I am not saying the flaylock needs to be nerfed. I am asking why it is better than a missile from a turret.

Not you, the others.

As for why it is better than the turrets, cause turrets suck, that's a problem.

There damage is similar, but small turrets have a .5 smaller blast radius since they lack a skill which increases it, and I'm pretty sure they also have a lower ROF, not to mention that shooting while on the move is next to impossible.

Dude simply is a user of the cfp. As much as he defends it. When what was in question is the missile turret.

Dude simply is a user of the cfp. As much as he defends it. When what was in question is the missile turret.

I already answered your question.

Flaylock is Infantry Only

Missile turret is not

That is why the flaylcok is more effecient at killing infantry.

The missile turret CAN hit infantry, but its hard.. because it is designed as an anti vehicle weapon. Easier to hit vehicles and large objects.

Is that really that hard to comprehend? or do you just want your tank to be godmode uber awesome at everything.

I'm defending it because you mentioned it and other people jumped on the chance to call it OP, and yes, I do use it, and I have about 1000 SP into it, and it still lacks the 1 shot capablities that people like kitten claim it does.

Would you not defend a 1000 SP investment? If I said missile turrets were OP, would you not argue against it?

I have 10 million sp into my tanks. Not all into weapons but a lot into weapons and enforcer tank. Which gives a boost to missile damage, which is still ****. If you said missile turrets would OP I would fall out from laughter and ask you what game you were playing. Should I not complaint that a handheld weapon that took according to you a fraction of the sp i have spent to get where i am and im useless to kill infantry and your not?

If all four missiles actually hit where I was aiming I wouldn't be here having this conversation bud

Unlike a missile turret it actually goes where you aim. Something that hasn't been looked at or fixed since day one

Because Missile Turrets are underpowered.

Turrets should be at least as good as infantry weapons. I can get out of my Sica and do more direct damage with my Forge Gun than I can with the Railgun. Same story for the Flaylock and missile turrets.

Flaylock = classic example of every fps' n00b tube

Flaylock = Learn2Bunnyhopnub

You realize this retort has more holes in it than randy senorita at a tj donkey show

You realize this retort has more holes in it than randy senorita at a tj donkey show

OP is right CCP was smoking when they made thr flaylock. Shoot at the enemy and boom enemy is dead.
Shoot the turret at the enemy and the enemy lives.
I'm lost for words with CCP, this have to be the worse release I've ever experienced. So much fail in dust it's not even funny.

To say im disappointed with CCP is an understatement. I hope sometime in the future they balance the game and fix all the issues. Until then may the force be with you on the battle field.

Why is it that a flaylock pistol is better at killing infantry than a missile turret? Anyone have any suggestions to ease my mind. I just don't understand how a mini rocket is so much better at killing than a big missile from a large turret. Oh, because infantry don't cry when the weapon is in their hand. Go figure they make a handheld weapon that fires the same type of ammo as a turret and the handheld weapon is more effective. FTW Maybe I should have put my 10 mil sp into flaylocks. Rather than dumping it all into a worthless missile turret for a tank that infantry can dodge the splash damage, which doesn't even hurt the enemy.