:49:00 -
[99] - Quote
Jathniel: One last question. since you like doing hypotheticals(it's what your entire posting structure seems to be based off of.) what if zimmerman didn't get his gun and travon did finish beating him to death? is travon a hero? is it somehow better? less of a tragedy? I already know your answer, and that is why we have the law.
Goodnight. |
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
117
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 04:54:00 -
[100] - Quote
ITT: A troll with no facts argues hypotheticals and emotions and refuses to ONCE respond to and refutation of his statements because there is nothing to respond with except " maybe you're right"
Guarantee he replies to this though because it has no facts. Only emotion :) |
|
Gigatron Prime
The.Primes
289
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 04:56:00 -
[101] - Quote
Alright, I'm getting bored now.
Someone pls lock this so I stop getting notifications. |
Jathniel
G I A N T EoN.
674
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 05:23:00 -
[102] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote: the law is the only truly moral barometer. it judges all equally based upon their actions within its rules. the only problem is that the laws are applied by man, and man is fallible. if man were removed from the equation, the law would be infallible.
It is for the same reason the tinkerer of talmacht rejected god and chose death as his child's godparent. it is that death is the only true and just being. he cares not for your wealth, not for your attempts to forstall, not for any thing but his predetermined rounds. If your time had come, he was there to collect, no begging, whimpering, bribery, or status could stay his hand.
whereas god allowed all manner of injustice when he had all the power to stop it. the poor died sick and starving, the rich got fat off the labor of the poor, the devil walked the earth freely.
Weak. I tell you to use your conscience and hold the lives of your fellow man as valuable, and you tell me about myths, the metaphysical, your belief that the law would be infallible without anyone to exercise it over. and that the law is the only true moral barometer?
Laws are based on Principles. Example: Speed Limits, Traffic Lights, Lane Markers, are all implements of traffic law. What is the principle behind traffic law? "To Drive Safely".
Even the god that you criticize had a law for his people. It said don't do this, don't do that, blah blah. Then later on he states that the principle behind is law is to simply: "Love thy God. Thyself, and thy fellow man." Because if you give a pinch of a damn about someone else, you won't kill them, steal from them, etc etc.
I'm not here to teach you about Laws and Principles, but your statement on the law just frightens me as to how many weak-minded people walk this earth.
That is weak man. You got a lot of soul-searching to do. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax. CRONOS.
2628
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 05:26:00 -
[103] - Quote
Jathniel wrote:Eurydice Itzhak wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:Eurydice Itzhak wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:substantive is separate from procedural for a reason. you cannot evaluate the law on an individual basis, picking and choosing how to apply the law to each and every crime, or else we just become a bunch of blood for blood screaming children, demanding the law change with every crime.
The law should be evaluated regularly, but should not on a "oh well I don't like how it worked this time" basis. The law should be evaluated for its capacity to protect those whom live under it's rule. If a law does not provide for the protection of the general public, it should not exist.
As the law stands, GZ is in the right. TM was also in the right until he decided to confront and attack GZ. after that, he was in the wrong. GZ then killed him as he felt his life was threatened(again, rational or irrational fear is irrelevant). GZ never left his legal rights. TM did.
I do not rewrite laws to my favor. I follow the ones that agree with my current path. This man understands. Ok, wait. I assume you've all heard the recording of the phone conversation. So after being told not to follow the kid, he does so anyway, accosts him in a small space with limited room to escape, and Martin doesn't know if this guy is some serial killer or a pedophile or something. I'm to understand that "Stand your Ground" only applies to the guy with the gun? What sense does that make? And would you really just stand there and hope the guy coming at you with a hostile manner doesn't want to hurt you or anything? Your logic is pretty off there. But all of that is beside the point. Why is this even here? We have an Off Topic section for a reason. Aggressive manner is heresay. No evidence supports it. Stand your ground law was not cited in this case. It was self defence laws. Standard ones that apply in nearly every state. No you cannot attack someone who hasnt said anything threatening or attacked you. It's a crime. The person who commited a CRIME died. No other crimes were committed. Trayvon committed no crimes. This was already confirmed by the police officer who took the stand. The only person accused of committing a crime has been acquitted, regardless of him killing someone in an altercation that he provoked. I mean, the ridiculous thing is that what the jury effectively found is that no one was killed. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
345
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 05:44:00 -
[104] - Quote
Jathniel wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote: the law is the only truly moral barometer. it judges all equally based upon their actions within its rules. the only problem is that the laws are applied by man, and man is fallible. if man were removed from the equation, the law would be infallible.
It is for the same reason the tinkerer of talmacht rejected god and chose death as his child's godparent. it is that death is the only true and just being. he cares not for your wealth, not for your attempts to forstall, not for any thing but his predetermined rounds. If your time had come, he was there to collect, no begging, whimpering, bribery, or status could stay his hand.
whereas god allowed all manner of injustice when he had all the power to stop it. the poor died sick and starving, the rich got fat off the labor of the poor, the devil walked the earth freely.
Weak. I tell you to use your conscience and hold the lives of your fellow man as valuable, and you tell me about myths, the metaphysical, your belief that the law would be infallible without anyone to exercise it over. and that the law is the only true moral barometer? Laws are based on Principles. Example: Speed Limits, Traffic Lights, Lane Markers, are all implements of traffic law. What is the principle behind traffic law? "To Drive Safely". Even the god that you criticize had a law for his people. It said don't do this, don't do that, blah blah. Then later on he states that the principle behind is law is to simply: "Love thy God. Thyself, and thy fellow man." Because if you give a pinch of a damn about someone else, you won't kill them, steal from them, etc etc. I'm not here to teach you about Laws and Principles, but your statement on the law just frightens me as to how many weak-minded people walk this earth. That is weak man. You got a lot of soul-searching to do.
I tell you about what shapes my belief in absolutes and you continue to ***** that I have no soul because I place little value in the 7 billion people on this planet.
the god that I criticize had the power to act to enforce principles and did not act. he is less than worthless.
I said that the problem with law is that man is the one to apply it. Not that man should be free from it. in an ideal world, the would be no need of laws, but this is not and never shall be an ideal world.
I know where I keep my soul. I found it and discarded it long ago in the pain of others. you would attempt to speak of my weak mind, so I shall speak on your weak heart.
You, who condemn and damn others for following and applying the rules under which we live, complain that they should not apply just because you saw a picture of someone when they looked cute. Your heart is so weak that you would casually discard all that separates us from mere beasts. You sicken me you bleeding heart, you simpering, weak fool!
People like you are too weak in heart to live in this world. it will warp your values and break you. and I shall be there when you finally snap to the real view of things. I shall be standing there, resolute to offer you a hand so you can cast off your childish need to change the rules because you feel there is something special. No matter the amount of times you bat my hand away I will always be there, ready to welcome you to the real world.
Good night, and may you one day see the light of our cruel binary world.
EDIT: no, the effectively found that lethal force was applied within the law. they ruled out him having to deal with the legal ramifications of killing someone. Totally different items. |
Jathniel
G I A N T EoN.
674
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 05:55:00 -
[105] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:I mean, the ridiculous thing is that what the jury effectively found is that no one was killed.
That pretty much sums it up. Self-defense would protect him from a murder conviction.... but not say an involuntary manslaughter or aggravated manslaughter conviction, because he STILL killed someone, even IF it was by means of a legal act.
Somehow, they essentially said he didn't kill anyone. lol |
Jathniel
G I A N T EoN.
674
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 06:04:00 -
[106] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Jathniel wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote: the law is the only truly moral barometer. it judges all equally based upon their actions within its rules. the only problem is that the laws are applied by man, and man is fallible. if man were removed from the equation, the law would be infallible.
It is for the same reason the tinkerer of talmacht rejected god and chose death as his child's godparent. it is that death is the only true and just being. he cares not for your wealth, not for your attempts to forstall, not for any thing but his predetermined rounds. If your time had come, he was there to collect, no begging, whimpering, bribery, or status could stay his hand.
whereas god allowed all manner of injustice when he had all the power to stop it. the poor died sick and starving, the rich got fat off the labor of the poor, the devil walked the earth freely.
Weak. I tell you to use your conscience and hold the lives of your fellow man as valuable, and you tell me about myths, the metaphysical, your belief that the law would be infallible without anyone to exercise it over. and that the law is the only true moral barometer? Laws are based on Principles. Example: Speed Limits, Traffic Lights, Lane Markers, are all implements of traffic law. What is the principle behind traffic law? "To Drive Safely". Even the god that you criticize had a law for his people. It said don't do this, don't do that, blah blah. Then later on he states that the principle behind is law is to simply: "Love thy God. Thyself, and thy fellow man." Because if you give a pinch of a damn about someone else, you won't kill them, steal from them, etc etc. I'm not here to teach you about Laws and Principles, but your statement on the law just frightens me as to how many weak-minded people walk this earth. That is weak man. You got a lot of soul-searching to do. I tell you about what shapes my belief in absolutes and you continue to ***** that I have no soul because I place little value in the 7 billion people on this planet. the god that I criticize had the power to act to enforce principles and did not act. he is less than worthless. I said that the problem with law is that man is the one to apply it. Not that man should be free from it. in an ideal world, the would be no need of laws, but this is not and never shall be an ideal world. I know where I keep my soul. I found it and discarded it long ago in the pain of others. you would attempt to speak of my weak mind, so I shall speak on your weak heart. You, who condemn and damn others for following and applying the rules under which we live, complain that they should not apply just because you saw a picture of someone when they looked cute. Your heart is so weak that you would casually discard all that separates us from mere beasts. You sicken me you bleeding heart, you simpering, weak fool! People like you are too weak in heart to live in this world. it will warp your values and break you. and I shall be there when you finally snap to the real view of things. I shall be standing there, resolute to offer you a hand so you can cast off your childish need to change the rules because you feel there is something special. No matter the amount of times you bat my hand away I will always be there, ready to welcome you to the real world. Good night, and may you one day see the light of our cruel binary world. EDIT: no, they effectively found that lethal force was applied within the law. they ruled out him having to deal with the legal ramifications of killing someone. Totally different items.
lol dramatic much? Such poetic posts. Are you debating or buttering me up?
Listen. I don't know what history books you read, but those that passively just abided by the law didn't end up changing anything. You always needed a rebel or group of rebels to change things for the better. First, morally and then legally. The law said that minorities, women, the poor, and the young couldn't vote. People felt it in THEIR HEARTS to defy that. The law said that the colonies were supposed to be subservient to the Crown. People felt it in their HEARTS, to defy that too. People with a strong heart, and enough motivation to challenge the status quo, are the ones that make life easier for subservient people like you. lol even Jesus was a rebel.
Good night, dude.
The heart is the seat of motivation my friend, it's the engine. The mind is merely the steering wheel.
|
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
119
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 06:13:00 -
[107] - Quote
Jathniel wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:I mean, the ridiculous thing is that what the jury effectively found is that no one was killed. That pretty much sums it up. Self-defense would protect him from a murder conviction.... but not say an involuntary manslaughter or aggravated manslaughter conviction, because he STILL killed someone, even IF it was by means of a legal act. Somehow, they essentially said he didn't kill anyone. lol
This is what bleeding hearted children actually believe. You know nothing of law. Just stop.
Feel free to respond to any of my 6 other posts refuting all your arguments though. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
346
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 06:17:00 -
[108] - Quote
the mind provides governance to the heart. a direction. without it, you have a bunch of meaningless fluff that screams out every time it sees something it decides is an injustice.
do not mistake my rules and their execution for subservience. I said that I follow the laws that are in line with my current goals nothing more, nothing less.
I am the person who changes the rules from the inside, over time. not some idiot rebel who has to become a martyr to get any change made.
it is because my mind rules my heart that I can abide the laws I do not enjoy, and the slings and arrows of those who bleed freely.
IN THE MIND is the battle truly won. you can force change on someone with your heart, but until their MIND accepts this change it is worthless.
Sorry about the poetic nature of my posting, while it is your ass I'm roasting, now I don't mean to be boasting, but in this debate, you would appear to be a reprobate, please do know that it is that which i hate.
Now let me sleep god-damn-it, you keep setting off my bloody-heart-dar. it's like a radar but it alerts me to people who don't like the world and think that posting on a forum will change anything about it. |
2100 Angels
The Southern Legion RISE of LEGION
194
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 06:33:00 -
[109] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:
Hell yes, posting #108. irony FTW.(according to some Buddhism, there are 108 feelings.)
That's not ironic.
google wrote:i-+ron-+ic /-½-êr+ñnik/ Adjective Using or characterized by irony. Happening in the opposite way to what is expected, thus typically causing wry amusement.
I've chosen to correct you here, because the way in which you frame an argument is idiotic and i disagree with almost everything you've said, and don't have the inclination to encourage your misguided ethical and moral ramblings |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
346
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 06:37:00 -
[110] - Quote
2100 Angels wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:
Hell yes, posting #108. irony FTW.(according to some Buddhism, there are 108 feelings.)
That's not ironic. google wrote:i-+ron-+ic /-½-êr+ñnik/ Adjective Using or characterized by irony. Happening in the opposite way to what is expected, thus typically causing wry amusement. I've chosen to correct you here, because the way in which you frame an argument is idiotic and i disagree with almost everything you've said, and don't have the inclination to encourage your misguided ethical and moral ramblings
I have been posting about ignoring feelings, and religion. I then get a post number that references a religion's view on feelings.
so I have been acting in a manner opposite the reference that was achieved, and I found it ironic, so it was used properly. Then again, you can only see your own view as right, since all of my views on morals and ethics are misguided, right?
whop bob a loo whop a whop bangboom. make sense of that. |
|
KingBlade82
The Phoenix Federation
110
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 06:58:00 -
[111] - Quote
calvin b wrote:These trial along with O.J., Michael Jackson, Lindsey Lohan etc etc are to get the masses attention away from the what is really going on. The stealing of the worlds wealth and the non stop drop to the bottom of the abyss. T.V. is the modern day coliseum. Foot ball and all sports are the gladiators and reality T.V. is the christian vs lion. We are being culled into a slumber as they steal our future and the future generation's wealth and freedom. Refuse to accept what they call truth and seek it for yourself. They are drawing your attention away from the truth.
im pretty sure those cases deal with modern day events and do not hide us from anything the Lindsay case is kinda stupid but this trayvon thing proves people did not watch the case and rallied because Al Sharpton said it was a race crime
and its so funny since Trayvon called George Zimmerman a "cracker" and George had his face beaten up when the cops got there
the case proves how racist people r and how its transferring to blacks instead of whites discriminating |
Jathniel
G I A N T EoN.
679
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 07:05:00 -
[112] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:the mind provides governance to the heart. a direction. without it, you have a bunch of meaningless fluff that screams out every time it sees something it decides is an injustice.
do not mistake my rules and their execution for subservience. I said that I follow the laws that are in line with my current goals nothing more, nothing less.
I am the person who changes the rules from the inside, over time. not some idiot rebel who has to become a martyr to get any change made.
it is because my mind rules my heart that I can abide the laws I do not enjoy, and the slings and arrows of those who bleed freely.
IN THE MIND is the battle truly won. you can force change on someone with your heart, but until their MIND accepts this change it is worthless.
Sorry about the poetic nature of my posting, while it is your ass I'm roasting, now I don't mean to be boasting, but in this debate, you would appear to be a reprobate, please do know that it is that which i hate.
Now let me sleep god-damn-it, you keep setting off my bloody-heart-dar. it's like a radar but it alerts me to people who don't like the world and think that posting on a forum will change anything about it.
Then go the fk to bed, instead of bothering to make rhymes, you crazy *******.
Eurydice Itzhak wrote:This is what bleeding hearted children actually believe. You know nothing of law. Just stop.
Feel free to respond to any of my 6 other posts refuting all your arguments though.
You take pride in not having a "bleeding heart" huh? Someone made you cry when you were little and you decided to be a hard ass by being an icy cold sentinel of law? Look up what the purpose of the law actually is. Read some history. Look at some cases. Learn what a legal precedent is, then come back and read everything you posted. When you feel dumb about it, you'll see why I didn't respond to you.
|
Takkun Cat
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 07:14:00 -
[113] - Quote
Gigatron Prime wrote:GO!
*****************************
Alright, I'm getting bored now.
Someone pls lock this so I stop getting notifications.
The irony isn't lost Gigatron. Neither was your Klan reference. Either you're a troll w no clue or tact, or just.... well we'll leave that alone.
All I do know is that without this, (possibly the worst thread I've seen on here, but I shouldn't be surprised in the least) we wouldn't have been able to see Heathen Bastard's melodramatic and creepy musings!!! I mean seriously, the last handful of posts i swear i smelled incense and could see candles burning in the background....
Hmm.. I think I see a made-for-TV movie in the works.... yeah definitely starring an aging Steven Segal.
Too bad everyone posts with pseudonyms...... maybe i'll start a tumblr just for DUST........
http://publicshaming.tumblr.com/post/55892945838/president-obama-makes-thoughtful-statement-on-trayvon |
HYENAKILLER X
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
64
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 07:36:00 -
[114] - Quote
calvin b wrote:These trial along with O.J., Michael Jackson, Lindsey Lohan etc etc are to get the masses attention away from the what is really going on. The stealing of the worlds wealth and the non stop drop to the bottom of the abyss. T.V. is the modern day coliseum. Foot ball and all sports are the gladiators and reality T.V. is the christian vs lion. We are being culled into a slumber as they steal our future and the future generation's wealth and freedom. Refuse to accept what they call truth and seek it for yourself. They are drawing your attention away from the truth. A grown man racially profiled a 17 year old boy, while armed with a pistol, looking for trouble, approached and harrased a MINOR who was innocent and harming no one untill the adult offended the innocent boy, got his ass beat for it then murdered him.
Verizon lets the government listen to your calls, we let the airport security touch our balls, cameras and cops everywhere harrassing and getti ng away with it.
One boy stood against it alone and was murdered but some how is the distraction.
Your comment is a fine example of shallow and narrow vision mixed with desensitization.
The universe lobs a gimme to the revolution and the revolution whiffs hard. |
Allah's Snackbar
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
426
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 07:46:00 -
[115] - Quote
HYENAKILLER X wrote:calvin b wrote:These trial along with O.J., Michael Jackson, Lindsey Lohan etc etc are to get the masses attention away from the what is really going on. The stealing of the worlds wealth and the non stop drop to the bottom of the abyss. T.V. is the modern day coliseum. Foot ball and all sports are the gladiators and reality T.V. is the christian vs lion. We are being culled into a slumber as they steal our future and the future generation's wealth and freedom. Refuse to accept what they call truth and seek it for yourself. They are drawing your attention away from the truth. A grown man racially profiled a 17 year old boy, while armed with a pistol, looking for trouble, approached and harrased a MINOR who was innocent and harming no one untill the adult offended the innocent boy, got his ass beat for it then murdered him. Verizon lets the government listen to your calls, we let the airport security touch our balls, cameras and cops everywhere harrassing and getti ng away with it. One boy stood against it alone and was murdered but some how is the distraction. Your comment is a fine example of shallow and narrow vision mixed with desensitization. The universe lobs a gimme to the revolution and the revolution whiffs hard. God bless America?
Regardless of your view - the Jury spoke. I would beleve it should be time to pour your energies into fixing the things that caused this as you know you can't convince each other of anything you simply take this easier path of vitriol. |
Gigatron Prime
The.Primes
289
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 07:46:00 -
[116] - Quote
How the hell is this still open??
I thought it would have surely been shutdown pages ago...
I tried so hard too... |
calvin b
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
77
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 08:08:00 -
[117] - Quote
Nemo Bluntz wrote:calvin b wrote:These trial along with O.J., Michael Jackson, Lindsey Lohan etc etc are to get the masses attention away from the what is really going on. The stealing of the worlds wealth and the non stop drop to the bottom of the abyss. T.V. is the modern day coliseum. Foot ball and all sports are the gladiators and reality T.V. is the christian vs lion. We are being culled into a slumber as they steal our future and the future generation's wealth and freedom. Refuse to accept what they call truth and seek it for yourself. They are drawing your attention away from the truth. Do tin foil hats come in medium?
My point exactly, you must have forgot the 99 dot com bust, the 2008 housing crash and the next one will be the bond's. Don't believe me look at Detroit the future of most major cities if we do not fix the mess were in. As we fix upon hollywierd and all its decadence we are left hollow like our bank accounts. Also were is the middle class, oh ya there is no one left because they were taxed and spent there way into oblivion. |
Eris Ernaga
Super Nerds
347
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 08:11:00 -
[118] - Quote
These threads are the exact reason I hate the forums and the idiots who inhabit them. |
Eurydice Itzhak
Militaires Sans Jeux
119
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 08:12:00 -
[119] - Quote
Jathniel wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:the mind provides governance to the heart. a direction. without it, you have a bunch of meaningless fluff that screams out every time it sees something it decides is an injustice.
do not mistake my rules and their execution for subservience. I said that I follow the laws that are in line with my current goals nothing more, nothing less.
I am the person who changes the rules from the inside, over time. not some idiot rebel who has to become a martyr to get any change made.
it is because my mind rules my heart that I can abide the laws I do not enjoy, and the slings and arrows of those who bleed freely.
IN THE MIND is the battle truly won. you can force change on someone with your heart, but until their MIND accepts this change it is worthless.
Sorry about the poetic nature of my posting, while it is your ass I'm roasting, now I don't mean to be boasting, but in this debate, you would appear to be a reprobate, please do know that it is that which i hate.
Now let me sleep god-damn-it, you keep setting off my bloody-heart-dar. it's like a radar but it alerts me to people who don't like the world and think that posting on a forum will change anything about it. Then go the fk to bed, instead of bothering to make rhymes, you crazy *******. Eurydice Itzhak wrote:This is what bleeding hearted children actually believe. You know nothing of law. Just stop.
Feel free to respond to any of my 6 other posts refuting all your arguments though. You take pride in not having a "bleeding heart" huh? Someone made you cry when you were little and you decided to be a hard ass by being an icy cold sentinel of law? Look up what the purpose of the law actually is. Read some history. Look at some cases. Learn what a legal precedent is, then come back and read everything you posted. When you feel dumb about it, you'll see why I didn't respond to you.
Far from a hard ass just not completely blinded by emotion. You wanted to talk about the facts of the case until you were proven to not have watched the trial.
Then it becomes about changing the law and making a difference.
You wanted to talk about being kinder to your fellow man yet it is you who keeps resorting to insults.
The law has been abided by the surviving participate of the incident. It was not abides by the deceased.
If you want to get self defence laws changed that's good for you, but this isn't your platform or thread or medium to get it accomplished. |
ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
313
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 08:27:00 -
[120] - Quote
Eris Ernaga wrote:These threads are the exact reason I hate the forums and the idiots who inhabit them.
G'day fellow idiot! =D |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |