Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Omnipotens Zitro
Doomheim
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 15:24:00 -
[1] - Quote
Imperfects would be interested in doing a feedback/input session in game instead of the Dev's dust match. In the voice session we can ask questions and give feedback/input. We feel this will be more valuable than playing a much against you guys. It will give you the Dev's valuable information to help make Dust 514 a better game for the whole community.
CCP please reply to acknowledge if this is possible or not. Thank you!
|
Jariel Manton
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
210
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 15:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
Awesome idea, perhaps if it is to happen you could post a write up of your intended topics to cover and we can put some feedback into it. The more voices the better. |
ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
80
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 15:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Imperfects would be interested in doing a feedback/input session in game instead of the Dev's dust match. In the voice session we can ask questions and give feedback/input. We feel this will be more valuable than playing a much against you guys. It will give you the Dev's valuable information to help make Dust 514 a better game for the whole community.
CCP please reply to acknowledge if this is possible or not. Thank you!
OP just trying to farm likes... REPEAT do not like OP |
Alldin Kan
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
169
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 15:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Imperfects would be interested in doing a feedback/input session in game instead of the Dev's dust match. In the voice session we can ask questions and give feedback/input. We feel this will be more valuable than playing a much against you guys. It will give you the Dev's valuable information to help make Dust 514 a better game for the whole community.
CCP please reply to acknowledge if this is possible or not. Thank you!
OP just trying to farm likes... REPEAT do not like OP
It's too late... |
Sylwester Dziewiecki
Doomheim
83
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 16:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Imperfects would be interested in doing a feedback/input session in game instead of the Dev's dust match. In the voice session we can ask questions and give feedback/input. We feel this will be more valuable than playing a much against you guys. It will give you the Dev's valuable information to help make Dust 514 a better game for the whole community.
CCP please reply to acknowledge if this is possible or not. Thank you!
In CCP interest is to give feedback/input session, one per some time, this is a part of the advertising - irrespective of whether we like it or not, we always get this from CCP(at least once per year on FF), with is cool. Match with Dev's is something we don't get that often, still you want to change something valuable for something common. Do all community favour and ask Grideris to make session with CCP, and give SI match with Dev's if you don't want it. I'm sure everyone will be happy with it. |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1012
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 16:25:00 -
[6] - Quote
Only problem is what would Imperfects ask?
Would they true to make DUST gun game only and get tanks super nerfed or would they actually offer proper feedback and ask questions which helps the game in general and not purse ther own agenda tbh |
fahrenheitM
Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION
212
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 16:29:00 -
[7] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:Only problem is what would Imperfects ask?
Would they true to make DUST gun game only and get tanks super nerfed or would they actually offer proper feedback and ask questions which helps the game in general and not purse ther own agenda tbh
From what I've seen on here, many of their players have the correct mindset in that they want to see this game succeed. |
HowDidThatTaste
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
2242
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 16:31:00 -
[8] - Quote
Actually I think the developers will get a much better taste of the game if the imperfects bring there tanks and drop ships out for a dev stomping. The problem is they will red line them in 1 min and have a long boring match. So maybe they should just have open comms while they roll over them |
fahrenheitM
Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION
212
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 16:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:Actually I think the developers will get a much better taste of the game if the imperfects bring there tanks and drop ships out for a dev stomping. The problem is they will red line them in 1 min and have a long boring match. So maybe they should just have open comms while they roll over them
Bingo! |
Sylwester Dziewiecki
Doomheim
83
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 16:39:00 -
[10] - Quote
fahrenheitM wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:Only problem is what would Imperfects ask?
Would they true to make DUST gun game only and get tanks super nerfed or would they actually offer proper feedback and ask questions which helps the game in general and not purse ther own agenda tbh From what I've seen on here, many of their players have the correct mindset in that they want to see this game succeed. Same as 99,99% users of this forum, that not an argument. I'm not scare of what they could possibly ask. I'm scare that I waste time waiting for final reward that this tourney brings for community. |
|
Omnipotens Zitro
Doomheim
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 16:50:00 -
[11] - Quote
Playing a match against the Dev's doesn't help advance the game. If we do play them they will most likely nerf what ever we used and buff the opposite. We get nowhere with that based off the last time the players faced the Dev's. It will just be more time wasted. Yes it would be fun to play and stomp the Dev's but I would rather give them useful insight and information on what needs to be done to help this game become balance for everybody.
Everybody knows that there is alot of imbalance in the game. Armor tanks are useless, turrets are to powerful, Logi's don't have a pro dominate role, nobody uses armor plates(except heavies), to small of armor reps for heavies, redline needs to be fix, etc, etc, etc. So much more to type about that needs adjusting.
To accuss us of not being for the players is stupid. We have players that are spec into every single role. |
William HBonney
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
318
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 16:55:00 -
[12] - Quote
Even speced into swarms...those idiots |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 16:56:00 -
[13] - Quote
Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Playing a match against the Dev's doesn't help advance the game. If we do play them they will most likely nerf what ever we used and buff the opposite. We get nowhere with that based off the last time the players faced the Dev's. It will just be more time wasted. Yes it would be fun to play and stomp the Dev's but I would rather give them useful insight and information on what needs to be done to help this game become balance for everybody.
Everybody knows that there is alot of imbalance in the game. Armor tanks are useless, turrets are to powerful, Logi's don't have a pro dominate role, nobody uses armor plates(except heavies), to small of armor reps for heavies, redline needs to be fix, etc, etc, etc. So much more to type about that needs adjusting.
To accuss us of not being for the players is stupid. We have players that are spec into every single role.
this and tbh over the past few days on irc me and a few others from both SyN and Imp (noc and tiel) and even nova as well have been having good discussions on multiple fixes to swarms to sniping to armor etc it would be nice if the devs had a chat with ppl and not have to worry about wading through alot of the QQ feedback or just nonsense suggestions.
quicker devs can seperate good feedback from the bad is the quicker the game can progress. They wont be able to please everyone obv |
Omnipotens Zitro
Doomheim
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 16:57:00 -
[14] - Quote
Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Imperfects would be interested in doing a feedback/input session in game instead of the Dev's dust match. In the voice session we can ask questions and give feedback/input. We feel this will be more valuable than playing a much against you guys. It will give you the Dev's valuable information to help make Dust 514 a better game for the whole community.
CCP please reply to acknowledge if this is possible or not. Thank you!
In CCP interest is to give feedback/input session, one per some time, this is a part of the advertising - irrespective of whether we like it or not, we always get this from CCP(at least once per year on FF), with is cool. Match with Dev's is something we don't get that often, still you want to change something valuable for something common. Do all community favour and ask Grideris to make session with CCP, and give SI match with Dev's if you don't want it. I'm sure everyone will be happy with it. It's not common to be able to talk to all the Dev's at one time in one place. Yes players talk to the Dev's in IRC but it is usually with 1 or 2 of them at a time and they are usually busy.
Having the chance to talk to all of the Dev team at the same time in one place is more valuable than the BO LAV. |
Ludwig Van Beatdropin
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
195
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 16:59:00 -
[15] - Quote
I approve this message. |
fahrenheitM
Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION
212
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 17:14:00 -
[16] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Playing a match against the Dev's doesn't help advance the game. If we do play them they will most likely nerf what ever we used and buff the opposite. We get nowhere with that based off the last time the players faced the Dev's. It will just be more time wasted. Yes it would be fun to play and stomp the Dev's but I would rather give them useful insight and information on what needs to be done to help this game become balance for everybody.
Everybody knows that there is alot of imbalance in the game. Armor tanks are useless, turrets are to powerful, Logi's don't have a pro dominate role, nobody uses armor plates(except heavies), to small of armor reps for heavies, redline needs to be fix, etc, etc, etc. So much more to type about that needs adjusting.
To accuss us of not being for the players is stupid. We have players that are spec into every single role. this and tbh over the past few days on irc me and a few others from both SyN and Imp (noc and tiel) and even nova as well have been having good discussions on multiple fixes to swarms to sniping to armor etc it would be nice if the devs had a chat with ppl and not have to worry about wading through alot of the QQ feedback or just nonsense suggestions. quicker devs can seperate good feedback from the bad is the quicker the game can progress. They wont be able to please everyone obv
Sorry for the hi-jack Omni, but at some point they need to do what Numbz is saying by bringing together a rep (council?) from each of the major clans such as SYN, IMP, SI, GC, Zion, Hellstorm, KEQ, PFB, etc. Have a round table of reps to give FILTERED feedback on a consistent basis. |
Virex Staz
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
53
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 17:26:00 -
[17] - Quote
Rather than completely discarding the idea of the devs match (which at least gives the devs first hand experience of a top level battle with the current mechanics), why not change the format a bit to get the best of both?
Team A - Winners + Devs (2 squads of each?) Team B - The World + Devs (1 squad from each of the other top teams, 1 squad of devs?)
Form up both teams at least half an hour before match time to discuss tactics etc. and keep the teams together for a while after the match. This gives you the ability to discuss game issues with the devs with some real context. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 17:39:00 -
[18] - Quote
fahrenheitM wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Playing a match against the Dev's doesn't help advance the game. If we do play them they will most likely nerf what ever we used and buff the opposite. We get nowhere with that based off the last time the players faced the Dev's. It will just be more time wasted. Yes it would be fun to play and stomp the Dev's but I would rather give them useful insight and information on what needs to be done to help this game become balance for everybody.
Everybody knows that there is alot of imbalance in the game. Armor tanks are useless, turrets are to powerful, Logi's don't have a pro dominate role, nobody uses armor plates(except heavies), to small of armor reps for heavies, redline needs to be fix, etc, etc, etc. So much more to type about that needs adjusting.
To accuss us of not being for the players is stupid. We have players that are spec into every single role. this and tbh over the past few days on irc me and a few others from both SyN and Imp (noc and tiel) and even nova as well have been having good discussions on multiple fixes to swarms to sniping to armor etc it would be nice if the devs had a chat with ppl and not have to worry about wading through alot of the QQ feedback or just nonsense suggestions. quicker devs can seperate good feedback from the bad is the quicker the game can progress. They wont be able to please everyone obv Sorry for the hi-jack Omni, but at some point they need to do what Numbz is saying by bringing together a rep (council?) from each of the major clans such as SYN, IMP, SI, GC, Zion, Hellstorm, KEQ, PFB, etc. Have a round table of reps to give FILTERED feedback on a consistent basis.
in other words a DUST CSM |
ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
80
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 17:43:00 -
[19] - Quote
There is reason why the IMP don't play Corp matches, because the games just turn in red lines. For the first 1min I shoot my GUN, and then for the rest of the game I do sweet jumps in my LAV :D.
Why would we want to PUB-STOMP CCP, when we could use that time to fix the game. |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1032
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 17:45:00 -
[20] - Quote
I think it would be a great idea. Everyone knows we would redline devs and whats the point in that. I don't think that will help the game any either and could be counter productive.
As Omni said we have players spec'd into every role (I even wasted sp in logi this build :-() and think we could be a good representative of the player base. We are just trying to leverage our winning and the devs not wanting us to curb stomp them into something good for the game and community as a whole.
That said, I have no issue gathering questions ideas from the community and posting the dev responses afterward. |
|
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 18:09:00 -
[21] - Quote
I'd rather see you play 3 games against them like you did vs SI. I think they want to be shown how the dynamics of a game work at a competative level. Trouble is they'll never get out of their redline after 2 minutes :P
I'm really not keen on you guys having a silver tongue meeting. There's nothing you can't post here. I have the same opinion on the IRC, as so few people use it. SI has only recently acquired an IRC user. 1 from over 75 players. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1170
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 18:24:00 -
[22] - Quote
Winning the tournement proved Imperfects has the best combination of player and metagame skill. We can provide detailed feedback on WHY the game is not balancing as desired only possible with a real-time dialogue. I promise you that if this request is granted, we would push for more direct dev-playerbase focused communication. The template of CSM for DUST beta would satisfy this request. During a redline would distract the devs too much and color their bias agaist whatever we choose to use.
For a general overview of our position: The game needs to promote skill better. This means gun game and fitting synergy should trump SP. Vehicles and infantry should overlap less, strategic points need to be sturdier, multi-tiered and more diverse. Pages and pages of specific and general fixes made by inferring the intentions of CCP. Obviously we are all here hoping to be a part of something special, but the core mechanics are not working. More troubling, in some ways it is getting worse. Imagine how much more useful our feedback could be if CCP opens up to us about what kind of game they want to make. That is why we want to have a battle with the devs over mechanics and balance, instead of over pixel MCCs. |
Tiel Syysch
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
633
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 18:42:00 -
[23] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:I think they want to be shown how the dynamics of a game work at a competative level.
Theoretically they already saw that with the GMs spectating every match.
I would much rather speak with them to get an idea on where they envision things to be headed, and give input on where we feel things need to be changed. It's not an opportunity to lolbuff what we use to make us even stronger. People like myself and Noc pore over numbers and fitting styles to see it on paper, and then put them into use to see how that matches up.
Fun fact: Did you know right now under current mechanics, I could build a tank that did over 7000 damage (over 9100 to an armor target) each time I pressed R1? It's things like that that I want to see changed, that damage output is absurd. |
fahrenheitM
Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION
212
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 18:45:00 -
[24] - Quote
Tiel Syysch wrote:Tony Calif wrote:I think they want to be shown how the dynamics of a game work at a competative level. Theoretically they already saw that with the GMs spectating every match. I would much rather speak with them to get an idea on where they envision things to be headed, and give input on where we feel things need to be changed. It's not an opportunity to lolbuff what we use to make us even stronger. People like myself and Noc pore over numbers and fitting styles to see it on paper, and then put them into use to see how that matches up. Fun fact: Did you know right now under current mechanics, I could build a tank that did over 7000 damage (over 9100 to an armor target) each time I pressed R1? It's things like that that I want to see changed, that damage output is absurd.
As a spectator you see people shooting at each other. When you watch n00bs, you see people shooting at each other with less organization.
What you don't see as a spectator is a good comprehension of the precision and skill level the players are using (especially with aiming and moving in a firefight). |
steadyhand amarr
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
338
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 18:46:00 -
[25] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Winning the tournement proved Imperfects has the best combination of player and metagame skill. We can provide detailed feedback on WHY the game is not balancing as desired only possible with a real-time dialogue. I promise you that if this request is granted, we would push for more direct dev-playerbase focused communication. The template of CSM for DUST beta would satisfy this request. During a redline would distract the devs too much and color their bias agaist whatever we choose to use.
For a general overview of our position: The game needs to promote skill better. This means gun game and fitting synergy should trump SP. Vehicles and infantry should overlap less, strategic points need to be sturdier, multi-tiered and more diverse. Pages and pages of specific and general fixes made by inferring the intentions of CCP. Obviously we are all here hoping to be a part of something special, but the core mechanics are not working. More troubling, in some ways it is getting worse. Imagine how much more useful our feedback could be if CCP opens up to us about what kind of game they want to make. That is why we want to have a battle with the devs over mechanics and balance, instead of over pixel MCCs.
What noc said |
Paran Tadec
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
902
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 18:55:00 -
[26] - Quote
Even among all of our corp we have differnent ideas on balancing and fixes to be made. A chance to chat with decd instead of physically ruining them will provide them with valuable and varied feedback. |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1772
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 19:07:00 -
[27] - Quote
This idea is absurdly genius. Out of every corp around, Imperfects would have all the questions we'd want asked. I wanted to see the stream of devs getting dropship owned, but I can miss out on that for some Q&A.
Make sure to ask them how they plan to add RTS style to the game and when to the beta. Shooting is fun, but commanding is addictive :3 |
crazy space
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
879
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 19:18:00 -
[28] - Quote
Why not Just all be on voice chat during the matches? Make a custom channel and all join it ?
Also your in a fun position to black mail the devs. They won't chat? Then just sit in the red zone, don't fire a shot untill they have a talk with you. They won't annonuce unlock 4/5 with news you didn't fight back. Your currently the best of the best. |
Captain-Awesome
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
349
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 19:50:00 -
[29] - Quote
I'm going to give an unbiased point of view here.
we could red line them with anything, that wouldn't show them what is working and what isn't, once you've red lined a team as a forge gunner, all you do is sit there and pop off the odd RDV. They won't learn anything from that.
chatting in irc: not all of us go there, zitro for example hasn't been there in a while and on top of that we are only specc'd mostly in our primary roles, so our opinion is biased to our role on the field and we cannot talk about everything available.
The forums: nice, but they get completely trashed and we don't get the feedback from the devs to listen to / counter their opinion, which is the real eye opener.
yes it would be awesome to have direct questions answered but this is as much for the devs as it is for us, sure we won a competition, but devs want to have lolz too.
If I was to ask anything from CCP, it would be if it was possible to make statistical changes separate from actual build changes (which include bug fixes) as this seems to be the main thing that throws everything out of whack. a fix on anything improves it that much more, and disrupts the entire order, so the consideration of buffing it should be reconsidered, if anything that was making it (or anything else) underpowered is now resolved. |
Kain Spero
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
898
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 19:54:00 -
[30] - Quote
crazy space wrote:Why not Just all be on voice chat during the matches? Make a custom channel and all join it ?
Also your in a fun position to black mail the devs. They won't chat? Then just sit in the red zone, don't fire a shot untill they have a talk with you. They won't annonuce unlock 4/5 with news you didn't fight back. Your currently the best of the best.
Honestly, this is just a friendly request to jump in a channel with the Devs and give feedback and talk about the game. If the Devs end up wanting to do the match instead that's fine. We're just thinking a feedback session could prove a lot more useful. Hopefully it would actually be easier to get more Dev involvement in something like this since people could show up from Eve or Dust and talk in the same channel.
Compiling questions and feedback from the community before the talk would be a big plus. |
|
Tyrus 4
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
83
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 19:58:00 -
[31] - Quote
I'm not an Imperfect, but I wholeheartedly support this idea. |
FPS LEGEND
Doomheim
100
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 20:00:00 -
[32] - Quote
Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Imperfects would be interested in doing a feedback/input session in game instead of the Dev's dust match. In the voice session we can ask questions and give feedback/input. We feel this will be more valuable than playing a much against you guys. It will give you the Dev's valuable information to help make Dust 514 a better game for the whole community.
CCP please reply to acknowledge if this is possible or not. Thank you!
Only if your CEO is willing to give me their Autographed Poster ;) |
Captain-Awesome
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
349
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 20:07:00 -
[33] - Quote
FPS LEGEND wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Imperfects would be interested in doing a feedback/input session in game instead of the Dev's dust match. In the voice session we can ask questions and give feedback/input. We feel this will be more valuable than playing a much against you guys. It will give you the Dev's valuable information to help make Dust 514 a better game for the whole community.
CCP please reply to acknowledge if this is possible or not. Thank you!
Only if your CEO is willing to give me their Autographed Poster ;)
he is the CEO lol |
yavor theskillless
15
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 20:19:00 -
[34] - Quote
FPS LEGEND wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Imperfects would be interested in doing a feedback/input session in game instead of the Dev's dust match. In the voice session we can ask questions and give feedback/input. We feel this will be more valuable than playing a much against you guys. It will give you the Dev's valuable information to help make Dust 514 a better game for the whole community.
CCP please reply to acknowledge if this is possible or not. Thank you!
Only if your CEO is willing to give me their Autographed Poster ;)
lol. posters now? wtf did real esports get to? and i dont mean ut and the lightweights. ask gabe he'll tell you. i blocked him last week :( |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
404
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 20:21:00 -
[35] - Quote
It's a great idea, Omni. I'd feel(more or less) comfortable with you guys representing the community. I think the session would be most valuable if the minutes were posted for the community. The smartest person in the room is everybody, after all.....
I'd like to improve on your idea - do both. And have the match first. Have a debrief after that. More valuable and more fun.
And if I could make one more request - don't beat them with gun game. It will add weight to your arguments by demonstrating imbalances or issues in the design of DUST, rather than detracting from your arguments because your group might be perceived as a special case.
Good luck. |
yavor theskillless
15
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 20:25:00 -
[36] - Quote
yeah good luck:P |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1032
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 22:29:00 -
[37] - Quote
Vrain Matari wrote:It's a great idea, Omni. I'd feel(more or less) comfortable with you guys representing the community. I think the session would be most valuable if the minutes were posted for the community. The smartest person in the room is everybody, after all.....
I'd like to improve on your idea - do both. And have the match first. Have a debrief after that. More valuable and more fun.
And if I could make one more request - don't beat them with gun game. It will add weight to your arguments by demonstrating imbalances or issues in the design of DUST, rather than detracting from your arguments because your group might be perceived as a special case.
Good luck.
I like the idea of both. play a few matches with total war then infantry only so they can see first hand how things are. Then talk about things
Just like Zion was able to talk to Wang on podside chat was great for all of us not just Zionshad TCD. We are trying leverage our tourny victory into something that will benefit the entire dust community.
If we do get a conversation we would share it the information with all. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 23:38:00 -
[38] - Quote
Issue here is....from all of the posts, I've never seen two different imps with 2 different opinions. The lot has just liked and agreed on everything the other has said.
Which makes sense because they're in the same corp and will most likely agree with each other since they converse amongst each other. Also, they are an elite team which has a different experience than casuals and randoms. The game is different to them. A rich guy can't tell you what it is like to be poor.
So, although I support this idea & think it is an awesome one...I think the imps should use their win to ask for guys from different corps and a random or two for the Q&A session. That way, they'll get the opinion that truly represents the entire player base. |
Tiel Syysch
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
633
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 23:44:00 -
[39] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Issue here is....from all of the posts, I've never seen two different imps with 2 different opinions. The lot has just liked and agreed on everything the other has said. .
Do you know why? Because we discuss things before we post them, and when we've got the consensus on a finalized idea, then it is posted. Everyone has shaped the idea together, so of course we agree on it. They hardly start out with 100% all thinking the initial proposition is perfect just because one of us said it.
If you want to see opposition to an idea, get Telc involved in one of our discussions about tanks. |
Omnipotens Zitro
Doomheim
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 00:01:00 -
[40] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Issue here is....from all of the posts, I've never seen two different imps with 2 different opinions. The lot has just liked and agreed on everything the other has said.
Which makes sense because they're in the same corp and will most likely agree with each other since they converse amongst each other. Also, they are an elite team which has a different experience than casuals and randoms. The game is different to them. A rich guy can't tell you what it is like to be poor.
So, although I support this idea & think it is an awesome one...I think the imps should use their win to ask for guys from different corps and a random or two for the Q&A session. That way, they'll get the opinion that truly represents the entire player base. I asked everybody with in the corp if they would like to do this before I posted. Not everybody wanted to do this but an over welming majority said that they would like to see this happen. CCP nothin and myself had an agreement from before that we will face each other 1v1. I would rather help the community as a whole than just be selfish and have the Dev battle.
Accussing us to be rich and high minding is insulting. Many of us play smart with our isk and resources. Some of us just play in militia gear to earn money. All of us donate money to each other to help our fellow mates. We have felt the pains of soloing during a battle and as a squad.
|
|
steadyhand amarr
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
338
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 00:06:00 -
[41] - Quote
i was gonna say better example would be noc and alldin :P imperfects argue a lot, and we sometimes clash but by out very nature its a better say it then keep quite so everyone view is considered which is why we are so solid so you should here us wide up omni sometimes i swear we were so close to breaking him last week :P.
tbh as we have a love hate relationship with this game. we love this game and the game is doing to best to make us hate it. so we really want a chance to get in some good solid feedback so everyone can enjoy we need more targets to shoot at tbb |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 00:13:00 -
[42] - Quote
The problem is CCP should see the discussion, not just the final idea. If CCP want to do it then that's cool, Don't take this the wrong way, but I haven't seen a thread about how you get 7000 damage from a HAV. I really havent been checking feedback side of thing much though, so might have missed it. The secret secret side of things isn't right for a beta. The tournament gave people who had found exploits or a broken mechanic, no reason to suggest something was wrong.
I suggest playing a game WITH the Devs. Actually have them play as the assault guys/tanker. Let them Devhack to 5-6mil SP, and skill how you advise. And explain WHY. Treat them as total noobs. Make them better players, with a better understanding of the how & why of FPS. That'd be far better. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 00:18:00 -
[43] - Quote
.. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 00:30:00 -
[44] - Quote
Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Issue here is....from all of the posts, I've never seen two different imps with 2 different opinions. The lot has just liked and agreed on everything the other has said.
Which makes sense because they're in the same corp and will most likely agree with each other since they converse amongst each other. Also, they are an elite team which has a different experience than casuals and randoms. The game is different to them. A rich guy can't tell you what it is like to be poor.
So, although I support this idea & think it is an awesome one...I think the imps should use their win to ask for guys from different corps and a random or two for the Q&A session. That way, they'll get the opinion that truly represents the entire player base. I asked everybody with in the corp if they would like to do this before I posted. Not everybody wanted to do this but an over welming majority said that they would like to see this happen. CCP nothin and myself had an agreement from before that we will face each other 1v1. I would rather help the community as a whole than just be selfish and have the Dev battle. Accussing us to be rich and high minding is insulting. Many of us play smart with our isk and resources. Some of us just play in militia gear to earn money. All of us donate money to each other to help our fellow mates. We have felt the pains of soloing during a battle and as a squad.
I didn't accuse you guys of being rich and high minding.....I used that statement as an analogy. Its the same as saying you can't ask a girl what its like to be a boy. You guys are an elite corp, so you guys don't have the pains of a random. Your corp's average wlr is over a 3, I believe.
My point is you guys represent your collective thoughts only. It wouldn't be fair for one corp to represent everyone's interest...not even mine. Because we share similar views.
|
Stormy Geddon
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
39
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 00:38:00 -
[45] - Quote
I love how it's taken for granted that we'll red line the Devs right off the bat.
Then they roll out in Jovian teleportation drop suits with 3000 shield and 2000 armor and happen to implement cloaking devices right before the match. Stop poking the guys who write the code.
We're all talking about a fake world where they have God powers. Keep talking crap and you'll log in and all your drop suits will be neon pink and your guns will shoot dandelions. They can do that.
Or you really **** them off and they bring back the INVALID glitch, but just for you.
I love the CSM idea, so here is the first endorsement:
Zitro brothers for DUST CSM President and VP. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 00:48:00 -
[46] - Quote
Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Issue here is....from all of the posts, I've never seen two different imps with 2 different opinions. The lot has just liked and agreed on everything the other has said.
Which makes sense because they're in the same corp and will most likely agree with each other since they converse amongst each other. Also, they are an elite team which has a different experience than casuals and randoms. The game is different to them. A rich guy can't tell you what it is like to be poor.
So, although I support this idea & think it is an awesome one...I think the imps should use their win to ask for guys from different corps and a random or two for the Q&A session. That way, they'll get the opinion that truly represents the entire player base. I asked everybody with in the corp if they would like to do this before I posted. Not everybody wanted to do this but an over welming majority said that they would like to see this happen. CCP nothin and myself had an agreement from before that we will face each other 1v1. I would rather help the community as a whole than just be selfish and have the Dev battle. Accussing us to be rich and high minding is insulting. Many of us play smart with our isk and resources. Some of us just play in militia gear to earn money. All of us donate money to each other to help our fellow mates. We have felt the pains of soloing during a battle and as a squad.
I didn't accuse you guys of being rich and high minding.....I used that statement as an analogy. Its the same as saying you can't ask a girl what its like to be a boy. You guys are an elite corp, so you guys don't have the pains of a random. Your corp's average wlr is over a 3, I believe.
My point is you guys represent your collective thoughts only. It wouldn't be fair for one corp to represent everyone's interest...not even mine. Because we share similar views.
|
Tiel Syysch
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
633
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 00:57:00 -
[47] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:The problem is CCP should see the discussion, not just the final idea. If CCP want to do it then that's cool, Don't take this the wrong way, but I haven't seen a thread about how you get 7000 damage from a HAV. I really havent been checking feedback side of thing much though, so might have missed it. The secret secret side of things isn't right for a beta. The tournament gave people who had found exploits or a broken mechanic, no reason to suggest something was wrong.
I suggest playing a game WITH the Devs. Actually have them play as the assault guys/tanker. Let them Devhack to 5-6mil SP, and skill how you advise. And explain WHY. Treat them as total noobs. Make them better players, with a better understanding of the how & why of FPS. That'd be far better.
They do get to see the discussion many times. It's more captured in the why something is a problem and why the proposed solution will fix that problem. Whenever I catch a dev on IRC and bring up an issue with them, it's generally me filling their screen with text explaining everything and not just saying "fix x y and z."
I don't post things like that on the forums because I don't want to see them in-game (I haven't built that particular tank and "abused" it myself, by the way, I just know it's possible. I also can't do it even if I wanted to, as it would take a lot more SP than I currently have since I spec'd in other things instead of pushing for that). I send those kinds of amazingly broken things into the devs in private, though. The only other person outside of CCP that I had told the specific build to was Noc, who also can't build that particular fit, but we talk about balance all the time together and run numbers on things to see what kind of lol-worthy things we can theoretically make with the current build.
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:My point is you guys represent your collective thoughts only. It wouldn't be fair for one corp to represent everyone's interest...not even mine. Because we share similar views.
That's what anybody does, though. It would have to have everybody present to represent all views really, because people generally don't argue for your view if they feel it should be implemented differently (though we do have people who often propose multiple solutions to the same problem, as long as they're legitimate solutions anyway, not things like "take out tanks because I keep dying to them"). That's not to say we ignore the issues everyone wants. We have a lot of people who comb over the forums all the time and know all the major issues everyone is having with the game at any given time. We may differ on how we'd like to see them resolved, but we wouldn't ignore the issue entirely because it's not an "elite person's problem" or something. The major issues affect us all.
I wouldn't mind collecting issues people wanted brought up if they decide to let us do this, and I'd do my best to represent it in the way you intended, but I'll also throw in my suggestion regarding it if I feel it should be different. This all hinges on the amount of time that would be available for something like this, though. |
Omnipotens Zitro
Doomheim
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 01:00:00 -
[48] - Quote
I believe there should be a Dust CSM. If another corp won the tourney and suggested this idea. I would fully support it without question. I wouldn't cry on the forums saying that they are doing it for personal gain and don't have the interest of the community. I also wouldn't suggest there be a representative from every corp either as the winning corp rightfully won the tourney. I would congratulate them for coming up with something better than having a pointless Dev battle that would achieve nothing.
Like come on guys! We still in beta! BETA! There is no politics or advantages trying to gain in having a feedback and input session with the Dev's. Like seriously, if any other corp would of won, nobody would object to it. To object this is saying that you don't have the community in mind and are only worried about yourself and your corp. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 01:07:00 -
[49] - Quote
Stormy Geddon wrote:you'll log in and all your drop suits will be neon pink and your guns will shoot dandelions. I know a few people who would probably quite enjoy themselves if that happened.
Especially during a tournament or corp match. |
Nova Knife
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
784
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 01:10:00 -
[50] - Quote
Tiel Syysch wrote:If you want to see opposition to an idea, get Telc involved in one of our discussions about tanks.
Oh god. Anyone who does not hang out on the IRC does not understand the pain the above statement brings.
Also, sit-down with the devs is a nice idea. The above concerns are valid though. While I can vouch that most of the Imperfects would not simply go to CCP and say "You need to buff X" where X is something they exclusively use. They have a pretty solid understanding of what is broken with the game and do have pretty good ideas on how to put stuff on track to being awesome again. If this was to be productive on a large scale, it would need to be several hours long or done over the course of several days to ensure every topic got discussed as much as deserved, because if the live Q&A's are any indication, they usually only set aside an hour or so for stuff like this. And that simply will not cut it, IMO.
Though, while their ideas are good, the concerns about a single groups' viewpoints being heard are somewhat valid. On that note though... I do not think that an eve-style CSM would work for dust. Eve CSM is election based... and if forum likes are any indication the 'popular' people are definitely not the best people for the job. You see people who post garbage with thousands of likes, and goodposters with barely any :P
IF there was any sort of Dust CSM, I would personally prefer that the members be chosen by CCP. Or at least... The candidates being chosen by CCP from goodposters they notice! Allowing anyone to make themselves eligible is just a recipe for getting a bad CSM, IMO.
Keeping that in mind, the EVE CSM doesn't really work as a whole for dust, regardless. The EVE CSM meets maybe once a month or two, AFAIK. The playerbase for dust is potentially going to be much larger than EVE's. Having a dozen or so people represent all of those? Kinda meh.
I'd personally prefer a more open format. On X date there is a roundtable about Y topic(s), for example. Anyone can join this roundtable and offer feedback. This will of course mean that a lot of bad ideas will float around along with the good ones, but that's the point of discussion. Seeing multiple sides of something is a lot more valuable to design than just hearing "Hey guys do X" even if X is definitely the best choice, and they do it anyways! |
|
Ops Fox
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
197
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 01:22:00 -
[51] - Quote
I rather hesistant to say hey go a head and rep. ALL of us just about everyone has different opinions on every issue and like you said your corp is externally single minded in its opinion well yeah yall may argue within your own chat that doesnt change the fact that the ideas of your group might be different from everyone else why should we let a small elite get auch an extreme amount of talk time with devs.
As for a dust csm we need one and I do think all the major corps should get one rep. On this csm with maybe a popular elected blueberry on there as well. However no president or single more important member thats the kind of mind set from yall I fear |
Paran Tadec
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
902
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 01:24:00 -
[52] - Quote
Thats why they are elected. And theres a thing called skype...
No trollin I promise |
Ops Fox
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
197
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 01:26:00 -
[53] - Quote
Who says we need to do a eve style CSM we are pur own group why should we have a "popular" election? Why not let every major corp ceo elected a memeber from thier corp to represent them and let the blueberrys have one popularly elected rep./ pres. |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1032
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 01:30:00 -
[54] - Quote
elected csm in dust would be horrible idea right now. Long term I reserve my opinion for another day. I would rather have ccp choose.
To many people just play 1 thing and cry nerf or aren't good at the game and therefore extremely biased.
With all honesty the player base in general in beta is average at best and loathe the idea of a casual player that goes 3/9 every match getting a say when it's their skill, abilites, understanding not the game that contributes to their success.
|
Tiel Syysch
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
633
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 01:33:00 -
[55] - Quote
Ops Fox wrote:Who says we need to do a eve style CSM we are pur own group why should we have a "popular" election? Why not let every major corp ceo elected a memeber from thier corp to represent them and let the blueberrys have one popularly elected rep./ pres.
Who's to say what a "major" corp is? And you don't have to be in one to have good ideas or be rational about things, conversely just because you're in one doesn't mean your input would be worthwhile.
Regardless, this thread isn't about a Dust CSM. Go make a thread on that if you want (or find one of the existing ones, I know there are a few). |
Ops Fox
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
197
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 02:31:00 -
[56] - Quote
Tiel Syysch wrote:Ops Fox wrote:Who says we need to do a eve style CSM we are pur own group why should we have a "popular" election? Why not let every major corp ceo elected a memeber from thier corp to represent them and let the blueberrys have one popularly elected rep./ pres. Who's to say what a "major" corp is? And you don't have to be in one to have good ideas or be rational about things, conversely just because you're in one doesn't mean your input would be worthwhile. Regardless, this thread isn't about a Dust CSM. Go make a thread on that if you want (or find one of the existing ones, I know there are a few).
As for whats a great power its a little subjective but " There are no set or defined characteristics of a great power. These characteristics have often been treated as empirical, self-evident to the assessor" -wiki thats a general idea. "[major] powers characteristically possess military and economic strength and diplomatic and soft power influence which may cause-á[lesser] powers to consider the opinions of [major] powers before" -wiki tgis is a little more defined.
If you got the ability to wage war and hold your own then you count most of yousimi finals and up tourny goers with betamax and tritan included.
I did say the blueberrys get a pres. |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2046
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 03:01:00 -
[57] - Quote
+1 would rather have a chat with the Devs than I would just redlining and/or cloning them. If they bring out dev hacks then that would just be annoying -_- |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 03:23:00 -
[58] - Quote
Omnipotens Zitro wrote:I believe there should be a Dust CSM. If another corp won the tourney and suggested this idea. I would fully support it without question. I wouldn't cry on the forums saying that they are doing it for personal gain and don't have the interest of the community. I also wouldn't suggest there be a representative from every corp either as the winning corp rightfully won the tourney. I would congratulate them for coming up with something better than having a pointless Dev battle that would achieve nothing.
Like come on guys! We still in beta! BETA! There is no politics or advantages trying to gain in having a feedback and input session with the Dev's. Like seriously, if any other corp would of won, nobody would object to it. To object this is saying that you don't have the community in mind and are only worried about yourself and your corp.
Noone is against the idea. Whether it is the Imperfects or a 3 man newbie corp...it doesn't matter. One corp should not be the only voice because they are internally biased. I suggest that you use your win and try and negotiate a Q&A with a few scattered and well-rounded panel of testers instead of just players from one corp. |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1772
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 03:40:00 -
[59] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote:I believe there should be a Dust CSM. If another corp won the tourney and suggested this idea. I would fully support it without question. I wouldn't cry on the forums saying that they are doing it for personal gain and don't have the interest of the community. I also wouldn't suggest there be a representative from every corp either as the winning corp rightfully won the tourney. I would congratulate them for coming up with something better than having a pointless Dev battle that would achieve nothing.
Like come on guys! We still in beta! BETA! There is no politics or advantages trying to gain in having a feedback and input session with the Dev's. Like seriously, if any other corp would of won, nobody would object to it. To object this is saying that you don't have the community in mind and are only worried about yourself and your corp. Noone is against the idea. Whether it is the Imperfects or a 3 man newbie corp...it doesn't matter. One corp should not be the only voice because they are internally biased. I suggest that you use your win and try and negotiate a Q&A with a few scattered and well-rounded panel of testers instead of just players from one corp. I think people are being mis-lead on what's being said. Imperfect have won the right to play the devs, and have instead asked for a Q&A. What right does anyone else have to say anything about it? Who cares if there's better people who can ask better questions. Imperfects won this opportunity, give 'em suggestions incase they get there wish. And congradulations to Imperfects, you kittenholes. |
Ima Leet
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
321
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 07:05:00 -
[60] - Quote
Omnipotens Zitro wrote:I believe there should be a Dust CSM. If another corp won the tourney and suggested this idea. I would fully support it without question. I wouldn't cry on the forums saying that they are doing it for personal gain and don't have the interest of the community. I also wouldn't suggest there be a representative from every corp either as the winning corp rightfully won the tourney. I would congratulate them for coming up with something better than having a pointless Dev battle that would achieve nothing.
Like come on guys! We still in beta! BETA! There is no politics or advantages trying to gain in having a feedback and input session with the Dev's. Like seriously, if any other corp would of won, nobody would object to it. To object this is saying that you don't have the community in mind and are only worried about yourself and your corp. QFT +1
If anyone has any questions they want to ask, ask it here, this is the thread we can direct them to. |
|
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1032
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 07:51:00 -
[61] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote:I believe there should be a Dust CSM. If another corp won the tourney and suggested this idea. I would fully support it without question. I wouldn't cry on the forums saying that they are doing it for personal gain and don't have the interest of the community. I also wouldn't suggest there be a representative from every corp either as the winning corp rightfully won the tourney. I would congratulate them for coming up with something better than having a pointless Dev battle that would achieve nothing.
Like come on guys! We still in beta! BETA! There is no politics or advantages trying to gain in having a feedback and input session with the Dev's. Like seriously, if any other corp would of won, nobody would object to it. To object this is saying that you don't have the community in mind and are only worried about yourself and your corp. Noone is against the idea. Whether it is the Imperfects or a 3 man newbie corp...it doesn't matter. One corp should not be the only voice because they are internally biased. I suggest that you use your win and try and negotiate a Q&A with a few scattered and well-rounded panel of testers instead of just players from one corp. I think people are being mis-lead on what's being said. Imperfect have won the right to play the devs, and have instead asked for a Q&A. What right does anyone else have to say anything about it? Who cares if there's better people who can ask better questions. Imperfects won this opportunity, give 'em suggestions incase they get there wish. And congradulations to Imperfects, you kittenholes.
We won and will redline devs if we must but would rather use it to communicate with devs. If we get it a Q&A I would be happy to start suggested question thread and report back the answer to the community.
/me thinks the SoTa PoP guy gets it |
Ty 'SweetCheeks' Borg
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
192
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 11:45:00 -
[62] - Quote
Tiel Syysch wrote:Tony Calif wrote:The problem is CCP should see the discussion, not just the final idea. If CCP want to do it then that's cool, Don't take this the wrong way, but I haven't seen a thread about how you get 7000 damage from a HAV. I really havent been checking feedback side of thing much though, so might have missed it. The secret secret side of things isn't right for a beta. The tournament gave people who had found exploits or a broken mechanic, no reason to suggest something was wrong.
I suggest playing a game WITH the Devs. Actually have them play as the assault guys/tanker. Let them Devhack to 5-6mil SP, and skill how you advise. And explain WHY. Treat them as total noobs. Make them better players, with a better understanding of the how & why of FPS. That'd be far better. They do get to see the discussion many times. It's more captured in the why something is a problem and why the proposed solution will fix that problem. Whenever I catch a dev on IRC and bring up an issue with them, it's generally me filling their screen with text explaining everything and not just saying "fix x y and z." I don't post things like that on the forums because I don't want to see them in-game (I haven't built that particular tank and "abused" it myself, by the way, I just know it's possible. I also can't do it even if I wanted to, as it would take a lot more SP than I currently have since I spec'd in other things instead of pushing for that). I send those kinds of amazingly broken things into the devs in private, though. The only other person outside of CCP that I had told the specific build to was Noc, who also can't build that particular fit, but we talk about balance all the time together and run numbers on things to see what kind of lol-worthy things we can theoretically make with the current build.
Wait so your saying you knew something was horribly broken but have yet STILL to post on it and make it public?. You do get the idea of beta right?. Your supposed to be showing the community and the devs that something is broken, not hiding it and keeping it to yourself. Sure do that once the game is finished, but if something's broken the world should know about it.
Take what happened with the WP farming as an example. Sha and I figured that out and abused the crap out of it for a few days in plain sight, the public saw it complained and we admitted it was broken. We then saw a tonne of people doing it and the devs put a stop to it, (albeit slowly). In your logic we should of just kep doing it and whispered in the devs ear when nobody was about that it was broken. Do you see how wrong that is?, yet we're expected to like the idea of you speaking to the devs about balance and such?.
I'm fairly sure I know what your talking about with HAV's as things just didn't add up fighting against your tanks, I'm fairly certain the skills stacking are totally broken and combined with damage mods being broken we end up with around 220% damage or something?. Now I've not tested, run the numbers or proved this, yet you seem to have and haven't posted about it?. We even had a thread discussing it before the match if it's the case and you didn't comment.
Redline the devs and form a community council from all CEO's involved at every stage in the tourney imo. I know it's only a request your making, but the posts you've made in this thread prove you can be biased towards your own gains. It also sounds like your already discussing things 1on 1 with the devs anyway in IRC, so why need this?.
I'm starting to think this is a troll thread tbh. |
Alldin Kan
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
169
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 16:10:00 -
[63] - Quote
Super Tank - a tank that is given four or more broken damage mods to large turrets in order to have a damage output of over 5000, preferred tanks for this are the Madrugar, Surya, and Chakram (<- I'm getting this last one btw). |
Omnipotens Zitro
Doomheim
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 16:29:00 -
[64] - Quote
Ty 'SweetCheeks' Borg wrote:Tiel Syysch wrote:Tony Calif wrote:The problem is CCP should see the discussion, not just the final idea. If CCP want to do it then that's cool, Don't take this the wrong way, but I haven't seen a thread about how you get 7000 damage from a HAV. I really havent been checking feedback side of thing much though, so might have missed it. The secret secret side of things isn't right for a beta. The tournament gave people who had found exploits or a broken mechanic, no reason to suggest something was wrong.
I suggest playing a game WITH the Devs. Actually have them play as the assault guys/tanker. Let them Devhack to 5-6mil SP, and skill how you advise. And explain WHY. Treat them as total noobs. Make them better players, with a better understanding of the how & why of FPS. That'd be far better. They do get to see the discussion many times. It's more captured in the why something is a problem and why the proposed solution will fix that problem. Whenever I catch a dev on IRC and bring up an issue with them, it's generally me filling their screen with text explaining everything and not just saying "fix x y and z." I don't post things like that on the forums because I don't want to see them in-game (I haven't built that particular tank and "abused" it myself, by the way, I just know it's possible. I also can't do it even if I wanted to, as it would take a lot more SP than I currently have since I spec'd in other things instead of pushing for that). I send those kinds of amazingly broken things into the devs in private, though. The only other person outside of CCP that I had told the specific build to was Noc, who also can't build that particular fit, but we talk about balance all the time together and run numbers on things to see what kind of lol-worthy things we can theoretically make with the current build. Wait so your saying you knew something was horribly broken but have yet STILL to post on it and make it public?. You do get the idea of beta right?. Your supposed to be showing the community and the devs that something is broken, not hiding it and keeping it to yourself. Sure do that once the game is finished, but if something's broken the world should know about it. Take what happened with the WP farming as an example. Sha and I figured that out and abused the crap out of it for a few days in plain sight, the public saw it complained and we admitted it was broken. We then saw a tonne of people doing it and the devs put a stop to it, (albeit slowly). In your logic we should of just kep doing it and whispered in the devs ear when nobody was about that it was broken. Do you see how wrong that is?, yet we're expected to like the idea of you speaking to the devs about balance and such?. I'm fairly sure I know what your talking about with HAV's as things just didn't add up fighting against your tanks, I'm fairly certain the skills stacking are totally broken and combined with damage mods being broken we end up with around 220% damage or something?. Now I've not tested, run the numbers or proved this, yet you seem to have and haven't posted about it?. We even had a thread discussing it before the match if it's the case and you didn't comment. Redline the devs and form a community council from all CEO's involved at every stage in the tourney imo. I know it's only a request your making, but the posts you've made in this thread prove you can be biased towards your own gains. It also sounds like your already discussing things 1on 1 with the devs anyway in IRC, so why need this?. I'm starting to think this is a troll thread tbh. Oh I'm sorry we don't post things on the forums for everybody to see and abuse. I forget we directly talk to the Dev's in IRC. They already know as we keep the Devs updated on broken stuff. I'm sorry we take a more direct approach in doing things. We like thing done properly.
All I'm seeing is SI QQ'ing. Expected from a bunch of sore losers. Tbqh.
|
Sir Meode
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
317
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 16:31:00 -
[65] - Quote
What the imperfect a are suggesting is an awesome idea, it could greatly speed up the beta process and the devs would learn far more from that sort of thing than being facerolled in a battle, however taking feedback from one Corperation is not such a good idea. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 16:34:00 -
[66] - Quote
Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Ty 'SweetCheeks' Borg wrote:Your supposed to be showing the community and the devs that something is broken, not hiding it and keeping it to yourself. Oh I'm sorry we don't post things on the forums for everybody to see and abuse. I forget we directly talk to the Dev's in IRC. They already know as we keep the Devs updated on broken stuff. I'm sorry we take a more direct approach in doing things. We like thing done properly. All I'm seeing is SI QQ'ing. Expected from a bunch of sore losers. Tbqh. Just cutting down and emphasising with bold the part where you seem to be missing his point. |
Omnipotens Zitro
Doomheim
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 16:49:00 -
[67] - Quote
Sir Meode wrote:What the imperfect a are suggesting is an awesome idea, it could greatly speed up the beta process and the devs would learn far more from that sort of thing than being facerolled in a battle, however taking feedback from one Corperation is not such a good idea.
Ohhh nooo's!! There's so much to gain from a beta!! We will solidify our hold on null and FW! Ohhh wait! We are still in CLOSED BETA!!! Also there isn't anything to capture and hold. FACEDESK
Ohhh nooo's!! We are going to make this game infantry only!! That's such an amazing idea to alienate our HAV, Dropship, heavies, logi's, LAV, swarms, grenades and everything else users!!! FACEDESK
Ohhh nooo's!! We are a collective single mind! Nobody has a will and have different varying ideas and solutions for everything! FACEDESK
You see what I'm saying? We have nothing to gain from this. The community as a whole gains from this. This can easily fix a build of fixes.
We have players in every single role in the game who are the best of the best and know what the hell they are talking about it. We have years of experience playing FPS and other games at a high competitive level and at a casual level.
Who would you want to help give feedback? The players who hardly play the game and does not understand the concept of how thing should work? Or the players who have religiously played a certain role, knows all the ins and outs, and understands what is CCP trying to achieve?
Most of Imperfects have been here before the closed beta was even open. |
Ty 'SweetCheeks' Borg
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
192
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 17:03:00 -
[68] - Quote
Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Oh I'm sorry we don't post things on the forums for everybody to see and abuse. I forget we directly talk to the Dev's in IRC. They already know as we keep the Devs updated on broken stuff. I'm sorry we take a more direct approach in doing things. We like thing done properly. All I'm seeing is SI QQ'ing. Expected from a bunch of sore losers. Tbqh.
You say this?, really?. So this thread was just a pathetic attempt to troll everyone about how you won?. Bravo. I expected nothing less tbh.
If you really gave a **** and this wasn't just some attempt to boost your ego, you'd of read my post for what it's worth, but you failed to even do that lol. Alldin responded in a correct manner, you responded like a tard.
All you read is QQ, but that's why you posted this thread anyway isn't it?. Pathetic tbh. I thought trolling was breaking the rules?, where's Regnum we need him to clarify it seems!
We're not sore losers at all, your just terrible winners it seems.
|
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1772
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 17:06:00 -
[69] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote:I believe there should be a Dust CSM. If another corp won the tourney and suggested this idea. I would fully support it without question. I wouldn't cry on the forums saying that they are doing it for personal gain and don't have the interest of the community. I also wouldn't suggest there be a representative from every corp either as the winning corp rightfully won the tourney. I would congratulate them for coming up with something better than having a pointless Dev battle that would achieve nothing.
Like come on guys! We still in beta! BETA! There is no politics or advantages trying to gain in having a feedback and input session with the Dev's. Like seriously, if any other corp would of won, nobody would object to it. To object this is saying that you don't have the community in mind and are only worried about yourself and your corp. Noone is against the idea. Whether it is the Imperfects or a 3 man newbie corp...it doesn't matter. One corp should not be the only voice because they are internally biased. I suggest that you use your win and try and negotiate a Q&A with a few scattered and well-rounded panel of testers instead of just players from one corp. I think people are being mis-lead on what's being said. Imperfect have won the right to play the devs, and have instead asked for a Q&A. What right does anyone else have to say anything about it? Who cares if there's better people who can ask better questions. Imperfects won this opportunity, give 'em suggestions incase they get there wish. And congradulations to Imperfects, you kittenholes.
Can this topic get locked now please. It's turning into a flame wars of who knows what more, and tbh, no one gives a flaming kitten. Imperfects won, help them come up with good questions, and stfu.
Thanks for seeing things logically. Now let's discuss the worst bug this game has and other things that could said to the devs, or ideas and implements. But mostly, Imperfects, point out how bad there maps are. That A, B, C, map is terribad with forge and snipers running to mountain tops too far away for most to deal with. |
EGOMAN VIV
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
20
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 17:14:00 -
[70] - Quote
Omnipotens Zitro wrote: Ohhh nooo's!! There's so much to gain from a beta!! We will solidify our hold on null and FW! Ohhh wait! We are still in CLOSED BETA!!! Also there isn't anything to capture and hold. FACEDESK
Ohhh nooo's!! We are going to make this game infantry only!! That's such an amazing idea to alienate our HAV, Dropship, heavies, logi's, LAV, swarms, grenades and everything else users!!! FACEDESK
Ohhh nooo's!! We are a collective single mind! Nobody has a will and have different varying ideas and solutions for everything! FACEDESK
You see what I'm saying? We have nothing to gain from this. The community as a whole gains from this. This can easily fix a build of fixes.
We have players in every single role in the game who are the best of the best and know what the hell they are talking about it. We have years of experience playing FPS and other games at a high competitive level and at a casual level.
Who would you want to help give feedback? The players who hardly play the game and does not understand the concept of how thing should work? Or the players who have religiously played a certain role, knows all the ins and outs, and understands what is CCP trying to achieve?
Most of Imperfects have been here before the closed beta was even open.
lol U MAD Omni? HTFU dude its only a game :/ |
|
Omnipotens Zitro
Doomheim
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 17:18:00 -
[71] - Quote
Ty 'SweetCheeks' Borg wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Oh I'm sorry we don't post things on the forums for everybody to see and abuse. I forget we directly talk to the Dev's in IRC. They already know as we keep the Devs updated on broken stuff. I'm sorry we take a more direct approach in doing things. We like thing done properly. All I'm seeing is SI QQ'ing. Expected from a bunch of sore losers. Tbqh. You say this?, really?. So this thread was just a pathetic attempt to troll everyone about how you won?. Bravo. I expected nothing less tbh. If you really gave a **** and this wasn't just some attempt to boost your ego, you'd of read my post for what it's worth, but you failed to even do that lol. Alldin responded in a correct manner, you responded like a tard. All you read is QQ, but that's why you posted this thread anyway isn't it?. Pathetic tbh. I thought trolling was breaking the rules?, where's Regnum we need him to clarify it seems! We're not sore losers at all, your just terrible winners it seems.
I guess someone has a hard time comprehending what he reads and thinks what he wants to. Yeah the original post clearly states that I'm boasting my ego. It doesn't state an alternate solution to better help the community as whole. If this was a thread about boosting my ego or the corps. It would of said we will redline the Dev's!
I read your posts, all they say is that we don't want Imperfects to do this because we weren't the ones who came up with this idea. We don't want the Imperfects to help the community. We want the Imperfects to just redline the Devs so nothing gets done. We think the Imperfects will have an agenda and that's why they shouldn't talk to the Devs.
You sir are the one trolling, pretty bad at that yourself. You mad bro?
I have a number for a shrink for you if you want. I'm here to help the community.
|
Omnipotens Zitro
Doomheim
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 17:22:00 -
[72] - Quote
EGOMAN VIV wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote: Ohhh nooo's!! There's so much to gain from a beta!! We will solidify our hold on null and FW! Ohhh wait! We are still in CLOSED BETA!!! Also there isn't anything to capture and hold. FACEDESK
Ohhh nooo's!! We are going to make this game infantry only!! That's such an amazing idea to alienate our HAV, Dropship, heavies, logi's, LAV, swarms, grenades and everything else users!!! FACEDESK
Ohhh nooo's!! We are a collective single mind! Nobody has a will and have different varying ideas and solutions for everything! FACEDESK
You see what I'm saying? We have nothing to gain from this. The community as a whole gains from this. This can easily fix a build of fixes.
We have players in every single role in the game who are the best of the best and know what the hell they are talking about it. We have years of experience playing FPS and other games at a high competitive level and at a casual level.
Who would you want to help give feedback? The players who hardly play the game and does not understand the concept of how thing should work? Or the players who have religiously played a certain role, knows all the ins and outs, and understands what is CCP trying to achieve?
Most of Imperfects have been here before the closed beta was even open.
lol U MAD Omni? HTFU dude its only a game :/ Dude I'm LMFAO!!!
I guess someone is butthurt and has to post on a Alt. expected from children.
CCP please clean up the thread please. Thank you! |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1772
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 17:24:00 -
[73] - Quote
How'd you get the number? Ha.
But really, quit this kittening around. Two of the top corps bickering about this is.... Making me wonder if this is Minecraft.
You SI guys have your points, but they're invalid. Not a thing in this thread can go against the simple fact Imperfects won and now have a chance at something. If you want to speak to devs I hear they're on IRC often. Otherwise every post in this thread is now pointless, ********, and slightly mind numbing.
Now grow the kitten up. Thanks again. ^_^ |
EGOMAN VIV
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
20
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 17:31:00 -
[74] - Quote
Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Dude I'm LMFAO!!! I guess someone is butthurt and has to post on a Alt. expected from children. CCP please clean up the thread please. Thank you! You sure do |
Cyn Bruin
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
651
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 17:59:00 -
[75] - Quote
Everyone has the same opportunity to talk to the CCP guys in irc. Set it up and join. Do they listen to us on irc, hell idk. But it is a direct way to talk to them, sometimes they respond, sometimes they dont.
If you post something in the forums that is broken, like the tank (i'm not a tanker) Skytt was talking about or people farming WP off repairs, all that happens is trolls come out and start accusations of cheating (sound familiar). Does it get fixed, sometimes... But there is a whole lot more drama that goes with it than just quietly mentioning it to CCP.
All we wanted to do was give input directly to a large number of devs at the same time. Will it happen, probably not. I doubt they would want to hear what we have to say.
If we thought we would gain an advantage (in a closed beta) as a corporation, would we be sharing what we intended with the community and offering to take community questions to the devs? I think not.
This was just an idea we floated out there among our corporation to try and better help the devs understand the things we see everyday playing the game. I'm sure they know alot of it, but I doubt they sit in their offices playing the game more than we do.
I'm sorry some see this as a way for the Imperfects to "further our galactic domination agenda", this is not the case. We ALL want this game to last a long time and be very successful. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1170
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 18:44:00 -
[76] - Quote
Ty 'SweetCheeks' Borg wrote:Tiel Syysch wrote:Tony Calif wrote:The problem is CCP should see the discussion, not just the final idea. If CCP want to do it then that's cool, Don't take this the wrong way, but I haven't seen a thread about how you get 7000 damage from a HAV. I really havent been checking feedback side of thing much though, so might have missed it. The secret secret side of things isn't right for a beta. The tournament gave people who had found exploits or a broken mechanic, no reason to suggest something was wrong.
I suggest playing a game WITH the Devs. Actually have them play as the assault guys/tanker. Let them Devhack to 5-6mil SP, and skill how you advise. And explain WHY. Treat them as total noobs. Make them better players, with a better understanding of the how & why of FPS. That'd be far better. They do get to see the discussion many times. It's more captured in the why something is a problem and why the proposed solution will fix that problem. Whenever I catch a dev on IRC and bring up an issue with them, it's generally me filling their screen with text explaining everything and not just saying "fix x y and z." I don't post things like that on the forums because I don't want to see them in-game (I haven't built that particular tank and "abused" it myself, by the way, I just know it's possible. I also can't do it even if I wanted to, as it would take a lot more SP than I currently have since I spec'd in other things instead of pushing for that). I send those kinds of amazingly broken things into the devs in private, though. The only other person outside of CCP that I had told the specific build to was Noc, who also can't build that particular fit, but we talk about balance all the time together and run numbers on things to see what kind of lol-worthy things we can theoretically make with the current build. Wait so your saying you knew something was horribly broken but have yet STILL to post on it and make it public?. You do get the idea of beta right?. Your supposed to be showing the community and the devs that something is broken, not hiding it and keeping it to yourself. Sure do that once the game is finished, but if something's broken the world should know about it. Take what happened with the WP farming as an example. Sha and I figured that out and abused the crap out of it for a few days in plain sight, the public saw it complained and we admitted it was broken. We then saw a tonne of people doing it and the devs put a stop to it, (albeit slowly). In your logic we should of just kep doing it and whispered in the devs ear when nobody was about that it was broken. Do you see how wrong that is?, yet we're expected to like the idea of you speaking to the devs about balance and such?. I'm fairly sure I know what your talking about with HAV's as things just didn't add up fighting against your tanks, I'm fairly certain the skills stacking are totally broken and combined with damage mods being broken we end up with around 220% damage or something?. Now I've not tested, run the numbers or proved this, yet you seem to have and haven't posted about it?. We even had a thread discussing it before the match if it's the case and you didn't comment. Redline the devs and form a community council from all CEO's involved at every stage in the tourney imo. I know it's only a request your making, but the posts you've made in this thread prove you can be biased towards your own gains. It also sounds like your already discussing things 1on 1 with the devs anyway in IRC, so why need this?. I'm starting to think this is a troll thread tbh.
I'm not going to post a thread on how to do simple multiplication. You are focusing way to much on a single example result of theory-crafting that we regularly participate in. I know that the average player in our corp has spent more SP in roles that are not "theirs" than the average player has even earned. We constantly, to the point of annoyance, discuss the dynamics of the game while we play - what is wrong, what is missing, what is good, etc. We won the tourney, but would like to cash in our prize in the most beneficial way. That is all this thread is about. |
Tiel Syysch
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
633
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 19:04:00 -
[77] - Quote
Ty 'SweetCheeks' Borg wrote:Wait so your saying you knew something was horribly broken but have yet STILL to post on it and make it public?. You do get the idea of beta right?. Your supposed to be showing the community and the devs that something is broken, not hiding it and keeping it to yourself. Sure do that once the game is finished, but if something's broken the world should know about it. Take what happened with the WP farming as an example. Sha and I figured that out and abused the crap out of it for a few days in plain sight, the public saw it complained and we admitted it was broken. We then saw a tonne of people doing it and the devs put a stop to it, (albeit slowly). In your logic we should of just kep doing it and whispered in the devs ear when nobody was about that it was broken. Do you see how wrong that is?, yet we're expected to like the idea of you speaking to the devs about balance and such?. I'm fairly sure I know what your talking about with HAV's as things just didn't add up fighting against your tanks, I'm fairly certain the skills stacking are totally broken and combined with damage mods being broken we end up with around 220% damage or something?. Now I've not tested, run the numbers or proved this, yet you seem to have and haven't posted about it?. We even had a thread discussing it before the match if it's the case and you didn't comment. Redline the devs and form a community council from all CEO's involved at every stage in the tourney imo. I know it's only a request your making, but the posts you've made in this thread prove you can be biased towards your own gains. It also sounds like your already discussing things 1on 1 with the devs anyway in IRC, so why need this?. I'm starting to think this is a troll thread tbh.
I don't need to make it public. Devs don't want you to openly post exploits (it's even in the forum rules not to do so, by the way). There are things we find that we don't want people to openly use, because it turns into something like the WP farming fiasco, so we send them in privately via email.
So... not sure what you're getting upset about. Mad that you can't abuse it before they're able to fix it? Nobody has used it as far as I know, so you're not missing out on some secret win button that others have had access to.
What thread discussing what before a match are you talking about? I was on IRC and in-game more before the matches than I was checking up on the forums, so yeah I probably missed it. You can't hold me accountable for every single thread on this forum. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 19:09:00 -
[78] - Quote
Best of luck becomming ImperfDevs. |
Necrodermis
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
460
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 19:10:00 -
[79] - Quote
i have an idea. why don't devs read the posts on the forum and send out more feedback emails to everyone instead of listening to one guy.
that way the game won't be ruined because his ideas to make the game better are only influenced by what the one guy likes. |
Super Cargo
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
428
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 19:12:00 -
[80] - Quote
Sir Meode wrote:however taking feedback from one Corperation is not such a good idea.
#1 That's what the forums are for.
#2 Heaven forbid they only take this kind of feedback from some of the most competent players in the game. |
|
Cyn Bruin
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
651
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 19:34:00 -
[81] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:Best of luck becomming ImperfDevs.
Thanks we always appreciate support from SI. |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2046
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 19:53:00 -
[82] - Quote
This thread became something beautiful |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1032
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 19:57:00 -
[83] - Quote
Super Cargo wrote:Sir Meode wrote:however taking feedback from one Corperation is not such a good idea. #1 That's what the forums are for. #2 Heaven forbid they only take this kind of feedback from some of the most competent players in the game.
1) yes the devs scour the forums and report back ideas, issues, bug daily.
2) I'll pass on the compliment and give regnum a cookie. On that I would also mention a good portion of our corp also plays eve and with all honestly, that does help. |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2046
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 19:57:00 -
[84] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:Best of luck becomming ImperfDevs. ImperfDevs doesn't really have a ring to it |
Cyn Bruin
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
651
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 20:02:00 -
[85] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:Tony Calif wrote:Best of luck becomming ImperfDevs. ImperfDevs doesn't really have a ring to it
We could use that as our new corp name when the next build hits. Altho I think we are to be named "Alldin and the Scrubs". It's a good second choice though.
|
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1772
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 20:10:00 -
[86] - Quote
Imperfects should rename themselves Mech Warriors lol |
Necrodermis
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
460
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 20:12:00 -
[87] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:This thread became something beautiful leave it to imperfects to ruin the forums with terrible ideas. you should just stick to blowing your protosuits in matches. |
ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
80
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 20:23:00 -
[88] - Quote
Necrodermis wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:This thread became something beautiful leave it to imperfects to ruin the forums with terrible ideas. you should just stick to blowing your protosuits in matches.
You know us, but we don't know you?
odd how that works |
Necrodermis
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
460
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 20:32:00 -
[89] - Quote
ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI wrote:You know us, but we don't know you? odd how that works popularity Gëá a good thing
shame, you seemed like you were going to say something smart. |
ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
80
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 21:04:00 -
[90] - Quote
Necrodermis wrote:ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI wrote:You know us, but we don't know you? odd how that works popularity Gëá a good thing shame, you seemed like you were going to say something smart.
Who are you again? |
|
Ludwig Van Beatdropin
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
195
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 21:07:00 -
[91] - Quote
Lol keep It up Regnum....I think he Is getting angry. Hahahahaha. |
Super Cargo
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
428
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 21:10:00 -
[92] - Quote
Necrodermis wrote:popularity Gëá a good thing
shame, you seemed like you were going to say something smart.
Scumbag Necrodermis.
Says he thought you were going to say something smart. Didn't actually think you were going to say something smart.
Rude |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1772
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 21:12:00 -
[93] - Quote
Hi, I'm SoTa PoP, I like long walks on the beach, pasta, the color green, anything to do with guitars being awesome. I love love anime, I don't read manga, I don't watch TV, I love to read, work out, socialize. Currently single *wink wink* and currently am very very in debt to several places, some of that debt still from christmas of last effin' year.
I run as a Type-2 heavy, 400k SP away from type-B, proto AR's, and lots of shield mods. As I am in debt and my mic broke I can't speak in game, but beast around anyways, even by myself. Several of my squads have complained, but they enjoy watching me go 25/3. I still work well in squad, I just decide for myself where I'm needed sometimes over keeping my squadies records up.
I hate people who talk too much and enjoy being chilled more then being excited.
Now that you know me, share yourself! Soon we'll be able to trash talk each other all day, and we'll actually know each other! Won't it be grand? |
EnIgMa99
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
219
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 21:37:00 -
[94] - Quote
ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI wrote:Necrodermis wrote:ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI wrote:You know us, but we don't know you? odd how that works popularity Gëá a good thing shame, you seemed like you were going to say something smart. Who are you again?
I loled |
EnIgMa99
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
219
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 21:40:00 -
[95] - Quote
Ty 'SweetCheeks' Borg wrote:Omnipotens Zitro wrote:Oh I'm sorry we don't post things on the forums for everybody to see and abuse. I forget we directly talk to the Dev's in IRC. They already know as we keep the Devs updated on broken stuff. I'm sorry we take a more direct approach in doing things. We like thing done properly. All I'm seeing is SI QQ'ing. Expected from a bunch of sore losers. Tbqh. You say this?, really?. So this thread was just a pathetic attempt to troll everyone about how you won?. Bravo. I expected nothing less tbh. If you really gave a **** and this wasn't just some attempt to boost your ego, you'd of read my post for what it's worth, but you failed to even do that lol. Alldin responded in a correct manner, you responded like a tard. All you read is QQ, but that's why you posted this thread anyway isn't it?. Pathetic tbh. I thought trolling was breaking the rules?, where's Regnum we need him to clarify it seems! We're not sore losers at all, your just terrible winners it seems.
Nah its all casue that tony guy |
Paran Tadec
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
902
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 22:02:00 -
[96] - Quote
ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI wrote:Necrodermis wrote:ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI wrote:You know us, but we don't know you? odd how that works popularity Gëá a good thing shame, you seemed like you were going to say something smart. Who are you again?
True story.
Also, its not about being popular. Infact, we are probably the most hated a$$holes of dust. I think the term most fitting would be "Infamous" or "Notorious" |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1772
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 22:29:00 -
[97] - Quote
Paran Tadec wrote:ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI wrote:Necrodermis wrote:ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI wrote:You know us, but we don't know you? odd how that works popularity Gëá a good thing shame, you seemed like you were going to say something smart. Who are you again? True story. Also, its not about being popular. Infact, we are probably the most hated a$$holes of dust. I think the term most fitting would be "Infamous" or "Notorious" It's from a lack of tact by a few members from Imp that the reputation is that way. |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2046
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 22:53:00 -
[98] - Quote
Necrodermis wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:This thread became something beautiful leave it to imperfects to ruin the forums with terrible ideas. you should just stick to blowing your protosuits in matches. you love to hate us, don't lie
ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI wrote:You know us, but we don't know you? odd how that works |
Paran Tadec
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
902
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 22:58:00 -
[99] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Paran Tadec wrote:ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI wrote:Necrodermis wrote:ReGnUm UNSTOPPABLE DEI wrote:You know us, but we don't know you? odd how that works popularity Gëá a good thing shame, you seemed like you were going to say something smart. Who are you again? True story. Also, its not about being popular. Infact, we are probably the most hated a$$holes of dust. I think the term most fitting would be "Infamous" or "Notorious" It's from a lack of tact by a few members from Imp that the reputation is that way.
known, but at the same time we unknown you know what am sayin? We got a lot to do with what's goin on in Dust, you know what am sayin? But scrublets don't realize it, scrublets in the streets realize, but the evetards and the CPP don't realize it, but it's all good, it is what it is, I ain't gonna talk ya head off, am'a drop these missiles on you, play them reddots...
|
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2046
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 23:00:00 -
[100] - Quote
Paran Tadec wrote:known, but at the same time we unknown you know what am sayin? We got a lot to do with what's goin on in Dust, you know what am sayin? But scrublets don't realize it, scrublets in the streets realize, but the evetards and the CPP don't realize it, but it's all good, it is what it is, I ain't gonna talk ya head off, am'a drop these missiles on you, play them reddots...
I don't even know what your sayin |
|
Paran Tadec
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
902
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 23:11:00 -
[101] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:Paran Tadec wrote:known, but at the same time we unknown you know what am sayin? We got a lot to do with what's goin on in Dust, you know what am sayin? But scrublets don't realize it, scrublets in the streets realize, but the evetards and the CPP don't realize it, but it's all good, it is what it is, I ain't gonna talk ya head off, am'a drop these missiles on you, play them reddots...
I don't even know what your sayin
cause u isnt recognizing. |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1772
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 23:22:00 -
[102] - Quote
Paran Tadec wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:Paran Tadec wrote:known, but at the same time we unknown you know what am sayin? We got a lot to do with what's goin on in Dust, you know what am sayin? But scrublets don't realize it, scrublets in the streets realize, but the evetards and the CPP don't realize it, but it's all good, it is what it is, I ain't gonna talk ya head off, am'a drop these missiles on you, play them reddots...
I don't even know what your sayin cause u isnt recognizing. I don't think anyone can recognize your horrible english lol |
Chao Wolf
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
209
|
Posted - 2012.11.15 04:08:00 -
[103] - Quote
Paran Tadec wrote:
known, the same time we unknown you know what am sayin? We got a lot to do with what's goin on in Dust, you know what am sayin? But scrublets don't realize it, scrublets in the streets realize, but the evetards and the CPP don't realize it, but it's all good, it is what it is, I ain't gonna talk ya head off, am'a drop these missiles on you, play them reddots...
Paran don't give up your day job. |
charlesnette dalari
Creative Killers
159
|
Posted - 2012.11.15 04:09:00 -
[104] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Paran Tadec wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:Paran Tadec wrote:known, but at the same time we unknown you know what am sayin? We got a lot to do with what's goin on in Dust, you know what am sayin? But scrublets don't realize it, scrublets in the streets realize, but the evetards and the CPP don't realize it, but it's all good, it is what it is, I ain't gonna talk ya head off, am'a drop these missiles on you, play them reddots...
I don't even know what your sayin cause u isnt recognizing. I don't think anyone can recognize your horrible english lol
Fo shizzle my nizzle
|
Omnipotens Zitro
Doomheim
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 04:30:00 -
[105] - Quote
I would love if a Dev or GM can post to verify that you guys read this and/or discuss about this among yourselfs. Thank you! |
Corvus Ravensong
Skyel Industries Subspace Exploration Agency
179
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 04:53:00 -
[106] - Quote
Not a fan of your corp or it's members for the most part, but even I won't argue that some in game testing time with the dev's and the winners of the tourney would serve ALL of us better than just some "We pwned the devs!!" e-peen extension.
I know for a fact that the imperfects know about all the current exploits, and all the current imbalance issues - I see them using them day in and day out.
For them to be in voice chat while they show the devs these issues 1st hand would be one hell of a step toward helping the devs decide how best to pioritize upcoming fixes.
Besides, nothing says the dev's have to take their advice on what needs done to fix these things.
TL/DR: much as I dislike them, Omnipotens & corp have a valid point, and have made a valid offer. |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2046
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 05:02:00 -
[107] - Quote
Corvus Ravensong wrote:Not a fan of your corp or it's members for the most part, but even I won't argue that some in game testing time with the dev's and the winners of the tourney would serve ALL of us better than just some "We pwned the devs!!" e-peen extension.
I know for a fact that the imperfects know about all the current exploits, and all the current imbalance issues - I see them using them day in and day out.
For them to be in voice chat while they show the devs these issues 1st hand would be one hell of a step toward helping the devs decide how best to pioritize upcoming fixes.
Besides, nothing says the dev's have to take their advice on what needs done to fix these things.
TL/DR: much as I dislike them, Omnipotens & corp have a valid point, and have made a valid offer. I like the post except for that part, pwning the devs isn't an e-peen extension its a given |
Swufy
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
70
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 08:59:00 -
[108] - Quote
As a dedicated sniper, I agree with OP. I would rather have an in-depth conversation with a group of CCP then play a match with them. Not because of who would win or not, but because our time and there's is better spent that way. I think it should be questions both ways. With as many players and specialists as we have, CCP can ask us about tanks, dropships, different loadouts, etc. and why. Ask the people who have the mechanics of this build mastered whether they are working or not and why. Interview us, or even ask us to demonstrate some of the things we do. Us testers are here for you in this beta, so use us as a tool to help more people enjoy it like we do. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |