Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Soulja Ghostface
2642
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:34:00 -
[61] - Quote
Bone Scratcher wrote:I'll join in, too! Proto missile launcher! I haven't touched my tanks since before 1.7, when they weren't super OP.
(It's no fun when you are OP!)
I do, however, have 3 mil sunk into turrets, 4.5 mil sunk into vehicle upgrades, and one mil into vehicle operation, (which does nothing for tanks, really.) Your in luck, The servers are currently not availiable
EDIT: If that's all the sp you have in vehicles you need to step your game up
Bring These Back
Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
|
Hakyou Brutor
Pure Evil.
1131
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:37:00 -
[62] - Quote
Soulja Ghostface wrote:Hakyou Brutor wrote:If I wanted to die I'd name my character Soulja and accept a 1v1 from my self.
Because I'm going to win. You have convinced me you have never faced a particle cannon before. I've been in more PCs than you have pubs. I've 3 v 1 tankers from top corps and drove away with my turret smoking. |
RYN0CER0S
Rise Of Old Dudes
1312
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:37:00 -
[63] - Quote
I only roll Infantry, but I had a great, sensible suggestion to help buff your precious little tin can. Too bad my opinion doesn't matter.
I don't always blap Infantry with a Forge Gun, but when I do, that ** is hilarious.
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
4445
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:38:00 -
[64] - Quote
Patrlck 56 wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol
Uprising 1.7
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Hakyou Brutor
Pure Evil.
1132
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:45:00 -
[65] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Patrlck 56 wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Uprising 1.7 I totally agree 1.7 was one of the least fun times for tanking, while 1.5 was one of the best, despite the fact that tanks got 3-hit by swarms or forges.
See, because there was actual variation, and actually good fight. |
Soulja Ghostface
2642
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:45:00 -
[66] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Patrlck 56 wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Uprising 1.7 Tankers only asked for AV to be balanced against us, mlt tankers wanted tanks buffed, CCP listened and created 1.7
Bring These Back
Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
|
DozersMouse XIII
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
875
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:45:00 -
[67] - Quote
Soulja Ghostface wrote:500k-700k in isk asset that shoot kisses and drive around the field to be instaganked by rifles.
It really is pathetic how people with no turret game, Who don't even deserve to touch the steering wheel of a single dropship or tank, With no sp in vehicles, Never had their wallet kick them in the balls (If they had any), Never massacred dropsuits with a large rail, Never flew a dropship for more then 5 minutes without exploding, Who never saw the sexy red glow of a cannon turret, Who never aimed a turret through the DUST of swarm fire, forges, and grenades Who never kissed their ads or tank goodnight after a long day of not dying and made scrambled eggs in the morning for it, Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. I like tanks where they're at now
the problem I have with these weenie pilots is them being able to hop out with their burst hmg while i'm trying to use AV
M.A.G. Platinum trophy holder
|
Soulja Ghostface
2642
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:47:00 -
[68] - Quote
Hakyou Brutor wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Hakyou Brutor wrote:If I wanted to die I'd name my character Soulja and accept a 1v1 from my self.
Because I'm going to win. You have convinced me you have never faced a particle cannon before. I've been in more PCs than you have pubs. I've 3 v 1 tankers from top corps and drove away with my turret smoking. I had 1v6 tanks in a dom and ended the battle without my shields ever dropping
Save e-peen stroking for the war room plz
Bring These Back
Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
|
Soulja Ghostface
2642
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:50:00 -
[69] - Quote
DozersMouse XIII wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:500k-700k in isk asset that shoot kisses and drive around the field to be instaganked by rifles.
It really is pathetic how people with no turret game, Who don't even deserve to touch the steering wheel of a single dropship or tank, With no sp in vehicles, Never had their wallet kick them in the balls (If they had any), Never massacred dropsuits with a large rail, Never flew a dropship for more then 5 minutes without exploding, Who never saw the sexy red glow of a cannon turret, Who never aimed a turret through the DUST of swarm fire, forges, and grenades Who never kissed their ads or tank goodnight after a long day of not dying and made scrambled eggs in the morning for it, Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. I like tanks where they're at now the problem I have with these weenie pilots is them being able to hop out with their burst hmg while i'm trying to use AV That is what is supposed to happen, Tanks are merely an extension of the player, When the player used that to benefit the team he becomes what the community calls a force multiplier.
Bring These Back
Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
4445
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:50:00 -
[70] - Quote
Hakyou Brutor wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Patrlck 56 wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Uprising 1.7 I totally agree 1.7 was one of the least fun times for tanking, while 1.5 was one of the best, despite the fact that tanks got 3-hit by swarms or forges. See, because there was actual variation, and actually good fight.
3 pilots 4 pilots in this game appreciate the challenge of a good fight.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
|
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
254
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:54:00 -
[71] - Quote
Soulja Ghostface wrote:Hakyou Brutor wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Hakyou Brutor wrote:If I wanted to die I'd name my character Soulja and accept a 1v1 from my self.
Because I'm going to win. You have convinced me you have never faced a particle cannon before. I've been in more PCs than you have pubs. I've 3 v 1 tankers from top corps and drove away with my turret smoking. I had 1v6 tanks in a dom and ended the battle without my shields ever dropping Save e-peen stroking for the war room plz
keep dreaming, and 1v1 6 different times don't mean **** |
Hakyou Brutor
Pure Evil.
1133
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:55:00 -
[72] - Quote
Soulja Ghostface wrote:Hakyou Brutor wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Hakyou Brutor wrote:If I wanted to die I'd name my character Soulja and accept a 1v1 from my self.
Because I'm going to win. You have convinced me you have never faced a particle cannon before. I've been in more PCs than you have pubs. I've 3 v 1 tankers from top corps and drove away with my turret smoking. I had 1v6 tanks in a dom and ended the battle without my shields ever dropping Save e-peen stroking for the war room plz 1 v 6 militia tanks is soo easy, I thought I wouldn't even mention the 1 v 16 I had in pubs, pubs are laughable, just like your mom's face. |
Soulja Ghostface
2642
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 17:58:00 -
[73] - Quote
Hakyou Brutor wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Hakyou Brutor wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Hakyou Brutor wrote:If I wanted to die I'd name my character Soulja and accept a 1v1 from my self.
Because I'm going to win. You have convinced me you have never faced a particle cannon before. I've been in more PCs than you have pubs. I've 3 v 1 tankers from top corps and drove away with my turret smoking. I had 1v6 tanks in a dom and ended the battle without my shields ever dropping Save e-peen stroking for the war room plz 1 v 6 militia tanks is soo easy, I thought I wouldn't even mention the 1 v 16 I had in pubs, pubs are laughable, just like your mom's face. The fact that you must resort to rage shots over feats to compensate for your lack of forum pvp is laughable
Just like your life
^^(Coudn't resist)
Bring These Back
Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
|
Hakyou Brutor
Pure Evil.
1133
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:05:00 -
[74] - Quote
Soulja Ghostface wrote:The fact that you must resort to rage shots over feats to compensate for your lack of forum pvp is laughable Just like your life ^^(Coudn't resist) EDIT: 1 v 16 has never happened due to blue(red)dots inability to think tactically outside of the motherships range There's actually many reasons a 1 vs 16 is impossible!
I'm honestly not sure if you're legitimately stupid or a fantastic troll. |
Soulja Ghostface
2642
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:16:00 -
[75] - Quote
I'm done here, Nothing but derailed convos. (c me in-game for that nonsense)
Quote:inability to think tactically outside of the motherships range Yes the team quota and all that other stuff prevents 1 v 16. I however wanted to throw a jab at the berries.
Bring These Back
Tanker Turned Ads Pilot
|
DontChimpOut
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:23:00 -
[76] - Quote
Patrlck 56 wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol No, CCP doesn't listen to them at all when making vehicle changes.
We can add new LP items, but we need to see FW participation numbers go up to make it worth our time. - CCP Dev
|
Atiim
11618
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:24:00 -
[77] - Quote
DontChimpOut wrote:Patrlck 56 wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol No, CCP doesn't listen to them at all when making vehicle changes. Then explain Uprising 1.7.
DUST 514's 1st Matari Commando
-HAND
|
DontChimpOut
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:31:00 -
[78] - Quote
Atiim wrote:If Vehicle Pilots were the only ones who had influence over how vehicles are balanced, the vehicles would become insanely overpowered and AV weapons would become non-factors against them, due to a large amount of Pilots that feel as if AV weapons should be non-factors against them.
Source: Uprising 1.7 - Hotfix Bravo It's already obvious that pilots have 0 influence over how their vehicles get changed.
We can add new LP items, but we need to see FW participation numbers go up to make it worth our time. - CCP Dev
|
DontChimpOut
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:32:00 -
[79] - Quote
Soulja Ghostface wrote: What comes to mind when you see the word "Real"?
Real Madrid
We can add new LP items, but we need to see FW participation numbers go up to make it worth our time. - CCP Dev
|
DontChimpOut
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:33:00 -
[80] - Quote
hold that wrote:Tanks are pretty legit right now. It's ADS that's ez mode You're just saying that because the ADS hasn't been nerfed into uselessness like tanks have.
We can add new LP items, but we need to see FW participation numbers go up to make it worth our time. - CCP Dev
|
|
DontChimpOut
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:38:00 -
[81] - Quote
Lloyd Orfay wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:500k-700k in isk asset that shoot kisses and drive around the field to be instaganked by rifles.
It really is pathetic how infantry that work hard Who don't need to touch the steering wheel of a single dropship or tank, With no sp in things they don't need that have their wallet kick them in the balls Never survived against any vehicle Never flew a dropship for more then 5 minutes without saying "This is boring/ too easy" Who always saw the flash of a cannon tank before getting ganked hard Who struggled to aim a turret through the DUST of eing bombared by a missile ADS Who never kissed their ads or tank goodnight after a long day of being nearly invincible in their bitchfit and made scrambled eggs in the morning for it, Have barely an influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. I agree with you. But jokes aside I don't. Vehicles don't really belong in dust, as it has attempted to go in the direction of being team based while users of vehicles rarely have teambased motives, or need to rely as much on them. All they are is annoying, some combatable and some that barely is. All they do is get kills in one way of another, making another way of getting many kills in a form of high reward low risk gameplay. "Dropships" need to rely on a team to get things done, but their purpose leans far too much on being an offensive unit. Assault "dropships" do not need to rely on a team, do not benefit from a team, hardly help a team, and have a highly excessive reward. Assault "dropships" are nearly invincible. either through evasive maneuvers, shields that can survive forge ganking quite easily, or both. It may take skill to fly a dropship, but this does not make up for the fact that an ADS player can basically wipe out entire teams if they wanted. Not many things can kill them besides a very strong railtank and forgers, in which super railtanks are rare and they know when a forgeteam is there and can nearly always run away. Putting tanks in this game is unnecessary, as there are not many things that need such offensive power besides destroying installations, "dropships" or LAVs or other tanks. LAVs are pretty solid, but their offensive capability is slim since the one manning the gun is way too exposed. Sometimes their existence is for very ill purpose. A sentinel is suppost to have the permanent drawback of being slow, and yet can make up for this by shooting down anyone they please in their highly mobile LAV. It's also tactically displeasing to have one person in a LAV use scanners to give away the location of an entire team to a set amount of people. The reason people have an influence on vehicles is because they are the majority. If a minority like vehicles is negatively affecting too many players(The majority) something will be done about it, and it is exactly affecting the majority negatively. Lots of complaining you're doing, and nothing of the sort of PTFO and explaining how to counter vehicles.
I've seen pilots say many, many times how to counter them, yet nobody listens. They'd rather complain to CCP and have vehicles nerfed.
We can add new LP items, but we need to see FW participation numbers go up to make it worth our time. - CCP Dev
|
DontChimpOut
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:39:00 -
[82] - Quote
Thurak1 wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Patrlck 56 wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Exactly, When dealing with tanks...Listen to the real tankers When dealing with ads...Listen to the real ads piilots When dealing with amarr logi... Listen to the real amarr logis When dealing with etc. ...Listen to the real etc. players So when dealing with AV only listen to av players? Sounds great to me. I am totally ready to have my forge gun have a bonus vs vehicles :) I think it should also have at least a semi homing projectile that is like a magnet. The more metal on the vehicle the more it homes :) Use swarms if you're that bad at aiming.
We can add new LP items, but we need to see FW participation numbers go up to make it worth our time. - CCP Dev
|
DontChimpOut
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:48:00 -
[83] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:What most people are reffering to here in response to your statement is a 'slippery slope'. You afterall here to win a game, so sure you may give a few mild buffs that might be needed (personally I think a fitting power buff is with reasonable limits).
But tankers will, slowly but surely, suggest increasingly powerful buffs and after a period of time the buffs stack up and you suddenly have tanks rolling round with 10,000 and 50% passive damage resistance to AV weaponry.
I guess the Tac AR was fine all along. So was the Caldari logi suit. And the flaylock. Seeing 90% Tac AR in a single match? They're just testing it, they weren't overpowered or anything.
In order to achieve balance, the opinion of more than he who pulls the trigger is required. Every person be they victim or perpetrator has a right ot give their opinion and back it up with reasonable evidence.
If CCP ever paid attention to vehicle users, they wouldn't've been made useless more than once. Listening to the section of people that don't use something to change that thing they don't use is not right. That would be like CCP taking pilots' opinions on dropsuit HP modules, and only their opinions. You really think tankers would let armor plates have decent HP gains?
You'll never hear a RR user admit he has too much damage for his range You'll never hear an ScR user admit his ROF is too high You'll never hear a BCR user admit his damage profile is unbalanced
Your attitude however from your OP, also goes to show why shouldn't listen just to tankers, your attitude towards non-pilot players is worse tha Spkr and Taki. If you wish to truly balance your playstyle you need input from the playstyles that are both countered by it amd counter to it.
Maybe if CCP listened to those 2 guys, who seemed to be tanks biggest defenders, then tankers as a whole wouldn't be in such a sinkhole.
We can add new LP items, but we need to see FW participation numbers go up to make it worth our time. - CCP Dev
|
DontChimpOut
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:51:00 -
[84] - Quote
Soulja Ghostface wrote:Derpty Derp wrote:derping Is this too complex for you to understand? It certainly seems like it is, constantly asking is an exercise in futility.
We can add new LP items, but we need to see FW participation numbers go up to make it worth our time. - CCP Dev
|
DontChimpOut
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:53:00 -
[85] - Quote
MarasdF Loron wrote: Maybe buff, like 100% more dmg to all AV weaponry. I'm being serious, most AV players don't know what the hell they are doing so they need this aid. And then those who are already good at AV wouldn't be any more of a threat because they can already do their job just fine. That's like buying a Lamborghini as a 16 year old's first car. Just because it's a car doesn't mean they can handle it.
If people don't know what they're doing with AV, why should it get buffed to make up for their stupidity, which can be fixed given time and experience?
We can add new LP items, but we need to see FW participation numbers go up to make it worth our time. - CCP Dev
|
DontChimpOut
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:55:00 -
[86] - Quote
Atiim wrote: I've read your posts within this thread, and your logic is that only users of an Item should be allowed to determine how said item is balanced, so with me being a dedicated SL user, I do meet this criteria.
Saying otherwise is a double-standard.
If you had it your way, swarms could lock on to and destroy EVE ships in FW and PC.
We can add new LP items, but we need to see FW participation numbers go up to make it worth our time. - CCP Dev
|
DontChimpOut
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:57:00 -
[87] - Quote
843-Vika wrote:MrShooter01 wrote:Patrlck 56 wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Yes op is absolutely right My missile tank should have a 10 meter splash radius and do 1000 splash damage per missile As an occasional tank driver I know whats best for you foot plebs. You input is not necessary or desired, and is wrong anyways. also swarms should not lock onto my vehicles because lockons take 0 skill and I totally would not be whining about them if they were dumbfire and killed me anyways like forges (which should also be nerfed) If you do not have 20m+ sp in vehicle skills your opinion is irrelevant and you deserve to be stomped by me And you Sir Scrub should stop crying for the only things that can kill a tank to be nerfed, as if just because youhave a tank yur not supposed to be killed. Scrubs STFU OR GTFO Last I remember, vehicles can destroy other vehicles, too. Why should AV be the only counter to vehicles in the game, and be powerful enough to destroy a star?
We can add new LP items, but we need to see FW participation numbers go up to make it worth our time. - CCP Dev
|
843-Vika
BurgezzE.T.F General Tso's Alliance
254
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:58:00 -
[88] - Quote
Soulja Ghostface wrote:Patrlck 56 wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Have more than 0% of influence in what the devs do with any vehicular changes. so only tankers should be listened to when CCP is making tank changes? lol Exactly, When dealing with tanks...Listen to the real tankers When dealing with ads...Listen to the real ads piilots When dealing with amarr logi... Listen to the real amarr logis When dealing with etc. ...Listen to the real etc. players
And if tankers had there way they would become completely unable to be destroyed and AV weapons would not exist. How ******** are you really? Were you the window licker on the short bus?
When CCP listened to tankers we had crap for AV and tank that couldn't be destroyed by AV weapons. You Sir Scrub need to use your brain for more then a cushion to sit on. |
DontChimpOut
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 18:59:00 -
[89] - Quote
Hakyou Brutor wrote:Soulja 1v1 me I'll slay you out in front of your mom who I'm sure lives upstairs (get it? cause you live in your mom's basement)
Tank vs Tank, you can use whatever you want. SPOILER: I'm going to win. Look out, CoD hotshot we have over here.
We can add new LP items, but we need to see FW participation numbers go up to make it worth our time. - CCP Dev
|
DontChimpOut
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2014.08.24 19:04:00 -
[90] - Quote
Hakyou Brutor wrote:Soulja Ghostface wrote:Hakyou Brutor wrote:If I wanted to die I'd name my character Soulja and accept a 1v1 from my self.
Because I'm going to win. You have convinced me you have never faced a particle cannon before. I've been in more PCs than you have pubs. I've 3 v 1 tankers from top corps and drove away with my turret smoking. 3 v 1? Top corps? lol okay
I've watched tankers that seemed like they had direct neural links into the game, as if it's Sword Art Online. They strike everything down with the wrath of an angry god.
We can add new LP items, but we need to see FW participation numbers go up to make it worth our time. - CCP Dev
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |