Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
120
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 01:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
I have never liked UVT and want it to go away and Ive been considering suggesting the implementation of an ISK booster for sometime. This thread: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=709178#post709178 has inspired me to make a thread about a solution to both.
I feel that UVT is detrimental to the game because it keeps players of Dust, which is an MMO and sociability being one of the attractions and keys to an MMOs success, from having the ability to truely be sociable, particularly with their EVE counterparts. It is also dissimilar to most AUR items in that nobody wants it. People buy boosters because it helps enhance their gameplay in a positive way, whereas the UVT enhances gameplay in a negative way. You have to buy this item to be able to verbally communicate with anyone you are not in a squad or team with.
Because of this nobody really wants to, and not many people actually do, buy it because they would rather spend their AUR on things that enhance gameplay positively. This means that the UVT is not even really doing its intended purpose which is to make CCP money and supposedly help pay for the use of 3rd party voice systems according to that thread up top.
However, an ISK booster is an item that would also enhance gameplay positively and I believe it would promote new player retention. One of the hardest things for a new player is aquiring skill points and enough ISK to keep running decent suits to aquire that SP with. Since we already have SP boosters, an ISK booster would fit right in with helping newer and older players get ahead or stay ahead. I believe it would also earn more revenue for CCP as a whole than the UVT.
Currently of the top five sellers in the market, two of the items are boosters; the 7 day active and 7 day passive. Should an ISK booster be implemented in place of the UVT I believe it would quickly make the top five sellers list, whereas there are currently no forms of UVT on that list. I posted this in the General Discussion because I know it will actually get seen here, and for people to generally discuss the topic. Please feel free to also go leave some comments in the Feeback forums on the linked thread up top. |
Jotun Hiem
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
536
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 01:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Buying ISK would be the equivalent of buying power.
No go.
Also: The UVT is in place because the voice chat is handled by a third party. The UVT profits go to maintaining it. |
Nstomper
Disqualified
227
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 01:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
Yeah isk booster will be in the pay to win category so sorry but no |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
120
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 01:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jotun Hiem wrote:Buying ISK would be the equivalent of buying power.
No go.
Also: The UVT is in place because the voice chat is handled by a third party. The UVT profits go to maintaining it.
How would it be buying ISK? You still have to earn it through matches. Hell, people in EVE can buy a PLEX and instantly sell it for hundreds of millions of ISK.
Your last point is quite invalid since the proceeds from an ISK booster could pay for 3rd party voice easier than the UVT that nobody wants to buy.
Nstomper wrote:
Yeah isk booster will be in the pay to win category so sorry but no
How would it be any more pay to win than SP boosters? |
Maken Tosch
Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation
2101
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 01:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
No. If you want ISK from payment, you just need to wait until the secondary player-controlled market opens up and allow you to sell UVTs to other players for ISK. Please keep in mind that ISK earned this way will vary according to the strict New Eden laws of Supply & Demand. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
120
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:No. If you want ISK from payment, you just need to wait until the secondary player-controlled market opens up and allow you to sell UVTs to other players for ISK. Please keep in mind that ISK earned this way will vary according to the strict New Eden laws of Supply & Demand.
What does any of that have to do with this discussion? The point of this discussion is nobody really wants UVTs and they can very easily be replaced with an ISK booster that would make CCP far more money than UVTs ever will. |
IRuby Heart
DIOS EX.
488
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:09:00 -
[7] - Quote
OP Brings up valid points and arguements, he has me convinced and I agree with him. This should be an Interesting topic, Lets see where it goes. |
Maken Tosch
Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation
2101
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
RECON BY FIRE wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:No. If you want ISK from payment, you just need to wait until the secondary player-controlled market opens up and allow you to sell UVTs to other players for ISK. Please keep in mind that ISK earned this way will vary according to the strict New Eden laws of Supply & Demand. What does any of that have to do with this discussion? The point of this discussion is nobody really wants UVTs and they can very easily be replaced with an ISK booster that would make CCP far more money than UVTs ever will.
My comment has everything to do with this discussion. Let me point it out.
1. The New Eden economy has never seen any cash-bought item that can boost a player's income like you recommended.
2. Player income, as it stands, is based on the dynamic and somewhat chaotic market forces of the economy. Dumb players lose ISK while smart players gain ISK. It's a no brainer.
3. UVTs are expected to become a very hot commodity in New Eden which will enable players who don't have cash to get a UVT for ISK by simply buying one from a player who already has one and willing to sell it after purchasing it with AUR. It's just like how PLEX works in Eve Online.
4. There are already enough players that I know of who have stockpiled a large sum of UVTs for the reason mentioned in #3. |
Protoman Is God
Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire
60
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:25:00 -
[9] - Quote
I haven't bought a UVT in months, because it's truly pointless.
ISK booster would make much more sense since there are a multitude of people who struggle with ISK. |
Icy Tiger
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
1209
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:25:00 -
[10] - Quote
^ Maken Tosch.
It will likely be months before player trading is allowed. |
|
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
438
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:27:00 -
[11] - Quote
Unfortunately, UVT's aren't really that limiting. Yes, you can't chat within corp or local, but tbh, who wants to chat in local?
Squad chat is unaffected, and I *think* team chat is unaffected either. UVT's won't be worth that much.
As for buying an isk booster with AUR... It won't be pay to win, as sure, you can keep sending out high-tier weapons out far more often than anyone else, but it doesn't improve how well you do with them. But I still disagree with it. As previously stated, there has never been a service in New Eden where you can directly buy isk with real money. It's always been in the form of real money > item > isk. It helps keep the economy stable, and helps to keep the market entirely player-driven. There's no new source of isk, so there's no ridiculous inflation. |
Geth Massredux
Defensores Doctrina
179
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:28:00 -
[12] - Quote
You should join other corps and see how many people use UVT's. They are and have been used for its purpose. Nothing to see here.... Move along... |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
966
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:30:00 -
[13] - Quote
Why would anyone need to boost ISK gains? Just don't run stuff you can't afford to lose. |
Maken Tosch
Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation
2102
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:32:00 -
[14] - Quote
Protoman Is God wrote:I haven't bought a UVT in months, because it's truly pointless.
ISK booster would make much more sense since there are a multitude of people who struggle with ISK.
If they struggle with ISK, that is there problem. Besides, over time there will be many sources of income for players. Once the secondary market comes alive players will be able to buy and sell like a typical market trader and earn their income on the side while they do matches.
@Icy
I know. It will be a long time before the market finally comes alive, but that is because the New Eden economy is a delicate beast that needs some tender love and care even and it will bite everyone's head off if done the wrong way. For this reason alone, I can't blame CCP for taking so long. After all, I would know as I am a dedicated market trader in Eve Online and I have grown to understand New Eden economics for about 7 years and counting.
EDIT:
I forgot to include the fact that mercenary contracts will one day in the foreseeable future become more lucrative and PvE mission will also be introduced in the future. |
Maken Tosch
Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation
2102
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:34:00 -
[15] - Quote
Laheon wrote:Unfortunately, UVT's aren't really that limiting. Yes, you can't chat within corp or local, but tbh, who wants to chat in local?
Squad chat is unaffected, and I *think* team chat is unaffected either. UVT's won't be worth that much.
As for buying an isk booster with AUR... It won't be pay to win, as sure, you can keep sending out high-tier weapons out far more often than anyone else, but it doesn't improve how well you do with them. But I still disagree with it. As previously stated, there has never been a service in New Eden where you can directly buy isk with real money AS SUGGESTED BY THE OP. It's always been in the form of real money > item > isk. It helps keep the economy stable, and helps to keep the market entirely player-driven. There's no new source of isk, so there's no ridiculous inflation.
Fixed it for you. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
120
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:37:00 -
[16] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:RECON BY FIRE wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:No. If you want ISK from payment, you just need to wait until the secondary player-controlled market opens up and allow you to sell UVTs to other players for ISK. Please keep in mind that ISK earned this way will vary according to the strict New Eden laws of Supply & Demand. What does any of that have to do with this discussion? The point of this discussion is nobody really wants UVTs and they can very easily be replaced with an ISK booster that would make CCP far more money than UVTs ever will. My comment has everything to do with this discussion. Let me point it out. 1. The New Eden economy has never seen any cash-bought item that can boost a player's income like you recommended. 2. Player income, as it stands, is based on the dynamic and somewhat chaotic market forces of the economy. Dumb players lose ISK while smart players gain ISK. It's a no brainer. 3. UVTs are expected to become a very hot commodity in New Eden which will enable players who don't have cash to get a UVT for ISK by simply buying one from a player who already has one and willing to sell it after purchasing it with AUR. It's just like how PLEX works in Eve Online. 4. There are already enough players that I know of who have stockpiled a large sum of UVTs for the reason mentioned in #3.
The world has never seen an MMO like EVE tied to a FPS like Dust either, so I guess Dust shouldnt exist through your logic, correct?
Dumb players would still lose ISK, and smart players would still gain ISK if a ISK booster is implemented.
UVTs will never be as popular as boosters, no matter what you or your friends want to believe. They will sell for (as an example, not real numbers) something like 1 to 10 million ISK for 1 day to 30 day whereas boosters will sell for 50 to 500 million for 1 day to 30 day.
Anymore illogical arguments you want to bring to the table? Cause it sounds mostly like you dont like this idea because youre planning on making ISK off of UVTs in the future. The far distant future that is probably a year or more from now of the player run market existing. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
120
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:39:00 -
[17] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Why would anyone need to boost ISK gains? Just don't run stuff you can't afford to lose.
Ugh, once again. Not the point of this discussion. The point is finding a way to get rid of UVTs that no one likes. Besides, youre telling me that a ISK booster would be useless? As in no one would ever buy it? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
966
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:47:00 -
[18] - Quote
RECON BY FIRE wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Why would anyone need to boost ISK gains? Just don't run stuff you can't afford to lose. Ugh, once again. Not the point of this discussion. The point is finding a way to get rid of UVTs that no one likes. Besides, youre telling me that a ISK booster would be useless? As in no one would ever buy it? No, on the contrary, everyone would buy it. It's not useless, it's too good.
And why would you want to get rid of UVTs? Just because you don't have a use for them doesn't mean others don't. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
120
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:51:00 -
[19] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:RECON BY FIRE wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Why would anyone need to boost ISK gains? Just don't run stuff you can't afford to lose. Ugh, once again. Not the point of this discussion. The point is finding a way to get rid of UVTs that no one likes. Besides, youre telling me that a ISK booster would be useless? As in no one would ever buy it? No, on the contrary, everyone would buy it. It's not useless, it's too good. And why would you want to get rid of UVTs? Just because you don't have a use for them doesn't mean others don't.
I believe I outlined this in the OP. Being able to socialize with other people in an MMO should not be inhibited and thats exactly what a UVT does. We all have a use for what the UVT allows us to do, the point is we should be able to do it without paying for it. |
Maken Tosch
Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation
2102
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:51:00 -
[20] - Quote
RECON BY FIRE wrote:
The world has never seen an MMO like EVE tied to a FPS like Dust either, so I guess Dust shouldnt exist through your logic, correct?
Excuse me, but this is not what my logic meant. Don't twist it.
Dumb players would still lose ISK, and smart players would still gain ISK if a ISK booster is implemented.
This is true.
UVTs will never be as popular as boosters, no matter what you or your friends want to believe. They will sell for (as an example, not real numbers) something like 1 to 10 million ISK for 1 day to 30 day whereas boosters will sell for 50 to 500 million for 1 day to 30 day.
I never said nor tried to imply that UVTs are going to be better. I'm just pointing out the fact that UVTs will be a hot commodities. SP boosters are going to be a hot commodity as well. However, neither of us can know for certain how much players will pay for each so we will have to wait until then to see how the market goes.
Anymore illogical arguments you want to bring to the table? Cause it sounds mostly like you dont like this idea because youre planning on making ISK off of UVTs in the future. The far distant future that is probably a year or more from now of the player run market existing.
Look, I know we have our differences, but you and I can come to an agreement that the economy is too delicate for something like ISK boosters to exist and we don't know what damaging repercussions this can bring to the market. I can already see ISK inflation as a result of ISK boosters which can undermine the value of ISK over time once the market hits. Besides, CCP can already control the ISK flow and can adjust the ISK faucet accordingly depending on how we play and provide our feedback. If CCP sees we are not earning enough ISK for the effort we put in, they will increase the rewards. Besides, who is to say that skill books won't get introduced to help us boost our PVE mission income?
|
|
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
952
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:53:00 -
[21] - Quote
Booster which advances learning: Makes sense.
Booster which advances ISK gain: Doesn't immediately appear to make sense but increasing business sense and bargaining ability to increase ISK gain would be fine with me.
I see no issue with this suggestion. |
Maken Tosch
Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation
2102
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:54:00 -
[22] - Quote
@Recon
Not everyone hates UVTs. I'm ok with them and so are a number of players I have encountered both in-game and on the forums. We just see them as a necessary thing for CCP to be able to cover the cost of the voice service. Eve Online players may be able to use free voice comms, but that's because it's part of their subscription payments. |
Maken Tosch
Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation
2102
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 02:59:00 -
[23] - Quote
One more thing I need to mention. You idea may sound good to you on paper, but one CCP employee CCP Diagoras must first see if it is practical and not harmful to the economy. He is the best economics expert we know of in New Eden. If he agrees with it, then fine. You win. If he disagrees, your idea is as dead as a mining ship getting ganked in Hulkageddon. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
120
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 03:02:00 -
[24] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:RECON BY FIRE wrote:
The world has never seen an MMO like EVE tied to a FPS like Dust either, so I guess Dust shouldnt exist through your logic, correct?
Excuse me, but this is not what my logic meant. Don't twist it.
Your logic can definately be used to infer this
Dumb players would still lose ISK, and smart players would still gain ISK if a ISK booster is implemented.
This is true.
UVTs will never be as popular as boosters, no matter what you or your friends want to believe. They will sell for (as an example, not real numbers) something like 1 to 10 million ISK for 1 day to 30 day whereas boosters will sell for 50 to 500 million for 1 day to 30 day.
I never said nor tried to imply that UVTs are going to be better. I'm just pointing out the fact that UVTs will be a hot commodities. SP boosters are going to be a hot commodity as well. However, neither of us can know for certain how much players will pay for each so we will have to wait until then to see how the market goes.
Anymore illogical arguments you want to bring to the table? Cause it sounds mostly like you dont like this idea because youre planning on making ISK off of UVTs in the future. The far distant future that is probably a year or more from now of the player run market existing.
Look, I know we have our differences, but you and I can come to an agreement that the economy is too delicate for something like ISK boosters to exist and we don't know what damaging repercussions this can bring to the market. I can already see ISK inflation as a result of ISK boosters which can undermine the value of ISK over time once the market hits. Besides, CCP can already control the ISK flow and can adjust the ISK faucet accordingly depending on how we play and provide our feedback. If CCP sees we are not earning enough ISK for the effort we put in, they will increase the rewards. Besides, who is to say that skill books won't get introduced to help us boost our PVE mission income?
No, we cannot come to an agreemant about that. What economy, market, and ISK inflation are you talking about!? We have none of these things. I believe that when we get the market we will also get some form of ISK transfer between EVE and Dust that will be far worse for inflation than an ISK booster that you still have to earn your ISK in matches to use while likely losing assets. Have you also already forgotten about that thing called PC thats coming out soon that will fill every big alliance/corps pockets with enough ISK to the point where they will likely never need ISK again?
UVT is simply a burden on the EVE and Dust link that will never be fully successfully implimented as long as UVT exists. |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
953
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 03:02:00 -
[25] - Quote
There are two separate issues at play here.
Free voice communication I am totally for.
Replacing it with ISK booster is yet to be proven as worthwhile on its own merits, isolated from the UVT discussion. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
966
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 03:04:00 -
[26] - Quote
RECON BY FIRE wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:RECON BY FIRE wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Why would anyone need to boost ISK gains? Just don't run stuff you can't afford to lose. Ugh, once again. Not the point of this discussion. The point is finding a way to get rid of UVTs that no one likes. Besides, youre telling me that a ISK booster would be useless? As in no one would ever buy it? No, on the contrary, everyone would buy it. It's not useless, it's too good. And why would you want to get rid of UVTs? Just because you don't have a use for them doesn't mean others don't. I believe I outlined this in the OP. Being able to socialize with other people in an MMO should not be inhibited and thats exactly what a UVT does. We all have a use for what the UVT allows us to do, the point is we should be able to do it without paying for it. Text chat is free, squad and team chat is free, I honestly see no reason for why voice chat in channels should be free. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
120
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 03:06:00 -
[27] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:There are two separate issues at play here.
Free voice communication I am totally for.
Replacing it with ISK booster is yet to be proven as worthwhile on its own merits, isolated from the UVT discussion.
The main discussion here is getting rid of UVT and replacing it with something that has an equal or greater ability to earn revenue for CCP to pay for the 3rd party voice services. I dont know what most of you people dont get about that. If you have better suggestions then make them, but that is the main point of this discussion. I simply feel an ISK booster meets that goal and helps new players. |
fred orpaul
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
234
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 03:06:00 -
[28] - Quote
the aur marketplace will already flood dust with isk, so no. besides this doesn't fix the reason the implemented uvts. if you notice uvts are rather inexpensive thats becuase they are not there to make money but to cover the cost of a third party voice server. So your Idea does not scale to pay for this service with nuber of people using it.
no what would be a much better idea is to let corps and channel admins buy UVTs for their entire channel, if ccp can negotiate a cost per channel from their voice service provider. I know I would happily buy UVTs for my corps chats. |
Maken Tosch
Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation
2103
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 03:14:00 -
[29] - Quote
RECON BY FIRE wrote:
No, we cannot come to an agreemant about that. What economy, market, and ISK inflation are you talking about!? We have none of these things. I believe that when we get the market we will also get some form of ISK transfer between EVE and Dust that will be far worse for inflation than an ISK booster that you still have to earn your ISK in matches to use while likely losing assets. Have you also already forgotten about that thing called PC thats coming out soon that will fill every big alliance/corps pockets with enough ISK to the point where they will likely never need ISK again?
UVT is simply a burden on the EVE and Dust link that will never be fully successfully implimented as long as UVT exists.
Dust may not have those things market wise, but Eve Online does and it is a beast of an economy that took 10 years to perfect. At the moment, the Dust and Eve economies are isolated. But once the two economies start to merge and ISK finally flows between the two, CCP has already confirmed that ISK transfers between a Dust and Eve account will see heavy taxes imposed. Therefore, it will be pointless to try to flood a Dust player with 100 million ISK if a good chunk of that ISK simply gets destroyed by the tax system along the way.
No, I have not forgotten about PC. In fact, PC is the very reason I am against your idea of an ISK booster because what's the point of having such a booster if your income will be increased via other sources anyways in the near future?
[quote]...to the point where they will likely never need ISK again?[/url]
By the way, don't assume that corps will get super rich like that. There will be way to keep the ISK flow under control. CCP Diagoras will make sure of that. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
120
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 03:19:00 -
[30] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:RECON BY FIRE wrote:
No, we cannot come to an agreemant about that. What economy, market, and ISK inflation are you talking about!? We have none of these things. I believe that when we get the market we will also get some form of ISK transfer between EVE and Dust that will be far worse for inflation than an ISK booster that you still have to earn your ISK in matches to use while likely losing assets. Have you also already forgotten about that thing called PC thats coming out soon that will fill every big alliance/corps pockets with enough ISK to the point where they will likely never need ISK again?
UVT is simply a burden on the EVE and Dust link that will never be fully successfully implimented as long as UVT exists.
Dust may not have those things market wise, but Eve Online does and it is a beast of an economy that took 10 years to perfect. At the moment, the Dust and Eve economies are isolated. But once the two economies start to merge and ISK finally flows between the two, CCP has already confirmed that ISK transfers between a Dust and Eve account will see heavy taxes imposed. Therefore, it will be pointless to try to flood a Dust player with 100 million ISK if a good chunk of that ISK simply gets destroyed by the tax system along the way. No, I have not forgotten about PC. In fact, PC is the very reason I am against your idea of an ISK booster because what's the point of having such a booster if your income will be increased via other sources anyways in the near future? Quote:...to the point where they will likely never need ISK again? By the way, don't assume that corps will get super rich like that. There will be way to keep the ISK flow under control. CCP Diagoras will make sure of that.
It will help new players, players who wish not to be in corps, and small corps. Do none of yall even remember when we didnt need a UVT to talk in corp chat? And how upset everyone was when CCP "accidentally" made it require a UVT after a patch and how it would be fixed soon, and then they just kinda never brought the subject up again. But now here we are, most of you people are arguing to keep the UVT. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |