| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 [80] 90 100 |
1581. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So, have we hit the point in here where base range on mediums and heavies gets significantly buffed yet? Anybody who has actually run ewar knows prec without range is almost worthless and seeing a guy who moves @ 8m/s in the last 10 m for a second...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:33:00
|
1582. [Idea] Fitting folders CCP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Signed, +1 Folders and expansion of available slots is waaaaaaaay overdue, I think I've liked these idea threads a 100x now.
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:27:00
|
1583. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nirwanda Vaughns wrote: with the changes, seeing as the amount of prox mines dropped is limited could we perhaps have them magnetized in teh same way as AV nades with say a 5 or 10m seek range? it'd make them so much more usefull and mixed with...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:25:00
|
1584. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: Jaysyn Larrisen wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Fox Gaden wrote: John Psi wrote: It's very simple - the equipment running from any suit should not live longer this suit. Suit die or refitted - equipment DOWN. So the...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:21:00
|
1585. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
lee corwood wrote: Happy Violentime wrote: So I guess once the gal logis have dropped their deployables they'll be swapping out for their quad scanner suit? scanner plus injector and rep tool with a back up nanohive in a pinch, but likely...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:19:00
|
1586. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: lee corwood wrote: ONLY if that different suit has lower BW than the previous, at which point it would 'poof' the EQ that is OVER the new suits BW in the queue order it was laid. There is nothing to stop multiple playe...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 18:18:00
|
1587. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: No system is perfect, everyone will have to make some kind of sacrifice in order to limit EQ spam. This way, IMO, impacts everyone except logi's far more than it does logi's. This topic has been the central poin...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 17:49:00
|
1588. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: Apothecary Za'ki wrote: most all logi cannot fit a mostly proto tank AND proto equipment and proto weapon.. Why do you need all three? Better question may be Why Don't We Deserve The Ability to Use All Three?
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 17:38:00
|
1589. equipment spam and my solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
smh I really don't want to lend support to the lunatic fringe...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 16:34:00
|
1590. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Syeven Reed wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Syeven Reed wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Because Cross' logi revamps are compatible with BW changes and BW can be adjusted up or down to allow logis greater play and flexibility without indirectly...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 16:07:00
|
1591. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: I think it's even less helpful with the BW mechanic. Placing fallback positions will be a major pain if I can only put out ...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 01:28:00
|
1592. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: With appropriate dialing of the numbers in Cross' idea, BW and its inherent limitations to gameplay outside of equipment are not neccessary. That...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 00:42:00
|
1593. Sticky:[Feedback] HP Modules and Strafe Speed - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RedBleach LeSanglant wrote: Jadd Hatchen wrote: Ok, so I've been reading through all the arguments for this thread and I've come to the conclusion that CCP's original idea for fixing strafing will not work unless something is also done about...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 00:07:00
|
1594. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: I think it's even less helpful with the BW mechanic. Placing fallback positions will be a major pain if I can only put out like 4 uplinks with 5 spawns each at a time. ...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.21 00:02:00
|
1595. Sticky:[Feedback] Equipment Bandwidth - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Mister Goo wrote: Equipment spam is the problem that BW is supposed to fix. I think BW is NOT the answer, there are much better ways to do this ...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.20 23:56:00
|
1596. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: I think it's even less helpful with the BW mechanic. Placing fallback positions will be a major pain if I can only put out like 4 uplinks with 5 spawns each at a time. ANY tactical position creation, reinforcement, ...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.20 23:04:00
|
1597. CPM input request: Logistics & Support. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'm behind on this thread, been sidetracked elsewhere trying to keep us from getting ****** and scouts from getting even more stealthbuffs.
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.20 21:22:00
|
1598. Sticky:[Feedback] HP Modules and Strafe Speed - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Blueprint For Murder wrote: I don't like the idea of kinkats increasing strife speed as scout hp doesn't come into play that often when I am playing or at least I don't notice it, but hit detection does it worries me that all scouts will be abl...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.20 21:04:00
|
1599. "You Are Being Repaired" - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
+1 Agreed, return the glow or create a new indicator. Its long overdue and has been asked for and about countless times. iirc it was dropped in the first place to be tweaked due to peoples concerns about it obscuring vision and was then subseque...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.20 20:59:00
|
1600. [Feedback] Equipment Signature Profiles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Al the destroyer wrote: I don't think remotes or proximity mine should be passively scanned ever I disagree, doing this would provide no counter opportunity to devices deployable from already largely uncounterable positions, like RE rain fro...
- by el OPERATOR - at 2014.11.20 20:40:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 [80] 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |