| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
761. Scram Rifle, Plasma Cannon, and Flaylock Pistol - in General Discussions [original thread]
ladwar wrote: yes, and since the forge gun I think they should of got over that, but didn't. as AV its needs more direct damage while the SL needs to be toned down some. the reload is a fine way to limit RoF so that's its close the forge. the ...
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.04 10:32:00
|
762. Scram Rifle, Plasma Cannon, and Flaylock Pistol - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jenova's Witness wrote: iceyburnz wrote: What is the plasma cannon actually for? Embarrassing someone without having to tebag them. I know I'm not the only one that chuckles when I see a plasma cannon death on the kill feet. lol true tr...
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.04 10:18:00
|
763. Scram Rifle, Plasma Cannon, and Flaylock Pistol - in General Discussions [original thread]
IamI3rian wrote: [quote=Jenova's Witness] I'm perfectly OK with it btw. It's like the RPG's in MAG... only it's ALSO completely ineffective against vehicles. It wouldn't even be fair to say the weapon is negatively unbalanced (as in weaks...
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.04 10:12:00
|
764. Scram Rifle, Plasma Cannon, and Flaylock Pistol - in General Discussions [original thread]
yup this ^
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.04 10:07:00
|
765. Scram Rifle, Plasma Cannon, and Flaylock Pistol - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: iceyburnz wrote: Plasma cannon is useless. It does not fill an open niche. It is an ineffective AV weapon. Its is an ineffective AI weapon. It needs more clip. Firing time speed reducution, and to be made direct fir...
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.04 09:46:00
|
766. Scram Rifle, Plasma Cannon, and Flaylock Pistol - in General Discussions [original thread]
Plasma cannon is useless. It does not fill an open niche. It is an ineffective AV weapon. Its is an ineffective AI weapon. It needs more clip. Firing time speed reducution, and to be made direct fire. Edit: I think the have to spool up time ...
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.04 09:42:00
|
767. so the tac - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jenova's Witness wrote: ANON Illuminati wrote: finally gets a lower rof = rate of fire. you guys cried and complained about it and now you get what you want. whats next? when we continue to use this gun and you still get pwned by it you goin...
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.04 09:40:00
|
768. Question for AURUM users : How much $$$ have you spent so far? - in General Discussions [original thread]
-ú79.96 And yes.
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.03 17:16:00
|
769. Europa Universalis 4 : Better Shooter Than Dust? - in General Discussions [original thread]
EU is basically a very clever casino.
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.03 16:18:00
|
770. DUST MC!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
They're called speeders. They hover. And they are coming soonish.
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.03 14:53:00
|
771. The cost of sniper rifles needs to be DRASTICALLY INCREASED - in General Discussions [original thread]
stlcarlos989 wrote: 1.) Snipers have the HIGHEST survivability of any infantry 2.) They can snipe from the behind the redline and the MCC 3.) The only counter to a good sniper is another sniper 4.) Prototype sniper rifle is 30k cheaper than pro...
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.03 14:48:00
|
772. Templar Manhunt Event - in General Discussions [original thread]
Um... Thats nice. But you're a little late.
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.02 12:47:00
|
773. This community is the worse multiplayer community I have seen - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: As King of this awful community, I'd like to think I speak for everyone when I say tl;dr Thats a nice set of invisible clothes you have there. My. King.
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.02 12:46:00
|
774. 7k players? How?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
7000+ players? I like to think because the game is fun and enjoyable. I'll do the percentage thing too. About 10% of those, are people who complain on the forum, consistantly, and yet still play a game they supposedly think it terribad.
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.02 12:45:00
|
775. This community is the worse multiplayer community I have seen - in General Discussions [original thread]
UNIsTaken wrote: whingers. You get +1 for spelling whingers correctly. This whinging **** has changed since closed beta. And CCP seemingly pandered to the whiners back then too. Amusingly half the whiners they changed the game for, got b...
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.02 12:43:00
|
776. Imperfects, Spies, Nerfs, Politics - in General Discussions [original thread]
I hope the true bloods, stick with it. I kinda like them. Mainly because they have a cool name, and they migrated from another game to dust (that isn't eve) and got pretty good at it. Mad props for all those things. Some of us unaligned no-named...
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.02 12:40:00
|
777. Can people stop winging about downtime? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aesiron Kor-Azor wrote: ShakeMS wrote: Did you mean to say whining? Winging is also a word. It basically means the same thing as whining. Although its spelled "Whinging" Its nobodys fault though the english language is spelled ill...
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.02 12:37:00
|
778. Imperfects Public Relations: Retraction - in General Discussions [original thread]
Wow. Its like the imperfects are the BoB of dust. IBDramabomb.
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.02 12:28:00
|
779. Some perspective for the "fail" crowd out there - in General Discussions [original thread]
Wierd. Loads of epic fail troll threads today. Must be a fool moon.
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.02 12:25:00
|
780. TAC overnerfed; what new gun? - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: I have no sympathy for those who skilled into the TAC AR after the respec since it was blatantly obvious a nerf was incoming at some point. I suppose you'll just have to use on of the other AR variants which isn't OP. I just lik...
- by iceyburnz - at 2013.06.01 22:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |