nice work and programming on the new look of the tranquility uprising 1.5 update,i only have one major concern,will this new update stop haccers fom using a "backdoor" into the server systems to do a ddos attack again,after the last attack,my game client had to be reinstalled,as it got corrupted,whe the servers went down.i also don't like the thought of hackers getting and looking up my psn account information.

For the concerns about disconnecting from PC battles I will have a look into allowing players to rejoin a battle if they were already in it and not previously kicked by a director.

I will also have a look into allowing squad members to join a squad already deployed into a PC battle provided the squad leader has the TCO role. This would allow substitutes to be pulled in on short notice without the squad leader leaving.

Some have said that this patch is a convenience and nothing more and CCP should be giving us content instead.

Yes it is a convenience and one that perhaps relatively few will get to use. But if this had been in place a year ago I can tell as a CEO this would've given me more time to play the game rather than administrating my corp. if the corps are easier to run and less work to maintain, more and more players are going to give building their own corp a go.

With the growth of successful and easily maintained corporations comes the growth of Dust and its player base. This is why I consider this a huge leap in the development of the game. Ask any of your CEO's, they're going to to love this. And look what has happened as a side effect of giving us these roles.

The discovery and removal of a coding bottle neck that reduces a 2 minute and 52 second download time for 1300+ members to 5 secs. That's over 3000% increase in speed. How many other bottlenecks will the guys find when they try to do something else that isn't related to new content.

Trust me, when you guys want to have a go at starting your own corps, you will be so thankful for 1.5.

So who will be able to assign these roles? Obviously the CEO can assign all, so does that mean the director can assign them all too, except for adding another director?

Cause if the CEO is the only one allowed to add TCO roles, then that could pose an issue.

Also is the personal director able to kick players, or just accept them?

For the concerns about disconnecting from PC battles I will have a look into allowing players to rejoin a battle if they were already in it and not previously kicked by a director.

I will also have a look into allowing squad members to join a squad already deployed into a PC battle provided the squad leader has the TCO role. This would allow substitutes to be pulled in on short notice without the squad leader leaving.

I'm very weary of the TCO role, not because of what it is or what it does, but what it could mean. I've been part of PC matches where, like clockwork, a player gets black-screened, disconnects, or some other vague mishap that occurs when deploying to the match. In the past, if that player is a member of the corporation; they'll just restart and join in separately. If not, one of the backups (usually from the corp in question) will join separately.

Now, that you have to be a TCO to join a Corp Match, how can mitigation of Deployment Issues be lessened?

For all you CEOs and directors out there today is your lucky day. Today you get to read about the new corporation roles coming in Uprising 1.5. Read on to find out how you too, can delegate duties like any good boss.

Great news, I 'm just wondering when the Dust economy is going to be introduced. I also wanted to know about the New Eden star map expanding, the universe of New Eden is vast, can't wait to see the Star map expand so every corporation can get more involved in Planetary Conquest. New weapon upgrades and accessories like scopes or certain customizations for Dropsuits and vehicles to make your war chest unique from others. I'm excited, CCP can do so many great things with Dust 514. It's exciting to see this game evolve.

I will also have a look into allowing squad members to join a squad already deployed into a PC battle provided the squad leader has the TCO role. This would allow substitutes to be pulled in on short notice without the squad leader leaving.

the ability to share your corporation skills completely (even the current corp building skill) with another corp while remaining in your own. As a 4x skill, each additional level will allow you to share your abilities with another corporation of your choosing, up to a maximum of 5 corporations. This ability to share skills with multiple corporations will allow for a self-marketable player asset that can assist alliances and 'rivals' alike for a chosen retainer fee (or work pro-bono). The trick is this information on corporate interaction is not visible unless obtained via a hacking mini-game or word of mouth. Finding out one of your high executives is consulting with the enemy could make for some very juicy meta-gaming.

what a joke. Having only selected people be able to bring players into PC seems like a crazy idea. I like the idea of having roles. but all members of a corp should be able to join a battle. Not only because of faulty servers that kick people out, but also because the players that do have the role might not be there, or maybe only one. So he will have to back out 3 times to bring in players. It doesnt make sense at all and most likely make things harder then they need to be.

For the concerns about disconnecting from PC battles I will have a look into allowing players to rejoin a battle if they were already in it and not previously kicked by a director.

I will also have a look into allowing squad members to join a squad already deployed into a PC battle provided the squad leader has the TCO role. This would allow substitutes to be pulled in on short notice without the squad leader leaving.

This looks nice. I do think there should be a corp role called "PC merc" or something who is always able to join PC, but can't invite others.

So who will be able to assign these roles? Obviously the CEO can assign all, so does that mean the director can assign them all too, except for adding another director?

Cause if the CEO is the only one allowed to add TCO roles, then that could pose an issue.

Also is the personal director able to kick players, or just accept them?

Will only directors and CEOs change tax rates? Or will accountant be able to do that now too?

Also, not being a director, I'm curious. Can Dust players accept Eve player applications to the corp?

so this guys only task is managing the currency that gos through the corp and its players and he cant set the tax rate? Why even have this guy if he has limmited monetary powers when hes suppose to be doing monetary tasks?

For the concerns about disconnecting from PC battles I will have a look into allowing players to rejoin a battle if they were already in it and not previously kicked by a director.

I will also have a look into allowing squad members to join a squad already deployed into a PC battle provided the squad leader has the TCO role. This would allow substitutes to be pulled in on short notice without the squad leader leaving.

I'm very weary of the TCO role, not because of what it is or what it does, but what it could mean. I've been part of PC matches where, like clockwork, a player gets black-screened, disconnects, or some other vague mishap that occurs when deploying to the match. In the past, if that player is a member of the corporation; they'll just restart and join in separately. If not, one of the backups (usually from the corp in question) will join separately.

Now, that you have to be a TCO to join a Corp Match, how can mitigation of Deployment Issues be lessened?