Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Caeli SineDeo
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
497
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
I will start off with talking quickly about awoxing and currently what is broken about it. AWOXing I think will be a valuable feature in this game. Slowly growing the trust of a corp or alliance and gaining rights and privy to information. It is sabotage at its heart. So what is the problem currently. People are able to AWOX with out the gained trust. Anyone in a corp can join CBs and Pull in anyone they want. One of CCPs first major gamplay mechanics to make our wins and losses mean something. As any bigger corp is noticing it is impossible to hold that atmosphere because anyone can join your PC battles and anyone can bring squads into your PC battle if they are in your corp. Hellstorm is a perfect example they had to rip their corp into two and put all of their new or more unknown players into a separate corp. This is hurting the corp, goals, and plans for the future.
I understand people are going to participate in this type of gameplay as long as it stays this easy to do.
The problem comes is that CPM member(s) are participating in such a gameplay mechanic that is knownly destroying corps or destroying the enjoyment of PC engagement of corps.
These are members of the community you forced us to have as representatives on CPM. They play a big part on influences of the future of the game. And yet you have members you picked are actively using a mechanic in that is in the game to abuse PC. Their is even video of one of them doing it.
So my question is CCP are you going to take action. Fix this problem. And maybe have major consequences for CPM members who are actively abusing this broken mechanic.
This thread is not about pointing at CPM members or linking videos. I just want CCP to realize that this is a major issue and CPM member(s) are taking advantage of it. Hopefully hear their viewpoint also
So shsare you veiwpoint and thoughts, but do not point fingers. |
Daedric Lothar
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
363
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cry Moar... Tears are delicious. |
jenza aranda
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1405
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1598
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
Problem will be fixed, but keep making more threads. If there's anything we need, it's MORE THREADS. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
3927
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
They already said they're going to make it harder. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=833365#post833365
CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
Punishing CPM members involved would be stupid since they're just using the game mechanics CCP put in place. |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
306
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
What does being a CPM have to do with the issue?
Why not wait until CCP does something to address the issue -- or create holding corps. There is no "destroying the game" going on... there is a shared lesson being learned by those that have been snubbing folks from EVE as not belonging in DUST since its a different game.
Don't say we didn't try to tell you so. |
GLiMPSE X
Elite Gamers Militia
23
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
Caeli SineDeo wrote:I will start off with talking quickly about awoxing and currently what is broken about it. AWOXing I think will be a valuable feature in this game. Slowly growing the trust of a corp or alliance and gaining rights and privy to information. It is sabotage at its heart. So what is the problem currently. People are able to AWOX with out the gained trust. Anyone in a corp can join CBs and Pull in anyone they want. One of CCPs first major gamplay mechanics to make our wins and losses mean something. As any bigger corp is noticing it is impossible to hold that atmosphere because anyone can join your PC battles and anyone can bring squads into your PC battle if they are in your corp. Hellstorm is a perfect example they had to rip their corp into two and put all of their new or more unknown players into a separate corp. This is hurting the corp, goals, and plans for the future.
I understand people are going to participate in this type of gameplay as long as it stays this easy to do.
The problem comes is that CPM member(s) are participating in such a gameplay mechanic that is knownly destroying corps or destroying the enjoyment of PC engagement of corps.
These are members of the community you forced us to have as representatives on CPM. They play a big part on influences of the future of the game. And yet you have members you picked are actively using a mechanic in that is in the game to abuse PC. Their is even video of one of them doing it.
So my question is CCP are you going to take action. Fix this problem. And maybe have major consequences for CPM members who are actively abusing this broken mechanic.
This thread is not about pointing at CPM members or linking videos. I just want CCP to realize that this is a major issue and CPM member(s) are taking advantage of it. Hopefully hear their viewpoint also
So shsare you veiwpoint and thoughts, but do not point fingers.
While I agree that it is an issue, I respectfully disagree with the light in which you have shown it. You make the point that corps have made adjustments and use inflammatory phrases like 'had to tear their corp into two'. It may not have been meant as such but the way it reads, you're saying that having to put in place, what most would consider a best practice, of having a holding corp with the trusted members as a 'end all be all game is ruined' scenario.
Just my .02. I'll admit that I'm not involved in PC yet so this is an unemotional response to something that could be pretty frustrating. |
steadyhand amarr
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
560
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
Sorry I simply see this thread as Pr move everybody saw this type of thing coming I agree it needs fixing but it was better to do it now and get it all sorted rather than later when far more damage could be done. Everything corps are doing now they would have to do anyway. Abit more dramatically than intended. This whole event has Bern a much needed shot in the arm and a wake up call to everyone that this is not ur daddy's shooter
Edit: also saying it's breaking the communty is wrong. Iv never see everyone so active and United in hatried since the ragnum eats baby's thing :-P |
Lunamaria Hawkeye
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
148
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:47:00 -
[9] - Quote
Well in my opinion the use of spies for teamkilling is a minor annoyance mostly. At worst, you can lose a district because of it (or in the case of Hellstorm you can just stomp Betamax regardless lol). Even if you lose a fight because of it you are not guaranteed to lose a district. If you do lose the district you can easily just reclaim it by reattacking, and the enemy spy is basically wasted in the long run. We are not talking about corps or alliances being destroyed because of this gameplay, at least not as far as I know.
The advantage of being able to pull people into a battle is that you can use ringers, or hired mercs. I think this is a great little feature, but I agree that it makes sabotage a little too easy. In my opinion, an easy fix would be to give a specific corp role that allows a person to pull members into a corporation contract. This way sabotage would still be possible, but it would require slightly more finesse and would add the 'trust' element that you mentioned.
CPM members partaking in this form of sabotage is a different issue. I believe that everyone playing the game, CPM members included, should have the freedom to play the game as they see fit. That said, I believe that the players should chose who they want to represent them, just as it is on EVE. This is all that really needs to be said on this issue imo.
TLDR: Give corps a granted role that allows the person to pull a squad into a corp battle. Let the players choose who represents them on CPM. |
BursegSardaukar
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
145
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:51:00 -
[10] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame
Even AWOX'ing aside, there are rookies that just stumble into the queue by accident and then the whole corp flips out on them because they are blocking a squad. It's funny after the fact but there's absolutely a crazy 3-minutes where its just hate spam, lol. |
|
Cross Atu
Conspiratus Immortalis League of Infamy
993
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:55:00 -
[11] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame Posted: 2013.03.27 17:15 [SUGGESTION] - More Control over Corp Battles
Response Posted: 2013.03.29 23:47
CCP FoxFour wrote:Hey,
We agree there needs to be a way for the CEO and directors of a corporation to control who is in a match. We won't be brining any changes to this for Uprising, but we are looking at things we can do after Uprising at some point. We are currently thinking of adding the ability to kick people from the match if you are a CEO or Director.
For now, make sure people joining your corporation understand that they shouldn't be joining these matches unless told to do so. Not the greatest solution, but we are aware and looking at solutions. :) |
Savage Duece
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:58:00 -
[12] - Quote
Anyone else find it strange that the Imperfects are now upset about a broken game mechanic being abused? When it was them AFKing, they were all "blame CCP, we are just using the mechanics given to us" or "HTFU". Not saying OP is guilty of either, just think it is funny that they care so much now. Maybe because this could actually negatively effect them? Funny, cause their AFKing negatively effected others in the community. Anyways, my neckbeard itches, I'm off to rub one out in my basement. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
296
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:11:00 -
[13] - Quote
say what you want, but having one of 6 players from the community being a representative of that community, participating in what is obviously a broken mechanic (and even admitted by themselves) and then going on taking a bath (congrats, its about time) in the tears of all those crying about it, is simply wrong and unjust.
Should this even be a possibility? sure who cares, some people see less natural light than they interact with other humans, and im sure infilitrating and sabotaging a corp on a video game is a lifetime achievement for some.
The simple fact is that this is a console shooter, and NOT some place you can click your heels 3 times and be whisked away to.
Whether I care for it or not, this kind of crap will happen, cause some people have no integrity, hold onto their virginity, suffer from vitamin E deficiency etc.
There needs to be an immediate fix to this broken mechanic to at LEAST allow CEO/directors to kick players from matches.
this crap happened once in a great while on SOCOM... wasn't a big deal cause there was always a voting system in the commands where a majority vote in the room would kick a player. While going to those extremes are not necessary as the groundwork is already in place that these are 'corp' matches, CEO/directors of the corp officially in the match should have the power to boot anyone on their team at any time.
at that point, the mechanic is no longer broken and some people can get some daylight and shave their legs or whatever they do when not glued to their faux-suede loveseat that has a distinct cat odor.
until such time, exploiting a broken mechanic, being a representative of the entire community, and subsequently stroking your e-peen, or box or whatever, is just sad and I for one have lost what little respect I had recently gained for some CPM members
the actions of 1 represent the group. all it ever takes and this is a black eye on what WAS turning out to be a GOOD thing... |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
298
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:25:00 -
[14] - Quote
Savage Duece wrote:Anyone else find it strange that the Imperfects are now upset about a broken game mechanic being abused? When it was them AFKing, they were all "blame CCP, we are just using the mechanics given to us" or "HTFU". Not saying OP is guilty of either, just think it is funny that they care so much now. Maybe because this could actually negatively effect them? Funny, because their AFKing negatively effected others in the community. Anyways, my neckbeard itches, I'm off to rub one out in my basement.
honestly? no
regardless of my or yours or anyone else's opinions of IMPs and many of their members that rightfully deserve to be taken to the woodshed and beaten with a stick(or in some cases HAVE)... they have integrity, which that alone commands the respect of a competitive gamer.
They don't hide behind anything, they don't run around behind you and play grab ass and try to butter you up to do something to you or your corp/team to gain a competitive edge. They simply tell you they are better than you, and then back it up on the battlefield, which is the ONLY place that matters.
AFKing was popular when the game grew stale, the same 4 or 5 maps over and over, with the only other option being 8v8 CBs that didn't award SP, loot or anything else aside from bragging rights. no I don't and have never condoned it, but also it never affected myself or my team.. hanging your hopes on a skirmish pub match where stats never recorded isn't a strong argument for it negatively affecting others...
plus.. the whole AFK thing.. have u done a PC match with AFKers? have you had a CB before with AFKers?
didn't think so.... |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
572
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:29:00 -
[15] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:say what you want, but having one of 6 players from the community being a representative of that community, participating in what is obviously a broken mechanic (and even admitted by themselves) and then going on taking a bath (congrats, its about time) in the tears of all those crying about it, is simply wrong and unjust.
Welcome New Eden, where devs laugh at you when you complain to them about being scammed.
If the mechanics allow it, then it's fine. CCP will turn around and say "oooh, weren't you clever, we won't punish you but we'll stop you from being able to do that".
This game rewards you for being clever, not for being whiny.
Again, no kicking, as there is no long term (match wise) consequence of having recruited a spy, knowingly or not. If they want to sabotage the match, then fine, maybe you lose a district. You can launch a few attacks and take it back easily enough, no harm done. However, if a single spy gets into the game and manages to sabotage a key piece of the game midway through, why not reward him for that? Why allow him to be kicked and cause his actions to have no lasting consequence?
Frankly, if you take people into PC that you can't trust implicitly, you're playing the game wrong.
Much more deadly are the spies who make it into a director spot. They can dissolve your entire corp, and steal all your isk. Beware...
Edit: That isn't to say that I think the mechanics are completely right in its current iteration. Best solution, IMO, is to implement a role that allows people to participate in PC, or something similar. But no kicking. |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1082
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:33:00 -
[16] - Quote
Take a read
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=833641#post833641
They dont like AFK farming because it doesnt benefit them or give them a massive advantage like awoxing does in PC which gives ISK and lots of it |
SoTa ReGnUM PoP
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
162
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:36:00 -
[17] - Quote
Laheon wrote: Frankly, if you take people into PC that you can't trust implicitly, you're playing the game wrong.
Me thinks you making things up that's going on helps your argument none.
No corp was taking un-trusted people. It didn't matter - all you need is an alt - know when the timer for PC is on - then hijack it as the squads get ready to enter.
Other corps will be feeling this burn very soon. If CCP isn't hurrying with a fix - we may as well break this game completely until they do. |
Savage Duece
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:37:00 -
[18] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Savage Duece wrote:Anyone else find it strange that the Imperfects are now upset about a broken game mechanic being abused? When it was them AFKing, they were all "blame CCP, we are just using the mechanics given to us" or "HTFU". Not saying OP is guilty of either, just think it is funny that they care so much now. Maybe because this could actually negatively effect them? Funny, because their AFKing negatively effected others in the community. Anyways, my neckbeard itches, I'm off to rub one out in my basement. honestly? no regardless of my or yours or anyone else's opinions of IMPs and many of their members that rightfully deserve to be taken to the woodshed and beaten with a stick(or in some cases HAVE)... they have integrity, which that alone commands the respect of a competitive gamer. They don't hide behind anything, they don't run around behind you and play grab ass and try to butter you up to do something to you or your corp/team to gain a competitive edge. They simply tell you they are better than you, and then back it up on the battlefield, which is the ONLY place that matters. AFKing was popular when the game grew stale, the same 4 or 5 maps over and over, with the only other option being 8v8 CBs that didn't award SP, loot or anything else aside from bragging rights. no I don't and have never condoned it, but also it never affected myself or my team.. hanging your hopes on a skirmish pub match where stats never recorded isn't a strong argument for it negatively affecting others... plus.. the whole AFK thing.. have u done a PC match with AFKers? have you had a CB before with AFKers? didn't think so.... That was way too much to read. I'm just gonna assume you made some valid points and put me in my place.
|
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
572
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:39:00 -
[19] - Quote
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: Me thinks you making things up that's going on helps your argument none.
No corp was taking un-trusted people. It didn't matter - all you need is an alt - know when the timer for PC is on - then hijack it as the squads get ready to enter.
Other corps will be feeling this burn very soon. If CCP isn't hurrying with a fix - we may as well break this game completely until they do.
Hence my edit
However, if you're accepting recruits with under 2m SP into a corp that WANTS to do PC, without a proper vetting process or going through a recruitment corp, then you're slightly naive regarding New Eden and this has been a horrid wake-up call to you.
Why 2m SP? Cause it takes a couple of weeks of dedication and constant playing OFF your main to get up to that. Reduces the likelihood that you're a spy.
If you're a top corp and accepting anything less than that... Well. You're probably just trying to boost numbers, aren't ya? |
SoTa ReGnUM PoP
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
162
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:41:00 -
[20] - Quote
Laheon wrote:SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: Me thinks you making things up that's going on helps your argument none.
No corp was taking un-trusted people. It didn't matter - all you need is an alt - know when the timer for PC is on - then hijack it as the squads get ready to enter.
Other corps will be feeling this burn very soon. If CCP isn't hurrying with a fix - we may as well break this game completely until they do.
Hence my edit However, if you're accepting recruits with under 2m SP into a corp that WANTS to do PC, without a proper vetting process or going through a recruitment corp, then you're slightly naive regarding New Eden and this has been a horrid wake-up call to you. Why 2m SP? Cause it takes a couple of weeks of dedication and constant playing OFF your main to get up to that. Reduces the likelihood that you're a spy. If you're a top corp and accepting anything less than that... Well. You're probably just trying to boost numbers, aren't ya? I have over 7 alts with over 2 mil SP from sitting on passive SP gain since january. |
|
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
572
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:48:00 -
[21] - Quote
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: I have over 7 alts with over 2 mil SP from sitting on passive SP gain since january.
I said reduces, not eliminates There's always the chance. Hence vetting process. Basing an application on SP alone is not very clever. Bringing someone in to the main corp without you fully trusting them is a bit naive, especially when there's a fair bit at stake. I've come from EVE so I know a little bit about recruiting, but before that I was fairly naive. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
724
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:52:00 -
[22] - Quote
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote:I have over 7 alts with over 2 mil SP from sitting on passive SP gain since january. Looks like you guys still have a _LOT_ to learn about proper vetting.
Just a hint for you bad players that are trying to run 'Real Corporations' in the My Little Pony-land of EVE; when recruiting, check employment history of the DUST merc using the EVE client, note the age of the character and calculate how much passive SP vs active SP he's accrued.
And continue playing the herp a derp game like n00bs. |
BOZ MR
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
147
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:09:00 -
[23] - Quote
Daedric Lothar wrote:Cry Moar... Tears are delicious. You will cry most when we take everything you have, and honestly no one ever infiltrated N-F. This is concern for game not our personal and corp benefits. It must be hard to live with that kind of small capacity brain. |
DeathwindRising
ROGUE SPADES EoN.
26
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:37:00 -
[24] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:They already said they're going to make it harder. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=833365#post833365CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
Punishing CPM members involved would be stupid since they're just using the game mechanics CCP put in place.
Thats like saying we shouldnt punish a bank robber because the bank left the vault unlocked. |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
477
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:44:00 -
[25] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:They already said they're going to make it harder. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=833365#post833365CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
Punishing CPM members involved would be stupid since they're just using the game mechanics CCP put in place. Thats like saying we shouldnt punish a bank robber because the bank left the vault unlocked.
Lol, Its more like they just didnt bother with the vault... or the bank... and just left piles of money on the side of the street with a sign saying:
"Money, sacks that have a $ on, to the left ... gone for lunch..." |
Skihids
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
1430
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:49:00 -
[26] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame
By that logic we should all still be flying the MCC every match to get free SP's and ISK. Let's all abuse every broken mechanic until CCP gets around to fixing it, because that's the way to ensure DUST succeeds.
Yeah...
I guess I'll go order my modded controller because CCP has nobody but themselves to blame if they leave the RoF up so high on the TAC AR. Who cares what it does to the game? |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
310
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:56:00 -
[27] - Quote
What's with all the butthurt?
Spies and divided loyalties are a part of life... and there is no real way to "solve" it perfectly. I can't see any need for CCP to do anything bu improve the tools for corps.
HTFU! Adapt or Die! |
Nguruthos IV
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:57:00 -
[28] - Quote
Skihids wrote:jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame By that logic we should all still be flying the MCC every match to get free SP's and ISK. Let's all abuse every broken mechanic until CCP gets around to fixing it, because that's the way to ensure DUST succeeds. Yeah... I guess I'll go order my modded controller because CCP has nobody but themselves to blame if they leave the RoF up so high on the TAC AR. Who cares what it does to the game?
I would define exploiting as players trying to gain an unfair advantage through the use or abuse of existing mechanisms through ways other than their intended use.
I seriously doubt this is what CCP intended for PC in it's game. Unless CCP wants to make 'the worst game ever' enemies joining your team to reduce your player count, increase theirs, team kill, and in essence "Screen look"... this is exploiting by at least my definition.
IF certain members want to suggest this is all just part of the game, then they truly do not have any interest in expanding or retaining Dust's player base and would rather the game self destruct than their corporation lose some districts. Ironically they still lose the districts because in this place Dust 514 goes under. Anyone with the interest of the community at heart should be disavowing these actions and encouraging CCP to fix the problem rather than continue to exploit it for short term personal gains. |
SoTa ReGnUM PoP
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
163
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:57:00 -
[29] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote:I have over 7 alts with over 2 mil SP from sitting on passive SP gain since january. Looks like you guys still have a _LOT_ to learn about proper vetting. Just a hint for you bad players that are trying to run 'Real Corporations' in the My Little Pony-land of EVE; when recruiting, check employment history of the DUST merc using the EVE client, note the age of the character and calculate how much passive SP vs active SP he's accrued. And continue playing the herp a derp game like n00bs. What? You act like I'm not using these alts to test things - they'd learn NOTHING by checking history. Some are already in corps and are considered 'helpful.' Lol
You scrubs who think you have some special right to be smarter then everyone else make me smile. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
724
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:58:00 -
[30] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:Thats like saying we shouldnt punish a bank robber because the bank left the vault unlocked. No, we won't punish the bank.
We'll laugh at them, just like we do in real life. |
|
Caeli SineDeo
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
504
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 16:05:00 -
[31] - Quote
Yes I meant what I said about Hellstorm being forced to be ripped into two. And more big corps are going to face this.
Do I think players need to be punished. no. Do I think CPM members need to be banned from dust for good or banned at all. No.
These are people that are representatives of the community taking advantage of a broken mechanic that severely hurts corporations. They should lose all CPM privileges in my thoughts. They do not deserve to be a CPM member. We did not choose them. CCP gave them to us and said here are the people in charge of representing you. CCP now needs to accept that the few members are abusing a mechanic hurtful to their game. It show they do not care about the community. CCP needs to remove those that are taking advantage of this mechanic from CPM.
Do I believe AWOXing should be part of the future of dust yes. I think it should but right now this is not awoxing. this is a broken mechanic that the only way for big corps to control is to rip the minor members from their corp and put them in a alt corp until things are fixed. causing them to loose members and have trouble gaining members until the problem is fixed.
People need to have gained trust and made it into a position that allows them to pull squads in or go in solo. Also you should be able to kick people out in the war room. Once battle has started I feel the clone should be left the whole match because they made it that far they earned their right to create choas.
Right now corps have no way to protect them self unless they go to the extremes and as I said break off the trusted group from everyone else and put them into a different corp. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
724
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 16:06:00 -
[32] - Quote
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote:What? You act like I'm not using these alts to test things - they'd learn NOTHING by checking history. Some are already in corps and are considered 'helpful.' Lol
You scrubs who think you have some special right to be smarter then everyone else make me smile. Do you have full passive training plus reasonable (half of max and up) active for the time the characters have existed?
Also congrats on getting them into corps and being 'helpful', I'm sure they were some serious clans from COD or something.
You'd manage that for at most two alt accounts, which means you'll be able to throw (with great effort) about 2 matches per 2 months for corps that have less strict SP requirements. For serious corps you'd probably have much more strict requirements, ever increasing as the game ages.
If you do not see how that raises the bar _VERY_ high then you're a scrublord who knows nothing. For some more on how to go the extra mile look up DNS' fanfest presentation.
Herp-a-derp. |
SoTa ReGnUM PoP
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
163
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 16:13:00 -
[33] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote:What? You act like I'm not using these alts to test things - they'd learn NOTHING by checking history. Some are already in corps and are considered 'helpful.' Lol
You scrubs who think you have some special right to be smarter then everyone else make me smile. Do you have full passive training plus reasonable (half of max and up) active for the time the characters have existed? Also congrats on getting them into corps and being 'helpful', I'm sure they were some serious clans from COD or something. You'd manage that for at most two alt accounts, which means you'll be able to throw (with great effort) about 2 matches per 2 months for corps that have less strict SP requirements. For serious corps you'd probably have much more strict requirements, ever increasing as the game ages. If you do not see how that raises the bar _VERY_ high then you're a scrublord who knows nothing. For some more on how to go the extra mile look up DNS' fanfest presentation. Herp-a-derp. For a guy claiming to know something about all this you seem pretty clueless.
Claiming the other guy must of 'done it to CoD clans' was the best line you used - lmao
And your completely wrong. Try to figure out how this game is broken before you go around claiming the rights to knowledge you don't have.
And your weak provocations to try to get me to reveal where my alts are is childs play. Get on my level scrub ;) |
Skihids
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
1431
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 16:14:00 -
[34] - Quote
Nguruthos IV wrote:Skihids wrote:jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame By that logic we should all still be flying the MCC every match to get free SP's and ISK. Let's all abuse every broken mechanic until CCP gets around to fixing it, because that's the way to ensure DUST succeeds. Yeah... I guess I'll go order my modded controller because CCP has nobody but themselves to blame if they leave the RoF up so high on the TAC AR. Who cares what it does to the game? I would define exploiting as players trying to gain an unfair advantage through the use or abuse of existing mechanisms through ways other than their intended use. I seriously doubt this is what CCP intended for PC in it's game. Unless CCP wants to make 'the worst game ever' enemies joining your team to reduce your player count, increase theirs, team kill, and in essence "Screen look"... this is exploiting by at least my definition. IF certain members want to suggest this is all just part of the game, then they truly do not have any interest in expanding or retaining Dust's player base and would rather the game self destruct than their corporation lose some districts. Ironically they still lose the districts because in this place Dust 514 goes under. Anyone with the interest of the community at heart should be disavowing these actions and encouraging CCP to fix the problem rather than continue to exploit it for short term personal gains.
I believe we are in agreement. It's clear CCP doesn't want to hand the keys to the MCC out to every corp member, they just didn't want to wait to introduce PC until they had it done right.
So some folks exploited the lack of proper controls. I expect that from human nature. I just didn't expect it from a high profile representative who is supposed to be looking out for the overall health of the game.
That's the real disappointment of this mess. Not the loss of a district or two, but the loss of trust in those representing us to improve the game.
|
Finn Kempers
BetaMax. CRONOS.
226
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 16:16:00 -
[35] - Quote
Modded controllers are an offence as that is the use of a third party modification to your own benefit.
This however is a mechanic entirely faulted to the CEO's who let randomers into their corps.
So long, and thanks for all the tears. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
2375
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 16:17:00 -
[36] - Quote
Eve Online has a system in place called Fleets. Before a group of capsuleers go into battle, they often get into a fleet that requires the permission of the fleet commander to join. Once you are in the fleet you are given access to features such as warp-to-friend, broadcast target, broadcast location, fleet bonuses to your ship stats, etc. On top of that, the fleet commander can choose to setup the fleet to only accept members based on standings or make it completely open for everyone in the corp.
Dust can adopt a system like this for planetary conquest battles. Set the battle to only accept members who have earned a certain level of trust wiith the corp.
This will allow the CEO and his directors to mitigate the possibily of an awoxer coming in and destroying any chance of success. But notice I said mitigate and not prevent. If there is anything to learn from Eve Online is that no matter how strict the system is created by the player corps and their CEO the awoxer/spy/traitor/whatever will find a way to get in simply by virtue of gaining your trust and exploiting that trust he has been given when the time is right. |
Skihids
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
1432
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 16:30:00 -
[37] - Quote
Finn Kempers wrote:Modded controllers are an offence as that is the use of a third party modification to your own benefit.
This however is a mechanic entirely faulted to the CEO's who let randomers into their corps.
So long, and thanks for all the tears.
CCP supports the KBM where you can map your trigger to the mouse wheel. A modded controller is no different. As others have pointed out it's trivial for CCP to lower the RoF, so it's obvious they are leaving this open on purpose. Those players who take the initiative are to be lauded for their foresight. It's a player's own fault if they don't.
And yes, I have discovered the wonderful taste of tears.
I have been playing DUST GTA for a few days now with my Gurista Saga fitted out with 92k of modules to allow it to survive two swarms or two hacked AV grenades. It's the most fun I've had in months. I can get more kills from a modest LAV than from the most expensive dropship, and I can make money while doing it!
So remember what your mommy told you and don't play in the street...
|
DeeJay One
BetaMax. CRONOS.
29
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 16:50:00 -
[38] - Quote
Hmm, the possibility about AWOXING PC battles was known for quite a while, just wondering why no one other took the advantage? (especially since I still see IMPs MCC camping) If some very limited (yes limited, there are not many corps doing PC) griefing would be a reason not to be on the CPM then not a single Goon representative should be on the CSM ever. HTFU |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
724
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:05:00 -
[39] - Quote
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote:For a guy claiming to know something about all this you seem pretty clueless.
Claiming the other guy must of 'done it to CoD clans' was the best line you used - lmao
And your completely wrong. Try to figure out how this game is broken before you go around claiming the rights to knowledge you don't have.
And your weak provocations to try to get me to reveal where my alts are is childs play. Get on my level scrub ;) Why would I want to know your alts? Do you even know what my corps name means...
But nice dodging of the educational point of my post about the time investment (active time, not passive) required to get an alt through the (should have been obvious) basic vetting process.
Have fun playing My Little Pony Online. |
SoTa ReGnUM PoP
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
164
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:07:00 -
[40] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote:For a guy claiming to know something about all this you seem pretty clueless.
Claiming the other guy must of 'done it to CoD clans' was the best line you used - lmao
And your completely wrong. Try to figure out how this game is broken before you go around claiming the rights to knowledge you don't have.
And your weak provocations to try to get me to reveal where my alts are is childs play. Get on my level scrub ;) Why would I want to know your alts? Do you even know what my corps name means... But nice dodging of the educational point of my post about the time investment (active time, not passive) required to get an alt through the (should have been obvious) basic vetting process. Have fun playing My Little Pony Online. why do I need to explain something I already did? It wasn't a dodge - it was me giving you a hint to learn to read. Lol
Your corp must be sad that you fail this much at trolling. |
|
Daedric Lothar
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
378
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:11:00 -
[41] - Quote
BOZ MR wrote:Daedric Lothar wrote:Cry Moar... Tears are delicious. You will cry most when we take everything you have, and honestly no one ever infiltrated N-F. This is concern for game not our personal and corp benefits. It must be hard to live with that kind of small capacity brain.
Thats easy, because I don't have anything, nor do I really want anything. I have fun just playing the game and watching all the QQing on the forums. I like Onslaught, but I don't speak for them and I haven't done any of the PC with them.
Attack them if you want, but its no skin off my nose. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
301
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:13:00 -
[42] - Quote
DeeJay One wrote:Hmm, the possibility about AWOXING PC battles was known for quite a while, just wondering why no one other took the advantage? (especially since I still see IMPs MCC camping) If some very limited (yes limited, there are not many corps doing PC) griefing would be a reason not to be on the CPM then not a single Goon representative should be on the CSM ever. HTFU
simple... SOME have integrity and play competitive gaming to actually be BETTER than the opposition, not having to resort to antics observed on a junior-high playground cause Mary-Jane CroTchRoT just called YOU out for havin a small TallyWaCKeR so you want to get back at her...
wash your hands next time you wield that controller cause I know all that cake makes your fingers sticky and then the buttons stick and.. awwww.... but... yea prolly wont help you but maybe... just maybe |
SoTa ReGnUM PoP
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
164
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:19:00 -
[43] - Quote
Pretty simple what's going on here.
EVE is confused.
CCP wants a larger player base - EVE wants traditional CCP game.
One contradicts the other, Lol |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
2376
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:21:00 -
[44] - Quote
DeeJay One wrote:Hmm, the possibility about AWOXING PC battles was known for quite a while, just wondering why no one other took the advantage? (especially since I still see IMPs MCC camping) If some very limited (yes limited, there are not many corps doing PC) griefing would be a reason not to be on the CPM then not a single Goon representative should be on the CSM ever. HTFU
That is very much true. The CSM is currently dominated by the power blocs of New Eden and they were voted in by the players. That's saying something. |
Finn Kempers
BetaMax. CRONOS.
226
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:25:00 -
[45] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:DeeJay One wrote:Hmm, the possibility about AWOXING PC battles was known for quite a while, just wondering why no one other took the advantage? (especially since I still see IMPs MCC camping) If some very limited (yes limited, there are not many corps doing PC) griefing would be a reason not to be on the CPM then not a single Goon representative should be on the CSM ever. HTFU That is very much true. The CSM is currently dominated by the power blocs of New Eden and they were voted in by the players. That's saying something. The CEO of Goonswarm himself has been on it |
Grezkev
The Red Guards EoN.
277
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:28:00 -
[46] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame
I think the Pot is trying to preach to the kettle. |
DJINN Jecture
Purgatorium of the Damned
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:35:00 -
[47] - Quote
Hey mittens made it onto the CSM but I think I even voted for him at the time. He seemed to be a valuable member. The CPM is like PC right now. No way to kick a player and no way to remove them from the team. Please patch this. Jenza has had a nice bath, can we let the water out of the tub now? |
CrotchGrab 360
Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
63
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:37:00 -
[48] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Problem will be fixed, but keep making more threads. If there's anything we need, it's MORE THREADS.
please don't because you know somebody will think you're being serious lol. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS
1430
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:43:00 -
[49] - Quote
BursegSardaukar wrote:jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame Even AWOX'ing aside, there are rookies that just stumble into the queue by accident and then the whole corp flips out on them because they are blocking a squad. It's funny after the fact but there's absolutely a crazy 3-minutes where its just hate spam, lol. Haha, we had a guy quit because of that. A'hhh, good times, good times |
DeeJay One
BetaMax. CRONOS.
30
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:45:00 -
[50] - Quote
DJINN Jecture wrote:Hey mittens made it onto the CSM but I think I even voted for him at the time. He seemed to be a valuable member. The CPM is like PC right now. No way to kick a player and no way to remove them from the team. Please patch this. Jenza has had a nice bath, can we let the water out of the tub now? You will have some kind of vote on that in the coming months probably, you can then elect any candidate you want with as many ALTs you wish. |
|
DTOracle
Universal Allies Inc.
110
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:51:00 -
[51] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame Agreed, I have no problem with corporate sabotage, but currently it is far too easy. It should take time & investment to gain the trust of those around you. & if giving roles is gonna take too long, how about giving directors & CEO's the ability to remove players from PC battles, while in the Warbarge. |
Cross Atu
Conspiratus Immortalis League of Infamy
996
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 17:54:00 -
[52] - Quote
Laheon wrote: Frankly, if you take people into PC that you can't trust implicitly, you're playing the game wrong.
How about if you ever allow the acceptance of applicants who you can't completely trust in advance of ever accepting them? There is no "taking" anyone into PC there's the ability for anyone with the Corp tag to form a squad of anyone and drop into the battle. No roles are required, no trust, no screening of the squad or vetting of any kind is allowed by the current interface. All you have is Open battle finder --> move two tabs right --> hi light "join" --> hit X That's not meta game, that's not an accomplishment, that's just an annoying unfinished game mechanic. Oh and by the way CCP were the first to suggest including kicking, they just haven't gotten to it yet.
In EVE if you attack your fleet you get popped and podded, you don't get to keep docking up and picking out a new ship from the corp hanger to go TK again.
Someone getting a Dir position with roles, passwords and access that takes effort. Someone clicking "join battle" there's no accomplishment in that.
CCP please implement both roles and kicking before the next build, lack of them has a negative impact on PC and it's perception from those who aren't already versed in New Eden. |
Cross Atu
Conspiratus Immortalis League of Infamy
996
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:00:00 -
[53] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Eve Online has a system in place called Fleets. Before a group of capsuleers go into battle, they often get into a fleet that requires the permission of the fleet commander to join. Once you are in the fleet you are given access to features such as warp-to-friend, broadcast target, broadcast location, fleet bonuses to your ship stats, etc. On top of that, the fleet commander can choose to setup the fleet to only accept members based on standings or make it completely open for everyone in the corp.
Dust can adopt a system like this for planetary conquest battles. Set the battle to only accept members who have earned a certain level of trust wiith the corp.
This will allow the CEO and his directors to mitigate the possibily of an awoxer coming in and destroying any chance of success. But notice I said mitigate and not prevent. If there is anything to learn from Eve Online is that no matter how strict the system is created by the player corps and their CEO the awoxer/spy/traitor/whatever will find a way to get in simply by virtue of gaining your trust and exploiting that trust he has been given when the time is right.
+1
The problem with the current situation is the total lack of effective or legitimate tools to manage anything.
With tools in place this kind of thing happening is on the Corps CEO/Dir
Currently it's just an unfinished mechanic be exploited by a high profile player making D514 look less complete/finished. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
724
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:03:00 -
[54] - Quote
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote:why do I need to explain something I already did? It wasn't a dodge - it was me giving you a hint to learn to read. Lol
Your corp must be sad that you fail this much at trolling. heh
On a serious note; learn to manage risk if you want to go above scrub.
On a troll note; your reference to my corp tells me you know nothing about sour veterinarians. |
Vavilia Lysenko
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:03:00 -
[55] - Quote
Laheon wrote:[quote=CHICAGOCUBS4EVER] However, if a single spy gets into the game and manages to sabotage a key piece of the game midway through, why not reward him for that? Why allow him to be kicked and cause his actions to have no lasting consequence?
Absolutely agree with this.
CEO needs to be able to set roles and give permission to enter a PC match.
Kicking someone from a battle who has taken the time and effort to infiltrate a Corp. seems a bit extreme.
Kicking them from the squad is fine, but they should be allowed to remain on the battlefield, as a Neutral Participant.
One outcome I can foresee is that those who are continually denied access to PC battles will leave Corp. and form their own Corporations to get involved in PC, this can only be good for the game imo.
|
SoTa ReGnUM PoP
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
167
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:05:00 -
[56] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote:why do I need to explain something I already did? It wasn't a dodge - it was me giving you a hint to learn to read. Lol
Your corp must be sad that you fail this much at trolling. heh On a serious note; learn to manage risk if you want to go above scrub. On a troll note; your reference to my corp tells me you know nothing about sour veterinarians. There's no need for risk management. I even know a neat trick to put a squad in PC without revealing the person who SL to put them there.
Either way - I want an alt in your corp :D May I put one of my SoTa toons in there? <3 |
zeroknexus
DUST University Ivy League
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:09:00 -
[57] - Quote
**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
Fact 2 : Any act of awoxing by anyone including CPM members is 100% within the current rules. CCP with only change the rules if the devs and only the devs, think it needs changing.
Fact 3 : You have to accept that New Eden is a dark and harsh place where bad things happen. There are no rainbows or kittens or butterflies, if you want those things then I suggest Club Penguin may suit you better. If you decide to stay then stop moaning and watch your back because you may well end up with a nova knife in it courtesy of a fellow mercenary (Paid Soldier).
Fact 4 : I have not been so amused by carebear tears in a long time, thank you. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
724
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:13:00 -
[58] - Quote
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote:There's no need for risk management. I even know a neat trick to put a squad in PC without revealing the person who SL to put them there. Like I didn't already figure out a way to do this a week ago...
Actually found it quite funny that people were getting caught. (not just trolling, just lolling)
Quote:Either way - I want an alt in your corp :D May I put one of my SoTa toons in there? <3
Please do, I'll even squad up for ambush matches and we can even chicken with LAVs if you want. |
SoTa ReGnUM PoP
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
168
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:16:00 -
[59] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote:There's no need for risk management. I even know a neat trick to put a squad in PC without revealing the person who SL to put them there. Like I didn't already figure out a way to do this a week ago... Actually found it quite funny that people were getting caught. (not just trolling, just lolling) Quote:Either way - I want an alt in your corp :D May I put one of my SoTa toons in there? <3 Please do, I'll even squad up for ambush matches and we can even chicken with LAVs if you want. Neaters. I'll set up a new PSN shortly and send in a request to join.
And I also laugh that people get caught pulling squads into PC - it's ridiculously easy not too.
Fail more CCP :D |
Ninjanomyx
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
65
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:21:00 -
[60] - Quote
zeroknexus wrote:**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
Fact 2 : Any act of awoxing by anyone including CPM members is 100% within the current rules. CCP with only change the rules if the devs and only the devs, think it needs changing.
Fact 3 : You have to accept that New Eden is a dark and harsh place where bad things happen. There are no rainbows or kittens or butterflies, if you want those things then I suggest Club Penguin may suit you better. If you decide to stay then stop moaning and watch your back because you may well end up with a nova knife in it courtesy of a fellow mercenary (Paid Soldier).
Fact 4 : I have not been so amused by carebear tears in a long time, thank you.
I see DUST Uni still has Spais.....guess they'll never learn. And you are bad @ Spaiwerk considering you publicised yourself, throwing caution to the wind. Bad Spy in Bad Corp, Balance achieved. |
|
Cross Atu
Conspiratus Immortalis League of Infamy
996
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:33:00 -
[61] - Quote
zeroknexus wrote:**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
Your facts are wrong right at fact 1. CCP has confirmed several times and locations (including a thread that is as of this post on the front page in this very section of the forums) that they are working towards integrating features which prevent the specific situation this thread is discussing.
Being clever and playing the meta game is not equivalent to pressing "join battle" with hostiles in your squad.
I'm honestly surprised by how many players seem to think that the cloak and dagger meta in EVE can be described as the same phenomena displayed but leaning on an unfinished game mechanic within a barely past release build of D514.
Figured the EVE players present would have more pride in their work if nothing else. |
zeroknexus
DUST University Ivy League
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:34:00 -
[62] - Quote
Ninjanomyx wrote:
I see DUST Uni still has Spais.....guess they'll never learn. And you are bad @ Spaiwerk considering you publicised yourself, throwing caution to the wind. Bad Spy in Bad Corp, Balance achieved.
lol :) |
Severance Pay
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
217
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:40:00 -
[63] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:They already said they're going to make it harder. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=833365#post833365CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
Punishing CPM members involved would be stupid since they're just using the game mechanics CCP put in place. Dude, it is an exploit. That is something other games ban anyone for, even in EVE. Nobody wants their fondest creation perversely exploited for evil, CCP included. The banhammer is coming for you, and if it misses we won't. |
zeroknexus
DUST University Ivy League
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:45:00 -
[64] - Quote
Cross Atu wrote:I'm honestly surprised by how many players seem to think that the cloak and dagger meta in EVE can be described as the same phenomena displayed but leaning on an unfinished game mechanic within a barely past release build of D514.
Dust will never have fully finished game mechanics, it will continue to change over the years just as Eve has (it took them 10 years to "fix" the crimewatch mechanic and people still moan it's broken)
As the saying goes "....but you cannot please all of the people, all of the time"
|
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
1760
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:46:00 -
[65] - Quote
zeroknexus wrote:**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
oh? "The game is designed to be like this"? Please read:
CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
There ya go
Why would they fix something what was suppose be part of the game? |
zeroknexus
DUST University Ivy League
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:52:00 -
[66] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:zeroknexus wrote:**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
oh? "The game is designed to be like this"? Please read: CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
There ya go Why would they fix something what was suppose be part of the game?
CCP are not fixing a broken mechanic, they are improving one that, at the moment, is working as designed |
Nguruthos IV
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:02:00 -
[67] - Quote
zeroknexus wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:zeroknexus wrote:**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
oh? "The game is designed to be like this"? Please read: CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
There ya go Why would they fix something what was suppose be part of the game? CCP are not fixing a broken mechanic, they are improving one that, at the moment, is working as designed
So when they fix the code where gunners being shot out of dropship/lav turrets get glitched and can't re-enter the vehicle.... They're not fixing a broken mechanic, they're improving the way it's designed too right?
Technically there is no such thing as a bug, a bug is when your program allows for something you did not intend. These can be accidental, or oversights. A bug is all subjective to the developer as per their intentions.
If anyone honestly thinks CCP intended all this nonsense and it wasn't just a result of poor forethought and or "releasing" from beta too soon then you suffer from some serious distortions in reality.
|
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
1763
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:08:00 -
[68] - Quote
zeroknexus wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:zeroknexus wrote:**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
oh? "The game is designed to be like this"? Please read: CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
There ya go Why would they fix something what was suppose be part of the game? CCP are not fixing a broken mechanic, they are improving one that, at the moment, is working as designed
*Facepalm*...**** that...*facewall*...
Working as designed? if that was true then they won't be talking about CEO's being able to restrict access to PC.
|
Nguruthos IV
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:15:00 -
[69] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:zeroknexus wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:zeroknexus wrote:**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
oh? "The game is designed to be like this"? Please read: CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
There ya go Why would they fix something what was suppose be part of the game? CCP are not fixing a broken mechanic, they are improving one that, at the moment, is working as designed *Facepalm*...**** that...*facewall*... Working as designed? if that was true then they won't be talking about CEO's being able to restrict access to PC.
fanboys and trolls, nothing more. Oh well, there's one more thing. I won't mention it exactly, I'll let your imaginations run wild with this one. But it factors in largely and involves a certain kind of butt kissing, for a certain kind of reason, to a certain kind of person, cause of a certain kind of gender difference.
It's not an intellectual honest position to claim all this is working as intended or just a case of HTFU/ [Meta-Gaming]
Everyone knows this and the only ones claiming otherwise are players who need to exploit or currently are relying on it. |
Deadeyes Anterie
Ill Omens EoN.
553
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:16:00 -
[70] - Quote
It's not a clear cut issue.
None of us know what CCP thinks on the issue because they haven't commented on it. Nobody will get banned for exploits (not that I am saying this is an exploit), and they never have been on a CCP game.
That said just because it's in the game doesn't mean it is intended. There are some game breaking bugs in EvE and if you use them you can get in trouble. Perfect example is when wormholes boosting tracking disruptors gave you a negative value, and the game treated it as an infinite value and allowed perfect firing from 150km. In that case it's clearly not part of the game design. Those who took advantage of it got massive ISK fines.
Jenza is playing a dangerous game, anyone who doesn't think CCP intended this behavior is seeing her in the same light as those who abused broken EvE mechanics for personal gain. I'm sure there won't be any fines, but I'm not sure CCP put any thought into battle queue priority. Just because you can do it doesn't mean you have the right to do it (just like those who could use perfect aiming bugs didn't have the right to use them).
To me the proper approach is to petition CCP and check if this gameplay is indeed intended, or I assume as a member of the CPM you have some method to contact them (at least I hope). That or follow Kains approach and suggest they change the mechanics even you admit in this thread are kind of broken. |
|
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
1763
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:20:00 -
[71] - Quote
Nguruthos IV wrote:fanboys and trolls, nothing more. Oh well, there's one more thing. I won't mention it exactly, I'll let your imaginations run wild with this one. But it factors in largely and involves a certain kind of butt kissing, for a certain kind of reason, to a certain kind of person, cause of a certain kind of gender difference. It's not an intellectual honest position to claim all this is working as intended or just a case of HTFU/ [Meta-Gaming]Everyone knows this and the only ones claiming otherwise are players who need to exploit or currently are relying on it.
Edit: Reading and replied to wrong post lol |
Nguruthos IV
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:21:00 -
[72] - Quote
double post |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
311
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:21:00 -
[73] - Quote
It is simple.
The concept is intended... the inability of a corp to deal with the issue in a meaningful way is not.
I don't think we need all the text walls around here to fight about it. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
1763
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:22:00 -
[74] - Quote
Nguruthos IV wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Nguruthos IV wrote:fanboys and trolls, nothing more. Oh well, there's one more thing. I won't mention it exactly, I'll let your imaginations run wild with this one. But it factors in largely and involves a certain kind of butt kissing, for a certain kind of reason, to a certain kind of person, cause of a certain kind of gender difference. It's not an intellectual honest position to claim all this is working as intended or just a case of HTFU/ [Meta-Gaming]Everyone knows this and the only ones claiming otherwise are players who need to exploit or currently are relying on it. oh ****, we got a badass in here! Why don't you tell CCP to HTFU Since they're fixing it. I think you might have misread or quoted the wrong person
ya i saw the error before you replied. |
SoTa of PoP
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
337
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:22:00 -
[75] - Quote
Crash Monster wrote:It is simple.
The concept is intended... the inability of a corp to deal with the issue in a meaningful way is not.
I don't think we need all the text walls around here to fight about it. You must be new around here. |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
311
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:25:00 -
[76] - Quote
SoTa of PoP wrote:You must be new around here.
I wish. |
sQuatch78
DUST University Ivy League
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 21:40:00 -
[77] - Quote
New Eden's game environment is what sets it apart form most MMOs. And part of that is any way to grief other players and collect their tears. History in Eve has enough examples showing players are always been looking for ways to utilize or break game mechanics to get an edge. It is not a matter of if, but only when this will happen.
So having members of the CPM actively voicing their support tells me to a few things:
- it brings awoxing under a spotlight and makes everyone aware of it
- some members of the CPM at least get what New Eden is all about
- they actually know game mechanics to a detail that allows them to abuse them. And to find other game imbalances along the way.
and let's look at the alternative to this situation: Without both the scale and the vocal support through CPM (in parts), we wouldn't have this discussion at all. ...and CCP might not be looking at fixing roles, squads or corporations in the near future. ... and we would have a topic polarizing Dust players and thus driving conflict in game. ... and we couldn't point to this case of player griefing each other to attract new players to Dust.
anyway, just saying |
Vance Alken
Commando Perkone Caldari State
112
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 21:47:00 -
[78] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame
There should also be a role that controls your team's IFF systems, allowing you to set anyone in-district red or blue. Being set red cuts off all spawn access except for uplinks you've deployed, you can also hack CRUs after the fact to gain a couple of clones.
(being set blue would immediately give access to all equipment of course) |
SoTa of PoP
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
343
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 21:52:00 -
[79] - Quote
sQuatch78 wrote:New Eden's game environment is what sets it apart form most MMOs. And part of that is any way to grief other players and collect their tears. History in Eve has enough examples showing players are always been looking for ways to utilize or break game mechanics to get an edge. It is not a matter of if, but only when this will happen. So having members of the CPM actively voicing their support tells me to a few things: - it brings awoxing under a spotlight and makes everyone aware of it - some members of the CPM at least get what New Eden is all about - they actually know game mechanics to a detail that allows them to abuse them. And to find other game imbalances along the way. and let's look at the alternative to this situation: Without both the scale and the vocal support through CPM (in parts), we wouldn't have this discussion at all. ...and CCP might not be looking at fixing roles, squads or corporations in the near future. ... and we would have a topic polarizing Dust players and thus driving conflict in game. ... and we couldn't point to this case of player griefing each other to attract new players to Dust. anyway, just saying Is this a joke comment? We never had CPM until a few months back and we voiced ourselves well enough.
CPM is suppose to organize it to better present it to CCP - not inspire us to rage about it more like they're currently doing. |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
254
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 22:56:00 -
[80] - Quote
I don't like the feature right now, all I can say is that they WILL fix it eventually. |
|
Caeli SineDeo
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
513
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 03:33:00 -
[81] - Quote
I see a lot of people saying this is eve get tough. These mechanics are put here and CPM members should be able to take equal advantage of them as any other player.
This is a broken mechanic. Even CCP has said it is. If a CSM member was caught taking advantage of a mechanic that was hugely broken they would not be on the board any longer.
Using goons as a example. Goons has thousands of spy's in their alliance. Now with that being said. They are able to control the level of information and the lvl of activities that members have. This means if they create a gaint fleet they can control who joins. And who can add more people to fleet. Also give or take rights away. They are able to be a mass corp and alliance like they want to be because CCP implements the control needed. If CCP all of a sudden walked in and took away these abilities to control goon swarm would crumble like half the other big alliances. Because AWOXing would not be AWOXing anymore it would be just a simple activity.
That being said currently in eve people can work there way up the ranks earn rights and maybe earn privilege spots in fleet to allow them to give more information or add saboteurs to fleet. Which I think works great.
So yes what is happening in dust right now is severely broken and hurting corps and alliances that want to be major competitors within Planet Conquest. They have no control over who joins. Or who has the right to invite players into the battle. They can not kick before the battle starts. No control what so ever. Most people agree it is severely broken.
Then you have CPM member(s) bragging about using this to their advantage. And then also saying they reported it to CCP and have not touched it.
These are suppose to be people that are representing DUST future in CPM. The creation of a player based elective. A government of dust that helps give information to CCP to further the gaming experience. CCP picked the first members for us on the bases that they are here for the community and are going to give great representation. But what has currently happened is showing very poor choices in how to represent the community and help fix things. They are hurting the community and bragging about it. We do not let it stand in our local and national governments. Why should we stand by and not question if action should be taken or not with those representing us in this community. |
Succendo
Goonfeet
20
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 05:36:00 -
[82] - Quote
Don't you people get tired of making these awful threads? |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |