DUST Search - JLAVs have got to be removed.

All Channels

General Discussions

JLAVs have got to be removed.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Rowdy Railgunner Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention 514	Posted - 2015.04.01 03:24:00 - [61] - Quote Mary Sedillo wrote: With the introduction of tiers of tanks of ever increasing price, WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMY!!!! JLAVs are here to stay and if you try to nerf me, know this, I will put a jihad on you. Long live the remote. Universal in it's prowess and feared by all the K/D whoring poop-tankers.
CHET CHEWS Titans of Phoenix 62	Posted - 2015.04.01 03:27:00 - [62] - Quote Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: With the introduction of tiers of tanks of ever increasing price, WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMY!!!! JLAVs are here to stay and if you try to nerf me, know this, I will put a jihad on you. Long live the remote. Universal in it's prowess and feared by all the K/D whoring poop-tankers. All Hail JLAV-¦S!!! "FU CHET CHEWS"- Sumar load 2014-2015
Mary Sedillo Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 409	Posted - 2015.04.01 03:37:00 - [63] - Quote CHET CHEWS wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: CHET CHEWS wrote: You know whats cheap?? Staying inthe redline with a railgun tank and b*tching about jlav-¦s when its the only thing you can do to kill people like you sooooo yea DEAL WITH IT Want to know when I take cover in the back? Read higher up in this post. Mostly it is ONLY when there is overwhelming AV or tanks on the field and I must be strategic. Really one mother fudging av guy in a militia suit to much for your proto tank? Awwwwwwww i feel bad 4 u I laugh at one militia av. But when there are 4 or more? Then I take cover and pick them off. Tactics. I don't mind RE's being used thrown on a tank that isn't paying attention. Its the 12+ RE's on an LAV all bursting at once, often out of nowhere. Its broken and OP.
CHET CHEWS Titans of Phoenix 64	Posted - 2015.04.01 03:38:00 - [64] - Quote Mary Sedillo wrote: CHET CHEWS wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: CHET CHEWS wrote: You know whats cheap?? Staying inthe redline with a railgun tank and b*tching about jlav-¦s when its the only thing you can do to kill people like you sooooo yea DEAL WITH IT Want to know when I take cover in the back? Read higher up in this post. Mostly it is ONLY when there is overwhelming AV or tanks on the field and I must be strategic. Really one mother fudging av guy in a militia suit to much for your proto tank? Awwwwwwww i feel bad 4 u I laugh at one militia av. But when there are 4 or more? Then I take cover and pick them off. Tactics. I don't mind RE's being used thrown on a tank that isn't paying attention. Its the 12+ RE's on an LAV all bursting at once, often out of nowhere. Its broken and OP. Sure bro whatever helps you sleep at night "FU CHET CHEWS"- Sumar load 2014-2015
Mary Sedillo Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 411	Posted - 2015.04.01 03:43:00 - [65] - Quote CHET CHEWS wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: CHET CHEWS wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: CHET CHEWS wrote: You know whats cheap?? Staying inthe redline with a railgun tank and b*tching about jlav-¦s when its the only thing you can do to kill people like you sooooo yea DEAL WITH IT Want to know when I take cover in the back? Read higher up in this post. Mostly it is ONLY when there is overwhelming AV or tanks on the field and I must be strategic. Really one mother fudging av guy in a militia suit to much for your proto tank? Awwwwwwww i feel bad 4 u I laugh at one militia av. But when there are 4 or more? Then I take cover and pick them off. Tactics. I don't mind RE's being used thrown on a tank that isn't paying attention. Its the 12+ RE's on an LAV all bursting at once, often out of nowhere. Its broken and OP. Sure bro whatever helps you sleep at night Bring a militia av next time you see me, by yourself, and see how well that goes. ;)
Rowdy Railgunner Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention 515	Posted - 2015.04.01 03:50:00 - [66] - Quote Mary Sedillo wrote: I don't mind RE's being used thrown on a tank that isn't paying attention. Its the 12+ RE's on an LAV all bursting at once, often out of nowhere. Its broken and OP. First off. It isn't out of "nowhere". We drive up to you from far away and you have plenty of time to pick us off as we approach. Second, it is only 7 REs, not 12. Third, infantry shooting us as we drive around kills us just as fast as a tank shooting us, and they see us lot's more than you realize. Finally, if you get blown up by jihad, you deserve it. There are many tankers that I have tried and tried and tried to kill jihadi-style. They popped me everytime. They are good tankers though, so you might just not be in their league.
Mary Sedillo Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 429	Posted - 2015.04.01 04:06:00 - [67] - Quote Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: I don't mind RE's being used thrown on a tank that isn't paying attention. Its the 12+ RE's on an LAV all bursting at once, often out of nowhere. Its broken and OP. First off. It isn't out of "nowhere". We drive up to you from far away and you have plenty of time to pick us off as we approach. Second, it is only 7 REs, not 12. Third, infantry shooting us as we drive around kills us just as fast as a tank shooting us, and they see us lot's more than you realize. Finally, if you get blown up by jihad, you deserve it. There are many tankers that I have tried and tried and tried to kill jihadi-style. They popped me everytime. They are good tankers though, so you might just not be in their league. Nah, I pop every other tank out there. I've popped LAVs too. Its the ISK nature of it. I have to be lucky every time versus the LAV. He only needs to get lucky once. I am not saying I cannot kill them. I do. Its their cost and effectiveness when they get to you which is out of this world.
Mary Sedillo Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 429	Posted - 2015.04.01 04:07:00 - [68] - Quote Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: I don't mind RE's being used thrown on a tank that isn't paying attention. Its the 12+ RE's on an LAV all bursting at once, often out of nowhere. Its broken and OP. First off. It isn't out of "nowhere". We drive up to you from far away and you have plenty of time to pick us off as we approach. Second, it is only 7 REs, not 12. Third, infantry shooting us as we drive around kills us just as fast as a tank shooting us, and they see us lot's more than you realize. Finally, if you get blown up by jihad, you deserve it. There are many tankers that I have tried and tried and tried to kill jihadi-style. They popped me everytime. They are good tankers though, so you might just not be in their league. If you aren't getting 12+ on an LAV, you aren't doing it right.
Juno Tristan Obscure Reference 494	Posted - 2015.04.01 04:08:00 - [69] - Quote Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: I don't mind RE's being used thrown on a tank that isn't paying attention. Its the 12+ RE's on an LAV all bursting at once, often out of nowhere. Its broken and OP. First off. It isn't out of "nowhere". We drive up to you from far away and you have plenty of time to pick us off as we approach. Second, it is only 7 REs, not 12. Third, infantry shooting us as we drive around kills us just as fast as a tank shooting us, and they see us lot's more than you realize. Finally, if you get blown up by jihad, you deserve it. There are many tankers that I have tried and tried and tried to kill jihadi-style. They popped me everytime. They are good tankers though, so you might just not be in their league. Sounds like you're not a very good jihadist ADS Ramming Revenge! Plasma Cannon Rampage
Rowdy Railgunner Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention 515	Posted - 2015.04.01 04:17:00 - [70] - Quote Juno Tristan wrote: Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: I don't mind RE's being used thrown on a tank that isn't paying attention. Its the 12+ RE's on an LAV all bursting at once, often out of nowhere. Its broken and OP. First off. It isn't out of "nowhere". We drive up to you from far away and you have plenty of time to pick us off as we approach. Second, it is only 7 REs, not 12. Third, infantry shooting us as we drive around kills us just as fast as a tank shooting us, and they see us lot's more than you realize. Finally, if you get blown up by jihad, you deserve it. There are many tankers that I have tried and tried and tried to kill jihadi-style. They popped me everytime. They are good tankers though, so you might just not be in their league. Sounds like you're not a very good jihadist You say that now, but know this, I make it rain tears in my JLAV.

Mary Sedillo Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 429	Posted - 2015.04.01 07:10:00 - [71] - Quote Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Juno Tristan wrote: Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: I don't mind RE's being used thrown on a tank that isn't paying attention. Its the 12+ RE's on an LAV all bursting at once, often out of nowhere. Its broken and OP. First off. It isn't out of "nowhere". We drive up to you from far away and you have plenty of time to pick us off as we approach. Second, it is only 7 REs, not 12. Third, infantry shooting us as we drive around kills us just as fast as a tank shooting us, and they see us lot's more than you realize. Finally, if you get blown up by jihad, you deserve it. There are many tankers that I have tried and tried and tried to kill jihadi-style. They popped me everytime. They are good tankers though, so you might just not be in their league. Sounds like you're not a very good jihadist You say that now, but know this, I make it rain tears in my JLAV. Its no skill. You can fail a **** ton ALL match, and still not break the bank. That is the problem with. It isn't the fact that you get me. I don't want to be invincible. But I detest OHKOs on High-End vehicles. Used to be forge guns could OHKO drop ships back in the day. They fixed that.
Alena Ventrallis Ahrendee Inc. Negative-Feedback 2906	Posted - 2015.04.01 07:11:00 - [72] - Quote Honestly, with the new changes to LAVs, jihads are quite easy to defeat. You might try getting a gunner, they make short work of almost all LAVs. Therefore, never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.
Mary Sedillo Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 430	Posted - 2015.04.01 07:30:00 - [73] - Quote Alena Ventrallis wrote: Honestly, with the new changes to LAVs, jihads are quite easy to defeat. You might try getting a gunner, they make short work of almost all LAVs. But that squishiness is the double-edged blade of the jeep. It used to be that the older LAVs would BOUNCE off of you if they didn't hit you hard enough, but with the paper thin tank of the current LAVs, they nearly ALWAYS explode on light contact. Its ridiculous. I use gunners all the time. We pop many, But most JLAVers will continue throughout a match, ruining an ability for a tank to be able to push normally at extremely cheap cost.
KalOfTheRathi Nec Tributis 1459	Posted - 2015.04.01 07:37:00 - [74] - Quote Mary Sedillo wrote: With the introduction of tiers of tanks of ever increasing price, the JLAV is still too effective for the price. One person in a cheap lav loaded to the gills with remotes. Think about that. OHKO. This severely hurts vehicle operators who have invested millions of SP and ISK. Push on the point? Going good. AV is hurting you as par the course, then BOOM JLAV hits and you are done. How should it do that? Why is that right? It isn't. CCP needs to make it where friendly vehicles cannot have friendly REs on them. Problem fixed. Good to see you posting on this Mary. Although, I seriously doubt it will matter. Balanced game play has never been something Dust was noted for, much less aspires to. Dust forums are swamped with QQ infantry that want nothing more than to OHK anyone that isn't them. Much less vehicles. In fact, I would bet they think they should be able to drive their JLAV into dropships as well. On the payback can be fun front, I rammed two LAVs today. One parked and one on the move. They all died, including their pathetic little remote explosives. My favorite tank is a Lightning. Just sayin.
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 1204	Posted - 2015.04.01 08:14:00 - [75] - Quote One Eyed King wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: Cost of Dropsuits and Tanks are quite different. NO dropsuit costs 1.4 million ISK. That is around 6-7 games worth of isk! So the cheapest tanks cost 1.4 million? If not, I suggest you run a cheaper tank. It seems we are again at a point where only tanks can counter other tanks, and I can't say I am going to care much about the efficacy of JJs until AV can do something other than take out LAVs and DS. So you're telling us your Militia swarm with only 1 skill level researched doesn't do any damage anymore? GASP?! Andthat you have to train up your skills to Proto do deal damage against a Proto tank? DOUBLE GASP! What is this world coming to, where Investment into weapons is needed to counter Investment into weapons! TRIPLE GASP! sigh You could just say "I don't try" in large bold caps above your head kiddo. It only takes about a week to max out a Swarm or Forge gun, plus about another to get around halfway into a decent suit to complement said gun. If tanks were really the problem you claimed, then you would have gotten those skills. Sitting around with Militia AV and exclaiming it doesn't kill the tanks is just pitiful man. I can forge them down relatively well with my Militia setups, or heard them out of an area with my Militia Swarms. If you have problems with the improved variants, where I often end up nearly killing my targets... then YOU have got some practicing to do. http://youtu.be/dtXupQg77SU Dust to Dust Remember the dream you had before the day you were born.
Lorhak Gannarsein Nos Nothi 4512	Posted - 2015.04.01 08:54:00 - [76] - Quote Haven't been killed by a JLAV for months (admittedly I've not played these last two weeks, been grinding creds in Elite Dangerous) but even so; in a few games I've had to deal with multiple JLAVs (one match had three different JLAVers at different times, as well as a forge gunner and a tank; it was a fun match) and never has it been a problem. If you're having issues it means your priorities are wrong. AV is usually first target, of course, but should I see a LAV, I will move heaven and earth to make it dead. And it dies. If you're using a blaster, well, it takes like ten shots to kill one, and even fewer if you happen to hit the bombs. Maybe your squad should start paying attention to JLAVs with you, and give you a hand when it's necessary? I mean, it seems reasonable that if you've got four guys trying to take you out that one of your mates steps in to help you out? My 'like' button is broken!! The forums removed my ability to appreciate my fellow man.
Yeeeuuuupppp 986	Posted - 2015.04.01 10:39:00 - [77] - Quote Mary Sedillo wrote: Yeeeuuuupppp wrote: Pay attention. Viable tactic. Working as intended. Allah Akbar Definitely not a valid tactic on the ISK ratio of your vehicles cost + suit vs tank and crew. I pay plenty of attention. Its how I faceroll most other tankers. But, do you play in a squad that will call out the jihad? Do you use a scanner and see the fuckton of remotes moving towards you? They made people have to get creative with jihad jeeps since the bandwidth change. This may be a tad bias but something has to kill those invincible madrugars, no? *Sheeba Sheeba* PSN: GMANCASH "I played Dust so long i grew a f--king afro"
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. 4436	Posted - 2015.04.01 10:49:00 - [78] - Quote Won't happen A 10k ISK JLAV destroying a 1.2mil HAV with 40mil SP put into it is completely fair but if that 1.2mil HAV destroys infantry with 2 gunners then it is OP and must be nerfed. AV cry about 1 player to 1 player but if i need a second player to consistantly watch the map for a JLAV then that is 2 players and again breaks the ratio that AV consistantly preaches. JLAV takes no skill, SP or ISK to do it and the rewards are great but scrubs be scrubs. CCP Rattati - "One giant vehicle nerf with more power to AV", you have got to be kidding...''
Luther Mandrix WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL 464	Posted - 2015.04.01 11:03:00 - [79] - Quote Mary Sedillo wrote: With the introduction of tiers of tanks of ever increasing price, the JLAV is still too effective for the price. One person in a cheap lav loaded to the gills with remotes. Think about that. OHKO. This severely hurts vehicle operators who have invested millions of SP and ISK. Push on the point? Going good. AV is hurting you as par the course, then BOOM JLAV hits and you are done. How should it do that? Why is that right? It isn't. CCP needs to make it where friendly vehicles cannot have friendly REs on them. Problem fixed. LAV go boom ,had half its hp removed and has Res that you as a tanker can detonate.And your teams small arms fire can detonate the Res .I don't see a problem.
Luther Mandrix WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL 464	Posted - 2015.04.01 11:04:00 - [80] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Won't happen A 10k ISK JLAV destroying a 1.2mil HAV with 40mil SP put into it is completely fair but if that 1.2mil HAV destroys infantry with 2 gunners then it is OP and must be nerfed. AV cry about 1 player to 1 player but if i need a second player to consistantly watch the map for a JLAV then that is 2 players and again breaks the ratio that AV consistantly preaches. JLAV takes no skill, SP or ISK to do it and the rewards are great but scrubs be scrubs. So Remotes are a problem in the game don't let the scout community hear that.

Yeeeuuuupppp 986	Posted - 2015.04.01 11:15:00 - [81] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Won't happen A 10k ISK JLAV destroying a 1.2mil HAV with 40mil SP put into it is completely fair but if that 1.2mil HAV destroys infantry with 2 gunners then it is OP and must be nerfed. AV cry about 1 player to 1 player but if i need a second player to consistantly watch the map for a JLAV then that is 2 players and again breaks the ratio that AV consistantly preaches. JLAV takes no skill, SP or ISK to do it and the rewards are great but scrubs be scrubs. If they didn't want jlav to be a tactic they wouldn't have made remotes stick. Valid tactic. Working as intended. Rip tankers wallets *Sheeba Sheeba* PSN: GMANCASH "I played Dust so long i grew a f--king afro"
dust 514 shadow Eternal Beings 6	Posted - 2015.04.01 11:28:00 - [82] - Quote Mary Sedillo wrote: Problem is, they can lose around 15 LAVs before it even approaches the cost of my tank. Its not a 'bad' thing. Its a OHKO on a 1.4 million tank with over 40 million sp into it. It is solid v. tanks and infantry. This OHKO option should be fixed, or lower costs across the board on tanks. Then use cheaper tanks and shoot the lavs before they hit you. I am assuming you can use a rail gun and you have to have some lvl of awareness when tanking so.......
Juno Tristan Obscure Reference 494	Posted - 2015.04.01 11:28:00 - [83] - Quote Luther Mandrix wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: With the introduction of tiers of tanks of ever increasing price, the JLAV is still too effective for the price. One person in a cheap lav loaded to the gills with remotes. Think about that. OHKO. This severely hurts vehicle operators who have invested millions of SP and ISK. Push on the point? Going good. AV is hurting you as par the course, then BOOM JLAV hits and you are done. How should it do that? Why is that right? It isn't. CCP needs to make it where friendly vehicles cannot have friendly REs on them. Problem fixed. LAV go boom ,had half its hp removed and has Res that you as a tanker can detonate.And your teams small arms fire can detonate the Res .I don't see a problem. You'll notice most of the complaints are directed at the cost ADS Ramming Revenge! Plasma Cannon Rampage
Yeeeuuuupppp 986	Posted - 2015.04.01 11:38:00 - [84] - Quote dust 514 shadow wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: Problem is, they can lose around 15 LAVs before it even approaches the cost of my tank. Its not a 'bad' thing. Its a OHKO on a 1.4 million tank with over 40 million sp into it. It is solid v. tanks and infantry. This OHKO option should be fixed, or lower costs across the board on tanks. Then use cheaper tanks and shoot the lavs before they hit you. I am assuming you can use a rail gun and you have to have some lvl of awareness when tanking so....... Completely slipped my mind that railguns can 1 shot lavs now.. "This ohko option should be fixed " trololol *Sheeba Sheeba* PSN: GMANCASH "I played Dust so long i grew a f--king afro"
Lorhak Gannarsein Nos Nothi 4517	Posted - 2015.04.01 12:09:00 - [85] - Quote Juno Tristan wrote: Luther Mandrix wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: With the introduction of tiers of tanks of ever increasing price, the JLAV is still too effective for the price. One person in a cheap lav loaded to the gills with remotes. Think about that. OHKO. This severely hurts vehicle operators who have invested millions of SP and ISK. Push on the point? Going good. AV is hurting you as par the course, then BOOM JLAV hits and you are done. How should it do that? Why is that right? It isn't. CCP needs to make it where friendly vehicles cannot have friendly REs on them. Problem fixed. LAV go boom ,had half its hp removed and has Res that you as a tanker can detonate.And your teams small arms fire can detonate the Res .I don't see a problem. You'll notice most of the complaints are directed at the cost cost is fine, rebalance hardener eHP; nothing wrong with surviving that long, everything wrong with being able to do it every thirty seconds. Nobody panic! My 'like' button is fixed!
Juno Tristan Obscure Reference 494	Posted - 2015.04.01 12:24:00 - [86] - Quote Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Juno Tristan wrote: Luther Mandrix wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: With the introduction of tiers of tanks of ever increasing price, the JLAV is still too effective for the price. One person in a cheap lav loaded to the gills with remotes. Think about that. OHKO. This severely hurts vehicle operators who have invested millions of SP and ISK. Push on the point? Going good. AV is hurting you as par the course, then BOOM JLAV hits and you are done. How should it do that? Why is that right? It isn't. CCP needs to make it where friendly vehicles cannot have friendly REs on them. Problem fixed. LAV go boom ,had half its hp removed and has Res that you as a tanker can detonate.And your teams small arms fire can detonate the Res .I don't see a problem. You'll notice most of the complaints are directed at the cost cost is fine, rebalance hardener eHP; nothing wrong with surviving that long, everything wrong with being able to do it every thirty seconds. The cost of the JLAV, Zero ISK ADS Ramming Revenge! Plasma Cannon Rampage
Maiden selena MORTIMOR Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 465	Posted - 2015.04.01 12:36:00 - [87] - Quote Mary Sedillo wrote: I don't enjoy hanging back in the redline, but when a noted JLAV operator MCLOVIN is on the other side, he will do it non-stop and come ahead ISK-wise. I'll have to stay back or risk 1.4 million vs a 20,000 isk + LAV with bombs on it. Right I've got a bpo lav and a bpo logi ..shots uber cheap 40k...bye bye ant tank In dust ...ccp should nerf it i said it when I was a tanker and while I've not used this insanely cheap kamikaze rig even once yet if a tank appeared on the other side i couldnt pop i would..good think I run with sonlme of the best vehicle experts in the game or i may actually have to suicide reg mortedeamor ....i'm her slave because Amarrians are the best in the sheets #stamina
Maiden selena MORTIMOR Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 465	Posted - 2015.04.01 12:37:00 - [88] - Quote Juno Tristan wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Juno Tristan wrote: Luther Mandrix wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: With the introduction of tiers of tanks of ever increasing price, the JLAV is still too effective for the price. One person in a cheap lav loaded to the gills with remotes. Think about that. OHKO. This severely hurts vehicle operators who have invested millions of SP and ISK. Push on the point? Going good. AV is hurting you as par the course, then BOOM JLAV hits and you are done. How should it do that? Why is that right? It isn't. CCP needs to make it where friendly vehicles cannot have friendly REs on them. Problem fixed. LAV go boom ,had half its hp removed and has Res that you as a tanker can detonate.And your teams small arms fire can detonate the Res .I don't see a problem. You'll notice most of the complaints are directed at the cost cost is fine, rebalance hardener eHP; nothing wrong with surviving that long, everything wrong with being able to do it every thirty seconds. The cost of the JLAV, Zero ISK Actually it costs around 40k mortedeamor ....i'm her slave because Amarrians are the best in the sheets #stamina
KEROSIINI-TERO The Rainbow Effect 1901	Posted - 2015.04.01 13:24:00 - [89] - Quote Mary Sedillo wrote: With the introduction of tiers of tanks of ever increasing price, the JLAV is still too effective for the price. One person in a cheap lav loaded to the gills with remotes. Think about that. OHKO. This severely hurts vehicle operators who have invested millions of SP and ISK. Push on the point? Going good. AV is hurting you as par the course, then BOOM JLAV hits and you are done. How should it do that? Why is that right? It isn't. CCP needs to make it where friendly vehicles cannot have friendly REs on them. Problem fixed. Funny that you reopen the tanker's anti-JLAV QQ now, as there has been JLAV users QQ threads on how their tactic has been destroyed by decreasing the LAV HP amount. Looking at both sides of the coin. Even Aurum one.
KEROSIINI-TERO The Rainbow Effect 1902	Posted - 2015.04.01 13:35:00 - [90] - Quote Also there is no "problem" with JLAVs. I gotta say I like jihad jeeps, even from tanker's viewpoint. JLAVs are not that powerful as people with one sided experience would think. Easy to counter and even without using those counters they often just plain fail. JLAV success ratio is far less than 50%. Far. Why is that? It's not that LAVs can teleport next to you. Good tankers are aware of most vehicle deployments. LAVs can be heard and good tankers realise the risk of possible JLAV and prepare to face it. JLAV user has to do all the following: Respawn - or run - to a distant location (otherwise there is a chance LAV deplo gets busted) Vehicle quota must not be reached Has to have peaceful moment to prep REs Has to find where the tank has moved to (weak tankers stay put as turrets, good ones move) Has to approach tank preferably from rear (to avoid getting blown) Has to be lucky enough not to be blown by small arms (or sacrifice more prepping by using other player's remotes) And finally has to hit fast tank enough to detonate - easy on flat ground but very tricky on rolling terrain Above there's plenty of uncertainties or delaying factors. The whole process can take minutes, long time out of a 4-15 min matches. Even bigger now as the bug 'unsuitable location' is here. Cheap isk-wise, yes, but isk balancing is worst balancing. The biggest thing is the price in sacrificing fight time on which you could be helping your team otherwise. Looking at both sides of the coin. Even Aurum one.



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page