As the Subject implies, can we get an actual Developer or PR guy to let us know what the plans are for this?

As the Subject implies, can we get an actual Developer or PR guy to let us know what the plans are for this?

Don't hold your breath.They won't announce anything before the PS4 is launched and widely adopted as to not pull an Osbourne on DUST 514.

Well, i have a shipping manifest here (are they real?) saying CCP has ordered DEV consoles on the ps4, so im asuming their developing on it..

They are definitely working on it. UE3 and UE4 are pretty compatible and the PS4 is the longterm perspective for the game. Just don't expect them to do more than some prototyping and fooling around to get a hang on the tech as early as possible.

Edit for shade emry3: I am deperately looking for the fanfest stuff shown of WoD. Is it still made with CARBON? Are there any pictures?

They have stated,I believe in an interview(may have been a podcast),that they have no plans to even look at the ps4 for dust 514.I may have misheard,or this could change.But I am fairly certain at this point that no,they have no plans for ps4.

They have stated,I believe in an interview(may have been a podcast),that they have no plans to even look at the ps4 for dust 514.I may have misheard,or this could change.But I am fairly certain at this point that no,they have no plans for ps4.

they usually issue political statements a la "we are focusing our capabilities on the PS3 to provide the best possible product right now." wich is probably somewhat true in terms of man hours spend but the fact that they have devkits makes clear that someone is playing around with them.

Then they plan for DUST to fail in about a years time when UE3 and PS3 fall off the face of the earth because 90 million people have moved on to the PS4 and next xbox. As much as people want to say that they will stay with previous generations tech, we all know they don't. Only a small amount of those poor bastards that are jobless or in debt will not move on once the new consoles are released.

I strongly believe that if someone likes and actively plays this game,they can get a ps4 so all those sweet new shiny games,and keep their ps3 for this game.

With ps4 have no backwards compatibility,won't most people be keeping their ps3's anyway? May as well use it for dust if it won't be on ps4.Not everyone always has to buy the new and throw away the old.Buying the new and keeping the old ftw.

CCP has also been known to say to it's customers, "Upgrade or don't play our game." So maybe once the PS4 comes out and gets established they will move it over to PS4 only and then we can truly experience all that DUST can be.

Then they plan for DUST to fail in about a years time when UE3 and PS3 fall off the face of the earth because 90 million people have moved on to the PS4 and next xbox. As much as people want to say that they will stay with previous generations tech, we all know they don't. Only a small amount of those poor bastards that are jobless or in debt will not move on once the new consoles are released.

No plans have been announced. CCP did state they are aware of the PS3's lifecycle and aware of changes in the environment the game is in. Expect plans as they get closer to options being available.

No plans have been announced. CCP did state they are aware of the PS3's lifecycle and aware of changes in the environment the game is in. Expect plans as they get closer to options being available.

I'll give it at least 3 years before the PS4 finally becomes the most common Sony console in the household. I say this based on the actual history on how consoles tend to take a very long time AFTER they are officially released to become a common item in the market to the point where the previous models are rarely seen in one's living room.

Most of my friends won't even bother ordering the PS4 let alone the Xbox One for several reasons:

SONY's PS4

1. No backwards compatibility.
2. Vague details regarding the use of pre-owned games and how Sony is going to deal with that market.
3. More than likely will become pricey as hell just like the PS3 was.

Microsoft's Xbox One

1. No backward compatibility
2. Installation of the game is mandatory.
3. Must delete installation upon returning the hard copy back to the store.
4. $52 activation fee for every time you install a pre-owned copy.
5. Hardly any improvement towards hardware architecture.
6. Mainly designed for home theater entertainment.

EDIT:

Note: Both consoles will require constant internet connection. For those players who lack internet in their own home and have to borrow their neighbor's internet, they're SOL.

So is the way of life of cloud computing, and if you read anything at all, the earlier wikis points to a cloud solution their going to use for ps1,2,3 support. I'm sorry to say, but this is a result of piracy as well as an incentive to make money.. Adapt or die, its natures number 1 rule.

What a lie you just posted. The PS4 won't block used games, The Xbox 1 will though with it's Used Game Fee, PS4 does not require an internet connection at all, let alone constant. Neither does the Xbox, though, on Xbox you must sign in at least once every 24 hours.

Read my post again. You seemed to have missed a few details. I didn't say used games won't work on the PS4. I said the PS4 won't be backwards compatible.

No plans have been announced. CCP did state they are aware of the PS3's lifecycle and aware of changes in the environment the game is in. Expect plans as they get closer to options being available.

You also said that both systems require a constant internet connection which is a lie, or misinformation if you just don't know. So why would we take the rest of your post at face value knowing there is wrong information in it?

You also said that both systems require a constant internet connection which is a lie, or misinformation if you just don't know. So why would we take the rest of your post at face value knowing there is wrong information in it?

The chief of marketing did actually slip gaikai is their current plan a few months ago. Hopefully that has changed.

I'm glad they're cutting used games out of the market. Developers will make A LOT more money towards developing better games. Buying used games is ethically much shadier than pirating.

If I were a developer I'd rather you play my game for free, than pay SOMEONE ELSE to play my game. In each case, I would make no money, but at least if you pirate it some third party isn't making a profit off of my work.

If they really do make it so that things like Gamefly and Gamestop go away then they are taking a step in the wrong direction. Used games, rented games and shared games are nothing to scoff at and honestly after seeing what Xbox 1 is turning into I doubt I will be purchasing that system.

Also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbWgUO-Rqcw

He said the Gaikai was a wonderful tool. Not that they're going with it.

If they really do make it so that things like Gamefly and Gamestop go away then they are taking a step in the wrong direction. Used games, rented games and shared games are nothing to scoff at and honestly after seeing what Xbox 1 is turning into I doubt I will be purchasing that system.

Also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbWgUO-Rqcw

Buying used saves you what? $5 usually? And for that $5 savings you screw the developer out of making ANY money off the sale? It's a terrible and selfish practice, and frankly, it's only legal because making it illegal is too difficult to enforce.

If game prices on consoles scaled based on age and popularity like they do for PC, no one would care about buying used. I haven't paid full price for a videogame in years, and I never buy used... then again, I never buy my games on little plastic discs either.

Buying used saves you what? $5 usually? And for that $5 savings you screw the developer out of making ANY money off the sale? It's a terrible and selfish practice, and frankly, it's only legal because making it illegal is too difficult to enforce.

If game prices on consoles scaled based on age and popularity like they do for PC, no one would care about buying used. I haven't paid full price for a videogame in years, and I never buy used... then again, I never buy my games on little plastic discs either.

Is it any more shady than how EA and Activision operates? Don't get me wrong. Developers should profit, but should they be allowed to profit in a way that kind of screws over the players?

I mean, seriously. A $52 fee for installing a pre-owned copy of a game on the Xbox One? How much do pre-owned copies usually cost? $20 or $30 depending on how long you wait? Then having to cough up an additional $52 because the developers got greedy? That's practically $72-$82 right there. I might as well buy a brand new copy for $60.

EDIT: Oh wait. It's not the developers that are greedy. It's the publishers. I'm screwed either way.

Buying used saves you what? $5 usually? And for that $5 savings you screw the developer out of making ANY money off the sale? It's a terrible and selfish practice, and frankly, it's only legal because making it illegal is too difficult to enforce.

If game prices on consoles scaled based on age and popularity like they do for PC, no one would care about buying used. I haven't paid full price for a videogame in years, and I never buy used... then again, I never buy my games on little plastic discs either.

**** the developers. Greedy snarky little bitches, selling you a game for $60 that isn't even complete and then charge you upwards of $60 or more totaling $120+ just for content that would equal what a game used to come with for $40-$50 dollars. I love my Gamefly. I get to play all the new games and then send them back when I am done with them and it only costs me a couple bucks a month and over half the games I rent from them are so crap I would of stopped buying games all together because of how sad the market is now.

I would feel bad for developers if more than half of the trash they released every year was worth half as much as the trash they released last year. Unfortunately we have left the era of great games though and now it is all about killing more monsters or higher res visuals or continuing that quest that noone really wanted to play in the first place but you just happened to be the only game that was kind of decent at the time. I find it funny that my NES collection is still my biggest game collection and still like 99% of those games more than half of every other systems games I own. Hell I only have 7 PS3 games that I actually own because the rest weren't worth more than a rental to even have them.

Well, that's fine,and I pretty much completely agree with you. Most games, especially on consoles, suck.

That doesn't change the reality of how games work though. There is no difference from a game you buy on a little plastic disc and one that you download online, aside from the medium you purchased it. So why should the guy who buys the plastic disc be able to sell access to the game to a third party, but the person who downloads the game cannot? It just doesn't make any sense, and to argue otherwise is to be a bit of a Luddite.

Honestly, I'll be surprised if disc based gaming isn't a small niche market within 5 years anyway, reserved for only those with particularly poor ISPs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CkF_gm1lPA