|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nguruthos IV
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
6
   |
Posted - 2013.05.20 15:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
Skihids wrote:jenza aranda wrote:awoxing is absolutely too easy but shouldnt be impossible. Thats why im suggesting a role that is attached to being able to join corp matches, that way if the CEO/director trusts the wrong person, they only have themselves to blame By that logic we should all still be flying the MCC every match to get free SP's and ISK. Let's all abuse every broken mechanic until CCP gets around to fixing it, because that's the way to ensure DUST succeeds. Yeah... I guess I'll go order my modded controller because CCP has nobody but themselves to blame if they leave the RoF up so high on the TAC AR. Who cares what it does to the game?
I would define exploiting as players trying to gain an unfair advantage through the use or abuse of existing mechanisms through ways other than their intended use.
I seriously doubt this is what CCP intended for PC in it's game. Unless CCP wants to make 'the worst game ever' enemies joining your team to reduce your player count, increase theirs, team kill, and in essence "Screen look"... this is exploiting by at least my definition.
IF certain members want to suggest this is all just part of the game, then they truly do not have any interest in expanding or retaining Dust's player base and would rather the game self destruct than their corporation lose some districts. Ironically they still lose the districts because in this place Dust 514 goes under. Anyone with the interest of the community at heart should be disavowing these actions and encouraging CCP to fix the problem rather than continue to exploit it for short term personal gains. |
Nguruthos IV
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
zeroknexus wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:zeroknexus wrote:**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
oh? "The game is designed to be like this"? Please read: CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
There ya go  Why would they fix something what was suppose be part of the game? CCP are not fixing a broken mechanic, they are improving one that, at the moment, is working as designed
So when they fix the code where gunners being shot out of dropship/lav turrets get glitched and can't re-enter the vehicle.... They're not fixing a broken mechanic, they're improving the way it's designed too right?
Technically there is no such thing as a bug, a bug is when your program allows for something you did not intend. These can be accidental, or oversights. A bug is all subjective to the developer as per their intentions.
If anyone honestly thinks CCP intended all this nonsense and it wasn't just a result of poor forethought and or "releasing" from beta too soon then you suffer from some serious distortions in reality.
|
Nguruthos IV
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:zeroknexus wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:zeroknexus wrote:**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
oh? "The game is designed to be like this"? Please read: CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
There ya go Why would they fix something what was suppose be part of the game? CCP are not fixing a broken mechanic, they are improving one that, at the moment, is working as designed *Facepalm*...**** that...*facewall*... Working as designed? if that was true then they won't be talking about CEO's being able to restrict access to PC.
fanboys and trolls, nothing more. Oh well, there's one more thing.
I won't mention it exactly, I'll let your imaginations run wild with this one. But it factors in largely and involves a certain kind of butt kissing, for a certain kind of reason, to a certain kind of person, cause of a certain kind of gender difference.
It's not an intellectual honest position to claim all this is working as intended or just a case of HTFU/ [Meta-Gaming]
Everyone knows this and the only ones claiming otherwise are players who need to exploit or currently are relying on it. |
Nguruthos IV
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
double post |
|
|
| |
|