What does any of that have to do with this discussion? The point of this discussion is nobody really wants UVTs and they can very easily be replaced with an ISK booster that would make CCP far more money than UVTs ever will.

I haven't bought a UVT in months, because it's truly pointless.

ISK booster would make much more sense since there are a multitude of people who struggle with ISK.

Unfortunately, UVT's aren't really that limiting. Yes, you can't chat within corp or local, but tbh, who wants to chat in local?

Squad chat is unaffected, and I *think* team chat is unaffected either. UVT's won't be worth that much.

As for buying an isk booster with AUR... It won't be pay to win, as sure, you can keep sending out high-tier weapons out far more often than anyone else, but it doesn't improve how well you do with them. But I still disagree with it. As previously stated, there has never been a service in New Eden where you can directly buy isk with real money AS SUGGESTED BY THE OP. It's always been in the form of real money > item > isk. It helps keep the economy stable, and helps to keep the market entirely player-driven. There's no new source of isk, so there's no ridiculous inflation.

The world has never seen an MMO like EVE tied to a FPS like Dust either, so I guess Dust shouldnt exist through your logic, correct?

Excuse me, but this is not what my logic meant. Don't twist it.

Dumb players would still lose ISK, and smart players would still gain ISK if a ISK booster is implemented.

This is true.

UVTs will never be as popular as boosters, no matter what you or your friends want to believe. They will sell for (as an example, not real numbers) something like 1 to 10 million ISK for 1 day to 30 day whereas boosters will sell for 50 to 500 million for 1 day to 30 day.

I never said nor tried to imply that UVTs are going to be better. I'm just pointing out the fact that UVTs will be a hot commodities. SP boosters are going to be a hot commodity as well. However, neither of us can know for certain how much players will pay for each so we will have to wait until then to see how the market goes.

Anymore illogical arguments you want to bring to the table? Cause it sounds mostly like you dont like this idea because youre planning on making ISK off of UVTs in the future. The far distant future that is probably a year or more from now of the player run market existing.

Look, I know we have our differences, but you and I can come to an agreement that the economy is too delicate for something like ISK boosters to exist and we don't know what damaging repercussions this can bring to the market. I can already see ISK inflation as a result of ISK boosters which can undermine the value of ISK over time once the market hits. Besides, CCP can already control the ISK flow and can adjust the ISK faucet accordingly depending on how we play and provide our feedback. If CCP sees we are not earning enough ISK for the effort we put in, they will increase the rewards. Besides, who is to say that skill books won't get introduced to help us boost our PVE mission income?

No, we cannot come to an agreemant about that. What economy, market, and ISK inflation are you talking about!? We have none of these things. I believe that when we get the market we will also get some form of ISK transfer between EVE and Dust that will be far worse for inflation than an ISK booster that you still have to earn your ISK in matches to use while likely losing assets. Have you also already forgotten about that thing called PC thats coming out soon that will fill every big alliance/corps pockets with enough ISK to the point where they will likely never need ISK again?

UVT is simply a burden on the EVE and Dust link that will never be fully successfully implimented as long as UVT exists.

The main discussion here is getting rid of UVT and replacing it with something that has an equal or greater ability to earn revenue for CCP to pay for the 3rd party voice services. I dont know what most of you people dont get about that. If you have better suggestions then make them, but that is the main point of this discussion. I simply feel an ISK booster meets that goal and helps new players.

@ Maken Tosch

Your post will continue to be irrelevant until the following criteria is met.

1.) When you actually become good at the game

2.) Find and play a real role. Not one you just tried to make up

3.) Get off your knees, and come to realization that not everything CCP creates is coated in gold

Anyways, paying for voice chat is kinda silly. Furthermore, UvT doesn't even provide that much of an extended service. Hardly worth 50cents IMO

iphone and Android app solves all issues make talking free.

So basically because you and your buddies bought up a bunch of these items in hopes of making ISK off of them someday far off when player market opens up you are trying to dismiss a discussion that offers a better and more meaningful solution to CCP making money off the game while giving us a core feature that is basically the cornerstone of social gaming on console(VOX) if this was PC yea then 3rd party apps and keyboard become viable.

Given how huge that demand can be individuals can corner a market on something that really shouldnt be cornered on which is large scale in game communication.


Sounds pretty selfish to me. At least the OP wasn't a whiny why do i have to pay for voice types and offered a creative way to ensure we have free voice but still make money for CCP to pay the bills and possible even more so.

No you are just talking in circles. The OP isn't asking for free voice chat. He's asking for a different way for CCP to monetize the game and use that money to fund the voice service.

ITs like saying we as a company will take money for many things but only this money from this one source will pay for this service. Thats silly. You pool the resources and pay the bills with everything you take in.

Point is if providing free voice without UVT requirement means X revenue loss, the OP's solution needs to at least match that revenue loss to offset it and frankly as everyone here insists people would all pay for this item than it would exceed that revenue loss which could be used to further develop the game or go into CCP's pocket.

Are you against providing a very essential form of communication in a FPS especially a console FPS and don't you want CCP to make money?

IT's not bad. Would have to depnd on the cost of the plex and what you get out of it. Personally i think booster revenue is really the only real revenue CCP can hope to monetize any money off of. Im surprised that there isn't enough money being generated by their weekly promotions and Booster sales to offset the cost of free universal communications.

Well another thing with the boosters is you can always limit their use to PC payouts on the biomass clones which are paid directly to the mercs anyway. We already can tell that the individual merc payouts are going to still not be really enough to offset the cost or a protracted and bloody battle at its current ISK values. It wont be a huge loss but difficult to generate profits as a mercs regularly unless you get bonuses from the corp but that is at corp discretion.

The utility of the ISK booster in this arena offers a good middle ground as its not something you would see running 24/7 and as such wouldnt be a true source of inflation, moreoever since the increased payout is also tied to destroyed(lost) ISK in the form of clones it actually is just getting you a better value on your dollar as opposed to generating money out of thin air.

Yea but again that money goes to the corp not direct to the mercs. This becomes an important distinction if and when mercs can begin to actually take contracts from other organizations, by increasing the payouts they can potentially earn it becomes less of burden on them and less reliant on district income or even Pub/FW income and potentially make a living just mercing in PC with the use of a paid booster however you can also expand this limit to FW as well where outcomes matter and you are likely to see higher level gear used therefore profit margins wont be excessive.

Keep in mind the booster doesn't have to be a 50% greater, even a modest 15-20% bump maybe something ppl would find worthwhile spending money on.

A plex isn't a bad idea either if its 19.99 then that means 1 person can cover 40 30day UVTs at its current cost levels. A 1:40 cost ratio isnt that bad.

A booster at say 7K AUR for 7 days would cover 7 peoples UVT coverage for 1 month. While your has a better ratio the question becomes is it sustainable? Are there enough people willing to purchase a monthly plex for this F2P, its not like EVE where the cost is worth that kind of price. The subscription would have to be pretty awesome and yet simultaneously not cross P2W.

You can already buy isk here. Use aurum gear, lose less isk = buy isk. Isk booster is no different, just an honest way of portraying it.

Yeah I said screw it and went to bed lol. The PLEX thing youre talking about sounds similar to the subscription theyre looking into for Dust, which I think is an awesome alternative to UVT. If you pay $5 subscription fee every month you dont need a UVT. This is similar to what Fallen Earth did at one time (no real clue if they still do, Im surprised they still even exist), if you wanted to use the mail system in game, which could be used to send items as well as messages, you had to pay a subscription instead of playing for free. Being able to talk without UVT could definately be a perk of the subscription, Im just wondering how much the fee will be every month.

To everyone who keeps talking about an ISK booster being the same as buying ISK, just stop. Thats not how it would be. For the example of the EVE mission runner making 20 mil an hour they would simply make 30 mil an hour with an ISK booster, not billions. It would essentially be no differant than ISK boosting skill books except that you have to spend AUR on it and it has a limit on how long it can be used.

By "might have a detrimental effect on the whole economy" I assume you're talking about the nonexistent economy we currently have and will not have for years to come? Sorry but that's a crap excuse/reason not to implement ISK boosters. Even with the arrival of the player market, ISK from EVE will flow and outweigh any kinda of possible imbalance an ISK booster may have...