Why couldn't you hold your rant for two weeks?

I mean seriously, two weeks. The new release will be out that day. We have read, although you might not have considering your post, about Uprising and the many, many changes including some different modes of play. UI changes, a new Battle Finder, bugs fixed, Planetary Conquest, the one control point map and the extensive Skill Tree reworking along with new weapons.

But no, your spew bucket filled up and you had to spew.

Lore.

Game modes that doesn't make sense in war are not currently in.

CTF, Free for all, and other game modes maybe even racing one day.

There may be a CTF like game in the future that is war involved (capture the launch codes) first team to 3/5 launch codes one shots the mcc.

and no only read the title... gambled on the chances the subject material was going to be the same as the last 20 threads about this and sure enough after a second read it is.

Hopefully coming back once the defender vs attacker imbalances are worked out and technology allows (apparently it was scrapped due to issues)

The basic 'front line' mechanic might also return separately for different game modes.

I am not saying I disagree with not having new game modes, I am just saying there is a reason why some game modes are not in yet because they do not fit the war theme yet.

Either way other half of the answer I guess would be code, CCP Logic Loop has his hands full working on socket behavior and map generation and game modes.

The other massive hurdle of designing game modes is designing maps to work with it. Capture the port works well on most maps. Where domination needs more forethought into flow and control. Would be awful if the defenders where forced back but they walled up on the edge of the transition zone red zoning everyone dead.

Either way the official answer is probably going to cite more complicated than its seems.

Mag War-lines looks far to scripted though. At least skirmish had A or B or C.

BF2142 ship boarding from when I remember playing it was basically game over once they started to board. Though I wouldn't mind seeing flyable MMCs, and boarding each other ships but I still want multiple options when it comes to sinking a ship other than the defenders are so screwed all must spawn to protect the sinking ship instead of trying to find a way to blow up the other ship first.

I am more interested in though in games that may involve 1 MCC pounding the hell out of an outpost which may force the defenders to call their own MCC in to deal with it the other ship and since the attckers didnt bring any null cannons with them and the defenders mcc is fitting for gank. The attackers are going to be losing one expensive ship.

OP is right, gamemodes much too bland. We are just letting them know now more 'variations' will not cut it.

its good, honest feedback.

To the OP, I share your dissapointment, I'm so bored with Dust because of lack of modes (and maps) that I don't even play anymore, and won't play until the new build. There is hope though:

"Skirmish 1.0" is being worked on as code name "Infiltration". "Conquest" is also in the works, but is comes along with a much more sweeping set of features which I can't talk about at the moment. (CLICK HERE)

Conquest mode is not referring to planetary conquest, but a game mode they alluded to back last fanfest, and said it would be bigger than Skirmish (1.0).

skirmsh 1.0 might have been basic but it was still one of the best and open game modes we ever had so far. surely you have to agree.

even the two maps we had seemed more fun then the maps were on now and there the same.

This thread shows the complete lack of understanding of how even basic program developmentr works. go download the xna framework and try and make Pac man or space invaders and then come back here screaming that the devs are lasy. I might rant at ccp but I do it because they have not delivered what was promised. Not because they are lasy