OP you are in a abuse relationship with the entire forum, please stop making threads because people(Me) will come here and beat you over the head with a logic bat until you learn.

You don't seem to have enough likes so heres one

No you ruined my 666 likes.

My 420, 666, and 1337 likes got ruined so I'm just spreading the love

3 AV to kill a tank? ONE TANK?

6 people for 2 Tanks ?
9 people for 3 tanks?
12 people for 4 tanks?
15 people for 5 tanks?

That adds up quickly. In fact I while back I actually made a thread about this.

That's not good reasoning.

Why should you be able to solo infantry? Because you are in a tank?

You should be weak and succeptable to AV because it's AV. THAT'S IT DOING IT'S JOB!

You clearly want tanks to be OP and without any AV resistance whatsoever. Good attempt at trying to "balance " this issue

you'll get over it when you see 1000 get close.

ahem....:

3 people for one tank.

3 people take down a single tank.
the same 3 people take down 2 more tanks.
the same 3 people take down 4 more tanks.
the same 3 people take down a full squad of tanks.

honestly the only way youd need more than 3 people dealing with us is if your too damn ******** to go after more than one target. when youv destroyed one already... are you too tired to run after you kill one of us off that you need another 3 people to take your place?

your making it seem like AV are too damn stupid to destroy multiple targets (which I can say for 95% of the community, that's true).

You totally ambushed my tank last night after I killed yours, if it weren't for your swarm buddy I just might have escaped, but you just kind of ninja'd up behind me at ramming speed

I think my work here is done.

pretty much...

youv once again shown how incredibly ignorant and stupid you are.

Apparently you dont remember the Surya and Sagaris in Chromo. The current tanks are tissue paper compared to those.

They were only tanky because people didn't use any AV but AV grenades and militia swarms.

Nah, i've stated my points, and clearly everyone favors tanks

So, instead of trying to keep things balanced, I'm gonna just wait for tanks to be OP.

Then i'll just use my tank and still do good.

The situation is kind of a mix between a losing battle, and a win/win situation.

On one hand, you want tanks to be OP, and I don't.

But on the other hand, I also use tanks; so if they become OP, I won't be any less sad.

So i'll just let the community live with this decision, and when this becomes Tank 514, and HAVs are the next Flaylock Pistol, i'll just be here to say:

so your saying that if tanks are finally able to survive something and be a viable class, they will become OP?

biggest scrub ever..

tanks are one of the biggest jokes in the game, FACT.

by the way things are, nobody new want to go into tanks because its **** and nearly dead, only those of us that know what to do are able to do anything, and there are maybe 10 of us left (your no tanker).

if tanks are finally able to survive, they will be a viable class for once... get that through your biased cod scrub head

I had proto swarms back then as well and those tanks were a pain to try to take out. Felt like a real accomplishment to take one out. The only way for tankers to survive now is through speed to get out of the line of fire if they start getting hit. I rarely use my swarms anymore because its just not fair. I have a harder time taking out a LLAV than I do a Maddy.

You've yet to prove me wrong, you say that I'm no tanker, and yet you still have yet to prove me wrong about being a tanker.

A biased COD scrub? LOL I've only played COD once, and then proceeded to have my friend pay for the pizza as payback for making me play that boring, repetitive POS game.

And again you aren't baised? YOU ARE THE MOST BIASED PERSON I'VE MET ON THE FORUMS!

Tanks with substantial SP invested into them are difficult to destroy; it's just that too many pilots are greedy and will sit there and take all the AV thrown at it.

Conversely tanks with little to no SP invested in them are too easy to destroy and its virtually impossible to win any confrontation with a tank fitted with higher tier equipment.

Fortunately, CCP's vehicle overhaul seems to addresses the real imbalances regarding vehicles and not the QQ of shoddy forum tankers that Atiim pokes with a stick.

Nah, i've stated my points, and clearly everyone favors tanks

So, instead of trying to keep things balanced, I'm gonna just wait for tanks to be OP.

Then i'll just use my tank and still do good.

The situation is kind of a mix between a losing battle, and a win/win situation.

On one hand, you want tanks to be OP, and I don't.

But on the other hand, I also use tanks; so if they become OP, I won't be any less sad.

So i'll just let the community live with this decision, and when this becomes Tank 514, and HAVs are the next Flaylock Pistol, i'll just be here to say:

you have yet to say why tanks shouldn't be able to survive anything other than the stupid "well I get killed by militia guys all the time, and I make back my isk in one match", there are no reasons tanks shouldn't be buffed and there are many, many reasons tanks shouldn't be ignored.

also, you have yet to give any proof that you are a tanker.

Atiim, the reason tanks won't be OP as much as you whine about is this.

1. You can hide from tanks in the interiors of the outposts

2. You can get a militia rail tank and snipe them with the same effectiveness as before.

AV will just become less if a hard counter like it is now, and more of a deterrent as you wait for an allied AV tank to kill it for you

The only reason a team would lose against a tank would because they sacrifice AI room for AV. Where they could just sacrifice one to scare em off.

Yeah Yea YEAH!

Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me!

The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but tanks!

We should have tanks that have 25000 shields and 150000 armor, just like a CRU.

And we should solo infantry and go 55/0, but infantry shouldn't solo us.

AV scrubs should have to use 3 people to take out one tank, regardless of how many tanks are on the field at the same time, and after all, thier SMG should be able to save them from infantry with primary weapons, or we could just make them run commando suits!

TANKS! TANKS! TANKS!

Make them god please! Because that is clearly what they want

---

Just thought I'd compile the wishes of tankers into one thread.

Can you QQ some more please? Tears are worth more than gold!

1.) Yeah and what about outdoor maps? Should I sit there and pray that the tank doesn't do anything?

2.) I shouldn't have to use a MLT railgun to deal with a tank

And so yet again we have another person who believes that the best counter to a tank should be a tank? You clearly don't know what AV stands for, as it means ANTI-VEHICLE, not Temporary watergun untill another tank comes, and once again not everyone has a Tank.

The best, strongest, and most absolute counter to Vehicles should be ANTI-VEHICLE. AV was designed to do just that, and when did CCP say that the best counter to a Tank should be a Tank?

The fact that you believe that AV should just be "support waterguns" for tankers to use while in combat is ludicrous. It doesn't even follow the common rock paper scissors design.

If the best counter to a tank is a tank then that would require everyone to have a tank to be effective, and will lead to this game becoming TANK 514, (hence the OP)