Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aero Yassavi
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
1211
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 09:28:00 -
[61] - Quote
From what I've seen the CPM only represents themselves as individuals, it just so happens that every now and then their opinions line up with that of the community at large.
Would like to see the CPM actually representing the community full time, but we'll have to wait till we can actually vote for that to happen.
EDIT: I still think they are doing a good job pushing some subjects that are important to us like communication. |
Django Quik
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1223
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 10:01:00 -
[62] - Quote
Doc Noah wrote:No, I rarely see CPM conversing with the forumers on game related issues. Iron Wolf is probably the only one who keeps in contact with us but he doesnt really represent a majority of the community but more as an individual player who sees other people having a problem. Most of the stuff CPM do for CCP is hush hush or very discreet so we dont even know what they do for us.
CPM should be more open with the community and people should react to their tag like we do for CCP devs ( -SoxFour). Thats just my opinion. Sounds like you should read some of the CPM Activity Reports Hans has put up in the Council's Chamber section. They do actually tell us what they've been up to in quite some detail. |
Django Quik
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1223
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 10:22:00 -
[63] - Quote
Lol Buster, this has not turned out the way you thought, hey? You thought you'd get hundreds of people shouting, "No! The CPM doesn't represent s**t!" but what you actually got has been 4 pages and only a handful of people agreeing with you. Will you stop now? Doubt it.
What you should really take from all of this is that we don't need anyone representing us right now. We need someone to make a framework so that we can be represented in the future - that is what the CPM is doing. That is why they're called CPM0 and not CPM1 - they are not a 'real' CPM; they are pre-CPM.
When the CPM is eventually elected, I highly doubt anyone will be running with the thought that they want to spend their entire time trying to figure out how to interact effectively with CCP. I don't think anyone is going to want to be searching around to find out who in CCP to talk to about their electorate's concerns. CPM1 will be wanting to get things done and be able to represent the players effectively - they will not be able to even remotely do this without CPM0 setting up the framework for all this now like they are.
TL:DR - there is no point having representation when there's no way to represent and the people being represented to aren't there/listening. |
Django Quik
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1223
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 10:24:00 -
[64] - Quote
And just to answer the actual OP myself - yes, I think CPM0 represents me because they care about setting up a framework for future CPMs and that is something I greatly care about too. |
Hecarim Van Hohen
Bullet Cluster
104
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 10:38:00 -
[65] - Quote
yes for the CPM represents me |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1617
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 14:54:00 -
[66] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Lol Buster, this has not turned out the way you thought, hey? You thought you'd get hundreds of people shouting, "No! The CPM doesn't represent s**t!" but what you actually got has been 4 pages and only a handful of people agreeing with you. Will you stop now? Doubt it.
What you should really take from all of this is that we don't need anyone representing us right now. We need someone to make a framework so that we can be represented in the future - that is what the CPM is doing. That is why they're called CPM0 and not CPM1 - they are not a 'real' CPM; they are pre-CPM.
When the CPM is eventually elected, I highly doubt anyone will be running with the thought that they want to spend their entire time trying to figure out how to interact effectively with CCP. I don't think anyone is going to want to be searching around to find out who in CCP to talk to about their electorate's concerns. CPM1 will be wanting to get things done and be able to represent the players effectively - they will not be able to even remotely do this without CPM0 setting up the framework for all this now like they are.
TL:DR - there is no point having representation when there's no way to represent and the people being represented to aren't there/listening.
It's not a matter of turning out how I thought. It's a matter of finding out what people think.
I did link this straight from the CPM communication thread, so I expected support for the CPM.
I do also see people saying exactly what I've said, and that is that the CPM should be working on getting an elected version in place.
I guess it's just more important to me than most. No biggie, I'm used to not being supported by the majority, and that isn't a bad thing. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1617
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 14:58:00 -
[67] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Who here thinks the CPM represents them?
Let's get - yes for the CPM represents me, or no for the CPM doesn't represent me.
I'd like to see.
BTW, my vote is no.
Please, elaborate why not. Otherwise, it's just another QQ post by a child.
I've posted elsewhere my concerns.
This isn't a QQ thread at all. I'm asking opinion. I assumed that people would want to know what mine, so I added it. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1618
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:01:00 -
[68] - Quote
Captain-Awesome wrote:The CPM isn't here to represent you no matter who says how many times.
For them to represent you, you are meant to have voted them in, so this thread is pointless.
They are doing an ok job, some more than others but that's to be expected.
As long as they focus more on how to sort the CPM frame work I don't care, although I've not seen any discussion on that and we are nearly a 4 months into it?
This is my thought too. I see CPM members commenting in here. Why is it taking so long to set up elections? |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood
1015
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:01:00 -
[69] - Quote
They seem to be doing a decent enough job concidering the situation.. i dont envy their posision
So yes from me... |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1618
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:04:00 -
[70] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Nope
Im a vehicle guy
LAVs/HAVs and loldropships
I am not represented at all As a non AR user, I feel I get no representation either. |
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
2958
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:05:00 -
[71] - Quote
Depends on the CPM
Wolf, yes Everyone else, no |
Django Quik
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1225
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:31:00 -
[72] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:I do also see people saying exactly what I've said, and that is that the CPM should be working on getting an elected version in place.
I guess it's just more important to me than most. No biggie, I'm used to not being supported by the majority, and that isn't a bad thing. I haven't seen a single person in this thread saying 'exactly what you've said' and no one calling for elections ASAP, so please direct me to anything I've missed here.
I appreciate that you're doing all this in at least a respectful and moderate manner (which is much more approachable than some other posters on these forums) but I think you're in a pretty small minority on this exact matter. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1618
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:36:00 -
[73] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Buster Friently wrote:I do also see people saying exactly what I've said, and that is that the CPM should be working on getting an elected version in place.
I guess it's just more important to me than most. No biggie, I'm used to not being supported by the majority, and that isn't a bad thing. I haven't seen a single person in this thread saying 'exactly what you've said' and no one calling for elections ASAP, so please direct me to anything I've missed here. I appreciate that you're doing all this in at least a respectful and moderate manner (which is much more approachable than some other posters on these forums) but I think you're in a pretty small minority on this exact matter.
See Captain-Awesome's quote. That's pretty much my viewpoint word for word. He's not the first in this thread either.
|
Django Quik
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1225
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:38:00 -
[74] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:See Captain-Awesome's quote. That's pretty much my viewpoint word for word. He's not the first in this thread either.
But he hasn't said anything about needing elections ASAP like you've been advocating. No one agrees with that. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1618
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:39:00 -
[75] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Buster Friently wrote:See Captain-Awesome's quote. That's pretty much my viewpoint word for word. He's not the first in this thread either.
But he hasn't said anything about needing elections ASAP like you've been advocating. No one agrees with that.
My thought is that CPM0's job is to prepare for CPM1. Elections are a part of that. Shaping and balancing the playstyles/gamemodes/weapons of Dust isn't. As such, I think that CPM0's primary focus should be on getting elections in place so a representative body can be in there with CCP doing what needs to be done.
Yes, as soon as possible.
No one agrees that the CPM needs to be an elected body as soon as possible? |
Beren Hurin
The Vanguardians
1067
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:40:00 -
[76] - Quote
Buster Friendly:
Where were you during the initial CPM discussion? IMO, you are just roadblocking any progress by senselessly demanding representation within an incomplete system.
Also, by suggesting that only voting gives proper representation, then, if we were to vote tomorrow within our community of 5000-8000 ish players, then the player based doubled over the next year, would the CPM represent that added player base? Because by your logic, every new player to the game that doesn't get a chance to vote for the CPM is default, not represented by them. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1618
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:42:00 -
[77] - Quote
Beren Hurin wrote:Buster Friendly: Where were you during the initial CPM discussion? IMO, you are just roadblocking any progress by senselessly demanding representation within an incomplete system. Also, by suggesting that only voting gives proper representation, then, if we were to vote tomorrow within our community of 5000-8000 ish players, then the player based doubled over the next year, would the CPM represent that added player base? Because by your logic, every new player to the game that doesn't get a chance to vote for the CPM is default, not represented by them.
This is correct. It is true that the players that weren't allowed to vote aren't represented. That's pretty much the definition of disenfranchisement.
Assuming that we had a nice growth spurt, and I would love that, we might need to do new elections to properly represent the new, much larger, playerbase.
|
Django Quik
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1226
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:43:00 -
[78] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Django Quik wrote:Buster Friently wrote:See Captain-Awesome's quote. That's pretty much my viewpoint word for word. He's not the first in this thread either.
But he hasn't said anything about needing elections ASAP like you've been advocating. No one agrees with that. My thought is that CPM0's job is to prepare for CPM1. Elections are a part of that. Shaping and balancing the playstyles/gamemodes/weapons of Dust isn't. What do CPM0 have to do with elections? CCP will sort out the elections, not the CPM. CPM0 is preparing for CPM1 - anything else is just being done because it happens to be coinciding with their period in office and it needs to be done.
What exactly do you want? It seems like you want elections ASAP - am I wrong? |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1618
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:46:00 -
[79] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Django Quik wrote:Buster Friently wrote:See Captain-Awesome's quote. That's pretty much my viewpoint word for word. He's not the first in this thread either.
But he hasn't said anything about needing elections ASAP like you've been advocating. No one agrees with that. My thought is that CPM0's job is to prepare for CPM1. Elections are a part of that. Shaping and balancing the playstyles/gamemodes/weapons of Dust isn't. What do CPM0 have to do with elections? CCP will sort out the elections, not the CPM. CPM0 is preparing for CPM1 - anything else is just being done because it happens to be coinciding with their period in office and it needs to be done. What exactly do you want? It seems like you want elections ASAP - am I wrong?
What I want, is a CPM that is representative of the players, elected of the players. The whole point of the CPM is to represent the players - they can't do that without having been elected.
It's not just about taking the majority opinion to CCP, it's about representing minority opinions too. With an elected CPM you'd have this because members would be elected based on their ideas, agendas, and plans. We don't have this currently with the unelected CPM.
|
Beren Hurin
The Vanguardians
1067
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:47:00 -
[80] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote: What I want, is a CPM that is representative of the players, elected of the players. The whole point of the CPM is to represent the players - they can't do that without having been elected.
It's not just about taking the majority opinion to CCP, it's about representing minority opinions too. With an elected CPM you'd have this because members would be elected based on their ideas, agendas, and plans. We don't have this currently with the unelected CPM.
Buster you have to answer the question, "Why can't the CPM0 represent you without having been elected?" |
|
Zero Notion
Red Star Jr. EoN.
192
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:59:00 -
[81] - Quote
I don't think representation (from this current CPM) is important nor necessarily part of their job. They're sort of like, to put it loosely, the founding fathers establishing a political system before voting can be arranged.
I am sure that is a very slow and tedious process considering the physical division that exists between they and CCP, despite the digital bridge. In the meantime, they offer to bring concerns from the community forward (does it matter that they're Eve players? They play Dust as well) with the intention of bringing about a better gaming experience for all. Considering that Eve and New Eden are established with a functional economy and Dust is going to be 'intruding' on this delicate balance of alliances, resources and nearly real-world like economics, I think it is important that experienced Eve players should be involved with this transition.
I do, however, believe it might be helpful if a role existed that would be given to a player that wasn't from Eve, has no obligations or anything to gain, who could act as an ambassador between the Dust community and CPM0. I wouldn't think they need to have to sign a NDA (that might complicate what CPM0 would be able to share) but it might help introduce a new way to critically think about the 'process' being developed currently, as well as giving the players on the forums a 'voice'.
Just my two cents. |
Django Quik
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1226
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 16:06:00 -
[82] - Quote
Okay, so let's have an election for a new group of Dust514 player representatives today - they would be entirely representative of the playerbase. This new body has no power, no one at CCP who recognises them or will talk to them about anything. That sounds like just the thing you seem to want. Problem solved. |
Zero Notion
Red Star Jr. EoN.
192
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 16:09:00 -
[83] - Quote
How do you elect in a digital format when it's so easily abused? That's part of the problem that exist with trying to elect anyone right now, I think.
Maybe. |
Deadly Mitauchi
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
169
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 16:21:00 -
[84] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Aye which is why we're getting a meeting with the CSM and CCP pretty soon about the link. I want something solid enough that a major eve powerhouse would try to invade Molden Heath for it thus forcing more regions to open up.
We're eons away from Null warfare. It seems he was talking about the market, not PC other than PC is only important to Eve players. Isn't this what you just said too - you want to make PC more important to Eve players?
I can confirm as of this moment PC is still NOT important to Eve Players. So I damn sure hope they make it important to someone soon be it Eve or Dust Soldiers (hopefully both) so that it will continue to grow and bridge the two games together. |
low genius
the sound of freedom Renegade Alliance
285
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 16:54:00 -
[85] - Quote
no. i'm a pirate, and they're carebears.
vote low genius for some pirate representation on the cpm! |
BursegSardaukar
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
224
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 20:16:00 -
[86] - Quote
yes |
Tek Hound
Death In Xcess Corporation
27
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 21:06:00 -
[87] - Quote
No |
Azri Sarum
BurgezzE.T.F
74
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 21:11:00 -
[88] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote: This is my thought too. I see CPM members commenting in here. Why is it taking so long to set up elections?
I don't think anyone would disagree with wanting to get to the point where we have elected representatives. Its a lot of fun watching it all on the EVE side, and its cool to see voting blocks come together. We will get there, so all we are left with is the timing of the elections.
Right now though, i keep asking myself the question:
"Would elections now be a benefit or a detriment to the game?"
Since CMP0 is struggling to get any form of meaningful back and forth out of CCP, i feel like new elected representatives, who have not yet been able to build up a relationship with CCP, who have not yet been able to prove to CCP their value, would essentially be starting over.
The relationship and trust in EVE between the CSM / CCP is why it is as strong as it is today, not because it represents the players extraordinarily well. EVE devs know they can count on the CSM and so they use it. We absolutely have to get the CPM and CCP working together before we can fix anything, and for that we need CCP to know and trust the CPM.
An election could very well reset the relationship between the CPM and CCP, so I have to think waiting until that link is stronger is the way to proceed. Get CCP to accept the CPM, get them using the CPM, then once we do an election they already know the value, putting our elected representatives in a position where they can do some good, and not forcing them to repeat work that CPM0 is doing. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
7219
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 21:42:00 -
[89] - Quote
Azri Sarum wrote:Buster Friently wrote: This is my thought too. I see CPM members commenting in here. Why is it taking so long to set up elections?
I don't think anyone would disagree with wanting to get to the point where we have elected representatives. Its a lot of fun watching it all on the EVE side, and its cool to see voting blocks come together. We will get there, so all we are left with is the timing of the elections. Right now though, i keep asking myself the question: "Would elections now be a benefit or a detriment to the game?" Since CMP0 is struggling to get any form of meaningful back and forth out of CCP, i feel like new elected representatives, who have not yet been able to build up a relationship with CCP, who have not yet been able to prove to CCP their value, would essentially be starting over. The relationship and trust in EVE between the CSM / CCP is why it is as strong as it is today, not because it represents the players extraordinarily well. EVE devs know they can count on the CSM and so they use it. We absolutely have to get the CPM and CCP working together before we can fix anything, and for that we need CCP to know and trust the CPM. An election could very well reset the relationship between the CPM and CCP, so I have to think waiting until that link is stronger is the way to proceed. Get CCP to accept the CPM, get them using the CPM, then once we do an election they already know the value, putting our elected representatives in a position where they can do some good, and not forcing them to repeat work that CPM0 is doing.
I wonder how much worse off the current CPM would be without Hans though, this isn't his first rodeo and he was a previous CSM member and knows the ropes. Chances are there is a full relation with all fresh seats right now not only would they have to start back at 0 possibly but even be further back behind. I know there are players who feel the CPM isn't doing anything but as I pointed back earlier majority of the CPM victories will be silent and unsung. |
Robert Conway
Concordiat Mercenaries Spaceship Samurai
24
|
Posted - 2013.08.14 06:27:00 -
[90] - Quote
I always thought if I ever responded to your thread I was going to chew you a new butt hole. But as a read and read I grew to at least RESPECT your opinion. Not to say I agree with it, but I do respect it. As I hope you would respect, but not agree with my opinion they are doing their best, which I think is pretty darn good. I would like to ask a question that is purely for enlightenment and not just being a douche.
What if the current CPM was all elected when there was an election and we had all the same people on the CPM that we do now? Would that make them more legitimate to you and respect them as a body of individuals?
Purely just wondering with no bad intent behind it.
With love,
Robert Conway |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |