Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3012
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 23:20:00 -
[151] - Quote
leafblades wrote:This is probably posted somewhere, but are any more wipes intended in the foreseeable future?
Nope
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=461847#post461847 |
Jotun Hiem
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
480
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 23:21:00 -
[152] - Quote
leafblades wrote:This is probably posted somewhere, but are any more wipes intended in the foreseeable future? Nope. |
Telcontar Dunedain
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
356
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 23:41:00 -
[153] - Quote
You all seem mad.
umad? |
Icy Tiger
Universal Allies Inc.
1063
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 23:50:00 -
[154] - Quote
So much anger in this thread... |
John Xulu
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 00:20:00 -
[155] - Quote
Well, you guys convinced me. I quit, I'll see you all again (Once/If) the game (Beta) ever gets good.
Which should be...SoonTM. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3014
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 00:20:00 -
[156] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:So much anger in this thread...
I know right? I mean these guys are getting ticked off and are being a bit selfish. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3014
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 00:21:00 -
[157] - Quote
John Xulu wrote:Well, you guys convinced me. I quit, I'll see you all again (Once/If) the game (Beta) ever gets good.
Which should be...SoonTM.
Good Hunting see you on the flip side, remember we're always free to join back up and passive sp unspent pool will be waiting for you when you get back so at least don't delete your characters. |
Telcontar Dunedain
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
356
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 00:25:00 -
[158] - Quote
I think its very legitimate to question CCPs ability to deliver this game.
The current pace of innovation and feature deployment (vs pieinthesky dreams about what this game might do) is really really slow. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3014
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 00:27:00 -
[159] - Quote
Telcontar Dunedain wrote:I think its very legitimate to question CCPs ability to deliver this game.
The current pace of innovation and feature deployment (vs pieinthesky dreams about what this game might do) is really really slow.
I agree and man you think some of those maps we showed last night would be in the game by now... also devs trolled the ones thinking about a dev blog today but the lanague when I read it seemed like 'tommorrow' and less like 'today' sort of deal. |
John Xulu
Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 00:28:00 -
[160] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:John Xulu wrote:Well, you guys convinced me. I quit, I'll see you all again (Once/If) the game (Beta) ever gets good.
Which should be...SoonTM. Good Hunting see you on the flip side, remember we're always free to join back up and passive sp unspent pool will be waiting for you when you get back so at least don't delete your characters.
I'll be back, I doubted their ability when EvE first started too, and now look at it. I'm sure they'll do this right but one can only hope. |
|
Firestorm Zulu
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
166
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 00:44:00 -
[161] - Quote
WE LOVE ReGnUM wrote:@ Iron Wolf What are you trying to do here I'am all for people discussing openly about this subject. However, you have said the same thing ten times in different ways. It is helping no one and can arguably be considered SPAM. Furthermore, in your argument against me you use the examples that BF3 and COD have long update times. Firstly, time as never been a issue. All I said is that if their builds are like the past, then its going to be very discouraging waiting 3-6 months for something new. Secondly, your right BF3 do release their updates late about 3-5 months. However, DICE has proven that each update it worth the wait. Whereas, CCP has proven nothing. Their updates usually consist of couple new things, and half of them are broken. Lastly, was it not you said we cannot compare DUST to a finished game, yet here you're comparing. Sense I'am here Iron Wolf, Lets talk about you. Your the type of player who would rather sit on the sidelines holding a sign saying, "I <3 CCP No Matter What", then actually play the game. In my opinion, your feedback is worthless, unneeded, and ultimately hurts more then helps. Your the type that ruin games. The type that would rather blindly follow, even if it was over a cliff. I would rather have one person who respectfully challenges and pushes the Devs then then a hundred Iron Wolfs. Now now, before someone starts spamming that little Flag. Let me just show you what facts and points, that have lead up to this conclusion of Iron Wolf: 1.) Iron Wolf Saber Total Kill sense last reset [1857] It has almost been two months sense the last update, and you telling me you have less the 2000 kills.You have more likes then kills! Its ironic, because it looks like you stopped playing.... a long time ago. Your telling Vets how they should think when it comes to Dust, yet you don't even play it. The Vets our dealing with the now, well you lurk on IRC for a pat on the back. 2.) You Solo???? Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Why don't you roll with your corp then?
If you go lone wolf like myself... You have to pay that price of not being able to rely on anyone, this is why I can probably mow though a squad without support at times.
This is also what makes me a very dangerous team player when I am squadded up. Your a solo player in a team game. This only further proves how little you know about the game. This game is designed around the squad. It is possible to solo play, but why would you. You're play the most simplistic part of Dust, which is a solo player in Pub-matches. However, once again you know more then the Vets that Corp battle and Specialize their squads to be more effective. 3.) You hardly Corp Battle Recon on Fire proved that. Tell me the last time you corp battle a real corp this reset. CB's is the future of DUST, yet have you ever experienced more then 10??? Talk about the great schemes of CCP, yet your not here in the game testing the platform for Fraction War. In sum, you hardly play anymore. When you do play, it is by yourself. My problem is that you make it seem like you understand all our problems and have experienced them yourself. That cannot be farther from the truth. Your not a vet. Your casual solo player who blindly follows the word of CCP. In my opinion, your words hold no shard of credibility and are, in reality, words of another new player who does really understand the game. Next time you want to talk with the big boys. I suggest you stop lurking in IRC, and play the damn Game. Whoa, is this all true iron? |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3015
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 03:36:00 -
[162] - Quote
Re: Firestorm Zulu
Yes I do solo but I understand the entire concept of team work, to the point I can look at a bunch of dots for 10 seconds and figure out who's in a squad who isn't and who to stick near and who to say as far away from as they're going to get me killed or let me die. It is infuriating to me at no end to be front-lining with 5 friendlies watching your back and they let a guy get behind me and kill me, this sort of battle field reading takes a while and often requires being outside of the fight to watch and stratagize and pre-plan ahead. Which is why I can manage to solo badly piloted tanks without assistance. I would divulge more but that's what bad field commanders do, however in due time I am sure my ideas of how to control battle-flow is not going to be unique and others will have similar conclusions and go steps beyond such as army doctrines.
I would mic up a bit more but my settings keep defaulting my voice off and turning it on doens't fix it most of the time filed bug report but I think its my bluetooth equipment being an annoying pita. I am so glad the PS4 controller HAS a mic port.
I do participate in my corp's corp battles when they're up when I am playing. They're mostly betamax vs betamax beta. Last betamax vs someone else was a 8 vs 2 with 3 tanks on our side shelling the Gallente MCC on Ashlands on the east side in hopes that our splash damage would kill one of them. Hell our bored guys on foot got in lavs and hacked all the red line orbital dropped gear as well. I also lost a militia drop-ship in that one to a crane trying to practice some flying in. It is what i mostly do on most non betamax beta corp matches that are no shows.
On average I only have time for 2-3 battles or less a business day, RL is very busy for me, and I wouldnt want to bore you with my RL problems just know they're numerous enough I barely have time for my other hobby which is artwork which at every week at I would have at least one new picture of any sort such as http://novafox.deviantart.com/art/Dust-514-Caldari-Katana-Crusader-Suit-Female-329050857 and http://novafox.deviantart.com/art/Dust-514-Caldari-MRP-9-Rail-Pistol-Bane-318046912 heck i'd let duster's blog do an article for their fake weapon of the week if they wanted also be able to hit cap weekly.
I estimate I get about 75% of the sp cap done a week though and floating around 3.8 million sp mark right now. I am also an omni-soldier so I can test various things and see what the new set of complaints are about as well which makes me markedly further behind than most pro players because of it but none the less I haven't meet a tank I couldn't in theory kill by myself or a meet an armed drop-suit either that felt unfair to fight against.
I am familiar with all weapons and their workings the only weapon I cannot sufficiently go positive with are mass drivers or its variants as I have somewhat bad spatial vision in this game and can't calculate arcs worth a damn. An angle of attack indicator may be too much of a buff though so well see...
I do have reservations about the game and many annoyances, lack of features, lack of communication, and just plain stupid glitches that shouldn't have made it in the first place. I have developed a mod int the past while it may be no grounds on being expert by any means, it does entitle me to some idea an degree to how much time consuming making a game can really be. I am human I make mistakes, CCP are also human, they're bound to make mistakes the most lauded so far http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msXRFJ2ar_E the infamous boot.ini deletion on windows ME operating systems. There have been other mistakes they've made as well that have enraged players such as failcarna. But as a tester I am expected to do things such as test the game. Not just checking for balance which will be a never ending fight and some people here think it can be ended what a silly concept. But acutal game breaking experinces annoyances things that just don't need to be in a final product.
Hell I even listed them and ccp did take note: (and whoever shoved it in ccp's face to get it on the weekly radar I hate you now) https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=53128
As you can see most of these require that I have to play in order to see these issues first hand. I would get the racial quarters bugs back in as well but the alts are currently in process of doing things.
Ultimately I do have much longer window in forum and IRC access (though I could just log an alt into irc and log everything) spanning 10 hours a day vs my possible play window of 1 hour or less on business days. As for the weekends play time nearly 0 and forum time down to a quarter or less usually before I goto bed. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3018
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 03:37:00 -
[163] - Quote
John Xulu wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:John Xulu wrote:Well, you guys convinced me. I quit, I'll see you all again (Once/If) the game (Beta) ever gets good.
Which should be...SoonTM. Good Hunting see you on the flip side, remember we're always free to join back up and passive sp unspent pool will be waiting for you when you get back so at least don't delete your characters. I'll be back, I doubted their ability when EvE first started too, and now look at it. I'm sure they'll do this right but one can only hope.
Just check back every six months and if it not to your liking please leave something for the devs to chew on. |
Average Joe81
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
21
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 04:15:00 -
[164] - Quote
I actually just came back to dust to say what the original guy was saying, so +1 i guess |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
649
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 04:22:00 -
[165] - Quote
The need for such a lengthy self explanation is ridiculous. I have IRL stuff too. Stop using it as a crutch. There are many major things wrong with this game. Please stop defending the lack of communication between CCP and its community on any real plans.
There are too many excuses and not enough results. We don't demand the herculean here, just that CCP interacts with us and is willing to take the idiocy of a few people who get butt hurt that a deadline isn't met. If they were just open with us it would be 10x better. What other dev promises features but then doesn't attempt to explain them in the least, especially during alpha where feedback is huge?
The game needs more frequent and substantial updates, and thats in terms of communications as well as content. |
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
280
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 04:49:00 -
[166] - Quote
Captain-Awesome wrote:Not sure what to say - on both sides really, 3-6 months is a long time for FPS players as they are not used to the MMO aspects of updates, at the same time, CCP needs time to develop :)
there's only one way to solve this.... FIGHT TO THE DEATH. Don't we always? |
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
281
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 05:02:00 -
[167] - Quote
Free Beers wrote:So you claim to represent the low skill low sp point of veiw in dust? Fair enough then I'll let you have that. As for my tone please take as me laughing at you, not with you. I am embarrassed for you and that fact that you have to defend your CCP fanboi every time you post. You can't even constructively discuss anything that doesn't paint ccp in a good light. I have no problem saying when CCP is awesome and when they fail. It's never personal as I'd still buy them a few beers if I could.
All fps games if done properly are scaled to skill and balance at the top, not the bottom. This game will fail if ccp says "we should listen to the casual scrub player who would rather do pve then pvp. That will make dust better." When you play at the limits of the game you see things differently and how they impact play. dust has to balance gear and vehicles for corp battles not public play. Why? Thats the part of dust that matters. Thats where we interact with EvE.
I am part of a club, but its one for people that are honest regarding the current state of dust. Its a big club too.
Now you see? THAT is an (almost) completely constructive post, and one that should be put up as a new thread. Bickering here among ourselves isn't helping, but this post could be a GREAT thread. It could even be the start for a series of threads.
The first thread could be all about why we should balance the game towards corp battles and how to adjust pub matches to cope with the changes made towards this end.
Then you could follow with a series of threads about specific things and how they could be better changed to be properly balanced for corp battles. Tanks, missiles, dropsuits, weapons, passive skill scaling, the works.
You have it in you Beers, you've done this plenty in the past. Your trolling instincts just get in the way sometimes. Why don't you start the series, and we can all congregate there to discuss fixing this thing instead of wasting time with all of this back and forth bickering? I know you want this game to succeed, otherwise you wouldn't attack it so harshly when it goes off course. I'll join you there in that thread to harass you the whole way through if you like. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3018
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 05:06:00 -
[168] - Quote
J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:The need for such a lengthy self explanation is ridiculous. I have IRL stuff too. Stop using it as a crutch. There are many major things wrong with this game. Please stop defending the lack of communication between CCP and its community on any real plans.
There are too many excuses and not enough results. We don't demand the herculean here, just that CCP interacts with us and is willing to take the idiocy of a few people who get butt hurt that a deadline isn't met. If they were just open with us it would be 10x better. What other dev promises features but then doesn't attempt to explain them in the least, especially during alpha where feedback is huge?
The game needs more frequent and substantial updates, and thats in terms of communications as well as content.
Fine: Dust 514 has have nearly weekly market updates if successful and weekly hotfix deployments/patches as well combine with a weekly story battle now for a month now.
Eve online gets 1-5 dev posts a day, dust 514 has at leas a few dozen this month... yet people still complain. Hell Eve online had a content patch last week and there are peoplefishing about how world of darkness is taking away developer time on eve and lack of developer interaction on eve online. In the end the complaint has been childish, it is childish and it will always be childish no matter how well you twist it and the worst problem is, we had this argument every month since e3 beta and I foresee that we are never going to see this complaint go away ever, even if dust 514 is successful over the course of the next 10 years, this complaint will rise up again, people will whine about no dev blogs and blame eve online for some other game for it.
And you're going to ignore all this? Call it nothing, call it insignificant, call it not an update? Got news for you those are updates, they're only a skip hop away different from content adding, those are communication between devs and on the forums, and the devs reading out role players every week as well.
So once again... what part of the complaint sounds mature? Because I see a little kid in the ice cream section of the store getting told no by the parents and the kid is crying why . This is I consider this whine far more shortsighted, ignorant and immature than majority of the nerf tank threads.
Also focus and read better. They where reaching for means to attack me because they where losing on the main point and didn't want to argue against me there anymore and started personally attacking me as any sort of voice worth listening to. Ad-honem attacks are typically submission of defeat usually because the other side ran out of points to bring out.
I am sure you wouldn't like it if your voice is dismissed because you like having rapper names. Or like using apostrophe in the middle of your name to make it sound elvish/fantasy and overall its a stupid thing to really attack you over. Just as previous attacks on me 'possibly' being a furry have never gone well for the accuser.
Overall take the damn ADHD pill and wait an Amarr damned moment. When the devs are ready they will be ready and they don't owe you an explanation, a date, or time or a why. Yet out of many companies CCP is very gracious in giving this out and I honestly think the lot of you been spoiled to the point of having cavities. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
3018
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 05:18:00 -
[169] - Quote
Baal Omniscient wrote:Free Beers wrote:So you claim to represent the low skill low sp point of veiw in dust? Fair enough then I'll let you have that. As for my tone please take as me laughing at you, not with you. I am embarrassed for you and that fact that you have to defend your CCP fanboi every time you post. You can't even constructively discuss anything that doesn't paint ccp in a good light. I have no problem saying when CCP is awesome and when they fail. It's never personal as I'd still buy them a few beers if I could.
All fps games if done properly are scaled to skill and balance at the top, not the bottom. This game will fail if ccp says "we should listen to the casual scrub player who would rather do pve then pvp. That will make dust better." When you play at the limits of the game you see things differently and how they impact play. dust has to balance gear and vehicles for corp battles not public play. Why? Thats the part of dust that matters. Thats where we interact with EvE.
I am part of a club, but its one for people that are honest regarding the current state of dust. Its a big club too.
Now you see? THAT is an (almost) completely constructive post, and one that should be put up as a new thread. Bickering here among ourselves isn't helping, but this post could be a GREAT thread. It could even be the start for a series of threads. The first thread could be all about why we should balance the game towards corp battles and how to adjust pub matches to cope with the changes made towards this end. Then you could follow with a series of threads about specific things and how they could be better changed to be properly balanced for corp battles. Tanks, missiles, dropsuits, weapons, passive skill scaling, the works. You have it in you Beers, you've done this plenty in the past. Your trolling instincts just get in the way sometimes. Why don't you start the series, and we can all congregate there to discuss fixing this thing instead of wasting time with all of this back and forth bickering? I know you want this game to succeed, otherwise you wouldn't attack it so harshly when it goes off course. I'll join you there in that thread to harass you the whole way through if you like.
1 Asks a pointed question, makes destructive statement. 2 Insults, attempts shame but its an insult. 3 Another personal attack, a baseless accusation 4 fails to see the point of all my posting which means he has a stereotype complex. 5 A totally useless oxymoron lack of sentiment statement. 6 Also a likely lie if they ever met in a professional environment.
1 Makes another baseless fact the number of shooter games with top to bottom balancing is few and far between. Also just further concretes the evidence that he doesn't care as much about newer player experiences/frustations and not believing any encouragement to make it seem possible to get to the 'top.' 2 Makes an ignorant statement on how ccp decides features. Also doesnt seem to understand how ccp is planning pve. 3 States that End game is the only game. 4 Also thinks the game needs to hinge on a feature that was brought in as a last-thought mostly test bed for up and coming center piece FW fights in which Conquest mode will be based off of. 5 Makes an arrogant statement on how the game should run from his point of view, discounting meta, market, territory, wars, and numerous other features that would improve the game far more than just corp battle+
Yeah I agree its sounds really constructive
|
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
281
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 06:25:00 -
[170] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Baal Omniscient wrote:Free Beers wrote:----Snipped for space----
Now you see? THAT is an (almost) completely constructive post, and one that should be put up as a new thread. Bickering here among ourselves isn't helping, but this post could be a GREAT thread. It could even be the start for a series of threads. The first thread could be all about why we should balance the game towards corp battles and how to adjust pub matches to cope with the changes made towards this end. Then you could follow with a series of threads about specific things and how they could be better changed to be properly balanced for corp battles. Tanks, missiles, dropsuits, weapons, passive skill scaling, the works. You have it in you Beers, you've done this plenty in the past. Your trolling instincts just get in the way sometimes. Why don't you start the series, and we can all congregate there to discuss fixing this thing instead of wasting time with all of this back and forth bickering? I know you want this game to succeed, otherwise you wouldn't attack it so harshly when it goes off course. I'll join you there in that thread to harass you the whole way through if you like. 1 Asks a pointed question, makes destructive statement. 2 Insults, attempts shame but its an insult. 3 Another personal attack, a baseless accusation 4 fails to see the point of all my posting which means he has a stereotype complex. 5 A totally useless oxymoron lack of sentiment statement. 6 Also a likely lie if they ever met in a professional environment. 1 Makes another baseless fact the number of shooter games with top to bottom balancing is few and far between. Also just further concretes the evidence that he doesn't care as much about newer player experiences/frustations and not believing any encouragement to make it seem possible to get to the 'top.' 2 Makes an ignorant statement on how ccp decides features. Also doesnt seem to understand how ccp is planning pve. 3 States that End game is the only game. 4 Also thinks the game needs to hinge on a feature that was brought in as a last-thought mostly test bed for up and coming center piece FW fights in which Conquest mode will be based off of. 5 Makes an arrogant statement on how the game should run from his point of view, discounting meta, market, territory, wars, and numerous other features that would improve the game far more than just corp battle+ Yeah I agree its sounds really constructive Ok, taking it a bit far. Failing to see your point doesn't make the post unconstructive, I see the insults as a single offense and not one that needs to be pettily split up into parts (as in it was an almost completely constructive post other than the insults scattered about), and a show of good nature (lie or not) is at least a minor effort to be more agreeable.
You have to have a point to start with when balancing a game, you can't just randomly tweak numbers and hope it all falls into place. Balancing from the bottom up doesn't work since the small amount of invested SP is much to negligible and scattered to approximate and balance gameplay upon. When you balance from the top down, you can line up things better for public matches which newer players will experience first.
Matchmaking is what is needed to help new players atm, and as you say plenty, CCP is working on it. Let them finish it before you get too carried away with labeling ideas for balancing as good or bad. Have some faith that they are working on getting matchmaking worked in a proper manner.
Once corp battles are properly balanced, you can adjust public matches scaled out by the data gathered by balancing corp battles. It makes a lot of sense to start with the smallest matches, and well as the matches where people always bring their best gear every time. Start with corp battles, get them balanced, then it will be easier to see how to balance a match with more players of varied skill levels. I don't say this because I agree with any feeling of superiority that others may or may not have, I say it because it seems to me the most logical approach to the situation. Please do tell me if I am wrong, but in a proper thread on the matter.
In the mean time, matchmaking is doing a so/so job of keeping newberries from getting in too far over their heads, it'll do for now and it'll get better eventually. There is a group working on it just like with everything else, it just takes time
As I said before when you lost your cool at Jackel, please don't act this way because it does nothing but make you loose credibility. Which is a large part of why Beers has so much trouble getting his points across. He has great technical knowledge of this game, but he doesn't always use it productively, and destructive threads like this that he participates in have done nothing but distract him and others from his contributions. And you from yours. We've got better things to do than to argue over silly crap like this when there are so many constructive threads to write and debate and problems with the game to address. Let's get at it and leave this kind of distraction behind, shall we? |
|
Karl Koekwaus
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
34
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 07:34:00 -
[171] - Quote
Looking at the market tabs in EVE for Dust items make this whole Dust is a GOOD GAME and still in BETA so it doesn't have to be GOOD is redundant. Sales are declining across the board. Unless people are massively buying AUR items, they aren't impressed with the game to say it mildly. |
TERMINALANCE
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
32
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 07:40:00 -
[172] - Quote
cry me a dam river. You guys are a bunch of whiny entitled children, no one says you have to grind sp, you choose to. HTFU or do something else and let the passives take care of it.
pathetic. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
335
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 07:43:00 -
[173] - Quote
TERMINALANCE wrote:no one says you have to grind sp But if they don't grind, then they will miss out on their precious SP. Oh noes! |
Bald Crusader Two
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 08:09:00 -
[174] - Quote
Telcontar Dunedain wrote:I think its very legitimate to question CCPs ability to deliver this game.
The current pace of innovation and feature deployment (vs pieinthesky dreams about what this game might do) is really really slow.
The fanbois are not helping ccp figure this out sooner rather then later. I suspect it's going to be a delivery with forceps, and it's going to come out looking like Sloth.
Then they purge Shanghai and it will be another two years post-Incarna drift along. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
335
|
Posted - 2013.03.07 15:34:00 -
[175] - Quote
Bald Crusader Two wrote: and it's going to come out looking like Sloth.
That must be one handsome game then. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |