| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
861. What race has the sexiest starships? - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: i'm sorry but the avatar , lets not fool ourselves here, its basically a giant space ****, so many style points lost. But the topic is which race has the sexiest starship. Wouldn't a giant space **** fit the bill?
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.28 00:33:00
|
862. What race has the sexiest starships? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sisters of EVE ships. They're very nice to look at. http://web.ccpgamescdn.com/eveonlineassets/expansion/rbc/soe-cruiser-big.jpg http://web.ccpgamescdn.com/eveonlineassets/expansion/rbc/soe-frigate-big.jpg
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.28 00:12:00
|
863. Invisible dropsuits - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It's not unfair. That player just knew how to counter scanners.
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.27 23:25:00
|
864. Swarm range is ok, guys - in General Discussions [original thread]
Your photo is terrible because the point of reference is blocked by terrain. [-_-] Redo?
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.27 23:04:00
|
865. Nerfed Proto Swarm Launchers are WORSE than current Standard Swarm Launchers. - in General Discussions [original thread]
mmm... The damage is per missile fired, which increases the higher up in tier you go. Don't understand the range nerf but then again it might not be that bad; have to wait and see. If it was over nerfed, CCP can always redo it at the cost of more...
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.27 22:58:00
|
866. More stuff from the database... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Auto-detonator would be fine if it didn't detonate immediately. But instead takes a few seconds after death to detonate and make a loud beeping noise. Smoke(miasma) grenades will be the bane of me. Fun but highly annoying to my personal play style.
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.27 11:16:00
|
867. Some Things I Question about the Vehicle "Rebalancing" - in General Discussions [original thread]
It would interesting if LAVs could restock a tanks ammo supply.
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.27 08:03:00
|
868. CCP guess what - in General Discussions [original thread]
Start making connections. Honestly rather see more EVE & Dust_514 interaction, even if it means corps exclusive to one of the 2 games miss out.
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.27 07:47:00
|
869. Meta Gaming 101 - Dust University (30/10/2013) - in General Discussions [original thread]
can we get this on youtube?
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.27 05:54:00
|
870. Tankers will rise once again - in General Discussions [original thread]
Honestly, good tankers will continue to do well and crap tankers will continue to suck and cry on the forums.
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.26 11:15:00
|
871. Announcement:Weapon stats! - in General Discussions [original thread]
This is just speculation but, rail rifle's slow rate of fire and charge time make it unideal in CQC. It should be interesting to see how the 2 new rifles will impact the game.
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.26 07:40:00
|
872. Announcement:Weapon stats! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Foundation Seldon wrote: Are the people complaining about lack of Forge changes incapable of reading? CCP Wolfman wrote: Lastly, as part of the ongoing vehicle work I can confirm we are also making changes to AV. So far weGÇÖve touched the...
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.26 03:55:00
|
873. Announcement:Statement on BPO Removal - in General Discussions [original thread]
OZAROW wrote: Sunara Detra wrote: OZAROW wrote: Sunara Detra wrote: Ok whats a BPO? Blue print original. ahhh ok thank you If we're able to sell look me up, I have 8 scouts, 8 toxins, 3 cars, 2 assault suits an rifles I call ...
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.26 03:45:00
|
874. Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 3 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why was this deserving of a new thread when you could have simply posted in the original thread? -_-
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.26 03:28:00
|
875. Tank 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: (tanks are big and slow targets, while infantry is small and agile). Do we play the same game? The slowest tank is faster than the fastest infantry.
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.26 02:52:00
|
876. Tank 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Can you QQ some more please? Tears are worth more than gold! You missed the obvious sarcasm.
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.26 01:13:00
|
877. Tank 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tanks with substantial SP invested into them are difficult to destroy; it's just that too many pilots are greedy and will sit there and take all the AV thrown at it. Conversely tanks with little to no SP invested in them are too easy to destroy a...
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.26 00:28:00
|
878. Oh would you look at that? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Coleman Gray wrote: CCP are balancing AV, almost makes me wanna stick with vehicles. You thought they wouldn't after they told you they would?
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.25 07:32:00
|
879. How to fix FG's dominating PC: One easy step! - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Put fences on roofs. BAM. Problem solved. The problem isn't really a forge gun problem so much as it is a map design problem. There needs to be more options to reaching high places besides using a drop ship. CCP seems to be h...
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.25 06:06:00
|
880. I LOVE YOU ALL - in General Discussions [original thread]
XxWarlordxX97 wrote: Draxus Prime wrote: *hug* HMG say no Your too fat and slow to refuse our free "hugs". One way or another, I'm gonna find ya' I'm gonna get ya', get ya', get ya', get ya'
- by medomai grey - at 2013.10.25 02:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |