Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cordera Ray
Galactic Warrior Corporation
17
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
This is a Team Death Match, there should be no vehicle or tank or dropship what so ever in that game mode. It cater too ppl that cant do a simple thing or cant use ur gun to kill ppl,or run around in the map finding ppl and killing them, but they relied on the vehicle to get high kill without a death, boost there k/d up and try to get a good score (really). Ever time u try to either destroyed it with anti rocket here the option 1.he will drive away once he aware that he being target by a Anti Rocket, 2. he will drive up close to u he will jump out and shoot u.3.depend what suit he is using most of time it will be either a heavy suit or proto shot gunner, 4 Simple thing Run ur **** over.
LAV need to be Remove all they do is call them up and get in them drive around and run ur **** over. I know it happen too a lot of u so don't try to denied that It never happen to u before.
The Tank, If the enemy team get 2 or 3 tank in the game, the game is over regardless of the outcome on how u play and finish it. Unless there was a miracle that happen that ur team was smart enough to get the rocker out and start firing away but there a catch to that, u know how everytime u lock on to the tank and once u fire the first shot that tank will just either run away and get to cover or if he player has some balls he will just blast u away or his team will cover firing him. Which is so damn lame. Tank need to be Remove from Ambush.
Why would a Dropship be in a team death match game unless they provide Air support. Team Death Match game is a straight up Gun on Gun match , hover the sky putting sniper on very disadvantage places so the can shoot us at vulnerable spot and every time u try to blast them away they will either fly high or hide behind building. Seriously they need to be remove from ambush.
Now if u remove these three from the Ambush Completely, Ambush will be a better game mode and it will be alot smoother. A Straight up Team vs Team, Gun vs Gun ur done. I know a lot of ppl hate getting run over by LAV or getting slaughter by a Tank or Getting blasted by Above with a Drop ship.
So let the hate begin.
|
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1681
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
tl;dr no. |
Shadowswipe
WarRavens League of Infamy
133
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
What if that is how the enemy ambushed you in the first place? I say give one side 10 LAVs from the start... that is where they first spawn into, a moving LAV. |
SENATOR KODOS
Absentee AFK Regiment
222
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
|
oso tiburon
The Generals EoN.
56
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
that has to be the biggest QQ ever i mean wow |
SENATOR KODOS
Absentee AFK Regiment
222
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
oso tiburon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
that has to be the biggest QQ ever i mean wow
I like when people us QQ wrong lolderp. |
Xender17
Intrepidus XI Omega Commission
204
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
oso tiburon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
that has to be the biggest QQ ever i mean wow Agreed |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION
2176
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:36:00 -
[8] - Quote
Someone complaining about dropships? OMG, the impossible has occurred. |
oso tiburon
The Generals EoN.
56
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:36:00 -
[9] - Quote
SENATOR KODOS wrote:oso tiburon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
that has to be the biggest QQ ever i mean wow I like when people us QQ wrong lolderp. ok let me rephrase that ... the stupidest thing i have ever heard ... remove all vehicles so we can then have call of duty size maps with call of duty type gameplay ... hey lets all just run around ar's and smgs no skirmish no domo just team death match thats soooo original .... gtfo go back to black ops scrub or spec into swarms like every one else god im so sick of the stupidity |
Xender17
Intrepidus XI Omega Commission
204
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:39:00 -
[10] - Quote
Dust focuses more on ISK balance than KDR. Vehicle users feel that pain... Sure they may survive 2 rounds without a death. But the time always comes were they lose 800,000-1,000,000 isk and have to go through at least 4 rounds to get it back. |
|
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1596
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:39:00 -
[11] - Quote
To be honest there should be a game mode without vehicles. But removing vehicles from ambush is not a option. I love sitting on top of a hill and using my proto swarms to blow up all the dumb LAV's, derpships and here and then a wild tank. Strangely ive got once called a dirty camper for just blowing LAV's up. That guy didnt liked it to loose logi LAV's. |
Cosgar
ParagonX
2222
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:47:00 -
[12] - Quote
What do you want next, an AR assault only mode too? Use the triple SP and spec into an AV weapon that isn't a grenade if vehicles offend you so much. |
Aythadis Smith
The Generals EoN.
39
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:50:00 -
[13] - Quote
Maybe a no vehicle mode or open the map some more so you can at least hide from them better |
Thor McStrut
Reckoners
46
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:51:00 -
[14] - Quote
I don't know the answer to the LAV problem, but I don't think they should be removed. Neither HAVs. At 6M SP though, I don't feel like I have a strong enough grasp on my basic fit, so I'm not dumping SP into AV yet. I just with others would help me deal with them though. Flux/MD combo is hard, I usually have to wait for them to get stuck on a rock, then flux em and MD the **** out of them. I just wish I could dodge out of the way better. |
SENATOR KODOS
Absentee AFK Regiment
222
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:52:00 -
[15] - Quote
oso tiburon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:oso tiburon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
that has to be the biggest QQ ever i mean wow I like when people us QQ wrong lolderp. ok let me rephrase that ... the stupidest thing i have ever heard ... remove all vehicles so we can then have call of duty size maps with call of duty type gameplay ... hey lets all just run around ar's and smgs no skirmish no domo just team death match thats soooo original .... gtfo go back to black ops scrub or spec into swarms like every one else god im so sick of the stupidity
Once again you make no sense. Im not saying remove them because they are good. Im saying remove them because they are useless lol derp more derp. |
hooc roht
Deep Space Republic Top Men.
208
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:55:00 -
[16] - Quote
no bad idea.
It would be cool for some maps that make vehicles nearly impossible to use. |
Poplo Furuya
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
202
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 21:59:00 -
[17] - Quote
SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
I agree partially with your second statement. Where we differ is I think the solution's to make a game in which they're more relevant. Rather than excising them they should be better integrated into the game, gain a larger role and a closer symbiotic relationship with infantry.
The problem isn't vehicles, it's that Ambush and Skirmish 2.0 are ill considered and under designed. Do they naturally foster a broader team dynamic and bring a tactical objective-oriented focus into the game? No, they do not. |
SENATOR KODOS
Absentee AFK Regiment
222
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:00:00 -
[18] - Quote
Poplo Furuya wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
I agree partially with your second statement. Where we differ is I think the solution's to make a game in which they're more relevant, rather than excising vehicles they should have more of a role and a closer symbiotic relationship with infantry. The problem isn't vehicles, it's that Ambush and Skirmish 2.0 are ill considered and under designed. Do they naturally foster a broader team dynamic and bring a tactical objective-oriented focus into the game? No, they do not.
Completely agree. At least you dont have nerd rage goggles on. At this point they are useless. If they could make them not useless I would say keep them but they wont. |
oso tiburon
The Generals EoN.
61
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:01:00 -
[19] - Quote
Thor McStrut wrote:I don't know the answer to the LAV problem, but I don't think they should be removed. Neither HAVs. At 6M SP though, I don't feel like I have a strong enough grasp on my basic fit, so I'm not dumping SP into AV yet. I just with others would help me deal with them though. Flux/MD combo is hard, I usually have to wait for them to get stuck on a rock, then flux em and MD the **** out of them. I just wish I could dodge out of the way better. NERF THE FN SHIELDS NUKE THEM DOWN TO NEXT TO NOTHING . i call bs when i can get 3 direct hits from a proto compressed rail gun and the little yellow sumabiyatch laughs at me and runs away |
Aythadis Smith
The Generals EoN.
39
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:02:00 -
[20] - Quote
SENATOR KODOS wrote:oso tiburon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:oso tiburon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
that has to be the biggest QQ ever i mean wow I like when people us QQ wrong lolderp. ok let me rephrase that ... the stupidest thing i have ever heard ... remove all vehicles so we can then have call of duty size maps with call of duty type gameplay ... hey lets all just run around ar's and smgs no skirmish no domo just team death match thats soooo original .... gtfo go back to black ops scrub or spec into swarms like every one else god im so sick of the stupidity Once again you make no sense. Im not saying remove them because they are good. Im saying remove them because they are useless lol derp more derp. Problem is that if one goes AV, there isn't a supply depo to switch back. In turn, free kill for anti infantry.
As a vehicle specced idiot, I can grasp the pain of being stuck with out said vehicle and being stuck out in the open with just AV.
I bet the problem isn't tanks. Till recently when tanks look like giant ISK sinks, when ever I seem a red tank, I was calling mine it to deal with said threat. So I am willing to bet it isnt tanks that are the problem but these damn joy ride LAVs with limbs caught in the brush guard. |
|
oso tiburon
The Generals EoN.
61
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:03:00 -
[21] - Quote
SENATOR KODOS wrote:oso tiburon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:oso tiburon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
that has to be the biggest QQ ever i mean wow I like when people us QQ wrong lolderp. ok let me rephrase that ... the stupidest thing i have ever heard ... remove all vehicles so we can then have call of duty size maps with call of duty type gameplay ... hey lets all just run around ar's and smgs no skirmish no domo just team death match thats soooo original .... gtfo go back to black ops scrub or spec into swarms like every one else god im so sick of the stupidity Once again you make no sense. Im not saying remove them because they are good. Im saying remove them because they are useless lol derp more derp. once again they do serve a purpose derp herp they serve as armored transport across large open areas they serve as infantry support they serve as a distraction for other enemy infantry they serve as area denile ... shall i go on .. like i said cod ghosts is out go give that a spin this game is far beyond your grasp
|
Aythadis Smith
The Generals EoN.
39
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:04:00 -
[22] - Quote
Bumble bee LAVs need to be a squad car. If area of effect was brought back, slow these girls down, and add a minimum speed to kill with a direct hit would keep these girls on line. Oh and war points for repping. Give them incentive to be a ambulance. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
525
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:13:00 -
[23] - Quote
No.
Vehicles serve an area of denial purpose against anyone without the AV to counter them. Giving players a way to opt out of vehicle warfare via a seperate game mode leaves Pilots just with other Pilots and AV infantry.
Vehicle drivers focus their SP on vehicles and are likely to be less proficient in all other areas due to this. They would be pretty much excluded from playing ambush on a high level without their vehicles.
|
Poplo Furuya
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
203
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:15:00 -
[24] - Quote
oso tiburon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:oso tiburon wrote:ok let me rephrase that ... the stupidest thing i have ever heard ... remove all vehicles so we can then have call of duty size maps with call of duty type gameplay ... hey lets all just run around ar's and smgs no skirmish no domo just team death match thats soooo original .... gtfo go back to black ops scrub or spec into swarms like every one else god im so sick of the stupidity Once again you make no sense. Im not saying remove them because they are good. Im saying remove them because they are useless lol derp more derp. once again they do serve a purpose derp herp they serve as armored transport across large open areas they serve as infantry support they serve as a distraction for other enemy infantry they serve as area denile ... shall i go on .. like i said cod ghosts is out go give that a spin this game is far beyond your grasp I think his phrasing was just unfortunate and you got off on the wrong tack.
What he actually meant was probably just that Dust, as it is, clearly is not a game that has been designed around the presence of vehicles and the potential dynamics they bring. Their being there is incidental to the present game, they aren't fundamental to it.
This is a problem and one which I for one don't think CCP have properly understood or perhaps even acknowledged. |
calvin b
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
2
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:18:00 -
[25] - Quote
Vehicles should stay, but there should be limits on were they can go. LAV should not be able to drive up two flights of stairs and run you over for this is ridiculous. Limit the number of tanks on the board, more than three its getting out of hand. Dropships no problem here fly all you want |
SENATOR KODOS
Absentee AFK Regiment
224
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:18:00 -
[26] - Quote
oso tiburon wrote:once again they do serve a purpose derp herp they serve as armored transport across large open areas they serve as infantry support they serve as a distraction for other enemy infantry they serve as area denile ... shall i go on .. like i said cod ghosts is out go give that a spin this game is far beyond your grasp
Another fail vehicle user with an active imagination lol.
|
SENATOR KODOS
Absentee AFK Regiment
224
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:19:00 -
[27] - Quote
Poplo Furuya wrote:oso tiburon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:oso tiburon wrote:ok let me rephrase that ... the stupidest thing i have ever heard ... remove all vehicles so we can then have call of duty size maps with call of duty type gameplay ... hey lets all just run around ar's and smgs no skirmish no domo just team death match thats soooo original .... gtfo go back to black ops scrub or spec into swarms like every one else god im so sick of the stupidity Once again you make no sense. Im not saying remove them because they are good. Im saying remove them because they are useless lol derp more derp. once again they do serve a purpose derp herp they serve as armored transport across large open areas they serve as infantry support they serve as a distraction for other enemy infantry they serve as area denile ... shall i go on .. like i said cod ghosts is out go give that a spin this game is far beyond your grasp I think his phrasing was just unfortunate and you got off on the wrong tack. What he actually meant was probably just that Dust, as it is, clearly is not a game that has been designed around the presence of vehicles and the potential dynamics they bring. Their being there is incidental to the present game, they aren't fundamental to it. This is a problem and one which I for one don't think CCP have properly understood or perhaps even acknowledged.
Ya dudes wearing the proto version of the nerd rage goggles.
|
KingBlade82
The Phoenix Federation
59
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:22:00 -
[28] - Quote
ive said this before they need to have a no vehicle game mode or make ambush no vehicle for the casual members who want to just kill people and not wrry about objectives or lavs running them over and over again |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1910
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:26:00 -
[29] - Quote
HTFU and run AV |
Manly Vehicle Operator
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:29:00 -
[30] - Quote
While we're at it lets remove infantry from Skirmish. And the neocom from the merc quarters. |
|
Poplo Furuya
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
204
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:30:00 -
[31] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:HTFU and run AV I don't normally play Ambush but on the odd occasion I've been shanghai'd into it there's been a wonderful plethora of vehicles who clearly weren't expecting proper AV. I do love me a target rich environment. |
Noc Tempre
Internal Error. League of Infamy
2073
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:33:00 -
[32] - Quote
SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
I actually agree with this for the current state of the game. |
Galvan Nized
Deep Space Republic Top Men.
59
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:36:00 -
[33] - Quote
hooc roht wrote:no bad idea.
It would be cool if we had some maps that make vehicles nearly impossible to use.
Finally someone gets it, give us maps that favor infantry over vehicles and vice versa. More urban maps and less bowls full of nothing but junk crates.
Not the vehicles that are bad it's poor implementation. |
KingBlade82
The Phoenix Federation
59
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 22:47:00 -
[34] - Quote
but even battlefield (a vehicle game more so than others) has a just player match so u need no worries I said this in beta and I say it now we do need one or need to change ambush either way I always play dom or skirmish but when I join an ambush map it seems to me like way more dropships, tanks, and lavs and no skill just crap matches |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
554
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 23:00:00 -
[35] - Quote
I've been asking for a vehicle-free ambush mode for quite some time now.
Vehicle-free ambush + squadless option = An extremely fun and balanced experience that would definitely draw a bigger crowd to this game. It would also be the perfect way to go unwind after PC, skirmish or exhaustive squad play. Just listen to some tunes via in-game music and let the stress melt away since you don't have to worry about vehicles, team-stacking pubstompers or AFKers. Every match would be consistent and even (for the most part). This, IMO, would be Dust paradise.
Squadless option has a very slight chance of making the pick and getting implemented sometime in the next 2 years, however I really doubt they would ever opt for a vehicle-free ambush mode. CCP is vehicle bias due to EVE after all.
Such a shame too, as that would make this game almost infinitely more enjoyable for players who just want to pew pew other infantry players without having to sacrifice themselves or their fits just to take out a few pesky LAV's or tanks. It's especially offensive in regular ambush, in which the only way to get AV is to die or start the match with it (thus being gimped in infantry fights). |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1799
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 23:06:00 -
[36] - Quote
I love when the enemy team brings in vehicles in Ambush. If your squad isn't full of retards you can easily trash enemy vehicles... and even when you fail, it's easily one of the more exciting things to do in an Ambush. Just last night my little ragtag squad took out about 15 tanks/dropships over the course of 3 matches.
if you're dying to vehicles, have the squad pull out AV, take care of the vehicles, and the get back to your regularly scheduled program. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1799
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 23:13:00 -
[37] - Quote
KingBlade82 wrote:but even battlefield (a vehicle game more so than others) has a just player match so u need no worries I said this in beta and I say it now we do need one or need to change ambush either way I always play dom or skirmish but when I join an ambush map it seems to me like way more dropships, tanks, and lavs and no skill just crap matches
vehicles require as much or more skill to use properly as dropsuits do.
What sort of AV do your squads usually have available to them? |
KingBlade82
The Phoenix Federation
59
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 23:25:00 -
[38] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:but even battlefield (a vehicle game more so than others) has a just player match so u need no worries I said this in beta and I say it now we do need one or need to change ambush either way I always play dom or skirmish but when I join an ambush map it seems to me like way more dropships, tanks, and lavs and no skill just crap matches vehicles require as much or more skill to use properly as dropsuits do. What sort of AV do your squads usually have available to them?
none since my corp never plays :P |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1800
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 23:36:00 -
[39] - Quote
KingBlade82 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:but even battlefield (a vehicle game more so than others) has a just player match so u need no worries I said this in beta and I say it now we do need one or need to change ambush either way I always play dom or skirmish but when I join an ambush map it seems to me like way more dropships, tanks, and lavs and no skill just crap matches vehicles require as much or more skill to use properly as dropsuits do. What sort of AV do your squads usually have available to them? none since my corp never plays :P
Then your issue should be with your corp, not with vehicle users.
AV is very powerful against vehicles, if your squads simply flip to AV and WORK TOGETHER you can easily take down even the strongest of tanks.
Sure, if there's an uber strong tank, and they are being supported by Infantry units... you may not be able to get to the tank. In that case, you're simply up against a good team that has their **** together. Instead of arguing that the good teams shouldn't have so many tools at their disposal, maybe you should focus on improving the team you are on so you can match those who are beating you. |
KingBlade82
The Phoenix Federation
59
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 00:03:00 -
[40] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:but even battlefield (a vehicle game more so than others) has a just player match so u need no worries I said this in beta and I say it now we do need one or need to change ambush either way I always play dom or skirmish but when I join an ambush map it seems to me like way more dropships, tanks, and lavs and no skill just crap matches vehicles require as much or more skill to use properly as dropsuits do. What sort of AV do your squads usually have available to them? none since my corp never plays :P Then your issue should be with your corp, not with vehicle users. AV is very powerful against vehicles, if your squads simply flip to AV and WORK TOGETHER you can easily take down even the strongest of tanks. Sure, if there's an uber strong tank, and they are being supported by Infantry units... you may not be able to get to the tank. In that case, you're simply up against a good team that has their **** together. Instead of arguing that the good teams shouldn't have so many tools at their disposal, maybe you should focus on improving the team you are on so you can match those who are beating you.
Its not PC I shouldn't need a team to win any random should do well tbh ur starting the argument I didn't I said we need a mode for casual players |
|
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1801
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 00:14:00 -
[41] - Quote
KingBlade82 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:but even battlefield (a vehicle game more so than others) has a just player match so u need no worries I said this in beta and I say it now we do need one or need to change ambush either way I always play dom or skirmish but when I join an ambush map it seems to me like way more dropships, tanks, and lavs and no skill just crap matches vehicles require as much or more skill to use properly as dropsuits do. What sort of AV do your squads usually have available to them? none since my corp never plays :P Then your issue should be with your corp, not with vehicle users. AV is very powerful against vehicles, if your squads simply flip to AV and WORK TOGETHER you can easily take down even the strongest of tanks. Sure, if there's an uber strong tank, and they are being supported by Infantry units... you may not be able to get to the tank. In that case, you're simply up against a good team that has their **** together. Instead of arguing that the good teams shouldn't have so many tools at their disposal, maybe you should focus on improving the team you are on so you can match those who are beating you. Its not PC I shouldn't need a team to win any random should do well tbh ur starting the argument I didn't I said we need a mode for casual players
My whole corp is full of casual players. I just fundamentally disagree with your assessment. The game is already extremely casual. We don't need to start taking away options. If you start limiting the stuff people can use, the lazy will just flock to the modes with fewer options, and those who happen to prefer the options you have arbitrarily chosen to limit are left with fewer choices than those who have chosen to spec into the things in which you personally prefer. It also means in the long run there will be less diversity in the user base, because it would be easier to just skill into an AR assault suit and call it a day. Then all of those players have themselves trapped in their own little kiddie pool with no real knowledge of how to actually swim.
There's no rhyme or reason as to why you would simply say "these thinks can't be used, because casuals." What makes you think there aren't plenty of casual who play in tanks, dropships, LAVs, and AV? I know many of the more casual players in my own corp enjoy all of those options. |
Judge Rhadamanthus
Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS.
209
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 00:25:00 -
[42] - Quote
gbghg wrote:Someone complaining about dropships? OMG, the impossible has occurred.
I know... I thought he must have misspelled dropSUIT or something. |
Michael Arck
sephiroth clones General Tso's Alliance
84
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 00:36:00 -
[43] - Quote
I was playing this morning when I got off from work. Here I am working the reds with my heavy alt, just chipping away life when a gray screen and that infamous death drone noise came in. I was like wtf?! I didn't hear the MT coming, but I did hear it reverse. I was pissed but I just HTFU.
One hand I would like to say yes, we don't need vehicles in Ambush. But then my other side, my competitive "throw some dirt on it" mentality" says kitten that. Just learn how to fight against it. I would be upset that they fulfill the wish on principle. It means I wasn't able to adapt and overcome so I had them remove an obstacle for my own sake.
I think if there's a concentrated effort on teams, things would change. If teammates would respond to the presence of the MT and give it priority, then you wouldn't have the problem as frequently. Don't you agree? I see the MT come but everybody ignores it. It should be priority to destroy that first because MTs are nothing more than rats that scrounge on the leftovers. You can't focus on killing the red when you got a MT trying his hardest to run you over.
Or at least, as somebody mention before on here, have the damaged lowered at certain instances. If he just accelerated and I'm right there, I should take considerable damage but it shouldn't be enough to kill me. I am in a dropsuit that has heavy armor. You would think that the dropsuit in that situation would cause more harm to the MT than the MT would to the player. |
Mobias Wyvern
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 00:57:00 -
[44] - Quote
Be your own Judge. What game looks like more fun to you? Dust.........Or this.........
Planetside 2
Coming to PS4 this year
|
KingBlade82
The Phoenix Federation
59
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 03:09:00 -
[45] - Quote
Well when I say no vehicle mode I ment u can use heavys and stuff just pure fps im not saying AR's for everyone |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1808
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 03:26:00 -
[46] - Quote
KingBlade82 wrote:Well when I say no vehicle mode I ment u can use heavys and stuff just pure fps im not saying AR's for everyone
The point is that you're simply picking things you personally don't like and then saying "there should be a mode without these things." The same argument could be made for any item in the game. |
KingBlade82
The Phoenix Federation
59
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 03:37:00 -
[47] - Quote
no? its in other games as well im not saying no mass drivers even though I hate them lol im saying we should have a mode for just fps |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1808
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 05:59:00 -
[48] - Quote
KingBlade82 wrote:no? its in other games as well im not saying no mass drivers even though I hate them lol im saying we should have a mode for just fps
Nah, let's have a mode for vehicles-only instead. No puny infantry nerds with their silly little pea shooters. |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 06:29:00 -
[49] - Quote
Cordera Ray wrote:This is a Team Death Match, there should be no vehicle or tank or dropship what so ever in that game mode. It cater too ppl that cant do a simple thing or cant use ur gun to kill ppl,or run around in the map finding ppl and killing them, but they relied on the vehicle to get high kill without a death, boost there k/d up and try to get a good score (really). Ever time u try to either destroyed it with anti rocket here the option 1.he will drive away once he aware that he being target by a Anti Rocket, 2. he will drive up close to u he will jump out and shoot u.3.depend what suit he is using most of time it will be either a heavy suit or proto shot gunner, 4 Simple thing Run ur **** over.
LAV need to be Remove all they do is call them up and get in them drive around and run ur **** over. I know it happen too a lot of u so don't try to denied that It never happen to u before.
The Tank, If the enemy team get 2 or 3 tank in the game, the game is over regardless of the outcome on how u play and finish it. Unless there was a miracle that happen that ur team was smart enough to get the rocker out and start firing away but there a catch to that, u know how everytime u lock on to the tank and once u fire the first shot that tank will just either run away and get to cover or if he player has some balls he will just blast u away or his team will cover firing him. Which is so damn lame. Tank need to be Remove from Ambush.
Why would a Dropship be in a team death match game unless they provide Air support. Team Death Match game is a straight up Gun on Gun match , hover the sky putting sniper on very disadvantage places so the can shoot us at vulnerable spot and every time u try to blast them away they will either fly high or hide behind building. Seriously they need to be remove from ambush.
Now if u remove these three from the Ambush Completely, Ambush will be a better game mode and it will be alot smoother. A Straight up Team vs Team, Gun vs Gun ur done. I know a lot of ppl hate getting run over by LAV or getting slaughter by a Tank or Getting blasted by Above with a Drop ship.
So let the hate begin.
wow and we should all give up our guns while we're at it sorry but I feel the pain that vehicle users have. just fix murder taxis and it will be fixed
and it says ambush not team deathmatch so if one group of soldiers are ambushed and they can get support then more power to them
that is unless your team actually gets AV out or a squad gets out your own vehicles.
we should all hug each other and the game should be mining 514 and we should do the mining for Eve players
Quit QQing |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 06:31:00 -
[50] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:Baal Roo wrote: vehicles require as much or more skill to use properly as dropsuits do.
What sort of AV do your squads usually have available to them?
none since my corp never plays :P Then your issue should be with your corp, not with vehicle users. AV is very powerful against vehicles, if your squads simply flip to AV and WORK TOGETHER you can easily take down even the strongest of tanks. Sure, if there's an uber strong tank, and they are being supported by Infantry units... you may not be able to get to the tank. In that case, you're simply up against a good team that has their **** together. Instead of arguing that the good teams shouldn't have so many tools at their disposal, maybe you should focus on improving the team you are on so you can match those who are beating you. Its not PC I shouldn't need a team to win any random should do well tbh ur starting the argument I didn't I said we need a mode for casual players My whole corp is full of casual players. I just fundamentally disagree with your assessment. The game is already extremely casual. We don't need to start taking away options. If you start limiting the stuff people can use, the lazy will just flock to the modes with fewer options, and those who happen to prefer the options you have arbitrarily chosen to limit are left with fewer choices than those who have chosen to spec into the things in which you personally prefer. It also means in the long run there will be less diversity in the user base, because it would be easier to just skill into an AR assault suit and call it a day. Then all of those players have themselves trapped in their own little kiddie pool with no real knowledge of how to actually swim. There's no rhyme or reason as to why you would simply say "these things can't be used, because casuals." What makes you think there aren't plenty of casual who play in tanks, dropships, LAVs, and AV? I know many of the more casual players in my own corp enjoy all of those options. I mean, why not make a mode with no uplinks? Or a mode with no mass drivers? How about a mode with no sidearms? All of these things would certainly make the game easier for "casuals" (ie: people who prefer AR Assault suits), but the question isn't really "why not" it is " why?" Good job Test Alliance showing the power of casual players both here and in Eve |
|
CharCharOdell
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
250
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 07:09:00 -
[51] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:What do you want next, an AR assault only mode too? Use the triple SP and spec into an AV weapon that isn't a grenade if vehicles offend you so much.
You could get proto swarms in a few hours this week. try them out. no vehicle will ever bother you again once they see that in the kill feed. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1810
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 07:11:00 -
[52] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Baal Roo wrote: My whole corp is full of casual players. I just fundamentally disagree with your assessment. The game is already extremely casual. We don't need to start taking away options. If you start limiting the stuff people can use, the lazy will just flock to the modes with fewer options, and those who happen to prefer the options you have arbitrarily chosen to limit are left with fewer choices than those who have chosen to spec into the things in which you personally prefer. It also means in the long run there will be less diversity in the user base, because it would be easier to just skill into an AR assault suit and call it a day. Then all of those players have themselves trapped in their own little kiddie pool with no real knowledge of how to actually swim.
There's no rhyme or reason as to why you would simply say "these things can't be used, because casuals." What makes you think there aren't plenty of casual who play in tanks, dropships, LAVs, and AV? I know many of the more casual players in my own corp enjoy all of those options.
I mean, why not make a mode with no uplinks? Or a mode with no mass drivers? How about a mode with no sidearms?
All of these things would certainly make the game easier for "casuals" (ie: people who prefer AR Assault suits), but the question isn't really "why not" it is "why?"
Good job Test Alliance showing the power of casual players both here and in Eve
fry.jpg
not sure if compliment
or insult |
Cosgar
ParagonX
2225
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 07:14:00 -
[53] - Quote
Aythadis Smith wrote:Bumble bee LAVs need to be a squad car. If area of effect was brought back, slow these girls down, and add a minimum speed to kill with a direct hit would keep these girls on line. Oh and war points for repping. Give them incentive to be a ambulance. Proximity mines should at least flip a LAV over if they don't get destroyed. |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 07:16:00 -
[54] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Killar-12 wrote:Baal Roo wrote: My whole corp is full of casual players. I just fundamentally disagree with your assessment. The game is already extremely casual. We don't need to start taking away options. If you start limiting the stuff people can use, the lazy will just flock to the modes with fewer options, and those who happen to prefer the options you have arbitrarily chosen to limit are left with fewer choices than those who have chosen to spec into the things in which you personally prefer. It also means in the long run there will be less diversity in the user base, because it would be easier to just skill into an AR assault suit and call it a day. Then all of those players have themselves trapped in their own little kiddie pool with no real knowledge of how to actually swim.
There's no rhyme or reason as to why you would simply say "these things can't be used, because casuals." What makes you think there aren't plenty of casual who play in tanks, dropships, LAVs, and AV? I know many of the more casual players in my own corp enjoy all of those options.
I mean, why not make a mode with no uplinks? Or a mode with no mass drivers? How about a mode with no sidearms?
All of these things would certainly make the game easier for "casuals" (ie: people who prefer AR Assault suits), but the question isn't really "why not" it is "why?"
Good job Test Alliance showing the power of casual players both here and in Eve fry.jpg not sure if if compliment or insult Complement... Eve side that is for having the most poeple not just 30 alts per person like another huge alliance that resides in Deklein Most of you guys are good but there is one member who is particularly annoying |
KingBlade82
The Phoenix Federation
59
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 07:30:00 -
[55] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:no? its in other games as well im not saying no mass drivers even though I hate them lol im saying we should have a mode for just fps Nah, let's have a mode for vehicles-only instead. No puny infantry nerds with their silly little pea shooters.
and u have the freedom to make that suggestion as I have to make mine CCP will do whatever they see fit |
Justin Tymes
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
179
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 07:31:00 -
[56] - Quote
Someone said it before, the main problem with Vehicles in Ambush is the fact that you're stuck with it, meaning you're ineffective against Infantry with a brain, while vehicle users have no problem hurting anything in Ambush so they don't need a Supply Depot. What this means is that as soon as you bring AV into Ambush, you're auto-nerfed compared to the team with the vehicles. This is a balance problem that needs to be fixed. |
CharCharOdell
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
252
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 07:42:00 -
[57] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:Someone said it before, the main problem with Vehicles in Ambush is the fact that you're stuck with it, meaning you're ineffective against Infantry with a brain, while vehicle users have no problem hurting anything in Ambush so they don't need a Supply Depot. What this means is that as soon as you bring AV into Ambush, you're auto-nerfed compared to the team with the vehicles. This is a balance problem that needs to be fixed. \get your own vehicles, then. no one is stopping you. |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
14
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 07:44:00 -
[58] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:Someone said it before, the main problem with Vehicles in Ambush is the fact that you're stuck with it, meaning you're ineffective against Infantry with a brain, while vehicle users have no problem hurting anything in Ambush so they don't need a Supply Depot. What this means is that as soon as you bring AV into Ambush, you're auto-nerfed compared to the team with the vehicles. This is a balance problem that needs to be fixed. Well you don't expect the blueberries to actually think in combat do you? Also you don't expect to solo a tank? |
Cordera Ray
Galactic Warrior Corporation
20
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 14:01:00 -
[59] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Cordera Ray wrote:This is a Team Death Match, there should be no vehicle or tank or dropship what so ever in that game mode. It cater too ppl that cant do a simple thing or cant use ur gun to kill ppl,or run around in the map finding ppl and killing them, but they relied on the vehicle to get high kill without a death, boost there k/d up and try to get a good score (really). Ever time u try to either destroyed it with anti rocket here the option 1.he will drive away once he aware that he being target by a Anti Rocket, 2. he will drive up close to u he will jump out and shoot u.3.depend what suit he is using most of time it will be either a heavy suit or proto shot gunner, 4 Simple thing Run ur **** over.
LAV need to be Remove all they do is call them up and get in them drive around and run ur **** over. I know it happen too a lot of u so don't try to denied that It never happen to u before.
The Tank, If the enemy team get 2 or 3 tank in the game, the game is over regardless of the outcome on how u play and finish it. Unless there was a miracle that happen that ur team was smart enough to get the rocker out and start firing away but there a catch to that, u know how everytime u lock on to the tank and once u fire the first shot that tank will just either run away and get to cover or if he player has some balls he will just blast u away or his team will cover firing him. Which is so damn lame. Tank need to be Remove from Ambush.
Why would a Dropship be in a team death match game unless they provide Air support. Team Death Match game is a straight up Gun on Gun match , hover the sky putting sniper on very disadvantage places so the can shoot us at vulnerable spot and every time u try to blast them away they will either fly high or hide behind building. Seriously they need to be remove from ambush.
Now if u remove these three from the Ambush Completely, Ambush will be a better game mode and it will be alot smoother. A Straight up Team vs Team, Gun vs Gun ur done. I know a lot of ppl hate getting run over by LAV or getting slaughter by a Tank or Getting blasted by Above with a Drop ship.
So let the hate begin.
wow and we should all give up our guns while we're at it sorry but I feel the pain that vehicle users have. just fix murder taxis and it will be fixed and it says ambush not team deathmatch so if one group of soldiers are ambushed and they can get support then more power to them that is unless your team actually gets AV out or a squad gets out your own vehicles. we should all hug each other and the game should be mining 514 and we should do the mining for Eve players Quit QQing
U must be tripping where in that sentence did I say that Ambush is not a team deathmatch. Im saying that Vehicle and Tank and Dropship should not be in a Team Death Match game. Look man PPL are not going to quit a game because they think that oh they get kill with something that note surpose to be in the game with is Team Death Match. Now ur saying that We should give up our guns ok why should we give up our gun? What about ur Gun Experience then that what lacking when ppl relied on the tool that get them easy kill and easy scoring and flawless game. Without those I bet u they wont go flawless. Oh yea it does Depend on ur team on how they handle it it not about if ur team actually get AV and just take out there enemy squad because most of time enemy will blow them up the same way we try do.Vehicle need to be on skirmish period or take them out of Ambush. |
Soldiersaint
Reaper Galactic
12
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 14:02:00 -
[60] - Quote
SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
wrong go back to cod! |
|
EKH0 0ne
Knights of No Republic
156
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 14:12:00 -
[61] - Quote
SENATOR KODOS wrote:oso tiburon wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
that has to be the biggest QQ ever i mean wow I like when people us QQ wrong lolderp.
I like when people QQ then come up with a pathetice comeback |
Cordera Ray
Galactic Warrior Corporation
20
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 14:21:00 -
[62] - Quote
Soldiersaint wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
wrong go back to cod!
no u need to go back to cod cod suck **** im im not complaining about game Vehicle don't need to be in a Team Death Match game period if u don't like don't reply is that simple. |
Poplo Furuya
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
208
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 14:38:00 -
[63] - Quote
Cordera Ray wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
wrong go back to cod! no u need to go back to cod cod suck **** im im not complaining about game Vehicle don't need to be in a Team Death Match game period if u don't like don't reply is that simple. My proposal is that we lock up all the sinister left-handed people. If you don't like my proposal then simply don't reply. |
Cordera Ray
Galactic Warrior Corporation
20
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 14:50:00 -
[64] - Quote
Poplo Furuya wrote:Cordera Ray wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
wrong go back to cod! no u need to go back to cod cod suck **** im im not complaining about game Vehicle don't need to be in a Team Death Match game period if u don't like don't reply is that simple. My proposal is that we lock up all the sinister left-handed people. If you don't like my proposal then simply don't reply.
Ur proposal it like ur telling the ppl that who complained about vehicle on a team death match game. Now name FPS that doesn't call Car to run over ppl or call in a tank going on rampage that allow it on a Team Death Match.
P.S. Don't put BF or PS2 in this pay attention what I said What FPS that doesn't Allow Vehicle in a Team Death Match. |
The Attorney General
ZionTCD
211
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 14:52:00 -
[65] - Quote
I don't agree with taking vehicles out of ambush.
However, I will agree that tankers who consistently play ambush are bad or stat padding.
|
CharCharOdell
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
253
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:39:00 -
[66] - Quote
Cordera Ray wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
wrong go back to cod! no u need to go back to cod cod suck **** im im not complaining about game Vehicle don't need to be in a Team Death Match game period if u don't like don't reply is that simple.
you're what is ruining dust. you are the reason we had the OP TAR with Cal Logi. Go away. Nobody likes you.
The fact that you call it Team Death Match makes me know you're a whiny CoDboi. Nobody likes codbois. Adapt or die like the rest of us. |
SENATOR KODOS
Absentee AFK Regiment
231
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:41:00 -
[67] - Quote
Ahh the old CoD nerd response. Stay nerdy Dusters.
|
KingBlade82
The Phoenix Federation
60
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:47:00 -
[68] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:Cordera Ray wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
wrong go back to cod! no u need to go back to cod cod suck **** im im not complaining about game Vehicle don't need to be in a Team Death Match game period if u don't like don't reply is that simple. you're what is ruining dust. you are the reason we had the OP TAR with Cal Logi. Go away. Nobody likes you. The fact that you call it Team Death Match makes me know you're a whiny CoDboi. Nobody likes codbois. Adapt or die like the rest of us.
Team Deathmatch is in all shooters? idk where u people come from but you are ignorant of the world of gaming
that being said idk if they didn't add the game mode yet or think ambush is good enough |
Darken-Sol
BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate
403
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 21:54:00 -
[69] - Quote
Poplo Furuya wrote:Cordera Ray wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
wrong go back to cod! no u need to go back to cod cod suck **** im im not complaining about game Vehicle don't need to be in a Team Death Match game period if u don't like don't reply is that simple. My proposal is that we lock up all the sinister left-handed people. If you don't like my proposal then simply don't reply. did you do that intentionally? |
Shavan D
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:12:00 -
[70] - Quote
I'm a dropship pilot and ambush is the only way I can get kills with out worrying about turrets but even I have to admit that vehicles in ambush is irritating. |
|
Cordera Ray
Galactic Warrior Corporation
20
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:41:00 -
[71] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:Cordera Ray wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:SENATOR KODOS wrote:Vehicles shouldnt even be in this game period. They serve no purpose.
wrong go back to cod! no u need to go back to cod cod suck **** im im not complaining about game Vehicle don't need to be in a Team Death Match game period if u don't like don't reply is that simple. you're what is ruining dust. you are the reason we had the OP TAR with Cal Logi. Go away. Nobody likes you. The fact that you call it Team Death Match makes me know you're a whiny CoDboi. Nobody likes codbois. Adapt or die like the rest of us.
First of all I never Complain about TAC AR being Nerf in stuff and Second someone was telling me to go to cod and I told him what I said now don't try to point the finger thou because u cant just blame one person for ruin a TAC AR which all of the Veteran player have. Now I didn't get to use the TAC AR at it true form so there, now ppl did have the rite thou to complain about them and I wasn't one of those ppl that did. |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
15
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:45:00 -
[72] - Quote
People use vehicles in combat for an advantage becausethey can take punisment , so just use teamwork or lots of tanks. |
TEBOW BAGGINS
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
651
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:46:00 -
[73] - Quote
as if using a gun in a video game is something special.. a kill is a kill. if you wanna feel skilled at something take up a real hobby/sport/craft other than video gaming |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
2142
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:50:00 -
[74] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:What do you want next, an AR assault only mode too? I must be playing a different game from you, cause I swear that's what this game has become |
TEBOW BAGGINS
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
652
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 22:54:00 -
[75] - Quote
hooc roht wrote:no bad idea.
It would be cool if we had some maps that make vehicles nearly impossible to use. this is an easy fix too, i mean they dropped large chunks of busted up titan on the maps for an event, they just need to do this to the gate entrances to the bases that surround a point. if someone jumps there lav into the base well then that happens, but it should not be as easy as it currently is to drive a LAV over every inch of the freakn map |
negative49er
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
47
|
Posted - 2013.07.07 02:02:00 -
[76] - Quote
Then my alt character will be useless and I'll be sad |
Justin Tymes
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
182
|
Posted - 2013.07.07 02:10:00 -
[77] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:Someone said it before, the main problem with Vehicles in Ambush is the fact that you're stuck with it, meaning you're ineffective against Infantry with a brain, while vehicle users have no problem hurting anything in Ambush so they don't need a Supply Depot. What this means is that as soon as you bring AV into Ambush, you're auto-nerfed compared to the team with the vehicles. This is a balance problem that needs to be fixed. \get your own vehicles, then. no one is stopping you.
So the only way to stop vehicles without nerfing yourself and your team in Ambush is to use your own vehicles? Do you realize how flawed this is? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
2145
|
Posted - 2013.07.07 04:32:00 -
[78] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:Someone said it before, the main problem with Vehicles in Ambush is the fact that you're stuck with it, meaning you're ineffective against Infantry with a brain, while vehicle users have no problem hurting anything in Ambush so they don't need a Supply Depot. What this means is that as soon as you bring AV into Ambush, you're auto-nerfed compared to the team with the vehicles. This is a balance problem that needs to be fixed. \get your own vehicles, then. no one is stopping you. So the only way to stop vehicles without nerfing yourself and your team in Ambush is to use your own vehicles? Do you realize how flawed this is? I do believe that is the definition of OP... not agreeing/disagreeing, but if your only counter to something is the very thing you're trying to counter... well, yeah |
Zekain K
Expert Intervention Caldari State
182
|
Posted - 2013.07.07 04:53:00 -
[79] - Quote
I am not ******* reading that abomination of a post, I swear it'll kill my brain. |
Sgt Buttscratch
G I A N T EoN.
343
|
Posted - 2013.07.07 06:29:00 -
[80] - Quote
No, if someone dumps some SP and Isk millions, they can do whatever the cluck they want with their vehicles |
|
Rogatien Merc
Ill Omens EoN.
288
|
Posted - 2013.07.07 06:32:00 -
[81] - Quote
How does *this* topic have 4 pages of replies? |
Cordera Ray
Galactic Warrior Corporation
20
|
Posted - 2013.07.07 21:52:00 -
[82] - Quote
Look it dont matter how many page this topic have it just ppl having there opinion on the matter that Vehicle such as LAV and Tank should not be in a Team Death Match game. For me personally I should not be in there period I don't care if u defend tthem but ppl are going to say what u they got to say that it, if they think LAV and Tank or Dropship should not be in a Ambush type game then there going say it because they know that something like that is going to ruin the gaming experience of a Team Deathmatch mode. Like I said in topic u can either Agree or Disagree of the matter. Dont try to give them the whole adaption crap because most of them just either new or causal or veteran or ppl like me that know what the game should be and not what it should be. Vehicle should be remove from Ambush but Keep in Skirmish that it only purpose thou.
Let the Hate Begin |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1825
|
Posted - 2013.07.07 23:12:00 -
[83] - Quote
Cordera Ray wrote:Look it dont matter how many page this topic have it just ppl having there opinion on the matter that Vehicle such as LAV and Tank should not be in a Team Death Match game. For me personally I should not be in there period I don't care if u defend tthem but ppl are going to say what u they got to say that it, if they think LAV and Tank or Dropship should not be in a Ambush type game then there going say it because they know that something like that is going to ruin the gaming experience of a Team Deathmatch mode. Like I said in topic u can either Agree or Disagree of the matter. Dont try to give them the whole adaption crap because most of them just either new or causal or veteran or ppl like me that know what the game should be and not what it should be. Vehicle should be remove from Ambush but Keep in Skirmish that it only purpose thou.
Let the Hate Begin
just cuz, amirite? |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
793
|
Posted - 2013.07.07 23:15:00 -
[84] - Quote
No, you dunce. |
Tyrunis Bloodstone
sephiroth clones General Tso's Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2013.07.07 23:16:00 -
[85] - Quote
Had a good time playing with Johnford JapJap and others(sorry I forgot the other guys name, I know its "Mem" and Ty?, maybe). Everytime a LAV or HAV came onto the battlefield, mics went live with chatter informing the squad. We then concentrated fire on them. Suffice to say after several Michael Bay explosions, the opposing team thought twice about calling some more in. |
Aythadis Smith
The Generals EoN.
43
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 20:28:00 -
[86] - Quote
If people want to "care bear" over vehicles in AMBUSH then... fine. give it to them but....Less kills, less ISK/ SP and make the kills even smaller then regular AMBUSH. Like 30. Or 25. Hole up these maps into something ridiculously small. Like a small city. Decrease the amount for people. Less then 12.
No installations, no uplinks. nothing. If they want a "care bear" mode, give them a blood sport then.
|
Cordera Ray
Galactic Warrior Corporation
35
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 20:35:00 -
[87] - Quote
Aythadis Smith wrote:If people want to "care bear" over vehicles in AMBUSH then... fine. give it to them but....Less kills, less ISK/ SP and make the kills even smaller then regular AMBUSH. Like 30. Or 25. Hole up these maps into something ridiculously small. Like a small city. Decrease the amount for people. Less then 12.
No installations, no uplinks. nothing. If they want a "care bear" mode, give them a blood sport then.
ok why don't u name any FPS shoot that have a team death match mode now listen do not Mention BF or PS2 we all now what they have. but what im saying is name any FPS that allow to call in a Car to drive around and run over ppl or a Tank. name any FPS out that have that capability until then vehicle need to remove on ambush.
P.S U can always go to Skirmish for High SP and High ISK.and High Score. |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 20:39:00 -
[88] - Quote
Tyrunis Bloodstone wrote:Had a good time playing with Johnford JapJap and others(sorry I forgot the other guys name, I know its "Mem" and Ty?, maybe). Everytime a LAV or HAV came onto the battlefield, mics went live with chatter informing the squad. We then concentrated fire on them. Suffice to say after several Michael Bay explosions, the opposing team thought twice about calling some more in. You've played with johnford japjap? Ask him about a person named Hynox Xitio. bounus points for getting johnford and Hynox in a squad. |
Killar-12
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 20:40:00 -
[89] - Quote
Cordera Ray wrote:Aythadis Smith wrote:If people want to "care bear" over vehicles in AMBUSH then... fine. give it to them but....Less kills, less ISK/ SP and make the kills even smaller then regular AMBUSH. Like 30. Or 25. Hole up these maps into something ridiculously small. Like a small city. Decrease the amount for people. Less then 12.
No installations, no uplinks. nothing. If they want a "care bear" mode, give them a blood sport then.
ok why don't u name any FPS shoot that have a team death match mode now listen do not Mention BF or PS2 we all now what they have. but what im saying is name any FPS that allow to call in a Car to drive around and run over ppl or a Tank. name any FPS out that have that capability until then vehicle need to remove on ambush. P.S U can always go to Skirmish for High SP and High ISK.and High Score.
Chill out and skill into proto swarms then chill some more. |
dazlb72
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
25
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 20:44:00 -
[90] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:To be honest there should be a game mode without vehicles. But removing vehicles from ambush is not a option. I love sitting on top of a hill and using my proto swarms to blow up all the dumb LAV's, derpships and here and then a wild tank. Strangely ive got once called a dirty camper for just blowing LAV's up. That guy didnt liked it to loose logi LAV's.
agreed, why not just make a match where there are no vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |