|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1605
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 04:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Who here thinks the CPM represents them?
Let's get - yes for the CPM represents me, or no for the CPM doesn't represent me.
I'd like to see.
BTW, my vote is no.
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1605
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 04:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Heinz Doofenshertz wrote:CPM0 is not a represntative body, they are creating a framework for the first CPM to work in. Right now they are trying to fix the communication system between the CPM and the Devs, Because if that doesn't work, why spend resources, time, and money electing a CPM if they will not be able to get anything done.
These folks are not trying to represent you, they are trying to get a system in place so others can.
That's what I keep saying, but somehow they keep telling me that they are representing me. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1605
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 04:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:LuckyLuke Wargan wrote:What I'd like to know is how many CPMs actually play Dust on a regular basis, feels to me the majority of them are EVE players, with the mentality that Dust should work exactely like EVE, which has done nothing but make this game a failure so far... Funny thing is the CPM thing is taking a lot of time away from Eve as well. Kain is in the business mogul side of things though most of that is afk profits though. I retired to some quiet corner of high sec and I watch over a lab. Not sure where the others are in Eve. Hans is a Faction Warfare fanatic. So far its been pretty useful background knowledge when dealing with out counterparts when we have to talk about the link with them. At least we're knowledgeable enough to poke them about just anything involving everything involving Eve. I wished I can say the same for our own counterparts in eve playing Dust 514 though... One guy insisted that the "Gallente Medic" among 3 other suits (amarr heavy, minmatar scout, and caldari assault) had to be nerfed first before fixing the link and the entire CPM was like
It's funny too that you couldn't just leave this alone and see what the community had to say without the CPM jumping in. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1605
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 04:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
Heinz Doofenshertz wrote:Don't get me wrong they are also trying to represent the Community the best they can to show why they need better communication. They work insanely hard. I know all of them. They work harder than any of us will ever know, on things we will probably never see. And they do in fact try to represent the community the best they can, but that's not their job. It's not what they were meant to be doing.
I agree with this wholeheartedly.
I tried to say as much, but told I was "silly" for saying that they should be focusing on making elections possible rather than trying to shape Dust. Shaping Dust is, IMHO, what CPM1 should be doing considering they would be elected.
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1605
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 04:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Buster Friently wrote: It's funny too that you couldn't just leave this alone and see what the community had to say without the CPM jumping in.
Honestly it is a broken record majority of the time or worse yet an Echo Chamber.
Is this your opinion of the community's views?
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1605
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 04:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Heinz Doofenshertz wrote:Don't get me wrong they are also trying to represent the Community the best they can to show why they need better communication. They work insanely hard. I know all of them. They work harder than any of us will ever know, on things we will probably never see. And they do in fact try to represent the community the best they can, but that's not their job. It's not what they were meant to be doing. I agree with this wholeheartedly. I tried to say as much, but told I was "silly" for saying that they should be focusing on making elections possible rather than trying to shape Dust. Shaping Dust is, IMHO, what CPM1 should be doing considering they would be elected. Lol Silly you. Shaping the CPM is the primary goal of CPM 0 and every subsequent CPM from now on. Shaping the entire council does NOT stop with CPM0 nor should it. Eve CSM is still being developed to this day and this is probably going to the the second hardest fight to battle for the CPM is to catch up to the CSM where they are in terms of relationship to the community and the developers.
I wrote shaping "Dust" not the CPM. As an unelected body, I fail to see why you should be shaping Dust aside from prepping for CPM1.
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1606
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 04:54:00 -
[7] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Buster Friently wrote:
I wrote shaping "Dust" not the CPM. As an unelected body, I fail to see why you should be shaping Dust aside from prepping for CPM1.
Well there is this one change coming down the pipes. I among all other CPM members are doing our best to prevent it because if it does go through... we're predicting a bunch of pitchforks and torches. CPM raised enough hell that the post explaining the changes has been so far delayed a week. So far still no resolution though so I got my fingers crossed and would be happy to tell you all about it once it's resolution is made public. The most notable change the CPM pushed forward from the community and did get through was the Planetary Conquest changes for '1.3' the re-attacking and successful defense portion. There are bunch of other very small things that have been done because they been tunneled through the CPM I for one would not let these things continue to rot the game when I can poke a dev about it and get something done. CPM are not designers we're just sanity checks.
I might be happy about this if I knew what it was, or if I knew that I had a voice in electing you, such that I might have a little confidence that you spoke for me as well as others here.
For the record, I have never said - anywhere - that I thought you were useless. Just that I thought you were doing the wrong job.
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1607
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 05:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Aye which is why we're getting a meeting with the CSM and CCP pretty soon about the link. I want something solid enough that a major eve powerhouse would try to invade Molden Heath for it thus forcing more regions to open up.
We're eons away from Null warfare.
It seems he was talking about the market, not PC other than PC is only important to Eve players. Isn't this what you just said too - you want to make PC more important to Eve players? |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1617
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 14:54:00 -
[9] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Lol Buster, this has not turned out the way you thought, hey? You thought you'd get hundreds of people shouting, "No! The CPM doesn't represent s**t!" but what you actually got has been 4 pages and only a handful of people agreeing with you. Will you stop now? Doubt it.
What you should really take from all of this is that we don't need anyone representing us right now. We need someone to make a framework so that we can be represented in the future - that is what the CPM is doing. That is why they're called CPM0 and not CPM1 - they are not a 'real' CPM; they are pre-CPM.
When the CPM is eventually elected, I highly doubt anyone will be running with the thought that they want to spend their entire time trying to figure out how to interact effectively with CCP. I don't think anyone is going to want to be searching around to find out who in CCP to talk to about their electorate's concerns. CPM1 will be wanting to get things done and be able to represent the players effectively - they will not be able to even remotely do this without CPM0 setting up the framework for all this now like they are.
TL:DR - there is no point having representation when there's no way to represent and the people being represented to aren't there/listening.
It's not a matter of turning out how I thought. It's a matter of finding out what people think.
I did link this straight from the CPM communication thread, so I expected support for the CPM.
I do also see people saying exactly what I've said, and that is that the CPM should be working on getting an elected version in place.
I guess it's just more important to me than most. No biggie, I'm used to not being supported by the majority, and that isn't a bad thing. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1617
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 14:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Who here thinks the CPM represents them?
Let's get - yes for the CPM represents me, or no for the CPM doesn't represent me.
I'd like to see.
BTW, my vote is no.
Please, elaborate why not. Otherwise, it's just another QQ post by a child.
I've posted elsewhere my concerns.
This isn't a QQ thread at all. I'm asking opinion. I assumed that people would want to know what mine, so I added it. |
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1618
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:01:00 -
[11] - Quote
Captain-Awesome wrote:The CPM isn't here to represent you no matter who says how many times.
For them to represent you, you are meant to have voted them in, so this thread is pointless.
They are doing an ok job, some more than others but that's to be expected.
As long as they focus more on how to sort the CPM frame work I don't care, although I've not seen any discussion on that and we are nearly a 4 months into it?
This is my thought too. I see CPM members commenting in here. Why is it taking so long to set up elections? |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1618
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Nope
Im a vehicle guy
LAVs/HAVs and loldropships
I am not represented at all As a non AR user, I feel I get no representation either. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1618
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:36:00 -
[13] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Buster Friently wrote:I do also see people saying exactly what I've said, and that is that the CPM should be working on getting an elected version in place.
I guess it's just more important to me than most. No biggie, I'm used to not being supported by the majority, and that isn't a bad thing. I haven't seen a single person in this thread saying 'exactly what you've said' and no one calling for elections ASAP, so please direct me to anything I've missed here. I appreciate that you're doing all this in at least a respectful and moderate manner (which is much more approachable than some other posters on these forums) but I think you're in a pretty small minority on this exact matter.
See Captain-Awesome's quote. That's pretty much my viewpoint word for word. He's not the first in this thread either.
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1618
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:39:00 -
[14] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Buster Friently wrote:See Captain-Awesome's quote. That's pretty much my viewpoint word for word. He's not the first in this thread either.
But he hasn't said anything about needing elections ASAP like you've been advocating. No one agrees with that.
My thought is that CPM0's job is to prepare for CPM1. Elections are a part of that. Shaping and balancing the playstyles/gamemodes/weapons of Dust isn't. As such, I think that CPM0's primary focus should be on getting elections in place so a representative body can be in there with CCP doing what needs to be done.
Yes, as soon as possible.
No one agrees that the CPM needs to be an elected body as soon as possible? |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1618
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
Beren Hurin wrote:Buster Friendly: Where were you during the initial CPM discussion? IMO, you are just roadblocking any progress by senselessly demanding representation within an incomplete system. Also, by suggesting that only voting gives proper representation, then, if we were to vote tomorrow within our community of 5000-8000 ish players, then the player based doubled over the next year, would the CPM represent that added player base? Because by your logic, every new player to the game that doesn't get a chance to vote for the CPM is default, not represented by them.
This is correct. It is true that the players that weren't allowed to vote aren't represented. That's pretty much the definition of disenfranchisement.
Assuming that we had a nice growth spurt, and I would love that, we might need to do new elections to properly represent the new, much larger, playerbase.
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1618
|
Posted - 2013.08.13 15:46:00 -
[16] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Django Quik wrote:Buster Friently wrote:See Captain-Awesome's quote. That's pretty much my viewpoint word for word. He's not the first in this thread either.
But he hasn't said anything about needing elections ASAP like you've been advocating. No one agrees with that. My thought is that CPM0's job is to prepare for CPM1. Elections are a part of that. Shaping and balancing the playstyles/gamemodes/weapons of Dust isn't. What do CPM0 have to do with elections? CCP will sort out the elections, not the CPM. CPM0 is preparing for CPM1 - anything else is just being done because it happens to be coinciding with their period in office and it needs to be done. What exactly do you want? It seems like you want elections ASAP - am I wrong?
What I want, is a CPM that is representative of the players, elected of the players. The whole point of the CPM is to represent the players - they can't do that without having been elected.
It's not just about taking the majority opinion to CCP, it's about representing minority opinions too. With an elected CPM you'd have this because members would be elected based on their ideas, agendas, and plans. We don't have this currently with the unelected CPM.
|
|
|
|