| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
m621 zma
OMFGZOMBIESRUN
71
   |
Posted - 2014.01.02 19:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
In an FPS game? I think so. |
Skihids
Bullet Cluster
Legacy Rising
2624
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 19:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
I've advocated a FPV for dropships that would eliminate any need for a TPV, but CCP's not made any comment so don't expect anything SOON(tm). |
Quil Evrything
Triple Terrors
627
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 19:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
+1
|
Jason Pearson
3739
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
ONLY IF WE REMOVE IT FROM INFANTRY TOO M6
ohwait..
King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire.
Zaria for Miss Universe 2014
|
True Adamance
Kameira Lodge
Amarr Empire
5339
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:09:00 -
[5] - Quote
m621 zma wrote:In an FPS game? I think so.
Battlefield 3 and 4 , Planetside 2, and more all have 3rd person vehicle views.
To a Texan like you, a hero is some type of weird sandwich, not some nut who takes on three Gunlogi.
Reference = ISK
|
DJINN B4lock
Ancient Textiles.
274
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
I would only advocate for something like this if Dust had Oculus Rift support.
DJINN B4lock, CEO Ancient Textiles. The premium emporium of fine fabrics from the Orient.
|
Midas Fool
Black Phoenix Mercenaries
Legacy Rising
306
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:14:00 -
[7] - Quote
Just....no. Seriously?
I'm sorry the tanks touched you in the bad place again but this is just not the solution.
+25 Kill Assist...+25 Kill Assist...+25 Kill Assist...NO HOW WHY
|
Uncle AWOL Protheans
The Renegades of the Untold Truth
53
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
Add the option. improve it over time, including improving controls.
Maybe remove third person later from certain gamemodes (i.e. PC) if people demand it. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star.
EoN.
2098
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:18:00 -
[9] - Quote
Nope
Intelligence is OP
|
Azura Sakura
Sebiestor Field Sappers
Minmatar Republic
532
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
Only if they allow ADS front turret to become moveable while in 1st person view xD |
|
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
9541
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
No, but I'd love a proper first person cam on my dropship....
Videos
"The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting"
~ Sun Tzu
|
Takron Nistrom
Tinfoil Hatz
159
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:27:00 -
[12] - Quote
No, and also they need a back up cam.
GÇ£Pulvis et umbra sumus. (We are but dust and shadow.)GÇ¥
GÇò Horace, The Odes of Horace
|
Monty Mole Clone
Shiv M
92
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:49:00 -
[13] - Quote
remove 3rd person view and give them actual vehicle controls like multiple gears and an accelerator and brake button.
stuff like that would make them easier to avoid and kill without nerfing them |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
1129
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:54:00 -
[14] - Quote
While we're on the subject I would love a TPV for my dropsuit.
"Always fight dirty, the victor writes history"
Eve toon: Drake Doe, professional hero tackler, full time pretzel boy
|
Tectonic Fusion
921
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:56:00 -
[15] - Quote
Wouldn't change much. Active scanners are still king.
Solo Player
Squad status: Locked
|
Th3rdSun
L.O.T.I.S.
D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
548
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:56:00 -
[16] - Quote
I thought that first person view would be cool for LAVs,but after riding around in the passenger seat with a few people for a while,I'll pass on it as it makes me nauseous. I'm ok with the option for both,but there's no way they should totally remove third person view. |
N1ck Comeau
Ahrendee Mercenaries
EoN.
1728
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
only for tanks. all the other vehicles need it. Or somehow make it so 3rd person view won't show the back of the tank, so someone can sneak on it.
Minmatar Assault.
Confused on what weapons i should use :/
|
Aizen Intiki
Hell's Gate Inc
League of Infamy
630
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:58:00 -
[18] - Quote
Nope. FPV would need to become better before that happens. make FPV better, and we can talk.
EDIT: Also, you would need to explain where the vehicle's camera drones went as well.
"Hello, world!" lol, sounds like something a whore lover would say
Alt of the great Godin
I like chocolate ^___^
|
ADAM-OF-EVE
Dead Man's Game
711
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 20:59:00 -
[19] - Quote
Takron Nistrom wrote:No, and also they need a back up cam.
and one of those reversing beepers they have on trucks so i know when i'm about to be crushed
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99075&find
|
ADAM-OF-EVE
Dead Man's Game
711
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 21:04:00 -
[20] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote:
EDIT: Also, you would need to explain where the vehicle's camera drones went as well.
i never got this vehicle camera drones thing with eve and now dust. its makes absolutly no sense to me at all. surely your in your vehicle and you have an array of sensors. it makes far more sense to me that you are plugged into these sensors and they create an highly advanced overlay of the area picturing you in the middle. this whole micro drones flying around you is just stupid. your ship can barely survive a bomb blast... i want what those drones are made of because they can survive a doomsday blast
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99075&find
|
|
|
Smooth Assassin
Stardust Incorporation
642
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 21:07:00 -
[21] - Quote
definitely, stops them using third person to see me placing remotes behind em.
Assassination is my thing.
|
Monty Mole Clone
Shiv M
92
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 21:39:00 -
[22] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Nope
why not? its not like your invulnerable to people without av, typical tank scrub defending his best advantage against infantry. get rid of this **** ccp, how many advantages do people want ffs |
Suanar Daranaus
Seykal Expeditionary Group
Minmatar Republic
102
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 21:45:00 -
[23] - Quote
I would like it better to have options on the POV |
NOAMIzzzzz
FREE AGENTS LP
86
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 21:52:00 -
[24] - Quote
Pls no. |
One Eyed King
Eyniletti Rangers
Minmatar Republic
121
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 21:53:00 -
[25] - Quote
I wouldn't mind the third person perspective as long is it was done in such a way that created blind spots. I don't think it should hinder driving, aka what the heck am I running into that I can't drive over, but I don't think it should be able to give them better field awareness of infantry sneaking up on them.
Maybe it could be limited to just the front or side portion of the tank, unless moving backwards?
It sounds like a lot of work for a minor fix, but it would be nice to be addressed eventually.
Nova knifing scout masochist. I would be a sadist, but CCP won't let me.
|
Leonid Tybalt
Dark Knightz Corp.
84
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 21:56:00 -
[26] - Quote
No, because that means pilots vision would be limited to how fast their ship can dip/climb/turn, and drivers vision would be limited to the turning speed of their turret.
Which would make no sense at all seeing as how modern pilota of today have radar, advanced avionics, a canopy that they can look through in different directions by simply turning their heads etc. And tanks are equipped with periscopes that can be spun around faster than the turret even (which isn't saying much because the turn speed of modern tank turrets of today is way faster than it is in dust).
Would seem incredibly idiotic if the modern tanks and gunships of today have superior vision capabilities to the supposed sci-fi tanks and gunships of the future.
So no, come up with a better idea. |
Leonid Tybalt
Dark Knightz Corp.
84
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 22:02:00 -
[27] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:I wouldn't mind the third person perspective as long is it was done in such a way that created blind spots. I don't think it should hinder driving, aka what the heck am I running into that I can't drive over, but I don't think it should be able to give them better field awareness of infantry sneaking up on them.
Maybe it could be limited to just the front or side portion of the tank, unless moving backwards?
It sounds like a lot of work for a minor fix, but it would be nice to be addressed eventually.
Or just a fog of war mechanic. Large objects like buildings or tanks you just drove past remain visible behind your vehicle if close enough, but infantry running behind your tank get "invisible" unless you turn to actually look behind you.
That is as long as the infantry hasn't shown up on radar, because once you or someone else on the same tacnet has identified it as a redberry then fog of war shouldn't apply.
(remember that all mercs on the same team are a part of the same tacnet and if one merc identifies an enemy that enemy shows up on the radar for friendlies in the vicinity. Which of course apply to vehicles too.) |
True Adamance
Kameira Lodge
Amarr Empire
5343
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 22:20:00 -
[28] - Quote
Monty Mole Clone wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Nope why not? its not like your invulnerable to people without av, typical tank scrub defending his best advantage against infantry. get rid of this **** ccp, how many advantages do people want ffs
Dude comparatively here you are the scrub.....your talking to a guy who probably been playing since Closed Beta, has 25+ Million SP, from a good well known corp and you are calling him the scrub?
I tanked when AV was way OP and tanks were just garbage ISK sinks. HTFU.
To a Texan like you, a hero is some type of weird sandwich, not some nut who takes on three Gunlogi.
Reference = ISK
|
Timtron Victory
Tech Guard
RISE of LEGION
19
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 22:24:00 -
[29] - Quote
When I decided to ride a tank, it didnt switch to FPV, I called another tank and the same thing, its very weird.
It was different in the next game
Proud Christian
Jesus Loves You
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
3376
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 22:24:00 -
[30] - Quote
If non-assault dropships had a non-terrible first-person view, I would be fine with it.
We used to have a time machine
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |