|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
KING CHECKMATE
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
2598
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 03:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
Roger Cordill wrote:Message from Godin: Judge would be fine for this as well. Many pilots also do AV as well (hey, we know our strengths and weaknesses, so why not ), and he has shown that he does in fact have PROTO AV, and can use it (I was the sole survivor of a attack he pulled on me and 2 other bluedots. ******* Wiki Swarms...... Point being, he can do both, and imo is the best option for both.
Message to Godin. Putting a Vehicle user as a Judge sounds pretty biased to me too. Dont forget people , owning some Proto AV does NOT make you a AV SPECIALIST,same as me owning some tanks wont make me a tanker.
Now atiim, i really do appreciate the support, and i AM very flattered, but In around a month as soon as i get the SP necesary i will be ABANDONING AV SPECIALIST ROLE and spec Fully into scouts again.
Now i do agree I would, now being mainly a scout and having enough knowledge on AV weapons ,would make me a less biased judge than you XD LOL
BUT STILL i have 2 flaws that wont work very well with this position bro. 1- English is not my main language there by , believe it or not, i cannot elaborate as precisely as a CPM needs to. 2- Even if i can take enough BS,as soon as Biased ''ideas'' of vehicle users pop up , my immediate response is to propose an intentionally Biased AV proposal, mostly for the trolls...and i think a CPM should be more serious than this.
just saying : /
The Best Damage Mod, its a Headshot....
|
KING CHECKMATE
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
2679
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 03:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Rusty Shallows wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Eheh. I would trust Judge to be a relatively unbiased person.
We don't even know much about what's happening with CPM1, so this is completely pointless anyway. He's not unbiased. No one who calls for blanket nerfs can be. But I think a council with him and KING CHECKMATE would be hilariously entertaining. Might even be productive. No, as much as I like King.....no..... 3 weeks ago maybe, but Atiim compromised him.
Still , if AV'ers ever get a CPM, he must know extensively about vehicles and be a True AV'er (Every time you see a vehicle, you go for it).
Not a vehicle user that happens to have Proto AV weaponry. Like many tankers calling themselves AV specialists....
Just saying :3
Support SCOUTS : https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=124408&find=unread
|
KING CHECKMATE
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
2683
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 03:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:True Adamance wrote:Rusty Shallows wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Eheh. I would trust Judge to be a relatively unbiased person.
We don't even know much about what's happening with CPM1, so this is completely pointless anyway. He's not unbiased. No one who calls for blanket nerfs can be. But I think a council with him and KING CHECKMATE would be hilariously entertaining. Might even be productive. No, as much as I like King.....no..... 3 weeks ago maybe, but Atiim compromised him. Still , if AV'ers ever get a CPM, he must know extensively about vehicles and be a True AV'er (Every time you see a vehicle, you go for it). Not a vehicle user that happens to have Proto AV weaponry.Like many tankers calling themselves AV specialists.... Just saying :3 I have proto AV, proto grenades, and a decent eye for Rail Turret shots.
And yet i'll bet you'll do better/Enjoy more with a Tank and i'll do better with AV weaponry. There by , you are a tanker. I am (was) an AV specialist.
BTW Atiim cannot corrupt me. I have my way to think stuff apart. Plus attim is not a bad person,he just puts a lot of soul in AV weaponry discussions and shows it.
Me; i consider myself cool headed and try to be as unbiased as possible,but when SPR4, Void , or some other Tanker QQ specialist appears they just talk so much nonsense i flip...
Support SCOUTS : https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=124408&find=unread
|
|
|
|