Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
721. Infantry AV is now a full time class of its own. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: The Attorney General wrote: Atiim wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: OP is correct AV players can defo make out a living killing tanks and can do it every game aswell if they really want to, problem is they dont w...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 16:43:00
|
722. Infantry AV is now a full time class of its own. - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: pegasis prime wrote: Atiim wrote: pegasis prime wrote: ok dude you might be beyond help but ill give it a go.... vehicle users did not get a respect we had sp returned from skills that were REMOVED.. Giving av a s...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 16:40:00
|
723. Infantry AV is now a full time class of its own. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: pegasis prime wrote: I put up a thread to discuss the possibilities of an av suit with bonuses generated towards each races av weponary but it was soon forgotten and buried beneath all the QQ nerf tank threads. Kind of like e...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 16:34:00
|
724. Infantry AV is now a full time class of its own. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: pegasis prime wrote: ok dude you might be beyond help but ill give it a go.... vehicle users did not get a respect we had sp returned from skills that were REMOVED.. Giving av a specific suit fr=or each race that will give some...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 16:29:00
|
725. Infantry AV is now a full time class of its own. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Justicar Karnellia wrote: pegasis prime wrote: I put up a thread to discuss the possibilities of an av suit with bonuses generated towards each races av weponary but it was soon forgotten and buried beneath all the ...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 14:24:00
|
726. matchmaking solved - in General Discussions [original thread]
+1 good sir , I like it but would call it Threat levels rather than skill levels ?? maybe
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 14:19:00
|
727. Infantry AV is now a full time class of its own. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I put up a thread to discuss the possibilities of an av suit with bonuses generated towards each races av weponary but it was soon forgotten and buried beneath all the QQ nerf tank threads.
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 12:09:00
|
728. A 70k ISK tank should be as effective as a 70k ISK suit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: pegasis prime wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nah tanks need another ISK reduction Im still paying too much as I said before Takahiro its funny all these guys who werwe adamant that isk should not factor in...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 12:08:00
|
729. A 70k ISK tank should be as effective as a 70k ISK suit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Nah tanks need another ISK reduction Im still paying too much as I said before Takahiro its funny all these guys who werwe adamant that isk should not factor into balance when they are instapoping tanks but when ...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 11:48:00
|
730. Equipment spam and you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Valmorgan Aubaris wrote: 8213 wrote: Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: Yeah. Can we not have all you pc corps ruin what would be otherwise enjoyable FW games with the ridiculous equipment spam -snip-. You just stated the cause and solution in th...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 11:40:00
|
731. Equipment spam and you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Piraten Hovnoret wrote: pegasis prime wrote: Piraten Hovnoret wrote: Strange I almost never lag. You are al just a bunch of scrubs =ƒÿ¦ Al the PC corps do this cuse they understand the inportantse of holding that supply depot on that m...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 11:31:00
|
732. Equipment spam and you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Piraten Hovnoret wrote: Strange I almost never lag. You are al just a bunch of scrubs =ƒÿ¦ Al the PC corps do this cuse they understand the inportantse of holding that supply depot on that map. Puting down rephives, to rep ppl is only a go...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 10:47:00
|
733. Why are true tankers blamed for tank spam - in General Discussions [original thread]
CommanderBolt wrote: The militia double dmg mod railgun is a eye opener for sure! Should we remove ALL dmg mods from the game? Something to think about. Oh and by the way guys the op is saying that the average guy on the forums complains abo...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 03:15:00
|
734. The real problem... - in General Discussions [original thread]
KenKaniff69 wrote: The assault forge gun rips right through a shield tank with only one hardener. By running two hardeners, you can survive a decent number of shots from an assault forge gun and then return after the 45 second cooldown time. Ch...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 03:11:00
|
735. The real problem... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quil Evrything wrote: "the real problem"... is when people post meaningless subject lines in an attempt to get more attention than their topic deserves. and you are ??? oh that's right no one worth paying any attention to. if you have nothi...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 02:54:00
|
736. The real problem... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I originally posted this in feedback and requests for the devs to read , but i thought id leave this here for the rest of the community. There has been allot of crying and complaining regarding unkillable tanks, this I believe is mostly down to t...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 02:46:00
|
737. Infantry AV is now a full time class of its own. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: No I would happily destroy vehicles 24/7 but why do that when militia tanks are better then my proto swarms with prof 4 and three damage mods and cost less. you should probably mention that its mlt tanks your talking about a...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.23 00:28:00
|
738. Heavy Machine Guns Are Overpowered - in General Discussions [original thread]
if this thread was written by anyone else id put it down to trolling, but ill pe putting this one down to the ops stupidity.
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.22 22:47:00
|
739. A 70k ISK tank should be as effective as a 70k ISK suit - in General Discussions [original thread]
I do love allot of these price related gripes and groans about vehicles especially from infantry who told tankers for months and months that isk price should not factor into balance
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.22 18:26:00
|
740. How to counter Nyan SANs research faciliy strat - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: pegasis prime wrote: I cant wait until CCP puts a hard cap on equipment deployment , ooohh the QQ will be marvellous . wwaaaaaaa how can me and five of my squad mates be proper logis if we cant drop 52 nano hives and 64 ...
- by pegasis prime - at 2013.12.22 13:39:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |