...
Come on CCP lets not take 10 years to get this game rolling
I love DUST but i gotta be real PC while prob gonna be fun is still the same cbs on skirmish
Why has it taken so long to get NEW (not variations) done?

- PvE
- NEW actual PvP game modes
- Player trading
- Player market

These should be high on the priority list

PS: Ppl love to customise **** why is it cosmetics and weapon customisations not a priority......player retention is key.

Why dont we have multi-tiered "complex" modes like MAG Dominaton
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5p8_35AMeE

In DOM u had to take out the bunker line, destroy the AAA so u could call in ur strikes, secure the burnoff towers then cooling towers then overload the letters

Why dont we have a scaled down version of something like this yet?



Why is Skirmish still a poor ******** mans TITAN mode from BF2142?
If ur gonna copy a game at least do it justice and copy the game properly
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0x9m58Vol1c


Come on CCP lets not take 10 years to get this game rolling
I love DUST but i gotta be real PC while prob gonna be fun is still the same cbs on skirmish
Why has it taken so long to get NEW modes (not variations) done?

- PvE
- NEW actual PvP game modes
- Player trading
- Player market

These should be high on the priority list

PS: Ppl love to customise **** why is it cosmetics and weapon customisations not a priority......player retention is key.

"Apparently" in Uprising (at some point) we're supposed to get new stuff

^

APPARENTLY.

If by "new" you mean "old," then you are probably correct. From what I've heard, it's just that scrubby one-and-only game mode we had for a short while that many people didn't like because it was more of a redline-fest than skirmish already is.

Why couldn't you hold your rant for two weeks?

I mean seriously, two weeks. The new release will be out that day. We have read, although you might not have considering your post, about Uprising and the many, many changes including some different modes of play. UI changes, a new Battle Finder, bugs fixed, Planetary Conquest, the one control point map and the extensive Skill Tree reworking along with new weapons.

But no, your spew bucket filled up and you had to spew.

See this ^
this right here is why this ******* game wont progress

One control point map IS ******* SKIRMISH VARIATION ITS NOT NEW
Planetary Conques IS STILL SKIRMISH, the only thing different is u have territory tied to the SAME SKIRMISH WE BEEN PLAYING FOREVER NOW

STOP BEING A FANBOI AND REALISE WHEN **** IS PROGRESSING WAY TOO SLOW
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-twUCEfzrDk

PS: i read more about Uprising than u have, ive also prob been here longer than u have....are u new here? cuz afaik TLN was on BF3 when we were already beta testing DUST at the very beginning.

have a nice day

What game?

Lore.

Game modes that doesn't make sense in war are not currently in.

CTF, Free for all, and other game modes maybe even racing one day.

There may be a CTF like game in the future that is war involved (capture the launch codes) first team to 3/5 launch codes one shots the mcc.

Lore.

Game modes that doesn't make sense in war are not currently in.

CTF, Free for all, and other game modes maybe even racing one day.

There may be a CTF like game in the future that is war involved (capture the launch codes) first team to 3/5 launch codes one shots the mcc.

So whats the deal with Skirmish 1.0?

Need to get the basics down first. The FPS is looking good now, the simple maps are looking good. The next step is to introduce something really complex, Planetary Conquest. If there was a complex battle paired with a complex PC in one patch, it would be very hard to get a real good look at the PC system with all the complex variables that comes from a complex chain of battles.

Baby steps until all the basics are in place and are working properly. After all the map types get put in as their basic form, then they can start making it more complex and chaining the basic matches together. Do you feel the current maps are perfect? If not, then you should understand that it needs to be perfect before they make it more complex. If not, you will complain louder and new players will be even more lost on the battlefield.

and no only read the title... gambled on the chances the subject material was going to be the same as the last 20 threads about this and sure enough after a second read it is.

Hopefully coming back once the defender vs attacker imbalances are worked out and technology allows (apparently it was scrapped due to issues)

The basic 'front line' mechanic might also return separately for different game modes.

I am not saying I disagree with not having new game modes, I am just saying there is a reason why some game modes are not in yet because they do not fit the war theme yet.

Either way other half of the answer I guess would be code, CCP Logic Loop has his hands full working on socket behavior and map generation and game modes.

The other massive hurdle of designing game modes is designing maps to work with it. Capture the port works well on most maps. Where domination needs more forethought into flow and control. Would be awful if the defenders where forced back but they walled up on the edge of the transition zone red zoning everyone dead.

Either way the official answer is probably going to cite more complicated than its seems.

and no only read the title... gambled on the chances the subject material was going to be the same as the last 20 threads about this and sure enough after a second read it is.

Hopefully coming back once the defender vs attacker imbalances are worked out and technology allows (apparently it was scrapped due to issues)

The basic 'front line' mechanic might also return separately for different game modes.

I am not saying I disagree with not having new game modes, I am just saying there is a reason why some game modes are not in yet because they do not fit the war theme yet.

Either way other half of the answer I guess would be code, CCP Logic Loop has his hands full working on socket behavior and map generation and game modes.

The other massive hurdle of designing game modes is designing maps to work with it. Capture the port works well on most maps. Where domination needs more forethought into flow and control. Would be awful if the defenders where forced back but they walled up on the edge of the transition zone red zoning everyone dead.

Either way the official answer is probably going to cite more complicated than its seems.

sorry but even skirmish 1.0 was very basic
look at the vids

Mag War-lines looks far to scripted though. At least skirmish had A or B or C.

BF2142 ship boarding from when I remember playing it was basically game over once they started to board. Though I wouldn't mind seeing flyable MMCs, and boarding each other ships but I still want multiple options when it comes to sinking a ship other than the defenders are so screwed all must spawn to protect the sinking ship instead of trying to find a way to blow up the other ship first.

I am more interested in though in games that may involve 1 MCC pounding the hell out of an outpost which may force the defenders to call their own MCC in to deal with it the other ship and since the attckers didnt bring any null cannons with them and the defenders mcc is fitting for gank. The attackers are going to be losing one expensive ship.

OP is right, gamemodes much too bland. We are just letting them know now more 'variations' will not cut it.

its good, honest feedback.

u fanboys kidding? game cant continue with modes we would expect in quake 1.0. gamemodes have to have variety. domination crap they mentioned will hold my attention for 2 weeks after may 6. three modes in a year? no way man.