Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
da GAND
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
953
|
Posted - 2014.11.08 03:17:00 -
[31] - Quote
Gareth Verenar wrote:da GAND wrote:Void Echo wrote:They should port it to ps4 if they are able to, at the moment with no good fps games (destiny and cod aside) Dust 514 or "Legion" could potentially double CCP's revenue for profit by extending it to another platform, however, ever since they bulled their own "xbone" blunder when announcing legion, it would be hard to convince players on console to actually trust CCP still after what they did.
By alienating a certain platform or demographic, every company either gaming or non has always found themselves without funding and essentially hated to the point where they often apologize and eventually allow more people to use their products which in turn gives them more money.
if legion were to go on ps4, it would be one of the best decisions CCP has ever made, regardless of the "PC Elitists" dogma and mindset. It would potentially increase EVE Online's playerbase ten fold by introducing it to the console market seriously this time increasing CCP's revenue from EVE Online itself, after all, before Dust 514 ever came out, no console player had ever even heard of EVE Online.
If you want to keep EVE Online the way it is with less than half the playerbase of every individual COD game or even WoW then go ahead and keep it for PC only, just don't complain when nobody will play with you because its only for your kind. Again it's not about PC elitists, it's about Legions development not being held back mostly by hardware limitations of the current consoles. Sure it would be smart to get it out on the ps4 for more $$ but the game will survive on the PC. As long as people don't just see it as another f2p shooter on the PC. Dust should've been on the PC in the first place, Dust would've been so much further than it is now. You mean the hardware limitations that are still in place due to having to be optimized for lower-midrange spec PCs that are equal to, slightly better, and/or slightly worse than PS4 spec-wise? Meanwhile the PS4 has less background processes and a smaller-footprint OS that would otherwise drag performance down? Let's not kid ourselves, there is no real hardware limitation on PS4 that isn't already a limitation on certain mid-range PC builds (some of which are worse than PS4), and those will be compensated for anyway.
The ps4 hardware isn't horrible and ya it can equal or surpass a low to mid gaming pc by a bit but that's where it's stuck at forever. Ya they'll be able to do tweaks to it with software updates but that's it.
Now I am not saying that the ps4 won't be able to run what we saw at fanfest with stuff we have in dust (connectiong to eve, weapons, vehicles) but improved because I'm sure it will. Plus they are also using the same engine which is supposedly a heavily modified unreal 3 engine. But how far can they go?
Will we be able to have huge battles with huge and open maps, like 64 vs 64 or possibly more? Walk around in stations with EVE players? Be able to travel around on a planet outside of combat? I'm not sure what CCP is able to do when it comes to achieving that original vision they had with dust when working with the ps4 hardware but it's stuck with the hardware it's got and at some point they would be stuck because of the ps4 hardware while hardware for PC's keep on improving yearly or a little less than a year.
Supporter of EVE LEGION
|
Ender Storm
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
180
|
Posted - 2014.11.08 12:44:00 -
[32] - Quote
Meee One wrote:It would be wise to.
Currently ps4 users are starved for good games. For example:after playing Blacklight retribution on the ps4,i kept coming back to Dust 514 on the ps3. It feels more full,and not just a hollow shell like retribution did.
Currently ps4 has several F2P titles: -DCUO (super heros) -War thunder (realistic war vehicles) -Blacklight retribution (generic TDM game) -War frame (an ugly team game)
And that's it... Most people playing those games are only doing so because they have no other options.
If Dust were to transfer to ps4 while it's still relatively new,it would snatch many of those players away from their competition. Probably for keeps.
And could gain a potentially ravenous following via the built in streaming available through ps4. Dust would generate a satisfaction through difficulty that those other games simply couldn't compete with.
I get what you mean with retribution, but the gunplay and flow seems better than what I remember Dust offering, even though Retribution is a generic shooter. Wish Legion would have the same level of performance at least.
Ah, Warthunder is great, I play on PC and the cross platform is nice, ps4 players are competitive enough. |
lateris ablon
Commando Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.11.08 14:21:00 -
[33] - Quote
Auris Lionesse wrote:yes, months ago before legion was even announced i said ccp would start over on a new platform and fire shanghai.
i was right about starting over on a new platform, though i meant ps4 at the time and i still believe it should. shooters belong on consoles, eve belongs on pcs. keyboard and mouse sucks for shooters.
I think there is room for both to co exist together to build community and a healthy competition. If Sony opened the door for an emulator (59.99 USD) for the PC to be sold at the price of a game that would run on Windows I think the cross platform solution might be resolved and become profitable for everyone, despite the fact that the PS4 is an X86 which is a PC. I was really surprised that Sony didn't choose a more high end video card for the PS4 but I am sure there is a reason for that from a design perspective.
ATC
|
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics
4498
|
Posted - 2014.11.11 15:37:00 -
[34] - Quote
Long term it would be beneficial for CCP to expand to another platform and group of people. Short term, it makes sense for them to stick with PC becuase they are better at that (PS3 is notoriously hard to program for) and can't take the chance of failing again.
But don't waste anyone's time with the argument about "hardware limitations". The lack of power is not what held this game back. Take Destiny. For all it's flaws it handles large numbers of simultaneous players from different regions, even while they are doing different PvE missions, crossing paths in the same maps/environments, and somehow manages to not lag and have working hit detection. Sorcery!
It was shoddy programming, pure and simple. If you want to blame the vagaries of the cell processor, that's fair, but it's not because the PS3 is "weak", and the argument also does not apply to the PS4 with it's more conventional architecture.
More importantly, if you put Dust on a top of the line gaming PC, that PC is not going to automatically balance the game. It won't prevent cloaked shotty scouts from being OP, nor will it introduce Amarr HAV's or Gallente heavy weapons. Only CCP can do that.
(The godfather of tactical logistics)
|
da GAND
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
962
|
Posted - 2014.11.11 19:57:00 -
[35] - Quote
John Demonsbane wrote:Long term it would be beneficial for CCP to expand to another platform and group of people. Short term, it makes sense for them to stick with PC becuase they are better at that (PS3 is notoriously hard to program for) and can't take the chance of failing again.
But don't waste anyone's time with the argument about "hardware limitations". The lack of power is not what held this game back. Take Destiny. For all it's flaws it handles large numbers of simultaneous players from different regions, even while they are doing different PvE missions, crossing paths in the same maps/environments, and somehow manages to not lag and have working hit detection. Sorcery!
It was shoddy programming, pure and simple. If you want to blame the vagaries of the cell processor, that's fair, but it's not because the PS3 is "weak", and the argument also does not apply to the PS4 with it's more conventional architecture.
More importantly, if you put Dust on a top of the line gaming PC, that PC is not going to automatically balance the game. It won't prevent cloaked shotty scouts from being OP, nor will it introduce Amarr HAV's or Gallente heavy weapons. Only CCP can do that.
I don't believe that CCP can reach that vision they had with Dust 514 on the ps3, they might with the ps4 however it will get stuck at a certain point until the next console generation ( if there even is one) .
And obviously putting Dust on the PC isn't going to automatically solve every problem, CCP has to put the work in to balance the game and get it to where it would be right now if it was on PC only in the first place.
Should Legion be on the ps4?
|
Bendtner92
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
2217
|
Posted - 2014.11.11 20:28:00 -
[36] - Quote
da GAND wrote:I don't believe that CCP can reach that vision they had with Dust 514 on the ps3. Of course they can't, which is why it's mindboggling they didn't have the PS4 in mind from the get go and just treated the PS3 version as a beta.
Winner of the EU Squad Cup & the closed beta Tester's Tournament.
Go Go Power Rangers!
R.I.P MAG.
|
da GAND
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
962
|
Posted - 2014.11.11 20:52:00 -
[37] - Quote
Bendtner92 wrote:da GAND wrote:I don't believe that CCP can reach that vision they had with Dust 514 on the ps3. Of course they can't, which is why it's mindboggling they didn't have the PS4 in mind from the get go and just treated the PS3 version as a beta.
Ya ik everyone had the ps4 in mind, but PC development will go much faster and maybe from their perspective if they can get more progress done on the PC than they would if they were to develop for the ps4 they can get the game to where it should've been by now and get a ps4 port going with all the progress that's been made.
Should Legion be on the ps4?
|
CYRAX SERVIUS
Death Firm.
1927
|
Posted - 2014.11.11 21:42:00 -
[38] - Quote
Wow, this thread, arguing over PC or PS4 for legion, is it officially in development? Or are you arguing over pure speculation based on "if" still.
What are the specs on system requirements for this game?
You probably don't know cause they DON"T EXIST!!!!!
Stop arguing over something that probably won't happen...
I am Dust Free, found fun in gaming again,
Destiny, hell yes, Planetside2? Makes dust look like what it is, crap.
|
da GAND
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
962
|
Posted - 2014.11.12 00:23:00 -
[39] - Quote
CYRAX SERVIUS wrote:Wow, this thread, arguing over PC or PS4 for legion, is it officially in development? Or are you arguing over pure speculation based on "if" still.
What are the specs on system requirements for this game?
You probably don't know cause they DON"T EXIST!!!!!
Stop arguing over something that probably won't happen...
All we can do is speculate about what may happen with Legion, and I don't see a problem with talking about this.
Should Legion be on the ps4?
|
Void Echo
Total Extinction
2742
|
Posted - 2014.11.12 03:47:00 -
[40] - Quote
da GAND wrote:Gareth Verenar wrote:da GAND wrote:Void Echo wrote:They should port it to ps4 if they are able to, at the moment with no good fps games (destiny and cod aside) Dust 514 or "Legion" could potentially double CCP's revenue for profit by extending it to another platform, however, ever since they bulled their own "xbone" blunder when announcing legion, it would be hard to convince players on console to actually trust CCP still after what they did.
By alienating a certain platform or demographic, every company either gaming or non has always found themselves without funding and essentially hated to the point where they often apologize and eventually allow more people to use their products which in turn gives them more money.
if legion were to go on ps4, it would be one of the best decisions CCP has ever made, regardless of the "PC Elitists" dogma and mindset. It would potentially increase EVE Online's playerbase ten fold by introducing it to the console market seriously this time increasing CCP's revenue from EVE Online itself, after all, before Dust 514 ever came out, no console player had ever even heard of EVE Online.
If you want to keep EVE Online the way it is with less than half the playerbase of every individual COD game or even WoW then go ahead and keep it for PC only, just don't complain when nobody will play with you because its only for your kind. Again it's not about PC elitists, it's about Legions development not being held back mostly by hardware limitations of the current consoles. Sure it would be smart to get it out on the ps4 for more $$ but the game will survive on the PC. As long as people don't just see it as another f2p shooter on the PC. Dust should've been on the PC in the first place, Dust would've been so much further than it is now. You mean the hardware limitations that are still in place due to having to be optimized for lower-midrange spec PCs that are equal to, slightly better, and/or slightly worse than PS4 spec-wise? Meanwhile the PS4 has less background processes and a smaller-footprint OS that would otherwise drag performance down? Let's not kid ourselves, there is no real hardware limitation on PS4 that isn't already a limitation on certain mid-range PC builds (some of which are worse than PS4), and those will be compensated for anyway. The ps4 hardware isn't horrible and ya it can equal or surpass a low to mid gaming pc by a bit but that's where it's stuck at forever. Ya they'll be able to do tweaks to it with software updates but that's it. Now I am not saying that the ps4 won't be able to run what we saw at fanfest with stuff we have in dust (connectiong to eve, weapons, vehicles) but improved because I'm sure it will. Plus they are also using the same engine which is supposedly a heavily modified unreal 3 engine. But how far can they go? Will we be able to have huge battles with huge and open maps, more than 64 players? Walk around in stations with EVE players? Be able to travel around on a planet outside of combat? I'm not sure what CCP is able to do when it comes to achieving that original vision they had with dust when working with the ps4 hardware but it's stuck with the hardware it's got and at some point they would be stuck because of the ps4 hardware while hardware for PC's keep on improving yearly or a little less than a year. Basically they won't get stuck if they stick to the PC
battlefield was able to put over 80 players in a single match almost daily on the ps3, its not a hardware limitation, its a game developer problem, if you have a high tech piece of equipment that can crack the code for the united states super computer and you give it to a bachelor at ITT tech, they would have a ******* clue on how to use it because they don't know **** about it, but if you give it to the united states government, then theyl turn it into the next super computer.
its not the console that's the problem, its the people that refuse to work with the console that's the problem.
Closed Beta Vet.
Helix-Void_Echo
Until you know the pain I know, you'll never understand why I see man the way I do.
|
|
da GAND
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
971
|
Posted - 2014.11.12 06:09:00 -
[41] - Quote
@ voidecho. What are u talking about? On the ps3 there was only 32 players max in each match. On the ps4 64 players were able to be in a match.
Should Legion be on the ps4?
|
Void Echo
Total Extinction
2743
|
Posted - 2014.11.13 03:35:00 -
[42] - Quote
da GAND wrote:@ voidecho. What are u talking about? On the ps3 there was only 32 players max in each match. On the ps4 64 players were able to be in a match.
not what I heard, but regardless, do you really believe that its because of hardware and not developer incompetence?
Closed Beta Vet.
Helix-Void_Echo
Until you know the pain I know, you'll never understand why I see man the way I do.
|
Avinash Decker
Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic
150
|
Posted - 2014.11.13 04:42:00 -
[43] - Quote
MAG gets 256 players , Killzone gets 32 players , BF gets 24 players , Frontline fuel of war is 50 players on the map. On the ps4 BF4 is 64 players , planetside 2 has 2000 players on the map( if it comes out which it should later this year), Wild is big as Europe , and GTA 5 on ps4 is 32 players. Theres defiance, but I don't know how many max players there can be It depends what the devs want from the game .
Anyway don't think anyone here or even CCP entirely knows how exactly Legion is supposed to be played. Basically, CCP said they want Dust to be a "sandbox" and be integrated to eve , but how exactly is it suppose play and designed out ? CCP talk a lot about ideas , but hardly said exactly how everything is suppose to play out I think. Is it suppose to be like open world like borderlands, like planetside, or like Dayz with instances and limited number of players?Whats going to be client side or server side? I don't think anyone really knows probably the reason they hardly attempted to apply it to Dust and why they hardly talking about it now. If anyone knows then anyone can argue what would be possible on the ps3 , pc , or ps4. |
da GAND
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
971
|
Posted - 2014.11.13 05:18:00 -
[44] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:da GAND wrote:@ voidecho. What are u talking about? On the ps3 there was only 32 players max in each match. On the ps4 64 players were able to be in a match. not what I heard, but regardless, do you really believe that its because of hardware and not developer incompetence?
Well I got bf4 for the ps3 and 32 per match was the limit.
Seems to me it's both the hardware and the lack of experience of the developers programming for the ps3
Should Legion be on the ps4?
|
tastzlike chicken
ROGUE SPADES
286
|
Posted - 2014.11.20 15:00:00 -
[45] - Quote
SuperMido wrote:
... CCP is the Dev and publisher of their own games. Of course they look for profit, but thats not what they aim for mainly like other companies out there. They're ore about their game, and community..
I just threw-up Kool-aid. -so strange, I haven't had any for months...
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
|
Void Echo
Total Extinction
2743
|
Posted - 2014.11.22 06:40:00 -
[46] - Quote
da GAND wrote:Void Echo wrote:da GAND wrote:@ voidecho. What are u talking about? On the ps3 there was only 32 players max in each match. On the ps4 64 players were able to be in a match. not what I heard, but regardless, do you really believe that its because of hardware and not developer incompetence? Well I got bf4 for the ps3 and 32 per match was the limit. Seems to me it's both the hardware and the lack of experience of the developers programming for the ps3
actually its laziness, theres an article somewhere on one of the gaming news sites (forgot where, haven't checked in 3 years) that said most companies that get contracts with both sony and Microsoft for the games to be released on both platforms don't want to take the time it takes to make something look good on ps3 when itl only take 5 months on xbox, ps3 hardware more advanced, but developers are lazy as ****.
Closed Beta Vet.
Helix-Void_Echo
Until you know the pain I know, you'll never understand why I see man the way I do.
|
da GAND
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
990
|
Posted - 2014.11.22 14:24:00 -
[47] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:da GAND wrote:Void Echo wrote:da GAND wrote:@ voidecho. What are u talking about? On the ps3 there was only 32 players max in each match. On the ps4 64 players were able to be in a match. not what I heard, but regardless, do you really believe that its because of hardware and not developer incompetence? Well I got bf4 for the ps3 and 32 per match was the limit. Seems to me it's both the hardware and the lack of experience of the developers programming for the ps3 actually its laziness, theres an article somewhere on one of the gaming news sites (forgot where, haven't checked in 3 years) that said most companies that get contracts with both sony and Microsoft for the games to be released on both platforms don't want to take the time it takes to make something look good on ps3 when itl only take 5 months on xbox, ps3 hardware more advanced, but developers are lazy as ****.
Laziness or maybe newer devs just aren't trained to be working on consoles but have an idea of how to do it?
I'm not sure but anyways the hardware is still and always will be an issue. Being stuck with this one box that will only improve software wise and devs having to go through the company that owns the software on that box really seems like too much to deal with.
Should Legion be on the ps4?
|
Void Echo
Total Extinction
2744
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 00:18:00 -
[48] - Quote
da GAND wrote:Void Echo wrote:da GAND wrote:Void Echo wrote:da GAND wrote:@ voidecho. What are u talking about? On the ps3 there was only 32 players max in each match. On the ps4 64 players were able to be in a match. not what I heard, but regardless, do you really believe that its because of hardware and not developer incompetence? Well I got bf4 for the ps3 and 32 per match was the limit. Seems to me it's both the hardware and the lack of experience of the developers programming for the ps3 actually its laziness, theres an article somewhere on one of the gaming news sites (forgot where, haven't checked in 3 years) that said most companies that get contracts with both sony and Microsoft for the games to be released on both platforms don't want to take the time it takes to make something look good on ps3 when itl only take 5 months on xbox, ps3 hardware more advanced, but developers are lazy as ****. Laziness or maybe newer devs just aren't trained to be working on consoles but have an idea of how to do it? I'm not sure but anyways the hardware is still and always will be an issue. Being stuck with this one box that will only improve software wise and devs having to go through the company that owns the software on that box really seems like too much to deal with.
if that's the case then over half the pc games shouldn't even exist on console, yet we have millions of pc games that are perfectly operational on consoles.
Closed Beta Vet.
Until you know the pain I live with, you'll never understand why I see man the way I do.
|
da GAND
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
991
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 03:29:00 -
[49] - Quote
@ voidecho Well even if they aren't as trained on how to exactly get games working on consoles they might have an idea and it might not take long on learning how to get it set over for a console. But anyways that part is all speculation to me.
But the second part in my previous response where I said being stuck with a box that hardly improves over time and having to go through the company that designed and sold it is still a big issue to me. CCP has had to go through Sony just to update Dust which costs them time and supposedly money. It'd probably be much more time and money just to have Legion on both PC and ps4.
Now they may or may not have to go through much with PC, with EVE they have a client for people to download from their website. Downloading from Steam is optional but not required to play EVE, only reason I can see people downloading EVE from Steam is if they use Steam for all their games.
When it comes down to hardware they have nearly no limit, only limit is how much a PC gamer will spend to upgrade to Play Legion. Look at Star Citizen, the group that's developing that game is gonna make nearly everyone upgrade their rig because of how massive the game is gonna be. They are only making it for PC because of exactly what I said they aren't being held back by the hardware setup by some company in a box that won't improve much. http://www.dsogaming.com/interviews/cloud-imperium-on-star-citizen-mods-pc-exclusivity-graphical-features-directx12-multi-core-cpus/. Read the second paragraph of what the interviewee said.
There isn't much more else I can or need to add to this response but here is one last thing and this is my opinion.
Consoles are bought by those who want gaming simple, so keep it simple for them. Games like Legion and Star Citizen aren't simple games so give those games to those who don't mind compilation added to their gaming experience(PC gamers).
Should Legion be on the ps4?
|
McFurious
TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback
800
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 14:17:00 -
[50] - Quote
Quote:Should Legion come to the ps4 also?
Nah. Then we'll have to listen to them ***** about getting rekt by mouse users and they'll want to gimp the KBM all over again so their potato thumbsticks have a chance.
Seriously, peasants, you have plenty of time before this game ever comes out. Get a job, save your pennies, build a reasonably priced PC. It's not that hard and it's very worth it.
Half Irish. Often angry.
Grizzled Masshole Closed Beta Vet
PC > Console
|
|
da GAND
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
991
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 14:27:00 -
[51] - Quote
McFurious wrote:Quote:Should Legion come to the ps4 also? Nah. Then we'll have to listen to them ***** about getting rekt by mouse users and they'll want to gimp the KBM all over again so their potato thumbsticks have a chance. Seriously, peasants, you have plenty of time before this game ever comes out. Get a job, save your pennies, build a reasonably priced PC. It's not that hard and it's very worth it.
I'd prefer to call them simpler gamers instead of peasants lol, but you're right it isn't that hard to figure out how to build a PC and even though it will most likely cost more than a ps4 it's worth it.
Should Legion be on the ps4?
|
McFurious
TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback
801
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 15:04:00 -
[52] - Quote
da GAND wrote:McFurious wrote:Quote:Should Legion come to the ps4 also? Nah. Then we'll have to listen to them ***** about getting rekt by mouse users and they'll want to gimp the KBM all over again so their potato thumbsticks have a chance. Seriously, peasants, you have plenty of time before this game ever comes out. Get a job, save your pennies, build a reasonably priced PC. It's not that hard and it's very worth it. I'd prefer to call them simpler gamers instead of peasants lol, but you're right it isn't that hard to figure out how to build a PC and even though it will most likely cost more than a ps4 it's worth it.
Fair enough. It just irritates me that they can't seem to grasp the simple reason why their Simplestation 4 can't do what PC's do.
Even if they port it over, they said they weren't going to until they get it working on PC. So thats time until release on PC + time to get it all working like they want it to + time it takes to port it over. So that's probably somewhere around 2018 or later. And that's assuming development by CCP goes smoothly lmfao.
Half Irish. Often angry.
Grizzled Masshole Closed Beta Vet
PC > Console
|
lateriss
ObscuriLateris
11
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 17:20:00 -
[53] - Quote
It looks great on the PC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFOepBdTgx0 |
da GAND
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
991
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 20:30:00 -
[54] - Quote
yes I did say that on my first post, and it'll definitely look better in the future if it stays on the PC
Should Legion be on the ps4?
|
DaReaperPW
Net 7
34
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 20:57:00 -
[55] - Quote
TL;DR so if this was said i appoligise for repeating
No.
That all.. jk
The reason why i say no, is that i think CCP an into some roadblocks trying to merge dust and eve together. Its one of these things that you can only gain from experence, and if you don;t try you can;t see it. Also i have heard that Sony was a pita when it came to patches. And, honestly, if Legion and EvE are both on pc, and under ccp's complete control, then the 6 week release cycle that eve has can easily be ported to legion and you would have vibrant and fast updates for legion at the same time that you do for eve. Now add in the fact that valk is on pc.. then you can see that doing everything on pc, maybe with it all on TQ would make managment and patching and eventually combining of all things, so much easier in the long run.
You also kill a middle man, who might say 'you know CCP, we don;t want you to have the abilty to do this because we really don;t want to allow non PS users access to this." or whatever
So again.. no |
da GAND
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
991
|
Posted - 2014.11.24 21:26:00 -
[56] - Quote
DaReaperPW wrote:TL;DR so if this was said i appoligise for repeating
No.
That all.. jk
The reason why i say no, is that i think CCP an into some roadblocks trying to merge dust and eve together. Its one of these things that you can only gain from experence, and if you don;t try you can;t see it. Also i have heard that Sony was a pita when it came to patches. And, honestly, if Legion and EvE are both on pc, and under ccp's complete control, then the 6 week release cycle that eve has can easily be ported to legion and you would have vibrant and fast updates for legion at the same time that you do for eve. Now add in the fact that valk is on pc.. then you can see that doing everything on pc, maybe with it all on TQ would make managment and patching and eventually combining of all things, so much easier in the long run.
You also kill a middle man, who might say 'you know CCP, we don;t want you to have the abilty to do this because we really don;t want to allow non PS users access to this." or whatever
So again.. no
I don't think that has been mentioned here but in other areas of the forums awhile ago. I agree with what you said cuz it makes sense, they don't have to go through Sony and any middle man that would delay CCP updating Legion or prevent certain things from being in the game cuz of bs excuses.
Should Legion be on the ps4?
|
Avinash Decker
Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic
154
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 05:25:00 -
[57] - Quote
da GAND wrote:@ voidecho Well even if they aren't as trained on how to exactly get games working on consoles they might have an idea and it might not take long on learning how to get it set over for a console. But anyways that part is all speculation to me. But the second part in my previous response where I said being stuck with a box that hardly improves over time and having to go through the company that designed and sold it is still a big issue to me. CCP has had to go through Sony just to update Dust which costs them time and supposedly money. It'd probably be much more time and money just to have Legion on both PC and ps4. Now they may or may not have to go through much with PC, with EVE they have a client for people to download from their website. Downloading from Steam is optional but not required to play EVE, only reason I can see people downloading EVE from Steam is if they use Steam for all their games. When it comes down to hardware they have nearly no limit, only limit is how much a PC gamer will spend to upgrade to Play Legion. Look at Star Citizen, the group that's developing that game is gonna make nearly everyone upgrade their rig because of how massive the game is gonna be. They are only making it for PC because of exactly what I said they aren't being held back by the hardware setup by some company in a box that won't improve much. http://www.dsogaming.com/interviews/cloud-imperium-on-star-citizen-mods-pc-exclusivity-graphical-features-directx12-multi-core-cpus/. Read the second paragraph of what the interviewee said. There isn't much more else I can or need to add to this response but here is one last thing and this is my opinion. Consoles are bought by those who want gaming simple, so keep it simple for them. Games like Legion and Star Citizen aren't simple games so give those games to those who don't mind compilation added to their gaming experience(PC gamers).
You don't even know how Legion is going to exactly play out in terms of gameplay mechanics or features . So calling it a simple or complex game doesn't mean much . For all you know CCP will make these game run of low end hardware . CCP basically saying it the Legion supposedly going to be a "sandbox game" without saying how much it will actually be one and we or CCP does not even know if it will ship as one. There as not been a really large scale sandbox FPS nearly all of them has forms of instances or a low maximum amount of players. Star citizen is no expectation. Which is a different issue, since that game focus heavily on graphics fidelity, attention to detail, textures like every ship having a very detailed interior that is streamless to transition to, and very high levels of immersion . |
Joseph Ridgeson
WarRavens Capital Punishment.
2743
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 11:22:00 -
[58] - Quote
If they can pull of PC and PS4 being on the same servers, yes. If not, then I wonder if it is worth it.
DUST is a VERY small community, for a few reasons. The game is not as good at being a fast FPS compared to other games, it never got a lot of marketing, and the primary community that would be interested to try it because they play EVE may not have a console. I think splitting that community up even more but adding a probable influx of EVE players to the PC Legion is really unhealthy for the PS4.
"This is B.S! This is B.S! I paid money! Cash money, dollars money, cash money!"
|
da GAND
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
995
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 14:28:00 -
[59] - Quote
Avinash Decker wrote:da GAND wrote:@ voidecho Well even if they aren't as trained on how to exactly get games working on consoles they might have an idea and it might not take long on learning how to get it set over for a console. But anyways that part is all speculation to me. But the second part in my previous response where I said being stuck with a box that hardly improves over time and having to go through the company that designed and sold it is still a big issue to me. CCP has had to go through Sony just to update Dust which costs them time and supposedly money. It'd probably be much more time and money just to have Legion on both PC and ps4. Now they may or may not have to go through much with PC, with EVE they have a client for people to download from their website. Downloading from Steam is optional but not required to play EVE, only reason I can see people downloading EVE from Steam is if they use Steam for all their games. When it comes down to hardware they have nearly no limit, only limit is how much a PC gamer will spend to upgrade to Play Legion. Look at Star Citizen, the group that's developing that game is gonna make nearly everyone upgrade their rig because of how massive the game is gonna be. They are only making it for PC because of exactly what I said they aren't being held back by the hardware setup by some company in a box that won't improve much. http://www.dsogaming.com/interviews/cloud-imperium-on-star-citizen-mods-pc-exclusivity-graphical-features-directx12-multi-core-cpus/. Read the second paragraph of what the interviewee said. There isn't much more else I can or need to add to this response but here is one last thing and this is my opinion. Consoles are bought by those who want gaming simple, so keep it simple for them. Games like Legion and Star Citizen aren't simple games so give those games to those who don't mind compilation added to their gaming experience(PC gamers). You don't even know how Legion is going to exactly play out in terms of gameplay mechanics or features . So calling it a simple or complex game doesn't mean much . For all you know CCP will make these game run of low end hardware . CCP basically saying it the Legion supposedly going to be a "sandbox game" without saying how much it will actually be one and we or CCP does not even know if it will ship as one. There as not been a really large scale sandbox FPS nearly all of them has forms of instances or a low maximum amount of players. Star citizen is no expectation. Which is a different issue, since that game focus heavily on graphics fidelity, attention to detail, textures like every ship having a very detailed interior that is streamless to transition to, and very high levels of immersion .
True I don't know what the hardware requirements will be for Legion but if gets put on the ps4 all CCP will be able to do is optimize the **** out of it. And then their is Sony which is supposedly hard to deal with, I don't know anything about how CCP dealt with Sony when it came to updating Dust514 but the only thing I've heard is bad stuff.
Now wilI Legion be as complicated for new players as Dust was for new players? I hope so, I don't mean CCP not providing an actual tutorial but I mean people that are new to seeing so many options in a shooter. The things from EVE mattering to players such as space security lvs ( low sec, high sec, null sec and wormhole space) and all the affects of there being a certain amount or no security that Legion players may or may not need to worry about all the time. Keeping stock of their fits via the market or maybe never buying anything off the market and just using anything they salvage? Getting transport to certain areas that doesn't have a warbarge that you can't clone jump to like you would for public contracts and maybe getting killed along the way cuz the EVE pilot transporting you didn't know what he was getting into lol. And obviously more things but I'm in a rush here but I'm sure you can figure out the rest from here. I'll be back in a few hours lol.
I used Star Citizen as an example of what I meant of devs not being held back by the hardware that's been set in a console for its life cycle.
Should Legion be on the ps4?
|
Void Echo
Total Extinction
2748
|
Posted - 2014.11.27 03:29:00 -
[60] - Quote
point being simple from the pc elitists "hardware limitations", our point being simple "we don't give a ****, CCP will make much more money by going onto console at the same time, especially since there are no big hits for the next gen consoles yet, so this would give ccp a massive head start at profits if they go to ps4".
saying that console gamers should quit whining and buy a pc is just ******** and ignorant, your kind are the reason pc elitists are so hated. why don't you just buy a ******* controller so you don't have to complain about your kb/m not being supported well enough on a console game?
double standard.
if CCP never releases it for the ps4, they should also take Valkyrie with them.
Closed Beta Vet.
Until you know the pain I live with, you'll never understand why I see man the way I do.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |