| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
5879
   |
Posted - 2014.11.15 06:50:00 -
[151] - Quote
The Tiger looks like a Minmatar version of light assault.
I get that you don't want Min/Max etc, and I don't care that weapons and the rest are standard, but I wouldn't even run that in pubs if its not dampened.
Maybe it is just the way I run my suits, but if I am going to be scanned, I am just going to run my Minmando.
If I am going to run my scout, even if it is my Quaffe, I am max dampening. I can't even begin to be effective otherwise because of shared passives that are too difficult to get rid of and lots and lots of active scanners.
I will leave my 2 HS empty just to be able to do it, because they are worthless if I am scanned.
I honestly just don't see the point of the suit other than it is a one time fixed cost. I might as well run a starter fit for free. The marginal advantage that I would get from the Apex Tiger just wouldn't be worth the Aur or time to grind the LP.
The Minmando on the other hand looks good.
Thunderbolt. verb and noun.
"James thunderbolted in his pants."
"I lit a bag of thunderbolt on fire on CCP's doorway"
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
2372
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 06:53:00 -
[152] - Quote
Rattati, do you think 100k loyalty points is a little steep? That's playing FW non-stop for months, 15-20 matches a day just to get one suit. Your ranking with the other factions will go down the toilet while you build up for just one.
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
duster 35000
Algintal Core
Gallente Federation
100
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 06:56:00 -
[153] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Dear Players, As I have heard a lot of complaints about the fitting, I would like reiterate the following: We don't want the best of the best min-maxed PC fittings We want Faction Doctrine over utility, while remaining very useful We don't want triple stacking and penalties We don't want ultra ehp stacking We want to expose players to versatility, so as many weapons as possible We also asked the community, the CPM collected a variety of ideas from Logis/Scouts and we took a lot of ideas from the Faction fitting thread. Please read it carefully, and again if you skimmed. This is all explained in detail in the blog. http://dust514.com/news/2014/11/introducing-apex-series-bpo-dropsuits/The reason we didn't push them all out at once, was testing and also to be able to collect feedback on the way. Please comment on the fittings found here: APEX FittingsWith the "name" of the suit (serpent, etc), the gear and the proposed replacement gear. Thanks!
the caldari assault high slot fitting is absolutely terrible.
Std precision enhancer? Eenope.
std light damage mod? Eenope.
So that leaves the assault with only 1 energizer and 1 less extender, the point is to assault, frontlines combat, scouts are the passive scans...no one in a competitive match will use a precision enhancer on a cao assault...
Choo Choo
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
2372
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 06:58:00 -
[154] - Quote
CommanderBolt wrote:The thing I don't get is, are these suits not counter to everything New Eden and DUST514 / EVE are about? No customisation possible. That's not what we play this game for.
Everyone will have their own fit that they like, why not just limit the suits to only accepting standard modules? So at least then we can fit them as we so please?
Nobody told you you had to get them.
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
2372
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 06:59:00 -
[155] - Quote
duster 35000 wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:Dear Players, As I have heard a lot of complaints about the fitting, I would like reiterate the following: We don't want the best of the best min-maxed PC fittings We want Faction Doctrine over utility, while remaining very useful We don't want triple stacking and penalties We don't want ultra ehp stacking We want to expose players to versatility, so as many weapons as possible We also asked the community, the CPM collected a variety of ideas from Logis/Scouts and we took a lot of ideas from the Faction fitting thread. Please read it carefully, and again if you skimmed. This is all explained in detail in the blog. http://dust514.com/news/2014/11/introducing-apex-series-bpo-dropsuits/The reason we didn't push them all out at once, was testing and also to be able to collect feedback on the way. Please comment on the fittings found here: APEX FittingsWith the "name" of the suit (serpent, etc), the gear and the proposed replacement gear. Thanks! the caldari assault high slot fitting is absolutely terrible. Std precision enhancer? Eenope. std light damage mod? Eenope. So that leaves the assault with only 1 energizer and 1 less extender, the point is to assault, frontlines combat, scouts are the passive scans...no one in a competitive match will use a precision enhancer on a cao assault...
I use precision enhancers on a few assault suits.
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
duster 35000
Algintal Core
Gallente Federation
100
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 07:02:00 -
[156] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:duster 35000 wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:Dear Players, As I have heard a lot of complaints about the fitting, I would like reiterate the following: We don't want the best of the best min-maxed PC fittings We want Faction Doctrine over utility, while remaining very useful We don't want triple stacking and penalties We don't want ultra ehp stacking We want to expose players to versatility, so as many weapons as possible We also asked the community, the CPM collected a variety of ideas from Logis/Scouts and we took a lot of ideas from the Faction fitting thread. Please read it carefully, and again if you skimmed. This is all explained in detail in the blog. http://dust514.com/news/2014/11/introducing-apex-series-bpo-dropsuits/The reason we didn't push them all out at once, was testing and also to be able to collect feedback on the way. Please comment on the fittings found here: APEX FittingsWith the "name" of the suit (serpent, etc), the gear and the proposed replacement gear. Thanks! the caldari assault high slot fitting is absolutely terrible. Std precision enhancer? Eenope. std light damage mod? Eenope. So that leaves the assault with only 1 energizer and 1 less extender, the point is to assault, frontlines combat, scouts are the passive scans...no one in a competitive match will use a precision enhancer on a cao assault... I use precision enhancers on a few assault suits.
CALDARI assault...not amarr assault or gal assault...seriously the high module choice for the cal assault was ruined, I don't care if it will be the supposed meta, scouts already do it and everyone it litten up in competitive matches anyway...zero point.
Choo Choo
|
Liara Kaiba
Shadow Broker Wet Squad
12
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 10:55:00 -
[157] - Quote
The fit may be interesting (for a BPO) but this so overpriced, I will never buy it. I'm not sinking 100k LP into 1 suit, this is just crazy. |
CommanderBolt
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
2455
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 13:57:00 -
[158] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:CommanderBolt wrote:The thing I don't get is, are these suits not counter to everything New Eden and DUST514 / EVE are about? No customisation possible. That's not what we play this game for.
Everyone will have their own fit that they like, why not just limit the suits to only accepting standard modules? So at least then we can fit them as we so please? Nobody told you you had to get them.
Good old Spkr, missing the point entirely as per usual.
"Also I think knives are a good idea, big f**k-off shiny ones"
"Guns for show, Knives for a pro"
MY LIFE FOR AIUR!
|
Kaze Eyrou
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
944
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 15:28:00 -
[159] - Quote
Ah, this is where the thread went...
I made a thread when I found out about APEX suits not being able to be renamed.
Is this intended? What's the reasoning behind it? If not, could the option to rename be un-grayed out?
However, I have heard the 'Shaman' Logi equipment layout is exactly how I have it on my LogiBro setups. Perfect just the way it is! 
CB Vet // Logi Bro // @KazeEyrou
CIO ("Proto Forum Warrior")
Learning Coalition & RTG
|
Booby Tuesdays
Tuesdays With Boobies
980
|
Posted - 2014.11.16 05:50:00 -
[160] - Quote
Now that I think about it, my final request is for the 'Shaman' Logi to have a Mass Driver replace the ACR. Please bring back the need and desire to be a true support MD Logi!!! 
No Shave November Applies To Your Face Only!!!
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |