| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
841. Soooo my dust account has been banned??? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Levithunder wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Levithunder wrote: Joseph Ridgeson wrote: That... terrifies me greatly. Please post what was the cause of the ban so I can be certain it doesn't happen to me. I play the game straight and fair but...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.13 20:25:00
|
842. why does this game have less players online than a 1995 fps? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Drud Green wrote: Evetybody keeps sayong "carbon was too complex for the ps3", shouldn't you really be saying "ps3 is too complex for ccp" ? this one is truly not understanding the world around him.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.13 20:23:00
|
843. Cease Chinese Production - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rynoceros wrote: This is a Topic to discuss and address the REAL Number 1 glaring issue with Dust514; CCP Shanghai. (And, No, I'm not a racist - so you can abandon whatever lame Hit|er/Holocaust argument you're already concocting in your littl...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.13 20:10:00
|
844. why does this game have less players online than a 1995 fps? - in General Discussions [original thread]
spoony moon wrote: Turtle Hermit Roshi wrote: crazy space 1 wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: OP has no clue how game development works. buhahaha other than being a professional in the games industry. News flash no game have even been de...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.13 20:08:00
|
845. Thank you CCP (No Sarcasm) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: I'm not the only one who plays the game because I actually enjoy it and have fun?!?!? Sure there's things that need to be worked on but what we have now is still entertaining and CCP has clearly shown they are dedicated to ...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.13 20:05:00
|
846. why does this game have less players online than a 1995 fps? - in General Discussions [original thread]
crazy space 1 wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: OP has no clue how game development works. buhahaha other than being a professional in the games industry. News flash no game have even been developed as poorly as dust has. When they released sk...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.13 20:03:00
|
847. why does this game have less players online than a 1995 fps? - in General Discussions [original thread]
you should consider looking up information before you make jackassey posts. peak yesterday was 3800 plus, today has already hit 3500 before primetime. http://www.eve-offline.net/?server=dust
- by low genius - at 2014.02.13 20:01:00
|
848. big corps go negative - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: what the hell happened guys? My kills were 28, I hate my picture quality Hah, one guy went 5/14 you know, the psn gives you an easy way to take screenshots...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.13 00:21:00
|
849. Immediate OBs in Planetary Conquest games - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1st Lieutenant Tiberius wrote: Mister0Zz wrote: This thread is hilarious. Its like saying there should be a cap for one corp's district ownership because otherwise the corp will get too strong. Its directly counter to the design philosophy b...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.13 00:20:00
|
850. Immediate OBs in Planetary Conquest games - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
it sounds like you want ccp to make the eve side of things less important. that seems counter intuitive.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.13 00:18:00
|
851. PVE how bad do ya want it vote !! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: we shouldnt have to beg for it this is bullcrap we even have to have threads like this PVE should have been relased at launch and on another note id rather pve before a player market and here is why ... to ...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.12 20:36:00
|
852. PVE how bad do ya want it vote !! - in General Discussions [original thread]
1 I only want pve if I can kill the people doing pve.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.12 20:35:00
|
853. FotM and respecs - in General Discussions [original thread]
we use the fotm because we've got all the guns. the fotm just happens to be the one that 'feels' best. respecs are bs.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.12 20:34:00
|
854. Good job on the matchmaking bug fix there CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
COVERT SUBTERFUGE wrote: Nope, nope, NOPE! CCP should be able to come up with a match making system that can predict if players will tank spam in the battle and then not put them in battle. Also, squads shouldn't be able to enjoy the tactical a...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.12 17:01:00
|
855. Commandos need grenades!!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I kind of like that the commando suit is the one without grenades. it's all about gun-game.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.12 16:52:00
|
856. How BPOs could be fixed ASAP and bridging the manufacturing gap - in General Discussions [original thread]
there's no manufacture in your concept here.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.10 20:52:00
|
857. To those old vets, I salute you - in General Discussions [original thread]
I've been here that long
- by low genius - at 2014.02.10 08:28:00
|
858. When vets say "Respec or I leave" - in General Discussions [original thread]
I say: good riddance. if you're not going to be playing this game in 2 years you're totally useless.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.09 21:52:00
|
859. CAN WE GET AN INFANTRY ONLY GAME MODE. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
roll out an av squad and kill all the tanks. easy.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.08 18:35:00
|
860. CCP, want to get rich and make everyone happy? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
sounds like a great way to ruin a game.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.08 18:11:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |