Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Caeli SineDeo
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
497
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
I will start off with talking quickly about awoxing and currently what is broken about it. AWOXing I think will be a valuable feature in this game. Slowly growing the trust of a corp or alliance and gaining rights and privy to information. It is sabotage at its heart. So what is the problem currently. People are able to AWOX with out the gained trust. Anyone in a corp can join CBs and Pull in anyone they want. One of CCPs first major gamplay mechanics to make our wins and losses mean something. As any bigger corp is noticing it is impossible to hold that atmosphere because anyone can join your PC battles and anyone can bring squads into your PC battle if they are in your corp. Hellstorm is a perfect example they had to rip their corp into two and put all of their new or more unknown players into a separate corp. This is hurting the corp, goals, and plans for the future.
I understand people are going to participate in this type of gameplay as long as it stays this easy to do.
The problem comes is that CPM member(s) are participating in such a gameplay mechanic that is knownly destroying corps or destroying the enjoyment of PC engagement of corps.
These are members of the community you forced us to have as representatives on CPM. They play a big part on influences of the future of the game. And yet you have members you picked are actively using a mechanic in that is in the game to abuse PC. Their is even video of one of them doing it.
So my question is CCP are you going to take action. Fix this problem. And maybe have major consequences for CPM members who are actively abusing this broken mechanic.
This thread is not about pointing at CPM members or linking videos. I just want CCP to realize that this is a major issue and CPM member(s) are taking advantage of it. Hopefully hear their viewpoint also
So shsare you veiwpoint and thoughts, but do not point fingers. |
Daedric Lothar
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
363
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cry Moar... Tears are delicious. |
jenza aranda
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1405
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1598
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
Problem will be fixed, but keep making more threads. If there's anything we need, it's MORE THREADS. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
3927
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
They already said they're going to make it harder. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=833365#post833365
CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
Punishing CPM members involved would be stupid since they're just using the game mechanics CCP put in place. |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
306
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
What does being a CPM have to do with the issue?
Why not wait until CCP does something to address the issue -- or create holding corps. There is no "destroying the game" going on... there is a shared lesson being learned by those that have been snubbing folks from EVE as not belonging in DUST since its a different game.
Don't say we didn't try to tell you so. |
GLiMPSE X
Elite Gamers Militia
23
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
Caeli SineDeo wrote:I will start off with talking quickly about awoxing and currently what is broken about it. AWOXing I think will be a valuable feature in this game. Slowly growing the trust of a corp or alliance and gaining rights and privy to information. It is sabotage at its heart. So what is the problem currently. People are able to AWOX with out the gained trust. Anyone in a corp can join CBs and Pull in anyone they want. One of CCPs first major gamplay mechanics to make our wins and losses mean something. As any bigger corp is noticing it is impossible to hold that atmosphere because anyone can join your PC battles and anyone can bring squads into your PC battle if they are in your corp. Hellstorm is a perfect example they had to rip their corp into two and put all of their new or more unknown players into a separate corp. This is hurting the corp, goals, and plans for the future.
I understand people are going to participate in this type of gameplay as long as it stays this easy to do.
The problem comes is that CPM member(s) are participating in such a gameplay mechanic that is knownly destroying corps or destroying the enjoyment of PC engagement of corps.
These are members of the community you forced us to have as representatives on CPM. They play a big part on influences of the future of the game. And yet you have members you picked are actively using a mechanic in that is in the game to abuse PC. Their is even video of one of them doing it.
So my question is CCP are you going to take action. Fix this problem. And maybe have major consequences for CPM members who are actively abusing this broken mechanic.
This thread is not about pointing at CPM members or linking videos. I just want CCP to realize that this is a major issue and CPM member(s) are taking advantage of it. Hopefully hear their viewpoint also
So shsare you veiwpoint and thoughts, but do not point fingers.
While I agree that it is an issue, I respectfully disagree with the light in which you have shown it. You make the point that corps have made adjustments and use inflammatory phrases like 'had to tear their corp into two'. It may not have been meant as such but the way it reads, you're saying that having to put in place, what most would consider a best practice, of having a holding corp with the trusted members as a 'end all be all game is ruined' scenario.
Just my .02. I'll admit that I'm not involved in PC yet so this is an unemotional response to something that could be pretty frustrating. |
steadyhand amarr
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
560
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
Sorry I simply see this thread as Pr move everybody saw this type of thing coming I agree it needs fixing but it was better to do it now and get it all sorted rather than later when far more damage could be done. Everything corps are doing now they would have to do anyway. Abit more dramatically than intended. This whole event has Bern a much needed shot in the arm and a wake up call to everyone that this is not ur daddy's shooter
Edit: also saying it's breaking the communty is wrong. Iv never see everyone so active and United in hatried since the ragnum eats baby's thing :-P |
Lunamaria Hawkeye
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
148
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:47:00 -
[9] - Quote
Well in my opinion the use of spies for teamkilling is a minor annoyance mostly. At worst, you can lose a district because of it (or in the case of Hellstorm you can just stomp Betamax regardless lol). Even if you lose a fight because of it you are not guaranteed to lose a district. If you do lose the district you can easily just reclaim it by reattacking, and the enemy spy is basically wasted in the long run. We are not talking about corps or alliances being destroyed because of this gameplay, at least not as far as I know.
The advantage of being able to pull people into a battle is that you can use ringers, or hired mercs. I think this is a great little feature, but I agree that it makes sabotage a little too easy. In my opinion, an easy fix would be to give a specific corp role that allows a person to pull members into a corporation contract. This way sabotage would still be possible, but it would require slightly more finesse and would add the 'trust' element that you mentioned.
CPM members partaking in this form of sabotage is a different issue. I believe that everyone playing the game, CPM members included, should have the freedom to play the game as they see fit. That said, I believe that the players should chose who they want to represent them, just as it is on EVE. This is all that really needs to be said on this issue imo.
TLDR: Give corps a granted role that allows the person to pull a squad into a corp battle. Let the players choose who represents them on CPM. |
BursegSardaukar
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
145
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:51:00 -
[10] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame
Even AWOX'ing aside, there are rookies that just stumble into the queue by accident and then the whole corp flips out on them because they are blocking a squad. It's funny after the fact but there's absolutely a crazy 3-minutes where its just hate spam, lol. |
|
Cross Atu
Conspiratus Immortalis League of Infamy
993
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:55:00 -
[11] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame Posted: 2013.03.27 17:15 [SUGGESTION] - More Control over Corp Battles
Response Posted: 2013.03.29 23:47
CCP FoxFour wrote:Hey,
We agree there needs to be a way for the CEO and directors of a corporation to control who is in a match. We won't be brining any changes to this for Uprising, but we are looking at things we can do after Uprising at some point. We are currently thinking of adding the ability to kick people from the match if you are a CEO or Director.
For now, make sure people joining your corporation understand that they shouldn't be joining these matches unless told to do so. Not the greatest solution, but we are aware and looking at solutions. :) |
Savage Duece
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 13:58:00 -
[12] - Quote
Anyone else find it strange that the Imperfects are now upset about a broken game mechanic being abused? When it was them AFKing, they were all "blame CCP, we are just using the mechanics given to us" or "HTFU". Not saying OP is guilty of either, just think it is funny that they care so much now. Maybe because this could actually negatively effect them? Funny, cause their AFKing negatively effected others in the community. Anyways, my neckbeard itches, I'm off to rub one out in my basement. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
296
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:11:00 -
[13] - Quote
say what you want, but having one of 6 players from the community being a representative of that community, participating in what is obviously a broken mechanic (and even admitted by themselves) and then going on taking a bath (congrats, its about time) in the tears of all those crying about it, is simply wrong and unjust.
Should this even be a possibility? sure who cares, some people see less natural light than they interact with other humans, and im sure infilitrating and sabotaging a corp on a video game is a lifetime achievement for some.
The simple fact is that this is a console shooter, and NOT some place you can click your heels 3 times and be whisked away to.
Whether I care for it or not, this kind of crap will happen, cause some people have no integrity, hold onto their virginity, suffer from vitamin E deficiency etc.
There needs to be an immediate fix to this broken mechanic to at LEAST allow CEO/directors to kick players from matches.
this crap happened once in a great while on SOCOM... wasn't a big deal cause there was always a voting system in the commands where a majority vote in the room would kick a player. While going to those extremes are not necessary as the groundwork is already in place that these are 'corp' matches, CEO/directors of the corp officially in the match should have the power to boot anyone on their team at any time.
at that point, the mechanic is no longer broken and some people can get some daylight and shave their legs or whatever they do when not glued to their faux-suede loveseat that has a distinct cat odor.
until such time, exploiting a broken mechanic, being a representative of the entire community, and subsequently stroking your e-peen, or box or whatever, is just sad and I for one have lost what little respect I had recently gained for some CPM members
the actions of 1 represent the group. all it ever takes and this is a black eye on what WAS turning out to be a GOOD thing... |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
298
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:25:00 -
[14] - Quote
Savage Duece wrote:Anyone else find it strange that the Imperfects are now upset about a broken game mechanic being abused? When it was them AFKing, they were all "blame CCP, we are just using the mechanics given to us" or "HTFU". Not saying OP is guilty of either, just think it is funny that they care so much now. Maybe because this could actually negatively effect them? Funny, because their AFKing negatively effected others in the community. Anyways, my neckbeard itches, I'm off to rub one out in my basement.
honestly? no
regardless of my or yours or anyone else's opinions of IMPs and many of their members that rightfully deserve to be taken to the woodshed and beaten with a stick(or in some cases HAVE)... they have integrity, which that alone commands the respect of a competitive gamer.
They don't hide behind anything, they don't run around behind you and play grab ass and try to butter you up to do something to you or your corp/team to gain a competitive edge. They simply tell you they are better than you, and then back it up on the battlefield, which is the ONLY place that matters.
AFKing was popular when the game grew stale, the same 4 or 5 maps over and over, with the only other option being 8v8 CBs that didn't award SP, loot or anything else aside from bragging rights. no I don't and have never condoned it, but also it never affected myself or my team.. hanging your hopes on a skirmish pub match where stats never recorded isn't a strong argument for it negatively affecting others...
plus.. the whole AFK thing.. have u done a PC match with AFKers? have you had a CB before with AFKers?
didn't think so.... |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
572
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:29:00 -
[15] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:say what you want, but having one of 6 players from the community being a representative of that community, participating in what is obviously a broken mechanic (and even admitted by themselves) and then going on taking a bath (congrats, its about time) in the tears of all those crying about it, is simply wrong and unjust.
Welcome New Eden, where devs laugh at you when you complain to them about being scammed.
If the mechanics allow it, then it's fine. CCP will turn around and say "oooh, weren't you clever, we won't punish you but we'll stop you from being able to do that".
This game rewards you for being clever, not for being whiny.
Again, no kicking, as there is no long term (match wise) consequence of having recruited a spy, knowingly or not. If they want to sabotage the match, then fine, maybe you lose a district. You can launch a few attacks and take it back easily enough, no harm done. However, if a single spy gets into the game and manages to sabotage a key piece of the game midway through, why not reward him for that? Why allow him to be kicked and cause his actions to have no lasting consequence?
Frankly, if you take people into PC that you can't trust implicitly, you're playing the game wrong.
Much more deadly are the spies who make it into a director spot. They can dissolve your entire corp, and steal all your isk. Beware...
Edit: That isn't to say that I think the mechanics are completely right in its current iteration. Best solution, IMO, is to implement a role that allows people to participate in PC, or something similar. But no kicking. |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1082
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:33:00 -
[16] - Quote
Take a read
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=833641#post833641
They dont like AFK farming because it doesnt benefit them or give them a massive advantage like awoxing does in PC which gives ISK and lots of it |
SoTa ReGnUM PoP
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
162
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:36:00 -
[17] - Quote
Laheon wrote: Frankly, if you take people into PC that you can't trust implicitly, you're playing the game wrong.
Me thinks you making things up that's going on helps your argument none.
No corp was taking un-trusted people. It didn't matter - all you need is an alt - know when the timer for PC is on - then hijack it as the squads get ready to enter.
Other corps will be feeling this burn very soon. If CCP isn't hurrying with a fix - we may as well break this game completely until they do. |
Savage Duece
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:37:00 -
[18] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Savage Duece wrote:Anyone else find it strange that the Imperfects are now upset about a broken game mechanic being abused? When it was them AFKing, they were all "blame CCP, we are just using the mechanics given to us" or "HTFU". Not saying OP is guilty of either, just think it is funny that they care so much now. Maybe because this could actually negatively effect them? Funny, because their AFKing negatively effected others in the community. Anyways, my neckbeard itches, I'm off to rub one out in my basement. honestly? no regardless of my or yours or anyone else's opinions of IMPs and many of their members that rightfully deserve to be taken to the woodshed and beaten with a stick(or in some cases HAVE)... they have integrity, which that alone commands the respect of a competitive gamer. They don't hide behind anything, they don't run around behind you and play grab ass and try to butter you up to do something to you or your corp/team to gain a competitive edge. They simply tell you they are better than you, and then back it up on the battlefield, which is the ONLY place that matters. AFKing was popular when the game grew stale, the same 4 or 5 maps over and over, with the only other option being 8v8 CBs that didn't award SP, loot or anything else aside from bragging rights. no I don't and have never condoned it, but also it never affected myself or my team.. hanging your hopes on a skirmish pub match where stats never recorded isn't a strong argument for it negatively affecting others... plus.. the whole AFK thing.. have u done a PC match with AFKers? have you had a CB before with AFKers? didn't think so.... That was way too much to read. I'm just gonna assume you made some valid points and put me in my place.
|
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
572
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:39:00 -
[19] - Quote
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: Me thinks you making things up that's going on helps your argument none.
No corp was taking un-trusted people. It didn't matter - all you need is an alt - know when the timer for PC is on - then hijack it as the squads get ready to enter.
Other corps will be feeling this burn very soon. If CCP isn't hurrying with a fix - we may as well break this game completely until they do.
Hence my edit
However, if you're accepting recruits with under 2m SP into a corp that WANTS to do PC, without a proper vetting process or going through a recruitment corp, then you're slightly naive regarding New Eden and this has been a horrid wake-up call to you.
Why 2m SP? Cause it takes a couple of weeks of dedication and constant playing OFF your main to get up to that. Reduces the likelihood that you're a spy.
If you're a top corp and accepting anything less than that... Well. You're probably just trying to boost numbers, aren't ya? |
SoTa ReGnUM PoP
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
162
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:41:00 -
[20] - Quote
Laheon wrote:SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: Me thinks you making things up that's going on helps your argument none.
No corp was taking un-trusted people. It didn't matter - all you need is an alt - know when the timer for PC is on - then hijack it as the squads get ready to enter.
Other corps will be feeling this burn very soon. If CCP isn't hurrying with a fix - we may as well break this game completely until they do.
Hence my edit However, if you're accepting recruits with under 2m SP into a corp that WANTS to do PC, without a proper vetting process or going through a recruitment corp, then you're slightly naive regarding New Eden and this has been a horrid wake-up call to you. Why 2m SP? Cause it takes a couple of weeks of dedication and constant playing OFF your main to get up to that. Reduces the likelihood that you're a spy. If you're a top corp and accepting anything less than that... Well. You're probably just trying to boost numbers, aren't ya? I have over 7 alts with over 2 mil SP from sitting on passive SP gain since january. |
|
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
572
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:48:00 -
[21] - Quote
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: I have over 7 alts with over 2 mil SP from sitting on passive SP gain since january.
I said reduces, not eliminates There's always the chance. Hence vetting process. Basing an application on SP alone is not very clever. Bringing someone in to the main corp without you fully trusting them is a bit naive, especially when there's a fair bit at stake. I've come from EVE so I know a little bit about recruiting, but before that I was fairly naive. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
724
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 14:52:00 -
[22] - Quote
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote:I have over 7 alts with over 2 mil SP from sitting on passive SP gain since january. Looks like you guys still have a _LOT_ to learn about proper vetting.
Just a hint for you bad players that are trying to run 'Real Corporations' in the My Little Pony-land of EVE; when recruiting, check employment history of the DUST merc using the EVE client, note the age of the character and calculate how much passive SP vs active SP he's accrued.
And continue playing the herp a derp game like n00bs. |
BOZ MR
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
147
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:09:00 -
[23] - Quote
Daedric Lothar wrote:Cry Moar... Tears are delicious. You will cry most when we take everything you have, and honestly no one ever infiltrated N-F. This is concern for game not our personal and corp benefits. It must be hard to live with that kind of small capacity brain. |
DeathwindRising
ROGUE SPADES EoN.
26
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:37:00 -
[24] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:They already said they're going to make it harder. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=833365#post833365CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
Punishing CPM members involved would be stupid since they're just using the game mechanics CCP put in place.
Thats like saying we shouldnt punish a bank robber because the bank left the vault unlocked. |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
477
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:44:00 -
[25] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:They already said they're going to make it harder. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=833365#post833365CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
Punishing CPM members involved would be stupid since they're just using the game mechanics CCP put in place. Thats like saying we shouldnt punish a bank robber because the bank left the vault unlocked.
Lol, Its more like they just didnt bother with the vault... or the bank... and just left piles of money on the side of the street with a sign saying:
"Money, sacks that have a $ on, to the left ... gone for lunch..." |
Skihids
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
1430
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:49:00 -
[26] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame
By that logic we should all still be flying the MCC every match to get free SP's and ISK. Let's all abuse every broken mechanic until CCP gets around to fixing it, because that's the way to ensure DUST succeeds.
Yeah...
I guess I'll go order my modded controller because CCP has nobody but themselves to blame if they leave the RoF up so high on the TAC AR. Who cares what it does to the game? |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
310
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:56:00 -
[27] - Quote
What's with all the butthurt?
Spies and divided loyalties are a part of life... and there is no real way to "solve" it perfectly. I can't see any need for CCP to do anything bu improve the tools for corps.
HTFU! Adapt or Die! |
Nguruthos IV
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:57:00 -
[28] - Quote
Skihids wrote:jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame By that logic we should all still be flying the MCC every match to get free SP's and ISK. Let's all abuse every broken mechanic until CCP gets around to fixing it, because that's the way to ensure DUST succeeds. Yeah... I guess I'll go order my modded controller because CCP has nobody but themselves to blame if they leave the RoF up so high on the TAC AR. Who cares what it does to the game?
I would define exploiting as players trying to gain an unfair advantage through the use or abuse of existing mechanisms through ways other than their intended use.
I seriously doubt this is what CCP intended for PC in it's game. Unless CCP wants to make 'the worst game ever' enemies joining your team to reduce your player count, increase theirs, team kill, and in essence "Screen look"... this is exploiting by at least my definition.
IF certain members want to suggest this is all just part of the game, then they truly do not have any interest in expanding or retaining Dust's player base and would rather the game self destruct than their corporation lose some districts. Ironically they still lose the districts because in this place Dust 514 goes under. Anyone with the interest of the community at heart should be disavowing these actions and encouraging CCP to fix the problem rather than continue to exploit it for short term personal gains. |
SoTa ReGnUM PoP
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
163
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:57:00 -
[29] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote:I have over 7 alts with over 2 mil SP from sitting on passive SP gain since january. Looks like you guys still have a _LOT_ to learn about proper vetting. Just a hint for you bad players that are trying to run 'Real Corporations' in the My Little Pony-land of EVE; when recruiting, check employment history of the DUST merc using the EVE client, note the age of the character and calculate how much passive SP vs active SP he's accrued. And continue playing the herp a derp game like n00bs. What? You act like I'm not using these alts to test things - they'd learn NOTHING by checking history. Some are already in corps and are considered 'helpful.' Lol
You scrubs who think you have some special right to be smarter then everyone else make me smile. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
724
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:58:00 -
[30] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:Thats like saying we shouldnt punish a bank robber because the bank left the vault unlocked. No, we won't punish the bank.
We'll laugh at them, just like we do in real life. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |