| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. Share your favorite Dust montage! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Denak Kalamari wrote: I totally killed a triple rep Madrugar with a militia swarm launcher and locus grenades, while going on a 50 killstreak with a militia submachine gun and rewarding me two orbitals. I even recorded this glorious match with ...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.17 17:19:00
|
162. Share your favorite Dust montage! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Montage wise I've only done 2 tank hunting which I just posted yesterday in an AV vs Tank discussion thread. So forgive the multi post of the same video, but here they are. Pre 1.7 - http://youtu.be/7bh-USAguCA Post 1.8 - http://youtu.be/XJh8Q...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.17 16:57:00
|
163. Shared squad precision should be removed. - in General Discussions [original thread]
BrotherofHavok wrote: ratamaq doc wrote: How about this for the ones stating that this gives the scout a purpose in a squad, why don't you use that neat little scouting tool called an active scanner to light up what your personal passives ar...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.17 15:18:00
|
164. Shared squad precision should be removed. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Denn Maell wrote: ratamaq doc wrote: How about this for the ones stating that this gives the scout a purpose in a squad, why don't you use that neat little scouting tool called an active scanner to light up what your personal passives are pi...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.17 15:17:00
|
165. Share your favorite Dust montage! - in General Discussions [original thread]
KingBabar wrote: Wilhelm Klingspor wrote: Good Lord, A michelin star for the cooking skills, nice vid. EDDIERIO also has some very nice ones Find your favorite and link it here, share it! Edit, + 1 for your sig... Yea he gets a plu...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.17 14:54:00
|
166. Shared squad precision should be removed. - in General Discussions [original thread]
How about this for the ones stating that this gives the scout a purpose in a squad, why don't you use that neat little scouting tool called an active scanner to light up what your personal passives are picking up? You have an extra equipment slot ...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.17 14:46:00
|
167. Do "tankers" realise this? - in General Discussions [original thread]
IR Scifi wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: Galthur wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: I am open to major AV buff once vehicles get the variety back. Also more direct and indirect AV weaponry to get the rock paper scissors, not rock paper nuke. Tw...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.16 20:39:00
|
168. Do "tankers" realise this? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: ratamaq doc wrote: Jack McReady wrote: ratamaq doc wrote: ..snip.. Tanks ARE soloable now. Proof is in this video . If you want to hunt tanks alone, you need to use a combination of AV weapons to do it, you don't...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.16 16:29:00
|
169. Getting Credit for Defending Objectives - in General Discussions [original thread]
Camping an objective cloaked isn't as rewarding as it should be?
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.16 15:06:00
|
170. Do "tankers" realise this? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: ratamaq doc wrote: Fellow AVers, we can take a high ground here. We shouldn't ask for too much more by way of buffing AV or nerfing tanks. Balance is really close. The only things I would like to see is a RoF nerf on the ...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.16 14:32:00
|
171. Do "tankers" realise this? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fellow AVers, we can take a high ground here. We shouldn't ask for too much more by way of buffing AV or nerfing tanks. Balance is really close. The only things I would like to see is a RoF nerf on the blaster coupled with a damage buff to keep th...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.16 04:36:00
|
172. People aren't seeing the whole picture here... (AV vs. Vehicles)... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: Harpyja wrote: Just nerf large blaster damage by about 33% and it's where it's supposed to be: best at AI but also worst at AV. Right now it's best at AI with little loss to AV potential. WTF? There's absolutely no trade-off...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.15 18:26:00
|
173. People aren't seeing the whole picture here... (AV vs. Vehicles)... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I hate tanks, I always have. That is no secret. But balance is almost there. The only thing I think is left is reducing the effectiveness of blasters vs infantry. Other than that, tanks can be killed with either 1 dedicated AV or 2 simi dedicated....
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.15 18:18:00
|
174. "just fit precision mods" - in General Discussions [original thread]
NAV HIV wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Magnus Amadeuss wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Magnus Amadeuss wrote: I wasn't able to get that scanning sharing to show-up in-game, but I suggest everyone who does to submit a bug report/ticket in or...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.15 14:40:00
|
175. "just fit precision mods" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: I wasn't able to get that scanning sharing to show-up in-game, but I suggest everyone who does to submit a bug report/ticket in order to get that fixed. I mean it is plain as day CCP didn't intend to share that, and the...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.15 14:18:00
|
176. "just fit precision mods" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: Yan Darn wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: ratamaq doc wrote: I agree with you on the cloak with the dampener being a problem, but remember it is an active module, that had its active counter nerfed hard prior to...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.15 10:31:00
|
177. "just fit precision mods" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Magnus you almost touched on a missing point here. I agree with you on the cloak with the dampener being a problem, but remember it is an active module, that had its active counter nerfed hard prior to its release. The active scanner should be a h...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.15 02:07:00
|
178. Driveby HMG sentinels - in General Discussions [original thread]
I actually sent an LOL email to one of these guys the other day. He popped out on line harvest on the MCC side of the pipes above A. I managed to get an RE on his LAV before he killed me. I was mad for the 2 seconds it to for him to find and shoot...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.15 00:17:00
|
179. Do "tankers" realise this? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tanks can be solo'd. It takes a lot of skill points and a lot of dedication to do it though. Everything has to go right for the AVer and wrong for the tanker. It's Dropships that **** me off. With tanks, I can avoid them, hunt them, engage them ...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.14 22:46:00
|
180. The Cost Of AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: My missile tank finds it hard to fight back against infantry AV, so I'm forced to retreat. Isn't that good enough for you, for the missile tank at least? No, not even a little bit. I did spend months of SP shoo you away. ...
- by ratamaq doc - at 2014.04.08 20:54:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |