DUST Search - How infantry want vehicles to be

All Channels

General Discussions

How infantry want vehicles to be

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Soulja Ghostface 2633	Posted - 2014.08.24 04:32:00 - [1] - Quote 500k-700k in isk asset that shoot kisses and drive around the field to be instaganked by rifles. It really is pathetic how people with no turret game, Who don't even deserve to touch the steering wheel of a single dropship or tank, With no sp in vehicles, Never had their wallet kick them in the balls (If they had any), Never massacred dropsuits with a large rail, Never flew a dropship for more then 5 minutes without exploding, Who never saw the sexy red glow of a cannon turret, Who never aimed a turret through the DUST of swarm fire, forges, and grenades Who never kissed their ads or tank goodnight after a long day of not dying and made scrambled eggs in the morning for it, Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. Bring These Back Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
Patrlck 56 460	Posted - 2014.08.24 04:36:00 - [2] - Quote Soulja Ghostface wrote: Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol
Soulja Ghostface 2633	Posted - 2014.08.24 04:47:00 - [3] - Quote Patrlck 56 wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Exactly, When dealing with tanks...Listen to the real tankers When dealing with ads...Listen to the real ads piilots When dealing with amarr logi... Listen to the real amarr logis When dealing with etc. ...Listen to the real etc. players Bring These Back Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
MrShooter01 Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 685	Posted - 2014.08.24 04:48:00 - [4] - Quote Patrlck 56 wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Yes op is absolutely right My missile tank should have a 10 meter splash radius and do 1000 splash damage per missile As an occasional tank driver I know whats best for you foot plebs. You input is not necessary or desired, and is wrong anyways. also swarms should not lock onto my vehicles because lockons take 0 skill and I totally would not be whining about them if they were dumbfire and killed me anyways like forges (which should also be nerfed) If you do not have 20m+ sp in vehicle skills your opinion is irrelevant and you deserve to be stomped by me
Atiim 11602	Posted - 2014.08.24 04:48:00 - [5] - Quote If Vehicle Pilots were the only ones who had influence over how vehicles are balanced, the vehicles would become insanely overpowered and AV weapons would become non-factors against them, due to a large amount of Pilots that feel as if AV weapons should be non-factors against them. Source: Uprising 1.7 - Hotfix Bravo DUST 514's 1st Matari Commando -HAND
Soulja Ghostface 2633	Posted - 2014.08.24 04:52:00 - [6] - Quote Atiim wrote: If Vehicle Pilots were the only ones who had influence over how vehicles are balanced, the vehicles would become insanely overpowered and AV weapons would become non-factors against them, due to a large amount of Pilots that feel as if AV weapons should be non-factors against them. Source: Uprising 1.7 - Hotfix Bravo A vehicle pilot or a fotm mlt sica bluedot? You might want to check your sources. Uprising 1.7 happened because ccp didn't listen to THE REAL VEHICLE PILOTS MrShooter01 wrote: My missile tank should have a 10 meter splash radius and do 1000 splash damage per missile Splash radius needs to be looked at but 1000 splash damage is a bit overkill Bring These Back Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
Atiim 11603	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:24:00 - [7] - Quote Soulja Ghostface wrote: Patrlck 56 wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Exactly, When dealing with tanks...Listen to the real tankers When dealing with ads...Listen to the real ads piilots When dealing with amarr logi... Listen to the real amarr logis When dealing with etc. ...Listen to the real etc. players I wholeheartedly agree. Now for my requests: Increase Swarm Launcher Lock range to 2000m (same range as the old Missile Installation AI). Increase Swarm Launcher Damage to 825/855/875HP per Missile. Increase Swarm Launcher Clip Size to 12 rounds (9 at the Militia tier). Increase Swarm Launcher Air Speed to 250m/s. Decrease Swarm Launcher Lock Time to 0.25s (.5s on Specialist Variants) We're only listening to the "real" Swarmers, so you have no say in this idea's implementation. Also. DUST 514's 1st Matari Commando -HAND
Bone Scratcher The dyst0pian Corporation 68	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:30:00 - [8] - Quote No. You're not only wrong, but painfully wrong. You need everyone's opinion. If this were the case, I would say the following: -Give the Amarr sentinel a 25 sprint speed -Give the HMG more DPS than a rail tank -Change the Amarr sentinel slot layout to 5/5 -Give the HMG more range than a Rail Rifle -Replace the Amarr sentinels' sidearm with a light weapon slot -Give the Amarr sentinel infinite grenades -Remove the skills to get into heavies from the game, so that only current heavies have fun. See what I mean? Proto FG/HMG Amarr Sentinel. Lag Compensation Explained Just hit 1y in my corp!
Crimson ShieId Psygod9 786	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:31:00 - [9] - Quote I'd love it if tanks were expensive and halfway difficult to use again. Might actually give me a reason to go back into tanking... though I'd want all the old modules back, first. No way I'd invest SP into the simplified crapfest that tanks have become since 1.7 was released. Nova Knives are best sidearm.
Soulja Ghostface 2634	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:32:00 - [10] - Quote Atiim wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: Patrlck 56 wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Exactly, When dealing with tanks...Listen to the real tankers When dealing with ads...Listen to the real ads piilots When dealing with amarr logi... Listen to the real amarr logis When dealing with etc. ...Listen to the real etc. players I wholeheartedly agree. Now for my requests: Increase Swarm Launcher Lock range to 2000m (same range as the old Missile Installation AI). Increase Swarm Launcher Damage to 825/855/875HP per Missile. Increase Swarm Launcher Clip Size to 12 rounds (9 at the Militia tier). Increase Swarm Launcher Air Speed to 250m/s. Decrease Swarm Launcher Lock Time to 0.25s (.5s on Specialist Variants) We're only listening to the "real" Swarmers, so you have no say in this idea's implementation. Also. If you can read, you will notice you do not fall in this criteria Bone Scratcher wrote: No. You're not only wrong, but painfully wrong. You need everyone's opinion. If this were the case, I would say the following: -Give the Amarr sentinel a 25 sprint speed. -Give the HMG more DPS than a rail tank. -Remove the skills to get into heavies from the game, so that only current heavies have fun. See what I mean? What comes to mind when you see the word "Real"? Bring These Back Tanker Turned Ads Pilot

aaaasdff ertgfdd 236	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:35:00 - [11] - Quote Soulja Ghostface wrote: 500k-700k in isk asset that shoot kisses and drive around the field to be instaganked by rifles. It really is pathetic how people with no turret game, Who don't even deserve to touch the steering wheel of a single dropship or tank, With no sp in vehicles, Never had their wallet kick them in the balls (If they had any), Never massacred dropsuits with a large rail, Never flew a dropship for more then 5 minutes without exploding, Who never saw the sexy red glow of a cannon turret, Who never aimed a turret through the DUST of swarm fire, forges, and grenades Who never kissed their ads or tank goodnight after a long day of not dying and made scrambled eggs in the morning for it, Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. Must disagree, vehicles are not just balanced by one side, AV and infantry must have some input. Tankers and dropship pilots must have infantry support to kill av now. Its that simple. That forger or swarmer on the roof must be taken out by your infantry support. You are still used to super tank 1.8 where you could IGNORE av, now they must be dealt with. It really comes down to that. You can no longer ignore AV...... INFINITE DIVERSITY IDIC/ Peaceful Pirate No Dagger Just Swagger/ Num1 AHole in Dust/ Politically Incorrect MAN
Bone Scratcher The dyst0pian Corporation 68	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:39:00 - [12] - Quote Soulja Ghostface wrote: Bone Scratcher wrote: No. You're not only wrong, but painfully wrong. You need everyone's opinion. If this were the case, I would say the following: -Give the Amarr sentinel a 25 sprint speed. -Give the HMG more DPS than a rail tank. -Remove the skills to get into heavies from the game, so that only current heavies have fun. See what I mean? What comes to mind when you see the word "Real"? Real. Are you suggesting that I am not a real Amarr sentinel user? I'm a proto Amarr sentinel. I have been a sentinel since mid 1.7, which is longer than all of these FOTM guys. Proto FG/HMG Amarr Sentinel. Lag Compensation Explained Just hit 1y in my corp!
hold that Krusual Covert Operators Minmatar Republic 204	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:40:00 - [13] - Quote Tanks are pretty legit right now. It's ADS that's ez mode
Soulja Ghostface 2635	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:41:00 - [14] - Quote aaaasdff ertgfdd wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: 500k-700k in isk asset that shoot kisses and drive around the field to be instaganked by rifles. It really is pathetic how people with no turret game, Who don't even deserve to touch the steering wheel of a single dropship or tank, With no sp in vehicles, Never had their wallet kick them in the balls (If they had any), Never massacred dropsuits with a large rail, Never flew a dropship for more then 5 minutes without exploding, Who never saw the sexy red glow of a cannon turret, Who never aimed a turret through the DUST of swarm fire, forges, and grenades Who never kissed their ads or tank goodnight after a long day of not dying and made scrambled eggs in the morning for it, Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. Must disagree, vehicles are not just balanced by one side, AV and infantry must have some input. Tankers and dropship pilots must have infantry support to kill av now. Its that simple. That forger or swarmer on the roof must be taken out by your infantry support. You are still used to super tank 1.8 where you could IGNORE av, now they must be dealt with. It really comes down to that. You can no longer ignore AV...... Vehicle wizards giving feedback about vehicles to ccp, AV wizards giving feedback about AV to ccp cpm and devs proccess feedback and create patch. Do you want a tanker telling ccp how much damage your swarm launcher should do? Or better yet somebody who only has mlt swarms? Bring These Back Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
Soulja Ghostface 2635	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:45:00 - [15] - Quote Bone Scratcher wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: Bone Scratcher wrote: No. You're not only wrong, but painfully wrong. You need everyone's opinion. If this were the case, I would say the following: -Give the Amarr sentinel a 25 sprint speed. -Give the HMG more DPS than a rail tank. -Remove the skills to get into heavies from the game, so that only current heavies have fun. See what I mean? What comes to mind when you see the word "Real"? Real. Are you suggesting that I am not a real Amarr sentinel user? I'm a proto Amarr sentinel. I have been a sentinel since mid 1.7, which is longer than all of these FOTM guys. important and deserving to be regarded or treated in a serious way- Merriam Websters third definition of real We can all agree real people give real feedback? Quote: -Give the Amarr sentinel a 25 sprint speed. -Give the HMG more DPS than a rail tank. -Remove the skills to get into heavies from the game, so that only current heavies have fun. Is this real feedback? Bring These Back Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
Derrith Erador Fatal Absolution 2487	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:46:00 - [16] - Quote aaaasdff ertgfdd wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: 500k-700k in isk asset that shoot kisses and drive around the field to be instaganked by rifles. It really is pathetic how people with no turret game, Who don't even deserve to touch the steering wheel of a single dropship or tank, With no sp in vehicles, Never had their wallet kick them in the balls (If they had any), Never massacred dropsuits with a large rail, Never flew a dropship for more then 5 minutes without exploding, Who never saw the sexy red glow of a cannon turret, Who never aimed a turret through the DUST of swarm fire, forges, and grenades Who never kissed their ads or tank goodnight after a long day of not dying and made scrambled eggs in the morning for it, Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. Must disagree, vehicles are not just balanced by one side, AV and infantry must have some input. Tankers and dropship pilots must have infantry support to kill av now. Its that simple. That forger or swarmer on the roof must be taken out by your infantry support. You are still used to super tank 1.8 where you could IGNORE av, now they must be dealt with. It really comes down to that. You can no longer ignore AV...... Ignoring AV is the fastest way a pilot dies. Any vehicle that doesn't fight AV is an ignorant pilot. And suppose that forger is garbage, or that swarm is militia, we'd go back to the pre 1.7 days (not that 1.7 was even remotely fair). Add to the fact that most people in GD fail to take personal skill into account. If the ADS fighting a forger is garbage, with a stupid fit, and the forge is good, he's going to die, end of story. It's the one thing that makes me hate arguing with GD people, I've yet to see them take personal skill into account, it's always "he shouldn't do this" "broken hitboxes that". Maybe some people are just good in what they do, hey that might be a thought. I am the skybound warrior, you will know to run when you hear the music from above that make panties disappear.
Lloyd Orfay Commando Perkone Caldari State 44	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:48:00 - [17] - Quote Soulja Ghostface wrote: 500k-700k in isk asset that shoot kisses and drive around the field to be instaganked by rifles. It really is pathetic how infantry that work hard Who don't need to touch the steering wheel of a single dropship or tank, With no sp in things they don't need that have their wallet kick them in the balls Never survived against any vehicle Never flew a dropship for more then 5 minutes without saying "This is boring/ too easy" Who always saw the flash of a cannon tank before getting ganked hard Who struggled to aim a turret through the DUST of eing bombared by a missile ADS Who never kissed their ads or tank goodnight after a long day of being nearly invincible in their bitchfit and made scrambled eggs in the morning for it, Have barely an influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. I agree with you. But jokes aside I don't. Vehicles don't really belong in dust, as it has attempted to go in the direction of being team based while users of vehicles rarely have teambased motives, or need to rely as much on them. All they are is annoying, some combatable and some that barely is. All they do is get kills in one way of another, making another way of getting many kills in a form of high reward low risk gameplay. "Dropships" need to rely on a team to get things done, but their purpose leans far too much on being an offensive unit. Assault "dropships" do not need to rely on a team, do not benefit from a team, hardly help a team, and have a highly excessive reward. Assault "dropships" are nearly invincible. either through evasive maneuvers, shields that can survive forge ganking quite easily, or both. It may take skill to fly a dropship, but this does not make up for the fact that an ADS player can basically wipe out entire teams if they wanted. Not many things can kill them besides a very strong railtank and forgers, in which super railtanks are rare and they know when a forgeteam is there and can nearly always run away. Putting tanks in this game is unnecessary, as there are not many things that need such offensive power besides destroying installations, "dropships" or LAVs or other tanks. LAVs are pretty solid, but their offensive capability is slim since the one manning the gun is way too exposed. Sometimes their existence is for very ill purpose. A sentinel is suppost to have the permanent drawback of being slow, and yet can make up for this by shooting down anyone they please in their highly mobile LAV. It's also tactically displeasing to have one person in a LAV use scanners to give away the location of an entire team to a set amount of people. The reason people have an influence on vehicles is because they are the majority. If a minority like vehicles is negatively affecting too many players(The majority) something will be done about it, and it is exactly affecting the majority negatively. I play my games hardcore with teamwork until roughly phallic shaped aircrafts ruin the game in more than one aspect.
Bone Scratcher The dyst0pian Corporation 68	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:49:00 - [18] - Quote Soulja Ghostface wrote: Bone Scratcher wrote: -Give the Amarr sentinel a 25 sprint speed. -Give the HMG more DPS than a rail tank. -Remove the skills to get into heavies from the game, so that only current heavies have fun. Is this real feedback? If you are really asking whether this is real feedback or not, your judgement/common sense is even lower than I had previously believed. Proto FG/HMG Amarr Sentinel. Lag Compensation Explained Just hit 1y in my corp!
Soulja Ghostface 2635	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:50:00 - [19] - Quote Bone Scratcher wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: Bone Scratcher wrote: -Give the Amarr sentinel a 25 sprint speed. -Give the HMG more DPS than a rail tank. -Remove the skills to get into heavies from the game, so that only current heavies have fun. Is this real feedback? If you are really asking whether this is real feedback or not, your judgement/common sense is even lower than I had previously believed. Rhetorical Question If you didn't notice that then your judgement/common sense is even lower than I had previously believed. Bring These Back Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
Bone Scratcher The dyst0pian Corporation 68	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:52:00 - [20] - Quote Soulja Ghostface wrote: Bone Scratcher wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: Bone Scratcher wrote: -Give the Amarr sentinel a 25 sprint speed. -Give the HMG more DPS than a rail tank. -Remove the skills to get into heavies from the game, so that only current heavies have fun. Is this real feedback? If you are really asking whether this is real feedback or not, your judgement/common sense is even lower than I had previously believed. Rhetorical Question If you didn't notice that then your judgement/common sense is even lower than I had previously believed. You act like I can sense sarcasm over the internet, which, (again,) leads me to doubt your general common sense. Also, here. Proto FG/HMG Amarr Sentinel. Lag Compensation Explained Just hit 1y in my corp!

Hakyou Brutor Pure Evil. 1124	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:54:00 - [21] - Quote Soulja Ghostface wrote: ...Listen to the real tankers... You wouldn't happen to be referring to yourself? lol...
Thurak1 Psygod9 940	Posted - 2014.08.24 05:59:00 - [22] - Quote Soulja Ghostface wrote: Patrlck 56 wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Exactly, When dealing with tanks...Listen to the real tankers When dealing with ads...Listen to the real ads piilots When dealing with amarr logi... Listen to the real amarr logis When dealing with etc. ...Listen to the real etc. players So when dealing with AV only listen to av players? Sounds great to me. I am totally ready to have my forge gun have a bonus vs vehicles :) I think it should also have at least a semi homing projectile that is like a magnet. The more metal on the vehicle the more it homes :)
Soulja Ghostface 2637	Posted - 2014.08.24 06:04:00 - [23] - Quote Lloyd Orfay wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: 500k-700k in isk asset that shoot kisses and drive around the field to be instaganked by rifles. It really is pathetic how infantry that work hard Who don't need to touch the steering wheel of a single dropship or tank, With no sp in things they don't need that have their wallet kick them in the balls Never survived against any vehicle Never flew a dropship for more then 5 minutes without saying "This is boring/ too easy" Who always saw the flash of a cannon tank before getting ganked hard Who struggled to aim a turret through the DUST of eing bombared by a missile ADS Who never kissed their ads or tank goodnight after a long day of being nearly invincible in their bitchfit and made scrambled eggs in the morning for it, Have barely an influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. I agree with you. But jokes aside I don't. Vehicles don't really belong in dust Another infantry player who just wants shoot faces and blap tanks with assualt rifles? Bring These Back Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
Soulja Ghostface 2637	Posted - 2014.08.24 06:05:00 - [24] - Quote Thurak1 wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: Patrlck 56 wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Exactly, When dealing with tanks...Listen to the real tankers When dealing with ads...Listen to the real ads piilots When dealing with amarr logi... Listen to the real amarr logis When dealing with etc. ...Listen to the real etc. players So when dealing with AV only listen to av players? Sounds great to me. I am totally ready to have my forge gun have a bonus vs vehicles :) I think it should also have at least a semi homing projectile that is like a magnet. The more metal on the vehicle the more it homes :) Failed Troll Is Failed Also Goodluck getting that past the cpm and community managers Bring These Back Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
Bone Scratcher The dyst0pian Corporation 68	Posted - 2014.08.24 06:09:00 - [25] - Quote Funny how you just dodged this: Hakyou Brutor wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: ...Listen to the real tankers... You wouldn't happen to be referring to yourself? lol... And this: Bone Scratcher wrote: You act like I can sense sarcasm over the internet, which, (again,) leads me to doubt your general common sense. Also, here. Proto FG/HMG Amarr Sentinel. Lag Compensation Explained Just hit 1y in my corp!
Soulja Ghostface 2637	Posted - 2014.08.24 06:14:00 - [26] - Quote Bone Scratcher wrote: Funny how you just dodged this: Hakyou Brutor wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: ...Listen to the real tankers... You wouldn't happen to be referring to yourself? lol... And this: Bone Scratcher wrote: You act like I can sense sarcasm over the internet, which, (again,) leads me to doubt your general common sense. Also, here. Didn't feel like typing it but Notice those question marks? Your forum pvp needs more sp invested to it Bring These Back Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
Bone Scratcher The dyst0pian Corporation 68	Posted - 2014.08.24 06:16:00 - [27] - Quote Soulja Ghostface wrote: Bone Scratcher wrote: Funny how you just dodged this: Hakyou Brutor wrote: Soulja Ghostface wrote: ...Listen to the real tankers... You wouldn't happen to be referring to yourself? lol... And this: Bone Scratcher wrote: You act like I can sense sarcasm over the internet, which, (again,) leads me to doubt your general common sense. Also, here. Didn't feel like typing it but Notice those question marks? Your forum pvp needs more sp invested to it ...What? You, "didn't feel like typing it?" So basically, you are saying I was wrong because I didn't notice your imaginary question marks? Oh boy. Proto FG/HMG Amarr Sentinel. Lag Compensation Explained Just hit 1y in my corp!
Soulja Ghostface 2637	Posted - 2014.08.24 06:22:00 - [28] - Quote Didnt feel like answering but if you hold it over my head. Boom I answered it. Also if you reread some post you can see I usead a LOT of question marks. Bring These Back Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
Bone Scratcher The dyst0pian Corporation 68	Posted - 2014.08.24 06:23:00 - [29] - Quote Also, the link you provided showed a flipped over question mark. You used zero of them. Good game. Proto FG/HMG Amarr Sentinel. Lag Compensation Explained Just hit 1y in my corp!
Thumb Green Raymond James Corp 1291	Posted - 2014.08.24 06:51:00 - [30] - Quote Soulja Ghostface wrote: Atiim wrote: I wholeheartedly agree. Now for my requests: Increase Swarm Launcher Lock range to 2000m (same range as the old Missile Installation AI). Increase Swarm Launcher Damage to 825/855/875HP per Missile. Increase Swarm Launcher Clip Size to 12 rounds (9 at the Militia tier). Increase Swarm Launcher Air Speed to 250m/s. Decrease Swarm Launcher Lock Time to 0.25s (.5s on Specialist Variants) We're only listening to the "real" Swarmers, so you have no say in this idea's implementation. Also. If you can read, you will notice you do not fall in this criteria Bone Scratcher wrote: No. You're not only wrong, but painfully wrong. You need everyone's opinion. If this were the case, I would say the following: -Give the Amarr sentinel a 25 sprint speed. -Give the HMG more DPS than a rail tank. -Remove the skills to get into heavies from the game, so that only current heavies have fun. See what I mean? What comes to mind when you see the word "Real"? Within the context of how you are using it, filthy hipster comes to mind. At the RJC we don't kick ass, we kick dick and we kick it hard. Kill Scotty



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page