Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4544
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
Source: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1412884#post1412884
CCP LogiBro wrote: The reason why BPOs aren't working as intended is they are having a large negative impact on the ingame economy. For the economy to function properly, items need to be consumed in battle. With BPOs, no items are consumed, which breaks this fundamental requirement.
As far as trading of BPOs, that's not decided yet. I will be taking your feedback though. We'll let you know when we come to a decision.
Personally, I'm ok with having my BPOs locked into the character that I purchased them under so long as nothing else about them are changed in anyway, but that is just me. The community might say otherwise however. That said, I will be in my unbiased mood and help host another public vote just like the one I hosted earlier about the weekly SP cap from long, long ago in a galaxy far, far away.
How this will work is that I will post two replies down below. Each reply is basically one of two votes to cast. You can cast your vote by simply clicking on the "Like" button located on the top-right corner of each of the two replies. I will host this Public Vote for as long as it takes for CCP to notice.
The point of this vote is to get CCP's attention on the issue on whether or not our BPO that are in our hangars (which thankfully we get to keep) get character locked or stay opened for secondary market trading. This is also to help CCP better decide which direction to go for in such a short notice if there is no time to discuss it with the CPM first. It will be most appreciated if the members of the CPM post here for support.
Again, I will be as unbiased as possible while hosting this public vote as always. In addition to that, I will be moderating this thread. Here are the following rules:
1. Your vote will only count if you click the "Like" button in the two options given below. Your reply (although optional) will NOT count. 2. Keep any debates about this issue restricted to the following thread: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=116404 3. Do not post any debates or arguments in this thread as this is strictly for voting purposes only. I don't want people to get distracted by troll posts on this thread. 4. Do not post any replies that are intended to siphon votes from the two main replies I post below. If you do, I will politely ask you to change your post.
Please cooperate if you guys want this to work.
===SEE BELOW===
===THE FOLLOWING TWO REPLIES ARE THE OFFICIAL VOTES===
===ALL OTHER REPLIES DON'T COUNT AS VOTES=== |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4544
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
Reserved |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
4047
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
I want to share my BPOs with friends. Not for profit, but a couple of them I'm never going to use and I'd just like to pass them on to friends. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4544
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
Reserved |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4544
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:I want to share my BPOs with friends. Not for profit, but a couple of them I'm never going to use and I'd just like to pass them on to friends who will be able to make use of them.
Please remove your post. The system locked me up for 30 seconds preventing me from posting the second reply for the official vote. |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
4050
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:I want to share my BPOs with friends. Not for profit, but a couple of them I'm never going to use and I'd just like to pass them on to friends who will be able to make use of them. Please remove your post. The system locked me up for 30 seconds preventing me from posting the second reply for the official vote.
How am I meant to do this? |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4544
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:15:00 -
[7] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:I want to share my BPOs with friends. Not for profit, but a couple of them I'm never going to use and I'd just like to pass them on to friends who will be able to make use of them. Please remove your post. The system locked me up for 30 seconds preventing me from posting the second reply for the official vote. How am I meant to do this?
OK then. I politely ask you to change your post in a way that doesn't confuse the voters. I don't want any votes to get accidentally siphoned. |
Lt Royal
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2051
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:15:00 -
[8] - Quote
1) IGÇÖm not sure that you can remove posts. 2) If so how?
My Feedback I think BPO's should be eventually be made into how they work in EVE. That they require you to actually build the said items with materials. The materials could be gained through the PVE mechanics CCP have said they are working towards. This would then let us put the manufactured items up on the player controlled market for the prices we see fit.
This would then make BPOGÇÖs very valuable to the people who have invested in the skills to manufacture those said items and useless to those who are not looking to skill into manufacturing apart from to sell upon the market.
All in all this will add new meta game mechanics for people to undercut each other to sell their gear. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4546
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
=======REMINDER===== You need to click the "like" button on the two official replies for your vote to count. ===================== |
Jinx Rollin
Commando Perkone Caldari State
32
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:28:00 -
[10] - Quote
I purchased 8 merc packs so have 8 toxins and 8 dragonfly BPO's so yes I would like a way to gift these to another character (don't care about selling them although would be a bonus, just someway to share with others would be nice) |
|
Hellkeizer
The Avutora Complex
161
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:31:00 -
[11] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:=======REMINDER===== You need to click the "like" button on the two official replies for your vote to count. ===================== If it's an unofficial vote why bother liking for a vote to count? |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4551
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:33:00 -
[12] - Quote
Hellkeizer wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:=======REMINDER===== You need to click the "like" button on the two official replies for your vote to count. ===================== If it's an unofficial vote why bother liking for a vote to count?
It will count within the context of this thread. But primarily it's to help grab CCP's attention. It worked before when CCP announced they were making changes to the weekly SP cap way back during the beta days. It should work once more for an issue that is very important to us right now.
EDIT:
I changed the title of the thread to reduce confusion. Thank you for bring this to my attention. |
JW v Weingarten
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
709
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:36:00 -
[13] - Quote
lol, you are just farming likes here. Use http://strawpoll.me/ for the poll |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4551
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:38:00 -
[14] - Quote
Honestly I don't care about the likes. I'm doing this for the sake of helping CCP get an understanding of what the player base wants or feels about the issue of BPOs.
This is a very important topic that affects you and me and I don't want this thread to stray off by something as trivial as "me wanting to farm likes". |
|
CCP Mintchip
C C P C C P Alliance
1701
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:43:00 -
[15] - Quote
Hey! Thanks for this post. I do want to make clear that we are very aware and are at attention about this issue. This is something that we have been processing for a while and want to ultimately make a decision that is best for the game and you; the players! Please leave your feedback here! Voting is great, but articulated feedback is extremely appreciated!
Thank you! CCP Mintchip // Twitter - @CCP_Mintchip Dust 514 Community Rep |
|
Centurion mkII
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
148
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:47:00 -
[16] - Quote
CCP Mintchip wrote:Hey! Thanks for this post. I do want to make clear that we are very aware and are at attention about this issue. This is something that we have been processing for a while and want to ultimately make a decision that is best for the game and you; the players! Please leave your feedback here! Voting is great, but articulated feedback is extremely appreciated! Thank you! Url fail |
Himiko Kuronaga
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
1965
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:47:00 -
[17] - Quote
Why were BPO's put into the game like this in the first place?
Don't pretend you didn't know exactly what the outcome would be. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
2070
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:49:00 -
[18] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Why were BPO's put into the game like this in the first place?
Don't pretend you didn't know exactly what the outcome would be.
to get u to buy the merc packs...
and it worked!!
but that was then.... |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4562
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:50:00 -
[19] - Quote
CCP Mintchip wrote:Hey! Thanks for this post. I do want to make clear that we are very aware and are at attention about this issue. This is something that we have been processing for a while and want to ultimately make a decision that is best for the game and you; the players! Please leave your feedback here! Voting is great, but articulated feedback is extremely appreciated! Thank you!
Yay! Blue Post!
You are correct that articulated feedback is better than a vote, but I guess it wouldn't hurt having both. |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
1875
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:51:00 -
[20] - Quote
I know this may sound simplistic and not complicated enough ....
But ,why can we just use ISK to restock BPO's ?.... i will be happy just having the cosmetic look. Maybe just a bit less ISK to restock them. |
|
Marston VC
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1102
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:51:00 -
[21] - Quote
CCP Mintchip wrote:Hey! Thanks for this post. I do want to make clear that we are very aware and are at attention about this issue. This is something that we have been processing for a while and want to ultimately make a decision that is best for the game and you; the players! Please leave your feedback here! Voting is great, but articulated feedback is extremely appreciated! Thank you!
Why don't you guys just add a poll system to the forums? Then people wouldn't have to articulate the same thing over and over again, they could just vote for a variety of articulations that the author posts. This would enhance feedback efficiency because you guys would be less bogged down reading troll posts, and could just get raw, unbiased statistics. Opinions are nice, but I could care less about why people feel the way they do. I just care about how they feel specifically about an issue. Though the "whys" are sometimes important too. Honestly I just don't like how these forums represent the collective work of thousands of writers over a year long period (far too much text to read and comprehend). |
Himiko Kuronaga
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
1965
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:51:00 -
[22] - Quote
Here is my problem. They knew EXACTLY what was going to happen with the BPO's, yet still sold the BPO's anyway. In fact anyone who has played more than a little EVE could tell you what would happen. Which means that the nerfing of said BPO's was also a planned function down the road.
From the start, they intended on screwing over the early customers.
The screwed up part is they SHOULD be nerfed. But that doesn't mean what transpired here isn't ten kinds of messed up. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4562
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:54:00 -
[23] - Quote
Guys, keep the discussion limited to the thread referenced by CCP. This thread is strictly for voting purposes only. |
Rei Shepard
Spectre II
716
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:56:00 -
[24] - Quote
CCP Mintchip wrote:Hey! Thanks for this post. I do want to make clear that we are very aware and are at attention about this issue. This is something that we have been processing for a while and want to ultimately make a decision that is best for the game and you; the players! Please leave your feedback here! Voting is great, but articulated feedback is extremely appreciated! Thank you!
Well at the start of the game it was suggested that we were able to sell our BPO's at some point in the player market.
I also don't see how free suits composed out of BPO's or the equivalent suit made of isk thats roughly worth 3000 isk can make a diffrence in isk consumed when the payout is equal to 60+ of those suits a match.
If that was clearly comunicated to the players at open beta launch i would not have bought multiple packs of the same, first you collect when you pass start and now you send all the players who supported your game to jail with "locking" our BPO's.
Looks like ill not be buying any packs anymore to support the game if this goes life and i was planning to get my hands on the 2700 suit War kit like i did the Dren pack (and ive never used any of em)
|
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
1875
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:57:00 -
[25] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Guys, keep the discussion limited to the thread referenced by CCP. This thread is strictly for voting purposes only.
Right.... I just copy and paste then... still... not sure how to vote... if you read my answer...... |
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
422
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 17:58:00 -
[26] - Quote
LMFAO
Fail thread.
Broke thread about a broke mechanic in a broke game = LMFAO |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4564
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 18:01:00 -
[27] - Quote
Banning Hammer wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Guys, keep the discussion limited to the thread referenced by CCP. This thread is strictly for voting purposes only. Right.... I just copy and paste then... still... not sure how to vote... if you read my answer......
Just click the "like" button on one of the two official votes I posted below the OP. If you are still unsure, then bring it up with CCP in the thread referenced. Or better yet, get in touch with the CPM. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4564
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 18:07:00 -
[28] - Quote
This would be a whole lot easier if CCP Foxfour hosted this poll. He would be that much closer to changing his name to CCP Soxfour very quickly.
Come one, Foxfour. You know you want it. XD |
Beyobi
Savage Bullet
117
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 18:14:00 -
[29] - Quote
Bpo's should be tradeable. I have 2 sets of skinweave suits, 2 exile rifles that were given to me by ccp through participating in closed beta events. 2 MAG tribute sets, and 5 Gold Guristas LAV I purchased with money. I've heard of other people who purchased upwards of 10 sets of MAG tribute suits with the full intention of selling them later as that is the EvE thing to do. If BPO's become untradeable, will CCP offer a reimbursement of some kind for players with multiple Bpo's? If we can't sell them to other players, will we be able to share across characters on an account? |
Soraya Xel
New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men.
681
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 18:15:00 -
[30] - Quote
It's obvious original poster does not understand that games are not developed by democracy for good reason. |
|
CLONE117
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
422
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 18:21:00 -
[31] - Quote
i think the bpos are just a cheap way to fit a suit with some decent std or mlt modules and equipment.
all those small numbers can add up over time and become expensive.
with a bpo.
that fitting cost has the potential of being reduced greatly in the eyes of a new player.
so i pretty much see bpos as the abillity to make a better fitting with reduced cost.
its better than the free default mlt suits.
as they seem to have more flexibility for fitting.
the main factor i see here is the fact it doesnt cost hardly any isk to run.
although it could be better in the long run.
where players running cheap non bpos r restocking more often then that player with the bpos.
and thus spending possible millions on isk restocking where the player running the bpos could only possibly be spending only a few 100 thousand isk.
this is just my perception on it though. |
IrishWebster
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
81
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 18:30:00 -
[32] - Quote
I'm starting to get the feeling that CCP Shanghai and main body CCP don't have the same views on open world entrepreneurship. In EVE, they give you tools and the PLAYER shapes his own experience. If they put BPOs on the market, they're on the market to be traded, sold, used in bait and switch schemes, etc.
New Eden has always been about creating opportunities, not LIMITING them. Why then is CCP Shanghai trying to hard to stop us from shaping our own experience?
It makes no sense.
+1 for free trade of any and everything that's on the market. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4580
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 18:38:00 -
[33] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:It's obvious original poster does not understand that games are not developed by democracy for good reason.
Yet, CCP is kind enough to get our feedback first. I understand this is not really a democracy and this thread is in no way intended to force CCP's hand in anything. This is just to give them an idea on what to do that is in the best interest of the players and the game given the current situation with the BPOs.
CCP Cmdr Wang made a similar public vote that made my initial efforts official and therefore players felt they have more power. But in the end, CCP is mainly a benevolent dictatorship. Meaning, every decision they make is final, but they do take into consideration what we are looking for. |
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
1219
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 18:46:00 -
[34] - Quote
I just feel like when I asked for a refund for my BPO suits...they should have given it to me...before I speced into them just so I could get some use out of them. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4580
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 18:52:00 -
[35] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:I just feel like when I asked for a refund for my BPO suits...they should have given it to me...before I speced into them just so I could get some use out of them.
If you were around back then during the transition from closed beta to open beta, you would know why CCP had to NOT give the AURUM refund (except for UVTs and Boosters). A few elite players would have had tons of AURUM in their wallets magically appear without spending more cash. |
Canari Elphus
Pro Hic Immortalis
682
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 18:55:00 -
[36] - Quote
Vote #3 - Not Applicable - We will not get p2p trading before I decide to leave this game. |
MassiveNine
0uter.Heaven
272
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:04:00 -
[37] - Quote
Seems kinda messed up that we wouldn't be able to get rid of them, a lot of us bought several BPO's in closed beta while they were cheap with the intention of selling them for profit when the market opened up. It's one of those things that should be considered vital to the game and would be unfair to those that came into the game after BPO's were removed. If they become locked then it's basically giving those who have them an edge over those who don't, and that's not what I call balance. Sure there are going to be some people that don't have them and probably never will, but I think if a player wants to spend a substantial amount of ISK for a BPO that can no longer be acquired through the regular market, then let them do that. |
Soraya Xel
New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men.
682
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:05:00 -
[38] - Quote
My point, Maken, is that just because players want it, even overwhelmingly want it, doesn't mean it's actually a good idea. |
MassiveNine
0uter.Heaven
272
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:08:00 -
[39] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:My point, Maken, is that just because players want it, even overwhelmingly want it, doesn't mean it's actually a good idea.
If selling/trading BPO's is bad, why does it work so well in EVE? |
Seed Dren
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
110
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:20:00 -
[40] - Quote
Banning Hammer wrote:I know this may sound simplistic and not complicated enough .... But ,why can we just use ISK to restock BPO's ?.... i will be happy just having the cosmetic look. Maybe just a bit less ISK to restock them.
Put it on the feedback thread is a good idea. |
|
Xaviah Reaper
Nyain San The Ascendancy
157
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:24:00 -
[41] - Quote
ATTENTION!
to fix the economy, force players to use proto AV and others to use Pythons and Eryxs .... I do and Im f*cking broke :) problem solved. |
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
1219
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:25:00 -
[42] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Cody Sietz wrote:I just feel like when I asked for a refund for my BPO suits...they should have given it to me...before I speced into them just so I could get some use out of them. If you were around back then during the transition from closed beta to open beta, you would know why CCP had to NOT give the AURUM refund (except for UVTs and Boosters). A few elite players would have had tons of AURUM in their wallets magically appear without spending more cash. I was, and a few people I know got refunds. They sent in help tickets and CCP refunded their Aur. I did the same but CCP said no. So I speced Into scout. |
Fire of Prometheus
DUST University Ivy League
1181
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:27:00 -
[43] - Quote
If BPOs are character locked, how am I supposed to get a syndi SMG? |
XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO XOXOXOXOXOXO
Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State
436
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:27:00 -
[44] - Quote
hell yes to free trade
I dont want to have all these duplicates in my inventory
what a waste |
DJINN Marauder
Ancient Exiles
2108
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:30:00 -
[45] - Quote
Like farming |
Doc Noah
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
691
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:31:00 -
[46] - Quote
Personally I want hear what CCP wants to do with BPOs in the first place before I vote. My main assumption is that CCP is gonna implement a crafting + material system. While BPOs wont be the 100% free fit item like it is now, it'll be more cost effective to craft it vs buying the item straight from the marketplace. Thats not to mention they still retain their unique skin.
No more free fit, still more cost effective than buying from MP is what I'm hoping the direction they are going with this instead of a straightt removal of BPOs. They can also make the BPCs of the BPO tradeable via Player Market. |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
532
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:33:00 -
[47] - Quote
Back when the redeemable items window was limited to (I think) 20 items and people (myself included) began losing items that were being issued for participating in events I straight away assigned all my items to my main character so they had room to give me my stuff.
This combined with the fact that second and third character slots are rendered redundant by the free2play and the free PSN account and the passive sp gain restriction to 1 character making it not worth creating a second character, but instead creating a second PSN account.
And the fact that the Merc pack was the most economical method of buying boosters over the straight AUR packs, since you got a 30 day booster and enough AUR to buy (I think it was) 5 weeks of further boosters.
Leaves us with a situation where I (and I'm sure many others) have multiples of Exiles, Toxins, Skinweave sets, Dragonflies, I know people have multiple MAG sets from stocking up on boosters during that weekend and I don't doubt the list goes on with other 'event prize / Merc Pack bundle' BPOs.
If these aren't tradeable or at the VERY least donateable to corp hangers for new player recruites to make use of.
That's all related to them working in their current state, which CCP have said isn't good for the game, so all this about locking them to characters is the wrong topic to be discussed ... BPOs are blueprint originals ... a blueprint is a set of instructions that tell you how to make something ... it is not a box set of build your own IKEA bookshelf, there are no panels, no shelves, no stupid little jointing screws and no glue (ohh wait IKEA doesn't provide glue ... maybe their stuff would last more than 6 months if they did, but I digress).
Lt Royal made the only valid point in this thread, BPOs should be used with materials to install a manufacture job in your NPC station (as they do in Eve) ... you find or buy the materials off the market ... an NPC haulage corp can move them to your station at a small cost if you have no Eve access ... and you install the job, come back in 17 hours 24 minutes and 51 seconds and hey presto you have a batch of 100 Exiles for the low low cost of a few hundred isks worth of materials that you can use or sell on the market to others for a profit.
By the way I didn't vote since I don't contribute to like farms ... I only vote in official CCP voting threads when they want a consensus ... Lt Royal got my like for having the RIGHT idea.
PS. I will post this in the other thread also, before you ask. |
Soraya Xel
New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men.
683
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:34:00 -
[48] - Quote
MassiveNine wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:My point, Maken, is that just because players want it, even overwhelmingly want it, doesn't mean it's actually a good idea. If selling/trading BPO's is bad, why does it work so well in EVE?
Because BPO's in EVE are not even remotely similar in any fashion to BPO's in DUST?
Everything in EVE costs actual resources to create. A ship BPO doesn't mean you have infinite ships. It means you can create infinite ships with that BPO, for a resource cost, at a production facility, over a duration of production time. And those BPOs can be optimized to reduce resource cost, construction time, etc. But each ship costs resources to construct, and time to construct it. BPC's in EVE, meanwhile, let you build only a select number of things.
The problem with DUST BPO's, is they cost nothing to use. There is no cost of materials, it just spawns you items on the field.
This huge dissimilarity indicates why saying "It works in EVE!" is about as good of an argument as "Bananas are fruit!" Because if BPOs in EVE are bananas, than BPOs in DUST are the color three. There's simply no comparison there. |
A'Real Fury
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
399
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:38:00 -
[49] - Quote
I do not mind them being locked to my account so long as CCP does not change or restrict how I currently use them I.e. nothing changes. |
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
1219
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:41:00 -
[50] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:MassiveNine wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:My point, Maken, is that just because players want it, even overwhelmingly want it, doesn't mean it's actually a good idea. If selling/trading BPO's is bad, why does it work so well in EVE? Because BPO's in EVE are not even remotely similar in any fashion to BPO's in DUST? Everything in EVE costs actual resources to create. A ship BPO doesn't mean you have infinite ships. It means you can create infinite ships with that BPO, for a resource cost, at a production facility, over a duration of production time. And those BPOs can be optimized to reduce resource cost, construction time, etc. But each ship costs resources to construct, and time to construct it. BPC's in EVE, meanwhile, let you build only a select number of things. The problem with DUST BPO's, is they cost nothing to use. There is no cost of materials, it just spawns you items on the field. This huge dissimilarity indicates why saying "It works in EVE!" is about as good of an argument as "Bananas are fruit!" Because if BPOs in EVE are bananas, than BPOs in DUST are the color three. There's simply no comparison there. I'd be fine with having to fit the bill to create my BPO suits. Beck, once that happens we can have that whole EVE guys sending us pre made suits or material. The player market would grow and maybe we would be able to offer something to EVE. Maybe even CCP will start making more BPOs.
Capture a production facility and make products cheaper.
Capture a warehouse and seize all the materials inside.
Let these bonuses extent to players in EVE and they will finally have a reason to deal with us dusties.
Also, let us salvage material from the battefield. |
|
Soraya Xel
New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men.
683
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:50:00 -
[51] - Quote
Cody: That's all coming. Soon(TM). |
Aran Abbas
Goonfeet Top Men.
291
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:19:00 -
[52] - Quote
CCP Mintchip wrote:Hey! Thanks for this post. I do want to make clear that we are very aware and are at attention about this issue. This is something that we have been processing for a while and want to ultimately make a decision that is best for the game and you; the players! Please leave your feedback here! Voting is great, but articulated feedback is extremely appreciated! Thank you!
The problem with voting is that you learn what the majority of people want and then when you go and completely ignore the result it's obvious and you look bad. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4604
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:27:00 -
[53] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:Back when the redeemable items window was limited to (I think) 20 items and people (myself included) began losing items that were being issued for participating in events I straight away assigned all my items to my main character so they had room to give me my stuff.
This combined with the fact that second and third character slots are rendered redundant by the free2play and the free PSN account and the passive sp gain restriction to 1 character making it not worth creating a second character, but instead creating a second PSN account.
And the fact that the Merc pack was the most economical method of buying boosters over the straight AUR packs, since you got a 30 day booster and enough AUR to buy (I think it was) 5 weeks of further boosters.
Leaves us with a situation where I (and I'm sure many others) have multiples of Exiles, Toxins, Skinweave sets, Dragonflies, I know people have multiple MAG sets from stocking up on boosters during that weekend and I don't doubt the list goes on with other 'event prize / Merc Pack bundle' BPOs.
If these aren't tradeable or at the VERY least donateable to corp hangers for new player recruites to make use of.
That's all related to them working in their current state, which CCP have said isn't good for the game, so all this about locking them to characters is the wrong topic to be discussed ... BPOs are blueprint originals ... a blueprint is a set of instructions that tell you how to make something ... it is not a box set of build your own IKEA bookshelf, there are no panels, no shelves, no stupid little jointing screws and no glue (ohh wait IKEA doesn't provide glue ... maybe their stuff would last more than 6 months if they did, but I digress).
Lt Royal made the only valid point in this thread, BPOs should be used with materials to install a manufacture job in your NPC station (as they do in Eve) ... you find or buy the materials off the market ... an NPC haulage corp can move them to your station at a small cost if you have no Eve access ... and you install the job, come back in 17 hours 24 minutes and 51 seconds and hey presto you have a batch of 100 Exiles for the low low cost of a few hundred isks worth of materials that you can use or sell on the market to others for a profit.
By the way I didn't vote since I don't contribute to like farms ... I only vote in official CCP voting threads when they want a consensus ... Lt Royal got my like for having the RIGHT idea.
PS. I will post this in the other thread also, before you ask.
I see the point that you're making. I'm actually all for making the BPOs require some kind of material for production just like Eve Online BPOs, which means anyone who has them will be in a position of influence since the BPOs have unlimited runs compared to the copies and since there will be no more BPOs like them in the market. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4608
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:29:00 -
[54] - Quote
Aran Abbas wrote:CCP Mintchip wrote:Hey! Thanks for this post. I do want to make clear that we are very aware and are at attention about this issue. This is something that we have been processing for a while and want to ultimately make a decision that is best for the game and you; the players! Please leave your feedback here! Voting is great, but articulated feedback is extremely appreciated! Thank you! The problem with voting is that you learn what the majority of people want and then when you go and completely ignore the result it's obvious and you look bad.
On the other hand, constructive feedback can actually provide much more insight into the minds of the players compared to votes. However, it's nice to have both constructive feedback and tallied votes at the same time so that one can see the bigger picture. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4608
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:32:00 -
[55] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Cody Sietz wrote:I just feel like when I asked for a refund for my BPO suits...they should have given it to me...before I speced into them just so I could get some use out of them. If you were around back then during the transition from closed beta to open beta, you would know why CCP had to NOT give the AURUM refund (except for UVTs and Boosters). A few elite players would have had tons of AURUM in their wallets magically appear without spending more cash. I was, and a few people I know got refunds. They sent in help tickets and CCP refunded their Aur. I did the same but CCP said no. So I speced Into scout.
You probably missed a deadline or something. I don't know. |
Kazeno Rannaa
BIG BAD W0LVES
260
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:35:00 -
[56] - Quote
Thanks again Maken Tosch for doing this for the rest of us. |
Aqua-Regia
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
449
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:36:00 -
[57] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:========================VOTE===========================
OFFICIAL VOTE #1 = In favor of letting players freely trade their BPOs with other players once the secondary market arrives.
I vote on this no like for you |
Aqua-Regia
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
449
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:38:00 -
[58] - Quote
Daemon Shotgun BPO Anyone! |
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
1219
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:38:00 -
[59] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Cody Sietz wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Cody Sietz wrote:I just feel like when I asked for a refund for my BPO suits...they should have given it to me...before I speced into them just so I could get some use out of them. If you were around back then during the transition from closed beta to open beta, you would know why CCP had to NOT give the AURUM refund (except for UVTs and Boosters). A few elite players would have had tons of AURUM in their wallets magically appear without spending more cash. I was, and a few people I know got refunds. They sent in help tickets and CCP refunded their Aur. I did the same but CCP said no. So I speced Into scout. You probably missed a deadline or something. I don't know. nope, a old Tritan bud sent in his ticket same time as me and sure enough he got the refund I didn't.
it worked out well in the end since I know have proto racial scout suit, but I'm still stuck with a raven Caldari Assault suit and a Minmatar Logi I will never use since I'm purely Gallente speced.
|
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
532
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:39:00 -
[60] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:I see the point that you're making. I'm actually all for making the BPOs require some kind of material for production just like Eve Online BPOs, which means anyone who has them will be in a position of influence since the BPOs have unlimited runs compared to the copies and since there will be no more BPOs like them in the market. Yeah ... all this talk of buybacks n locking to character is just wrong ... simply leave them alone ... we don't have an economy to speak of anything 'being bad for', when we do why lock BPOs from sale if the intention is to make them manufacturable in the future ... people won't sell them when they realise they'll have an advantage in the industry market in future, unless they need an isk injection of a few hundred million.
These BPOs will be like the T2 BPOs of Eve ... highly sought after for their reduced manufacture costs and increased profit in industry. I completely agree with cutting their availability now they are plentyful, but in years to come when we have markets and industry and a sizeable playerbase they will be rare and sought after.
Edit : maybe with production facilities giving reduced material costs etc. they could be lost if the planet is taken, or there'd be a 25% chance to drop for the captors. |
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4617
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:50:00 -
[61] - Quote
Aqua-Regia wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:========================VOTE===========================
OFFICIAL VOTE #1 = In favor of letting players freely trade their BPOs with other players once the secondary market arrives. I vote on this no like for you
Again, I don't care about the likes on a personal level. Besides, I already got a ton of likes. What difference will a few extra likes make for me as an individual? None.
Some would usually go with typing in their support rather than clicking a "like" button, but the "like" system is the easiest and more manageable way of tallying votes without having to tediously count yes/no votes manually. Can you imagine have to count hundreds of votes in a single threadnaught? It's no fun.
With "likes", you can see the results immediately.
By the way, if you don't click like, your vote won't count. I appreciate your effort in voting, but your vote needs to be tallied effectively. |
Foo Fighting
the unholy legion of darkstar DARKSTAR ARMY
15
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:50:00 -
[62] - Quote
All BPOs need to be either: - fully tradeable - refunded for CASH, not AUR not ISK but cash
It's one thing with the suits from bundles or prizes but the modules we own were bought with cash. Having a promotional campaign on BPOs 1 week before all this crap kicked off is naive at best and underhand regardless.
BPOs are a way to convert real money into isk (as are boosters) - they've had the money under the point of sale slogan "Blueprints are not consumable and will never run out".
Dust is a " long game" STOP MOVING THE GOALPOSTS (Grrr)
Too emotional : didn't read - option 1 |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4617
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:52:00 -
[63] - Quote
Foo Fighting wrote:All BPOs need to be either: - fully tradeable - refunded for CASH, not AUR not ISK but cash
It's one thing with the suits from bundles or prizes but the modules we own were bought with cash. Having a promotional campaign on BPOs 1 week before all this crap kicked off is naive at best and underhand regardless.
BPOs are a way to convert real money into isk (as are boosters) - they've had the money under the point of sale slogan "Blueprints are not consumable and will never run out".
Dust is a " long game" STOP MOVING THE GOALPOSTS (Grrr)
Too emotional : didn't read - option 1
You need to click the like button of the option of your choice for you vote to count. This way, votes can be tallied effectively. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4617
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:55:00 -
[64] - Quote
===========REMINDER=============
I really don't care which vote you people go for so long as you vote. Whichever vote you like, I will respect it all the way. And whatever the conclusion of the vote may be, I will respect it as well even if it's not what I like.
I'm trying to be unbiased over here in order to maintain this thread in an orderly fashion. Since I'm pseudo-moderating this thread on my own, I am not counting my own vote. |
Foo Fighting
the unholy legion of darkstar DARKSTAR ARMY
15
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:59:00 -
[65] - Quote
I did but just fancied a rant while my headset charges :-P |
Kain Spero
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
2134
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 21:15:00 -
[66] - Quote
I would say a middle ground to these two positions would be to allow a single transfer of the BPOs and then have them locked. Another option may be to unassign the BPOs so they can at least be spread out amongst a players alts on that PSN. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4621
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 21:17:00 -
[67] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:I would say a middle ground to these two positions would be to allow a single transfer of the BPOs and then have them locked. Another option may be to unassign the BPOs so they can at least be spread out amongst a players alts on that PSN.
Is there any way you can get CCP Cmdr Wang to start another CCP-sanctioned vote? I miss those days. |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
532
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 21:23:00 -
[68] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:I would say a middle ground to these two positions would be to allow a single transfer of the BPOs and then have them locked. Another option may be to unassign the BPOs so they can at least be spread out amongst a players alts on that PSN. As I said ... alts on the same PSN account are worthless given the free2play, free PSN accounts and single character passive sp gain.
Why would you create an alt when you can have an alt account with it's own passive gain ?
Though I understand you're trying to find a middle ground, making them unassigned would be worthless in most cases.
ALL we need is a confirmation from CCP that these will still be valuable in the future in a manufacturing role, even if they are modified in the short term to require a small (much lower than equivalent) isk cost per use. I f we know they will eventually become the Eve T2 BPO equivalents for DUST, we'll be happy with the modification. |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
532
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 21:24:00 -
[69] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Kain Spero wrote:I would say a middle ground to these two positions would be to allow a single transfer of the BPOs and then have them locked. Another option may be to unassign the BPOs so they can at least be spread out amongst a players alts on that PSN. Is there any way you can get CCP Cmdr Wang to start another CCP-sanctioned vote? I miss those days. That I'll give you a like for ! |
Yelhsa Jin-Mao
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
53
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 21:25:00 -
[70] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:I would say a middle ground to these two positions would be to allow a single transfer of the BPOs and then have them locked. Another option may be to unassign the BPOs so they can at least be spread out amongst a players alts on that PSN. Single trading on assets doesn't strike me as a free player market model. If people don't like BPOs that there opinion, but to limitwhat others can do with their own assets because of someone else' s personal preferences, especially when someone has had to pay real money for that asset, is unfair. People should be able to trade BPOs for aurmn only, not ISK, that's a balanced medium. |
|
True Adamance
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
3451
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 21:26:00 -
[71] - Quote
BPO's need to be produced with consumption of materials like they are EVE side. |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
532
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 21:31:00 -
[72] - Quote
Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote:Kain Spero wrote:I would say a middle ground to these two positions would be to allow a single transfer of the BPOs and then have them locked. Another option may be to unassign the BPOs so they can at least be spread out amongst a players alts on that PSN. Single trading on assets doesn't strike me as a free player market model. If people don't like BPOs that there opinion, but to limitwhat others can do with their own assets because of someone else' s personal preferences, especially when someone has had to pay real money for that asset, is unfair. People should be able to trade BPOs for aurmn only, not ISK, that's a balanced medium. You can't trade items for AUR in Eve ... and you won't in DUST either ... that would drastically cut the revenue from AUR.
The only exception in Eve is PLEX which can be converted to AUR, but that isn't technically an ingame item, it's in a grey area where it can be traded ingame for isk, but is still a real money currency that you can use to pay your subscription or convert into AUR to buy ingame vanity items etc.
Edit : PLEX is "THE MOST VERSATILE ITEM IN ONLINE GAMING" (sry caps quoted) ... I don't doubt it will eventually come to DUST where you might be able to pay for character transfers and sell for isk with the integrated Eve market, or use to convert into AUR etc. etc. |
Rowdy Railgunner
TRUE TEA BAGGERS EoN.
75
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 21:36:00 -
[73] - Quote
I find it funny that I hear people talking and make a sarcastic troll post about what is being discussed and people go ape. Now that there is a confirmed DEV post about it so many people are changing their tune.
I voted to not have them locked BTW. I don't feel that any change should come to BPOs, because unlike what everyone in my other post thinks, I actually have a great bit of them and would rather that they are not changed and or locked to my character because I would like to get rid of a few doubles. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4630
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 21:46:00 -
[74] - Quote
Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote:Kain Spero wrote:I would say a middle ground to these two positions would be to allow a single transfer of the BPOs and then have them locked. Another option may be to unassign the BPOs so they can at least be spread out amongst a players alts on that PSN. Single trading on assets doesn't strike me as a free player market model. If people don't like BPOs that there opinion, but to limitwhat others can do with their own assets because of someone else' s personal preferences, especially when someone has had to pay real money for that asset, is unfair. People should be able to trade BPOs for aurmn only, not ISK, that's a balanced medium.
Actually, BPOs for ISK is a balanced medium.
Take a look at the PLEX market in Eve Online. Just like the BPOs, PLEX requires real-world cash to obtain. PLEX is then either converted to AURUM for vanity items or sold to another player for ISK (current market price of 650,000,000 ISK per 30-day PLEX unit). So far the PLEX system is completely balanced.
BPOs in Dust, assuming NO changes to their stats occur, can become a powerful tool especially given the fact that there will be no more BPOs available from any sources other than the players who stockpiled on them earlier. Players who have them will be in a position of power or influence if they somehow become linked to industry such as requiring materials in addition to the BPO in order to produce an item from it. Not that it's a bad or anything. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4635
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 22:12:00 -
[75] - Quote
Current Vote as right now at the time of this reply:
#1 - 68 votes #2 - 14 votes
Again, this thread will continue to run for as long as a week if needed to make sure enough people have voted. I know CCP is watching this thread and so are the CPM members. So keep those votes coming, folks. Let your corp mates know about this thread. We need to spread the word as much as possible. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4635
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 22:16:00 -
[76] - Quote
Kazeno Rannaa wrote:Thanks again Maken Tosch for doing this for the rest of us.
No problem. Whatever it takes to get your point across. |
crazy space 1
Unkn0wn Killers
1891
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 22:18:00 -
[77] - Quote
My vote is for the weekly sp rollover system
Wait what were we voting for? |
Egypt Musk
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
30
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 22:21:00 -
[78] - Quote
Egypt Musk wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:I'm actually somewhat worried about this... The guy worked on Battlefield Play4Free and Need for Speed World. We just got rid of murder taxi's, for one, and Battlefield Play4Free was a travesty. Hell, just look at the metacritic score (or better yet play the game) and you'll notice some red flags.
Okay, that might have come off as some rather heavy handed sarcasm but it is curious none the less. Let's be real here, the last thing we need is content that has a measurable impact on the battlefield that you can only obtain by paying money and since EA's answer to solving that over at BF:P4F was to abolish premium content that people paid MONEY for....
... and I know, you can't blame one person for the company's mistakes. But one good apple doesn't make a bunch edible. So, here's to hoping that none of EA's business practices wore off on the guy.
Either way, welcome to the team. We'll for 1 this ^....I hate to say some 0ne told us so about what was going to happen when the new Ep started but they told us so and the CPM's had the nerve to give him grief for it....2ndly after being CCP's nerf project for the last 4 months altering my ability to use or trade my BPO in anyway really seams like it would be the final straw that breaks the camel's back and stops me from playing this game.... I bought the elite pack specifically for the bpo and was going to get the eve collectors edition as well for the same reason but given the current state of affairs at cpp I think I will save the cash and use it on other games. I am currently nearing the 20m sp mark and will be at the 200m isk mark soon enough there is no pay out you could offer me in return for my bpo's that I would be happy with unless its COLD HARD CASH(silver preferred lol) just in case you were wondering and I will be putting in a ticket with CCP and Sony asking for such if they are removed.
Just in case some one missed my post in the actual thread here are my thoughts... and I think its clear what vote i placed |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4650
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 01:21:00 -
[79] - Quote
Bump to keep in front page. |
Aeon Amadi
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
3426
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 02:29:00 -
[80] - Quote
Someone's trying to get Forum Warrior Lvl 5 |
|
KING CHECKMATE
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
1990
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 02:31:00 -
[81] - Quote
========================VOTE===========================
OFFICIAL VOTE #1 = In favor of letting players freely trade their BPOs with other players once the secondary market arrives. |
SirManBoy
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
314
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 02:48:00 -
[82] - Quote
I have spent over $500 supporting Dust 514, including the purchase of around 10 merc packs (I have several copies of the same BPOs as a result), the veteran pack, the elite pack, and my recent pre-order purchase of the EVE Second Decade anniversary collection. Most of my motivation for these purchases was to obtain BPOs, boosters, and AUR (for purchasing more boosters). What more do you want from me, CCP? Shouldn't I be able to use my property however I see fit, including the ability to gift, trade, and sell these items? What are you guys thinking?!
If you really want BPOs removed from the market then it's up to you to offer an open-ended and totally voluntary option for disposing of said BPOs that comes with an attractive perk like free omega boosters. Perhaps you can give us the option of converting BPOs to a large number of sellable BPCs. The boosters would be our reward for helping bring the economy in better balance by converting an unlimited run item into a number of consumable items. However, no BPO should ever be taken away from a player involuntarily. Never ever, CCP! I plan on keeping several of my BPOs forever! |
Yelhsa Jin-Mao
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
56
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 02:48:00 -
[83] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:========================VOTE===========================
OFFICIAL VOTE #1 = In favor of letting players freely trade their BPOs with other players once the secondary market arrives.
Agreed |
Yelhsa Jin-Mao
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
56
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 02:49:00 -
[84] - Quote
SirManBoy wrote:I have spent over $500 supporting Dust 514, including the purchase of around 10 merc packs (I have several copies of the same BPOs as a result), the veteran pack, the elite pack, and my recent pre-order purchase of the EVE Second Decade anniversary collection. Most of my motivation for these purchases was to obtain BPOs, boosters, and AUR (for purchasing more boosters). What more do you want from me, CCP? Shouldn't I be able to use my property however I see fit, including the ability to gift, trade, and sell these items? What are you guys thinking?!
If you really want BPOs removed from the market then it's up to you to offer an open-ended and totally voluntary option for disposing of said BPOs that comes with an attractive perk like free omega boosters. Perhaps you can give us the option of converting BPOs to a large number of sellable BPCs. The boosters would be our reward for helping bring the economy in better balance by converting an unlimited run item into a number of consumable items. However, no BPO should ever be taken away from a player involuntarily. Never ever, CCP! I plan on keeping several of my BPOs forever!
^This |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4657
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 04:49:00 -
[85] - Quote
@KING @Yelhsa
I hope you two remembered to click the like button on one of the two voting options. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4657
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 04:54:00 -
[86] - Quote
SirManBoy wrote:I have spent over $500 supporting Dust 514, including the purchase of around 10 merc packs (I have several copies of the same BPOs as a result), the veteran pack, the elite pack, and my recent pre-order purchase of the EVE Second Decade anniversary collection. Most of my motivation for these purchases was to obtain BPOs, boosters, and AUR (for purchasing more boosters). What more do you want from me, CCP? Shouldn't I be able to use my property however I see fit, including the ability to gift, trade, and sell these items? What are you guys thinking?!
If you really want BPOs removed from the market then it's up to you to offer an open-ended and totally voluntary option for disposing of said BPOs that comes with an attractive perk like free omega boosters. Perhaps you can give us the option of converting BPOs to a large number of sellable BPCs. The boosters would be our reward for helping bring the economy in better balance by converting an unlimited run item into a number of consumable items. However, no BPO should ever be taken away from a player involuntarily. Never ever, CCP! I plan on keeping several of my BPOs forever!
I understand your concerns. This is why I started this public vote. CCP needs to see where we stand as a community. Thankfully seeing the votes tallied in likes gives CCP immediate results. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4664
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 13:17:00 -
[87] - Quote
Bump |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4674
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 17:15:00 -
[88] - Quote
Current Tally at the time of this reply:
Vote #1 = 97 Vote #2 = 15 |
Master Jaraiya
Ultramarine Corp
1184
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 17:22:00 -
[89] - Quote
========================VOTE===========================
OFFICIAL VOTE #1 = In favor of letting players freely trade their BPOs with other players once the secondary market arrives.
|
Bethhy
Ancient Exiles
211
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 17:23:00 -
[90] - Quote
With the amount of active players DUST has and the potential amount they could... The BPO numbers arent that staggering... and should be a commodity traded freely from players...
It will be much like EVE online with tech 2 BPO's that are no longer available to get... They are extremely limited and worth alot.
Most of the players who own the blueprint's still are ISK positive running full proto suit's and have hundreads of millions of isk stocked up...
The value of the BPO's will eventually far exceed what the value of the actual item lost thousands of time.
More of a risk versus reward system when pulling out Better then your BPO suit's would fix this problem much better then screwing over every customer who bought said item's usually specifically for the BPO.
Edit* And yes the consensus of players would think CCP screwed them over if those actions where taken... And that's really PR CCP can't afford right now. |
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4677
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 17:33:00 -
[91] - Quote
Bethhy wrote:With the amount of active players DUST has and the potential amount they could... The BPO numbers arent that staggering... and should be a commodity traded freely from players...
It will be much like EVE online with tech 2 BPO's that are no longer available to get... They are extremely limited and worth alot.
Most of the players who own the blueprint's still are ISK positive running full proto suit's and have hundreads of millions of isk stocked up...
The value of the BPO's will eventually far exceed what the value of the actual item lost thousands of time.
In that case, almost no one who owns the BPOs in Dust will sell them except for the excess. Once the excess becomes evenly distributed throughout the economy, all owners will hold onto their only copy for the rest of their lives because it helps them make more ISK faster.
Tell me, which choice would you pick?
A) Sell the BPO for 500 million ISK a piece.
B) Keep the BPO and rack up to billions of ISK more in savings for the rest of your character's life?
It's a no-brainer. |
Anarchide
Greedy Bastards
1267
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 17:36:00 -
[92] - Quote
========================VOTE===========================
OFFICIAL VOTE #1 = In favor of letting players freely trade their BPOs with other players once the secondary market arrives. |
Bethhy
Ancient Exiles
213
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 17:48:00 -
[93] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Bethhy wrote:With the amount of active players DUST has and the potential amount they could... The BPO numbers arent that staggering... and should be a commodity traded freely from players...
It will be much like EVE online with tech 2 BPO's that are no longer available to get... They are extremely limited and worth alot.
Most of the players who own the blueprint's still are ISK positive running full proto suit's and have hundreads of millions of isk stocked up...
The value of the BPO's will eventually far exceed what the value of the actual item lost thousands of time. In that case, almost no one who owns the BPOs in Dust will sell them except for the excess. Once the excess becomes evenly distributed throughout the economy, all owners will hold onto their only copy for the rest of their lives because it helps them make more ISK faster. Tell me, which choice would you pick? A) Sell the BPO for 500 million ISK a piece. B) Keep the BPO and rack up to billions of ISK more in savings for the rest of your character's life? It's a no-brainer.
Not a lot of players I know even use them... its more a novelty item... Some suit's are usable without skills so they give an automatic benefit worth keeping. (Exception LAV BPO's)
But otherwise free suit's are free suit's... You would have to limit the amount of Militia suit's you would get also to eliminate that idea of running a free suit for profit.
I have been isk positive in Proto since beta.. only reason i needed a BPO was because i couldn't fit a good sidearm.
The BPO's in beta where rewarding... and even competitive.. Now when on even playing ability there is a drastic difference from BPO to proto.. Other then a select group running BPO's, it isn't really worth it.
Why i would sell a majority of them. And the rest would collect dust bearing no relevance to DUST. |
Hellkeizer
The Avutora Complex
164
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 17:50:00 -
[94] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Hellkeizer wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:=======REMINDER===== You need to click the "like" button on the two official replies for your vote to count. ===================== If it's an unofficial vote why bother liking for a vote to count? It will count within the context of this thread. But primarily it's to help grab CCP's attention. It worked before when CCP announced they were making changes to the weekly SP cap way back during the beta days. It should work once more for an issue that is very important to us right now. EDIT: I changed the title of the thread to reduce confusion. Thank you for bring this to my attention. Sure thing and sorry if it seemed snobbish |
First Prophet
Unkn0wn Killers
1308
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 18:16:00 -
[95] - Quote
Nice like farm. |
OZAROW
WarRavens League of Infamy
928
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 19:31:00 -
[96] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:========================VOTE===========================
OFFICIAL VOTE #1 = In favor of letting players freely trade their BPOs with other players once the secondary market arrives. I have 8 of the same things and only need one, nice to give to my other toons an also noobs |
Nirwanda Vaughns
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
119
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 20:16:00 -
[97] - Quote
I have posted my ideas about bpos several times and i think its a good solution to solving both the 'bad for economy' issue and the trading issue.
simply tie in BPOs with the PvE drone infestation mode and allow mercs to build equipment using bpos. we live in stations in new eden. these have factories. if the construction time is calculated correctly then they could allow around 20 dropsuits to be constructed per day per bpo. players receive building materials by completing objectives in drone infestation and can build items they own bpos from by using these items. they can then use these items instead of buying from market, allowing for folk who own bpos to get 'free' suits and equipment or eventually sell them to run enhanced gear and equipment from the market once it opens. i do believe we shoud be able to sell excess bpos as many were led to believe that we should and could be able to sell them once palyer markets open up.
personally i belive this whole bpo debacle is simply down to ccp realizing that a 20kAUR bpo wouldn't fund the game enough compared to players being forced to buy AUR suits and items. if so then honestuy can go a long way. people bought merc packs to help fund the game. if CCP was honest then the playerbase will be loyal. as it stands witht he annoucement that bpos will also be removed from both elite and veteran packs and the feear that we may either lose or not have much use for the bpos we receive then playerbase will refuse to buy the current merc packs. in the games current state i'm simply not willing to risk real life money on a suit and fittings i can lose to a glitch/bad server/some dickhead being an ass exploiting.
its also ben my belief that CCP are intentionally making bad decisions in order to close DUST down while looking the good guys. if they make anannouncement saying "well look guys, we tried but it not working so we're closing down" the playerbase would demand compensation and refunds. whereas is they turn round and say "hey guys, we would love to carry on but due to playerbase count we cant continue to support servers" then folk would be more leanient with them,
with decisoons that CCP are making of late i don't see dust survining long enough to reach its potential and its very difficult fo me to say this as i have always had high hopes for this but i'm losing faith in CCP with their decisions about the future of the game. mainly including non support of ps4. even if it was just a compatible client to let us run dust from psn stone of a ps4. stats show the playerbase has dropped since gta5, i see this dropping further when both battlefield 4 arrive and CoD ghosts. not to mention the amount of people trading ps3's in towards ps4. yes there are 80m ps3's out there but only 100k of them actually play this broke ass game from time to time with a peak of 3000-4000 on cap day. rest of the time its dead. dust is was billed as the future of FPS games. ccps need supposrt the future and let us play on both ps3 and 4. no graphical updates need to happen, just build a damn client that works on ps4 to save your playerbase and stop making decisions that make it look like you want to screw us over all the time |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |