Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Denn Maell
PIanet Express Canis Eliminatus Operatives
264
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 03:02:00 -
[61] - Quote
Hansei Kaizen wrote:Has anyone mentioned the Burst AR and Breach AR, are they as absolutely horrible as I've experienced, or is it just me? Why does only the Creodron drop as loot? WHYYYYY?!
Had 20 something burst and breach advanced still in stock since I started out last year. Put them on my commando and burned through them with a KDR of 0.2 ... (my standard KDR atm is about 3 with any other fuckin weapon tm).
What is the purpose of the breach weapons in general? I find them all crappy as ****.
The Burst AR is good if your dealing with shield users. I it also has much better range than the base AR. BreachGǪI'm tempted to say you'll notice more difference from damage mods due to the Breach's higher per-damage shot. But the Tactical is very good for quick and dirty marksmanship.
The most OP weapon on the Dust Battle Field:
One good logi, one rep tool, and a heavy.
|
Henchmen21
Planet Express LLC
841
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 03:13:00 -
[62] - Quote
Every one of my Gal commando's starts with an AR. For the event I am using standard suits and and exile rifle and doing just fine with it. I have more SP into CR's but if I need range I'll use my RR with literately one level and no other SP (Balanced right?) or my LR.
CCP you better nail 1.8, as it stands 1.7 is a total disaster.
Henchmen21: Infantry
Gotyougood Ufkr: Vehicles
|
Rusty Shallows
1378
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 03:17:00 -
[63] - Quote
I-Shayz-I wrote:I sometimes think that I was the only one to never skill into the AR after uprising. I mean I did so I could test some things with it, but never to actually use it. Same. I had SP with them in Chrome. Stayed focused on other weapons in Uprising. Last year my Minja used Militia ARs during a time of personal weakness. With Frame Bonuses now in effect CCP would have to directly force me to spend SP on them.
Forums > Game: So here is a cookie and a Like. Please keep posting.
Bwahahahahahahahahahaha! >>> GòÜ(GÇóGîéGÇó)Gò¥ >>>
|
Seigfried Warheit
Caught Me With My Pants Down
287
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 03:17:00 -
[64] - Quote
ARs are able to destroy me like nothing it just devours my shields then eats my lil armor without much problems...well I don't brick tank out the ass...maybe I should start |
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
875
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 07:41:00 -
[65] - Quote
Alpha 443-6732 wrote:iirc, new rail rifle has lower dps (~350) than AR with a spool up time of .30
scrambler rifle has overheat and is semi auto
AR is **** easy to use, high magazine, ZERO recoil for the first few seconds of firing down sight and good damage to back it up
Now the combat rifle on the other hand, has an amazing damage profile, solid range, amazing dps to go with the profile and the only downside I can see is low damage per bullet (which translates to more ammo consumed and less damage per magazine). I think that the CR is the problem here.
The RR still can be easily precharged so that does not really work as a balancing mechanic. Comparing the SCR to AR is and always was kinda stupid as both weapons serve a different purpose. Compare the SCR to Tac and come back telling everyone that the SCR is fine.
Also the ASCR has very little overheat (based on the SDE less that the AR) so this is invalid for the ASCR as it is still way more powerful in nearly every aspect of the gun.
So yes the CR IS a problem but not the only one. |
Krixus Flux
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
132
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 08:38:00 -
[66] - Quote
Oh look, its a cat merc thread that talks about the post problems of a weapon he so adamantly called for a nerf
Saying what's on people's minds
|
Stupid Blueberry
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
109
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 08:41:00 -
[67] - Quote
1pawn dust wrote:Funkmaster Whale wrote:I still love the AR but the problem is it isn't feasible for killing heavies. I can CR a tanked heavy down in one clip cause of the superior damage profile. Can't do that with the AR anymore.
If Gallente Assaulta had a 10% RoF bonus to ARs, I'd be all over that ****. 25% dispersion is so laughably useless on a gun that's already dead accurate. AR gets a sharp shooter skill for dispersion but alcholic withdraw symptoms RR doesnt wtf. CR gets bonus too, nerf both CR and AR!
That's because there is no dispersion on the rail rifle, the shot goes where the reticle is %100 of the time. |
Stupid Blueberry
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
109
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 08:46:00 -
[68] - Quote
Hansei Kaizen wrote:Has anyone mentioned the Burst AR and Breach AR, are they as absolutely horrible as I've experienced, or is it just me? Why does only the Creodron drop as loot? WHYYYYY?!
Had 20 something burst and breach advanced still in stock since I started out last year. Put them on my commando and burned through them with a KDR of 0.2 ... (my standard KDR atm is about 3 with any other fuckin weapon tm).
What is the purpose of the breach weapons in general? I find them all crappy as ****.
TAC was a placeholder for the Scrambler Rifle
Breach was placeholder for the Rail Rifle
Burst was placeholder for the Combat Rifle
They're laughable because it wouldn't be fair to skill into Gallente AR and have 4 variants that worked just as well as the racial counterparts they were mimicing. |
m twiggz
Pradox One Proficiency V.
443
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 08:46:00 -
[69] - Quote
Funkmaster Whale wrote:I still love the AR but the problem is it isn't feasible for killing heavies. I can CR a tanked heavy down in one clip cause of the superior damage profile. Can't do that with the AR anymore.
If Gallente Assaulta had a 10% RoF bonus to ARs, I'd be all over that ****. 25% dispersion is so laughably useless on a gun that's already dead accurate. This. |
Stupid Blueberry
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
109
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 08:49:00 -
[70] - Quote
Sergeant Sazu wrote:Well I think the Assault Rifle's advantage over the others is... it's extreme ease of use. Disregard it's effectiveness, and remember that it's very easy to land hits. Well, I've been using Assault Rifles all the time since Dust came out, so maybe it's just me.
But think about it. Almost all the rifles have something little about them that make them a little harder to use. Although insgnificant, they make mistakes more likely. And by "use" I simply mean landing hits at intended range, not how good the weapon is. Rail Rifle: Unstable, spool time Combat Rifle: Burst fire can be hard for some, especially with lag Laser Rifle: You have to be extremely precise Scrambler Rifle: Managing heat, knowing exactly when to realease a charge
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the Assault Combat Rifle and Assault Rifle are the only rifles that don't have some kind of tiny downside.
Ironsight on the ACR is inaccurate, it's a bit lower than it should be. Put a dot in the center of your TV and you'll see what I mean. |
|
Nosid Katona
HavoK Core RISE of LEGION
150
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 09:03:00 -
[71] - Quote
Stupid Blueberry wrote:Hansei Kaizen wrote:Has anyone mentioned the Burst AR and Breach AR, are they as absolutely horrible as I've experienced, or is it just me? Why does only the Creodron drop as loot? WHYYYYY?!
Had 20 something burst and breach advanced still in stock since I started out last year. Put them on my commando and burned through them with a KDR of 0.2 ... (my standard KDR atm is about 3 with any other fuckin weapon tm).
What is the purpose of the breach weapons in general? I find them all crappy as ****. TAC was a placeholder for the Scrambler Rifle Breach was placeholder for the Rail Rifle Burst was placeholder for the Combat Rifle They're laughable because it wouldn't be fair to skill into Gallente AR and have 4 variants that worked just as well as the racial counterparts they were mimicing.
I love when people bring this up, It is so easy to demolish this argument.
Placeholders they may have been, and I won't argue that they would need a downside so they don't step on the toes of the weapon they are imitating. However, how is it fair to skill into the other rifles and get an assault variant that is arguably better then the AR? They aren't placeholders, but they are just imitating the AR in the same manner right?
By this logic, as I have said before, either the AR variants need to be just as good compared to their respective rifles as the assault variants are, or the assault variants need to underperform the AR just as much as its variants do.
Vae Victis
Valor Vet, R.I.P MAG
|
Cat Merc
Ahrendee Mercenaries Dirt Nap Squad.
8034
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 12:54:00 -
[72] - Quote
Nosid Katona wrote:Stupid Blueberry wrote:Hansei Kaizen wrote:Has anyone mentioned the Burst AR and Breach AR, are they as absolutely horrible as I've experienced, or is it just me? Why does only the Creodron drop as loot? WHYYYYY?!
Had 20 something burst and breach advanced still in stock since I started out last year. Put them on my commando and burned through them with a KDR of 0.2 ... (my standard KDR atm is about 3 with any other fuckin weapon tm).
What is the purpose of the breach weapons in general? I find them all crappy as ****. TAC was a placeholder for the Scrambler Rifle Breach was placeholder for the Rail Rifle Burst was placeholder for the Combat Rifle They're laughable because it wouldn't be fair to skill into Gallente AR and have 4 variants that worked just as well as the racial counterparts they were mimicing. I love when people bring this up, It is so easy to demolish this argument. Placeholders they may have been, and I won't argue that they would need a downside so they don't step on the toes of the weapon they are imitating. However, how is it fair to skill into the other rifles and get an assault variant that is arguably better then the AR? They aren't placeholders, but they are just imitating the AR in the same manner right? By this logic, as I have said before, either the AR variants need to be just as good compared to their respective rifles as the assault variants are, or the assault variants need to underperform the AR just as much as its variants do. It's funny really, all three of the AR variants are mathematically (and can confirm that for the ACR, also in gameplay) better than the AR in almost evey way imagineable.
So yeah, argument demolished.
My intentions is to have a fun game for everyone.
If I seem to be biased, I have good hard data to back it up.
|
Sergeant Sazu
SINISTER DEATH SQUAD
33
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 17:33:00 -
[73] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Sergeant Sazu wrote:Well I think the Assault Rifle's advantage over the others is... it's extreme ease of use. Disregard it's effectiveness, and remember that it's very easy to land hits. Well, I've been using Assault Rifles all the time since Dust came out, so maybe it's just me.
But think about it. Almost all the rifles have something little about them that make them a little harder to use. Although insgnificant, they make mistakes more likely. And by "use" I simply mean landing hits at intended range, not how good the weapon is. Rail Rifle: Unstable, spool time Combat Rifle: Burst fire can be hard for some, especially with lag Laser Rifle: You have to be extremely precise Scrambler Rifle: Managing heat, knowing exactly when to realease a charge
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the Assault Combat Rifle and Assault Rifle are the only rifles that don't have some kind of tiny downside. Rail Rifle - Spool time is 0.25 seconds, as fast as the human reaction time + with maxed operation stability isn't an issue Combat Rifle - It has +200 DPS for that Burst Fire. I'm sorry but that is FAR too much. Laser Rifle - I never argued about the laser rifle Scrambler Rifle - But in return you get insane DPS, accuracy, and range. I don't think it's a problem because of the -20% armor damage reduction, making it tough to use when fighting heavies. AR is just inferior, the skill requirement to use these weapons (besides the LR) is still damn low, pretty much anyone can overcome the issues and make them better than the AR by a longshot.
I never said that the Assault Rifle is superior, balanced, or that the other weapons suck. Just sharing my praise of my favorite weapon and it's absurd ease of use. Notice how I said nothing about damage or how well it does. I also stated that these qualities of the other rifles are insignificant. If the "usage downsides" I listed don't affect your gameplay, cool, that's good for you. But not everyone is the same. Please read all of my post before throwing your opinion at my face. 'K? :)
Both my shield and armor recover 20HP/s.
Your argument is invalid.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |