Can you give examples..?

Any chance to have a little AoE back (2-3 meters) with large rails?
Increased heat build up is a very huge nerf, heat sink are on high slots wich means less HP-regen-hardener, i think a little AoE would improve our experience.

back? it's been zero for many months

Myofibrals are providing the same bonus to jump height that they do to melee efficacy.

I want to do a little bit more testing on it rattati, but I believe the stacking penalty is applying correctly, it's simply the base numbers themselves being wrong/too high.

Also given that there is a vocal contingent of people that do like some of it, and myself being undecided (I think there is some emergent gameplay that can be had from these, I just think that right now the benefits drastically outweigh the drawbacks) maybe there should be some sort of equipment that allows temporary increases to jumping - ala cloak field, you hold it out and activate it and then take a second or two to swap back to regular weapon.

.

AHMG? What is the purpose of this weapon now?

It sounds like a WW1 Sten Gun, yuck. Rate of fire is so slow that a scout can run between the rounds. Even more impossible to kill the devs favorite suit. Range wasn't ganked but it is basically useless, IMHO.

Weird. Just a weird gun now.

Tanks suck. Deleted most of my setups. Upgrading the skills to get back to what I had yesterday take ~2.4M SP. I could do that math and just wait for the passive SP to puke that much up.

The R1 battle list had one perk that was worth it, everything else was a grind. I played one match and booked.

Off to Dark Souls.

Later, KR

Of Joy

I'll hold off on feed back on the AHMG until I get a few more encounters with it under my belt.... suffice to say having to relearn the Armour HAV driving model and having two LAV's of AHMG gunners on my ass cost me a few million ISK in Gv.0 this evening.

It's something that I haven't checked but has the new heat buildup on rails been applied to installations too?

It strikes me that if it has then the turrets are going to be almost useless in anti-tank engagements as a tank with a damage mod and heat sink fitted will easily be able to out gun one. Obviously a tank should be able to win the engagement but they can already out manoeuvre one and have a tactical advantage with their third person view letting them put themselves in positions to be able to hit the turret without it being able to hit them.

I just think that engaging a manned installation should be more of a calculated risk than it currently is for anything other than a milita tank. Maybe installations all need to be fitted with active heat sinks and damage mods too meaning that they're more dangerous if manned. Or just assume that they all have a permanent heat sink as they're in a fixed location so that they have a chance against a pilot who has all the toys...... unmanned rail turrets don't even shoot back when engaged at the moment.

I guess I'm saying that the basic stats of the installations should be better than the basic stats of the tank turrets (I know that they have more eHP) but that this deficit should be easily couterable by modules and good piloting. I can see things returning to the point where the installations are just early match canon fodder for the pilots as the used to be (still are).

Not a vehicle user though, and I understand their resentment of them, but if they're in the game they should be competitive now that higher tier vehicles are coming through.

Just my thoughts as a noob who sometimes finds turrets the only way to achieve anything in a match. Thanks for all the work on the game so far.

1) AHMG accuracy and range, plus heat decrease maybe

As long as vehicle turrets deal little/no splash then there's really no point in retaining the sentinel splash resistance. All it does right now is make them more or less immune to grenades and mass drivers or plasma cannon splash.

If the heavy cannon turrets splashed it'd justify keeping it IMHO.

Yeah, let us be rational and stop basing arguments in appeals to emotion or other logical fallacies and instead try basing them in facts. I believe complex myofibs are working twice as good as they are meant to (as outlined in the hotfix echo spreadsheet) and they're incredibly cheap to fit, people with them are getting massive advantages over people without and they are managing to win fights they really shouldn't because they're playing in a manner that dust514 was never ever designed to deal with.

Is it fun? Maybe to play, but not so much to play against.
Is it balanced? Jesus Christ no.
Are you petitioning hard to keep it in an unbalanced form because you gain a massive advantage from it? Yes, your bias is incredibly visible.

I have been killed by enough mass drivers recently to not want to face them without the 25% resist...

I don't think the introduction of Explosive Resistance had anything to do with Vehicle splash damage.

Take AV nades back down to 2.

600k is too expensive for something that isn't prototype.

Railgun still suffers from bugs which date back 3 years, mostly randomly overheating and firing all rounds or simply will not reload.

Railgun now overheats on the 3rd shot when it used to overheat on the 4th, it should at least go back to 4th or even 5th shot.

Missiles fire too slow to cause enough damage, either up the damage or add more in the clip.

No skill bonus on the HAV x8 skill.

PG/CPU increase on shield vehicles, still having to rely on resource modules. Infact do it for all vehicles variety is life.

Dispersion module doesn't work, no noticable difference.


Disclaimer:

The above post is respectful, contains no ranting, contains no personal attacks, contains no trolling, contains no racism, contains no discrimination, contains no profanity, contains no spamming. This post is an opinion and is related to DUST514

Large Rails have effectively been removed from the game, it is far easier to simply drive any blaster tank straight into any rail tank and hold down the fire button, reload once, and finish off said rail tank.

That said, I like where proto blaster armor tanks are right now... however, the other two turrets, and proto shield tanking, need to be brought up to the same level. If you call in a rail tank or missile tank you are doing it wrong at this point.

Shield regulators going in the lows is going to make ZERO difference, over 300 pg so I can have my crappy recharge rate start 1 seconds earlier? Makes more sense to stack more EHP as tanks spend the whole match running and hiding. At 300 pg the recharge rate needs to be doubled as well as faster.

Armor hardener duration is nearly twice as long as shields.. I would suggest increasing shield hardeners to the same duration.

I have been killed by enough mass drivers recently to not want to face them without the 25% resist...

I don't think the introduction of Explosive Resistance had anything to do with Vehicle splash damage.

Well, I am loving it and so are most of you, it seems. We will try to iron out the kinks.

1) AHMG accuracy and range, plus heat decrease maybe

2) STD AHMG ammo

3)Regulators should be low, disp stabs in high, I honestly don't understand how this happened

4)LAV fitting space bigger increase

5)Remove small turrets from SHAVS

6)A few hardwired nanohives/uplinks/proxy didn't get the buff (from bright cloud)
-Nanohives that have not received the 3X buff:
Compact nanohive and all prototype variants
-Drop uplink count has not beeing buffed by 3X but just has beeing buffed by +1
-Proto Proxy mines have a max carry count of 4 (STD/ADV have 9)

7)small blaster dispersion reduction

8) After testing a full 3 STD, 2ADV myofibs callogi, it certainly does not seem its stacking penalties are working. Instead of trying to figure that out in code, I suggest 3 max per fitting.

No, the Rattati needs none.

Nor can he afford to sleep, after the giant mess the game was left in before he came in

Since your a cat, and Rattati is a mouse pokemon, shouldn't you guys hate eachother?

Yeah, let us be rational and stop basing arguments in appeals to emotion or other logical fallacies and instead try basing them in facts. I believe complex myofibs are working twice as good as they are meant to (as outlined in the hotfix echo spreadsheet) and they're incredibly cheap to fit, people with them are getting massive advantages over people without and they are managing to win fights they really shouldn't because they're playing in a manner that dust514 was never ever designed to deal with.

Is it fun? Maybe to play, but not so much to play against.
Is it balanced? Jesus Christ no.
Are you petitioning hard to keep it in an unbalanced form because you gain a massive advantage from it? Yes, your bias is incredibly visible.