Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
4380
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 06:00:00 -
[61] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:This recent wave of "spies" isn't a high-level example of what the metagame can (and will) turn into.
It's a starting point for a sabotage Corp to get their name into the public eye as "the ones who did it first". And they didn't do a great job, so this fuss will die down soon enough, but they've shown people who didn't see it coming (poor fools) what to expect in future, and opened the doors for others to do it right.
I, for one, am looking forward to seeing where this goes.
Whole reason why I linked a few propaganda posters too. |
Cass Barr
Red Star. EoN.
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 06:05:00 -
[62] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Cass Barr wrote:What tools are those? Kick everyone out of the main PC corp leave only your trusted squad leaders, get one of your directors to make a isk transfer alt and setup an secondary 'Grunt' Corp. Use the secondary corp to pull invites from. Keep roster of folks in second corp track their behavior and performance and trust levels. People in the PC squad leader corp will be the only ones able to pull folks from the grunt corp into planetary conquest since grunt corp will not be on the map at all. Its pretty simple stupid, prevent random squads of strangers at least, unless you are really bad at recruiting you shouldn't get more than 3 turn coats and if you keep filtering them out that should all go away.
That's not a "tool". That's an incredibly clumsy work around to a broken and poorly thought out system. While it will work in the short term, is a CPM really suggesting that's an acceptable system? Make every corporation with aspirations to participate in PC create multiple corps, alts for every officer, and additional in-game chat and communication channels as an ass-backwards way to create member access rights? Hell CCP should want to avoid such a system simply to save on server resources. Take off your fanboy glasses, they're not an actual requirement of being a CPM member. Clumsy annoyances for the sake of clumsy annoyances isn't "meta", it's just a clumsy annoyance. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
1269
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 06:12:00 -
[63] - Quote
sammus420 wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote: My issue is the overemphasis on the metagame and not the actual gameplay. It is much more entertaining to watch corps argue about who is better and have that rivalry build over a little time. And then when both corps are tired of talking and dodging, they finally battle it out.
That is more exciting than, "Hey guys, I joined your corp and teamkilled everyone".
I respectfully disagree. Two corps talk a lot of crap then fight it out. The loser walks away licking their wounds and thinking "Man we didn't win but we gave it our all." It's like 2 little kids fighting, they usually end up friends after the fight. With this tactic that is being employed, the loser suffers a more humiliating defeat, they never have a chance to say "We gave it out best." Instead they're left saying "Those dicks never even gave us a chance omg I wish we could murder them, those dirty rotten bastards." To most victors, this is a far more enjoyable outcome
I'm talking about what is more entertaining....not which is more damaging. And quite frankly, doing it the old-fashioned way is more damaging.
Let's say that you infiltrate, spy, manage to build rank and kick everyone out of the corp and steal ISK. All that you've done is set them back a little. Some people may leave the corp but the people that helped build the corp, the core members will stay and/or rebuild. You can steal all of their ISK but they will just start over and get back to where they were. Meanwhile, you are getting some likes on the forums for outing them.
Scenario 2 could be that you infiltrate them and teamkill them or sabotage their battle. Worst case scenario is that they lose that battle or that district. But if they are better than their opponents, they will launch an attack and reclaim the district. You can always bounce back from an infiltration.
But you want to know what is more damaging than that? Corp A and Corp B talking smack to each other so then they decide to battle it out finally. Corp A beats B...B wants revenge so they battle again and Corp A smacks them again. And a third and 4th time. After awhile, Corp B is going to realize that they are just embarassing themselves because they can not defeat Corp A and they will just stop their campaign. Corp B is now demoralized. |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
448
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 06:55:00 -
[64] - Quote
Meta-gaming, the thing politicians would enjoy most if they played video games. Where somebody is rewarded and praised for lying, stealing, deceiving, manipulating and betraying trust for their (or their groups) own good or agenda.
When you apply it to real life, I guess the king of meta-gaming is the current US administration |
Grezkev
The Red Guards EoN.
270
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 07:03:00 -
[65] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Meta-gaming, the thing politicians would enjoy most if they played video games. Where somebody is rewarded and praised for lying, stealing, deceiving, manipulating and betraying trust for their (or their groups) own good or agenda. When you apply it to real life, I guess the king of meta-gaming is the current US administration
That is...amazingly true. Wow. I'm impressed. |
Deluxe Edition
TeamPlayers EoN.
229
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 12:34:00 -
[66] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:This recent wave of "spies" isn't a high-level example of what the metagame can (and will) turn into.
It's a starting point for a sabotage Corp to get their name into the public eye as "the ones who did it first". And they didn't do a great job, so this fuss will die down soon enough, but they've shown people who didn't see it coming (poor fools) what to expect in future, and opened the doors for others to do it right.
I, for one, am looking forward to seeing where this goes. Whole reason why I linked a few propaganda posters too.
lol @ didn't see it coming... their have been posts for months about it. Everyone knew this would be abused at some point. I'm in PC to fight tough matches. Not sit in the enemy MCC and cook grenades on myself to take planets. |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
300
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 12:48:00 -
[67] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Meta-gaming, the thing politicians would enjoy most if they played video games. Where somebody is rewarded and praised for lying, stealing, deceiving, manipulating and betraying trust for their (or their groups) own good or agenda. When you apply it to real life, I guess the king of meta-gaming is the current US administration
I think "administration" is too small/partisan a target... how about we just throw Washington in that role. |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
755
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 12:56:00 -
[68] - Quote
Deluxe Edition wrote:The difference is in EvE it takes Months if not years to develop a spy and infiltrate a corp having to get past API searches and once your in the corp you have to socialize and convince the leadership to give you role to access corp isk and hangers. In dust all you have to do is get your application accepted and then you can sabotage every corp match without ever being detected by pulling the plug on their internet after queing and enemy force into battle.
That's some meta game..... in depth stuff.
Thats the problem. Holding the PC matches ransom is too easy and is only the shallowest of meta. If, say, only the mcc commander held the kick power ability and you got a long term spy into the match to fill that position and throw the match, then yeah. Thats fine. But currently its just too simple to really be called spying, its borderline game mechanic abuse because of its absurd simplicity. It really isnt even close to being EVE's meta game equal. |
DeathwindRising
ROGUE SPADES EoN.
25
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 13:54:00 -
[69] - Quote
Banned From Forums wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78868&find=unread https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=79008&find=unreadhttps://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=79174&find=unread^ These fine examples above are what I am talking about. Playing the game beyond the rules established, playing the game more than the game intended. Fitting balance numbers are considered part of the game as they all wind up effecting numbers on the field when it comes to shooting each other. Getting people to back stab your supposed best friend, causing immeasurable damage well beyond DPS numbers an AR can put out in a million life times. Deleting your corp or booting the CEO out in a hostile take over and getting it pitted into a war it cannot win nor stop. Watching your little empire crumble because you trusted the wrong guy. Then getting your revenge.... This is meta-gaming. You are all playing it and those most unaware of it are pawns on the board. Kitten Meta gaming. If CCP wants to have meta gaming in a FPS they can say goodbye to Dust. FPS don't like meta gaming. They like shooting people in the face. Dust reviews across the board have been subpar.
eve online reviews were the same when it first came out. now eveyone ask ccp how theyre thriving lol |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
563
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 14:31:00 -
[70] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Let's say that you infiltrate, spy, manage to build rank and kick everyone out of the corp and steal ISK. All that you've done is set them back a little. Some people may leave the corp but the people that helped build the corp, the core members will stay and/or rebuild. You can steal all of their ISK but they will just start over and get back to where they were. Meanwhile, you are getting some likes on the forums for outing them.
Scenario 2 could be that you infiltrate them and teamkill them or sabotage their battle. Worst case scenario is that they lose that battle or that district. But if they are better than their opponents, they will launch an attack and reclaim the district. You can always bounce back from an infiltration.
Ever heard of BoB? Band of brothers, btw, the alliance on EvE.
They held a huge swathe of nullsec. A disgruntled director sold out, dissolved the alliance, stole lots of isk.
The alliance name was stolen, as some salt in the wound, and the alliance restarted, as KenZoku. KenZoku were never really a major player, having never been able to recover from the massive loss of assets. It is hugely damaging if you can steal a couple of bil from a Dust corp, get rid of all members and cause the corp to lose all their districts. They would lose members to other corporations, and they would need to build up the 240m+ they would need to retake even a single district. It would set them back a week at the very least, in which time, other corporations would have rushed in and consolidated their hold on the lost planets.
In scenario 2, you can do that as many times as you would like. Have a few of your members create an alt each, send them into a corp you want to infiltrate, and have one sabotage the match by bringing in a squad. Then do it again. And again. After a while, they'll feel incredibly stupid for not vetting their members, for not realising that it will happen again and again unless they take measures to stop it. It's 80mil lost per match, for no loss on the opposing team. That's a lot more demoralising than being able to put up a fight, and losing 80mil per match for at least some clones on the opposing team. |
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3095
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 14:48:00 -
[71] - Quote
Deluxe Edition wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:This recent wave of "spies" isn't a high-level example of what the metagame can (and will) turn into.
It's a starting point for a sabotage Corp to get their name into the public eye as "the ones who did it first". And they didn't do a great job, so this fuss will die down soon enough, but they've shown people who didn't see it coming (poor fools) what to expect in future, and opened the doors for others to do it right.
I, for one, am looking forward to seeing where this goes. Whole reason why I linked a few propaganda posters too. lol @ didn't see it coming... their have been posts for months about it. Everyone knew this would be abused at some point. I'm in PC to fight tough matches. Not sit in the enemy MCC and cook grenades on myself to take planets. Just because there have been posts about it for months, doesn't mean everyone has taken the warnings seriously, or even that everyone's been active enough on the forums to see those comments. There have been Corps taken by surprise, and it's great. |
Deluxe Edition
TeamPlayers EoN.
241
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 14:50:00 -
[72] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:[
Let's say that you infiltrate, spy, manage to build rank and kick everyone out of the corp and steal ISK. All that you've done is set them back a little. Some people may leave the corp but the people that helped build the corp, the core members will stay and/or rebuild. You can steal all of their ISK but they will just start over and get back to where they were. Meanwhile, you are getting some likes on the forums for outing them.
Scenario 2 could be that you infiltrate them and teamkill them or sabotage their battle. Worst case scenario is that they lose that battle or that district. But if they are better than their opponents, they will launch an attack and reclaim the district. You can always bounce back from an infiltration.
But you want to know what is more damaging than that? Corp A and Corp B talking smack to each other so then they decide to battle it out finally. Corp A beats B...B wants revenge so they battle again and Corp A smacks them again. And a third and 4th time. After awhile, Corp B is going to realize that they are just embarassing themselves because they can not defeat Corp A and they will just stop their campaign. Corp B is now demoralized.
Scenario 2- The corp with the spy can infinitly use the spy to infiltrate ALL of the matches. When you use this tactic the spy is not revealed as all they have to do is DC themselves after they deploy the rogue team. Meaning no matter how good Corp A is as long as the spy is there they will never beat corp B. The only option Corp A has is to kick all of their members and have them all join a holding corp. Which in many corps you are talking about a task involving 300+ members. |
The Robot Devil
BetaMax. CRONOS.
259
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 07:46:00 -
[73] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:This recent wave of "spies" isn't a high-level example of what the metagame can (and will) turn into.
It's a starting point for a sabotage Corp to get their name into the public eye as "the ones who did it first". And they didn't do a great job, so this fuss will die down soon enough, but they've shown people who didn't see it coming (poor fools) what to expect in future, and opened the doors for others to do it right.
I, for one, am looking forward to seeing where this goes.
Yeah this is not deep spying or even good espionage, it is however the way the meta game starts and I bet lots of corporate policies on recruiting and battle plans have been changed to help protect against these types of tactics. It is good we got it out of the way in the first couple of weeks. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |