Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
225
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Pretty simple answer:
make it .50 cents to 1.00 in aurum for respec. then let em respec themselves to death.
problem solved.
Peace B |
LongLostLust
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
14
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
I would make it at least $5 or 10000 AUR. 1/4 of the Merc Pack AUR |
Guinevere Bravo
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
184
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
No bad idea.
I dont want people just spending money to spec into the FOTM (Flavour/fit you choose).
Makes the whole point of 'Your actions have consquences' go to waste. |
boba's fetta
Thukker Tribe Holdings Inc. Gathering Of Nomadic Explorers
71
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
i agree no resets. unless the skills are heavily reworked. |
LongLostLust
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
14
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
Guinevere Bravo wrote:No bad idea.
I dont want people just spending money to spec into the FOTM (Flavour/fit you choose).
Makes the whole point of 'Your actions have consquences' go to waste.
This is a game. Screw the whole "Your actions have consequences" arguement. That is for the real world not a fictional one being played for ENJOYMENT. Who cares if someone wants to spend cash to respec? What if they are bored? What's it to you?
|
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2112
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
1 reset, each year, just like EvE's attribute remap. Free or AUR, who really cares... |
Malkai Inos
The Vanguardians Orion Empire
63
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
LongLostLust wrote:Guinevere Bravo wrote:No bad idea.
I dont want people just spending money to spec into the FOTM (Flavour/fit you choose).
Makes the whole point of 'Your actions have consquences' go to waste. This is a game. Screw the whole "Your actions have consequences" arguement. That is for the real world not a fictional one being played for ENJOYMENT. Who cares if someone wants to spend cash to respec? What if they are bored? What's it to you? That part brings enjoyment for a portion of the playerbase, and i for one DO care if the skillsystem becomes obsolete because some people take issue with a designated core aspect of the game. Your views and opinions on that matter are as subjective as everyone else's. Please try not to reject the other side of the debate just because you feel like it,
|
Chinduko
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
60
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 17:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:LongLostLust wrote:Guinevere Bravo wrote:No bad idea.
I dont want people just spending money to spec into the FOTM (Flavour/fit you choose).
Makes the whole point of 'Your actions have consquences' go to waste. This is a game. Screw the whole "Your actions have consequences" arguement. That is for the real world not a fictional one being played for ENJOYMENT. Who cares if someone wants to spend cash to respec? What if they are bored? What's it to you? That part brings enjoyment for a portion of the playerbase, and i for one DO care if the skillsystem becomes obsolete because some people take issue with a designated core aspect of the game. Your views and opinions on that matter are as subjective as everyone else's. Please try not to reject the other side of the debate just because you feel like it,
When players get bored of the same role, they'll eventually just quit. Then, you'll have less than a handful of players left. If a player doesn't want to respect, they don't have to. If a player does want to respect, they should have that choice. I wouldn't presume to be that selfish and deny another the ability to respect and try something new so they can keep the game fresh simply because I'm afraid they'd become OP. It sounds like a of players are simply afraid of others. Reject a readily available respec if you're afraid of others.
The "you're actions have consequences" statement from the Dust video are not about the positives and negatives of a respec, they were about how one person can change the EVE universe based on the decisions they make. |
Chinduko
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
60
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 17:42:00 -
[9] - Quote
LongLostLust wrote:I would make it at least $5 or 10000 AUR. 1/4 of the Merc Pack AUR
I would make the charge of respecs proportional to the number of total SP a player has earned. the more SP you have the more you'd have to pay.
|
Vexen Krios
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 17:44:00 -
[10] - Quote
if you wanna try a new weapon, especially with everyone already using proto gear and weapons, your going to have to have a respec, unless of course you save all your SP for like a month or two and go straight to proficiency 5 with it. otherwise youll be using a weak weapon in a game full of proto guns. Which is currently what im dealing with lol |
|
Jin Robot
Polar Gooks
435
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 17:44:00 -
[11] - Quote
NO FURTHER RESPECS. Who wants to bet CCP agrees with me? Anyone? |
The Robot Devil
BetaMax. CRONOS.
229
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 17:47:00 -
[12] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:1 reset, each year, just like EvE's attribute remap. Free or AUR, who really cares...
Attribute reallocation not sp repec. |
The Robot Devil
BetaMax. CRONOS.
229
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 17:49:00 -
[13] - Quote
No more respecs. I really hope this is the last one. |
Malkai Inos
The Vanguardians Orion Empire
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:04:00 -
[14] - Quote
Chinduko wrote: When players get bored of the same role, they'll eventually just quit. Then, you'll have less than a handful of players left. If a player doesn't want to respect, they don't have to. If a player does want to respect, they should have that choice. I wouldn't presume to be that selfish and deny another the ability to respect and try something new so they can keep the game fresh simply because I'm afraid they'd become OP. It sounds like a of players are simply afraid of others. Reject a readily available respec if you're afraid of others.
The "you're actions have consequences" statement from the Dust video are not about the positives and negatives of a respec, they were about how one person can change the EVE universe based on the decisions they make.
While in a more eloquent manner, you did the same thing i criticized the other poster for. Don't assume that everyone gets bored and automatically develops the need for a respec just because you can understand this notion. Don't assume that only a handfull of players embraces a "no respec" policy because you disagree with them. There are many minds here and not all of them are shaped like yours.
You imply that argueing against "free" (in terms of no extreme conditions required) respecs is "selfish". Maybe it is. But did you think about those who specifically like that aspect of the game? Aren't the promoters of "free" respecs the ones who want to change an important aspect of the game in a way that nullifies its sole purpose. How is the term "selfish" helpfull here?
Everyone can try everything for no/a pretty minor cost in SP. Use militia or put a single skill in whatever you want to try. By the time you're accostumed to it you'll have enough SP to improve on it. I did it numerous times and the few percent in effectiveness rarely make a noticeable impact.
Lastly what are you even trying to achieve with the OP argument? Some posters point out and object known consequences of "free" respecs. Calling it "fear" is a strawman until you prove that's the prime motivation, not just insinuate it. And even then it does nothing to the argument itself. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1524
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:07:00 -
[15] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:Pretty simple answer:
make it .50 cents to 1.00 in aurum for respec. then let em respec themselves to death.
problem solved.
Peace B Please continue to suggest ways to implement new and exciting pay-to-win content. Please. |
Chinduko
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
62
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:07:00 -
[16] - Quote
Since some people don't want respecs, I hope CCP changes their minds and doesn't offer the respec they mentioned to occur soon, no matter what. If people don't want others to be able to respec then no one should ever be able too, no matter if it's a mistake from CCP or if a player put skills into a useless weapon or suit not realizing it couldn't compete in the game.
Give players that want no respecs what they want, no respecs, including the upcoming.
I think they should just reset all the players. I would be fine with everyone getting a full reset. We won't have to worry about respecs for a while then. |
Malkai Inos
The Vanguardians Orion Empire
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:10:00 -
[17] - Quote
Chinduko wrote:Since some people don't want respecs, I hope CCP changes their minds and doesn't offer the respec they mentioned to occur soon, no matter what. If people don't want others to be able to respec then no one should ever be able too, no matter if it's a mistake from CCP or if a player put skills into a useless weapon or suit not realizing it couldn't compete in the game.
Give players that want no respecs what they want, no respecs, including the upcoming.
I think they should just reset all the players. I would be fine with everyone getting a full reset. We won't have to worry about respecs for a while then. Nice direction we're going here. Have you had a chance to take a look at my rebuttal or is the above all you can bring to this discussion? |
The Robot Devil
BetaMax. CRONOS.
229
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:12:00 -
[18] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:Pretty simple answer:
make it .50 cents to 1.00 in aurum for respec. then let em respec themselves to death.
problem solved.
Peace B Please continue to suggest ways to implement new and exciting pay-to-win content. Please.
That is pay to win. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1525
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:16:00 -
[19] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:Pretty simple answer:
make it .50 cents to 1.00 in aurum for respec. then let em respec themselves to death.
problem solved.
Peace B Please continue to suggest ways to implement new and exciting pay-to-win content. Please. That is pay to win. ^ |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
102
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:29:00 -
[20] - Quote
Its BASSMENT. Doubt he's into the whole pay to win. One can say Boosters is "pay to win" Don't let me open that can of worms. But to string words together is still not explaining the negative of having optional respec. All it is and all I hear is "cause thats not the "core" of EVE... um dust." RIIIIIGHT... This place is divided as to what "Core" this game should have. So before any mmo grinding loving fanboys jump and speak for everyone, REMEMBER there are FPS Fan boys on here too. |
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2988
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:30:00 -
[21] - Quote
LongLostLust wrote:Guinevere Bravo wrote:No bad idea.
I dont want people just spending money to spec into the FOTM (Flavour/fit you choose).
Makes the whole point of 'Your actions have consquences' go to waste. This is a game. Screw the whole "Your actions have consequences" arguement. That is for the real world not a fictional one being played for ENJOYMENT. Who cares if someone wants to spend cash to respec? What if they are bored? What's it to you? The "your actions have consequences" argument is one of the main reasons why some of us are here. If you didn't want to sign up for a world where your decisions matter, you should have done more research on what New Eden is about.
Screw the whole "make it like all the other games" argument. |
Malkai Inos
The Vanguardians Orion Empire
66
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:35:00 -
[22] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:Its BASSMENT. Doubt he's into the whole pay to win. One can say Boosters is "pay to win" Don't let me open that can of worms. But to string words together is still not explaining the negative of having optional respec. All it is and all I hear is "cause thats not the "core" of EVE... um dust." RIIIIIGHT... This place is divided as to what "Core" this game should have. So before any mmo grinding loving fanboys jump and speak for everyone, REMEMBER there are FPS Fan boys on here too. Let me see if i got this right, you're saying:
A: The other side has no argument, period. B: The other side fails to consider both sides of the argument.
Hmm, sounds legit. |
Chinduko
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
63
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:39:00 -
[23] - Quote
|
Chinduko
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
63
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:41:00 -
[24] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Chinduko wrote: When players get bored of the same role, they'll eventually just quit. Then, you'll have less than a handful of players left. If a player doesn't want to respect, they don't have to. If a player does want to respect, they should have that choice. I wouldn't presume to be that selfish and deny another the ability to respect and try something new so they can keep the game fresh simply because I'm afraid they'd become OP. It sounds like a of players are simply afraid of others. Reject a readily available respec if you're afraid of others.
The "you're actions have consequences" statement from the Dust video are not about the positives and negatives of a respec, they were about how one person can change the EVE universe based on the decisions they make.
While in a more eloquent manner, you did the same thing i criticized the other poster for. Don't assume that everyone gets bored and automatically develops the need for a respec just because you can understand this notion. Don't assume that only a handfull of players embraces a "no respec" policy because you disagree with them. There are many minds here and not all of them are shaped like yours. You imply that argueing against "free" (in terms of no extreme conditions required) respecs is "selfish". Maybe it is. But did you think about those who specifically like that aspect of the game? Aren't the promoters of "free" respecs the ones who want to change an important aspect of the game in a way that nullifies its sole purpose. How is the term "selfish" helpfull here? Everyone can try everything for no/a pretty minor cost in SP. Use militia or put a single skill in whatever you want to try. By the time you're accostumed to it you'll have enough SP to improve on it. I did it numerous times and the few percent in effectiveness rarely make a noticeable impact. Lastly what are you even trying to achieve with the OP argument? Some posters point out and object known consequences of "free" respecs. Calling it "fear" is a strawman until you prove that's the prime motivation, not just insinuate it. And even then it does nothing to the argument itself.
Spending aurum for a respec is not "free" as you so put it. And, extreme is a subjective term. For some people, spending aurum is extreme. The important aspects of the game are also highly opinionated. Important aspects of the game change for players. For some of us the most important aspect is being able to fill a role and change that role when the team needs. For some the important aspects are different. Allowing respecs give both sides the opportunity to play as they choose. I'd choose to allow them to make their own decision. Respec if you want to change roles, don't respec if you are content with your skill allocation.
The statement of "flavor of the month" which is an argument common to respec threads be it a change in suits or equipment is an implication of fear as that is directly pointing to something that could be OP. This is fear of the possibility of a once not OP player becoming OP which leads to the possibility of a multitude of players becoming OP. Players will always find ways of being OP, respecs or not. To not mention OP is to ignore others' concerns.
Your assumption that I assume everybody gets bored is incorrect. My original statement was "when players get bored" not "all players get bored." There is a definite difference between those statements. Semantic arguments aren't important, however but since you misinterpreted my statement, I must clarify. Some players will get bored and they will quit. By stating that a handful remain is implies that not all players will bet bored and quit. I use "handful" as Dust has a small player base as it stands. I hope I didn't miss anything. I tried to touch on all your aforementioned concerns about respecs. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
227
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:51:00 -
[25] - Quote
1. the "consequences" issue is moot. no FF = no consequences. don't lean on that. you'll tip. you want consequences? ditch the redline... add v2k... turn on FF for ALL modes... etc. this isn't about that. and consequences ain't gonna happen. ok ill give ya this, but in the meta: first PC where the orbital takes out 2 enemies and 6 friendlies... THEN you guys will get your consequences. the end result... a lotta bichin up and quittin the clan.
2. CCP needs to make money. many people seem to be incompetent at simple math and basic reading. add the 2 together. 50 cents to a buck per respec should get them a couple grand a week based on laziness alone.
3. i have never spent a dime. it's not pay to win. that's all excuses, too. life isn't fair. ruck up and deal or move on. or stay quiet and just grind til you are the same imbalanced protoad you are being beaten up by.
if the devs are gonna fix these ***** salad sandwich, they need income. only real income i see right now is dollars for respecs.
sorry if that bunches up some folks but you gotta do something here. 5k players ain't gonna cut it.
and flavor of the month? all you guys DO is make stupid memes that folks forget 2 weeks later. the whole damn game is flavor of the month til GTAV comes out and everyone bails anyway. CCP may as well make a buck-three-eighty or so over the summer. might keep the devs devving a lil longer. might help the game unsuck.
and i'm not askin for me. i'm not respeccing.
Peace B |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1528
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:52:00 -
[26] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:1. the "consequences" issue is moot. no FF = no consequences. don't lean on that. you'll tip. you want consequences? ditch the redline... add v2k... turn on FF for ALL modes... etc. this isn't about that. and consequences ain't gonna happen. ok ill give ya this, but in the meta: first PC where the orbital takes out 2 enemies and 6 friendlies... THEN you guys will get your consequences. the end result... a lotta bichin up and quittin the clan.
2. CCP needs to make money. many people seem to be incompetent at simple math and basic reading. add the 2 together. 50 cents to a buck per respec should get them a couple grand a week based on laziness alone.
3. i have never spent a dime. it's not pay to win. that's all excuses, too. life isn't fair. ruck up and deal or move on. or stay quiet and just grind til you are the same imbalanced protoad you are being beaten up by.
if the devs are gonna fix these ***** salad sandwich, they need income. only real income i see right now is dollars for respecs.
sorry if that bunches up some folks but you gotta do something here. 5k players ain't gonna cut it.
and flavor of the month? all you guys DO is make stupid memes that folks forget 2 weeks later. the whole damn game is flavor of the month til GTAV comes out and everyone bails anyway. CCP may as well make a buck-three-eighty or so over the summer. might keep the devs devving a lil longer. might help the game unsuck.
and i'm not askin for me. i'm not respeccing.
Peace B Actually, it's just like you said. Life isn't fair. Ruck up and deal with it.
Pretty concise. Take your mis-allocated SP as a learning experience and move on. |
Chinduko
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 19:00:00 -
[27] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:1. the "consequences" issue is moot. no FF = no consequences. don't lean on that. you'll tip. you want consequences? ditch the redline... add v2k... turn on FF for ALL modes... etc. this isn't about that. and consequences ain't gonna happen. ok ill give ya this, but in the meta: first PC where the orbital takes out 2 enemies and 6 friendlies... THEN you guys will get your consequences. the end result... a lotta bichin up and quittin the clan.
2. CCP needs to make money. many people seem to be incompetent at simple math and basic reading. add the 2 together. 50 cents to a buck per respec should get them a couple grand a week based on laziness alone.
3. i have never spent a dime. it's not pay to win. that's all excuses, too. life isn't fair. ruck up and deal or move on. or stay quiet and just grind til you are the same imbalanced protoad you are being beaten up by.
if the devs are gonna fix these ***** salad sandwich, they need income. only real income i see right now is dollars for respecs.
sorry if that bunches up some folks but you gotta do something here. 5k players ain't gonna cut it.
and flavor of the month? all you guys DO is make stupid memes that folks forget 2 weeks later. the whole damn game is flavor of the month til GTAV comes out and everyone bails anyway. CCP may as well make a buck-three-eighty or so over the summer. might keep the devs devving a lil longer. might help the game unsuck.
and i'm not askin for me. i'm not respeccing.
Peace B Actually, it's just like you said. Life isn't fair. Ruck up and deal with it. Pretty concise. Take your mis-allocated SP as a learning experience and move on.
He mentioned that he will deal, he'll be having a blast on GTAV while the few players that remain to play Dust wonder why the player base gets smaller than it is now.
He's right, if CCP can't make money which respecs could potentially make money, there goes your new updates out the door. CCP will simply spend their time with EVE giving Dust less and less.
I don't know that CCP will allow respecs but it's their decision, all we can do is show them that the benefits (money made) to allowing it do outweigh the costs (players complaining just as they always do but still won't stop playing Dust). |
Malkai Inos
The Vanguardians Orion Empire
66
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 19:56:00 -
[28] - Quote
Chinduko wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:Chinduko wrote: When players get bored of the same role, they'll eventually just quit. Then, you'll have less than a handful of players left. If a player doesn't want to respect, they don't have to. If a player does want to respect, they should have that choice. I wouldn't presume to be that selfish and deny another the ability to respect and try something new so they can keep the game fresh simply because I'm afraid they'd become OP. It sounds like a of players are simply afraid of others. Reject a readily available respec if you're afraid of others.
The "you're actions have consequences" statement from the Dust video are not about the positives and negatives of a respec, they were about how one person can change the EVE universe based on the decisions they make.
While in a more eloquent manner, you did the same thing i criticized the other poster for. Don't assume that everyone gets bored and automatically develops the need for a respec just because you can understand this notion. Don't assume that only a handfull of players embraces a "no respec" policy because you disagree with them. There are many minds here and not all of them are shaped like yours. You imply that argueing against "free" (in terms of no extreme conditions required) respecs is "selfish". Maybe it is. But did you think about those who specifically like that aspect of the game? Aren't the promoters of "free" respecs the ones who want to change an important aspect of the game in a way that nullifies its sole purpose. How is the term "selfish" helpfull here? Everyone can try everything for no/a pretty minor cost in SP. Use militia or put a single skill in whatever you want to try. By the time you're accostumed to it you'll have enough SP to improve on it. I did it numerous times and the few percent in effectiveness rarely make a noticeable impact. Lastly what are you even trying to achieve with the OP argument? Some posters point out and object known consequences of "free" respecs. Calling it "fear" is a strawman until you prove that's the prime motivation, not just insinuate it. And even then it does nothing to the argument itself. Spending aurum for a respec is not "free" as you so put it. And, extreme is a subjective term. For some people, spending aurum is extreme. The important aspects of the game are also highly opinionated. Important aspects of the game change for players. For some of us the most important aspect is being able to fill a role and change that role when the team needs. For some the important aspects are different. Allowing respecs gives both sides the opportunity to play as they choose. I'd choose to allow them to make their own decision. Respec if you want to change roles, don't respec if you are content with your skill allocation. The statement of "flavor of the month" which is an argument common to respec threads be it a change in suits or equipment is an implication of fear as that is directly pointing to something that could be OP. This is fear of the possibility of a once not OP player becoming OP which leads to the possibility of a multitude of players becoming OP. Players will always find ways of being OP, respecs or not. To not mention the introduction of OP weapons or other equipment is to ignore others' concerns that have mentioned that they're worried others can respec into arguably OP weapons. Your assumption that I assume everybody gets bored is incorrect. My original statement was "when players get bored" not "all players get bored." There is a definite difference between those statements. Semantic arguments aren't important, however but since you misinterpreted my statement, I must clarify. Some players will get bored and they will quit. By stating that a handful remain is implication that not all players will bet bored and quit. I use "handful" as Dust has a small player base as it stands. I hope I didn't miss anything. I tried to touch on all your aforementioned concerns about respecs.
|
BMSTUBBY
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
221
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 20:31:00 -
[29] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote: and flavor of the month? all you guys DO is make stupid memes that folks forget 2 weeks later. the whole damn game is flavor of the month til GTAV comes out and everyone bails anyway. CCP may as well make a buck-three-eighty or so over the summer. might keep the devs devving a lil longer. might help the game unsuck.
The Last of Us releases 14th of June 2013, less than a Month away.
This gives me plenty of time to see if PC is going to make or break this game.
In the past I was against P2respec, but after what CCP has done to Dropships and HAV's I say Fuk it.
$1 for a respec hell yeah.
One other thing P2respec might do for us is to allow us to show CCP how Fuked up this game is fast.
Huuuh??? Imagine if all the Vets started dumping 8-10 million SP into everything that the game has to offer without having to worry if it was broke or not.
We would give CCP a very long and fast list of real sh*t that needs to get fixed wouldn't we.
Again I have changed my stance on P2Respec,
I support this cause. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
234
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 23:19:00 -
[30] - Quote
just a heads up:
seen enough of TLoU to know it's on rails... so i'll go ahead and say yawn right now.
this game has the summer to grab folks by the balls. after that the momentum stalls. then the ps4 comes out and folks are gonna go into a tizzy.
not to mention xbox. which we haven't mentioned but ALSO has class 3 and class 6 (i think?) coming as exclusives.the first is a SP leading into a MMO which is the second.
and xbox may be the first to go screenless which is gonna chopblock sony unless they have their VR goggles on deck.
EvE is already dipping into the VR pool beause they know that Star Citizen is breathing down their neck. big time.
the key to the P2Re idea is:
they need to unload some mega gear. i mean totally thow everything AND the kitchen sink in with the announcement that
"we are going to imbalance the game by giving you mechs, tanks, air vehicles, etc. basically everything you want or could possibly use thereby nullifying any imbalance because there is so much gear, it's gonna take a long time to shake out and you'll be too busy respeccing daily to whine about anything."
i would personally suggest calling this the "AR$ENAL" patch.
give out more gear then anyone can possibly test and for the rest of the summer it should be a friggin slot machine for CCP.
Peace B |
|
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1531
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 23:21:00 -
[31] - Quote
LongLostLust wrote:Guinevere Bravo wrote:No bad idea.
I dont want people just spending money to spec into the FOTM (Flavour/fit you choose).
Makes the whole point of 'Your actions have consquences' go to waste. This is a game. Screw the whole "Your actions have consequences" arguement. That is for the real world not a fictional one being played for ENJOYMENT. Who cares if someone wants to spend cash to respec? What if they are bored? What's it to you?
No, CCP should focus on making actions sticky (with long lasting consequences) in an enjoyable manner. Not give up on the one thing that is truly unique about DUST. |
Darken-Sol
BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate
82
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 02:56:00 -
[32] - Quote
The respecs should be free and unrestricted. We should have an ingame mechanic for it so CCP would not have to deal with it at all. Upon respec SP would be refunded except corp related SP. No skill book refund would take place. Frequent respecers would go broke.
I believe this alone would resolve the problem. It would also add playability to the game by spicing things up. A merc could have 15 mil SP but with no ISK to buy books it would feel like leveling up. Every few battles they could purchase skills, weapons, and suits. This would make the sluglike player progression [u]feel[/] like you are getting somewhere.....everyday. Meanwhile they would be leveling up for real. Every one could try things and find out what they like. After spending weeks without all of their SP they would understand the skills and the value of said skills. Plus they may like what they spec into.
The initial respec should, however, include a full refund on skill books. The way people skilled into things was based on game play from Chromosome. Uprising was a slap in the face to anyone who thought non AR weapons were still viable. Weapons and vehicles used the day before were extremely different, as was game play. Tons of mercs felt cheated. I think everyone learned something.
|
Frontline Medic
On-Sight-Response
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 02:59:00 -
[33] - Quote
Guinevere Bravo wrote:No bad idea.
I dont want people just spending money to spec into the FOTM (Flavour/fit you choose).
Makes the whole point of 'Your actions have consquences' go to waste. this. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
236
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 03:28:00 -
[34] - Quote
"The respecs should be free and unrestricted"
no. they should not.
the game is free.
your mistakes cost you.
pay the man.
Peace B |
The Goram Batman
Forgotten Militia
29
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 03:42:00 -
[35] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:The Robot Devil wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:Pretty simple answer:
make it .50 cents to 1.00 in aurum for respec. then let em respec themselves to death.
problem solved.
Peace B Please continue to suggest ways to implement new and exciting pay-to-win content. Please. That is pay to win. ^ Please explain to me how that is pay to win.
Paying for a respec isn't pay to win, you're not exactly earning anything from respeccing. You're not earning any more SP or gear from doing so, nor are you gaining a significant upper hand over others.
Personally, I'm not that big on respecs in DUST/EVE, but with the coming of Uprising and the handful of botched skills CCP released I can see the reason to allow some respecs until CCP gets the skills and everything locked down. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3012
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 03:45:00 -
[36] - Quote
The Goram Batman wrote:Please explain to me how that is pay to win.
Paying for a respec isn't pay to win, you're not exactly earning anything from respeccing. You're not earning any more SP or gear from doing so, nor are you gaining a significant upper hand over others.
Personally, I'm not that big on respecs in DUST/EVE, but with the coming of Uprising and the handful of botched skills CCP released I can see the reason to allow some respecs until CCP gets the skills and everything locked down. 1. CCP "rebalance" things. 2. A particular weapon shows itself to be the new "OP". 3. Everyone with money to burn flocks to the AUR respec and skills into that weapon.
Guess what the non-paying players do? |
Darken-Sol
BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate
82
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 03:49:00 -
[37] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:"The respecs should be free and unrestricted"
no. they should not.
the game is free.
your mistakes cost you.
pay the man.
Peace B
Did You bother to read further? Consequences that teach you to be a better player. As it stands CCP makes no money off of people who just quit. There are alot of douche bags on the forums saying "quit if you do not like it". How is that good for anyone?
All I hear is" i already have my tac AR, lets keep the killing easy". |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
2303
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 03:55:00 -
[38] - Quote
*sigh*
Why are we still talking about this?
I know CCP can make money off of this, but this idea has been talked about for at least since PLEX was introduced in Eve and even then the majority of the player base didn't want it.
No, I don't want it. It doesn't belong in DUST. It screams pay-to-win. |
Darken-Sol
BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate
82
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 04:46:00 -
[39] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:*sigh*
Why are we still talking about this?
I know CCP can make money off of this, but this idea has been talked about for at least since PLEX was introduced in Eve and even then the majority of the player base didn't want it.
No, I don't want it. It doesn't belong in DUST. It screams pay-to-win.
Not if it is free. How is this pay to win?
The respecs should be free and unrestricted. We should have an ingame mechanic for it so CCP would not have to deal with it at all. Upon respec SP would be refunded except corp related SP. No skill book refund would take place. Frequent respecers would go broke.
I believe this alone would resolve the problem. It would also add playability to the game by spicing things up. A merc could have 15 mil SP but with no ISK to buy books it would feel like leveling up. Every few battles they could purchase skills, weapons, and suits. This would make the sluglike player progression feel like you are getting somewhere.....everyday. Meanwhile they would be leveling up for real. Every one could try things and find out what they like. After spending weeks without all of their SP they would understand the skills and the value of said skills. Plus they may like what they spec into.
The initial respec should, however, include a full refund on skill books. The way people skilled into things was based on game play from Chromosome. Uprising was a slap in the face to anyone who thought non AR weapons were still viable. Weapons and vehicles used the day before were extremely different, as was game play. Tons of mercs felt cheated. I think everyone learned something.
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
2304
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 05:05:00 -
[40] - Quote
It doesn't matter either way if it charges people or are handed out free as candy. I will not support respecs of such nature as you describe it. I will always be against anything that undermines the concept of meaningful choices established by permanent consequences. If you don't like living with your mistakes on how you laid out your SP, then too frakking bad. Live with it.
Still don't agree? I don't care. |
|
Darken-Sol
BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate
82
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 05:13:00 -
[41] - Quote
If u dont care, why bother posting? let me guess, you are female |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
2305
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 05:17:00 -
[42] - Quote
Darken-Sol wrote:If u dont care, why bother posting? let me guess, you are female
I'm not a girl. Even then, what does that have to do with this discussion? Is that the best rebuttal you can come up with? |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
2305
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 05:18:00 -
[43] - Quote
I'm done with this thread. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3019
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 05:22:00 -
[44] - Quote
Darken-Sol wrote:If u dont care, why bother posting? let me guess, you are female Same reason I'm posting the same point Maken makes.
We care about the game staying true to one of the reasons why we're playing it.
We don't care if you like it or not.
"I don't care about you" and "I don't care about this topic" are very different points to be making. And neither one should be seen as a reason to bring up sexist stereotypes and use "female" as a derogatory term. |
Darken-Sol
BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate
82
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 05:24:00 -
[45] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Darken-Sol wrote:If u dont care, why bother posting? let me guess, you are female I'm not a girl. Even then, what does that have to do with this discussion? Is that the best rebuttal you can come up with?
It's not a rebuttal, merely an observation. Maybe you dont know many women. When they say they dont care they usually do....... and write a paragraph about it, before saying "i dont care" |
KalOfTheRathi
Talon Strike Force LTD Orion Empire
454
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 05:29:00 -
[46] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:make it .50 cents to 1.00 in aurum for respec. then let em respec themselves to death. You are thinking of Borderlands. DUST is not that game.
While in Borderlands(1 & 2) a cheap respec will allow one to tweak the hell out of your setup for a particular boss battle or to fight some specific enemies that is not consistent with New Eden, EVE nor current DUST setups.
You would have equipment in your inventory that you could not use. You could switch the 6M SP required for tanks to Logi Bro. Or switch the 4M Logi Bro SP to buff you your tank skills for a PC/FW battle.
Also consider that the entire system would have to be reworked. Now recall how the user experience has degraded from Chromosome to Uprising. What are the chances of it working out ... for the players?
The problem is solved only if you don't actually consider the consequences, the amount of effort to implement it nor the long term effects on game play. This is the normal easy solution that the web produces every minute of everyday regarding virtually any problem.
Nice try but a solid whoosh. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
271
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 05:34:00 -
[47] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:make it .50 cents to 1.00 in aurum for respec. then let em respec themselves to death. You are thinking of Borderlands. DUST is not that game. While in Borderlands(1 & 2) a cheap respec will allow one to tweak the hell out of your setup for a particular boss battle or to fight some specific enemies that is not consistent with New Eden, EVE nor current DUST setups. You would have equipment in your inventory that you could not use. You could switch the 6M SP required for tanks to Logi Bro. Or switch the 4M Logi Bro SP to buff you your tank skills for a PC/FW battle. Also consider that the entire system would have to be reworked. Now recall how the user experience has degraded from Chromosome to Uprising. What are the chances of it working out ... for the players? The problem is solved only if you don't actually consider the consequences, the amount of effort to implement it nor the long term effects on game play. This is the normal easy solution that the web produces every minute of everyday regarding virtually any problem. Nice try but a solid whoosh.
Quoted For Truth.
Honestly, I'm surprised and grateful they're giving out the optional one. would need a friggin' month to spec out of my squishy squishy min scouts to a nice beefy gally logi with the ability to actually carry a decent amount of equipment(seriously, why did they jack all the equipment slots from all the other classes!?) |
The Robot Devil
BetaMax. CRONOS.
240
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 08:31:00 -
[48] - Quote
We love and respect our fps fan boys and their opinions. Respecs hurt the game because anyone at anytime can change their roles and respec into the new weapon or suit that is the perceived "Win Button" and caused more QQ and then causes the nerf/buff cycle. This is a fps and a RPG rolled up into one game and name of the game is you have a choice to make and if it is good or bad you have to live with it. We want a hardcore shooter that takes time and skill to develop into an effective merc and giving people the option to waffle and completely change because some other item is a tiny bit better or they don't like what they have is detrimental to the premise of the game. There should only be respects for skills removed or a complete misrepresentation of the skill. We all knew new gear was coming and we shouldn't hand out candy to babies because of their failure to read or their unhappiness with the choices they made.
I give exceptions to the current respec because the launch did not have all the basic gear and suits but after that there should be no repecs for anything except the removal of skills that the merc was skilled into or the skill is broken/described poorly. Then only the spent SP in the those broken or repealed skills should be refunded, not all of the SP. |
The Robot Devil
BetaMax. CRONOS.
240
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 08:43:00 -
[49] - Quote
Darken-Sol wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:*sigh*
Why are we still talking about this?
I know CCP can make money off of this, but this idea has been talked about for at least since PLEX was introduced in Eve and even then the majority of the player base didn't want it.
No, I don't want it. It doesn't belong in DUST. It screams pay-to-win. Not if it is free. How is this pay to win? The respecs should be free and unrestricted. We should have an ingame mechanic for it so CCP would not have to deal with it at all. Upon respec SP would be refunded except corp related SP. No skill book refund would take place. Frequent respecers would go broke. I believe this alone would resolve the problem. It would also add playability to the game by spicing things up. A merc could have 15 mil SP but with no ISK to buy books it would feel like leveling up. Every few battles they could purchase skills, weapons, and suits. This would make the sluglike player progression feel like you are getting somewhere.....everyday. Meanwhile they would be leveling up for real. Every one could try things and find out what they like. After spending weeks without all of their SP they would understand the skills and the value of said skills. Plus they may like what they spec into. The initial respec should, however, include a full refund on skill books. The way people skilled into things was based on game play from Chromosome. Uprising was a slap in the face to anyone who thought non AR weapons were still viable. Weapons and vehicles used the day before were extremely different, as was game play. Tons of mercs felt cheated. I think everyone learned something.
I wrong clicked one time and lost 250k SP other than that I got what I wanted. When balance finally hits the weapons the douches who picked the I win button because it is a win button will be screwed and that's the way it should be. I spent 3 days skilling into a level 3 skill on EvE to find out it did not do what I thought or wanted. Am I crying for a refund? No, because I understand that it was my choice and I made it wrong. I had to search the forums and I found one post by CCP Fozzie that gave me my bad news. Three days wasted. New Eden is a bit** and you have to decide if you are going to f*** her or if she is going to f*** you. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
956
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 08:46:00 -
[50] - Quote
This isn't pay to win, it's pay to element the concept that whatever choices you make, you have to live with them. Once the skill tree situation is taken care of, I hope we never, ever see another respec again for the sake of preserving that value. |
|
Synfulwrath
Requiem of Shadows deadspace society
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 08:53:00 -
[51] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:The Goram Batman wrote:Please explain to me how that is pay to win.
Paying for a respec isn't pay to win, you're not exactly earning anything from respeccing. You're not earning any more SP or gear from doing so, nor are you gaining a significant upper hand over others.
Personally, I'm not that big on respecs in DUST/EVE, but with the coming of Uprising and the handful of botched skills CCP released I can see the reason to allow some respecs until CCP gets the skills and everything locked down. 1. CCP "rebalance" things. 2. A particular weapon shows itself to be the new "OP". 3. Everyone with money to burn flocks to the AUR respec and skills into that weapon. Guess what the non-paying players do?
So now its the players faut that imbalances in weapons create FOTMs? So what are you really upset about? That you dont want to respec into something "OP" but that others do? That those others are getting an edge over you because they payed real money to respec to a "broken imbalanced" weapon? Or is it really that you dont want to pay real money to respec? and if the respec were free what then? whats the issue now? There is no gaining of SP of any sorts that anyone has proposed. rather they are reassigning the SP. So whats the real issue hmm? Because there will be people that already specced into that weapon or vehicle, etc. So they get rewarded because of this? no gripes there? it seems like the bigger issue is the imbalance in weapons and game mechanics that allow people to get ahead of others.
and for people throwing this around...
Quote:Your actions have consequence
where oh please WHERE does that ever say its for character creation? because its not. It has to do with our (the players) ability to shape the world of New Eden. Not that you should be punished or rewarded by your allocation of SP.
The Butterfly Effect
in a nutshell, you play a pub, do well, get accepted into a corp thats part of alliance thats doing PC. you take over planets and help out your eve allies to gain a stronger foothold or to help your faction militia conquer systems, and all of this because of the people you met in your pub games. Please stop using this phrase incorrectly.
|
Talruum Tezztarozza
Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS.
121
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 09:00:00 -
[52] - Quote
If CCP ever agree to this (which I doubt they will), I suspect the price would range around 50$ or 100$+ (Yes they really don't want player to make it lightly) |
The Robot Devil
BetaMax. CRONOS.
240
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 09:01:00 -
[53] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:This isn't pay to win, it's pay to element the concept that whatever choices you make, you have to live with them. Once the skill tree situation is taken care of, I hope we never, ever see another respec again for the sake of preserving that value. +200 |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3035
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 09:09:00 -
[54] - Quote
Synfulwrath wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:The Goram Batman wrote:Please explain to me how that is pay to win.
Paying for a respec isn't pay to win, you're not exactly earning anything from respeccing. You're not earning any more SP or gear from doing so, nor are you gaining a significant upper hand over others.
Personally, I'm not that big on respecs in DUST/EVE, but with the coming of Uprising and the handful of botched skills CCP released I can see the reason to allow some respecs until CCP gets the skills and everything locked down. 1. CCP "rebalance" things. 2. A particular weapon shows itself to be the new "OP". 3. Everyone with money to burn flocks to the AUR respec and skills into that weapon. Guess what the non-paying players do? So now its the players faut that imbalances in weapons create FOTMs? So what are you really upset about? That you dont want to respec into something "OP" but that others do? That those others are getting an edge over you because they payed real money to respec to a "broken imbalanced" weapon? Or is it really that you dont want to pay real money to respec? and if the respec were free what then? whats the issue now? There is no gaining of SP of any sorts that anyone has proposed. rather they are reassigning the SP. So whats the real issue hmm? Because there will be people that already specced into that weapon or vehicle, etc. So they get rewarded because of this? no gripes there? it seems like the bigger issue is the imbalance in weapons and game mechanics that allow people to get ahead of others. I was answering the question of how AUR respecs would be pay-to-win. It would be pay-to-win because people who spend real money would get a definite, measurable advantage over those who don't.
If there were free respecs, there would be no lasting result from your decision to skill into something, and that goes against a core philosophy of New Eden. That philosophy of lasting consequences for your decisions is a large part of the reason many of us are here, and if it's negated, DUST will no longer be part of New Eden.
Different games work within different universes that have different rules. If they all worked the same way, then gamers wouldn't be as broad a target market. This isn't a game that's built with the mindset of your average CoD player in mind, and it's not meant to be. It wasn't built for people who want to rush around and not have to plan ahead. |
The Robot Devil
BetaMax. CRONOS.
241
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 09:12:00 -
[55] - Quote
Synfulwrath wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:The Goram Batman wrote:Please explain to me how that is pay to win.
Paying for a respec isn't pay to win, you're not exactly earning anything from respeccing. You're not earning any more SP or gear from doing so, nor are you gaining a significant upper hand over others.
Personally, I'm not that big on respecs in DUST/EVE, but with the coming of Uprising and the handful of botched skills CCP released I can see the reason to allow some respecs until CCP gets the skills and everything locked down. 1. CCP "rebalance" things. 2. A particular weapon shows itself to be the new "OP". 3. Everyone with money to burn flocks to the AUR respec and skills into that weapon. Guess what the non-paying players do? So now its the players faut that imbalances in weapons create FOTMs? So what are you really upset about? That you dont want to respec into something "OP" but that others do? That those others are getting an edge over you because they payed real money to respec to a "broken imbalanced" weapon? Or is it really that you dont want to pay real money to respec? and if the respec were free what then? whats the issue now? There is no gaining of SP of any sorts that anyone has proposed. rather they are reassigning the SP. So whats the real issue hmm? Because there will be people that already specced into that weapon or vehicle, etc. So they get rewarded because of this? no gripes there? it seems like the bigger issue is the imbalance in weapons and game mechanics that allow people to get ahead of others. and for people throwing this around... Quote:Your actions have consequence where oh please WHERE does that ever say its for character creation? because its not. It has to do with our (the players) ability to shape the world of New Eden. Not that you should be punished or rewarded by your allocation of SP. The Butterfly Effectin a nutshell, you play a pub, do well, get accepted into a corp thats part of alliance thats doing PC. you take over planets and help out your eve allies to gain a stronger foothold or to help your faction militia conquer systems, and all of this because of the people you met in your pub games. Please stop using this phrase incorrectly. EDIT: I am not AGAINST the respec argument, but im not necessarily for it either. Im just trying to point out what a really complex and in depth skill points system does when weapons are imbalanced, which is the bigger issue. And it seems that others that have made good decisions want the rest of the community to suck it up because if they could do it why cant the rest of them. This is not a good attitude to have.
The problem is imbalance and trying to get an edge over someone by using a broken tool is to be expected but we shouldn't reward people who only want the best current weapon or suit by allowing them to change their entire SP allocation to take advantage of a broken mechanism. If you skilled to the tac rifle because it is op and then they nerf it to bring it in line with other weapons you shouldn't get a respec because a new weapon is perceived to be better. |
ICECREAMK1NG
WARRIORS 1NC
492
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 09:28:00 -
[56] - Quote
Listen to your basement dwelling selves.
This is a friggin GAME, a VIDEO GAME.
It's not real life, your New Eden does not exist, except in your sad little minds.
'' if you make a mistake you have to live with it '' lol.............. STFU.
THIS IS A VIDEO GAME, a bad one, but it's still ONLY A GAME.
I'm sure most of the idiots posting on these forums wear Star Trek outfits while typing away in their basements. dreaming about 7 of Nine, and wondering what it'd be like to talk to a real life girl. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3036
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 09:46:00 -
[57] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG wrote:Listen to your basement dwelling selves.
This is a friggin GAME, a VIDEO GAME.
It's not real life, your New Eden does not exist, except in your sad little minds.
'' if you make a mistake you have to live with it '' lol.............. STFU.
THIS IS A VIDEO GAME, a bad one, but it's still ONLY A GAME.
I'm sure most of the idiots posting on these forums wear Star Trek outfits while typing away in their basements. dreaming about 7 of Nine, and wondering what it'd be like to talk to a real life girl. 1. I live with my girlfriend in an apartment on one of the busiest main roads in my country, on the second floor. Our basement is a garage, and has no bedrooms.
2. New Eden may not be real, but it has consistent rules like any other good setting for a story.
3. If the game is so bad, why are you still here?
4. I don't own any Star Trek outfits, but I do own a pair of Kodachi, a Broadsword, a collection of Bokken, a Hanbo and a Bo staff. You're welcome to track me down, there's enough information on these forums for a smart person to track down the street I live on at the very least. If you decide to come visit, let me know. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
957
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 09:57:00 -
[58] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG wrote:Listen to your basement dwelling selves.
This is a friggin GAME, a VIDEO GAME.
It's not real life, your New Eden does not exist, except in your sad little minds.
'' if you make a mistake you have to live with it '' lol.............. STFU.
THIS IS A VIDEO GAME, a bad one, but it's still ONLY A GAME.
I'm sure most of the idiots posting on these forums wear Star Trek outfits while typing away in their basements. dreaming about 7 of Nine, and wondering what it'd be like to talk to a real life girl. Statements like these are the reason why there's no balance in Dust 514. You play any other game, you play by that game's rules and parameters. You play Dust 514, you have to play by New Eden rules or I'm seriously disgusted by the amount of unwarranted self entitlement that flood these forums. CCP caters to your ilk, and I have no idea why. You're probably going to leave to once CoD: Ghost, BF4, or whatever watered down FPS comes out, right? You may see my views as elitist or down right snobbish, but I don't care. Crying about the rules of New Eden is the equivalent of trying to move backwards with a pawn in chess. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
238
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 09:57:00 -
[59] - Quote
look...
1. i by and large use militia gear. i'm not respeccing. don't need to. winning is not easy. if we play against a real team it's tough, if we play against girl scouts, it's easy. sorry if that bugs ya. we all have access to the same gear, so what the more emotional responses to this thread tells me is that as always, it's not the car, it's the driver. won't matter how much you respec if you suck. you'll still suck, you'll just blame a different kit for it.
2. how the HELL are you guys gonna come at ME about consequences: "where's the V2K?" i ask "wahhhhhhhhhhhhh" i hear. V2K is directly related to consequences. but nope, you guys don't want it. "where's the friendly fire?" says i same thing. wahhhhhhhhhhh "what's this redline doing here? why can't we base rappage?" me asks wahhhhhhhhhh says the masses
we held back and used militia gear while you guys used protoad gear. it took 4 of you grouped up with a tank to take down a homie with a militia rifle. so they took out the range of the weapon. you guys don't want conseqences. you never have. you want ez mode win button. that's why most of you use protoad gear. you have to. if you wanted consequences you'd be playing DayZ or Arma or something tough. this ain't tough. this is cod with shields. it was kinda tough before, but then the consequences of that caused the devs to nerf it for most of ya.
3. CCP has, seriously, about 16 weeks give or take to life this thing up and get it flying. once you hit sept, it's a long fly ball that's probably gonna go foul and disappear into the crowd. this game is working right now for one single reason: there is nothing else to play. logically, if they are the only kids on the block selling lemonade, then CCP better sell as much friggin lemonade as they can for the next 16 weeks or else someone else is coming with a truck load of coke or mountain dew or vodka and lemonade will be a thing of the past. get your money while you can CCP
for that reason: P2Re.
Peace B |
ICECREAMK1NG
WARRIORS 1NC
492
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 10:15:00 -
[60] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:ICECREAMK1NG wrote:Listen to your basement dwelling selves.
This is a friggin GAME, a VIDEO GAME.
It's not real life, your New Eden does not exist, except in your sad little minds.
'' if you make a mistake you have to live with it '' lol.............. STFU.
THIS IS A VIDEO GAME, a bad one, but it's still ONLY A GAME.
I'm sure most of the idiots posting on these forums wear Star Trek outfits while typing away in their basements. dreaming about 7 of Nine, and wondering what it'd be like to talk to a real life girl. Statements like these are the reason why there's no balance in Dust 514. You play any other game, you play by that game's rules and parameters. You play Dust 514, you have to play by New Eden rules or I'm seriously disgusted by the amount of unwarranted self entitlement that flood these forums. CCP caters to your ilk, and I have no idea why. You're probably going to leave to once CoD: Ghost, BF4, or whatever watered down FPS comes out, right? You may see my views as elitist or down right snobbish, but I don't care. Crying about the rules of New Eden is the equivalent of trying to move backwards with a pawn in chess.
Hey, I'm not crying nobby, I'm laughing at you and blacknerd. |
|
DeeJay One
BetaMax. CRONOS.
28
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 10:39:00 -
[61] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:Pretty simple answer:
make it .50 cents to 1.00 in aurum for respec. then let em respec themselves to death.
If ever, then at least 1.00 Aurum for 1 SP back. Other than that it's too cheap. Resetting a clones brain to a previous state takes some costly engineering. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
238
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 10:40:00 -
[62] - Quote
have ya seen some of these players?
resetting something that is empty should take a couple seconds... at most.
Peace B |
Robert Lanate
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 10:41:00 -
[63] - Quote
Isn't Dust same as EVE about "persistence" and accepting consequences of your decisions. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
241
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 14:34:00 -
[64] - Quote
ya know you would think so...
but way way back when the first dev diary told us FF was off, i knew it wasn't gonna go down like that.
we shall see tonight what 514 is about.
t minus ? hours.
Peace B |
BigussDikkuss
Star Poopers of the Orc Nebula
93
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 14:42:00 -
[65] - Quote
LongLostLust wrote:I would make it at least $5 or 10000 AUR. 1/4 of the Merc Pack AUR
The initial post and the above follow-up are actually very good financial suggestions for CCP to substantially increase their revenue stream for this game.
As such, rest assured CCP will most likely NEVER do it. It's a saving face type of thing.
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
2308
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 20:56:00 -
[66] - Quote
BigussDikkuss wrote:LongLostLust wrote:I would make it at least $5 or 10000 AUR. 1/4 of the Merc Pack AUR The initial post and the above follow-up are actually very good financial suggestions for CCP to substantially increase their revenue stream for this game. As such, rest assured CCP will most likely NEVER do it. It's a saving face type of thing.
Exactly. CCP will only do it if they ever get bought out by EA. Keep in mind that CCP waved a big middle finger at EA during the recent fanfest when they made a reference to Earth and Beyond. |
BMSTUBBY
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
229
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 21:02:00 -
[67] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:BigussDikkuss wrote:LongLostLust wrote:I would make it at least $5 or 10000 AUR. 1/4 of the Merc Pack AUR The initial post and the above follow-up are actually very good financial suggestions for CCP to substantially increase their revenue stream for this game. As such, rest assured CCP will most likely NEVER do it. It's a saving face type of thing. Exactly. CCP will only do it if they ever get bought out by EA. Keep in mind that CCP waved a big middle finger at EA during the recent fanfest when they made a reference to Earth and Beyond.
I thought you said that you where done with this thread.
And I quote
Maken Tosch wrote:I'm done with this thread.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=812512#post812512 |
Jin Robot
Polar Gooks
450
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 21:05:00 -
[68] - Quote
BMSTUBBY wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:BigussDikkuss wrote:LongLostLust wrote:I would make it at least $5 or 10000 AUR. 1/4 of the Merc Pack AUR The initial post and the above follow-up are actually very good financial suggestions for CCP to substantially increase their revenue stream for this game. As such, rest assured CCP will most likely NEVER do it. It's a saving face type of thing. Exactly. CCP will only do it if they ever get bought out by EA. Keep in mind that CCP waved a big middle finger at EA during the recent fanfest when they made a reference to Earth and Beyond. I thought you said that you where done with this thread. And I quote Maken Tosch wrote:I'm done with this thread. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=812512#post812512 hehe, how much time you spend pointing this stuff out? oohhh, ya got him |
Waruiko DUST
G I A N T EoN.
100
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 21:08:00 -
[69] - Quote
If you wanted to include respec without breaking SP you could only do something like one skill every 3 months. |
BMSTUBBY
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
229
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 21:11:00 -
[70] - Quote
Jin Robot wrote:hehe, how much time you spend pointing this stuff out? oohhh, ya got him
Same amount of time you spend pointing out that I pointed this stuff out. oohhh, ya I showed him |
|
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
241
|
Posted - 2013.05.17 20:33:00 -
[71] - Quote
$1 a respec sounds about right
.50 cent per month per sub account.
Peace B |
Mr PurpSicle
D3LTA FORC3 Orion Empire
33
|
Posted - 2013.05.17 21:31:00 -
[72] - Quote
If the game were perfectly balanced I would say no re-specs. But it's not. So why not offer it for a price. I'm sure CCP could use the money towards dev costs of balancing. I know this could be viewed as P2W but if the game was actually balanced, it would not be. The option to respec would help show what is unbalanced.
Since I have yet to see a good reason to not allow this, I'm willing to gander that all of those against re-specs are Caldari Proto Logi wearin', Tac AR usin' whores who think that because they did the research to find the unbalanced items in the game that anyone who made the mistake of spec'ing into anything else should have to pay. Oh, they will QQ when the nerf bat strikes! And it will. CCP has a nerf bat the size of a cadilac. Look what happened to LR's. Nerfed into non-existence. They should stop listening to forum QQers.
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
2338
|
Posted - 2013.05.17 21:34:00 -
[73] - Quote
Oh snap, my cover is blown!
Gotta bail out! |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3078
|
Posted - 2013.05.17 22:04:00 -
[74] - Quote
Mr PurpSicle wrote:If the game were perfectly balanced I would say no re-specs. But it's not. So why not offer it for a price. I'm sure CCP could use the money towards dev costs of balancing. I know this could be viewed as P2W but if the game was actually balanced, it would not be. The option to respec would help show what is unbalanced.
Since I have yet to see a good reason to not allow this, I'm willing to gander that all of those against re-specs are Caldari Proto Logi wearin', Tac AR usin' whores who think that because they did the research to find the unbalanced items in the game that anyone who made the mistake of spec'ing into anything else should have to pay. Oh, they will QQ when the nerf bat strikes! And it will. CCP has a nerf bat the size of a cadilac. Look what happened to LR's. Nerfed into non-existence. They should stop listening to forum QQers. Main is a Shotgun Scout with a side-project of skilling into Amarr Logi.
Most-active alt is a tank driver who uses a Sica most of the time.
Paid respecs are against the spirit of New Eden. If CCP offer them in DUST, they'll be forced to offer them in EVE as well. Many long-term players in BOTH games will leave if that happens.
EVE is for profit. DUST is for fun. Killing the spirit of New Eden for something that's barely past being side-project material yet is a bad idea.
You make your decision, you live with it. As long as CCP have given you access to the relevant information to make an informed decision, there should be no option to change your mind. The recent issues with vehicle skills having incorrect descriptions, and certain skills not applying as described is a valid reason to allow a respec. "Because I wanna" and "because moneys!" are definitely NOT valid reasons to allow a respec. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |