Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Gauder Berwyck
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
226
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 18:31:00 -
[61] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:I'm not saying everything is equal, or that DUST is a finished product. Just that with the specific example used, the system in DUST is actually not bad.
Yes, as long as you compare a best case scenario against a worst case scenario...
I'm not trying to pick a fight, just saying that MAG is better as far as mechanics go. |
Captain-Awesome
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
355
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 18:40:00 -
[62] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:Some people just want to play. This is not the super serious EvE bunch. It's the guys who just want to have some fun. They're not interested in being taught how to play. They want a game which is accessible and fun. Dust fails on those 2. It's why my friends played replication, and 1 day of each build since. Replication was fun.
We're so far from where this game started, and no closer (from Dust perspective) to what was promised. FUBAR.
tbh, this game (like eve) isn't intended for nublets without the will to learn. as CCP said in their interviews, this is to get people clued up into getting into EVE - A much more complex arena. The attitude stays the say, you either learn it, or you don't. COD caters for the far end of the scale "plug 'n play" gamer, which is about as deep on game play as cup of ****.
That target audience will never get the game from day 1.....2... week 3 and given up by month 4. It's not the game at fault, it's their lack of investment to understand the game. He probably didn't even know there were chat rooms where he could ask people questions :p and as a result, half of his information is made up. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
397
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 18:50:00 -
[63] - Quote
Captain-Awesome wrote:
tbh, this game (like eve) isn't intended for nublets without the will to learn. as CCP said in their interviews, this is to get people clued up into getting into EVE - A much more complex arena. The attitude stays the say, you either learn it, or you don't. COD caters for the far end of the scale "plug 'n play" gamer, which is about as deep on game play as cup of ****.
It's like comparing Dark Souls to God of War... |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2006
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 19:47:00 -
[64] - Quote
"That target audience will never get the game from day 1.....2... week 3 and given up by month 4. It's not the game at fault, it's their lack of investment to understand the game. He probably didn't even know there were chat rooms where he could ask people questions :p and as a result, half of his information is made up."
Oh right. It's the people who can't be bothered to grind for hours and hours and pay -ú-ú-ú to be a contender. Hilmar will be so happy to hear that his game isn't at fault... it's just the players. Maybe they should put in a message "You're bad, quit this game" if you're not in the top 3 at the end of game too? Failfailfail. |
Avinash Decker
BetaMax. CRONOS.
29
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 19:57:00 -
[65] - Quote
I really dont think that this game isnt all the complicated although the fitting system , skill system , and market system is probably the reasons new players thinks it is, but on the ground there's nothing special about it besides losing your stuff every time you die , but since you buy everything in mass and since money can be easy to come buy it real doesnt mean all that much imo. I been playing since replication and I fail to see how this game is close to as "harsh" as Eve online. |
GeneralButtNaked
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
99
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 20:57:00 -
[66] - Quote
Captain-Awesome wrote:
tbh, this game (like eve) isn't intended for nublets without the will to learn. as CCP said in their interviews, this is to get people clued up into getting into EVE - A much more complex arena. The attitude stays the say, you either learn it, or you don't. COD caters for the far end of the scale "plug 'n play" gamer, which is about as deep on game play as cup of ****.
That target audience will never get the game from day 1.....2... week 3 and given up by month 4. It's not the game at fault, it's their lack of investment to understand the game. He probably didn't even know there were chat rooms where he could ask people questions :p and as a result, half of his information is made up.
To the bolded:
You do realize this is a game right? A free download that doesn't come with a warning that you have to be prepared to invest time and much mental faculties into it?
Does the description in the PS store tell people that before they download they should HTFU?
Saying that as a prerequisite for someone daring to try the game that they should be prepared for a serious investment of time to not suck is one hell of a hurdle to ask people to cross, for a game
Right now, the game that is asking people to jump that hurdle is a mess. No content, bad matchmaking, incomplete documentation, and more, and you want people to saddle up, book off a weekend and get down to it? For what? To get ready for some potential space war that might start at the end of the year? Or to not be behind the guys out front if this game ever gets it act together?
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
412
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:09:00 -
[67] - Quote
GeneralButtNaked wrote:
To the bolded:
You do realize this is a game right? A free download that doesn't come with a warning that you have to be prepared to invest time and much mental faculties into it?
Does the description in the PS store tell people that before they download they should HTFU?
Saying that as a prerequisite for someone daring to try the game that they should be prepared for a serious investment of time to not suck is one hell of a hurdle to ask people to cross, for a game
Right now, the game that is asking people to jump that hurdle is a mess. No content, bad matchmaking, incomplete documentation, and more, and you want people to saddle up, book off a weekend and get down to it? For what? To get ready for some potential space war that might start at the end of the year? Or to not be behind the guys out front if this game ever gets it act together?
So the fact that the game isn't finished means that it should be marketed to a different audience from the intended one? And once the game is finished, then what? At what point does "HTFU" become justified?
We probably should include "HTFU" on the Ad, "Prepare to Die" worked alright with Dark Souls. Also, I think the game shouldn't even be marketed as is. I'm only here because it's open beta, and I still think going into open beta this early was a mistake in the first place |
Wicked Glory
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
117
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:18:00 -
[68] - Quote
The original review is basically 90% right l0l. |
Skipper Jones
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
12
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:29:00 -
[69] - Quote
The dude makes some good points on the video (along with the replies of some other people) but the game doesn't suck. The game is pretty good. A lot of people want to compare this game to COD and call it bad. He exaggerated a little with the pay-to-win angle.1. this game isn't pay to win. He said that you would have to play 100 games to make the same amount of Sp as someone who has Aurum. That's not true. Aurum just gives you the ability to buy boosters and blueprint items and some aurum only items*. Also, i don't know if any of you noticed but the Aurum dropsuits are the same dropsuits you can buy with isk, just with a different name (along with other items. The only advantage that Aurum gives is that you can buy boosters, and blueprint items so you can use your isk somewhere else. But the game is NOT pay to win.
* A lot of aurum only items have the same type item sold for isk.
P.S: If you don't like this game, please just stop playing and don't try to convince other people to leave. The people who like this game want a big community, not a one that doesn't like the game. We aren't gonna be crying if you leave. Nobody cares if you like this game or not, just don't try to tell people that the game sucks because you got spawn killed.
|
Dr Debo Galaxy
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
230
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:31:00 -
[70] - Quote
The review was crap. In the same breath he complained about reload time and then said you can upgrade your reload in the skill tree. So the reload time is not slow it is just slow without SP put into reload. I feel this is the big misconnect. You can one shot, reload fast, have be able to take high damage, etc. You just have to skill into it. People are used to this just being handed down to them. |
|
ICECREAMK1NG
WARRIORS 1NC
391
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:37:00 -
[71] - Quote
Nice to see these forums are still completely over run with ccp fanboy pole smokers. |
Dr Debo Galaxy
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
230
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:40:00 -
[72] - Quote
And Le douche |
ICECREAMK1NG
WARRIORS 1NC
391
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:44:00 -
[73] - Quote
Dr Debo Galaxy wrote:And Le douche
sorry, don't speak PS |
GeneralButtNaked
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
102
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:59:00 -
[74] - Quote
Skipper Jones wrote:The dude makes some good points on the video (along with the replies of some other people) but the game doesn't suck. The game is pretty good. A lot of people want to compare this game to COD and call it bad. He exaggerated a little with the pay-to-win angle.1. this game isn't pay to win. He said that you would have to play 100 games to make the same amount of Sp as someone who has Aurum. That's not true. Aurum just gives you the ability to buy boosters and blueprint items and some aurum only items*. Also, i don't know if any of you noticed but the Aurum dropsuits are the same dropsuits you can buy with isk, just with a different name (along with other items. The only advantage that Aurum gives is that you can buy boosters, and blueprint items so you can use your isk somewhere else. But the game is NOT pay to win.
* A lot of aurum only items have the same type item sold for isk.
P.S: If you don't like this game, please just stop playing and don't try to convince other people to leave. The people who like this game want a big community, not a one that doesn't like the game. We aren't gonna be crying if you leave. Nobody cares if you like this game or not, just don't try to tell people that the game sucks because you got spawn killed.
There are certain things that are P2W, without a doubt. The complex damage mods with lower requirements being the biggest one. Then there are things like pay to get ahead, and even those come in different quantities. However we are reaching a point where those that have used boosters now have a massive SP lead on non-boosters, and an order of magnitude more SP than noobs. This is fine, but don't pretend that it isn't a tiered subscription model.
So then it becomes pay to catch up, or pay to not get stomped. Neither of which are effective business models. Especially in the FPS genre.
Your post script is insulting though. I don't know how you came to be here, but I paid to get into the closed beta. I'm here because I want to be here, and I want the game to be good. I really support CCP in their vision, and I hope they can reach the lofty goals they have set for themselves. So yes, CCP should care if I like the game or not, because I am the exact type of customer they are looking for, someone who wants to be involved with Dust for years, and is eager to see it live up to its potential.
Why is it that if you are critical of something people assume you dislike it? If I don't think the EU fishing policy accurately represents the best interests of Scottish fisheries that does not mean I think the EU sucks. |
Skipper Jones
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
12
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 22:26:00 -
[75] - Quote
GeneralButtNaked wrote:Skipper Jones wrote:The dude makes some good points on the video (along with the replies of some other people) but the game doesn't suck. The game is pretty good. A lot of people want to compare this game to COD and call it bad. He exaggerated a little with the pay-to-win angle.1. this game isn't pay to win. He said that you would have to play 100 games to make the same amount of Sp as someone who has Aurum. That's not true. Aurum just gives you the ability to buy boosters and blueprint items and some aurum only items*. Also, i don't know if any of you noticed but the Aurum dropsuits are the same dropsuits you can buy with isk, just with a different name (along with other items. The only advantage that Aurum gives is that you can buy boosters, and blueprint items so you can use your isk somewhere else. But the game is NOT pay to win.
* A lot of aurum only items have the same type item sold for isk.
P.S: If you don't like this game, please just stop playing and don't try to convince other people to leave. The people who like this game want a big community, not a one that doesn't like the game. We aren't gonna be crying if you leave. Nobody cares if you like this game or not, just don't try to tell people that the game sucks because you got spawn killed.
There are certain things that are P2W, without a doubt. The complex damage mods with lower requirements being the biggest one. Then there are things like pay to get ahead, and even those come in different quantities. However we are reaching a point where those that have used boosters now have a massive SP lead on non-boosters, and an order of magnitude more SP than noobs. This is fine, but don't pretend that it isn't a tiered subscription model. So then it becomes pay to catch up, or pay to not get stomped. Neither of which are effective business models. Especially in the FPS genre. Your post script is insulting though. I don't know how you came to be here, but I paid to get into the closed beta. I'm here because I want to be here, and I want the game to be good. I really support CCP in their vision, and I hope they can reach the lofty goals they have set for themselves. So yes, CCP should care if I like the game or not, because I am the exact type of customer they are looking for, someone who wants to be involved with Dust for years, and is eager to see it live up to its potential. Why is it that if you are critical of something people assume you dislike it? If I don't think the EU fishing policy accurately represents the best interests of Scottish fisheries that does not mean I think the EU sucks.
The post script doesn't apply to you then. I think you miss-understood my point there. I was talking to the people who don't want to be here, but continue to try and convince people the game is horrible due to argument that is invalid. I got a beta code about two months after the closed beta came out. That is how i got here.
I have not paid a single penny on this game and I've not had a problem with people with "better" items than me. (I've played a lot of people that have invested a lot of money in this game). It may be just they way i play but I've never had a problem with people killing me with the aid of aurum. Yes, this game isn't perfect, but the game is in a beta.
I think you might have miss-understood my point. I didn't say that people that are critical of something dislike it. I do have my points on why this game isn't perfect, but i do like this game.
|
Firestorm Zulu
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
177
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 22:47:00 -
[76] - Quote
I've stopped telling my friends to play this game bc I'm too tired defending it bc deep down I know it's not worth defending at this point . Maybe one day it will be good but I won't stop criticizing this game bc some arrogant fanboy things htfu is the solution to all the games problems. The truth is this game is not complicated either, it just had a terrible user interface. The delay in the menus of the neocom is enough to make anyone quit. The terrible delay and clunkinness in every menu is damning upon itself. Why is it when I access the market the first thing I have to do is press left on the d pad so I can actually scroll through the list? Every damn time you have to do that, I don't think I've ever clicked a damn thing in the store front
The game is t complicated, it's the user interface and horrible delay in virtually everything you do (including reloading) that makes this game such a chore! |
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
671
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 22:57:00 -
[77] - Quote
Firestorm Zulu wrote:Lol best review of dust yet! So honest and free of fanboyism. Sorry CCP but that video was spot on, the tongue in cheek raspy voice and metal in the background was especially hilarious. Guy know his way around the game too , you could tell when he used game specific terms like head glitch.
I bet some eve fanboy is raging so bad this guy called it aura not aurum.
Wait, fake tough guy voice is honest? Why did he have to have a fake voice to give a so called honest review? I don't think the fake voice was meant to be ironic or anything. If the raspy voice was tongue in cheek can we take anything they have to say seriously? Or do you mean that literally? As in, talking with tongue in cheek will literally give one a raspy voice? Cause I just tried it and it makes me sound more gormless than anything. And English... for some reason. |
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
671
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 23:09:00 -
[78] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG wrote:Nice to see these forums are still completely over run with ccp fanboy pole smokers.
This always gets me. Do I go on any of the forums for games published by Activision to tell everyone that spends all of their time playing activision games that they are just activision fanboy pole smokers? Isn't that kind of like going into a Burger King and complaining that the food was terrible because it wasn't Taco Bell, then raging because everyone eating a burger was just a burger fanboy?
Why would you even bother downloading this game now if you weren't at least something of a fan of CCP? I mean, unless you just stumbled across it and thought you would try it out on a whim.
I also cannot understand all of the players here who are horrible forum posters and offer nothing but disgruntled bile and vitriol and still freaking play the beta every week. What the hell are you doing? Why are you here? Do you need professional help? Why are you putting so much time and effort into the whole thing? Why do you come back to the forums when you've gotten banned? Why can't you stay away?
|
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2011
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 23:37:00 -
[79] - Quote
"I also cannot understand all of the players here who are horrible forum posters and offer nothing but disgruntled bile and vitriol and still freaking play the beta every week. What the hell are you doing? Why are you here? Do you need professional help? Why are you putting so much time and effort into the whole thing? Why do you come back to the forums when you've gotten banned? Why can't you stay away?"
Because we want what was offered. What we have now is not even as persistent as MAG. Because you can't see ANYTHING about the universe you are in. You can't see what systems in FW are good targets, or anything. Atleast in MAG the reds were the bad guys, the objectives were the only way to win games, and winning games gave you rewards for your whole faction.
I get that this "game/beta" isn't finished. SOONtm / being looked at / has been tested ISN'T enough though. Here is a good example of my concerns: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Walking_in_stations Something's just take too long...
Where did my star map go? :( |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
155
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 23:41:00 -
[80] - Quote
Oh, hey, it's Tony Calif!
Tony, we've had this argument before, haven't we? If you play the beta every week, then surely you know nothing's going to change. Surely you know that new content is released with every build. So, I'm surprised that you've lasted six months complaining about the same old stuff, over and over again. Surely you get tired of it all? |
|
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2012
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 23:58:00 -
[81] - Quote
O/ Larheon It's ok, I don't post here so much now for those exact reasons. I also don't have the time since being persuaded into becomming a part time EvEtard. I don't know how long for. But it's simple things, like showing the bonus to factions from FW at the start of the game. It's displayed for all EvE pilots in the system, why not for Dusties?
MOAR RIGHTS FOR DUSTERS ;) |
Sobriety Denied
Universal Allies Inc.
482
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 00:24:00 -
[82] - Quote
i liked both point of views |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
423
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 00:38:00 -
[83] - Quote
Firestorm Zulu wrote:I've stopped telling my friends to play this game bc I'm too tired defending it bc deep down I know it's not worth defending at this point . Maybe one day it will be good but I won't stop criticizing this game bc some arrogant fanboy things htfu is the solution to all the games problems. The truth is this game is not complicated either, it just had a terrible user interface. The delay in the menus of the neocom is enough to make anyone quit. The terrible delay and clunkinness in every menu is damning upon itself. Why is it when I access the market the first thing I have to do is press left on the d pad so I can actually scroll through the list? Every damn time you have to do that, I don't think I've ever clicked a damn thing in the store front
The game is t complicated, it's the user interface and horrible delay in virtually everything you do (including reloading) that makes this game such a chore! Actual criticism from Zulu other than "this game sucks", holy kitten! |
Altina McAlterson
TRUE TEA BAGGERS
404
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 01:08:00 -
[84] - Quote
GeneralButtNaked wrote: There are certain things that are P2W, without a doubt. The complex damage mods with lower requirements being the biggest one.
What? You mean less skill to use? That's how all the AUR items are. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
427
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 01:16:00 -
[85] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:GeneralButtNaked wrote: There are certain things that are P2W, without a doubt. The complex damage mods with lower requirements being the biggest one.
What? You mean less skill to use? That's how all the AUR items are. Nah, there's some with lower CPU and PG requirements. |
The Goram Batman
Forgotten Militia
13
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 02:08:00 -
[86] - Quote
Wow, that review was....complete and utter ****. He didn't actually explain how the dropsuit mechanics work, made a completely terrible point that "you HAVE to use Aurum" to win, which you don't. I've rolled over people that use Aurum fits in militia gear. You can play this game with pure ISK and do fine.
Also, his point that it takes 6-7 seconds to reload your gun...jesus christ man, that's a more realistic time than say 1-2 seconds like CoD...and his point about Skirmish...
But still, his opinion is his own, regardless of if I like it and all that. Dug your 'counter review' though man o7 |
Ultra Boomer3
HavoK Core
46
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 02:10:00 -
[87] - Quote
BlG MAMA wrote:Do you ever press triangle and compare guns or equipment?
So far i havent seen any "cosmetic" product being sold without some advantage attached to it.
Of course one AUR weapon doesnt do much but a whole AURUM fitting does.
David Reid knows nothing , he just repeats some lies coming down from CCP because he has the tongue to spin your little heads.
you are an open beta player, aren't you?
there used to be a ton of suits that were special colors, they were removed from the market when the open beta hit, probably to keep people from thinking they were ultimate suits and spending fortunes on them. They will come back. ever seen the red heavies? those are one of those suits, btw. as an example. |
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
434
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 02:22:00 -
[88] - Quote
The Goram Batman wrote:Wow, that review was....complete and utter ****. He didn't actually explain how the dropsuit mechanics work, made a completely terrible point that "you HAVE to use Aurum" to win, which you don't. I've rolled over people that use Aurum fits in militia gear. You can play this game with pure ISK and do fine.
Also, his point that it takes 6-7 seconds to reload your gun...jesus christ man, that's a more realistic time than say 1-2 seconds like CoD...and his point about Skirmish...
But still, his opinion is his own, regardless of if I like it and all that. Dug your 'counter review' though man o7
Did you notice the reloading while sprinting? Me neither. Ten months and we are still missing basic and core gameplay elements. |
XxWarlordxX97
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
622
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 02:24:00 -
[89] - Quote
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:The Goram Batman wrote:Wow, that review was....complete and utter ****. He didn't actually explain how the dropsuit mechanics work, made a completely terrible point that "you HAVE to use Aurum" to win, which you don't. I've rolled over people that use Aurum fits in militia gear. You can play this game with pure ISK and do fine.
Also, his point that it takes 6-7 seconds to reload your gun...jesus christ man, that's a more realistic time than say 1-2 seconds like CoD...and his point about Skirmish...
But still, his opinion is his own, regardless of if I like it and all that. Dug your 'counter review' though man o7 Did you notice the reloading while sprinting? Me neither. Ten months and we are still missing basic and core gameplay elements.
sweet |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3082
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 07:39:00 -
[90] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:Because we want what was offered. What we have now is not even as persistent as MAG. Because you can't see ANYTHING about the universe you are in. You can't see what systems in FW are good targets, or anything. Atleast in MAG the reds were the bad guys, the objectives were the only way to win games, and winning games gave you rewards for your whole faction. I get that this "game/beta" isn't finished. SOONtm / being looked at / has been tested ISN'T enough though. Here is a good example of my concerns: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Walking_in_stationsSomething's just take too long... We just want what attracted us to Dust in the first place. Where did my star map go? :(
no such thing as bad guys in new eden... just people you shoot and people you dont shoot.
Dev blog thursday |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |