|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
EoN.
1760
   |
Posted - 2013.05.20 18:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
zeroknexus wrote:**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
oh? "The game is designed to be like this"? Please read:
CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
There ya go 
Why would they fix something what was suppose be part of the game? |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
EoN.
1763
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
zeroknexus wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:zeroknexus wrote:**** THREADNOUGHT ALERT ****
Lol, yet another awoxing thread that is turning into a threadnought, you guys just don't get it do you?
Fact 1 : CCP are fully aware of the situation. You guys do understand they actually designed the game to be like this right?
oh? "The game is designed to be like this"? Please read: CCP Praetorian wrote:Hey guys.
Cool thread, full of good ideas!
We agree that it would be better to be able to restrict access to PC battles, and are currently discussing how we would implement that.
What we are discussing is doing this in phases, i.e. start with giving CEO's and directors the ability to kick from matches, set roles on members that you want participating in PC matches, to forming up into larger teams prior to the PC match taking place. We will add this to the roadmap and share more details in few weeks time for feedback and discussion.
There ya go Why would they fix something what was suppose be part of the game? CCP are not fixing a broken mechanic, they are improving one that, at the moment, is working as designed
*Facepalm*...**** that...*facewall*...
Working as designed? if that was true then they won't be talking about CEO's being able to restrict access to PC.
|
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
EoN.
1763
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
Nguruthos IV wrote:fanboys and trolls, nothing more. Oh well, there's one more thing. I won't mention it exactly, I'll let your imaginations run wild with this one. But it factors in largely and involves a certain kind of butt kissing, for a certain kind of reason, to a certain kind of person, cause of a certain kind of gender difference. It's not an intellectual honest position to claim all this is working as intended or just a case of HTFU/ [Meta-Gaming]Everyone knows this and the only ones claiming otherwise are players who need to exploit or currently are relying on it.
Edit: Reading and replied to wrong post lol |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
EoN.
1763
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 19:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
Nguruthos IV wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Nguruthos IV wrote:fanboys and trolls, nothing more. Oh well, there's one more thing. I won't mention it exactly, I'll let your imaginations run wild with this one. But it factors in largely and involves a certain kind of butt kissing, for a certain kind of reason, to a certain kind of person, cause of a certain kind of gender difference. It's not an intellectual honest position to claim all this is working as intended or just a case of HTFU/ [Meta-Gaming]Everyone knows this and the only ones claiming otherwise are players who need to exploit or currently are relying on it. oh ****, we got a badass in here! Why don't you tell CCP to HTFU  Since they're fixing it. I think you might have misread or quoted the wrong person
ya i saw the error before you replied. |
|
|
| |
|