|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
zeroknexus
DUST University
Ivy League
5
   |
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
Fact 2 : Any act of awoxing by anyone including CPM members is 100% within the current rules. CCP with only change the rules if the devs and only the devs, think it needs changing.
Fact 3 : You have to accept that New Eden is a dark and harsh place where bad things happen. There are no rainbows or kittens or butterflies, if you want those things then I suggest Club Penguin may suit you better. If you decide to stay then stop moaning and watch your back because you may well end up with a nova knife in it courtesy of a fellow mercenary (Paid Soldier).
Fact 4 : I have not been so amused by carebear tears in a long time, thank you. |
zeroknexus
DUST University
Ivy League
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:34:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ninjanomyx wrote:
I see DUST Uni still has Spais.....guess they'll never learn. And you are bad @ Spaiwerk considering you publicised yourself, throwing caution to the wind. Bad Spy in Bad Corp, Balance achieved.
lol :) |
zeroknexus
DUST University
Ivy League
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
Cross Atu wrote:I'm honestly surprised by how many players seem to think that the cloak and dagger meta in EVE can be described as the same phenomena displayed but leaning on an unfinished game mechanic within a barely past release build of D514. 
Dust will never have fully finished game mechanics, it will continue to change over the years just as Eve has (it took them 10 years to "fix" the crimewatch mechanic and people still moan it's broken)
As the saying goes "....but you cannot please all of the people, all of the time"
|
zeroknexus
DUST University
Ivy League
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:zeroknexus wrote:**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
oh? "The game is designed to be like this"? Please read: CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
There ya go  Why would they fix something what was suppose be part of the game?
CCP are not fixing a broken mechanic, they are improving one that, at the moment, is working as designed |
|
|
| |
|