DUST Search - gg ccp

All Channels

General Discussions

gg ccp

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
jade gamester Vengeance Unbound RUST415 249	Posted - 2015.04.13 07:43:00 - [1] - Quote Since the event started iv only been able to get into 11 gfw what a waste of fw boosters, never again. Will the real vu please stand up o7
Arkena Wyrnspire Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 23184	Posted - 2015.04.13 08:24:00 - [2] - Quote Blame the Caldari. Gallente Guide one day i may leave the basement but that day is not today
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 5789	Posted - 2015.04.13 08:27:00 - [3] - Quote Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. "That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032 Dust514 // Podcast & Blog www.biomassed.net
The Lion ElJonson 1st Legion The Dark Angels 94	Posted - 2015.04.13 08:37:00 - [4] - Quote blame the Gallete, if they weren't packing and jamming the FW with 3 squads of cannon fodder and filling teams with expensive tangos then the odd disorganised merc might get a chance to die continuously at the hands of the Caldari state. Personally im glad i stuck my x3 30 day boosters with a faction thats actually effective "Oh you brought Tanks?" "ATTACH BAYONETES BOYS!"
Arkena Wyrnspire Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 23185	Posted - 2015.04.13 08:40:00 - [5] - Quote The Lion ElJonson wrote: blame the Gallete, if they weren't packing and jamming the FW with 3 squads of cannon fodder and filling teams with expensive tangos then the odd disorganised merc might get a chance to die continuously at the hands of the Caldari state. Personally im glad i stuck my x3 30 day boosters with a faction thats actually effective Ahahahahahahahahaaaaa This is forum gold right here. Caldari idiocy at its finest. Do tell me when your cunning plan to not field anything outside your red line gets you more districts than CCP safeguards for you. Gallente Guide one day i may leave the basement but that day is not today
The Lion ElJonson 1st Legion The Dark Angels 94	Posted - 2015.04.13 08:44:00 - [6] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: The Lion ElJonson wrote: blame the Gallete, if they weren't packing and jamming the FW with 3 squads of cannon fodder and filling teams with expensive tangos then the odd disorganised merc might get a chance to die continuously at the hands of the Caldari state. Personally im glad i stuck my x3 30 day boosters with a faction thats actually effective Ahahahahahahahahaaaaa This is forum gold right here. Caldari idiocy at its finest. Do tell me when your cunning plan to not field anything outside your red line gets you more districts than CCP safeguards for you. not seen a red line for a while just red mist through the scope, hows black reach? "Oh you brought Tanks?" "ATTACH BAYONETES BOYS!"
Arkena Wyrnspire Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 23185	Posted - 2015.04.13 08:49:00 - [7] - Quote You realise you only get noticeable red mist on your screen when you die, right? Perhaps I should applaud you for coming out of the red line, even if you are getting instantly mowed down. Btw, do you honestly believe that not being able to field many teams is a good thing? I'd hoped the Caldari were progressing past that attitude, but it seems some of you are still in the dark ages. I pity Middas if you're the type he has to try and herd. Gallente Guide one day i may leave the basement but that day is not today
The Lion ElJonson 1st Legion The Dark Angels 94	Posted - 2015.04.13 08:58:00 - [8] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: You realise you only get noticeable red mist on your screen when you die, right? Perhaps I should applaud you for coming out of the red line, even if you are getting instantly mowed down. Btw, do you honestly believe that not being able to field many teams is a good thing? I'd hoped the Caldari were progressing past that attitude, but it seems some of you are still in the dark ages. I pity Middas if you're the type he has to try and herd. who? no i was teaming with one of yours, skeletor something or other, good effective player. "Oh you brought Tanks?" "ATTACH BAYONETES BOYS!"
Mejt0 Dead Man's Game RUST415 1249	Posted - 2015.04.13 09:29:00 - [9] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: The Lion ElJonson wrote: blame the Gallete, if they weren't packing and jamming the FW with 3 squads of cannon fodder and filling teams with expensive tangos then the odd disorganised merc might get a chance to die continuously at the hands of the Caldari state. Personally im glad i stuck my x3 30 day boosters with a faction thats actually effective Ahahahahahahahahaaaaa This is forum gold right here. Caldari idiocy at its finest. Do tell me when your cunning plan to not field anything outside your red line gets you more districts than CCP safeguards for you. Last time [before event] when i've played Cal fw, gallente q sync squads were beaten to the ground every time. They were collecting cans deep inside their redline. That being said. When gal q sync, they're just scrubs. When Cal q sync, they play like in PC. Caldari Loyalist thecreaturehub fan Mejt0 Sale List
Hawkings Greenback Dead Man's Game RUST415 326	Posted - 2015.04.13 09:37:00 - [10] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. That seems like a far to sensible a thing to do and I would be more inclined to use boosters if it was the case. Not everyone can spend 10 hours plus a day on Dust every day. Good idea that. But every night I burn. Screaming the animal scream. Every night I burn. Dreaming the crow-black dream.


CCP Rattati C C P C C P Alliance 20536	Posted - 2015.04.13 09:41:00 - [11] - Quote Hawkings Greenback wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. That seems like a far to sensible a thing to do and I would be more inclined to use boosters if it was the case. Not everyone can spend 10 hours plus a day on Dust every day. Good idea that. What about number of Battles? "As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"

The Eristic Dust 90210 865	Posted - 2015.04.13 09:48:00 - [12] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. Absolutely. I almost never pop my actives (and hence, don't need to acquire more - they've really only been used for MCCs) due to how time-inefficient they are, with enormous blocks of boosted time thrown away due to things like, you know, sleeping and working, followed by the pressure to grind WP as hard as possible to maximize their output in the time remaining, instead of just having fun and reaping the rewards organically. Reality is the original Rorschach. Verily! So much for all that.
Bjorn Retribution Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire 4	Posted - 2015.04.13 09:50:00 - [13] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Hawkings Greenback wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. That seems like a far to sensible a thing to do and I would be more inclined to use boosters if it was the case. Not everyone can spend 10 hours plus a day on Dust every day. Good idea that. What about number of Battles? Call them Battle Boosters, or Participation Boosters? and sell them in packs of 10 battles, 50 battles, 100 battles or something along those lines. No need to change active or passive as those can cater for those players who can spend how ever many hours a day logged in.
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 5796	Posted - 2015.04.13 09:50:00 - [14] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Hawkings Greenback wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. That seems like a far to sensible a thing to do and I would be more inclined to use boosters if it was the case. Not everyone can spend 10 hours plus a day on Dust every day. Good idea that. What about number of Battles? Hmmmmmmm not as ideal but if its easier to implement, I certainly would not complain. "That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032 Dust514 // Podcast & Blog www.biomassed.net
Cat Merc Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback 15905	Posted - 2015.04.13 09:52:00 - [15] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Hawkings Greenback wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. That seems like a far to sensible a thing to do and I would be more inclined to use boosters if it was the case. Not everyone can spend 10 hours plus a day on Dust every day. Good idea that. What about number of Battles? That would mean that the players who do play a lot of matches get shafted. I say make the timer active whenever you are in match. Cat Merc for C¦¦P¦¦M¦¦9¦¦ CPM Nyan! *Vote 'Keshava' for the new Gallente vehicle name!*
Bjorn Retribution Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire 4	Posted - 2015.04.13 10:05:00 - [16] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Hawkings Greenback wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. That seems like a far to sensible a thing to do and I would be more inclined to use boosters if it was the case. Not everyone can spend 10 hours plus a day on Dust every day. Good idea that. What about number of Battles? That would mean that the players who do play a lot of matches get shafted. I say make the timer active whenever you are in match. Not if you keep active boosters and make it more worthwhile to stick with active if you can put the hours in For example. A 7 day booster cost 5,000 AUR In those 7 days you could play 50 matches if you have the time. The theoretical new boosters could be 10,000 AUR for a pack of 50 Battles. Active giving a saving advantage to those who can put the hours in. So people who currently use active will continue to use active. Whereas the new pack of 50 battles caters to those who can only play a few matches a night and may never even buy boosters whatsoever as they cant put the time in.
Sequal's Back Dead Man's Game RUST415 518	Posted - 2015.04.13 10:05:00 - [17] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Hawkings Greenback wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. That seems like a far to sensible a thing to do and I would be more inclined to use boosters if it was the case. Not everyone can spend 10 hours plus a day on Dust every day. Good idea that. What about number of Battles? That would mean that the players who do play a lot of matches get shafted. I say make the timer active whenever you are in match. In this case the active boosters will have to be reduced a lot ^^ I really like the idea of booster per battle, I was about to propose it when I saw Rattati's message^^ Fix the game before trying to add anything else. (Hint: hit detection, lags, glitches,.. you've got some work :) )
Hawkings Greenback Dead Man's Game RUST415 327	Posted - 2015.04.13 10:06:00 - [18] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Hawkings Greenback wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. That seems like a far to sensible a thing to do and I would be more inclined to use boosters if it was the case. Not everyone can spend 10 hours plus a day on Dust every day. Good idea that. What about number of Battles? Yes please But every night I burn. Screaming the animal scream. Every night I burn. Dreaming the crow-black dream.
Sole Fenychs Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 678	Posted - 2015.04.13 10:13:00 - [19] - Quote Bjorn Retribution wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Hawkings Greenback wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. That seems like a far to sensible a thing to do and I would be more inclined to use boosters if it was the case. Not everyone can spend 10 hours plus a day on Dust every day. Good idea that. What about number of Battles? Call them Battle Boosters, or Participation Boosters? and sell them in packs of 10 battles, 50 battles, 100 battles or something along those lines. No need to change active or passive as those can cater for those players who can spend how ever many hours a day logged in. Personally, I'd only ever use passives, (in fact, they are the only ones that I ever used, outside of my two alts who gained free actives) because I'm tired of protostomps/extremely variable battle quality and can't plan my time for the game. But battle boosters would appeal to me much more than current active boosters.
Joseph Ridgeson WarRavens 3757	Posted - 2015.04.13 10:13:00 - [20] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Hawkings Greenback wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. That seems like a far to sensible a thing to do and I would be more inclined to use boosters if it was the case. Not everyone can spend 10 hours plus a day on Dust every day. Good idea that. What about number of Battles? Good: "Damn, I am moving/have to work/PS3 caught fire. No worries; my Booster is 30 games so it isn't going to rot!" Bad: "Well, it is the weekend. I bought a booster for X Aurum and despite being able to play 60 games, I only got rewarded for 30 games. If it was a 3 day booster, I would have gotten my money worth!" Bad: "I played poorly that match or got in late. I only got 6,000 SP when I normally pull 12,000+ so I missed out on 6,000 SP. If it wasn't based on a number of wins, it wouldn't affect me at all." I know I would be angry if I joined a match that had 20 seconds left and it used my booster because I couldn't leave in time. "This is B.S! This is B.S! I paid money! Cash money, dollars money, cash money!"

Breakin Stuff Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group 8036	Posted - 2015.04.13 10:16:00 - [21] - Quote Time based boosters have the disadvantage of being utterly wasted if real life hits you. That can be anywhere up to 75 bucks a month if you triple stack everything. And the problem with number of battles is... You have a bad ambush and get skullstomped. Youearn a kill and an assist. At EoM you get no SP. one battle wasted. You lose a facwar. Instead of a potential 1000 LP You start with 300. One battle wasted. You spawn in to a match with the MCC at half armor. At most you're going to pull a base of 2k SP. God forbid you spawn in just before it pops. Battle wasted. Realistically setting boosters for earned SP/LP rather than time or battle number is the best way for players to feel that they are getting their money's worth overall. Because if you're expending uses on bad matches ( there's too many reasons this can be out of your control) then it's going to leave a sour taste in people's mouths. AV
xp3ll3d dust The Southern Legion 213	Posted - 2015.04.13 10:16:00 - [22] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. I've felt like this for a long time. Even LoL has match based boosters. I use those as my time is very low these days. I held off from suggesting it, as I thought I'd get flamed with "well you already have that, just use the instant boost at the end of a match". yeah true... but it doesn't feel the same. CPM1 Candidate > A richer Dust app ecosystem means more player engagement!
Bjorn Retribution Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire 5	Posted - 2015.04.13 10:17:00 - [23] - Quote Joseph Ridgeson wrote: Bad: "I played poorly that match or got in late. I only got 6,000 SP when I normally pull 12,000+ so I missed out on 6,000 SP. If it wasn't based on a number of wins, it wouldn't affect me at all." I know I would be angry if I joined a match that had 20 seconds left and it used my booster because I couldn't leave in time. Could just make it so the booster only counts when in a match from start to finish perhaps ?
Litany 0f Fury Revolution of Evil Henchmen 24	Posted - 2015.04.13 10:32:00 - [24] - Quote Why not have both? time based and battle count based that way we can make are own minds up. you can always review later to see if you want to get rid of one or not. its all aurum sales at the end of the day. Also if you are going to go down the route of battle count based then I'd recommend putting limits in similar to the number of WP/SP payout you have on pub matches. ¬ ¬ \ n+Ç ´\ `--¬___ )~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \ / " '''/
Bright Steel Horizons' Edge 1182	Posted - 2015.04.13 10:43:00 - [25] - Quote Breakin Stuff wrote: Time based boosters have the disadvantage of being utterly wasted if real life hits you. That can be anywhere up to 75 bucks a month if you triple stack everything. And the problem with number of battles is... You have a bad ambush and get skullstomped. Youearn a kill and an assist. At EoM you get no SP. one battle wasted. You lose a facwar. Instead of a potential 1000 LP You start with 300. One battle wasted. You spawn in to a match with the MCC at half armor. At most you're going to pull a base of 2k SP. God forbid you spawn in just before it pops. Battle wasted. Realistically setting boosters for earned SP/LP rather than time or battle number is the best way for players to feel that they are getting their money's worth overall. Because if you're expending uses on bad matches ( there's too many reasons this can be out of your control) then it's going to leave a sour taste in people's mouths. Logic wins again Dust 514, the BEST WORST game you can't stop playing.
Flint Beastgood III GunFall Mobilization 1594	Posted - 2015.04.13 11:03:00 - [26] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. I had this exact thought just the other day. Active boosters are not passive boosters so why should they run out passively (when not playing)? It would be better if they only ran down whilst you are logged in. Rare Item Trades
Nestil Nos Nothi 214	Posted - 2015.04.13 11:04:00 - [27] - Quote Then how about Boosters with x amount of charges?! So you can use them after a good match and you would be able to decide to use it only if the match was worth using it... Just my idea.... Like 1 booster with 30 charges...and you could use one charge per match of your choice, which would result that you could use it on matches were you performed well (and not got stomped to the ground)...
Flint Beastgood III GunFall Mobilization 1594	Posted - 2015.04.13 11:06:00 - [28] - Quote Nestil wrote: Then how about Boosters with x amount of charges?! So you can use them after a good match and you would be able to decide to use it only if the match was worth using it... Just my idea.... Sounds like the rip off that is instant boosters. Rare Item Trades
Hawkings Greenback Dead Man's Game RUST415 327	Posted - 2015.04.13 11:13:00 - [29] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Hawkings Greenback wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Boosters in general should move away from being time based and more on straight instead to earnable LP/SP. No time limit, earn it at your leisure. I would be SO more inclined to buy active boosters. That seems like a far to sensible a thing to do and I would be more inclined to use boosters if it was the case. Not everyone can spend 10 hours plus a day on Dust every day. Good idea that. What about number of Battles? That would mean that the players who do play a lot of matches get shafted. I say make the timer active whenever you are in match. Can't we have both types still ? That way those who have time can utilise the per day booster and those who have limited time can use the per battle type. But every night I burn. Screaming the animal scream. Every night I burn. Dreaming the crow-black dream.
Nestil Nos Nothi 214	Posted - 2015.04.13 11:13:00 - [30] - Quote Flint Beastgood III wrote: Nestil wrote: Then how about Boosters with x amount of charges?! So you can use them after a good match and you would be able to decide to use it only if the match was worth using it... Just my idea.... Sounds like the rip off that is instant boosters. Well then we wouldn't need instant Boosters anymore and CCP could remove the ****** missions which requires to use them in the same move. So this would be a win for everybody :3



Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.