DUST Search - CCP: Get rid of Vehicle Recall

All Channels

General Discussions

CCP: Get rid of Vehicle Recall

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 156	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:17:00 - [1] - Quote We used to not have it.Bring it back.Tanks are cheaper now.Rail turret has the longest range of any wepon except the sniper rifle which the tank is immune to.Tanks used to be expensive I could see it back then but not now. Hear that ? Here come the trolls...... Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 156	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:17:00 - [2] - Quote Reserved Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist
Aero Yassavi Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 6751	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:23:00 - [3] - Quote Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it was at full armor and shield. And Aero said unto his children, "LET THERE BE A REGISTRY" CPM Info and Q&A -Status: Open
Racro 01 Arifistan 501st Knights of Leanbox INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS 158	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:25:00 - [4] - Quote Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it was at full armor and shield. best part i like about this idea is makeing shield tanks sacrifice one of thier lows for a armour repper :p. but hey. all vehicles arent as good as the gallente's.
Aero Yassavi Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 6751	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:26:00 - [5] - Quote Racro 01 Arifistan wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it was at full armor and shield. best part i like about this idea is makeing shield tanks sacrifice one of thier lows for a armour repper :p. but hey. all vehicles arent as good as the gallente's. Or carry a repair tool on their dropsuit or find a supply depot, neither of which should be a problem because the whole idea is you are no longer recalling in the heat of battle, which is where the real problems occur. And Aero said unto his children, "LET THERE BE A REGISTRY" CPM Info and Q&A -Status: Open
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 156	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:26:00 - [6] - Quote Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it was at full armor and shield. Oh you mean the guys that call in there tanks just to blow up neutral turret and then recall it? Yeah all the more resaon to implement it.Anything that reduces farming is a good thing. Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist
R F Gyro Clones 4u 1153	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:29:00 - [7] - Quote Getting rid of vehicle recall would effectively force players to choose between vehicle or infantry. Make it harder, sure, but please don't remove it entirely. How about increasing the time taken to recall, and restarting the recall timer if the vehicle takes damage? RF Gyro: 12.5% damage bonus; 10.5% rate of fire bonus
Adelia Lafayette Science For Death 666	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:30:00 - [8] - Quote I think it doesnt need removed but should require rdv pick up so there is more time to finish it. Assault dropship gets blown up.... (Gò»°Gûí°n+ëGò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+ "Kitten this I'm out"... ..."I'm back"
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2545	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:30:00 - [9] - Quote Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it is at full armor and shield. Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Intelligence is OP
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 158	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:35:00 - [10] - Quote Adelia Lafayette wrote: I think it doesnt need removed but should require rdv pick up so there is more time to finish it. This I can agree with. I also feel the vehicle recall "spinner" should be slower if Recalling is not removed. Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist

Bendtner92 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 1673	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:36:00 - [11] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Instead of being so negative you could tell CCP to add some more Supply Depots in more vehicle friendly places. CCP might not listen to you (given that we already told them to add more Supply Depots), but you would be better of doing that instead of being so negative towards good ideas. Winner of the EU Squad Cup & the closed beta Tester's Tournament. Go Go Power Rangers! R.I.P MAG.
R F Gyro Clones 4u 1153	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:37:00 - [12] - Quote Evicer wrote: EDIT: EVE also has a nifty little saying."dont fly what you cant afford to buy" Its actually "don't fly what you can't afford to lose". And if you told Eve players that they couldn't leave their ships without losing them there'd be a riot (apart from supercap pilots, obviously, who are already stuffed in that respect). RF Gyro: 12.5% damage bonus; 10.5% rate of fire bonus
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 158	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:38:00 - [13] - Quote Bendtner92 wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Instead of being so negative you could tell CCP to add some more Supply Depots in more vehicle friendly places. CCP might not listen to you (given that we already told them to add more Supply Depots), but you would be better of doing that instead of being so negative towards good ideas. More crutch for repping/resupplying a tank Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 158	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:41:00 - [14] - Quote R F Gyro wrote: Evicer wrote: EDIT: EVE also has a nifty little saying."dont fly what you cant afford to buy" Its actually "don't fly what you can't afford to lose". And if you told Eve players that they couldn't leave their ships without losing them there'd be a riot (apart from supercap pilots, obviously, who are already stuffed in that respect). You leave your ship your in your pod with no weapons and able to be blown to bits in an instant.So i guess what your saying is ,is that your for people leaving there vehicles and having no weapons.Make a thread. EDIT:and please stop making comparisons.Your ship just stays there and is vulnerable to be being blown up while you are gone from it and you can never "recall it" Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist
Smooth Assassin Stardust Incorporation IMMORTAL REGIME 851	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:42:00 - [15] - Quote A tank is not immune to a sniper rifle, it is only weakened... *Assassination is my thing.*
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2545	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:43:00 - [16] - Quote Bendtner92 wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Instead of being so negative you could tell CCP to add some more Supply Depots in more vehicle friendly places. CCP might not listen to you (given that we already told them to add more Supply Depots), but you would be better of doing that instead of being so negative towards good ideas. Recall isnt that big of a problem, infact i dont see it as a problem Its like when a protostomper goes to a depot to swap out to a BPO fit to save it Intelligence is OP
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 158	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:47:00 - [17] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Bendtner92 wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Instead of being so negative you could tell CCP to add some more Supply Depots in more vehicle friendly places. CCP might not listen to you (given that we already told them to add more Supply Depots), but you would be better of doing that instead of being so negative towards good ideas. Recall isnt that big of a problem, infact i dont see it as a problem Its like when a protostomper goes to a depot to swap out to a BPO fit to save it 6 tanks in Ambush is a problem. When it now takes 3 guys using av to blow up a tank mathematically that equals 18 That means everyone on your team has to be using av the way it is now.IF one of those tanks takes damage it drives off and is recalled. Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist
Cody Sietz Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising 2233	Posted - 2014.02.15 16:57:00 - [18] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it is at full armor and shield. Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Deal. "I do agree with you there though. shudders" -Arkena Wyrnspire
CRYPT3C W0LF Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic 370	Posted - 2014.02.15 17:00:00 - [19] - Quote Maybe it could be implemented as a module? You activate it and It would recall you're vehicle? Long 500 second recharge time? COOKIE MASTER RACE ^__^ Youtube, A Merc with a passion
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 158	Posted - 2014.02.15 17:06:00 - [20] - Quote CRYPT3C W0LF wrote: Maybe it could be implemented as a module? You activate it and It would recall you're vehicle? Long 500 second recharge time? That or a skill. Hacking at first is super slow until you invest some sp into it.Then you hack faster.I do like your idea though.Make it like a transponder and they have to use a slot.Thats a good direction .Thank you for your input. Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist

Vrain Matari Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic 1578	Posted - 2014.02.15 17:08:00 - [21] - Quote I'd propose that instead of full shields/armor we make it so that the tank can't be recalled if modules are active or in cooldown. Also can't be recalled is taking fire or burning. RDV pickup would be nice but the game client is struggling as it is so i'd say the 'dissolve into/by nanites method is fine. I can't believe i'm agreeing with Takahiro, but the full sheilds/armor requirement unduly punishes some fits. I support SP rollover.
KingBabar The Rainbow Effect Negative-Feedback 1899	Posted - 2014.02.15 17:09:00 - [22] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it is at full armor and shield. Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Yes definately! I'm tired of chasing someone with next to no hp just to have him morph into a fatty with HMG right infront of me. It also should take longer and be a risk in itself. Same goes for stepping in and out of vehicles. The top of it having a 1500 hp fatty instantly dropping out of a LAV, going around it and instantly dissappearing when fired upon into that LAV and drive off. If he either had to be at the drivers door or spend, lets say 1 second, where he was voulnerable l'd be ok with it. As it is now its just too cheap, same goes for the tanker who loses 95% of its hp and drive around the corner and he gets rid of the ptential isk loss in what? 5 seconds? Its a cheap mechanic that breaks the oh so sweet risk vs reward system we have in this game. Or to flip it around, would you be ok with me swapping from my 235 k isk protlogi to a starter fit in about 5 seconds, anywhere on the map? Like pilotes have it now? That would really cut my isk loss when l'm about to be cornered and lose a suit. Perhaps we for once agree upon something? Ring the bells, remove cheap and easily exploited mechanics for both infantry and vehicles! FU and FU Dust community, you're mostly a bunch of moronic carebear crybabies. Get good.
Beck Weathers Ghosts of Dawn General Tso's Alliance 456	Posted - 2014.02.15 17:09:00 - [23] - Quote Evicer wrote: R F Gyro wrote: Evicer wrote: EDIT: EVE also has a nifty little saying."dont fly what you cant afford to buy" Its actually "don't fly what you can't afford to lose". And if you told Eve players that they couldn't leave their ships without losing them there'd be a riot (apart from supercap pilots, obviously, who are already stuffed in that respect). You leave your ship your in your pod with no weapons and able to be blown to bits in an instant.So i guess what your saying is ,is that your for people leaving there vehicles and having no weapons.Make a thread. EDIT:and please stop making comparisons.Your ship just stays there and is vulnerable to be being blown up while you are gone from it and you can never "recall it" In eve they have an agro timmer, if they get in a fight and wait off their agro timmer they can redock to safty even in the middle of getting thwir butt kicked. This is pretty much a recall. Now if you could stop your QQ long enough to listen to reasonable ideas i also think an rdv should come pick it up.
R F Gyro Clones 4u 1157	Posted - 2014.02.15 17:10:00 - [24] - Quote Evicer wrote: You leave your ship your in your pod with no weapons and able to be blown to bits in an instant.So i guess what your saying is ,is that your for people leaving there vehicles and having no weapons.Make a thread. EDIT:and please stop making comparisons.Your ship just stays there and is vulnerable to be being blown up while you are gone from it and you can never "recall it" No, you just warp to a station/POS and change ships. Simple. Actually, I think I'd support only being able to recall vehicles at supply depots, which is the equivalent. RF Gyro: 12.5% damage bonus; 10.5% rate of fire bonus
Vrain Matari Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic 1578	Posted - 2014.02.15 17:30:00 - [25] - Quote R F Gyro wrote: Evicer wrote: You leave your ship your in your pod with no weapons and able to be blown to bits in an instant.So i guess what your saying is ,is that your for people leaving there vehicles and having no weapons.Make a thread. EDIT:and please stop making comparisons.Your ship just stays there and is vulnerable to be being blown up while you are gone from it and you can never "recall it" No, you just warp to a station/POS and change ships. Simple. Actually, I think I'd support only being able to recall vehicles at supply depots, which is the equivalent. That would be a hilariously interesting mechanic, since tankers would have to struggle with the 'should i blow up the depot to limit AV?' question. Would be too easy to boobytrap the dopots though. I support SP rollover.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2545	Posted - 2014.02.15 17:35:00 - [26] - Quote Evicer wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Bendtner92 wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Instead of being so negative you could tell CCP to add some more Supply Depots in more vehicle friendly places. CCP might not listen to you (given that we already told them to add more Supply Depots), but you would be better of doing that instead of being so negative towards good ideas. Recall isnt that big of a problem, infact i dont see it as a problem Its like when a protostomper goes to a depot to swap out to a BPO fit to save it 6 tanks in Ambush is a problem. When it now takes 3 guys using av to blow up a tank mathematically that equals 18 That means everyone on your team has to be using av the way it is now.IF one of those tanks takes damage it drives off and is recalled. Why is the 3 man AV team not taking all the tanks out 1 by 1? Why do you need a brand new 3 man AV team for each tank? Intelligence is OP
Cat Merc Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 6523	Posted - 2014.02.15 17:39:00 - [27] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Evicer wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Bendtner92 wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Instead of being so negative you could tell CCP to add some more Supply Depots in more vehicle friendly places. CCP might not listen to you (given that we already told them to add more Supply Depots), but you would be better of doing that instead of being so negative towards good ideas. Recall isnt that big of a problem, infact i dont see it as a problem Its like when a protostomper goes to a depot to swap out to a BPO fit to save it 6 tanks in Ambush is a problem. When it now takes 3 guys using av to blow up a tank mathematically that equals 18 That means everyone on your team has to be using av the way it is now.IF one of those tanks takes damage it drives off and is recalled. Why is the 3 man AV team not taking all the tanks out 1 by 1? Why do you need a brand new 3 man AV team for each tank? Because you can't respond to all the AV needs around the map. 5 points, one tank on each point, one AV team. By the time they get to one tank the last one has already called in a new one. Shield regeneration bonus for Gallente Assault is about as useful as Sharpshooter for Nova Knives. Tuna > Tacos
Scheneighnay McBob Learning Coalition College 4036	Posted - 2014.02.15 17:48:00 - [28] - Quote We need to option to flip vehicles, first. I've had a lot of instanced where I've had to recall my dropship because it was deployed on its side. I am your scan error.
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 10810	Posted - 2014.02.15 17:51:00 - [29] - Quote FU in the forehead with a +3 Iron Mallet of Smiting Incubus becomes useless as soon as you do that. Videos / Fiction Closed Beta Vet; Incubus Pilot
Darken-Soul BIG BAD W0LVES 679	Posted - 2014.02.15 17:58:00 - [30] - Quote CRYPT3C W0LF wrote: Maybe it could be implemented as a module? You activate it and It would recall you're vehicle? Long 500 second recharge time? Think about that for a bit. Who wants some?

Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 2546	Posted - 2014.02.15 18:01:00 - [31] - Quote Cat Merc wrote: Because you can't respond to all the AV needs around the map. 5 points, one tank on each point, one AV team. By the time they get to one tank the last one has already called in a new one. Maybe, maybe not Even if they do keep taking out tanks they are lining the pockets of the AV players and also doing a damn good job and keeping them busy Then can cause the pilots to lose a lot of tanks and maybe isk Plays into the AV players hands tbh, they are there to destroy vehicles, if enemy keeps bring in vehicles then AV team is happy Intelligence is OP
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 168	Posted - 2014.02.16 08:20:00 - [32] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: We need to option to flip vehicles, first. I've had a lot of instanced where I've had to recall my dropship because it was deployed on its side. That is the only reason why it existed and why it was created in the first place.They still have yet to fix the flip for all vehicles and the current system is being used as an exploit. Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 168	Posted - 2014.02.16 08:26:00 - [33] - Quote Beck Weathers wrote: Evicer wrote: R F Gyro wrote: Evicer wrote: EDIT: EVE also has a nifty little saying."dont fly what you cant afford to buy" Its actually "don't fly what you can't afford to lose". And if you told Eve players that they couldn't leave their ships without losing them there'd be a riot (apart from supercap pilots, obviously, who are already stuffed in that respect). You leave your ship your in your pod with no weapons and able to be blown to bits in an instant.So i guess what your saying is ,is that your for people leaving there vehicles and having no weapons.Make a thread. EDIT:and please stop making comparisons.Your ship just stays there and is vulnerable to be being blown up while you are gone from it and you can never "recall it" In eve they have an agro timmer, if they get in a fight and wait off their agro timmer they can redock to safty even in the middle of getting thwir butt kicked. This is pretty much a recall. Now if you could stop your QQ long enough to listen to reasonable ideas i also think an rdv should come pick it up. There is no agro timer here in Dust.please bring up another point that I can shatter. Blaster tank agro's infantry goes back and recalls. Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist
darkiller240 WarRavens League of Infamy 393	Posted - 2014.02.16 08:29:00 - [34] - Quote Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it is at full armor and shield. Half amour Like it is now "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein
Godin Thekiller OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1706	Posted - 2014.02.16 08:37:00 - [35] - Quote All these ideas are garbage. Just make it to where 1: recalls 2: call modules have to cooldown 3: vehicle starts repairing and reloading ammo 4: vehicle can't be recalled until 2 and 3 is done, but after they are, it can be called. 'lights cigar' fuck with me, and I'll melt your face off. Gallente forever! Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
Operative 1171 Aajli Bragian Order Amarr Empire 1230	Posted - 2014.02.16 09:11:00 - [36] - Quote Lol, give me depots I can actually get to to reload my missiles and then maybe. Rommel, you magnificent bastard, I read your book!
Thrillhouse Van Houten DIOS EX. General Tso's Alliance 81	Posted - 2014.02.16 09:18:00 - [37] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Recall isnt that big of a problem, infact i dont see it as a problem Its like when a protostomper goes to a depot to swap out to a BPO fit to save it Can you believe there are some people out there who think this shouldn't be possible? Here's an idea if vehicles users were to complain about this idea: Only a fully repaired vehicle can be recalled (maybe lengthen the recall time, too). Only a fully repaired dropsuit can be switched at a supply depot. Fair for everyone.
Aero Yassavi Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 6769	Posted - 2014.02.16 09:59:00 - [38] - Quote Evicer wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it was at full armor and shield. Oh you mean the guys that call in there tanks just to blow up neutral turret and then recall it? Yeah all the more resaon to implement it.Anything that reduces farming is a good thing. EDIT: EVE also has a nifty little saying."dont fly what you cant afford to buy" Of course don't use what you can't afford, but that's not what this is about. In EVE you have a way of swapping ships without destroying the one you are in, you know And how is your example any different than a guy who calls in a forge gun fit to blow up turrets then swaps? And Aero said unto his children, "LET THERE BE A REGISTRY" CPM Info and Q&A -Status: Open
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui The Containment Unit 381	Posted - 2014.02.16 10:49:00 - [39] - Quote Bendtner92 wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Instead of being so negative you could tell CCP to add some more Supply Depots in more vehicle friendly places. CCP might not listen to you (given that we already told them to add more Supply Depots), but you would be better of doing that instead of being so negative towards good ideas. I don't see this as being negative .. it's just a counter to your proposal .. stop being so sensitive .. should those that value the abilities to swap feel the same? That's the best way to test the fairness of an idea because there's all ways another angle .. decisions effect everyone. Future Caldari Heavy so watch out for this Sumo Shinobi with a Caldari HMG .
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui The Containment Unit 381	Posted - 2014.02.16 10:56:00 - [40] - Quote Darken-Soul wrote: CRYPT3C W0LF wrote: Maybe it could be implemented as a module? You activate it and It would recall you're vehicle? Long 500 second recharge time? Think about that for a bit. Something else that's basically useless to fill a slot that i'm getting for no charge as we speak , like no point giving CRU's .. no thanks .. already have enough to spend SP's on. Future Caldari Heavy so watch out for this Sumo Shinobi with a Caldari HMG .

MarasdF Loron Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 165	Posted - 2014.02.16 11:10:00 - [41] - Quote Evicer wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it was at full armor and shield. Oh you mean the guys that call in there tanks just to blow up neutral turret and then recall it? Yeah all the more resaon to implement it.Anything that reduces farming is a good thing. EDIT: EVE also has a nifty little saying."dont fly what you cant afford to buy" Do you realize that most people "farm" the neutral installations and enemy installation just because they want to feel a little bit safer flying a dropship after that? Also don't even begin to compare how stuff is in EVE. Evicer wrote: Bendtner92 wrote: Instead of being so negative you could tell CCP to add some more Supply Depots in more vehicle friendly places. CCP might not listen to you (given that we already told them to add more Supply Depots), but you would be better of doing that instead of being so negative towards good ideas. More crutch for repping/resupplying a tank Do you even realize that as it is, some map configurations have no supply depots available for ground vehicles atm? And some have only one, and it's only for one side, not accessible for both sides. R.I.P. Pre-1.7 tanks, you will be missed.
MarasdF Loron Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 165	Posted - 2014.02.16 11:18:00 - [42] - Quote Evicer wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Bendtner92 wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Instead of being so negative you could tell CCP to add some more Supply Depots in more vehicle friendly places. CCP might not listen to you (given that we already told them to add more Supply Depots), but you would be better of doing that instead of being so negative towards good ideas. Recall isnt that big of a problem, infact i dont see it as a problem Its like when a protostomper goes to a depot to swap out to a BPO fit to save it 6 tanks in Ambush is a problem. When it now takes 3 guys using av to blow up a tank mathematically that equals 18 That means everyone on your team has to be using av the way it is now.IF one of those tanks takes damage it drives off and is recalled. Because every single AV guy has to be hitting different tanks, right? They can't possibly think about concentrating fire? R.I.P. Pre-1.7 tanks, you will be missed.
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 171	Posted - 2014.02.19 16:57:00 - [43] - Quote MarasdF Loron wrote: Evicer wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Bendtner92 wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Instead of being so negative you could tell CCP to add some more Supply Depots in more vehicle friendly places. CCP might not listen to you (given that we already told them to add more Supply Depots), but you would be better of doing that instead of being so negative towards good ideas. Recall isnt that big of a problem, infact i dont see it as a problem Its like when a protostomper goes to a depot to swap out to a BPO fit to save it 6 tanks in Ambush is a problem. When it now takes 3 guys using av to blow up a tank mathematically that equals 18 That means everyone on your team has to be using av the way it is now.IF one of those tanks takes damage it drives off and is recalled. Because every single AV guy has to be hitting different tanks, right? They can't possibly think about concentrating fire? Because team chat is used So much and doesnt cause fatl errors right? Next..... Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides 2519	Posted - 2014.02.19 17:09:00 - [44] - Quote Just make it so you canGÇÖt recall a vehicle while a module is on cooldown. We still need recall for when vehicles get stuck. We just donGÇÖt want to see people recalling them to avoid losing them to AV. If they chicken out at the sight of AV and recall rather than fighting that is one thing, but if they use up all their cooldowns, and then recall in order to call in another tank with fresh cooldowns, that is a bit of an exploit of the system. Not allowing recall for vehicles with a module on cooldown would prevent this. Fox Gaden: DUST Wall of Fame, 2014
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 171	Posted - 2014.02.19 17:15:00 - [45] - Quote Fox Gaden wrote: Just make it so you canGÇÖt recall a vehicle while a module is on cooldown. We still need recall for when vehicles get stuck. We just donGÇÖt want to see people recalling them to avoid losing them to AV. If they chicken out at the sight of AV and recall rather than fighting that is one thing, but if they use up all their cooldowns, and then recall in order to call in another tank with fresh cooldowns, that is a bit of an exploit of the system. Not allowing recall for vehicles with a module on cooldown would prevent this. Its not about Cool downs its about Damage Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 171	Posted - 2014.02.19 17:17:00 - [46] - Quote MarasdF Loron wrote: Evicer wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it was at full armor and shield. Oh you mean the guys that call in there tanks just to blow up neutral turret and then recall it? Yeah all the more resaon to implement it.Anything that reduces farming is a good thing. EDIT: EVE also has a nifty little saying."dont fly what you cant afford to buy" Do you realize that most people "farm" the neutral installations and enemy installation just because they want to feel a little bit safer flying a dropship after that? Also don't even begin to compare how stuff is in EVE. Evicer wrote: Bendtner92 wrote: Instead of being so negative you could tell CCP to add some more Supply Depots in more vehicle friendly places. CCP might not listen to you (given that we already told them to add more Supply Depots), but you would be better of doing that instead of being so negative towards good ideas. More crutch for repping/resupplying a tank Do you even realize that as it is, some map configurations have no supply depots available for ground vehicles atm? And some have only one, and it's only for one side, not accessible for both sides. Shut up.... your obviously a "crutch" tanker. Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist
Nihilus Warwick Pradox One Proficiency V. 78	Posted - 2014.02.19 17:39:00 - [47] - Quote Evicer wrote: We used to not have it.Bring it back.Tanks are cheaper now.Rail turret has the longest range of any wepon except the sniper rifle which the tank is immune to.Tanks used to be expensive I could see it back then but not now. Hear that ? Here come the trolls...... I think that a vehicle should be able to be recalled, but only in specific areas. There are structures on the map that look like landing pads. Make drop ships have to land on one, and then recall it. There are some places on the map that looked like big old container/garages. Make it so you have to pull you tank or jeep in there. Make it so the recall has a team wide cooldown. Something to make it a little more tactical to deploy your vehicle, and not just recall and redeploy every time your vehicle takes damage.
AP Grasshopper The Unit 514 178	Posted - 2014.02.19 18:11:00 - [48] - Quote Gotta pay the troll toll....
Flix Keptick Red Star. EoN. 3457	Posted - 2014.02.19 18:14:00 - [49] - Quote oh FUUUUUUUUUCK no, just get ccp to implement an agression timer (or whatever it's called) just like in EVE. can't recall if you took damage in the last 45 seconds. The community is the worst thing that ever happened to this game. Tank driver // specialized tank destroyer
Evicer THE HECATONCHIRES 171	Posted - 2014.02.19 18:23:00 - [50] - Quote Flix Keptick wrote: oh FUUUUUUUUUCK no, just get ccp to implement an agression timer (or whatever it's called) just like in EVE. can't recall if you took damage in the last 45 seconds. 45 seconds ....lol how bout if your afraid to loose it you go back to the redline and stay there or be forced to use reppers or risk getting out to rep it with a rep gun .....oh but wait ...we cant have that oh no . Fortune favors the Bold,but Success favors the Resolute Unbent,Unburdened, UNSTOPPABLE Amarr loyalist

Sarus Rambo Legion of Seven 8	Posted - 2014.02.19 18:31:00 - [51] - Quote Why not just have an RDV come pick it up. RDV should fly from the war barge, all the way to the drop zone, then pick it up and fly back. Same with dropping a vehicle off, should fly down with the vehicle. Makes it so you cant drop a vehicle into a hot zone without a ton of risk, or get a vehicle picked up from a hot zone without a ton of risk. You want you vehicle to be recalled, run back to behind your red line and waste a bunch of time. I would love to see the MCC actually become something more then just another spawn point. Why not implement an aerial vehicle hanger, for deployment of drop ships and later on fighters? RDV's could be launched from here. would be kick ass.
Marc Rime 269	Posted - 2014.02.19 18:39:00 - [52] - Quote Recall was added for a reason, and it was a good reason. The functionality should be changed, however, because the way it works now sucks. An aggression timer might help. Only allow recall if there's been no incoming damage or use of weapons for x seconds. Then, once recall has been activated, it should sit there for y seconds, and any incoming damage should abort the whole process.
Flix Keptick Red Star. EoN. 3461	Posted - 2014.02.20 14:34:00 - [53] - Quote Evicer wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: oh FUUUUUUUUUCK no, just get ccp to implement an agression timer (or whatever it's called) just like in EVE. can't recall if you took damage in the last 45 seconds. 45 seconds ....lol how bout if your afraid to loose it you go back to the redline and stay there or be forced to use reppers or risk getting out to rep it with a rep gun .....oh but wait ...we cant have that oh no . I couldn't care less. Want to know why? Because I already do that (rep gun) and because I only recall when I want to switch fits. I'm not a "oh ***, I took 1 damage. let's recall" little btch. And the 45 seconds was just a suggestion, make that 2 minutes if you want. The community is the worst thing that ever happened to this game. Tank driver // specialized tank destroyer
Rasatsu Much Crying Old Experts 1071	Posted - 2014.02.20 14:39:00 - [54] - Quote Also get rid of refitting at supply depots without losing the BPC's of the currently worn equipment... (though if there's shared modules/eq/weapons they should not be used up)
Atiim Living Like Larry Schwag 4846	Posted - 2014.02.20 14:42:00 - [55] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it is at full armor and shield. Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Give infantry a 9,000 eHP increase and It would seem fair. Atiim (Gunnlogi - 80GJ Particle Cannon) Tank Scrub AFK No seriously. My lunch break's over now. :(
Tectonic Fusion 1078	Posted - 2014.02.20 15:35:00 - [56] - Quote Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it is at full armor and shield. So if a derp nublet is randomly shooting his Scrambler Rifle at the dropship/LAV/MAV/HAV they can't recall it even if they a fair ways away? Solo Player Squad status: Locked
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides 2548	Posted - 2014.02.20 15:49:00 - [57] - Quote Evicer wrote: 6 tanks in Ambush is a problem. When it now takes 3 guys using av to blow up a tank mathematically that equals 18 That means everyone on your team has to be using av the way it is now.IF one of those tanks takes damage it drives off and is recalled. Actually, if you have enough AV to blow up 1 tank, you theoretically have enough AV to blow up 6 tanks, one at a time. However, there other variables that interfere with this: - AV efficacy being hampered due to multiple tanks engaging the AV while the targeted tank retreats to lick its wounds. - Amo supply concerns. - Tankers spawning new tanks as fast as the AV can destroy them. For maximum efficacy I would probably want twice as many AV to deal with 6 tanks as I would need to deal with 1 tank. So if 3 AV can kill 1 tank, then I would want 6 dedicated AV to deal with 6 tanks. Fox Gaden: DUST Wall of Fame, 2014
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides 2548	Posted - 2014.02.20 15:52:00 - [58] - Quote Atiim wrote: Give infantry a 9,000 eHP increase and It would seem fair. M.T.A.C. ? Fox Gaden: DUST Wall of Fame, 2014
bogeyman m Learning Coalition College 109	Posted - 2014.02.21 01:12:00 - [59] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it is at full armor and shield. Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Yes.
bogeyman m Learning Coalition College 109	Posted - 2014.02.21 01:20:00 - [60] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Bendtner92 wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Full armor and shield Some maps dont have a depot in the back to rep your armor, some fits dont have an armor rep on because its a shield based fit and you may escape with half armor How about you cant swap your infantry fit until you are at full shield/armor and have all equipment and ammo on you does that sound fair? Instead of being so negative you could tell CCP to add some more Supply Depots in more vehicle friendly places. CCP might not listen to you (given that we already told them to add more Supply Depots), but you would be better of doing that instead of being so negative towards good ideas. Recall isnt that big of a problem, infact i dont see it as a problem Its like when a protostomper goes to a depot to swap out to a BPO fit to save it Although not exactly the same, Infantry flip-flopping between suits is entirely too easy... But at least they have to be at a Supply Depot to do so. (Or die trying.)

bogeyman m Learning Coalition College 112	Posted - 2014.02.21 01:41:00 - [61] - Quote Sarus Rambo wrote: Why not just have an RDV come pick it up. RDV should fly from the war barge, all the way to the drop zone, then pick it up and fly back. Same with dropping a vehicle off, should fly down with the vehicle. Makes it so you cant drop a vehicle into a hot zone without a ton of risk, or get a vehicle picked up from a hot zone without a ton of risk. You want you vehicle to be recalled, run back to behind your red line and waste a bunch of time. I would love to see the MCC actually become something more then just another spawn point. Why not implement an aerial vehicle hanger, for deployment of drop ships and later on fighters? RDV's could be launched from here. would be kick ass. ^this^
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 7378	Posted - 2014.02.21 01:44:00 - [62] - Quote Evicer wrote: We used to not have it.Bring it back.Tanks are cheaper now.Rail turret has the longest range of any wepon except the sniper rifle which the tank is immune to.Tanks used to be expensive I could see it back then but not now. Hear that ? Here come the trolls...... Doesn't necessarily need a full removal, just taking longer to achieve, meaning the pilot must risk their machine a great deal more. Oh and HAV need ISK increases to compensate for their new found power. I actually wouldn't mind my HAV costing pre 1.7 ISK values now since they are so powerful. "Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 1858	Posted - 2014.02.21 01:44:00 - [63] - Quote Evicer wrote: We used to not have it.Bring it back.Tanks are cheaper now.Rail turret has the longest range of any wepon except the sniper rifle which the tank is immune to.Tanks used to be expensive I could see it back then but not now. Hear that ? Here come the trolls...... Only if the only way you can recall a dropsuit is when you have full HP. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Dauth Jenkins Ultramarine Corp 65	Posted - 2014.02.21 02:00:00 - [64] - Quote Evicer wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it was at full armor and shield. Oh you mean the guys that call in there tanks just to blow up neutral turret and then recall it? Yeah all the more resaon to implement it.Anything that reduces farming is a good thing. EDIT: EVE also has a nifty little saying."dont fly what you cant afford to buy" We all focus on the problems, in this case, tanks. But remember that it does affect everyone, like dropships. What if you fly a standard dropship, and you realize that the enemy has a rail tank in their red line. You would want to recall your dropship, as continuing to fly it is a death wish. But you can't, so what, are you going to sit in the back of the map for the rest of the game? Instead, why don't you implement a animation for it, in which the RVD picks it up and leaves, that way you only do it in a spot that's safe. The maps would require a tad of tweeting in order to better protect RVDs in the red line, but that should happen regardless, so it shouldn't be a problem. And to those that oppose the RVD pickup on the grounds that it will be vulnerable while it flies away, you take the same risk when you call it in, so you should take the same risk in recalling it. Sees prototompers... Sees blueberries start to snipe... Pulls out commando suit with laser rifle and swarm launcher...
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 7379	Posted - 2014.02.21 02:05:00 - [65] - Quote Evicer wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Getting rid of vehicle recall all together is not the solution. Vehicles are not needed for an entire match all the time. This was especially painful for dropship pilots in Chromosome who either had to fly a dropship for the rest of the match or crash and burn it if they wanted to continue on foot. A better solution would be not allowing a vehicle to be recalled unless it was at full armor and shield. Oh you mean the guys that call in there tanks just to blow up neutral turret and then recall it? Yeah all the more resaon to implement it.Anything that reduces farming is a good thing. EDIT: EVE also has a nifty little saying."dont fly what you cant afford to buy" That's a poor summary Evicer, you know as well as I do the capacity to reship in EVE is crucial to most long lasting fights, back when I flew more regularly for PIE Inc I was reshipping after every skirmish to a new fit as was required of me, jumping between frigates and destroyers and battleships for IHub work. I only need an HAV on the map as long as the enemy has one, after that I am better suited to be on the points defending and hacking. "Just know that though our enemies may only #YOLO, through God's grace we can #YOLF at his side." - Disciple of Kesha
bogeyman m Krusual Covert Operators Minmatar Republic 185	Posted - 2014.05.17 22:08:00 - [66] - Quote Bump. Duct tape 2.0 > Have WD-40; will travel.
Yeeeuuuupppp The New Age Outlaws Proficiency V. 290	Posted - 2014.05.18 14:19:00 - [67] - Quote If you remove vehicle recalling, remove aim assist also. Time for scrubs to git gud. And btw, missile installations have longer range than the rail. Bring it on CCP. I ain't crying about Legion :D Mic status: Muted Feel the wrath of my troll
bogeyman m Krusual Covert Operators Minmatar Republic 195	Posted - 2014.05.18 18:20:00 - [68] - Quote Bump. Duct tape 2.0 > Have WD-40; will travel.
Spkr4theDead Red Star. EoN. 2081	Posted - 2014.05.18 19:08:00 - [69] - Quote Evicer wrote: We used to not have it.Bring it back.Tanks are cheaper now.Rail turret has the longest range of any wepon except the sniper rifle which the tank is immune to.Tanks used to be expensive I could see it back then but not now. Hear that ? Here come the trolls...... Then that means the only thing you can do at a supply depot is get ammo. The only way you can change suits is when you die. Will you accept that? I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Operative 1125 Lokaas True Companion Planetary Requisitions 187	Posted - 2014.05.18 23:29:00 - [70] - Quote So, let me get this straight. Since you can't recall you leave the tank and then call out another tank. Meanwhile, the tank is still sitting there for another person to hop into and now you have two, three, four tanks on the field. It'd be unreasonable to have the tank despawn too soon. I'd rather the person have the option to put it away and be done with it before calling another. That little bit of brief firepower from another non-recalled tank or two could make a big difference. THIS IS THE VOICE OF RÁN



Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.