DUST Search - [Feedback] Skirmish 2.0 needs a sense of urgency

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

[Feedback] Skirmish 2.0 needs a sense of urgency

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
The-Last-Ninja FIND CARL CORP 34	Posted - 2013.02.17 04:00:00 - [61] - Quote +1. I assumed we would have something akin to Titan mode when I was checking info on DUST. When I told people about DUST back then, I even told them the objective mode would be similar to Conquest/Titan mode. Would be great if they added that to make it even closer to Titan mode. I miss the mode we had in Mordu's Private Trials. It was like MAG's Sabotage or Battlefield's Rush mode, but with Skirmish as the final part. Was that considered Skirmish 1.0? If so, that, with the addition of being able to board the enemy MCC, would make the game much more interesting.
Thranx1231 CowTek 90	Posted - 2013.02.17 04:04:00 - [62] - Quote Finished a Skirmish earlier to day with less than four bars on both MCCs. We won 2 clones to Zero with neither MCC being destroyed, That was pretty intense. Just saying.
Terry Webber Gothic Wars Consortium 35	Posted - 2013.02.17 19:22:00 - [63] - Quote Who else likes this idea?
Kreigs Jaeger Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic 11	Posted - 2013.02.17 21:50:00 - [64] - Quote Probably one of the best game modes in a shooter, period. I approve. Edit: Furthermore, this would be a great prelude to ship/station/in space boarding actions.
The Black Jackal The Southern Legion 302	Posted - 2013.02.17 22:48:00 - [65] - Quote +1
Terry Webber Gothic Wars Consortium 35	Posted - 2013.02.18 05:20:00 - [66] - Quote I really support this idea. Does anyone else think the same?
Terry Webber Gothic Wars Consortium 35	Posted - 2013.02.19 00:06:00 - [67] - Quote Who likes this idea?
Terry Webber Gothic Wars Consortium 35	Posted - 2013.02.21 01:02:00 - [68] - Quote What do you guys think of this idea? I like it.
DrunkardBastards Inebriated Liberation Front 23	Posted - 2013.02.22 22:58:00 - [69] - Quote I too, am one of those that thought this would have a mode like titan mode.. and also, the old skirmish was a hell of a lot better. Combine the two? +1000 now for random brain stuff. Remove the redlines add a bunch of turrets on the mcc to deal with enemy camping. Maybe have different parts of the MCC destructible (like the turrets), or what if you could have the war barge drop you from orbit via some capsule or something that you have to buy on the market place as an alternate spawn point. My only real other thought is that waiting until the shields are down might be a little too early to be allowed to board the MCC, maybe make it so you have to brute force your way past some armor plate or some **** to open a hole once the shields are down.(Tanks, Swarm Launchers, forge guns ect.) while the mcc hammers you with bullets.. would be fun..
Courben Daliss Ghost Wolf Industries 1	Posted - 2013.02.23 01:11:00 - [70] - Quote +1 for being able to board and attack the enemy MCC. Redlined games do tend to drag on and on. I also don't like playing skirmish on the smaller 3 base maps. Skirmish should be reserved for large 5 base maps or even 6 or 7 base maps.

Terry Webber Gothic Wars Consortium 35	Posted - 2013.02.24 18:23:00 - [71] - Quote Who else supports this?
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 3064	Posted - 2013.02.26 23:42:00 - [72] - Quote Good idea is good
Talruum Tezztarozza Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 79	Posted - 2013.02.27 08:41:00 - [73] - Quote Add my support to this idea +1
Terry Webber Gothic Wars Consortium 37	Posted - 2013.03.02 04:01:00 - [74] - Quote Who else supports this?
IR Scifi Algintal Core Gallente Federation 18	Posted - 2013.03.02 04:59:00 - [75] - Quote I'd just be happy with the occasional return of version 1.0 it was great fun sneaking around an enemy camp to cap on of the undefended letters. You really did get the feeling of being part of an invasion.
Terry Webber Gothic Wars Consortium 39	Posted - 2013.03.08 22:38:00 - [76] - Quote Any feedback on this?
RINON114 B.S.A.A. 32	Posted - 2013.03.09 04:32:00 - [77] - Quote You certainly are persistent OP, but that's how this idea will make it into the game. I love it. BF 2142 was incredible and Titan mode was so intense. Perhaps to add to this, maybe the MCC has 2-3 weak spots (maybe with options to fit more) inside that need to be destroyed, each time one is destroyed it kills all of the enemy soldiers inside, but only after a 60 second countdown so they have a chance to escape and assault it again. 0.02 isk
Terry Webber Gothic Wars Consortium 40	Posted - 2013.03.09 20:23:00 - [78] - Quote RINON114 wrote: You certainly are persistent OP, but that's how this idea will make it into the game. I love it. BF 2142 was incredible and Titan mode was so intense. Perhaps to add to this, maybe the MCC has 2-3 weak spots (maybe with options to fit more) inside that need to be destroyed, each time one is destroyed it kills all of the enemy soldiers inside, but only after a 60 second countdown so they have a chance to escape and assault it again. 0.02 isk I'm not the OP, but I really support this. I'm just posting to get people behind this.
RINON114 B.S.A.A. 32	Posted - 2013.03.10 01:30:00 - [79] - Quote Terry Webber wrote: RINON114 wrote: You certainly are persistent OP, but that's how this idea will make it into the game. I love it. BF 2142 was incredible and Titan mode was so intense. Perhaps to add to this, maybe the MCC has 2-3 weak spots (maybe with options to fit more) inside that need to be destroyed, each time one is destroyed it kills all of the enemy soldiers inside, but only after a 60 second countdown so they have a chance to escape and assault it again. 0.02 isk I'm not the OP, but I really support this. I'm just posting to get people behind this. Ah okay, well that's even better! I do think that we really need to wait and see as far as Dust is concerned because I'm certain the devs have a lot planned for release. In my support for this idea I would like to add that boarding an MCC would be incredible. It would be an incredible contrast between the usual large open spaces in skirmish.
Terry Webber Gothic Wars Consortium 46	Posted - 2013.03.16 06:33:00 - [80] - Quote Sorry for bumping an old post but this idea could make Skirmish 2.0 awesome. Any feedback on this?

RINON114 B.S.A.A. 42	Posted - 2013.03.16 09:59:00 - [81] - Quote Terry Webber wrote: Sorry for bumping an old post but this idea could make Skirmish 2.0 awesome. Any feedback on this? I think I've said all I need to with your post confirming it! I will however offer my continued watch over this thread.
Cat Merc Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore 45	Posted - 2013.03.16 11:12:00 - [82] - Quote Make this happen. BF2142 was my favorite BF game of all time, in no small part thanks to the Titan mode. Too bad the servers are dead :(
J'Jor Da'Wg KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 665	Posted - 2013.03.16 18:56:00 - [83] - Quote DUST still needs more sudden death win conditions for game modes, makign it more exciting. Blow up an objective via plating a charge with a short fuse, etc. something that isnt a slow predictable grind to damage the enemy MCC or drop their clone supplies.
RINON114 B.S.A.A. 44	Posted - 2013.03.17 01:41:00 - [84] - Quote J'Jor Da'Wg wrote: DUST still needs more sudden death win conditions for game modes, makign it more exciting. Blow up an objective via plating a charge with a short fuse, etc. something that isnt a slow predictable grind to damage the enemy MCC or drop their clone supplies. Maybe not too quick. I like the Rush game mode in BF Bad Company 2, the timing on those is about right. If the MCC could be assaulted after the shields drop then two or three weak points could be destroyed to bring it down. The one downside to this is that it doesn't really give the losing side a chance if they're getting trounced, it just ends the match quicker for the better side. The counter to this is having a certain time pass before the MCC becomes a target, maybe involving some kind of e-warfare or something that opens a gap in the shields?
J'Jor Da'Wg KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 666	Posted - 2013.03.17 01:57:00 - [85] - Quote RINON114 wrote: J'Jor Da'Wg wrote: DUST still needs more sudden death win conditions for game modes, makign it more exciting. Blow up an objective via plating a charge with a short fuse, etc. something that isnt a slow predictable grind to damage the enemy MCC or drop their clone supplies. Maybe not too quick. I like the Rush game mode in BF Bad Company 2, the timing on those is about right. If the MCC could be assaulted after the shields drop then two or three weak points could be destroyed to bring it down. The one downside to this is that it doesn't really give the losing side a chance if they're getting trounced, it just ends the match quicker for the better side. The counter to this is having a certain time pass before the MCC becomes a target, maybe involving some kind of e-warfare or something that opens a gap in the shields? Yes I didnt mean like within 2 to 3 seconds, probabl like a minute or two, somethin balanced to give defenders time to get to the objective once or twice before it explodes.
Terry Webber Gothic Wars Consortium 53	Posted - 2013.03.19 02:24:00 - [86] - Quote Any more good feedback?
RINON114 B.S.A.A. 67	Posted - 2013.03.22 15:04:00 - [87] - Quote Terry Webber wrote: Any more good feedback? The only thing I feel I can add is another push for CCP to hurry this up. I think planetary conquest could help fill this gap and this game mode is only really faesable when the player market happens and we have player owned MCC's, otherwise it becomes too similar to skirmish as it is now. When players can fit an MCC in certain ways that allow for enough distinction between the game modes then I'm sure we'll see skirmish 2.0. With regards to ideas for MCC fittings, perhaps players could increase the weak points an MCF has at the cost of lowering shields sooner, giving a nice tradeoff between how quickly players can make an assault and how well that can carry it off in order to destroy twice the amount of weak points. For example...
Daedric Lothar Onslaught Inc 15	Posted - 2013.03.22 15:18:00 - [88] - Quote Mavado V Noriega wrote: ...]Titan Mode from BF2142 .... Yes, yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes. That game was awesome +50. I thought it was one of the better BF games out there. This game isn't as good as that one, but I hope it gets there one day! CCP can do it.
slypie11 Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore 7	Posted - 2013.03.22 16:24:00 - [89] - Quote definitely. This would add something to the game that is unique, something that many modern FPS games lack. If this game is going to be popular, it needs to stand out from the huge pool of mediocre FPS games, and the only way to do this is to have something no one else does. Besides, adding some new to the standerd capture the flag/king of the hill formula would be awesome. +1
Terry Webber Gothic Wars Consortium 57	Posted - 2013.03.24 20:42:00 - [90] - Quote Would anyone else like to voice their support?



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.